Failed Root Canals: the Case for Apicoectomy (Periradicular Surgery) Thomas Von Arx, PD Dr Med Dent*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Failed Root Canals: the Case for Apicoectomy (Periradicular Surgery) Thomas Von Arx, PD Dr Med Dent* CLINICAL CONTROVERSIES IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY: PART TWO J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:832-837, 2005 Failed Root Canals: The Case for Apicoectomy (Periradicular Surgery) Thomas von Arx, PD Dr med dent* Apicoectomy involves the surgical management of Treatment Outcome of a tooth with a periapical lesion which cannot be Periradicular Surgery resolved by conventional endodontic treatment Prior to the introduction of microsurgical tech- (root canal therapy or endodontic retreatment). niques, inconsistent success rates were reported for Because the term “apicoectomy” consists of only periradicular surgery varying between 44% and 90%.2 one aspect (removal of root apex) of a complex Based on a weighted average calculation of reviewed series of surgical procedures, the terms “periapical studies, a success rate of 81% was found for perira- surgery” or “periradicular surgery” are more appro- dicular surgery with simultaneous orthograde treat- priate. The expressions “periapical endodontic sur- ment compared with only 59% for periradicular sur- gery” and “apical microsurgery” are also found in gery without simultaneous orthograde treatment.2 the literature. Interestingly, conventional retreatment of teeth with The objective of periapical surgery is to obtain apical periodontitis showed a weighted average suc- tissue regeneration. This is usually achieved by the cess rate of only 66%, whereas retreatment to correct removal of periapical pathologic tissue and by exclu- radiographically or technically deficient root fillings sion of any irritants within the physical confines of in teeth with periapical disease had a weighted aver- the affected root. age success rate of 95%.2 Considering the limitations of different studies, randomized and prospective clin- ical trials comparing surgical to nonsurgical retreat- ment are needed. Two such studies have been pub- Indications/Contraindications lished.3,4 One study described a higher success rate for surgery after 1 year (58% versus only 28%), al- Because the majority of periapical lesions are asso- though not statistically significant.3 The other study ciated with endodontic pathology, except in cases of reported a statistically significant higher healing rate rare developmental cysts or tumors, the primary goal for surgical retreatment after 1 year, but at the 2-year of treatment is orthograde occlusal approach for root examination, no such difference was found: 60% ver- canal instrumentation and obturation. However, in sus 55%.4 certain cases, endodontic treatment, or retreatment, Following the introduction of microsurgical tech- is not feasible or is contraindicated, and hence an niques, treatment outcomes have improved consider- indication1 for periradicular surgery arises (Table 1). ably and success rates have approached or exceeded In addition to these “objective” indications, we have 90%5-17 (Table 3). These increased success rates are to consider demands by the patient regarding fi- credited to a number of factors that have all con- nances, psychological issues, and treatment time. tributed to the improved outcome of periradicular Contraindications for periradicular surgery are listed surgery: microinstruments, magnification and intraoper- in Table 2. ative inspection, root-end filling materials, and regener- ative techniques. *Associate Professor, Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatol- ogy, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland. Microinstruments Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr von Arx: Root-end cavities have traditionally been prepared Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, School of Dental by means of small round burs or inverted cone burs in Medicine, University of Berne, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH-3010 Berne, a microhandpiece. In the early 1990s, sonically or Switzerland; e-mail: [email protected] ultrasonically driven microsurgical retrotips became © 2005 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons commercially available. This new technique of retro- 0278-2391/05/6306-0018$30.00/0 grade cavity preparation has been established as an doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.02.019 essential adjunct in periradicular surgery.18 Clinically, 832 THOMAS VON ARX 833 tures containing deposits of necrotic tissue and bac- Table 1. INDICATIONS FOR PERIRADICULAR SURGERY (ACCORDING TO ESE 1994) terial toxins have significantly contributed to the better healing success following periapical surgery. Obstructed canal with radiologic findings and/or Careful examination of lingual canals or buccal walls clinical symptoms Extruded material with radiologic findings and/or of retropreparation cavities is most often possible clinical symptoms only with micromirrors, because loupes or micro- Failed root canal treatment when retreatment is scopes do not allow the surgeon to look “around the inappropriate (isthmus tissue, persistent acute corner.” Another magnification device to circumvent symptoms or flare-ups, risk of root fracture) Perforations with radiologic findings and/or clinical such difficulties is the endoscope. Although its appli- symptoms, and where it is impossible to treat from cation has been limited in dentistry, there has been a within the pulp cavity growing interest in the use of endoscopy for intraop- Abbreviation: ESE, European Society of Endodontology. erative diagnostics, particularly in periradicular sur- 29,30 Thomas von Arx: Periradicular Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg gery. The endoscope complements the increasing 2005. popularity of applied magnification techniques in dentistry. The advantages of endoscopy in periradicu- lar surgery compared with microscopy include rapid the most relevant advantages are the improved access to root-ends in a limited working space and the and easy adjustment of the viewing angle, and the smaller osteotomy required for surgical access be- direct viewing without the need for the use of dental cause of the angulation and small size of the ret- micromirrors. In addition, the endoscope is a readily rotips.19 However, a number of experimental studies transportable, versatile, and expandable system. have demonstrated other advantages of using mi- Recently, 2 experimental studies have substanti- crotips, such as the preparation of deeper cavities, ated the power of endoscopes for identification of 31,32 and cavities following more closely the original path microstructures. One in vitro study compared the of the root canal.20 The more centered root-end prep- effectiveness of visual enhancements as aids in iden- aration also lessens the risk of lateral perforation. In tifying artificially created dentinal cracks in resected addition, the geometry of the retrotip design does not root-ends. Statistically, the endoscope was signifi- require a beveled root-end resection for surgical ac- cantly superior compared with unaided/corrected vi- cess, thereby decreasing the number of exposed den- sion, loupes, or the microscope.31 tinal tubules and possible leakage through patent tu- The other in vitro study evaluated the diagnostic bules. This is consistent with the criteria established accuracy of endoscopy following root-end resec- for the minimal depth of a retrograde filling with tion and root-end cavity preparation. Endoscopic 21,22 regard to the bevel of the cut root face. Any findings were compared with those obtained with concern about increased formation of cracks or mi- scanning electron microscopy (following root-end crofractures by (ultra)sonic root-end preparation have duplication) serving as the “gold standard.” Speci- been addressed and proved otherwise in several ex- ficity and sensitivity of endoscopic identification of 23-27 perimental studies and in one clinical study. isthmuses, accessory canals, obturation gaps, mi- crofractures, and chipping of cavity margins were Magnification and high, ranging between 73% and 100%.32 It was Intraoperative Inspection concluded that the endoscope is a highly accurate device for intraoperative diagnostics in periradicu- Parallel to the advent of microinstruments, well- lar surgery. focused illumination and magnification have been rec- ommended as a standard of care in periradicular sur- gery.28 Working with loupes or with a surgical microscope has become a widely accepted practice in Table 2. CONTRAINDICATIONS FOR PERIRADICULAR conventional and surgical endodontics. It was discov- SURGERY (ACCORDING TO ESE 1994) ered that only the identification and treatment of microscopic findings, such as isthmuses, accessory Local anatomical factors (eg, inaccessible root end) Tooth with inadequate periodontal support canals, or microfractures of the root, would result in Nonrestorable tooth, tooth without function (no periradicular healing or prevent failures, respectively. antagonist, no pillar for removable or fixed prothesis) Rubinstein and Kim11,15 have reported very high suc- Uncooperative patient cess rates after periradicular surgery: 96.5% for the Compromised medical history 1-year and 91.5% for the 5-year examination periods. Abbreviation: ESE, European Society of Endodontology. They thought that with the use of the surgical micro- Thomas von Arx: Periradicular Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg scope, the identification of microanatomical struc- 2005. 834 PERIRADICULAR SURGERY Table 3. CLINICAL STUDIES ON PERIRADICULAR SURGERY PUBLISHED BETWEEN 1996 AND 2003 Success Author Year n Follow-up Retroprep Retrofill Rate Sumi et al5 1996 157 6 mo to 3 yr Ultrasonic microtip SuperEBA 92.4% Rud et al6 1997 153 (Root canal empty) 2 to 4 yr Shallow concavity Retroplast 81% with ball-shaped diamond bur 153 (Root filling
Recommended publications
  • Effectiveness of Two Different Methods Used for Dry Socket
    IJOCR Rabi A Gafoor et al 10.5005/jp-journals-10051-0119 ORIGINAL RESEArcH Effectiveness of Two Different Methods used for Dry Socket Management: A Comparative Study 1Rabi A Gafoor, 2Kiren B Thaliyath, 3Joyce Thomas, 4Sujay Gopal, 5Joseph Joy, 6Aravind Ashok ABSTRACT How to cite this article: Gafoor RA, Thaliyath KB, Thomas J, Gopal S, Joy J, Ashok A. Effectiveness of Two Different Methods Introduction: Dry socket remains among the most commonly used for Dry Socket Management: A Comparative Study. Int encountered complications following extraction of teeth. It occurs J Oral Care Res 2017;5(4):294-297. during the healing phase of extraction sockets, and some inves- tigators regard it as the commonest postextraction complication. Source of support: Nil Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effective- Conflict of interest: None ness of two different methods used for dry socket management. Materials and methods: The current study consisted of INTRODUCTION 40 subjects aged between 21 and 35 years who reported with a severe pain following forceps tooth extraction. The subjects After tooth extraction, dry socket is the most common were randomly allotted to two different groups: I and II. Group complication. For the clinical analysis of a dry socket, I consisted of zinc oxide eugenol pack method and group II around 17 different definitions are available.1 Blum2 consisted of debridement method. Patient satisfaction was described dry socket as the presence of “postoperative assessed subjectively using a graded scale from very satisfied to very unsatisfied. Visual analog scale (VAS) was utilized to pain in and around the extraction site, which increases record the degree of pain.
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Management of a Separated Endodontic Instrument Using
    Review Article Clinician’s corner Images in Medicine Experimental Research Case Report Miscellaneous Letter to Editor DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25761.9991 Case Report Postgraduate Education Surgical Management of a Separated Case Series Endodontic Instrument using Second Dentistry Section Generation Platelet Concentrate and Short Communication Hydroxyapatite SL SATHEESH1, SHEFALI JAIN2, atUL CHANDRA BHUYAN3, LEKSHMY S DEVI4 ABSTRACT Fractured endodontic instrument is an unfortunate endodontic mishap which may obstruct thorough cleaning and shaping of the root canals with potential impact on the endodontic prognosis and treatment outcome. When the fractured segment lies apical to canal curvature, overzealous removal of tooth structure is required to gain access to the separated segment which in turn increases the likelihood of root fracture. In infected cases, the stage at which instrument separation occurs is crucial as root canal disinfection is jeopardized. This case report describes the surgical retrieval of a fractured endodontic file from the mesiobuccal canal of mandibular first molar by limited resection of mesial root. Second generation platelet concentrate called Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) and nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and β- tricalcium phosphate bone graft was placed to fill the surgical defect as the combination enhances the regenerative effect of PRF by exerting an osteoconductive effect in the bony defect area. The clinical and radiographic examination after eighteen months revealed complete periapical healing. Keywords: Bone graft, Instrument fracture, Instrument retrieval, Periapical surgery, Platelet rich fibrin CASE REPORT symptomatic. Treatment plan was changed to periapical surgery to A 32-year-old male patient with a chief complaint of dull aching pain retrieve the fractured file from mesiobuccal canal because it was in relation to his mandibular left first molar tooth (# 19) was referred deemed likely that further attempts to remove the file could perforate to Department of Endodontics for retreatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Apexification of Immature Permanent Incisors Using MTA and Calcium Hydroxide- Case Report
    IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume 19, Issue 4 Ser.7 (April. 2020), PP 33-37 www.iosrjournals.org Apexification of Immature Permanent Incisors using MTA and Calcium hydroxide- Case Report Tanu Rajain1, Kesang Tsomu2, Ritu Namdev3 1Post Graduate Trainee 2nd year , Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, PGIDS , Rohtak, Haryana. 2Post Graduate Trainee 3rd year , Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, PGIDS , Rohtak, Haryana. 3Senior Professor and Head, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, PGIDS , Rohtak, Haryana. Corresponding Author: Dr. Tanu Rajain , Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS , Rohtak , Haryana- 124001, India. Abstract- In young pediatric patient the endodontic management of immature non vital permanent teeth is a great challenge to dentist. There is difficulty in debridement and obturation as the walls of the root canals are frequently divergent and open apexes are present. Apexification is a technique to generate a calcific barrier in a root with an open apex or the sustained apical development of an incomplete root in teeth with necrotic pulp. The most commonly advocated medicament is calcium hydroxide although recently considerable interest has been expressed in the use of MTA. In this case series both calcium hydroxide and MTA were used successfully for apexification procedure in teeth with open apex. Keywords- Young permanent maxillary incisor, open apex, calcium hydroxide, mineral trioxide aggregate, apexification. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Date of Submission: 04-04-2020 Date of Acceptance: 20-04-2020 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- I. Introduction Dental trauma in the young adolescent patient is most common to the anterior dentition.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2000 Issue the Providers' News 1 To
    To: All Providers From: Provider Network Operations Date: June 21, 2000 Please Note: This newsletter contains information pertaining to Arkansas Blue Cross Blue Shield, a mutual insurance company, it’s wholly owned subsidiaries and affiliates (ABCBS). This newsletter does not pertain to Medicare. Medicare policies are outlined in the Medicare Providers’ News bulletins. If you have any questions, please feel free to call (501)378-2307 or (800)827-4814. What’s Inside? "Any five-digit Physician's Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, descriptions, numeric ABCBS Fee Schedule Change 1 modifiers, instructions, guidelines, and other material are copyright 1999 American Medical Association. All Anesthesia Base Units 2 Rights Reserved." Claims Imaging and Eligibility 2 ABCBS Fee Schedule Change Reminder: Effective July 1, 2000 Arkansas Blue Cross Claims Payment Issues 3 Blue Shield is updating the fee schedule used to price professional claims. The update includes changes in the Coronary Artery Intervention 2 Relative Value Units used to calculate the maximum allowances as well as the implementation of Site-Of - CPT Code 99070 2 Service (SOS) pricing. Dental Fee Schedule 2 Under SOS pricing, a given procedure may have different allowances when provided in a setting other Electronic Filing Reminder 2 than the office. Health Advantage Referral Reminder 2 The Place Of Service reported in block 24b on the HCFA 1500 claim form indicates which allowance should be Type of Service Corrections 3 applied. An “11” in this field indicates that the service was delivered in the office setting. Any value other than Attachments “11” in block 24b will result in the application of the SOS A Guide to the HCFA - 1500 Claim Form pricing, if there is an applicable SOS allowance for that (Paper Claims) 7 service.
    [Show full text]
  • Apicoectomy Treatment
    INFORMED CONSENT DISCUSSION FOR APICOECTOMY TREATMENT Patient Name: Date: DIAGNOSIS: Patient’s initials required Twisted, curved, accessory or blocked canals may prevent removal of all inflamed or infected pulp/nerve during root canal treatment. Since leaving any pulp/nerve in the root canal may cause your symptoms to continue or worsen, this might require an additional procedure called an apicoectomy. Through a small opening cut in the gums and surrounding bone, any infected tissue is removed and the root canal is sealed, which is referred to as a retrofilling procedure. An apicoectomy may also be required if your symptoms continue after root canal therapy and the tooth does not heal. Benefits of Apicoectomy, Not Limited to the Following: Apicoectomy treatment is intended to help you keep your tooth, allowing you to maintain your natural bite and the healthy functioning of your jaw. This treatment has been recommended to relieve the symptoms of the diagnosis described above. Risks of Apicoectomy, Not Limited to the Following: I understand that following treatment I may experience bleeding, pain, swelling and discomfort for several days, which may be treated with pain medication. It is possible that infection may accompany treatment and must be treated with antibiotics. I will immediately contact the office if my condition worsens or if I experience fever, chills, sweats or numbness. I understand that I may receive a local anesthetic and/or other medication. In rare instances patients have a reaction to the anesthetic, which may require emergency medical attention, or find that it reduces their ability to control swallowing. This increases the chance of swallowing foreign objects during treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of Periradicular Surgery: Apicoectomy and Obturation of the Apex, a Bold Act
    Locurcio et al. Stomatological Dis Sci 2017;1:76-80 DOI: 10.20517/2573-0002.2016.08 Stomatological Disease and Science www.sdsjournal.com Case Report Open Access A case of periradicular surgery: apicoectomy and obturation of the apex, a bold act Lino Lucio Locurcio1, Rachel Leeson2 1Ashford & St. Peter‘s Hospitals, Ashford TW15 3AA, UK. 2Eastman Dental Hospital, London WC1X 8LD, UK. Correspondence to: Dr. Lino Lucio Locurcio, Ashford & St. Peter’s Hospitals, London Road, Ashford TW15 3AA, UK. E-mail: [email protected] How to cite this article: Locurcio LL, Leeson R. A case of periradicular surgery: apicoectomy and obturation of the apex, a bold act. Stomatological Dis Sci 2017;1:76-80. Dr. Lino Lucio Locurcio has a wide experience in oral surgery, achieved throughout his training experience in Italy. He moved to London for a Master at Eastman Dental Institute in London. In addition, Dr. Locurcio had a fellowship in craniofacial surgery at Great Ormond Street Children Hospital. At the moment he is working in London as oral surgeon and implantologist with a special interest in maxillofacial and skin cancer surgery. Besides his hospital commitments, Dr. Locurcio currently works in a private clinic in Battersea, London. ABSTRACT Article history: This paper reports a case of a recurrent periapical cyst treated with enucleation of the lesion, Received: 08-10-2016 apicoectomy, and root end obturation on a lower left first molar. In the case of conventional Accepted: 21-12-2016 root canal treatment failure, non-surgical retreatment is the preferred option in most of the Published: 29-06-2017 cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Repair of Root and Tooth Perforations JOHN D
    Endodontic Topics 2005, 11, 152–178 Copyright r Blackwell Munksgaard All rights reserved ENDODONTIC TOPICS 2005 1601-1538 Surgical repair of root and tooth perforations JOHN D. REGAN, DAVID E. WITHERSPOON & DEBORAH M. FOYLE A root perforation is a mechanical or pathological communication formed between the supporting periodontal apparatus of the tooth and the root canal system. Three broad categories of etiological factors exist and these are procedural mishaps, resorption and caries. The diagnosis, management and repair of root perforations require skill and creative thinking. Unfortunately, much of what has been written on the subject of root perforation repair is unsubstantiated and empirical in nature and contributes little to evidence-based support for any specific repair procedure. However, perforation repair frequently provides a very attractive and frequently successful alternative to extraction of the involved tooth. In recent years, the procedure has become more predictable owing to the development of new materials, techniques and procedures. Introduction many perforations has been facilitated by the use of improved magnification and illumination provided by A root perforation is a mechanical or pathological the use of loupes or the surgical operating microscope communication formed between the supporting per- (SOM) (9, 10, 15–28). In practice, however, the iodontal apparatus of the tooth and the root canal indications for surgical correction of root perforations system (1). Perforations result in the destruction of the are being eroded from two directions: on the one hand dentine root wall or floor along with the investing by the improved non-surgical management of perfora- cementum. This communication compromises the tions and on the other by the use of implants.
    [Show full text]
  • In Vitro Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Effects of Kri 1 Paste And
    SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE In vitro antimicrobialand cytotoxic effects of Kri 1 pasteand zinc oxide-eugenolused in primarytooth pulpectomies Kelly J. Wright, DMDSergio V. Barbosa, DDS, PhD Kouji Araki, DDS,PhD Larz S.W. Sp~ngberg,DDS, PhD Abstract The antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of Kri I paste, an iodoform-basedprimary tooth filling material, were comparedwith zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE), using in vitro techniques. Antimicrobial evaluation involved measuring inhibition zones Streptococcus faecalis on brain heart agar. Cytotoxicity evaluation involved direct cell-medicamentcontact experiments of 4-hr and 24-hr duration using fresh and set medicaments,and indirect cell-medicamentcontact experiments of 24-hr duration using fresh and set medicaments.ZOE produced a greater zone of bacterial inhibition than Kri 1 paste. Kri 1 paste cytotoxicity remainedhigh regardless of the amountof setting time in the 4-hr direct contact experiment, while ZOEcytotoxicity decreased with setting time. Both Kri I paste and ZOEhad high cytotoxicity regardless of setting time in the 24-hr direct cell-medicament contact test. ZOEcytotoxicity decreased to control levels after only 1 day of setting in the indirect contact experiments, comparedwith greater than 7 days for Kri I paste. The results suggest ZOEhas better antimicrobial activity than Kri I paste. ZOEalso has lower cytotoxicity, although prolongedcell-medicament contact mayresult in both medicamentshaving similarly high cytotoxicity. (Pediatr Dent 16:102-6, 1994) Introduction time of the material. No osteolytic changes were found To maintain function, esthetics, arch length, and arch surrounding ZOEimplants. Several studies have in- vestigated the antimicrobial action of Kri I in vivo 9’ 11-13 symmetry, primary teeth should be maintained in the 1~-16 dental arch until their proper exfoliation timeo1, 2 and in vitro.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Prasad Musale (MDS, MLD)
    Dr Prasad Musale (MDS, MLD) ✤ Graduate from Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College & Hospital, Pune(1994), Postgraduate from Government Dental College & Hospital, Mumbai(1999) and Masters in Laser Dentistry from Med- ical University of Vienna, Austria(2010) ✤ Teaching experience of 19 years ✤ Core interest in Pediatric Endodontics, Microscopic Pediatric Dentistry, MID and Laser assisted Pediatric Dentistry ✤ Published more than 25 International and National scientific papers ✤ Contributed many chapters in leading Pediatric Dentistry textbooks of authors like Dr Damle and Dr Shobha Tondon. ✤ Invited as Speaker/Faculty for National and international conferences ✤ Director of “Little Ones Big Smiles” Laser and Microscope Integrated Pediatric Dentistry in Pune since 1999 PEDIATRIC ENDODONTICS VITAL AND NON-VITAL PULP THERAPY Dr Prasad Musale (MDS, MLD) Pune,India SCOPE OF PEDIATRIC ENDODONTICS # To understand the developmental and biomedical aspects of primary and permanent pulp # Comprehensive clinical and radiographic diagnosis of the pulp and periradicular lesions # Vital pulp therapy and Nonvital pulp therapy including Regenerative Endodontics # Selective surgical removal of pathological tissues resulting from pulpal pathosis # Intentional replantation and replantation of avulsed teeth # Surgical removal of tooth structure, such as root-end resection and root-end filling; hemisection, and root resection # Bleaching of discolored dentin and enamel # Retreatment of teeth previously treated endodontically # Coronal restorations by means of post
    [Show full text]
  • Coding Guidelines for Dentists
    246 > COMMUNIQUE Coding guidelines for dentists SADJ July 2014, Vol 69 no 6 p246 - p248 M Khan ICD-10 coding remains confusing for some dentists and their persists for a very long time and seeks relief from the pain. personnel. We have recently heard from the administrators The patient agrees that you can take a periapical radiograph that they had to reject R18 000 worth of claims on one day of the tooth. The radiograph shows an interproximal cari- as a result of incorrect ICD-10 coding. This article attempts ous lesion on the distal of tooth 21, extending deep into the to provide some clarity on this issue. dentine, but not yet into the pulp. The lamina dura in rela- tion to the apex of the root appears to be normal. The tooth The biggest misconception about ICD-10 responds with a sharp pain following a percussion test. You The most common question asked about the system is: “What document the following diagnosis on your records: “21 se- is the ICD-10 code for this procedure code?” Please note that vere interproximal caries (distal) with an irreversible pulpitis ICD-10 coding does not work like this. There is no standard or and an acute periapical periodontitis”. You explain the diag- fixed ICD-10 code related to any procedure code. nosis, the required follow-up procedures and the estimated costs to the patient who agrees to a root canal treatment Basic principle of ICD-10 coding and further radiographs. ICD-10 coding is a diagnostic system and dental procedures The invoice after treatment is as follows: can be performed as result of various different diagnoses.
    [Show full text]
  • Porosity Distribution in Root Canals Filled with Gutta Percha and Calcium
    DENTAL-2580; No. of Pages 9 ARTICLE IN PRESS d e n t a l m a t e r i a l s x x x ( 2 0 1 5 ) xxx–xxx Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.intl.elsevierhealth.com/journals/dema Porosity distribution in root canals filled with gutta percha and calcium silicate cement a a a Amir T. Moinzadeh , Wilhelm Zerbst , Christos Boutsioukis , a b,∗ Hagay Shemesh , Paul Zaslansky a Department of Endodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands b Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany a r t a b i s c l t r e i n f o a c t Article history: Objective. Gutta percha is commonly used in conjunction with a sealer to produce a fluid- Received 31 March 2015 tight seal within the root canal fillings. One of the most commonly used filling methods is Received in revised form lateral compaction of gutta percha coupled with a sealer such as calcium silicate cement. 28 May 2015 However, this technique may result in voids and worse, the filling procedures may damage Accepted 15 June 2015 the root. Available online xxx Methods. We compared the volume of the voids associated with two root canal filling meth- ods, namely lateral compaction and single cone. Micro-computed tomography was used Keywords: to assess the porosity associated with each method in vitro. An automated, observer- Filling materials independent analysis protocol was used to quantify the unfilled regions and the porosity Voids located in the sealer surrounding the gutta percha.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 17.Pdf
    Richard E. Walton DRAINAGE OF AN ABSCESS Irrigation PERlAPlCAL SURGERY Radiographic Verification lndications Flap Replacement and Suturing Anatomic Problems Postoperative Instructions Restorative Considerations Suture Removal and Evaluation Horizontal Root Fracture CORRECTIVE SURGERY Irretrievable Material in Canal Indications Procedural Error Procedural Errors Large Unresolved Lesions After Root Canal Resorptive Perforations Treatment Contraindications Contraindications (or Cautions) Anatomic Considerations Unidentified Cause of Treatment Failure Location of Perforation When Conventional Root Canal Treatment is Accessibility Possible Considerations Simultaneous Root Canal Treatment and Apical Surgical Approach Surgery Repair Material Anatomic Considerations Prognosis Poor Crown and Root Ratio Surgical Procedure Medical (Systemic) Complications HEALING Surgical Procedure RECALL Flap Design ADJUNCTS Semilunar lncision Light and Magnification Devices Submarginal incision Surgical Microscope Full Mucoperiosteal lncision Fiber Optics Anesthesia Guided Tissue Regeneration lncision and Reflection Bone Augmentation Periapical Exposure WHEN TO CONSIDER REFERRAL Curettage Training and Experience Root End Resection Determining the Cause of Root Canal Treatment Root End Preparation and Restoration Failure Root End-Filling Materials Surgical Difficulties Principles of Endodontic Surgery . CHAPTER 17 381 ndodontic surgery is the management or preven- tion of periradicular pathosis by a surgical approach. In general, this includes abscess drainage,
    [Show full text]