DOCSLIB.ORG

London Borough of Ealing, (Southall Gas Works)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
London Borough of Ealing, (Southall Gas Works) Report of the Corporate Director of Planning and Community Services Address: OUTBOROUGH CONSULTATION BY LONDON BOROUGH OF EALING (SOUTHALL GAS WORKS SITE, HAYES BY-PASS, HAYES (OUTLINE APPLICATION)) Development: DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS, REMEDIATION OF LAND AND REDEVELOPMENT OF SITE FOR MIXED USES LBH Ref Nos: 39704/APP/2009/1917 Drawing Nos: received 29/10/08 Date of receipt: 29/10/2008 Date(s) of Amendment(s): 01/05/2009 1.0 SUMMARY 1.1 The majority of this 44.7Ha site is located in the London Borough of Ealing, immediately to the east of the Grand Union canal. The proposed redevelopment of the former Southall Gas Works offers significant regenerative benefits (including remediation of contaminated land and provision of a considerable amount of housing). 1.2 As this report relates to the request from the London Borough of Ealing for observations and comments in relation to the planning application it has received, the issue for consideration by the Central and South Planning Committee is the impact of the proposed development on the London Borough of Hillingdon (rather than the determination of the application itself). 1.3 This is a substantial scheme with the potential to cause significant adverse impacts on the London Borough of Hillingdon. The application in its current form does not propose to adequately mitigate impacts, as such the proposal would: • Cause harm to the highways network; • Result in the loss of ecologically significant wildlife habitat; and • Result in future residents of the scheme intensively using land and facilities within the London Borough of Hillingdon (land and facilities which do not have the spare capacity necessary to cope with additional loading which would be resultant from this scheme); • Cause harm to the setting of the Green Belt and Grand Union Canal. 1.4 Additionally, supporting documentation accompanying the scheme fails to demonstrate that the scheme would not result in potentially adverse economic impacts on existing centres and their shopping areas. Concern is also raised Central & South Planning Committee – 15 September 2009 PART I – MEMBERS, PUBLIC AND PRESS in relation to the monitoring and management of contaminated material during remediation works (including the transportation of contaminated materials through the London Borough of Hillingdon). 1.5 It is considered that the impact of the proposed development on land within the London Borough of Hillingdon has not been adequately addressed by the Applicant. 2.0 RECOMMENDATION: That the London Borough of Ealing be informed that the London Borough of Hillingdon raises strong objection to the proposed scheme on the following grounds: 1. The applicant has failed to demonstrate that the road network can accommodate the levels of traffic that would be generated by the development, nor has it been demonstrated that there would not be a significant worsening of conditions on the highway network within the London Borough of Hillingdon. In particular objection is raised to: • The impact of the development on the Bilton Way, which would result in a queue from the Pump Lane / Bilton Way roundabout to the Hayes bypass slip road; • The lack of any assessment of impacts arising from the development on Pump Lane / Coldharbour Lane roundabout; • Three bus routes are proposed through Pump Lane (which has a width restriction). No details of measures to prevent HGV’s using the bus route to gain access to Coldharbour Lane are proposed; Lack of a turning head at the proposed dead end with the A312. 2. The application fails to demonstrate that the development would not cause unacceptable harm to the ecology of the wider area, including Minet Country Park, the neighbouring river/blue ribbon network and Yeading Valley. The scope and timing of surveys of flora and fauna are inadequate to accurately demonstrate the presence or otherwise of endangered species. Proposed measures to mitigate for loss and fragmentation of wildlife habitat are unsatisfactory and would not offset the unacceptable harm to the ecology of the wider area caused by the development. 3. The proposed development would have significant adverse impacts on land and facilities in the London Borough of Hillingdon and the application does not provide for planning obligations to offset the impacts. Specifically, planning obligations are required for the following: • Financial contribution to implement mitigation measures and capacity enhancements to Minet Country Park made necessary by the proposed development. Financial contribution sought: £3,038,000; Central & South Planning Committee – 15 September 2009 PART I – MEMBERS, PUBLIC AND PRESS • Financial contribution to offset impacts on local educational facilities. Financial contribution sought: £821,000; • Financial contribution towards capacity enhancements in local recreational and leisure facilities: £1,000,000; • Financial contribution to implement works to enable the public realm to cope with additional users: £50,000; • Provision of construction training of Hillingdon residents, by enabling them to actively work and receive construction training on the construction site; • Require the Applicant to enter into and abide by the terms of a Sustainable Travel Plan. Additionally British Waterways requested that the following planning obligations be secured: • Financial contribution towards a strategic master plan for the wider area: £20,000; • Financial contribution towards delivery and implementation of a Waterspace Strategy: £10,000; • Financial contribution towards remediation of land between Yeading Brook and the Grand Union canal (Minet Tip): £4,000,000; • Financial contribution to implement works to improve access along the canal edge from Uxbridge Road to Bulls Bridge: £660,000. The heads of terms requested by British Waterways seek to protect human health and safety, secure enhancements to the Grand Union canal and its tow path made necessary by the development and are fully supported by the London Borough of Hillingdon . The Applicant has advised that the scheme finances are affected by exceptional development costs and as such the imposition of Planning Obligations may make the scheme financially unviable. No demonstrable evidence has been provided to verify the financial position of the development. If the obligations set out above are not satisfied the unacceptable impacts will remain and as such the application would remain unacceptable in planning terms and should be refused. 4. The proposed development includes a significant amount of retail space and the retail impact assessment submitted in support of the application does not demonstrate that the scale of the proposed retail component would not unacceptably harm existing centres. The retail study accompanying the application is considered inadequate for the following reasons: • Information relating to the existing supply of retail space (including vacancy rates) dates from 2006. The age of this Central & South Planning Committee – 15 September 2009 PART I – MEMBERS, PUBLIC AND PRESS research makes its use in 2009 unreliable. Since 2006, retailing has been going through a fundamental market correction, new retailers have opened (e.g. Westfield shopping centre in Shepherds Bush). Vacancies have been increasing in town centres with businesses often under trading. The use of information from 2006 is simply not appropriate. • The retail economic impact assessment accompanying the application does not take account of changes to consumer spending enabled by the proposed access ways to the site from the west (including three bus routes through Pump Lane) and the impact this would have on spending in Hayes town centre. Unless the retail study, including the sequential test is revisited to consider current market conditions and the influence of the proposed access arrangements (including bus services along the Pump Lane extension) on spending patterns, the London Borough of Hillingdon objects to the scheme on the basis of its potential impacts upon Hayes Town Centre. 5. The application provides inadequate measures to ameliorate the potential impacts of remediating on site contaminants and to ensure that these works do not cause harm to human health and wider environment (potential receptors include the Guru Nanak School, users of Minet Park and adjacent land over the brook, and occupiers of any nearby housing and business areas in Hayes). Remediation works would produce emissions of dust and odours and vapours, and if not fully controlled at source, could adversely affect residents in the London Borough of Hillingdon. The application does not propose dust and odour / vapour monitoring, nor is it proposed to manage traffic leaving site (including vehicles transporting contaminated waste) so as to prevent any contaminants from entering the environment. 6. The scale of development proposed in such close proximity to the canal has the potential to cause harm to the visual amenities of the Green Belt. A greater minimum set back of buildings from the canal is required to ensure that the open appearance the Green Belt is maintained and to allow for structural landscaping to be incorporated into the proposal as a buffer between the development, the canal and Green Belt land to the west. In addition it is recommended that the London Borough of Ealing be advised of the following: 1. In relation to Objection 1 above, should the London Borough of Ealing be minded to grant planning permission despite our objections we would request that as a minimum the following conditions be imposed:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ickenham Calling …
    Ickenham Calling ….. The Newsletter of the Ickenham Residents’ Association Spring 2018 Affiliated to the Hillingdon Alliance of Residents’ Associations. Member of Herts. & Middx. Wildlife Trust, and London Green Belt Council. The Community Voice—monitoring the NHS in NW London and SW Herts. INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Ickenham Residents’ Association: E-Mail Address [email protected] CHAIRMAN’S WebSite www.ickenhamresidents.co.uk COMMENTS Twitter Acc. www.twitter.com/IckenhamRA AGM 2018 CHAIRMAN’S COMMENTS and community inclusive”. We very much HS2 welcome such suggestions, and indeed My last Chairman’s Comments referred to the often ask for opinions and suggestions on quarterly Residents Planning Forum organ- what we do. Sadly, this latest letter was PLANNING ised by LBH. The January meeting attended anonymous — we would welcome the INFORMATVES by committee members focussed on the new opportunity to discuss the issues raised in draft “London Plan” written by the Mayor’s person, and perhaps invite help from GOSPEL OAK 2018 Greater London Authority, out for consultation villagers to further some of the proposals. until 2nd March. The Plan aims for many ICKENHAM NATURE more affordable homes whilst creating a saf- We look forward to seeing as many of you RESERVES er, greener city that supports the health and as possible at our 2018 AGM on Friday, well-being of all Londoners. 20th April in the Village Hall. HEALTH MATTERS Jill Dalton In recent years the inner London Boroughs have delivered most of the capital’s housing POLICE MATTERS growth. With 66,000 new homes each year needed to meet demand, the new draft Lon- AGM of the ICKENHAM ICKENHAM don Plan aims to distribute new homes more RESIDENTS’ ASSOCIATION FESTIVAL 2018 evenly around the capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to Scrutiny
    Report to Scrutiny Item Number: Contains Confidential or No Exempt Information Pollution issues relating to the FM Conway Ltd asphalt Subject of Report: plant in Hayes and the regeneration work at the Southall Waterside site Scrutiny Review Panel 3: Air Quality Meeting: 27 September 2018 John Freeman, Regulatory Services Officer, Service Report Author: [email protected], 020 8825 7226 Harjeet Bains, Scrutiny Review Officer, Scrutiny Officer: [email protected], 020 8825 7120 Cabinet Responsibility: Cllr Julian Bell (Regeneration and Transport) Cllr Mik Sabiers (Environment and Highways) Cllr Binda Rai (Health and Adults’ Services) Tony Clements, Executive Director, Regeneration and Director Responsibility: Housing, [email protected], 020 8825 8531 To consider the information provided on pollution issues relating to the FM Conway Ltd asphalt plant in Hayes and the Brief: regeneration work at the Southall Waterside site and make recommendations accordingly. The Panel is recommended to: Recommendations: - consider and comment on the information provided; and - make suggestions for further improvements appropriately. Page 1 of 35 1. Pollution issues relating to the FM Conway Ltd asphalt plant in Hayes and the regeneration work at the Southall Waterside site Introduction Two industrial sites in or adjacent to West Southall have been the subject of numerous odour complaints from residents, businesses and employees in Southall Green and Southall Broadway wards. The sites concerned are (a) the roadstone coating (asphalt) plant located in North Hyde Gardens, Hayes, operated by F.M. Conway Ltd and (b) the ‘soil treatment hospital’ within the Southall Waterside development site (the former Southall Gasworks). The map below shows the location of the two sites in relation to the surrounding residential and commercial areas of Southall.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwood Ward Profile
    Northwood Ward Profile Business Performance Team Residents Services January 2019 Hillingdon at a glance, 2017 Population – comparing the 2011 Census figures with those with GLA Interim 2015-based population projections, the borough’s population in 2017 has increased by approximately 10.9% (from 273,936 to 303,870); by comparison London’s population has increased by 8.5%. Over half of Hillingdon's 44.6 square miles is a mosaic of countryside including canals, rivers, parks and woodland. Hillingdon has an average of 25.9 people per hectare; this is the third lowest population density among London boroughs. Gender – 152,246 of borough residents are male and 151,624 are female. Age – 21.7% of the borough population is under 16, 6.1% over 75 and 72.1% aged 16-74 (this is defined as working age). Ethnicity - Hillingdon’s White British population decreased from 73% in the 2001 Census to 52% in the 2011 Census; Hillingdon’s BAME population increased from 27% to 48% in the same period. Current data (from the Greater London Authority 2015 Round Trend-based Ethnic Group Population Projections) shows that Hillingdon’s White British population in 2017 is 43% and the BAME population is 57%. Religion1 - the predominant religions in the borough at 2011 are Christian – 134,813 (49.2%), Muslim – 29,065 (10.6%), Hindu – 22,033 (8%) and Sikh – 18,230 (6.7%), we also have a large percentage of residents stating ‘no religion’ – 46,492 (17%) and other – 23,303 (8.5%). 1. Barnhill 2. Botwell 3. Brunel 4. Cavendish 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Profile
    Hillingdon Borough Profile Business Performance Team Residents Services January 2019 Hillingdon at a glance, 2017 Population – comparing the 2011 Census figures with those with GLA Interim 2015-based population projections, the borough’s population in 2017 has increased by approximately 10.9% (from 273,936 to 303,870); by comparison London’s population has increased by 8.5%. Over half of Hillingdon's 44.6 square miles is a mosaic of countryside including canals, rivers, parks and woodland. Hillingdon has an average of 25.9 people per hectare; this is the third lowest population density among London boroughs. Gender – 152,246 of borough residents are male and 151,624 are female. Age – 21.7% of the borough population is under 16, 6.1% over 75 and 72.1% aged 16-74 (this is defined as working age). Ethnicity - Hillingdon’s White British population decreased from 73% in the 2001 Census to 52% in the 2011 Census; Hillingdon’s BAME population increased from 27% to 48% in the same period. Current data (from the Greater London Authority 2015 Round Trend-based Ethnic Group Population Projections) shows that Hillingdon’s White British population in 2017 is 43% and the BAME population is 57%. Religion1 - the predominant religions in the borough at 2011 are Christian – 134,813 (49.2%), Muslim – 29,065 (10.6%), Hindu – 22,033 (8.0%) and Sikh – 18,230 (6.7%), we also have a large percentage of residents stating ‘no religion’ – 46,492 (17.0%) and other – 23,303 (8.5%). 1 Religion statistics are based on Census 2011 data 2 Hillingdon’s Localities and Wards Ruislip & Northwood 4 Cavendish 6 Eastcote & East Ruislip 7 Harefield 11 Manor 12 Northwood 13 Northwood Hills 15 South Ruislip 20 West Ruislip Uxbridge & West Drayton 3 Brunel 9 Hillingdon East 10 Ickenham 17 Uxbridge North 18 Uxbridge South 19 West Drayton 22 Yiewsley Hayes & Harlington 1 Barnhill 2 Botwell 5 Charville 8 Heathrow Villages 14 Pinkwell 16 Townfield 21 Yeading 3 The London Borough of Hillingdon Hillingdon sits on the outskirts of Greater London and is made up of 3 localities and 22 wards.
    [Show full text]
  • 22 September Court, Hillingdon Road, Uxbridge, UB10 0AG Asking Price of £290,000
    • LONG LEASE 22 September Court, Hillingdon Road, Uxbridge, UB10 0AG Asking Price Of £290,000 • GARAGE NO ONWARD CHAIN. Andrews Residential are delighted to offer to the market this spacious two bedroom apartment situated only minutes from Uxbridge town centre. Benefits include long lease, garage and parking. • NO CHAIN • CLOSE TO UXBRIDGE Property Description THE LOCATION The property is located approximately a short walk from Uxbridge town centre with its vast array of shopping facilities, restaurants, bars, bus links and tube station. The property also has easy access to Brunel University and Hillingdon Hospital. There are a number of popular schools close by such, as St Mary's and Whitehall. Also close by is the A40/M40 & M4/M25 motorway network. OUTSIDE There are well kept communal grounds which are partly laid to lawn and have a large parking area. DETAILS OF SALE The vendor informs us the below information is correct - 1. The lease was extended to a virtual freehold and the new term is 999 years from 25.12.1970. 2. There is no ground rent. (reduced to Nil) 3. Service charges are £150 pm Leasehold Hillingdon Borough Hillingdon office Uxbridge office Hillingdon office 01895 231311 Agents Note: Whilst every care has been taken to prepare these sales particulars, they are for guidance purposes only. All measurements are approximate are for general guidance purposes only and whilst every care has been taken to ensure their accuracy, they should not be relied upon and 11 Crescent Parade 41 Belmont Road Uxbridge office 01895 707777 potential buyers are advised to recheck the measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwood Hills Ward Profile
    Northwood Hills Ward Profile Business Performance Team Residents Services January 2019 Hillingdon at a glance, 2017 Population – comparing the 2011 Census figures with those with GLA Interim 2015-based population projections, the borough’s population in 2017 has increased by approximately 10.9% (from 273,936 to 303,870); by comparison London’s population has increased by 8.5%. Over half of Hillingdon's 44.6 square miles is a mosaic of countryside including canals, rivers, parks and woodland. Hillingdon has an average of 25.9 people per hectare; this is the third lowest population density among London boroughs. Gender – 152,246 of borough residents are male and 151,624 are female. Age – 21.7% of the borough population is under 16, 6.1% over 75 and 72.1% aged 16-74 (this is defined as working age). Ethnicity - Hillingdon’s White British population decreased from 73% in the 2001 Census to 52% in the 2011 Census; Hillingdon’s BAME population increased from 27% to 48% in the same period. Current data (from the Greater London Authority 2015 Round Trend-based Ethnic Group Population Projections) shows that Hillingdon’s White British population in 2017 is 43% and the BAME population is 57%. Religion1 - the predominant religions in the borough at 2011 are Christian – 134,813 (49.2%), Muslim – 29,065 (10.6%), Hindu – 22,033 (8%) and Sikh – 18,230 (6.7%), we also have a large percentage of residents stating ‘no religion’ – 46,492 (17%) and other – 23,303 (8.5%). 1. Barnhill 2. Botwell 3. Brunel 4. Cavendish 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Ickenham Ward Profile
    Ickenham Ward Profile Business Performance Team Residents Services June 2018 Hillingdon at a glance, 2017 Population – comparing the 2011 Census figures with those with GLA Interim 2015-based population projections, the borough’s population in 2017 has increased by approximately 10.9% (from 273,936 to 303,870); by comparison London’s population has increased by 8.5%. Over half of Hillingdon's 44.6 square miles is a mosaic of countryside including canals, rivers, parks and woodland. Hillingdon has an average of 25.9 people per hectare; this is the third lowest population density among London boroughs. Gender – 152,246 of borough residents are male and 151,624 are female. Age – 21.7% of the borough population is under 16, 6.1% over 75 and 72.1% aged 16-74 (this is defined as working age). Ethnicity - Hillingdon’s White British population decreased from 73% in the 2001 Census to 52% in the 2011 Census; Hillingdon’s BAME population increased from 27% to 48% in the same period. Current data (from the Greater London Authority 2015 Round Trend-based Ethnic Group Population Projections) shows that Hillingdon’s White British population in 2017 is 43% and the BAME population is 57%. Religion1 - the predominant religions in the borough at 2011 are Christian – 134,813 (49.2%), Muslim – 29,065 (10.6%), Hindu – 22,033 (8%) and Sikh – 18,230 (6.7%), we also have a large percentage of residents stating ‘no religion’ – 46,492 (17%) and other – 23,303 (8.5%). 1. Barnhill 2. Botwell 3. Brunel 4. Cavendish 5.
    [Show full text]
  • P/2019/3227 00580/AI/P1 Address: Unit 5 Bull
    PLANNING COMMITTEE 20th January 2020 Sam Smith: [email protected] References: P/2019/3227 00580/AI/P1 Unit 5 Bullsbridge Industrial Estate, Hayes Road, Address: Southall, UB2 5LN Ward: Heston West Proposal: Change of use from A1 (non-food) retail to open A1 (including food) retail, subdivision of the existing unit to form two A1 retail units, car park reconfiguration, external alterations and associated works Drawing Numbers: See end of report. Application Received: 04 September 2019 1.0 SUMMARY 1.1 The subject site is the former Toys R Us store in the Bullsbridge Industrial Estate that has been vacant since the business was liquidated in early 2018. 1.2 There is a planning condition on the original 1994 Planning Permission which restricts the use of the site as a food retail business. This application (some 26 years after the original) seeks to subdivide the unit into two stores, accommodating a Lidl food store and Home Bargains. Associated ancillary works including car parking and façade changes are required to facilitate the subdivision and to update the buildings appearance and functionality. 1.3 This report seeks to demonstrate that the proposal will not have an unacceptable impact on the viability of surrounding town centre locations in Hounslow, Hillingdon and Ealing, and also that the proposal would not harm local traffic movements, subject to the imposition of appropriate conditions. 1.4 This report recommends that Members grant Planning Permission for the development, subject to a Legal Agreement and Conditions as recommended in this report. It is therefore recommended that Planning Permission should be APPROVED subject to a legal agreement and the conditions set out at Section 13.0 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 The subject site falls within the Bulls Bridge Industrial Estate located in the north-western corner of the borough, bordering the borough of Hillingdon to the north.
    [Show full text]
  • Celandine Route
    Celandine Route 2.7 miles along the River Pinn 1 8 1 hour, 20 minutes A Walk of 12 miles along the River Pinn from Pinner to the Grand Union Canal at Cowley, through green spaces, W 2 e s t conservation areas and wildlife havens. E l Lane 1 n e d p B L ha a C r n i d e Pinner g Memorial e S Pinner Park tr e Station School vue e ne t A 3 d n E 4 t 6 s t e e W e r t S t l e e e ad Long Meadow o Ro r F J 7 h t 5 o ig S r H y Celandine Route e e S n t e r h e C River Pinn e t Eastcote Hillingdon Trail House Garden Roads d oa E R lm e Railway line br t Park Wood id o g tc e s a D E Mainline station r Kings College i v ue Playing Fields e Broadwood Aven Underground station Park Avenue 8 Kings College Road Bus station Eastcote Station Green spaces ay n W Pi in nn Gate P Winston W ay B Churchill Key ur Hall Celandine Route boards 1 y St Ruislip Hillingdon W Youth re oad e Primary e te R Trail t Library astco Celandine Route s Centre E Refreshments t School O r c River Pinn h H River Pinn a Public house r ig d d h a C Hillingdon Trail o Woodville Gdns l S R tr Ruislip Manor r e Toilets a e Station e t Roads p ks ea ClackLane Parking Br Railway line Mainline station Cricket table Ruislip Ruislip Station Golf Course Ruislip Underground station Moat Bus Station Bowls green Bus station Tennis court Green spaces Golf course West Ruislip Gate Station d a Playground m o a Celandine Route boards 1 R h r n a e e k p c s I Refreshments k a d e Swa a r ke o B R le Public house ys h e R g u oad i n H e v Toilets A e h T e n Parking a Compass L Theatre g d
    [Show full text]
  • 68. Iver Grid SS
    Drawn By: NMM Checked : MN Scale 1:50 Iver Grid Sub Station - Layout Plan Iver to Hillingdon 66 kV Cable Replacement Page No. 68 5m 0m 5m 10m 15m 20m 25m Joint Bay Co-ordinates Towards 66kV GIS Building E:504,329.40 N183,498.75 E:504,330.07 N183,495.92 E:504,339.85 N183.498.14 E:504,339.18 N183,501.05 H Red Phase (Iver - Uxbridge 3 - Joint) E: 504,334.54 N: 183,531.00 Red Phase (Iver - Uxbridge 2 - Joint) · For ABB Installed Circuit(s) Cross Section(s) - E: 504,335.55 N: 183,507.50 Yellow Phase (Iver - Uxbridge 3 - Joint) I-U3 Refer to the following Drawing(s) -: Yellow Phase (Iver - Uxbridge 2 - Joint) · Section A-A - PN/CSED/1125 E: 504,334.68 N: 183,530.26 ℄ E: 504,335.95 N: 183,507.06 · Section B-B - PN/CSED/1128 Blue Phase (Iver - Uxbridge 3 - Joint) Blue Phase (Iver - Uxbridge 2 - Joint) Section C-C - PN/CSED/1124 E: 504,334.81 N: 183,529.12 E: 504,336.00 N: 183,506.09 · · Section D-D - PN/CSED/1127 Iver - Uxbridge 3 (Red Phase) · Section E-E - PN/CSED/1126 Red Phase (Iver - Uxbridge 4 - Joint) Iver - Uxbridge 3 (Yellow Phase) Uxbridge 3 E: 504,336.07 N:183,506.25 · Section F-F - PN/CSED/1195 · Section G-G - PN/CSED/1196 Yellow Phase (Iver - Uxbridge 4 - Joint) Iver - Uxbridge 3 (Blue Phase) E: 504,336.17 N: 183,505.71 · Section H-H - PN/CSED/1197 Blue Phase (Iver - Uxbridge 4 - Joint) · Section J-J - PN/CSED/1198 E: 504,336.25, N: 183,505.37 · Section K-K - PN/CSED/1227 · Section L- L - PN/CSED/1263 ℄ Red Phase (Iver - Hillingdon 2 - Joint) · Section M-M - PN/CSED/1264 I-U3 E: 504,334.30 N: 183,497.48 · Section N-N - PN/CSED/1265
    [Show full text]
  • Ealing, Hillingdon and Hounslow Care Directory Is Also Available to Commission (CQC)
    Ealing, Hillingdon and Hounslow Care Hounslow Directory & 2020 Your local guide to care homes, homecare agencies and care and support services in the Ealing, Hillingdon and Hounslow borough areas Hillingdon Ealing, KENILWORTH NURSING HOME & RAINBOW LODGE NURSING HOME Kenilworth Nursing Home and Rainbow Lodge Nursing Home are two Some of the facilities the homes have to offer are: delightful Victorian period homes located in the quiet suburban • En-suite facilities available in both homes* tranquillity of Ealing. Kenilworth offers nursing care to 31 people who are • Visiting chiropodist, hairdresser, GP and clergy experiencing mental health problems, dementia/alzheimers and those with • all types of challenging behaviour. Rainbow Lodge offers 15 places to 5 STAR 'Food & Hygiene' Rating at both homes young people who require care for mental health problems in a nursing • Special diets catered for Regular entertainments environment. Both homes cater for people with challenging behaviour. • Serene and picturesque gardens • Both homes rated 'GOOD' by CQC Within easy reach of the greenery of Ealing Common, our homes are • Visitors welcome Short Stay and Respite Care nonetheless ideally located for all transport links and the lively town centre. • Passenger lift at Kenilworth Nursing Home Both homes have single room facilities as well as spacious and We would be very pleased to have the opportunity to tell you more about comfortable living areas – Kenilworth has 2 lounges. We also provide 24 Kenilworth and Rainbow Lodge Nursing Homes, so for further information or hour RMN Qualified Nursing Cover to ensure your loved ones get the to arrange a visit contact us now and ask for the Manager, Mr Chris Gopaul attention they need.
    [Show full text]
  • Update from Nick Hurd MP
    Subscribe Past Issues Translate RSS September 2017 Update View this email in your browser u,entDctoine satr The work goes on in Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner. I hope you and your family had a wonderful summer. This bulletin is part of a regular series that updates you on what I am doing as your Member of Parliament. HS2 At long last, we have a signed legal agreement with HS2 covering their commitments to reduce their impact on the area during both construction and operation. For more detail and comments click here. This agreement is in many ways a beginning and not an end. There is still a lot to pin down and press for. Residents and I continue to be very frustrated with the way that HS2 engage with us, and as you will see from my latest letter to them, I am pressing for early dialogue with the contractors that have to deliver the project. Local Health Northwood and Pinner Cottage Hospital Progress at last. As you may recall, I have been pressing the NHS for ages to redevelop this decaying site in a way that respects the past and retains community health facilities. I have been now assured that their preference is to move ahead with a redevelopment that will move the existing Northwood Health Centre into the main hospital site and upgrade it. The rest of the site would be new residential. The intention is to start discussions with Hillingdon Planning before the end of the year. My own preference would be for the new residential accommodation to include an element of sheltered/extra care accommodation because I think we will need it.
    [Show full text]