75+I 1 7 7% 26% 12% 56% 83% 17% 6% 16% 1 13% 9% 9% Average Average 1 1% 25% Male household size: (3%)

2 25+ 0-4 60+ 1+16+9+13+95-11 Age 18-59 12-17 3% DRC (27%) May 2019

Burundi Somalia (2%) South Sudan (65%) 2% 2 3 4 1 Demographics 8%

2+20+8+13+9 9% Female 3 13% Top countries of origin: Top

20% 7+26+12+56 67% 83+17+6 Displacement demographics Property Housing REFUGEES IN UGANDA REFUGEES IN Female-headed POPULATION PROFILE OF PROFILE POPULATION households (HHs): ☪ Disabled members TOP 3 HLP CHALLENGES Female-headed HHs HHs WITH VULNERABLE MEMBERS HHs reporting member with persons with specific needs (PSN) card: Land accessed for housing HHs reporting that some members are not registered as refugees: Pregnant / lactating women Unaccompanied/separated child,orphan Unaccompanied/separated child,orphan of the Prime Minister (OPM) population figures updated as of April 2019. of the Prime Minister (OPM) population figures updated as of Funded by Union European and Civil Protec�on Aid Humanitarian challenges. The level of confidence may thus be lower than 95%. challenges. settlement leadership, including Office of the Prime Minister Prime the of Office including leadership, settlement (OPM) commandants and UNHCR staff, refugee welfare committee leaders, district local government officials, and key partners working in relevant sectors. Semi-structured refugee with conducted and gender by stratified were FGDs and host community groups in each location. refugee representative of this factsheet are in Findings total of A households living in 3 divisions of . Kampala in 122 refugee households were interviewed Central Division. informant interviews discussions (KIIs) and focus group household-level The quantitative survey produced (FGDs). for the refugee population results representative in 30 refugee settlements (considered as districts, as Adjumani) across 11 combined settlements in 25 due to five well as select (, Kampala Central, and ) with a 95% confidence level and the settlement 10% margin of error at level for all questions total of 3,165 households A size. asked to the entire sample All questions were interviewed for this assessments. referring to a subset are footnoted. KIIs and FGDs were used to triangulate the data and provide context to quantitative findings. KIIs targeted A mixed methods approach was used, driven by a was used, mixed methods approach A semi-structured key household-level survey, structured METHODOLOGY Recently arrived 1

Figures based on United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and Office

Respondents could answer more than one option for this question. This question was only asked to the 15% of respondents facing HLP

3 1 2

♏

and Housing, Land, and Property and Land, Housing, and Refugee Access to Livelihoods Livelihoods to Access Refugee income neighborhoods including Kamwookya, Kisenyi and Kampala's Industrial Area. The division comprises 20 parishes. Area. Kisenyi and Kampala's Industrial income neighborhoods including Kamwookya, Kololo. These areas are the most upscale business and residential neighborhoods in the city. The division also incorporates low neighborhoods in the city. These areas are the most upscale business and residential Kololo. comprises the central business district of Kampala and includes the areas of Old Kampala, and Nakasero Kampala, Old of areas the includes and Kampala of district business central the comprises division Central Kampala

BRIEF OVERVIEW OF KAMPALA CENTRAL DIVISION BRIEF OVERVIEW OF KAMPALA CONTEXT

within Uganda. sustainable livelihoods and potential movement the linkages, and other factors influencing of refugee access to livelihoods and HLP, provide a better understanding of the conditions livelihoods and The HLP. assessment aims to collect baseline data on refugees' access to 3 December 2018 to 15 March 2019 2019 to December 2018 to 15 March 2019 3

(NRC), REACH conducted an assessment from assessment an conducted REACH (NRC), In partnership with Norwegian Refugee Council impact their potential for sustainable livelihoods. housing, land, and property (HLP) for refugees information gaps on how access to or lack of varying lengths of displacement, there are key the range of countries of origin, and the the range of countries decades. Due to the large number of refugees, decades. Due

other refugees that have lived in Uganda for refugees have joined Rwandese, Somali, and Congo (DRC), and Burundi. South Sudan, the Democratic Republic of refugees and asylum seekers, primarily from of refugees in the region with over 1.2 million of refugees in the region Uganda is currently hosting the largest number 1 UGANDA KAMPALA ☇☄ HOUSING CENTRAL DIVISION HHs perceiving themselves at risk of eviction: 25% TENURE ARRANGEMENTS %⚯ of HHs by shelter tenure: Average♺ number of individuals per room: 4 99% Rented SHELTER CHALLENGES 1% Owned by other family members (rent free) 28% of HHs reported shelter damage. Of those, the most commonly reported parts of the shelter damaged are:3 68+44+35 99+1+I Damage to roof 68% 66% of HHs have documentation proving ownership or ⛈ legal occupancy of shelter. Damage to wall material 44% Damage to floor 35% Of those, the most commonly reported types of documentation are:3 71% of HHs reported not being able to conduct repairs. Of 84+11+4 those, the most commonly reported reasons include:3 Rental receipt 84% 71+38+13 ⛎ Rental agreement 11% No money for repair 71% Other receipt 4% Waiting for landlord to repair shelter 38% ⛎ Not allowed 13% Of the 91% of HHs who reported their renting costs:

Average monthly rent: 351,133 UGX % of HHs reporting members do not feel safe 18% 22% Of those, proportion of income spent on rent: in their current shelter: 43+35+22 Around half 43% 18+82I 22+78I More than half 35% Female Male Less than half 22%

3 41% of HHs reported having sometimes, often or always

% of renting HHs by person90+8+2 they are paying the rent to: visible wastewater in the vicinity (30 meters or less) of their Host community household 90% accommodation in the 30 days prior to data collection Other refugee household 8% Other 2% LAND

ACCESS TO LAND % of HHs reporting:3 ⚉ Method of accessing land around shelter plot:

71+24+3 62% Renting to access someone else's land No access to any land 71% 14% Accessing someone else's land for free Accessing land where shelter is located 24% 10% The household owns the land Accessing land in a separate plot 3% 10% Other 62+14+10+10+4+I 4% The household uses land where they have not been granted access

Funded by European Union 2 Civil Protec�on and Humanitarian Aid UGANDA KAMPALA HLP Challenges CENTRAL DIVISION

15% of HHs reported facing HLP challenges. Of those: HLP ISSUE RESOLUTION Most commonly reported areas of HLP issues (% of HLP 9% of the 19 HLP issues reported were attempted to

3 83+17+6+ issues): be resolved by the HHs Housing 83% Property 17% 6% Out of the HLP issues that HHs attempted to resolve, Land accessed for housing the following mechanisms were used:3 42+25+8 Most commonly reported types of HLP issues (% of HLP Family 42% 3 LC1 chairperson/local gov official 25% issues): 58+42+26 Payment issue dispute 58% NGO 8% Eviction 42% Theft 26% 8% of the HLP issues reported were resolved

☮ ACCESS TO PROPERTY INFORMATION

Most commonly reported sources and types of 89% of HHs reported having no property at all. 3 Out of the 11% who do: information HHs access: ♁ HHs with income-generating ♧ 80+26+23 Family and friends 80% property: 5% Source Local councils 26% 23% Most commonly reported type of property:3 OPM/UNHCR 4+3+3 Physical structure for shop/small business 4% Sewing machine 3% 43+33+23 Vehicle 3% Type of Registration 43% of HH reported participating in livelihoods groups information Safety 33% 92% of property items are owned by Availability of services 23% one owner.

Proportion of those by sex of 50% Female owner: 50% Male 86% of HHs reported trusting the information they receive of HHs that own property/assets50 reported+50I having 62% documentation proving ownership or legal access Most commonly reported information needs of HHs:3 % of HHs by number of income-generating property items reportedly owned: 65+35+29 Employment opportunities 65% 95% Zero income-generating items Availability of services 35% 5% One income-generating item Safety 29% 0% Two income-generating items 95+5+0+0+I 0% Three income-generating items Funded by European Union 3 Civil Protec�on and Humanitarian Aid UGANDA LIVELIHOODS KAMPALA ★ CENTRAL DIVISION

HHs reporting perceived livelihoods challenges: 97% LIVELIHOODS SOURCES SKILLS AND ASPIRATIONS

Out of the 82% of HHs who reported having a source 74% of HHs have men of working age and 80% of HHs have of income, the most commonly reported sources are:3 women of working age. Of those: 26+15+12 Remittances 26% Most commonly reported livelihoods skills gained in country Cook 15% of origin:3 Sales 12%

Most commonly reported livelihood groups HH Driving 21% Domestic work in the home 46% 3 Sales 14% Cook 21%

members participate in: 5+4+4 Casual labour 12% Hairdressing 12% Savings and Credit Cooperative Organizations 5% Business association 4% Village Savings and Loan Associations 4% Most commonly reported livelihoods aspirations:3

Most commonly reported livelihoods challenges:3 68+37+34 Lack of work opportunities 68% Driving 29% Sales 23% Lack of credit to start/continue a business 37% Computer 24% Cook 19% Low wages 34% Sales 16% Computer 17%

MOVEMENTS⚞ WITHIN UGANDA

PAST MOVEMENTS MOVEMENT INTENTIONS % of HHs that had at least one % of HHs that have at least one member move in the year prior to 6% member planning to move in the 6 data collection: months following data collection: 6% Of those: 6+94I Of those: 6+94I Most commonly reported reasons for moving:3 Most commonly reported reasons for planned movement:3 29+14+14 43+43+29 Security 29% Presence of food distribution 43% ☄ Presence of health services 14% Presence of shelter 43% Presence of education services 14% Availability of local food 29%

50% of the HHs with at least one member who moved reported that they receive resources from the member that moved

Funded by European Union 4 Civil Protec�on and Humanitarian Aid