DOCSLIB.ORG

EFFECT of ROOT PRUNING PRIOR to TRANSPLANTING on ESTABLISHMENT of SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA in the LANDSCAPE by Edward F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EFFECT of ROOT PRUNING PRIOR to TRANSPLANTING on ESTABLISHMENT of SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA in the LANDSCAPE by Edward F Journal of Arboriculture 18 (4): July 1992 197 EFFECT OF ROOT PRUNING PRIOR TO TRANSPLANTING ON ESTABLISHMENT OF SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA IN THE LANDSCAPE by Edward F. Gilman Abstract. Roots of field-grown southern magnolia However, a portion of regenerated roots can origi- (Magnolia grandiflora) were pruned once during dormancy, nate from at least 4 inches (10 cm) behind the cut, following the first shoot growth flush or after the second growth depending on species (10). This likely accounts flush, prior to transplanting in the winter. During the first year after transplanting, root pruned trees grew at a slightly faster for the increase in fibrous roots within the root ball rate than unpruned trees but growth rates were similar for root in response to root pruning reported for a number pruned and unpruned trees the second and third year after of species (9,18). Lower shoot:root ratios were transplanting. There was nodifference in post-transplantgrowth induced by root pruning (2,16), and were associ- among root pruning treatments. Trees required, at most, 1 year per inch of trunk caliper to become established in the ated with improved post-transplant tree seedling landscape. performance (3). However, others report no benefit to survival and post-transplant growth from pre- Root pruning of trees in fruit, forest and transplant root pruning seedling-sized forest landscape tree nurseries is an old and varied species (6,14). practice (11). It has been used as a horticultural The objective of this experiment was to tool to produce a sturdier tree, force development measure the effects of root pruning prior to of a more compact, fibrous root system, retard top transplanting on survival and growth of landscape- growth and increase transplant survival and post- sized southern magnolia for three years following transplant growth (14). The timing, frequency, transplanting. Previous work only reported on the severity and location of root pruning are governed first year after transplanting (8). more by practical experience and tradition than by scientific studies. Only recently have the effects of Materials and Methods root pruning on pre- and post-transplant treegrawth Southern magnolia trees from #3 (3 gal. -10 been studied. Gilman and Kane (8) suggested liter) containers were planted in rows on 8 ft X 13 that post-transplant tree growth may be related to ft (2.5 m x 4 m) spacing in the fall of 1984 on a the distribution of roots among diameter classes Chandler fine sand near Gainesville, Florida. Irri- within the root ball and that transplanted trees may gation (0.8 gal -3 liters/tree) was applied through benefit from treatments encouraging a high fine- microspray stakes generally daily except during root:coarse-root dry-weight ratio. Root pruning rainy periods and winter. Nitrogen was applied to may increase fine-root production in the root ball. a 10 ft2 (1 m2) circular area around each tree as According to Kramer and Kozlowski (12), each ammonium nitrate at 6 Ib N/1000 ft2 (482 kg/ha) / species has a characteristic shootroot ratio. When yr divided into 5 equal applications. Glyphosate the ratio is changed, as it is in transplanting, plants was periodically applied to control weeds in a 3.2 respond by redirecting assimilates to replace the ft (1 m)-wide strip centered on the tree line down removed parts. Root pruning, while reducing shoot each row. growth, stimulates rootgrowth as the plant attempts Thirty-two trees were root pruned in 1987 at to restore the pre-pruning shoot:root ratio (13,15). each of the following times: 1) mid-dormant sea- Roots regenerated in response to root pruning son - February, 2) just following the first shoot originate primarily at or just behind the cut (5,19). growth flush, after a terminal bud formed - June, Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series No. R-02193. Supported in part by a grant from the ISA Research Trust. 198 Gilman: Root Pruning of Magnolia and 3) following the second growth flush - October. ing. Root-pruned plants were shorter and had less Root pruning cuts were made with a sharpened caliper at transplanting than the nonpruned controls hand-spade inserted to a 12-inch (30-cm)-depth at but there was no significant difference in height or 60° from the horizontal in a circle 14 inches (38 cm) stem caliper among pruned and nonpruned trans- in diameter centered around the trunk. Thirty-seven planted trees one growing season following trans- trees were not root-pruned. Irrigation (2.1 gal. - 8 planting (Figures 1 & 2). This showed that root- liters/tree) was applied to all plants, including con- pruned trees grew at a slightly faster, yet significant, trols, in the study for 7 days following a root pruning rate than trees which were not root pruned. Growth treatment. Treatments were arranged in a random- rate during the first year on all transplanted trees ized complete block design with 4-tree replications/ was much slower than on trees that were not treatment in each of 8 blocks (rows), totaling 32 transplanted, butthere were nodifferences in growth trees/treatment. rate during the second and third year after trans- Five trees (1 from each of 5 randomly chosen planting (Figures 1 & 2). Since the growth rate in the blocks) from each of the 4 treatments (for a total of second and third year on transplanted trees matched 20 trees) were dug on Jan 20,1988 with a 20-inch that on trees that were not moved, 3 1 /4-cm (1 1/4- (50-cm)-diameter root ball according to American inch)-caliper southern magnolia were established Association of Nurseryman standards (1). Soil was within one year after transplanting. Establishment washed immediately from the root ball with a stream period may be shorter further south in USDA har- of water. Roots were separated into 3 diameter diness zones 9 through 11 (4), but can be one year classes: 1) 0-2 mm, 2) > 2-5 mm and 3) > 5-10 mm, (or longer) per inch (2.54 cm) caliper further north and dried at 70°C to constant weight. These data (7,17). Root pruning prior to transplanting had no were reported earlier (8). effect on rate of establishment. Sixteen trees (2 from each of the 8 blocks) from Establishment period has been defined as the the nonpruned, and pruned February, June and time required to completely replace the root system October treatments (total 64 trees) were trans- to the same size as it was before transplanting (7) planted on Feb 17, 1988 with a 20-inch (50-cm)- or the time required for shoot growth rate to match diameter root ball using a 2-blade mechanical tree that on the tree prior to transplanting (17). Shoot spade. Trees were lifted into the air about 3.2 ft (1 growth rate will probably match pre-transplanting m) to assure that all roots were severed, then growth rate just as the root system is completely lowered back into the original hole. A 4-inch (10- replaced, and further studies are under way to cm)-high soil ridge was constructed around each confirm this. tree to retain water. Sixteen nonpruned trees were This study was conducted under nearly ideal not transplanted to serve as a second control. post-transplanting conditions, with irrigation applied Irrigation (0.8 gal - 3 liters/tree) was applied daily, daily the first year following transplanting, and it except when it rained, during 1988. Irrigation was shows what can be accomplished with adequate applied every otherday during 1989 and 1990. Tree irrigation following transplanting. Unfortunately, height and stem caliper were measured at trans- most trees planted in urban environments do not planting and in February 1989, 1990 and 1991. A receive irrigation as frequently as this, and this may randomized complete block design analysis of significantly increase the time required to establish variance with 8 blocks and 4 treatments was per- a tree in the landscape. If resources are directed to formed for each measured variable each year. deliver frequent irrigation immediately following Mean separation was accomplished with Duncan's transplanting, the establishment period in the urban multiple-range test at the 5% level. Slopes of re- landscape may approach those reported in these gression curves were compared among treatments studies, and tree survival may increase. using the GLM procedure in SAS at the 5% level. These results question the wisdom of the often discussed, sometimes implemented, practice of Results and Discussion root pruning previously unpruned landscape-sized All 64 transplanted trees survived transplant- southern magnolia prior to transplanting. Although Journal of Arboriculture 18 (4): July 1992 199 O Check • Feb. pruned O Check V June pruned • Feb. pruned • Oct. pruned V June pruned D Unpruned T Oct. pruned • Unpruned Year Figure 1. Height of southern magnolia trees one Figure 2. Trunk caliper of southern magnolia trees year before transplanting, at transplanting and one, one year before transplanting, at transplanting and two and three years after transplanting. Check trees one, two and three years after transplanting. Check were not root pruned in the nursery and they were trees were not root pruned in the nursery and they not transplanted. were not transplanted. root pruning increased the ratio of fine roots to Conclusions coarse roots, trees with higher ratios (more fine 1) Root pruning southern magnolia prior to roots) grew only slightly more the first year follow- transplanting corresponded to only slightly better ing transplanting (8) compared to trees having a post-transplant growth the first year following low fine-root:coarse-root ratio which were not transplanting. There was no difference in growth pruned. During the second and third year root- rate between root-pruned and nonpruned trees pruned trees grew at the same rate as trees that the second and third year after transplanting.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Equipment for Handling & Selecting Plants
    Equipment for handling & selecting plants “ Index We are ready to serve you 4 About TTA 12 Clients 14 Innovation 16 Employees 18 Service 20 Headquarters 24 TTA USA, LLC 28 Sectors 30 Forestry 32 Pot plants 34 Bedding plants 36 Vegetables 38 Soft fruits 40 Herbs 42 Equipment 44 Transplanting 48 Selecting 50 Gapping 100% 52 Various 56 Projects 58 Plant grippers 60 Imaging systems 62 Why TTA? 66 Get in touch 2 3 About TTA TTA is a Dutch enterprise, founded in 1996. Since the start of the company, TTA has been focusing on the production of equipment for handling and selecting young living plants. TTA developed and expanded merely thanks to client requests for more or new machi- nery. TTA offers its clients a wide range of equipment, suiting the needs of professional growers. TTA strongly believes that quality and control are of the utmost importance. Therefore, the entire development, software, production, installation, sales and service are available in- house. Our experienced sales team is dedicated to fulfilling our clients’ wishes. The main goal of this partnership is to find the most suitable equipment. Reducing production costs and increasing efficiency are key. ‘Handle with care’ is TTA’s slogan when it comes down to young plants. We are proud to say that the majority of globally produced plants is handled by TTA equipment. The TTA team is ready to serve you! 4 5 Simon den Hartigh Anne den Hartigh Owner Founder Active in 30 countries over 6 continents Family-owned business Member of Eurogroep TTA is founded by Anne den Hartigh with the goal to deliver the fastest transplanter in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Horticulture Fact Sheet # 7 Growing Transplants USING
    Community Horticulture Fact Sheet # 7 Growing Transplants USING TRANSPLANTS WHERE TO START SEEDS Two tips for productive gardening are: Warmth and moisture are more 1. Always have plenty of young important than direct light for sprouting seedlings around to fill in empty most seeds. Once seedlings are up spots in your garden. (For example, though, they should be moved to a where carrots did not come up well place that gets at least six hours of or where slugs ate half of your direct sunlight a day. A large south spinach seedlings.) window may work or plants can go into 2. Grow early and late (fall-winter) a cold frame, if the weather is not too crops using varieties selected for cold. If plants lean dramatically towards these seasons. the window and get spindly, fluorescent lights are the answer. A four-foot long, two-bulb fixture is adequate for two full nursery flats of plants. Inexpensive 40- watt cool white bulbs are as good as the more costly full-spectrum “plant light” bulbs for growing transplants. These lights are not as strong as The key to putting both of these secrets sunlight! They must be positioned 2-3 to work for you is to start as many crops inches away from the plants’ tops. as possible indoors in containers (or (Mounting them with link chains allows outside in a cold frame). Then easy movement.) They should be kept transplant them into the garden when on 16-18 hours a day. (An you need them. Using transplants gives appliance timer is a you a two-week to two-month head start handy addition to in the spring plus a big jump on your set-up.) succeeding crops, since you always have established plants to put into the Ideal temperatures for most seeds garden instead of just seeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeding and Transplanting One for Blackbird, One for the Crow, One for the Cutworm, and One to Grow
    Seeding and Transplanting One for blackbird, one for the crow, one for the cutworm, and one to grow. ~ American saying Indoors or Outdoors? What crops are best started indoors in containers? Plants that can tolerate root disturbance and will benefit from a jump on the season are best to start indoors. You can find this information on seed packets and in planting guides. • Cool weather crops such as broccoli, cauliflower, and cabbage can be transplanted into the garden up to a month before the last danger of frost. • Warm weather crops, like tomatoes, peppers, and melons, should be transplanted into the garden after all danger of frost is past in your area. • Flowers planting requirements vary, so check the seed packets. You can find your average last frost dates by asking local gardeners or your Cooperative Extension Office (Master Gardeners). What crops are better started outdoors? Some crops prefer to be started directly in the garden. Root crops such as carrots, radish and beets don't transplant well, nor do other crops such as corn, beans, peas, squash, melons, and cucumbers. Sometimes, caring for seeds directly sown in the garden is a challenge at schools (e.g., protecting them from pests, keeping seed beds watered). In that case, you can start corn, beans, peas, squash, melons, and cucumbers in containers. However, you should do so in larger individual containers rather than the pricking out method described above. Seeding Outdoors Direct sowing methods Seeds planted directly in the garden can be drilled (poked), broadcast (sprinkled) or planted in little furrows (lines).
    [Show full text]
  • 119 Transplanting Guide
    TRANSPLANTING GUIDE Planting guide covers: Selecting high-quality nursery trees Handling, transporting and storing nursery trees Transplanting ball and burlap, container and bare root trees Post-planting maintenance 1. Selecting high-quality nursery trees The goal in selecting nursery plants is to purchase those plants most likely to become successfully established and to mature in the landscape in order to meet design expectations with a minimum of maintenance. To do that, choose plants with good root systems and healthy, well-formed and undamaged crowns and trunks. In addition, any plant that you purchase should have a professional pedigree: grown in a nursery, dug and prepared for shipping by trained workers, and maintained properly while awaiting purchase. That is, buy plants from nurseries with good reputations and whose people you trust. Chances are that plants from reputable nurseries will have been treated properly and will establish reliably. There are specific characteristics to look for (and look out for) when selecting nursery plants. a. Trunk and Branch Characteristics 1. Buy plants that have a form typical of the species. 2. Shoots should show good vigor and growth. 3. Branches should be well-spaced and have good branch attachment. Avoid narrow branch attachments that may have included bark. 4. Crowns should be reasonably free of wounds and/or evidence of insect damage and/or disease. 5. Avoid top-heavy trees and plants that have been severely headed back. 6. Trunks should be straight, free from wounds or diseases and show trunk flare and proper trunk taper. b. Foliage Characteristics 1. Foliage should have good color, with no sign of insect pests and/or diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Illinois Agricultural Extension Station Circular
    ~.}..- ~J~6~+ JlHIVERSI1Y-{)f I CIRCULAR 884 IGRICULTURE , lI~~ CIRCULATtNG COpy AGRICULT U E LIBRARY. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE . COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE GROWING VEGETABLE TRANSPLANTS CONTENTS Plant-Growing Structures 4 Coldframes and hotbeds 4 Greenhouse structures 6 Soils and Fertility.. .. 8 Seed-sowing media 8 Plant-growing media 9 How to compost soil ... 10 Preparation of field soils. .10 Seeding and Germination .12 Seed quality, quantity, and variety . .1 2 When to sow seeds. 12 Germination requirements .. .14 Seeding and spacing pointers. .16 Transplanting Seedlings ..... 17 Containers for Plant Growing. .20 Management of Environmental Conditions. .23 Light conditions . ...... .23 Temperature and ventilation . .23 Watering practices ..... .23 Spacing recommendations . 24 Supplemental feeding .. .24 Plant hardening ...... .25 Insects, Diseases, and Related Problems. .25 Soil treatment . ... .. .... .25 Seed treatment ........... .26 Postemergence disease control. .26 Sanitation practices ... .... 28 Techniques for Specific Vegetable Crops ... .29 This circular was prepared by ]. W. COURTER, Assistant Professor of Horticulture, and]. S. VANDEMARK, Profes­ sor of Horticulture. HflllIIlIIlIlIUl1l1l1l1ll11l1l11l11l11l11l11l11ll1l1lllll11 II IIII III 111111 111111111 IIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111 Urbana, Illinois March, 1964 Cooperative Extension Work in Agriculture
    [Show full text]
  • Eelgrass (Zostera Marina L.) Restoration in the Pacific Northwest
    TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENTS CATALOG NO WA-RD 706.1 4. TITLE AND SUBTILLE 5. REPORT DATE Eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) Restoration in the Pacific August 2008 Northwest: Recommendations to improve project success 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Ronald Thom1, Jeff Gaeckle2, Amy Borde1, Michael Anderson1, Matthew Boyle3, Cynthia Durance4, Michael Kyte5, Paul Schlenger6, Jason Stutes7, Don Weitkamp8, Sandy Wyllie- Echeverria9, Steve Rumrill10 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. 1Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Marine Sciences Laboratory 1529 West Sequim Bay Road 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. Sequim, WA 98382 2Washington State Department of Natural Resources PO Box 47000 1111 Washington Street SE Olympia, WA 98504-7000 3Grette and Associates 2102 North 30th Street, Suite A Tacoma, WA 98403 4 Precision Identification Biological Consultants British Columbia, Canada 5ENSR 1011 SW Klickitat Way Seattle, WA 98134-1162 6 Anchor Environmental, L.L.C. 1423 3rd Avenue, Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98101 7PENTEC Environmental/Hart Crowser, Inc. 120 Third Ave. So. Edmonds, WA 98020 8Parametrix, Inc. 1002 15th St SW, Suite 220 Auburn, WA 98001 9University of Washington School of Marine Affairs 3707 Brooklyn Avenue NE Seattle, WA 98105 10South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve P.O. Box 5417 Charleston, OR 97420 12. CPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE 1 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES This study was conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. ABSTRACT We summarize eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) restoration and mitigation project results and recommendations of transplant practitioners in the Pacific Northwest since 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Transplants in Vegetable Production
    PUBLICATION 8013 Using Transplants in Vegetable Production WAYNE L. SCHRADER, UC Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor, San Diego County egetables grown from transplants can be harvested earlier than those grown V from seed. Growers who use transplants can target early-season markets and UNIVERSITY OF reduce the time needed to produce a crop, allowing them to produce a second or CALIFORNIA third crop during a single growing season. Transplants grown in the greenhouse can Division of Agriculture be protected efficiently against environmental stress, disease pathogens, and insect and Natural Resources pests. Transplants can allow growers to establish near-perfect stands, optimal spac- ing, and uniform physiological plant age within field blocks. http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu Where the cost of seed is very high, the use of transplants may actually reduce the cost of establishing a vegetable planting because less seed is used and the need for thinning and early weeding is eliminated. Transplants also allow more efficient use of fertilizer and irrigation water during early growth stages. Transplanting is both labor intensive and capital intensive. The successful pro- duction of transplants requires sterilized growth media, temperature and light con- trol, effective pest and disease management, and appropriate sanitation practices. PLANT ADAPTATION When seedlings are moved from the greenhouse to the field, they undergo tranplant shock (a setback in growth). How quickly a plant overcomes this shock and estab- lishes itself in the field depends on plant type, environmental conditions, quality of transplants produced, field preparation, and handling during the transplant process. Different plant species vary greatly in their suitability for transplanting.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Cabbage
    Agriculture and Natural Resources FSA6066 Home Gardening Series Chinese Cabbage Craig R. Andersen Environment Associate Professor and Extension Specialist ­ Light – sunny Soil – well­drained Vegetables Fertility – medium to rich pH – 5.8 to 7.5 Temperature – cool season Moisture – moist Culture Planting – transplant Spacing – 12­18 x 36 inches Hardiness – hardy biennial Fertilizer – medium feeder Chinese Cabbage – Brassica rapa var! Baby Pak Choy has small, loose green chinensis leaves and crispy green petioles. Napa, referred to as Bok Choy, is the Brassica rapa var! most popular family of the Chinese pekinesis cabbages seen in markets in both the West and the Orient. The plant forms Chinese cabbage is indigenous to a barrel­shaped head with light green China, where it has been cultivated leaves and petioles when mature. for over a thousand years. Its name is There are several varieties of semi­ quite misleading. Chinese cabbage is heading types referred to a Michihili more closely related to turnips and cabbages. The upright plant is rutabagas than cabbages. generally wrapped with long leaves Most Chinese brassicas are called forming a long, tapering head while Chinese cabbage in the West. There growing up to 2 feet tall. are many kinds of Chinese cabbages. Chinese cabbage’s mild flavor is They are grouped by size, shape and similar to that of celery and cabbage whether heading or non­heading. (although Chinese cabbage is not Some of the more common ones are related to celery), and its leaves are ‘Pei Tsai’ and ‘Tatsoi,’ small, loose leaf thinner and more delicate than those types. Chinese cabbages are fast­ Arkansas Is of cabbage.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Starting Seeds Indoors: Tips & Troubleshooting Advice for Starting Healthy Seedlings
    Guidelines for Starting Seeds Indoors: Tips & Troubleshooting Advice for Starting Healthy Seedlings 955 Benton Ave., Winslow, ME 04901 • Phone: 1-877-564-6697 • Fax: 1-800-738-6314 Email: [email protected] • Website: Johnnyseeds.com Starting your own seeds is a great way to extend the growing season, grow a wider selection of varieties, and save money. Here are some general tips and troubleshooting advice for growers who are starting seeds indoors. 5 BENEFITS OF STARTING PLANTS FROM SEEDS INDOORS • Gives you access to a wider selection of seed varieties. When purchasing seedlings, you are limited by availability. • Gives you a jump toward a productive growing season. Seedlings a few weeks old can be transplanted outside as soon as soil and air temperatures are warm enough. This enables you to achieve an earlier harvest. Crops with a long maturity period can be started early enough for them to produce a harvestable crop. Crops with a short maturity period can be sown in succession, to keep the harvest coming week after week. Seedlings started in flats at our • Gives you greater control over the health of your research farm in Albion, Maine. seedlings. You can optimize conditions to produce the healthiest possible outcome. Starting your own seeds also decreases the potential risk of introducing pathogens or pests from purchased seedlings. • Helps you grow the exact number of plants you need. In comparison, direct seeding can result in spotty germination. Gaps in a direct-seeded stand can occur from variables difficult to control such as unfavorable temperatures, precipitation, or seed predation by birds, mammals, or insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland Restoration with Hydrophytes: a Review
    plants Review Wetland Restoration with Hydrophytes: A Review Maria A. Rodrigo Integrative Ecology Group, Cavanilles Institute for Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, Catedrático José Beltrán 2, Paterna, 46980 Valencia, Spain; [email protected] Abstract: Restoration cases with hydrophytes (those which develop all their vital functions inside the water or very close to the water surface, e.g., flowering) are less abundant compared to those using emergent plants. Here, I synthesize the latest knowledge in wetland restoration based on revegetation with hydrophytes and stress common challenges and potential solutions. The review mainly focusses on natural wetlands but also includes information about naturalized constructed wetlands, which nowadays are being used not only to improve water quality but also to increase biodiversity. Available publications, peer-reviewed and any public domain, from the last 20 years, were reviewed. Several countries developed pilot case-studies and field-scale projects with more or less success, the large-scale ones being less frequent. Using floating species is less generalized than submerged species. Sediment transfer is more adequate for temporary wetlands. Hydrophyte revegetation as a restoration tool could be improved by selecting suitable wetlands, increasing focus on species biology and ecology, choosing the suitable propagation and revegetation techniques (seeding, planting). The clear negative factors which prevent the revegetation success (herbivory, microalgae, filamentous green algae, water and sediment composition) have to be considered. Policy- making and wetland restoration practices must more effectively integrate the information already known, particularly under future climatic scenarios. Keywords: revegetation; submerged macrophytes; floating macrophytes; aquatic phanerogams; charo- Citation: Rodrigo, M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Transplanting Trees
    Agricultural Extension Service The University of Tennessee SP 572 Transplanting Trees David S. Vandergriff Wayne K. Clatterbuck Area Specialist Associate Professor Ornamental Horticulture Forestry, Wildlife & Fisheries Successfully transplanting trees depends on deci- Trees experience tremendous stress in the trans- sions and production practices that take place long before planting process, primarily from adverse changes in their the first shovel of soil is turned. Selecting the right species ability to absorb water due to root loss. Water stress is the and high-quality nursery stock based on planting site char- primary cause of transplant failure. Root loss affects hor- acteristics, available care after planting, transplant size, root mone synthesis and distribution that regulate shoot growth. ball characteristics and nursery production practices is es- Root loss also reduces carbohydrate storage, affecting en- sential to successful transplanting. The rewards for atten- ergy available for rapid root regeneration, critical for trans- tion to these details will be realized as the transplanted tree plant survival. The ability of a tree to maintain sufficient matures and increases its importance to your property. vigor while recovering from the adversities of transplant- ing will determine its success or failure. Trees have traditionally been offered for sale in the nursery trade using three methods: bare-root, balled and burlapped (B&B), and containers including pot-in-pot and in-ground fabric containers. Bare–Root Bare-root production systems have several advan- tages. Bare-root trees can be produced less expensively than trees produced in other systems due to easier digging, stor- ing and shipping, since the soil is not kept with the roots when the tree is dug.
    [Show full text]
  • A Handbook of Constructed Wetlands
    A HANDBOOK OF CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS a guide to creating wetlands for: AGRICULTURAL WASTEWATER DOMESTIC WASTEWATER COAL MINE DRAINAGE STORMWATER in the Mid-Atlantic Region Volume 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people contributed to this Handbook. An interagency Core Group provided the initial impetus for the Handbook, and later provided guidance and technical input during its preparation. The Core Group comprised: Carl DuPoldt, USDA - NRCS. Chester, PA Melanie Sayers, Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Harrisburg, PA Robert Edwards, Susquehanna River Basin Commission, Fred Suffian, USDA - NRCS Philadelphia, PA Harrisburg, PA Charles Takita, Susquehanna River Basin Commission, Harrisburg, PA Lamonte Garber, Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Harrisburg. PA Harold Webster, Penn State University, DuBois, PA. Barry Isaacs, USDA - NRCS, Harrisburg, PA Jeffrey Lapp. EPA, Philadelphia, PA Timothy Murphy, USDA - NRCS, Harrisburg, PA Glenn Rider, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources, Harrisburg. PA Many experts on constructed wetlands contributed by providing information and by reviewing and commenting on the Handbook. These Individuals included: Robert Bastian. EPA .WashinSton, DC Robert Knight, CH2M HILL, Gainesville, FL Daniel Seibert, USDA - NRCS, Somerset, PA William Boyd, USDA - NRCS. Lincoln, NE Fran Koch, Pennsylvania Department of Jeffrey Skousen, West Virginia University, Robert Brooks, Penn State University, Environmental Resources, Harrisburg, PA Morgantown. WV University Park, PA Eric McCleary, Damariscotta, Clarion, PA Peter Slack, Pennsylvania Department of Donald Brown, EPA, Cincinnati, OH Gerald Moshiri, Center for Wetlands and Environmental Resources, Harrisburg, PA Dana Chapman, USDA - NRCS, Auburn, NY Eco-Technology Application, Gulf Breeze, Dennis Verdi, USDA - NRCS, Amherst, MA FL Tracy Davenport, USDA -NRCS, Annapolis, Thomas Walski, Wilkes University, Wilkes- MD John Murtha, Pennsylvania Department of Barre, PA Environmental Resources, Harrisburg.
    [Show full text]