Commercial Manufacture and Application of Micro-Fibrillated Cellulose in Paper and Paperboard
Per Svending, Imerys Mineral AB, Sweden September 17th 2015
Specialty Papers Conference Milwaukee WI, USA Publicised images of ”cellulose nanofibrils” show great diversity
A wide range of shapes and sizes made through different processes by companies, universities, and institutes across the world. FiberLean™ microfibrillated cellulose (MFC), a recent addition to the papermakers toolbox Surface micrograph of finepaper containing FiberLean MFC and filler The FiberLean™ MFC process
Co-grinding pulp to MFC in the presence of minerals. – The mineral acts as a very fine grinding media
Robust and reliable equipment of relevant industrial scale.
On-site manufacturing, using a minor side stream of mill pulp.
No pre-treatment of fiber required.
The FiberLean product is a MFC/mineral composite. Co-grinding pulp to MFC in the presence of mineral
• Relatively coarse fibrils. • Fibril length is important for wet end addition • A wide range of pulps can be used • Also flexible with regard to the mineral GCC PCC Kaolin Talc
TiO2
1 μm Commercial scale experience with FiberLean™ MFC
Packaging
Coated Woodfree
Specialty + mechanical
Uncoated Woodfree
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Basis weight, g/m2
Close to 50 full scale trials on 21 paper machines to date • In Europé, North America, South America and Asia. Trials ranging from a few hours to several days. Extensive experience across segments • 6 mills in UWF • 6 mills in speciality and mechanical paper • 8 mills in CWF • 2 mills in Packaging 3 commercial contracts for on-site MFC plants. Impact of MFC on paper strength
Tensile Burst 35 3
30 2 25 No MFC No MFC 20 3% MFC 1 3% MFC 15 5% MFC 5% MFC Tensile Index (Nm/g) Index Tensile Burst Index (kN/g) Index Burst
10 0 5 15 25 35 45 5 15 25 35 45 Paper filler content (%) Paper filler content (%)
Bond Tear 200 12 10 150 8 100 No MFC 6 No MFC 3% MFC 4 3% MFC 50
Scott Bond (J/m2) Bond Scott 5% MFC 5% MFC
Tear Index (mN.m2/g) Index Tear 2 0 0 5 15 25 35 45 5 15 25 35 45 Paper filler content (%) Paper filler content (%) It is possible to increase
Lab study filler by 10% or more and Mesmer recirculating hand sheets (12 sheets) 70% Eucalyptus, 30% NBSK, 550 CSF suffer no strength loss. Intracarb 60 filler Impact of MFC on paper tensile
Tensile Elongation 35 6
30 5 4 25 No MFC 3 No MFC 20 3% MFC 2 3% MFC 15 5% MFC 5% MFC Tensile Index (Nm/g) Index Tensile 1 Breaking elongation (%) elongation Breaking 10 0 5 15 25 35 45 5 15 25 35 45 Paper filler content (%) Paper filler content (%)
TEA Modulus 1400 2.5 1200 2 1000 800 1.5 No MFC No MFC 600 1 3% MFC 3% MFC 400 5% MFC 0.5 5% MFC 200 Youngs modulus (GPa) modulus Youngs 0 0
Tensile Energy Absorption (J/kg) Absorption Energy Tensile 5 15 25 35 45 5 15 25 35 45 Paper filler content (%) Paper filler content (%)
Lab study Mesmer recirculating hand sheets (12 sheets) 70% Eucalyptus, 30% NBSK, 550 CSF Intracarb 60 filler Behaviour of MFC in the tensile stress-strain curve
16
14
12
10
8 28% filler no MFC Force (N) 6 28% filler with 1,7% MFC
4
2
0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Displacement (mm)
Pilot study 80% Eucalyptus, 20% NBSK, 500 CSF Intracarb 60 filler Behaviour of MFC in the tensile stress-strain curve
16
14 + 24% Tensile 12
10
8 28% filler no MFC Force (N) 6 28% filler with 1,7% MFC
4 + 0,6 %-units of stretch 2 + 21% 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Displacement (mm)
Pilot study 80% Eucalyptus, 20% NBSK, 500 CSF Intracarb 60 filler Impact of MFC on paper tensile
Tensile Elongation 35 6
30 5 4 25 No MFC 3 No MFC 20 3% MFC 2 3% MFC 15 5% MFC 5% MFC Tensile Index (Nm/g) Index Tensile 1 Breaking elongation (%) elongation Breaking 10 0 5 15 25 35 45 5 15 25 35 45 Paper filler content (%) Paper filler content (%)
TEA Modulus 1400 2.5 1200 2 1000 800 1.5 No MFC No MFC 600 1 3% MFC 3% MFC 400 5% MFC 0.5 5% MFC 200 Youngs modulus (GPa) modulus Youngs 0 0
Tensile Energy Absorption (J/kg) Absorption Energy Tensile 5 15 25 35 45 5 15 25 35 45 Paper filler content (%) Paper filler content (%)
Lab study Mesmer recirculating hand sheets (12 sheets) 70% Eucalyptus, 30% NBSK, 550 CSF Intracarb 60 filler Impact of MFC on optical properties
Brightness Opacity 91 93 92 90 91 90 89 No MFC 89 No MFC 3% MFC 88 3% MFC Opacity (%) Opacity 88 87 5% MFC 5% MFC 86 87 85 Brightness (% at D65 – 400 nm) 400 – D65 at (% Brightness 5 15 25 35 45 5 15 25 35 45 Paper filler content (%) Paper filler content (%)
Scattering Absorption 900 5
800 4.5 g)) /g) 2 2/ 700 No MFC 4 No MFC K (cm K S (cm S 3% MFC 3% MFC 600 3.5 5% MFC 5% MFC
500 3 5 15 25 35 45 5 15 25 35 45 Paper filler content (%) Paper filler content (%)
Lab study Mesmer recirculating hand sheets (12 sheets) 70% Eucalyptus, 30% NBSK, 550 CSF Intracarb 60 filler Impact of MFC on other properties
Porosity Density 3500 0.7 3000 2500 0.65 2000 No MFC 0.6 No MFC 1500 3% MFC 3% MFC 1000 Density (g/cm3) Density 0.55 5% MFC 5% MFC 500 Porosity, Bentsen (ml/min) Bentsen Porosity, 0 0.5 5 15 25 35 45 5 15 25 35 45 Paper filler content (%) Paper filler content (%)
Initial drainage 10 • The porosity impact can be important for 8 hold-out of ink or coating colour. 6 No MFC • Density can be regained by trading the 4 3% MFC positive impact on smoothness and bond
Drainage time (sek) time Drainage 2 5% MFC strength with less intense calendering
0 and/or use of coarser fiber, such as CTMP. 5 15 25 35 45 • While initial drainage slows down there is a Paper filler content (%) positive impact on couch and press solids.
Lab study Mesmer recirculating hand sheets (12 sheets) 70% Eucalyptus, 30% NBSK, 550 CSF Intracarb 60 filler FiberLeanTM performance summary
Tensile Index 30% 20% 10% Density 0% Tear Index -10% -20% -30% -40% -50% -60%
Porosity Scott Bond
Opacity TEA
20% filler, No MFC 30% filler, 3% MFC
14 Date Title of the presentation Full scale results from adding FiberLean to increase filler level in a woodfree paper
5 2% MFC 4% MFC +8% filler +16% filler 4.5
4 MD Tensile 3.5 The strength of the paper
3 is maintained at increasing levels of filler and MFC. 2.5 CD Tensile
Tensile strength Tensile 2
1.5
1
0.5
0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Addition of FiberLean with 20% MFC content (%) Beyond the primary target application of filler increase in P&W papers there are new product development opportunities to pursue
Based on porosity reduction • Improved hold-out of coatings
Based on strength and opacity • De-materialisation Reduction in coat weight to reach a given gloss level Adding FiberLean™ MFC to specialty paper at constant filler loading all chemical pulp at 250 CSF and 20% filler
Tensile Bendtsen Energy Tear Index Scott Bond Opacity Porosity Absorption J/kg mN m 2 /g J/m 2 ml/min % Reference 792 5,7 209 258 87,8 1% MFC 924 5,7 288 180 88,2 2% MFC 859 5,8 291 114 88,3 4% MFC 1224 6,5 377 104 88,8
To facilitate applications like this FiberLean can be supplied at up to 50% MFC content with the balance being almost any type of mineral filler. Selecting correct filler loading to reach a given opacity and strength at minimum basis weight
No filler - minimum sheet weight for required opacity ) 2
Target strength and opacity Basis (g/m weight
No filler - minimum sheet No filler - minimum sheet weight weight for required opacity for required strength
Filler content (%) Selecting correct filler loading and sheet weight with FiberLean™ Pilot paper machine data
84% Opacity no mfc 84% Opacity 2% mfc 84% Opacity 3% mfc 84% Opacity 4% mfc
90
80
70
for for target 60 2
g/m 50
40
30 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Total Filler Loading Selecting correct filler loading and sheet weight with FiberLean™ Pilot paper machine data
84% Opacity no mfc 84% Opacity 2% mfc 84% Opacity 3% mfc 84% Opacity 4% mfc
90
80
70
for for target 60 2
g/m 50
40
30 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Total Filler Loading Selecting correct filler loading and sheet weight with FiberLean™ Pilot paper machine data
84% Opacity no mfc 84% Opacity 2% mfc 84% Opacity 3% mfc 84% Opacity 4% mfc
1,5 kN/m tensile strength no mfc 1,5 kN/m tensile strength 2% mfc 1,5 kN/m tensile strength 3% mfc 1,5 kN/m tensile strength 4% mfc 90
80
70
for for target 60 2
g/m 50
40
30 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Total Filler Loading Selecting correct filler loading and sheet weight with FiberLean™ Pilot paper machine data
84% Opacity no mfc 84% Opacity 2% mfc 84% Opacity 3% mfc 84% Opacity 4% mfc
1,5 kN/m tensile strength no mfc 1,5 kN/m tensile strength 2% mfc 1,5 kN/m tensile strength 3% mfc 1,5 kN/m tensile strength 4% mfc 90 Paper with no MFC 63 g/m2 58 g/m2 80 8% filler Fiber 84% opacity Paper with 2% MFC 1,5 kN/m tensile 53 g/m2 44 g/m2 Paper with 4% MFC 70 17% filler Fiber 48 g/m2 38 g/m2 84% opacity 21% filler Fiber 1,5 kN/m tensile 84% opacity for for target 60
2 1,5 kN/m tensile
g/m 50
40
30 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Total Filler Loading Summary and conclusions
MFC is now available for commercial use in papermaking
Filler increase in P&W paper is a key application
Several product development projects for packaging and specialty papers are ongoing
Using MFC and filler to tailor a paper grade to required opacity and strength targets with minimum material use offers one of the most exciting opportunities. Acknowledgements
To my colleagues at Imerys FiberLean R&D in Par Moor Centre in the UK who have done most of the test work, and especially to Dr Jon Phipps, who designed and ran the constant opacity/strength experiments. Thank you!
Source: Peter Callesen, www.petercallesen.com