DOCSLIB.ORG

' County, Oi Durham.. Charles Manners, K

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
' County, Oi Durham.. Charles Manners, K 944 borough of Carlisle.-^Presented by the Mayor ErdflS f-he fimabifonts of the town and parish of and a Deputation. D^ttdley, in the County of Worcester.—Presented From the Mayor, Aldermen, and Burgesses of the By C'&praiti Hawtes; M. P. borough of Louth, in the county of Lineofe.— Frewr.tiie Inhabitants of the borough of Bideford, in Presented by the Right Honourable Charks Ten- the corrnfy of Devon.—Presented by the Re- nyson d'Eyncourt, M-. P. corder. From the Mayor, Aldermen, Burgesses, and., other From the Inhabitants of the town, burgh, and li- Inhabitants of the ancient boreugh of God- berties of Machynlletfe,- in the county of. Mont- manchester.—Presented by Sir Frederick Pollock, gomery,.—Presented by Sir John Edwards, Bart. M. P. and Lieuteriaht-Colenel Peel, M. P. M. P. From the Mayor, Aldermen', Burgesses, and; other. ; From the Archdeafcon- and Clergy of the county- of Inhabitants of the borough of Huntingdon.—Pre- Nottingham.—Presented by the Bishop bf Lin- sented by Sir Frederick-Pottock, M. P. and Lieu- coln. -tenant-Colonel Peel, M. P. From the Bishop, Dean and Chapter, and Clergy of From the Mayor, Corporation, and other Inhabitants Lincoln, arid of the diocese thereto belonging.— of the town and county of Haverfordwest—Pre- Pres'ente'd by the Bishop of Lincoln. sented by the Mayor. From the Bishop and Clergy of the diocese of Ban- From- the Mayor, Aldermen,- and Town Councillors gor. — Presented by the Bishop of Bangor. of the borough of Tenby, in the county of Pem- From'the Archdeacon, Rural Deans, and Clergy of broke.—Presented by Sir Richard Bulkeley the archdeaconry of Salop, in the diocese of Philipps, Bart. M. P. Hereford.—Pressnled by the Bishop of Here- Fiom the Mayor, Recorder, and Council of the ford. ancient borough of Welshpool. —Presented by the From the Bishop of the diocese, and the Dean and Right Honourable Charles W. Williams Wynne. Prebendaries of the Cathedral Church of Win- From the Mayor, Aldermen, and Councillors of the chester. borough of Oswestry, Salop.—Presented by the From the Dean and Chapter of the Cathedral Church Mayor and Town Clerk. of Worcester.—Presented by the Bishop of From the Mayor, Aldermen, arid Burgesses of the Rochester. nncient city of Rochester.—Presented fiy Sir Ed- From the Minister and Seniors of the Swiss* Church mund Filriier, Bart. M. P. in London.— Presented ..by the Minister-and a Frorii the Mayor, Aldermen, and Councillors of the Deputation. borough of Swansea.—Presented by the Mayor, From the Cbapter.of trie Collegiate Church of South- accompanied by J. H. Vivian, Esq. M.P. well. From the Mayor, Aldermen, Town Council, and FVom the Catholic Clergy and Laity residing in the others the Inhabitants of the borough of Llanid- Metropolis and ii.s vicinity.—Presented by Lord. loes, in the county of Montgomery.—Presented Camoys and the Honourable Charles1 Langdale. by .the Mayor. From the Rector, Professors, and Students of the From the Mayor, Aldermen, and Burgesses of the Catholic College of Stonyh'urst, in the county of. borough of Congleton, in the county oi Chester. Lancaster". — Presented by the Honourable Charks — Presented by the Mayor and a Deputation. Larigdale. From the Mayor, Aldermen, and Burgesses of the .From the Roman Catholics inhabiting Hinckley. borough of Preston, in the county of Lancaster.— .From the Master, Wardens, arid Society of, Apothe- Presented by Sir Hesketh Fleetwood, Bart. M. P. ; caries of the city of London.—Presented by the and R. T. Parker, Esq. M. P. Master and a Deputation. From the Mayor, Aldermen, and Burgesses of the From the President; Council, and Fellows of the. city and borough of Ripon. — Presented by Sir Royal Medico-Botanical Society of London.— Edward Sugden, M. P. and Thomas; Pemberton, Presented by W. H. Judd, Esq. Esq. M. P. .From th« Members of the Colonial Society.—Pre-- From the Mayor, Aldermen, Council-., aod Inhabitants : sented.b'y the Earl.of Mount Cashcl and a-Depu- ot the borough of Llandovery, in the couoity of tation. Carmarthen.—Presented by Lieutenant-Colonel From the President, Council, .and Fellows of the the Honourable G. Rice Trevor, M. P. and John Linnean Society of London.—Presented by the Jones, Esq. M. P. Bishop of Norwich, President, and a Deputation. From the Mayor, Aldermen, Councillors, Burgesses, From the Vice-Patrons, President, Officers, and* and Inhabitants of the borough of St. Alban, in Members of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great the county of Hertford.—Presented by,the Mayor. Britain and Ireland.—Presented by the Right From the Nobility, Gentry, Clergy, and Freeholders Honourable Charles W. Willianas Wynne and the of the county of Stafford.—Presented by Mr. Pye, Right Honourable Sir Gore Ouseley, Bart.. High Sherifi" of the county. From the Governors and Proprietors, Council,. From the Gentry, Clergy, and Yeomen of the county Principal, &c. of King's College, London. of Cambridge and isle of Ely.—Presented by From the Scholars of the Royal Grammar School,, Mr. Mprtlock, Sheriff/and a Deputation. established in the borough of Louth, in the county From the Nobility, Gentry, Clergy, and other Inhabi- of Lincoln.—Presented by the Right Honourable- tants of the county of Huntingdon.—Presented Charles Tennyson d'Eyncoui t, M. P. by Mr. Mortlock, Sheriff, and a Deputation. From the Members of the Ilkeston Mechanics' In- From the Freeholders and other Inhabitants of the stitute.—Presented by Lieutenant-General. Lord< ' county, oi Durham.. Charles Manners, K. C. B...
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE LONDON GAZETTE, 3 JUNE, 1924. 4447 in the County of Lancaster
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 3 JUNE, 1924. 4447 In the county of Lancaster. 8. An Area comprising: — The county boroughs of St. Helens and In the county of Gloucester. Warrington. The borough of Leigh. The petty sessional division of Campden. The petty sessional division of Warrington, In the county of Oxford. and The parishes of Claydon, Clattercote, The parishes of Bold, Ashton-in-Makerfield, Mollington, Copredy, Bourton, Hamwell, Abram, Lowton, Kenyon, and Culcheth. Horley, Hornton, Wroxton, Dray ton, North Newington, East Shutford, West Shutford, In the county of Salop. Swalcliffe, Sibford Ferris, Sibford Gower, The borough of Oswestry. Epwell, Shenington, and Alkerton. The petty sessional division of Oswestry, and In the county of Northampton. The parishes of Ellesmere Rural, Bllesmere The borough of Daventry. Urban, Welshampton, Whitchurch Rural, Whitchurch Urban, Ightfield, and Ruyton of The petty sessional division of Daventry, the Eleven Towns. and The parishes of Upper Boddington, Lower In the county of Denbigh. Boddington, Bugbrooke, Kislingbury, Upton, The borough of Wrexham, and Harpole, Upper Heyford, Nether Hey ford, The petty sessional divisions of Bromfield, Floore, Brington, Althorp, Harlestone, Church liuabon, and Brampton, Chapel Brampton, Spratton, Holdenby, East Haddon, Ravensthorpe, The parish of Chirk. Teeton, Great Creaton, Cottesbrooke, Hollo- In the county of Flint. well, Coton, Guilsborough, Thornby, Cold The petty sessional divisions of Hope, and Ashby, Welford, Sulby, Hothorpe, Marston Overton, and the detached part of the petty Trussell, Sibertoft, Olipston, Naseby, Hasel- sessional division of Hawarden. bech, Kelmarsh, and Maidwell. 6. An Area comprising: — In the county of Worcester. In the couniy of Stafford. The borough of Stourbridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Review Portfolio Holders
    Appendix Title: Local Government Re-organisation – Judicial Review Portfolio Holders: Cllr Graham Payne, Leader Cllr Rod Eaton, Change and Integration Portfolio Holder Reporting Officer: Nicola Mathiason - Head of Legal and Democratic Services Andrew Pate - Chief Executive Key Decision: No ______________________________________________________________ Purpose • To decide whether to redirect the Council's legal efforts and resources, from a separate judicial review, to support for the Shrewsbury and Atcham and Congleton appeal. Background • On 8 August 2007 Cabinet agreed that the Council should commence legal proceedings for Judicial Review against the Secretary of State’s decision about Local Government Reorganisation in Wiltshire. The Council’s case has been ‘on hold’ until the result of the Shrewsbury and Congleton Judicial Review was known. The judgement in this case has now been delivered. The judicial review was unsuccessful. The High Court Judge held that the Secretary of State had common law powers available to her to carry out the process, that she did not have to be satisfied that a proposal met the criteria at the time of the assessment and that she had not acted irrationally. Key Issues • Advice has been taken from our Counsel (who also acts for Shrewsbury and Congleton) on whether we should now continue with our case in the light of the Shrewsbury judgement. We have been advised that unless the Shrewsbury judgement is appealed successfully we cannot effectively progress our case. The grounds of our case are similar and the arguments we would raise are much the same as Shrewsbury raised. We have been advised that we should focus on supporting an appeal by Shrewsbury and Congleton.
    [Show full text]
  • What the Crown May Do
    WHAT THE CROWN MAY DO 1. It is now established, at least at the level of the Court of Appeal (so that Court has recently stated)1, that, absent some prohibition, a Government minister may do anything which any individual may do. The purpose of this paper is to explain why this rule is misconceived and why it, and the conception of the “prerogative” which it necessarily assumes, should be rejected as a matter of constitutional law. 2. The suggested rule raises two substantive issues of constitutional law: (i) who ought to decide in what new activities the executive may engage, in what circumstances and under what conditions; and (ii) what is the scope for abuse that such a rule may create and should it be left without legal control. 3. As Sir William Wade once pointed out (in a passage subsequently approved by the Appellate Committee2), “The powers of public authorities are...essentially different from those of private persons. A man making his will may, subject to any rights of his dependants, dispose of his property just as he may wish. He may act out of malice or a spirit of revenge, but in law this does not affect his exercise of power. In the same way a private person has an absolute power to release a debtor, or, where the law permits, to evict a tenant, regardless of his motives. This is unfettered discretion.” If a minister may do anything that an individual may do, he may pursue any purpose which an individual may do when engaged in such activities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Congleton Accounts: Further Evidence of Elizabethan and Jacobean Drama in Cheshire
    ALAN C . COMAN The Congleton accounts: further evidence of Elizabethan and Jacobean drama in Cheshire Last summer, while conducting my research into the influence on Elizabethan and Jacobean drama of schoolmasters and household tutors in the northwest of England - viz, Cheshire, Lancashire, Shropshire (Salop) and Westmorland (Cumbria) - I came across some evidence of dramatic activities in Congleton that I believe are as yet undocumented but are significant in several respects . Since it was a chance discovery right at the end of my stay, what is presented here is only a cursory examination of the records, not a thorough and complete study . In the Cheshire County Record Office, I had occasion to consult Robert Head's Congleton Past and Present, published in 1887 and republished presumably as a centenary tribute in 1987, and History of Congleton, edited by W .B. Stephens and published in 1970 to celebrate the 700th anniversary of the town's royal charter.' Although my immediate concern was with the history of Congleton Grammar School and any possible dramatic activity connected with it, I was struck by references to the town's notorious week-long cockfights and bearbaits, and the even more intriguing assertions that the cockpit was usually in the school and that the schoolmaster was the controller and director of the pastime, reclaiming all runaway cocks as his own rightful perquisites . Head's book gave an entry from the borough's accounts : `1601. Payd John Wagge for dressyige the schoolhouse at the great cock fyghte . ..0.0.4d'. Because the aforementioned sports and pastimes were said to have drawn all the local gentry and nobility to the schoolhouse, the schoolmaster might also have undertaken some dramatic activities ; the town could have attracted touring companies at such times .
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Census Report for Parliamentary Constituencies
    Reference maps Page England and Wales North East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 42 North West: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 43 Yorkshire & The Humber: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 44 East Midlands: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 45 West Midlands: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 46 East of England: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 47 London: County & Parliamentary Constituencies 48 South East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 49 South West: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 50 Wales: Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 51 Scotland Scotland: Scottish Parliamentary Regions 52 Central Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 53 Glasgow Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 54 Highlands and Islands Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 55 Lothians Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 56 Mid Scotland and Fife Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 57 North East Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 58 South of Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 59 West of Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 60 Northern Ireland Northern Ireland: Parliamentary Constituencies 61 41 Reference maps Census 2001: Report for Parliamentary Constituencies North East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies Key government office region parliamentary constituencies counties
    [Show full text]
  • East Ward Data Provided by Cheshire East Council
    Congleton Town Council Business Plan 2019-2020 CONTENTS 1. Background Page 3 2. Congleton Town Profile Page 4 3. Map - of East and West Ward Page 6 4. Vision Page 7 5. Our Core Values Page 7 6. Strategic Objectives & Goals Page 8 7. Key Issues Page 8 8. Committee Structures Page 9 9. Working Groups Page 10 10. Financial Information Page 10 11. Strategic Goals Page 11 12. Summary Page 12 11. Glossary Page 13 2 BACKGROUND Congleton received its first charter in 1272, with civic government developing gradually until the ancient Borough was dissolved under the Municipal Corporations Act 1835. The reformed Congleton Urban District Council was a non-county borough, responsible for a range of local government functions within the geographical area of Congleton Town. It served as a principal authority within a two tier local government system, sharing duties with Cheshire County Council. This system continued until March 1974, when its powers transferred to the new District (Borough) of Congleton, formed in April 1974 by the merger of 5 former urban and rural authorities including Congleton BC. Both Congleton Borough Council and Cheshire County Council ceased to exist from 1st April 2009, be- ing replaced by the new Cheshire East Borough Council which serves as a unitary principal authority. Congleton Town Council is one of the largest of 108 town and parish councils within Cheshire East. It was inaugurated in 1980 to provide the local council tier of local government for the town of Congleton. It became fully operational in April 1981 and exists to serve as a vehicle of local opinion and to provide an effective link between the local residents/council tax payers and Cheshire East Council, to express local feelings and interests and to comment on all developments within the Town.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Land Classification Congleton Borough Local Plan Site 29 Heath End Road
    AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION CONGLETON BOROUGH LOCAL PLAN SITE 29 HEATH END ROAD R D Metcalfe ADAS Ref: 25/RPT/0568 Resource Planning Team Job No: 130/95 ADAS Statutory Group MAFF Ref: EL 06/00051 WOLVERHAMPTON mK«ng'lUi6^ AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION REPORT FOR CONGLETON BOROUGH LOCAL PLAN SITE 29 HEATH END ROAD 1 SUMMARY 1.1 The Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Survey for this site shows that the following proportions of ALC grades are present: Grade/Subgrade ha % of site 2 2.7 38 3b 3.2 44 Other land 1.3 18 1.2 The main Umitation to the agricultural use of land in Grade 2 and Subgrade 3a is soil droughtiness. 1.3 The main limitation to the agricultural use of land in Subgrade 3b is gradient. 2 INTRODUCTION 2.1 The site was surveyed by the Resource Plarming Team in Febmary 1996. An Agricultural Land Classification survey was undertaken according to the guidelines laid down in the "Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales - Revised Guidelines and Criteria for Grading the QuaHty of Agricultural Land" (MAFF 1988). 2.2 The 7.2 ha site is situated to the north of Alsager and west of the B5078. The land immediately to the north, east and west of the site is predominantly in agricultural use. The land immediately to the south of the site is in urban use. 2.3 The survey was requested by MAFF in connection with the Congleton Borough Local Plan. 2.4 At MAFF Land Use Planning Unit's request this was a detailed grid survey at 1:10000 with a minimum auger boring density of 1 per hectare.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationally Described Space Standards Justification Paper
    Cheshire East Local Plan Site Allocations and Development Policies Document Nationally Described Space Standards Justification Paper 1. Introduction 1.1 The National Planning Policy Framework asks local authorities to consider the mix of housing required to meet local need, including an assessment of the number of homes required of different sizes, types and tenures (¶61). 1.2 Following a ministerial statement issued in March 2015, an approach for the setting of technical housing standards in England was introduced that allowed local planning authorities to apply additional access and water efficiency standards through local plan policies, alongside an optional nationally described internal space standard. 1.3 The council has considered its approach to the introduction of optional technical housing standards for inclusion in the Site Allocations and Development Policies document (“SADPD”) as follows: the Residential Mix Study (2019) [ED 49] considers technical standards for accessibility and wheelchair housing standards; for water efficiency, the council is not intending to implement the tighter optional requirement for water efficiency standards of 110 litres/person/day in the SADPD. The borough does not fall in an area of ‘serious’ water company stress classification. 1.4 The purpose of this paper is to examine whether it is necessary for the optional Nationally Described Space Standard (“NDSS”) to be applied in the borough. Standards for internal space are set out in within the ‘Technical Housing Standards – nationally described space standard’ document (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government March 2015, as amended in May 2016). The NDSS sets out minimum requirements for: gross internal area (“GIA”) for each dwelling type (based on a combination of bedspaces and number of storeys); floor space and bedroom type; widths of each bedroom type; floor to ceiling height; and storage.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Parish Community Magazine June 2016
    Paul Parish Community Magazine June 2016 50p St Mary with St Paul, Penzance; St John the Baptist, Penzance St Peter’s, Newlyn; St Pol de Leon, Paul. Activities Contents Choir Practice Wed 7.30pm John Harry (church) Heritage Lottery Funding announcement Page 4 Bell Ringing Thurs 7.30pm Margaret Byrne (church) 731617 Deanery church visits Page 6 Womens Institute 2nd Thurs 7.30pm Linda Burton (church hall) 732618 Mousehole Methodist Chapel Services Page 7 Lunch Club Mon 12 for 12.30 Diane Bond Queen's 90th Birthday celeBrations Page 8 (church hall) 731057 Line Dancing Thurs 7.30-9.30pm Annaliese Male Dates for your diary Page 9 (church hall) (except 2nd Thurs) 731717 Paul Church services Page 10 Mousehole Male Voice Choir Page 11 Contacts ewaves Shout Page 12 Priest in charge Andrew Yates 367863 Cluster Christian Aid Supper Page 14 [email protected] Churchwardens Mary Wooding 732954 Women's Institute Page 15 Nancy Renfree 731608 Paul Greek Taverna funds for Refugees on Samos Page 16/17 Treasurer Pam Jones 731617 PCC Secretary Sue Snell 363386 Battle of the Somme - 100 years on Page 22/23/24 Pastoral Ministers Judith Byrne 367953 David Carpenter 731861 Mary Griffiths 732567 Nancy Renfree 731608 Church Hall hire Margaret Byrne 731617 Methodist Minister Rev. Julyan Drew 364707 NEXT MONTH'S EDITION Methodist Church Marjorie Kells 448622 secretary All contriButions for the July magazine to me By the 17th of June please. Magazine editor/ Kate Picknett 731991 I am urgently looking for anyone who would Be interested in taking over adverts [email protected] editing the magazine so please contact me if you think you can help.
    [Show full text]
  • The War Graves of the British Empire
    Shropshire i 148 THE WAR GRAVES OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE CEMETERIES AND CHURCHYARDS IN SHROPSHIRE THE WAR GRAVES, OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE The Register of the names of those who fell in the Great War and are buried in Cemeteries and Churchyards in the Administrative County of Shropshire Compiled and Published by order of the Imperial War Graves Commission, London. 1931* The particulars given in the Registers of the graves have been compiled from information furnished by the Record Offices and the next-of-kin. In all cases the relatives have been asked to furnish the personal information they wish to appear in the Register and where possible this has been given in their actual words. The manner of locating the graves recorded in these Registers docs not conform to any uniform system, but follows the practice adopted by the governing authorities of the various cemeteries concerned. They are indicated by letters or numbers at the end of the individual name entries, which represents the Plot (or Section, Ward or Compartment as the case may be), Row (if any) and Grave. In many instances three-sub-divisions of the Cemetery arc indicated, e.g., 51. 2. H. ; in some only two are shewn, the first of which represents the Plot or Row, whichever it might be, and the second the number of the Grave, e.g., C. 33.; in others only the Grave number is shewn, or only the Row is indicated. In many cases only a general indication of position can be given. The abbreviations used in the Registers in connection with the grave locations are appended as a glossary :— C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Oswestry Draft Report
    Oswestry Employment Sites Assessment Oswestry Borough Council CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 3 2.0 EMPLOYMENT LAND NEED ......................................................... 4 3.0 EXISTING EMPLOYMENT LAND SUPPLY ................................... 9 4.0 EMPLOYMENT LAND SUPPLY – POTENTIAL NEW SITES ...... 12 5.0 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................... 18 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................. 21 Appendix 1 – Consultees Appendix 2 – Site Plans O10(e)/Draft Report v2/October 2008/BE Group /01925 822112 Oswestry Employment Sites Assessment Oswestry Borough Council EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i. This report for Oswestry Borough Council reviews the supply and demand for employment land in the town and Borough of Oswestry to 2026. It assesses how much employment land is needed; considers whether the existing employment land meets this need; and then reviews the possible options to bring forward new and alternative development sites. Given that there is both limited budget and timescale for this study it relies on desk-top research, review of existing study data and reports, and consultation with key stakeholders. ii. According to emerging RSS guidance the Borough should have 28.8 ha of employment land for the period 2008 to 2026. Taking into account that some sites are not viable; together with the fact that some land is going to be developed for alternative uses, there is actually only 13.8 ha of employment land available in the Borough. There are also two atypically large, immediate company relocation requirements for which there are currently no suitable sites, they require 9.5-12.8 ha of freehold land. iii. The Borough therefore needs 38.3-41.6 ha gross of employment land. Given that there is 13.8 ha currently available, an additional 24.5-27.8 ha net is required for the period 2008 to 2026.
    [Show full text]
  • Shropshire Council Notice of Making of Control of Dogs
    SHROPSHIRE COUNCIL NOTICE OF MAKING OF CONTROL OF DOGS ORDERS THE CLEAN NEIGHBOURHOODS AND ENVIRONMENT ACT 2005 THE DOG CONTROL ORDERS (PRESCRIBED OFFENCES AND PENALTIES, etc.) REGULATIONS 2006 NOTICE is hereby given that Shropshire Council has made Orders pursuant to powers under the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005. The orders come into force on 1st November 2013. 1. The Fouling of Land by Dogs (Shropshire Council) Order 2013 will require persons in control of dogs to: Immediately remove faeces deposited by their dog and applies to all land in the Shropshire Council area which is open to the air (which includes land that is covered but open to the air on at least one side) and to which the public are entitled or permitted to have access with or without payment and includes: i. Any highway, footways, footpaths and towpaths within the area of Shropshire Council over which the public have a right of way on foot, together with any adjoining verges which are maintained at public expense. This may include some areas of access land. ii. All pedestrianised areas within the area of Shropshire Council to which the public have a right of access. iii. All open spaces which are owned, occupied or maintained by or on behalf of Shropshire Council, a Registered Social Landlord/Housing Association or any Town or Parish Councils, and any public open space held by any Body on behalf of a community within Shropshire Council. iv. Any cemetery, burial ground or churchyard. The exceptions to which the provisions of the order will NOT apply are: Forestry Commission land, or Land designated by the secretary of state as land which is not subject to the Order 2.
    [Show full text]