DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparative Study on Blowfish & Twofish Algorithms in Iot Applications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparative Study on Blowfish & Twofish Algorithms in Iot Applications Ms.S.Selvakumari Journal of Engineering Research and Application www.ijera.com ISSN: 2248-9622 Vol. 10, Issue 02 (Series -III) February 2020, pp 64-69 RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Comparative Study on Blowfish & Twofish Algorithms in Iot Applications Ms.S.Selvakumari, M.Sc., M.Phil., Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan College of Arts and Science for Women(Autonomous), Perambalur – 621212, Tamilnadu. ABSTRACT—Security is that the major concern within the epoch all told areas of applications. Cryptographic claims are becoming gradually more essential in today’s domain of data argument; big dimensions of data requirement to be moved safely from one position to add at high rapidity. The parallel implementation of blowfish cryptography rule and twofish crypto logic rule was compared in terms of period, speed up and parallel potency. IoT applications are wide employed in many fields of social living like health care and social product, industrial automation and energy. During this state of affairs, there square measure over fourteen billion interconnected digital and electronic devices operating worldwide, the equivalent of virtually 2 devices for each person on earth. The IoT connects totally different inanimate objects through the web and allows them to share info with their community network to alter processes for people in general and makes the web could be a worldwide system of interconnected pc networks that use the quality net protocol suite (TCP/IP) to serve billions of users globally. The foremost important characteristics of IoT embrace property, active engagement, property, sensors, AI, and little device use. This paper provides an summary of existing Internet of Things (IoT), technical details, and applications during this new rising space we have a tendency evaluating the level around the IoT. Keywords: Blowfish, Twofish, Internet of Things (IoT), Cryptography --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of Submission: 25-02-2020 Date Of Acceptance: 05-03-2020 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. INTRODUCTION should be distributed before start sending between Nowadays many systems need huge entities [6][9] The Symmetric key cryptography complex computations in many fields such as algorithms include Blowfish, AES, RC2, DES, industry, and all of these computations use parallel 3DES, and RC5. In Asymmetric key encryption or computing in order to get more performance [1]. public key encryption, private key and public key Corresponding and dispersed computing systems are used, the Public key is used for encryption and split large difficulties into smaller sub-problems a private key is used for decryption [2]. and allocate each of them to altered processors in a classically distributed system successively II. CRYPTOGRAPHY concurrent with corresponding system [2] [3] [4] Cryptography word is initially from the [5] [6]. Transforming data through internet is Greek words κρυπτο, means hidden/Secret and serious. To protected data operation and γραφη means script. In olden times stages are back transportations, want to practice cryptographic to around 2000 B.C and it’s about the training of procedures. Some cryptography algorithms have secret writing methodically. Cryptography is planned like Twofish, AES, DES, 3DES, RC2 [7] unique of the ancient/olden approaches involved by [8] [9] [10]. Among these algorithms is Twofish ancient cultures for secret method of cryptography algorithm. Cryptosystems has two infrastructures. Mostly the Egyptians are types Symmetric Key Encryption (using same key recognized to have charity cryptography on the for encryption and decrypting) and Asymmetric graves of late kings and leaders. Julius Caesar Key Encryption (different keys are used for imagined a procedure called as CAESAR CIPHER encrypting and decrypting the information). The for transfer secret/confidential mails to his generals security of encryption increasing depends on the during wars. This was one of the noticeable secure key and strength of cryptographic algorithm. methods in the past level of Cryptography, which The encryption algorithms are usually divided into remained very relaxed and fast. This was realized two types: Symmetric key encryption (private) and by the replacement cipher method with alphabet Asymmetric key encryption (public), in Symmetric shifts of 3, which would for example shift an ―A‖ key encryption or secret key encryption, only one to ―D‖ or a ―B‖ to ―E‖.[5] In current era, key is used to encrypt and decrypt data, the key cryptography uses complex scientific approaches www.ijera.com DOI: 10.9790/9622-1002036469 64 | P a g e Ms.S.Selvakumari Journal of Engineering Research and Application www.ijera.com ISSN: 2248-9622 Vol. 10, Issue 02 (Series -III) February 2020, pp 64-69 and the algorithms that are designed for a part that talks the expansion of the key and apart cryptosystems based on computational that reports the encryption of the data. resistance/stability, which makes it difficult for opponent/challenger to break into the system. The Key Expansion encryption algorithms convert the data into The key Expansion of blowfish algorithm jumbled form by using the ―key‖ and the user only initiates with the P-array and S-boxes with the using the same key can do the decryption.[4] The consumption of many sub-keys, which involves following diagram explains the working principle pre-computation already data encryption or of cryptography/crypto-system in general: decryption. The Parray contains of eighteen 4 byte Figure 1: Cryptography sub-keys: P1, P2…P17, P18. Blowfish with sources up to 448 bits distance is changed into several sub- key arrays. There are 256 entries for both of the four 32-bit S-boxes: S1, 0, S1,1,....., S1,255 S2, 0, S2,1,....., S2,255 S3, 0, S3,1,....., S3,255 S4, 0, S4,1,....., S4,255 Further down the steps of how to produce the subkeys: • Prepare the P-array and four S-boxes with a fixed Terminologies used sequence, this string consist of hexadecimal digits Plaintext: The original data is known as plaintext of π. • The first component in P-array (P1) XORed with Cipher text: The Encryption data or reasonable the leading 32 bits of the key, and the second data is called cipher manuscript element in P-array (P2)XORed with the second 32 Encryption: The process of moving plaintext to bits of the key ,frequent this until all the ciphertext fundamentals in P-array are XORedthrough the key Decryption: The Process of Adapting Cipher text bits. to plaintext. • Encrypt all zero filament by blowfish procedure Block cipher: The data is in the method of by sub keys defined in step (1, 2). Blocks. • Change P1 and P2 with the output of step (3). Stream Cipher: The data is in the arrangement of • Expending the modified sub keys encode the streams. output of step (3). Key: In cryptography solutions are two types on • Alteration P3 and P4 with the yield of step (5). Conventional key or Symmetric key or reserved Encryption/Decryption Process key and Unequal key or free key. One of the first protected block ciphers not topic Symmetric key: Both edges of Sender and to any patents, hence it is easily available for receiver use the similar key. tradition by anyone, which has added to its Asymmetric key: Double keys, one is free key admiration in cryptographic software. and isolated key. An another procedure designed to substitute DES, Varieties of Cryptography in which this symmetric cipher breaches messages The Crypto-System is well-defined as any scheme, into blocks of 64 bits and encrypts them discretely. which includes cryptography. The safety of such structure majorly is contingent upon the under given factors: Type of algorithms charity Number of keys in the procedure Number of circles III. BLOWFISH ALGORITHM In 1993 Bruce Schneider, solitary of the world's prominent cryptologists, designed the Blowfish algorithm and made it available in the public domain, blowfish is a variable length key, blowfish is also a block cipher with a length of 64 bit , and has not been cracked yet, it can be used in hardware applications due to its compactness [3][5][7]. There are two portions for this algorithm; www.ijera.com DOI: 10.9790/9622-1002036469 65 | P a g e Ms.S.Selvakumari Journal of Engineering Research and Application www.ijera.com ISSN: 2248-9622 Vol. 10, Issue 02 (Series -III) February 2020, pp 64-69 Figure 2 illustrates the Blowfish algorithm Blowfish [3] [4]. The cipher is a 16- round Feistel system with a impartial F function complete up of four key- in need of 8-by-8-bit S-boxes, a fixed 4- by-4 extreme distance divisible matrix over GF(28), a pseudo Hadamardconvert, bitwise revolutions, and a sensibly calculated key schedule [5] [6]. Twofish container and explained with the diagram; 128-bit plain-text (divided into four parts of 32-bit each) is assumed for the input blanching where it is XOR-edthrough four keys then purpose g PHT which are clarified under the caption twofish purposes besides modules. Twofish can be executed in hardware in 14000 gates [10]. The scheme of both the curved function and the key plan documents a wide diversity of tradeoffs amid speed, software size, key setup time, gate count, and memorial. Twofish has remained widely crypt analyzed used; level the best dose is able to opportunity only five rounds of the procedure. The 3.1 Advantages
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impossible Differentials in Twofish
    Twofish Technical Report #5 Impossible differentials in Twofish Niels Ferguson∗ October 19, 1999 Abstract We show how an impossible-differential attack, first applied to DEAL by Knudsen, can be applied to Twofish. This attack breaks six rounds of the 256-bit key version using 2256 steps; it cannot be extended to seven or more Twofish rounds. Keywords: Twofish, cryptography, cryptanalysis, impossible differential, block cipher, AES. Current web site: http://www.counterpane.com/twofish.html 1 Introduction 2.1 Twofish as a pure Feistel cipher Twofish is one of the finalists for the AES [SKW+98, As mentioned in [SKW+98, section 7.9] and SKW+99]. In [Knu98a, Knu98b] Lars Knudsen used [SKW+99, section 7.9.3] we can rewrite Twofish to a 5-round impossible differential to attack DEAL. be a pure Feistel cipher. We will demonstrate how Eli Biham, Alex Biryukov, and Adi Shamir gave the this is done. The main idea is to save up all the ro- technique the name of `impossible differential', and tations until just before the output whitening, and applied it with great success to Skipjack [BBS99]. apply them there. We will use primes to denote the In this report we show how Knudsen's attack can values in our new representation. We start with the be applied to Twofish. We use the notation from round values: [SKW+98] and [SKW+99]; readers not familiar with R0 = ROL(Rr;0; (r + 1)=2 ) the notation should consult one of these references. r;0 b c R0 = ROR(Rr;1; (r + 1)=2 ) r;1 b c R0 = ROL(Rr;2; r=2 ) 2 The attack r;2 b c R0 = ROR(Rr;3; r=2 ) r;3 b c Knudsen's 5-round impossible differential works for To get the same output we update the rule to com- any Feistel cipher where the round function is in- pute the output whitening.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the AES Candidates
    Rep ort on the AES Candidates 1 2 1 3 Olivier Baudron , Henri Gilb ert , Louis Granb oulan , Helena Handschuh , 4 1 5 1 Antoine Joux , Phong Nguyen ,Fabrice Noilhan ,David Pointcheval , 1 1 1 1 Thomas Pornin , Guillaume Poupard , Jacques Stern , and Serge Vaudenay 1 Ecole Normale Sup erieure { CNRS 2 France Telecom 3 Gemplus { ENST 4 SCSSI 5 Universit e d'Orsay { LRI Contact e-mail: [email protected] Abstract This do cument rep orts the activities of the AES working group organized at the Ecole Normale Sup erieure. Several candidates are evaluated. In particular we outline some weaknesses in the designs of some candidates. We mainly discuss selection criteria b etween the can- didates, and make case-by-case comments. We nally recommend the selection of Mars, RC6, Serp ent, ... and DFC. As the rep ort is b eing nalized, we also added some new preliminary cryptanalysis on RC6 and Crypton in the App endix which are not considered in the main b o dy of the rep ort. Designing the encryption standard of the rst twentyyears of the twenty rst century is a challenging task: we need to predict p ossible future technologies, and wehavetotake unknown future attacks in account. Following the AES pro cess initiated by NIST, we organized an op en working group at the Ecole Normale Sup erieure. This group met two hours a week to review the AES candidates. The present do cument rep orts its results. Another task of this group was to up date the DFC candidate submitted by CNRS [16, 17] and to answer questions which had b een omitted in previous 1 rep orts on DFC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Road to the Advanced Encryption Standard
    The Long Road to the Advanced Encryption Standard Jean-Luc Cooke CertainKey Inc. [email protected], http://www.certainkey.com/˜jlcooke Abstract 1 Introduction This paper will start with a brief background of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) process, lessons learned from the Data Encryp- tion Standard (DES), other U.S. government Two decades ago the state-of-the-art in cryptographic publications and the fifteen first the private sector cryptography was—we round candidate algorithms. The focus of the know now—far behind the public sector. presentation will lie in presenting the general Don Coppersmith’s knowledge of the Data design of the five final candidate algorithms, Encryption Standard’s (DES) resilience to and the specifics of the AES and how it dif- the then unknown Differential Cryptanaly- fers from the Rijndael design. A presentation sis (DC), the design principles used in the on the AES modes of operation and Secure Secure Hash Algorithm (SHA) in Digital Hash Algorithm (SHA) family of algorithms Signature Standard (DSS) being case and will follow and will include discussion about point[NISTDSS][NISTDES][DC][NISTSHA1]. how it is directly implicated by AES develop- ments. The selection and design of the DES was shrouded in controversy and suspicion. This very controversy has lead to a fantastic acceler- Intended Audience ation in private sector cryptographic advance- ment. So intrigued by the NSA’s modifica- tions to the Lucifer algorithm, researchers— This paper was written as a supplement to a academic and industry alike—powerful tools presentation at the Ottawa International Linux in assessing block cipher strength were devel- Symposium.
    [Show full text]
  • Twofish Algorithm for Encryption and Decryption
    © 2019 JETIR January 2019, Volume 6, Issue 1 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) TWOFISH ALGORITHM FOR ENCRYPTION AND DECRYPTION *1 Anil G. Sawant,2 Dr. Vilas N. Nitnaware, 3Pranali Dengale, 4Sayali Garud, 5Akshay Gandewar *1 Research Scholar (Asst. Professor) ,2 Principal, 3Student, 4Student, 5Student *1 JJT University, Rajasthan, India (Trinity College of Engineering and Research, Pune), 2 D. Y. Patil School of Engineering Academy, Pune, India, 3Trinity College of Engineering and Research Pune, 4Trinity College of Engineering and Research, Pune5 Trinity College of Engineering and Research, Pune. Email:* [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract - In this paper, a novel VLSI architecture of the TWOFISH block cipher is presented. TWOFISH is one of the most secure cryptographic algorithm. The characteristic features of the TWOFISH Algorithm are good security margin and has fast encryption/decryption in software, moderately fast in hardware and moderate flexibility. Based on the loop-folding technique combined with efficient hardware mapping, the architecture of twofish Algorithm can make data encryption/ decryption more efficient and secure. To demonstrate the correctness of our Algorithm , a prototype chip for the architecture has been implemented. The chip can achieve an encryption rate and low power consumption while operating clock rate. Designed TWOFISH cryptographic algorithm improved the MDS block that improved a process speed, and decreased complexity and power consumption. Therefore, the chip can be applied to encryption in high-speed networking protocols like ATM networks. This paper will be implemented in Xilinx 14.2 in Verilog HDL. Keywords - Verilog , MDS, PHT, DES, Function F and h.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruce Schneier 2
    Committee on Energy and Commerce U.S. House of Representatives Witness Disclosure Requirement - "Truth in Testimony" Required by House Rule XI, Clause 2(g)(5) 1. Your Name: Bruce Schneier 2. Your Title: none 3. The Entity(ies) You are Representing: none 4. Are you testifying on behalf of the Federal, or a State or local Yes No government entity? X 5. Please list any Federal grants or contracts, or contracts or payments originating with a foreign government, that you or the entity(ies) you represent have received on or after January 1, 2015. Only grants, contracts, or payments related to the subject matter of the hearing must be listed. 6. Please attach your curriculum vitae to your completed disclosure form. Signatur Date: 31 October 2017 Bruce Schneier Background Bruce Schneier is an internationally renowned security technologist, called a security guru by the Economist. He is the author of 14 books—including the New York Times best-seller Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World—as well as hundreds of articles, essays, and academic papers. His influential newsletter Crypto-Gram and blog Schneier on Security are read by over 250,000 people. Schneier is a fellow at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University, a Lecturer in Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School, a board member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Tor Project, and an advisory board member of EPIC and VerifiedVoting.org. He is also a special advisor to IBM Security and the Chief Technology Officer of IBM Resilient.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Key-Dependent S-Boxes: the Case of Twofish
    Characteristics of Key-Dependent S-Boxes: the Case of Twofish Marco Macchetti Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy [email protected] Abstract. In this paper we analyze and discuss the cryptographic ro- bustness of key-dependent substitution boxes (KDSBs); these can be found in some symmetric-key algorithms such as Khufu, Blowfish, and the AES finalist Twofish. We analyze KDSBs in the framework of com- posite permutations, completing the theory developed by O’Connor. Un- der the basic assumption that KDSBs are built choosing permutations randomly from the symmetric group S2m by means of the key, the ex- pressions of their linear and differential characteristics are derived. These results are used as a statistical tool to show that Twofish KDSBs, al- though very efficient, can be easily distinguished from truly randomly built KDSBs. We also analyze the motivations that lead to this previ- ously unknown property; it can be concluded that the efficiency of the construction and the small computational complexity of Twofish KDSBs, although very desirable, cannot be easily obtained together with the highest level of security. Keywords: key-dependent s-boxes, linear cryptanalysis, differential crypt- analysis, composite permutations, Twofish. 1 Introduction Block ciphers are an important and widely studied class of cryptographic algo- rithms; the obsolete Data Encryption Standard (DES) [1] and the established Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) [2] are two well known examples. Practically all the proposed algorithms are constructed as Substitution Per- mutation Networks (SPNs) or Feistel structures; in both cases the importance of the non-linear part of the algorithm is crucial, especially considering the crypt- analytic techniques known as Differential [6] and Linear Cryptanalysis [8].
    [Show full text]
  • Miss in the Middle Attacks on IDEA and Khufu
    Miss in the Middle Attacks on IDEA and Khufu Eli Biham? Alex Biryukov?? Adi Shamir??? Abstract. In a recent paper we developed a new cryptanalytic techni- que based on impossible differentials, and used it to attack the Skipjack encryption algorithm reduced from 32 to 31 rounds. In this paper we describe the application of this technique to the block ciphers IDEA and Khufu. In both cases the new attacks cover more rounds than the best currently known attacks. This demonstrates the power of the new cryptanalytic technique, shows that it is applicable to a larger class of cryptosystems, and develops new technical tools for applying it in new situations. 1 Introduction In [5,17] a new cryptanalytic technique based on impossible differentials was proposed, and its application to Skipjack [28] and DEAL [17] was described. In this paper we apply this technique to the IDEA and Khufu cryptosystems. Our new attacks are much more efficient and cover more rounds than the best previously known attacks on these ciphers. The main idea behind these new attacks is a bit counter-intuitive. Unlike tra- ditional differential and linear cryptanalysis which predict and detect statistical events of highest possible probability, our new approach is to search for events that never happen. Such impossible events are then used to distinguish the ci- pher from a random permutation, or to perform key elimination (a candidate key is obviously wrong if it leads to an impossible event). The fact that impossible events can be useful in cryptanalysis is an old idea (for example, some of the attacks on Enigma were based on the observation that letters can not be encrypted to themselves).
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analysis of Advanced Encryption Standard, Blowfish and Rivest Cipher 4 Algorithms
    www.ijird.com November, 2014 Vol 3 Issue 11 ISSN 2278 – 0211 (Online) Comparative Analysis of Advanced Encryption Standard, Blowfish and Rivest Cipher 4 Algorithms Adolf Fenyi Researcher, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Knust, Ghana Joseph G. Davis Lecturer, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Knust, Ghana Dr. Kwabena Riverson Head of Programme CSIR Institute of Industrial Research Accra, Ghana Abstract: Cryptography is one of the main categories of computer security that converts information from its normal form into an unreadable form. The two main characteristics that identify and differentiate one encryption algorithm from another are its ability to secure the protected data against attacks and its speed and efficiency in doing so.Cryptography is required to transmit confidential information over the network. It is also demanding in wide range of applications which includes mobile and networking applications. Cryptographic algorithms play a vital role in providing the data security against malicious attacks. But on the other hand, they consume significant amount of computing resources like CPU time, memory, encryption time etc. Normally, symmetric key algorithms are preferred over asymmetric key algorithms as they are very fast in nature. Symmetric algorithms are classified as block cipher and stream ciphers algorithms. In this research project, I comparedthe AES and Blowfish algorithms with different modes of operation (ECB, CBC, and CFB) and RC4 algorithm (stream cipher) in terms encryption time, decryption time, memory utilization and throughput at different settings likevariable key size and variable data packet size.A stimulation program is developed using PHP and JavaScript scripting languages. The program encrypts and decrypts different file sizes ranging from 1MB to 50MB.
    [Show full text]
  • AES, Blowfish and Twofish for Security of Wireless Networks
    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 07 Issue: 06 | June 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Comparison of Encryption Algorithms: AES, Blowfish and Twofish for Security of Wireless Networks Archisman Ghosh Department of Computer Science & Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, West Bengal, India --------------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - Encryption is the process of encoding data to A secure WiFi system uses algorithms such as DES, RSA, prevent unauthorized access. Cyber security is the need of AES, Blowfish and Twofish to secure the communication the hour which ensures transfer of data across the internet over seemingly unsecured Internet channels. In addition, with confidentiality and integrity, and provides protection the existing cryptographic algorithm is based on an against malicious attacks. In this research paper, encryption model designed by Horst Feistel of IBM [4]. comparison between the encryption algorithms, viz. AES (Advanced Encryption Standard), Blowfish, and Twofish is In this paper, a comparative study of the cryptographic done in terms of time of encryption and decryption, and algorithms: AES, Blowfish and Twofish has been done and their throughput, and the results are analysed indicating the the results have been analysed in order to find the superiority of Twofish over AES and Blowfish as a viable algorithm most suitable for encrypting data in wireless algorithm for data encryption in wireless networks. networks. Keywords: Cryptography, Network security, AES, 2. Overview of the algorithms Blowfish, Twofish, Secure communication. 2.1 AES 1. Introduction The Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) is a Owing to the advancement in internet accessibility and cryptographic algorithm for encryption of electronic data networking, most of the security sensitive stuff like established by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Stream Cipher HC-256
    A New Stream Cipher HC-256 Hongjun Wu Institute for Infocomm Research 21 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119613 [email protected] Abstract. Stream cipher HC-256 is proposed in this paper. It generates keystream from a 256-bit secret key and a 256-bit initialization vector. HC-256 consists of two secret tables, each one with 1024 32-bit elements. The two tables are used as S-Box alternatively. At each step one element of a table is updated and one 32-bit output is generated. The encryption speed of the C implementation of HC-256 is about 1.9 bit per clock cycle (4.2 clock cycle per byte) on the Intel Pentium 4 processor. 1 Introduction Stream ciphers are used for shared-key encryption. The modern software efficient stream ciphers can run 4-to-5 times faster than block ciphers. However, very few efficient and secure stream ciphers have been published. Even the most widely used stream cipher RC4 [25] has several weaknesses [14, 16, 22, 9, 10, 17, 21]. In the recent NESSIE project all the six stream cipher submissions cannot meet the stringent security requirements [23]. In this paper we aim to design a very simple, secure, software-efficient and freely-available stream cipher. HC-256 is the stream cipher we proposed in this paper. It consists of two secret tables, each one with 1024 32-bit elements. At each step we update one element of a table with non-linear feedback function. Every 2048 steps all the elements of the two tables are updated.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Twofish Key Schedule
    On the Two sh Key Schedule ? ?? ??? y Bruce Schneier , John Kelsey , Doug Whiting ,David Wagner , Chris z x Hall , and Niels Ferguson Abstract. Two sh is a new blo ck cipher with a 128 bit blo ck, and a key length of 128, 192, or 256 bits, which has b een submitted as an AES candidate. In this pap er, we brie y review the structure of Two sh, and then discuss the key schedule of Two sh, and its resistance to attack. We close with some op en questions on the securityofTwo sh's key schedule. 1 Intro duction NIST announced the Advanced Encryption Standard AES program in 1997 [NIST97a]. NIST solicited comments from the public on the prop osed standard, and eventually issued a call for algorithms to satisfy the standard [NIST97b]. The intention is for NIST to make all submissions public and eventually, through a pro cess of public review and comment, cho ose a new encryption standard to replace DES. Two sh is our submission to the AES selection pro cess. It meets all the required NIST criteria|128-bit blo ck; 128-, 192-, and 256-bit key; ecienton various platforms; etc.|and some strenuous design requirements, p erformance as well as cryptographic, of our own. Two sh was designed to meet NIST's design criteria for AES [NIST97b]. Sp eci cally, they are: { A 128-bit symmetric blo ck cipher. { Key lengths of 128 bits, 192 bits, and 256 bits. { No weak keys. { Eciency, b oth on the Intel Pentium Pro and other software and hardware platforms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Twofish Team's Final Comments on AES Selection
    The Twofish Team’s Final Comments on AES Selection Bruce Schneier∗ John Kelseyy Doug Whitingz David Wagnerx Chris Hall{ Niels Fergusonk Tadayoshi Kohno∗∗ Mike Stayyy May 15, 2000 1 Introduction In 1996, the National Institute of Standards and Technology initiated a program to choose an Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) to replace DES [NIST97a]. In 1997, after soliciting public comment on the process, NIST requested pro- posed encryption algorithms from the cryptographic community [NIST97b]. Fif- teen algorithms were submitted to NIST in 1998. NIST held two AES Candidate Conferences—the first in California in 1998 [NIST98], and the second in Rome in 1999 [NIST99a]—and then chose five finalist candidates [NIST99b]: MARS [BCD+98], RC6 [RRS+98], Rijndael [DR98], Serpent [ABK98], and Twofish [SKW+98a]. NIST held the Third AES Candidate Conference in New York in April 2000 [NIST00], and is about to choose a single algorithm to become AES. We, the authors of the Twofish algorithm and members of the extended Twofish team, would like to express our continued support for Twofish. Since first proposing the algorithm in 1998 [SKW+98a, SKW+99c], we have con- tinued to perform extensive analysis of the cipher, with respect to both secu- ∗Counterpane Internet Security, Inc., 3031 Tisch Way, 100 Plaza East, San Jose, CA 95128, USA; [email protected]. yCounterpane Internet Security, Inc. [email protected]. zHi/fn, Inc., 5973 Avenida Encinas Suite 110, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA; dwhiting@hifn. com. xUniversity of California Berkeley, Soda Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; [email protected]. edu. {Princeton University, Fine Hall, Washington Road, Princeton, NJ 08544; cjh@princeton.
    [Show full text]