DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrating Legal Protections for Sharks and Rays Into Western And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrating Legal Protections for Sharks and Rays Into Western And MARCH 2021 Integrating Legal Protections for Sharks and Rays into Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission Regulation ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was prepared by the Environmental Law Institute (ELI). The primary drafter was Greta Swanson, with input received from Xiao Recio-Blanco. The drafters wish to express gratitude to members of the Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency, Glenn Sant, and Colin Simpfendorfer. Funding was generously provided by the Shark Conservation Foundation. The contents of this report, including any errors or omissions, are solely the responsibility of ELI. The authors invite corrections and additions. ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW INSTITUTE & THE ELI OCEAN PROGRAM The Environmental Law Institute makes law work for people, places, and the planet. Since 1969, ELI has played a pivotal role in shaping the fields of environmental law, policy, and management, domestically and abroad. Today, in our sixth decade, we are an internationally recognized, non-partisan publishing, research, and education center working to strengthen environmental protection by improving law and governance worldwide. To address threats to the marine environment, the ELI Ocean Program focuses on strengthening ocean and coastal law and policy domestically and internationally. We support ocean management systems that are based on local priorities, inclusive and effective processes, and best available information. Integrating Legal Protections for Sharks and Rays in the WCPFC. © 2021 Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, D.C. All rights reserved. A PDF file of this report may be obtained for no cost from the Environmental Law Institute website at www.eli.org. Please contact Xiao Recio-Blanco ([email protected]) for more information. Cover Image: Jacob Owens on Unsplash 2 Contents INTRODUCTION TO THE REPORT ....................................................................................................................... 5 SECTION 1: PROTECTIONS AND LISTINGS FOR SHARKS AND RAYS WITHIN THE WESTERN AND CENTRAL PACIFIC FISHERIES CONVENTION AREA ........................................................................................ 6 Overview of Treaty Commitments ......................................................................................................................... 6 Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Convention and Conservation Management Measures .............................. 9 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS), and Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation of Migratory Sharks (Sharks MOU) .............................................................................................................................................................. 10 CITES ........................................................................................................................................................................ 11 CMS ......................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Species Regulated ....................................................................................................................................................... 14 Overview of Conservation Status and Regulatory Measures for Shark Species ....................................................... 18 Oceanic Whitetip Shark (Carcharhinus longimanus) ............................................................................................... 19 Silky Shark (Carcharhinus falciformes ..................................................................................................................... 19 Thresher Shark (Alopias superciliosus – Bigeye; Alopias vulpinus – Common; Alopias pelagicus – Pelagic) .......... 20 Hammerhead Shark (Sphyrna lewini ‒ Scalloped; Sphyrna mokarran – Great; Sphyrna zygaena ‒ Smooth) ........ 20 Whale Shark (Rhincodon typus) .............................................................................................................................. 21 Basking Shark (Cetorhinus maximus) ...................................................................................................................... 21 White Shark (Charcharodon carcharias) ................................................................................................................. 21 Dusky Shark (Carcharhinus obscurus) ..................................................................................................................... 22 Mako Shark (Isurus oxyrinchus – Shortfin; Isurus paucus – Longfin) ....................................................................... 22 Porbeagle Shark (Lamna masus) ............................................................................................................................. 22 Blue Shark (Prionace glauca) ................................................................................................................................... 23 Manta Rays (Manta alfredi, Manta birostris) .......................................................................................................... 23 Mobula Rays (Mobula birostris, Mobula eregoodootenkee, Mobula hypostoma, Mobula japanica, Mobula kuhlii, Mobula mobular, Mobula munkiana, Mobula rochebrunei, Mobula tarapacana, Mobula thurstoni) ................... 23 SECTION 2. CITES LEGAL ACQUISITION FINDING AND NON-DETRIMENT FINDING ........................ 24 Legality Determination (Legal Acquisition Finding) ................................................................................................... 24 Parties’ Actions to Ensure Compliance With RFMO Regulations ............................................................................ 25 Traceability of Catch ................................................................................................................................................ 29 Other Measures to Check for Legality ..................................................................................................................... 33 Non-Detriment Findings ............................................................................................................................................. 38 CITES Requirements ................................................................................................................................................ 38 Potential Role of the WCPFC in Making Regional NDFs .......................................................................................... 39 3 SECTION 3: GAPS AND SYNERGIES BETWEEN THE CMS AND WCPFC REGULATION ....................... 43 Prohibition on Taking of Species in CMS Appendix I ................................................................................................. 47 Recommendation .................................................................................................................................................... 49 Requirement That Fishing Mortality Does Not Result in Significant Population Decline ......................................... 49 Recommendation .................................................................................................................................................... 49 Setting Targets for Fishing Quotas or Effort for Sharks ............................................................................................. 50 Recommendation .................................................................................................................................................... 50 Use of Selective Gear, Techniques, and Incidental Capture Mechanisms to Ensure Sustainable Take of Sharks ...................................................................................................................................................................... 50 Recommendation .................................................................................................................................................... 51 Landing With Fins-Attached Rules .............................................................................................................................. 52 Recommendation .................................................................................................................................................... 53 Area-Based Regulation ............................................................................................................................................... 53 Actions Under the MOU and Concerted Action for Mobulid Rays .......................................................................... 54 Recommendation .................................................................................................................................................... 57 NEXT STEPS .............................................................................................................................................................. 57 4 Introduction to the Report Sharks play an essential role in the marine ecosystem. As predators, they help to maintain balance in the food chain, eliminate sick and weak animals, and ensure species diversity; and may play a role in protecting coral reefs.1 Numerous species of migratory sharks traverse the area of the Western and Central Pacific Ocean, migrating across national boundaries and into the high seas, areas beyond national jurisdiction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Microbial Community Richness Distinguishes Shark Species Microbiomes in South Florida Rachael Cassandra Karns Nova Southeastern University, [email protected]
    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks HCNSO Student Theses and Dissertations HCNSO Student Work 7-28-2017 Microbial Community Richness Distinguishes Shark Species Microbiomes in South Florida Rachael Cassandra Karns Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_stuetd Part of the Bioinformatics Commons, Environmental Microbiology and Microbial Ecology Commons, Marine Biology Commons, Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons, and the Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Share Feedback About This Item NSUWorks Citation Rachael Cassandra Karns. 2017. Microbial Community Richness Distinguishes Shark Species Microbiomes in South Florida. Master's thesis. Nova Southeastern University. Retrieved from NSUWorks, . (453) https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_stuetd/453. This Thesis is brought to you by the HCNSO Student Work at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in HCNSO Student Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HALMOS COLLEGE OF NATURAL SCIENCES AND OCEANOGRAPHY Microbial Community Richness Distinguishes Shark Species Microbiomes in South Florida By Rachael Cassandra Karns Submitted to the Faculty of Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science with a specialty in: Marine Biology Nova Southeastern University 08/01/2017 1 Thesis of Rachael Cassandra Karns Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Science: Marine Biology Nova Southeastern University Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography August 2017 Approved: Thesis Committee Major Professor: ______________________________ Jose Lopez, Ph.D. Committee Member: ___________________________ Cole Easson, Ph.D. Committee Member: ___________________________ Mahmood Shivji, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing, Finning and Tourism: Trends in Pacific Shark Conservation and Management
    J MARINE MARTINUS AND COASTAL The International Journal of LAW PUBLISHERS Marine and Coastal Law 27 (2012) 597-621 brill.nl/cstu Fishing, Finning and Tourism: Trends in Pacific Shark Conservation and Management Erika J.Techera Faculty of Law, The University of Western Australia, Cravirley WA, Australia Absttact Sharks have a key position in the ocean food chain and their removal could have far-reaching implications beyond the species themselves. Yet since the 1980s the harvesting of sharks, pri- marily for their fins, and their extraction as bycatch have resulted in a rapid decline in num- bers. It is against this backdrop that the Pacific is leading the way in legal developments for shark conservation: from the US shark conservation law, and finning bans in Hawai'i, the Gommonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and Guam, to the declaration of Palau's shark sanctuary. These national initiatives have been complemented by regional action, includ- ing the adoption of a Regional Plan of Action for sharks by the Pacific nations. This article examines the legal developments and the emerging leadership role the region is taking. The lessons that they offer are explored, as well as some of the remaining challenges. Keywords environmental law; fisheries; Pacific islands; sharks; tourism; marine sanctuaries Introduction The Pacific tegion is one of the most significant fisheries in the world, conttib- uting around 54% of global marine catches.' The Westetn and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) area, fot example, provides mote than 50% of world tuna catch.^ Harvests have steadily increased in this region: 2007 produced the highest annual catch recorded to date,^ and the majotity of gtowth is in the offshore sector."* Many of the Pacific nations detive significant ' The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) reports that in 2008, the Northwest Pacific, Southeast Pacific and Central Western Pacific fisheries contributed 25%, 15% and 14%, respectively: FAO, State of the Worlds Eisheries and Aquaculture 2010 (FAO, Rome 2010), 35.
    [Show full text]
  • NON DETRIMENT FINDINGS for SILKY SHARK Carcharhinus Falciformis
    NON DETRIMENT FINDINGS for SILKY SHARK Carcharhinus falciformis Penerbitan dokumen NDF ini dimungkinkan dengan dukungan Rakyat Amerika melalui Badan Pembangunan Internasional Amerika Serikat (USAID) dan Bank Dunia melalui Program Coremap – Coral Triangle Initiative (CTI). Isi dari dokumen ini adalah tanggung jawab Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI) dan tidak mencerminkan pandangan USAID atau Pemerintah Amerika Serikat. CHAPTER-1 INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background Shark and ray (Elasmobranch) fishery is one of the most important fisheries in the world. FAO data reported that the total catch of Elasmobranchs in the world in 1994 reached 731 thousand tons of which Asian countries contributed around 60%. Furthermore, four Asian countries i.e. Indonesia, India, Japan and Pakistan contributed around 75% of the total catch of sharks and rays in Asia in 2002 (Bonfil 2002). Indonesia is known as the country with the largest shark and ray fishery production in the world, with the total number of the catch over 100,000 tons per year, or about 13% of the total global catch. Since the last two decades, Indonesian total production of shark and ray (Elasmobranch) fisheries has shown a significant increasing trend. The main product of shark and ray fisheries in Indonesia is the shark fins. The high price of shark fins in the international market has triggered the increase of shark fishing activities. Present population status of some high value species of sharks in many countries including Indonesia has indicated the decreasing trend. This condition is believed to threat the sustainability of natural stocks especially when the regulation on controlling the catch is still lacking (Daley et al., 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • First Evidence of Multiple Paternity in the Bull Shark (Carcharhinus Leucas) Agathe Pirog, Sébastien Jaquemet, Marc Soria, Hélène Magalon
    First evidence of multiple paternity in the bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas) Agathe Pirog, Sébastien Jaquemet, Marc Soria, Hélène Magalon To cite this version: Agathe Pirog, Sébastien Jaquemet, Marc Soria, Hélène Magalon. First evidence of multiple paternity in the bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas). Marine and Freshwater Research, CSIRO Publishing, 2015, 10.1071/mf15255. hal-01253775 HAL Id: hal-01253775 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01253775 Submitted on 4 May 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. First evidence of multiple paternity in the bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas) Agathe PirogA, Se´bastien JaquemetA,B, Marc SoriaC and He´le`ne MagalonA,B,D AUniversite´ de La Re´union, UMR 9220 ENTROPIE (Universite´ de La Re´union/IRD/CNRS), 15 Avenue Rene´ Cassin, CS 92003, F-97744 Saint Denis Cedex 09, La Re´union, France. BLaboratory of Excellence CORAIL, 58, Avenue Paul Alduy, F-66860 Perpignan Cedex, France. CIRD Re´union, UMR 248 MARBEC, CS 41095 2 rue Joseph Wetzell, F-97492 Sainte-Clotilde, La Re´union, France. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. The present study assessed the occurrence of multiple paternity in four litters of bull shark Carcharhinus leucas (n ¼ 5, 8, 9 and 11 embryos) sampled at Reunion Island in the Western Indian Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • A Practical Guide to Effective Design and Management of Mpas For
    A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO THE REPORT EFFECTIVE DESIGN AND 2019 MANAGEMENT OF MPAs FOR SHARKS AND RAYS This project has been a collaboration between the Centre LEAD AUTHOR: for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture Cassandra L Rigby, James Cook (CSTFA) at James Cook University, Australia, and WWF. University ABOUT WWF AUTHORS: WWF is one of the largest and most experienced Colin Simpendorfer, James Cook independent conservation organizations, with over University 5 million supporters and a global network active in Andy Cornish, WWF-Hong Kong more than 100 countries. WWF´s mission is to stop the degradation of the planet´s natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with HOW TO CITE THIS WORK: nature, by conserving the world´s biological diversity, Rigby, C.L., Simpfendorfer, C.A. ensuring that the use of renewable resources is and A. Cornish (2019) A Practical sustainable, and promoting the reduction of pollution Guide to Effective Design and and wasteful consumption. WWF works to reverse Management of MPAs for Sharks declining shark populations through Sharks: Restoring and Rays. WWF, Gland, Switzerland. the Balance, a global initiative. www.panda.org DESIGN AND PRODUCTION: sharks.panda.org Evan Jeffries, Catherine Perry – Swim2Birds Ltd ABOUT CSTFA www.swim2birds.co.uk Research within the Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture (CSTFA) focuses not only Published in May 2019 by WWF on the aquatic and aquaculture systems that produce – World Wide Fund for Nature, food, but also the industries and communities that Gland, Switzerland utilise them. Multidisciplinary collaborations between our researchers provide the synergies to address Any reproduction in full or part substantial research problems in a way that individual must mention the title and credit research groups cannot.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Shark Conservation Sanctuaries for a Predator in Peril
    GLOBAL SHARK CONSERVATION SANCTUARIES FOR A PREDATOR IN PERIL The Pew Charitable Trusts is driven by the power of knowledge to solve today’s most challenging problems. Pew applies a rigorous, analytical approach to improve public policy, inform the public, and stimulate civic life. www.PewTrusts.org THE OPPORTUNITY Swift, graceful, mysterious, superbly adapted of animals on Earth. Ironically, however, sharks. Recognizing this opportunity, The to their environment, sharks have been the even though people are the principal threat Pew Charitable Trusts initiated a campaign apex predators of the oceans since long to sharks, they also are their greatest hope. to reverse the decline of shark populations before dinosaurs roamed the planet. For worldwide. some 400 million years, they have been The fate of sharks has broad implications. the unchallenged rulers of the deeps and There is increasing evidence that the loss At the core of Pew’s shark conservation shallows of the marine world. of sharks may have a ripple effect on the efforts is its work to establish sanctuaries in vitality of food webs in many areas of the the waters of key countries and stop the No longer. They are falling victim to a fiercer global ocean. “They are our canary in the coal overfishing of sharks in places where predator that is threatening to end their mine of the oceans,” said Dr. Boris Worm, a they still stand a chance to rebound. Shark long reign and driving them to the edge of professor of marine biology at Dalhousie sanctuaries provide full protections for sharks extinction. That predator is us—people.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPPLEMENTARY ONLINE MATERIAL for New Specimen of the Rare Requiem Shark Eogaleus Bolcensis from the Bolca Lagerstätte, Italy G
    http://app.pan.pl/SOM/app65-LaroccaConte_etal_SOM.pdf SUPPLEMENTARY ONLINE MATERIAL FOR New specimen of the rare requiem shark Eogaleus bolcensis from the Bolca Lagerstätte, Italy Gabriele Larocca Conte, Enrico Trevisani, Paolo Guaschi, and Federico Fanti Published in Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 2020 65 (3): 547-560. https://doi.org/10.4202/app.00725.2020 Supplementary Online Material SOM 1. Table 1. Measurements of Galeorhinus cuvieri and Eogaleus bolcensis. Table 2. Age estimates of Bolca specimens according to growth parameters of different extant populations of carcharhiniforms. SOM 2. Measurements of preserved teeth of MSNPV 24625 available at http://app.pan.pl/SOM/app65-LaroccaConte_etal_SOM/SOM_2.xlsx SOM 3. Counts and antero-posterior length of centra of Bolca carcharhiniforms assemblage available at http://app.pan.pl/SOM/app65-LaroccaConte_etal_SOM/SOM_3.xlsx References SOM 1. Table 1. Measurements (in mm) of Galeorhinus cuvieri and Eogaleus bolcensis. %TL = (X/TL) * 100; where %TL, percentage of the total length; X, length of the body segment. ID, morphometric measurement (see Fig. 1A for explanations). “+x” refers to the missing body fragment of the incomplete specimens. Galeorhinus cuvieri Eogaleus bolcensis MGP-PD 8869 C- ID MGP-PD 8871-8872 MCSNV T1124 MCSNV VIIB96-VIIB97 MGGC 1976 MNHN FBol516 MCSNV T311 8870 C cm %TL cm %TL cm %TL cm %TL cm %TL cm %TL cm %TL 1 69.4 1 92 1 83+x - 92 1 67+x - 135 1 - - 2 13.9 20.03 16 17.39 18 - 14.6 15.89 15.5+x - 23 17.04 - - 3 35.5 51.15 46 50 42 - 48.3 52.48 37 - 73 54.07 85.7 - 4
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Satellite Technology to Create True Shark Sanctuaries
    UC Santa Barbara UC Santa Barbara Previously Published Works Title Leveraging satellite technology to create true shark sanctuaries Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9c52k6x6 Journal CONSERVATION LETTERS, 12(2) ISSN 1755-263X Authors Bradley, Darcy Mayorga, Juan McCauley, Douglas J et al. Publication Date 2019 DOI 10.1111/conl.12610 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Received: 10 July 2018 Revised: 30 August 2018 Accepted: 9 September 2018 DOI: 10.1111/conl.12610 POLICY PERSPECTIVE Leveraging satellite technology to create true shark sanctuaries Darcy Bradley1,2 Juan Mayorga1,3 Douglas J. McCauley2,4 Reniel B. Cabral1,2 Patric Douglas5 Steven D. Gaines1,2 1 Bren School of Environmental Science & Abstract Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA Shark sanctuaries are an ambitious attempt to protect huge areas of ocean space to 2Marine Science Institute, University of Cali- curtail overfishing of sharks. If shark sanctuaries are to succeed, effective surveil- fornia, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA lance and enforcement is urgently needed. We use a case study with a high level of 3 Pristine Seas, National Geographic Society, illegal shark fishing within a shark sanctuary to help motivate three actionable oppor- Washington, DC 20036, USA tunities to create truly effective shark sanctuaries by leveraging satellite technology: 4Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, (1) require vessel tracking systems; (2) partner with international research organiza- Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA tions; and (3) ban vessels previously associated with illegal fishing from shark sanctu- 5Reef Worlds, Los Angeles, CA 90120, USA aries.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandbar Shark (C
    LCS05/06-DW-36 STANDARDIZED CATCH RATES FOR BLACKTIP SHARK (Carcharhinus limbatus), SANDBAR SHARK (C. plumbeus), AND LARGE COASTAL COMPLEX SHARKS FROM THE MARINE RECREATIONAL FISHERIES STATISTICAL SURVEY (MRFSS). Mauricio Ortiz1 SUMMARY Sharks catch and effort data from the US Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistical Survey of the Atlantic coast and Gulf of Mexico (excluding Texas) were used to update indices of abundance for the blacktip shark, sandbar shark, and the large coastal complex (LCC) (Bull shark, spinner shark, blacktip shark, silky shark, sandbar shark, great hammerhead shark, scalloped hammerhead shark, smooth hammerhead shark, lemon shark, tiger shark and nurse shark) stocks. Standardized catch rates were estimated using a Generalized Linear Mixed modeling approach assuming a delta-lognormal error distribution. The explanatory variables considered for standardization included geographical area, seasonal trimesters, fishing target species, and mode a factor that classifies recreational fishing in shore, headboat, charter or private/rental boat. KEY WORDS Catch/effort, abundance, recreational fisheries, sharks 1 U.S. Department of Commerce National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center Sustainable Fisheries Division 75 Virginia Beach Drive. Miami, Florida 33149 USA Contribution SFD-2005-0## Email: [email protected] 1 LCS05/06-DW-36 Introduction: Indices of abundance from recreational fisheries have been used to tune stock assessment models (Quinn and Deriso 1999). Data collected and estimated by the Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistical Survey (MRFSS) were used to develop standardized catch per unit effort (CPUE) indices for several shark stocks in the Western North Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico area. The recreational fisheries survey started in 1979 and its purpose is to establish a reliable data base for estimating the impact of marine recreational fishing on marine resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing for Sharks History of Shark Finning Protection Towards Sharks Importance of Sharks Sharks Are a Top Predator of the Ocean
    Shark Finning Tiana Barron-Wright Fishing for Sharks History of Shark Finning Protection Towards Sharks Importance of Sharks Sharks are a top predator of the ocean. However, sharks are a target Shark fin soup originated in 968 AD by an emperor from the Sung The Shark Finning Prohibition Act of 2000, was signed by former Sharks play an important role in the ecosystem. Sharks maintain the for humans. Shark finning is the process of cutting off a shark’s Dynasty. The emperor created shark fin soup to display his wealth, President Bill Clinton. This act prohibited the process of shark finning in species below them in the ecosystem and serve as a health indicator for the fins while it is still alive and throwing the shark back into the power and generosity towards his guest. Serving shark fin soup the United States. This bans anyone in the United States jurisdiction from ocean. The decrease of sharks in the oceans has led to the decline of coral ocean where it will die. After getting their fins cut off, some sharks shark finning, owning shark fins without the shark’s body, and landing reefs, sea grass beds, and the loss of commercial fisheries. Without sharks was seen as a show of respect. Chinese Emperors thought the dish in the ecosystem, other predators can thrive. For example, groupers can can starve to death, get eaten by other fish or drown to death. shark fins without the body. This act also has NOAA (National Oceanic had medicinal benefits. Shark fin soup is considered a delicacy in and Atmospheric Administration) Fisheries to give Congress a report increase in numbers and eat herbivores.
    [Show full text]
  • CONCERTED ACTION for the WHALE SHARK (Rhincodon Typus)1 Adopted by the Conference of the Parties at Its 13Th Meeting (Gandhinagar, February 2020)
    CONVENTION ON UNEP/CMS/Concerted Action 12.7 (Rev.COP13) MIGRATORY Original: English SPECIES CONCERTED ACTION FOR THE WHALE SHARK (Rhincodon typus)1 Adopted by the Conference of the Parties at its 13th Meeting (Gandhinagar, February 2020) The Concerted Action for the Whale Shark was first adopted at the 12th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (UNEP/CMS/COP12/Concerted Action 12.7). Reports on implementation were submitted to the 13th Meeting of the Parties (COP13) together with a proposal for extension (UNEP/CMS/COP13/Doc.28.1.7.a and b) and revision (UNEP/CMS/COP13/Doc.28.1.7/Add.2), which was approved by the Parties. (i). Proponent: Government of the Philippines (ii). Target species, lower taxon or population, or group of taxa with needs in common: Class: Chondrichthyes Subclass: Elasmobranchii Order: Orectolobiformes Family: Rhincodontidae Genus: Rhincodon Species: Rhincodon typus Currently listed in CMS Appendix I and CMS Appendix II. (iii). Geographical range: The Whale Shark has a circumtropical distribution through all tropical and warm temperate seas, apart from the Mediterranean (Rowat and Brooks 2012). Their core distribution is between approximately 30°N and 35°S, with occasional seasonal penetration to the north and south (Colman 1997, Rowat and Brooks 2012, Sequeira et al. 2014a). The northernmost records are from 44°N in the Bay of Fundy, Canada (Turnbull and Randell 2006) and the Sea of Okhotsk off Japan (Tomita et al. 2014), with the southernmost from 37°S in Victoria, Australia (Wolfson 1986) and New Zealand (Duffy 2002). Whale Sharks’ distribution is likely to be temperature limited, as they are rarely sighted in surface temperatures of less than 21°C (Colman 1997, Duffy 2002, Afonso et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Palau National Marine Sanctuary Building Palau’S Future and Honoring Its Past
    A fact sheet from Sept 2015 Palau National Marine Sanctuary Building Palau’s future and honoring its past Caring for the environment has long been an important part of Palau’s culture. For centuries, traditional leaders on these Pacific Ocean islands have worked to protect local waters through enactment of a “bul”—a moratorium on catching key species or fishing on certain reefs to protect habitats that are critical to the community’s food security. When Palau became an independent nation in 1994, its founders wrote in the constitution about the need for “conservation of a beautiful, healthful, and resourceful natural environment.” Palau’s waters are worth protecting. Commonly referred to as one of the seven underwater wonders of the world, they boast ecosystems of remarkable biodiversity, which include: • More than 1,300 species of fish. • More than 400 species of hard coral and 300 species of soft coral. • Seven of the world’s nine types of giant clam. • Lakes that are home to nonstinging jellyfish. • The most plant and animal species in Micronesia. Palau is again taking a leading role by moving to create a modern-day bul that puts the marine environment first. On Oct. 28, 2015, after unanimous passage in the National Congress, President Tommy E. Remengesau Jr. signed into law the Palau National Marine Sanctuary Act, establishing one of the world’s largest protected areas of ocean. The sanctuary will fully protect about 80 percent of the nation’s maritime territory. Full protection means that no extractive activities, such as fishing or mining, can take place.
    [Show full text]