DOCSLIB.ORG

The Impact of Variational Assimilation of SSM/I and Quikscat Satellite Observations on the Numerical Simulation of Indian Ocean Tropical Cyclones

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Impact of Variational Assimilation of SSM/I and Quikscat Satellite Observations on the Numerical Simulation of Indian Ocean Tropical Cyclones 460 WEATHER AND FORECASTING VOLUME 23 The Impact of Variational Assimilation of SSM/I and QuikSCAT Satellite Observations on the Numerical Simulation of Indian Ocean Tropical Cyclones RANDHIR SINGH,P.K.PAL,C.M.KISHTAWAL, AND P. C. JOSHI Atmospheric Sciences Division, Meteorology and Oceanography Group, Space Applications Centre (ISRO), Ahmedabad, India (Manuscript received 13 February 2007, in final form 12 June 2007) ABSTRACT In this study, the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–National Center for Atmospheric Re- search Mesoscale Model (MM5) with three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVAR) is utilized to investigate the influence of Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) and Quick Scatterometer (Quik- SCAT) observations on the prediction of an Indian Ocean tropical cyclone. The 3DVAR sensitivity runs were conducted separately with QuikSCAT wind vectors, SSM/I wind speeds, and total precipitable water (TPW) to investigate their individual impact on cyclone intensity and track. The Orissa supercyclone over the Bay of Bengal during October 1999 was used for simulation and assimilation experiments. Assimilation of the QuikSCAT wind vector improves the initial position of the cyclone’s center with a position error of 33 km, which was 163 km in the background analysis. Incorporation of QuikSCAT winds was found to increase the air–sea heat fluxes over the cyclonic region, which resulted in the improved simulated intensity when compared with the simulation made without QuikSCAT winds in the initial conditions. The cyclone track improved significantly with assimilation of QuikSCAT wind vectors. The track improvement resulted from relocation of the initial cyclonic vortex after assimilation of QuikSCAT wind vectors. Like QuikSCAT, assimilation of SSM/I wind speeds strengthened the cyclonic circulation in the initial conditions. This increase in the low-level wind speeds enhanced the air–sea exchange processes and im- proved the simulated intensity of the cyclone. The lack of information about the wind direction from SSM/I prevented it from making much of an impact on track prediction. As compared to the first guess, assimi- lation of the SSM/I TPW shows a moistening of the lower troposphere over most of the Bay of Bengal except over the central region of the cyclone, where the assimilation of SSM/I TPW reduces the lower- tropospheric moisture. This decrease of moisture in the TPW assimilation experiment resulted in a weak cyclone intensity. 1. Introduction ing data from satellites is crucial for improving hurri- cane initial analyses and forecasts (Zou and Xiao 2000; The tropical cyclone is one of the greatest natural Xiao et al. 2000, 2002; Pu and Braun 2001; Chen et al. hazards on Earth. Therefore, forecasting of tropical cy- 2004; Chen 2007). It is now widely recognized that sat- clones is one of the most important components in nu- ellite products have a positive impact on operational merical weather prediction. Tropical cyclone forecasts analyses and forecasts, especially in the data-sparse have improved steadily over the last decade primarily oceanic areas (English et al. 2000). due to the increased use of remote sensing data, par- The accurate initial condition is the foremost prereq- ticularly over the oceans in the tropical cyclone initial- uisite to accurate numerical simulations and prediction. izations in NWP models. Since there are limited con- Data assimilation has been recognized as a useful way ventional observations over the ocean where tropical to obtain better “consistent” initial conditions for nu- cyclones occur and evolve, effective use of remote sens- merical weather prediction (NWP). One of the most attractive and effective methods of data assimilation is the variational technique, which is based on an estima- Corresponding author address: Randhir Singh, Atmospheric Sciences Division, Meteorology and Oceanography Group, Space tion theory that constructs a theoretical basis for varia- Applications Centre (ISRO), Ahmedabad 380015, India. tional analyses in the minimization of the bias of the E-mail: [email protected] analyzed data (Gelb et al. 1974). A current area of DOI: 10.1175/2007WAF2007014.1 © 2008 American Meteorological Society Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/01/21 09:17 PM UTC WAF2007014 JUNE 2008 SINGHETAL. 461 interest in data assimilation is how to properly ity observations in the model initialization process. The and effectively assimilate large amounts of data avail- conventional observational network of the World Me- able from current satellites. The synthesis of different teorological Organization (WMO; e.g., upper-air radio- sources of data has become one of the most important sondes and surface stations) provides moisture obser- issues of data assimilation (Zhu et al. 2002; Zhao et al. vations, but these are mostly distributed over land with 2005; Chen 2007; Zhang et al. 2007). soundings usually available only twice a day. This is Air–sea interactions including heat, momentum, and insufficient to sample the rapidly evolving environment moisture fluxes play a vital role in the formation and of marine weather systems, such as tropical cyclones, intensification of the tropical cyclones (Kuo and Low- adequately. Nonconventional observations, such as sat- Nam 1990; Kuo et al. 1991: Miller and Katsaros 1992; ellite data, on the other hand, can provide spatially Singh 2004). Near-surface winds play a dominant role dense information with high frequency. Satellite mea- in air–sea interactions processes (Liu 1988; Geernaert surements of water vapor could be a useful source of 1990; Chou et al. 2003; Bao et al. 2000; Singh et al. additional humidity information in analyses over 2006). Fortunately, several satellites have observed oceans, where the conventional measurements (radio- winds over the ocean during the last two decades, sonde and meteorological station) are very sparse. such as the Geosat altimeter, the National Aeronautics There are several satellite instruments that measure at- and Space Administration (NASA) Scatterometer mospheric moisture, including the Advanced Micro- (NSCAT), the Quick Scatterometer (QuikSCAT), the wave Sounding Unit (AMSU-B) humidity sounder Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I), the Euro- (English et al. 1994; Rosenkranz 2001), the High Reso- pean Space Agency’s first and second European Re- lution Infrared Radiation Sounder (HIRS; McNally mote Sensing satellites (ERS-1/2; Isakessen and Stof- and Vesperini 1996; Derber and Wu 1998; Engelen and felen 2000; Leidner et al. 2003), and water vapor or Stephens 1999; Escoffier et al. 2001), the SSM/I, and the cloud-derived satellite winds. The scatterometer pro- Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS). vides both surface wind speed and direction, which sig- In this study, fifth-generation Pennsylvania State nificantly increases the tropical cyclone (TC) forecast- University–National Center for Atmospheric Research er’s knowledge of TC formation and TC surface wind Mesoscale Model (MM5) three-dimensional variational structure. Global coverage of scatterometer data has data assimilation (3DVAR) (Barker et al. 2004) sensi- been routinely available (Tomassini et al. 1998) to fore- tivity experiments are conducted separately with Quik- casters and researchers since 1991 from the ERS-1 and SCAT and SSM/I data to investigate their individual ERS-2. However, ERS satellites often did not provide impacts on storm track and intensity. The case of the adequate coverage (Andrews and Bell 1998; Rufenach Orissa supercyclone over the Bay of Bengal during Oc- 1998) of TCs due to the narrow swaths (ϳ500 km) of tober 1999 was chosen for this study to explore the these satellites. This situation changed following the impact of assimilated QuikSCAT and SSM/I observa- launch of the QuikSCAT satellite in 1999, with its Sea- tions on model simulation. The paper is arranged as Winds instrument offering near-continuous daily cov- follows. In section 2, we briefly describe the Orissa su- erage of over 90% of the tropical oceans with a wide percyclone. The satellite data used in this study are swath of 1800 km. Ebuchi et al. (2002) found that the summarized in section 3. The MM5 model and its wind speeds and directions observed by QuikSCAT 3DVAR formalism, as well as the experimental design, agree well with the buoy data. The root-mean-squared are presented in section 4. Results are discussed in sec- differences of the wind speed and direction for the stan- tion 5. The paper is concluded in section 6. dard wind data products are 1.01 m sϪ1 and 23°, respec- tively. Katsaros et al. (2001) demonstrated that Quik- 2. Synoptic overview of the Orissa supercyclone SCAT provides valuable information about ambient over the Bay of Bengal (26–29 October 1999) surface wind fields in which tropical cyclones were em- bedded. Mohanty et al. (2004) and Singh et al. (2005) describe It is well known now (Xiao et al. 2002; Chen et al. the supercyclone of 26–29 October 1999 as the most 2004) that atmospheric moisture is crucial to the evo- intense tropical cyclone in the history of Orissa (India) lution of severe weather systems because of its poten- in the last 114 yr, or since the false-point cyclone of tial to release large amounts of latent heat. Therefore, September 1885. The state of Orissa, located on India’s uncertainties in the initial conditions of the humidity east coast, was battered for more than 2 days by fierce field in numerical weather prediction models could winds and intense rain. The storm also produced a huge have a significant impact on weather forecasts. These storm surge and catastrophic floods. uncertainties can be reduced through the use of humid- Figure 1 shows the Indian Meteorological Depart- Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/01/21 09:17 PM UTC 462 WEATHER AND FORECASTING VOLUME 23 3. Satellite datasets a. QuikSCAT The NASA Quick Scatterometer (QuikSCAT) was launched in June 1999. It circles the earth at an altitude of 800 km once every 101 min. The QuikSCAT satellite (Shirtliffe 1999) swath width is about 1800 km. The SeaWinds instrument aboard the QuikSCAT satellite is a 13.4-GHz Ku-band conical-scanning microwave ra- dar.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AN INTRODUCTION to DATA ASSIMILATION the Availability Of
    AN INTRODUCTION TO DATA ASSIMILATION AMIT APTE Abstract. This talk will introduce the audience to the main features of the problem of data assimilation, give some of the mathematical formulations of this problem, and present a specific example of application of these ideas in the context of Burgers' equation. The availability of ever increasing amounts of observational data in most fields of sciences, in particular in earth sciences, and the exponentially increasing computing resources have together lead to completely new approaches to resolving many of the questions in these sciences, and indeed to formulation of new questions that could not be asked or answered without the use of these data or the computations. In the context of earth sciences, the temporal as well as spatial variability is an important and essential feature of data about the oceans and the atmosphere, capturing the inherent dynamical, multiscale, chaotic nature of the systems being observed. This has led to development of mathematical methods that blend such data with computational models of the atmospheric and oceanic dynamics - in a process called data assimilation - with the aim of providing accurate state estimates and uncertainties associated with these estimates. This expository talk (and this short article) aims to introduce the audience (and the reader) to the main ideas behind the problem of data assimilation, specifically in the context of earth sciences. I will begin by giving a brief, but not a complete or exhaustive, historical overview of the problem of numerical weather prediction, mainly to emphasize the necessity for data assimilation. This discussion will lead to a definition of this problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Radar Data Assimilation
    Radar Data Assimilation David Dowell Assimilation and Modeling Branch NOAA/ESRL/GSD, Boulder, CO Acknowledgment: Warn-on-Forecast project Radar Data Assimilation (for analysis and prediction of convective storms) David Dowell Assimilation and Modeling Branch NOAA/ESRL/GSD, Boulder, CO Acknowledgment: Warn-on-Forecast project Atmospheric Data Assimilation Definition: using all available information – observations and physical laws (numerical models) – to estimate as accurately as possible the state of the atmosphere (Talagrand 1997) Atmospheric Data Assimilation Definition: using all available information – observations and physical laws (numerical models) – to estimate as accurately as possible the state of the atmosphere (Talagrand 1997) Applications: 1. Initializing NWP models NOAA NCEP, NCAR RAL Atmospheric Data Assimilation Definition: using all available information – observations and physical laws (numerical models) – to estimate as accurately as possible the state of the atmosphere (Talagrand 1997) Applications: 1. Initializing NWP models NOAA NCEP, NCAR RAL 2. Diagnosing atmospheric processes (analysis) Schultz and Knox 2009 Assimilating a Radar Observation radar observation (Doppler velocity, reflectivity, …) gridded model fields (wind, temperature, What field(s) should the radar ob. should affect? pressure, humidity, By how much? And how far from the ob.? rain, snow, …) determined by background error covariances (b.e.c.) Various methods have been developed for estimating and using b.e.c.: 3DVar, 4DVar, EnKF, hybrid, … Most
    [Show full text]
  • 5B.2 4-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation for the Weather Research and Forecasting Model
    5B.2 4-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation for the Weather Research and Forecasting Model Xiang-Yu Huang*1, Qingnong Xiao1, Xin Zhang2, John Michalakes1, Wei Huang1, Dale M. Barker1, John Bray1, Zaizhong Ma1, Tom Henderson1, Jimy Dudhia1, Xiaoyan Zhang1, Duk-Jin Won3, Yongsheng Chen1, Yongrun Guo1, Hui-Chuan Lin1, Ying-Hwa Kuo1 1National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA 2University of Hawaii, Hawaii, USA 3Korean Meteorological Administration, Seoul, South Korea 1. Introduction The 4D-Var prototype was built in 2005 and has under continuous refinement since then. Many single observation experiments have been carried out to The 4-dimensional variational data assimilation validate the correctness of the 4D-Var formulation. A (4D-Var) (Le Dimet and Talagrand, 1986; Lewis and series of real data experiments have been conducted to Derber, 1985) has been pursued actively by research assess the performance of the 4D-Var (Huang et al. community and operational centers over the past two th 2006). Another year of fast development of 4D-Var has decades. The 5 generation Pennsylvania State led to the completion of a basic system, which will be University – National Center for Atmospheric Research described in section 3. mesoscale model (MM5) based 4D-Var (Zou et al. 1995; Ruggiero et al. 2006), for example, has been widely used for more than 10 years. There are also 2. The WRF 4D-Var Algorithm successful operational implementations of 4D-Var (e.g. Rabier et al. 2000). The WRF 4D-Var follows closely the incremental The 4D-Var technique has a number of advantages 4D-Var formulation of Courtier et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Assimilation of GOES-16 Radiances and Retrievals Into the Warn-On-Forecast System
    MAY 2020 J O N E S E T A L . 1829 Assimilation of GOES-16 Radiances and Retrievals into the Warn-on-Forecast System THOMAS A. JONES,PATRICK SKINNER, AND NUSRAT YUSSOUF Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, and National Severe Storms Laboratory, and University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma Downloaded from http://journals.ametsoc.org/mwr/article-pdf/148/5/1829/4928277/mwrd190379.pdf by NOAA Central Library user on 11 August 2020 KENT KNOPFMEIER AND ANTHONY REINHART Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, and National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma XUGUANG WANG University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma KRISTOPHER BEDKA AND WILLIAM SMITH JR. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia RABINDRA PALIKONDA Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, Virginia (Manuscript received 14 November 2019, in final form 28 January 2020) ABSTRACT The increasing maturity of the Warn-on-Forecast System (WoFS) coupled with the now operational GOES-16 satellite allows for the first time a comprehensive analysis of the relative impacts of assimilating GOES-16 all-sky 6.2-, 6.9-, and 7.3-mm channel radiances compared to other radar and satellite observations. The WoFS relies on cloud property retrievals such as cloud water path, which have been proven to increase forecast skill compared to only assimilating radar data and other conventional observations. The impacts of assimilating clear-sky radiances have also been explored and shown to provide useful information on midtropospheric moisture content in the near-storm environment. Assimilation of all-sky radiances adds a layer of complexity and is tested to determine its effectiveness across four events occurring in the spring and summer of 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Results of Observation Data Denial Experiments
    Recent results of observation data denial experiments Weather Science Technical Report 641 24th February 2021 Brett Candy, James Cotton and John Eyre www.metoffice.gov.uk © Crown Copyright 2021, Met Office Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 2 2 Operational NWP configuration ...................................................................................... 3 3 Data Denial Experiments ............................................................................................... 6 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Results ................................................................................................................ 8 3.3 Continued Impact of POES............................................................................... 12 3.4 Verification of Tropical Cyclone Tracks .............................................................. 15 3.5 A Data Denial Experiment including withdrawal from the ensemble ................... 16 4 FSOI Results ............................................................................................................... 18 5 Conclusions ................................................................................................................. 21 Acknowledgements
    [Show full text]
  • Convective Scale Data Assimilation and Nowcasting
    Convective Scale Data Assimilation and Nowcasting Susan P Ballard1, Bruce Macpherson2, Zhihong Li1, David Simonin1, Jean-Francois Caron1, Helen Buttery1, Cristina Charlton-Perez1, Nicolas Gaussiat2, Lee Hawkness-Smith1 ,Chiara Piccolo2, Graeme Kelly1, Robert Tubbs1, Gareth Dow2 and Richard Renshaw2 1 Met Office, Dept of Meteorology, University of Reading, RG6 6BB [email protected] 2 Met Office, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX31 3PB Abstract Increasing availability of computer power and nonhydrostatic models has made limited area NWP at convective scales, 1-4km resolution, a reality for National Met Services in the past few years. At this time around the world nudging, variational data assimilation and ensemble Kalman filters are being used or developed for high resolution data assimilation in research centres and weather services, and are already operational in some Weather Services, for high resolution models in the range 1-10km. This paper reviews some of the issues relating to convective scale limited area data assimilation and in particular their application in NWP-based nowcasting. 1. Introduction Increasing availability of computer power and nonhydrostatic models has made limited area NWP at convective scales, 1-4km resolution, a reality for National Met Services in the past few years. Many services are already using these systems operationally for short-range forecasting up to about T+36hours every 3 or 6hours (Honda et al 2005, Saito et al 2006, Stephan et al 2008, Seity et al 2011, Brousseau et al 2011, Bauer et al 2011). These forecasts are also used for merging with traditional nowcasting techniques to extend the skilful forecast range e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • TC Modelling and Data Assimilation
    Tropical Cyclone Modeling and Data Assimilation Jason Sippel NOAA AOML/HRD 2021 WMO Workshop at NHC Outline • History of TC forecast improvements in relation to model development • Ongoing developments • Future direction: A new model History: Error trends Official TC Track Forecast Errors: • Hurricane track forecasts 1990-2020 have improved markedly 300 • The average Day-3 forecast location error is 200 now about what Day-1 error was in 1990 100 • These improvements are 1990 2020 largely tied to improvements in large- scale forecasts History: Error trends • Hurricane track forecasts have improved markedly • The average Day-3 forecast location error is now about what Day-1 error was in 1990 • These improvements are largely tied to improvements in large- scale forecasts History: Error trends Official TC Intensity Forecast Errors: 1990-2020 • Hurricane intensity 30 forecasts have only recently improved 20 • Improvement in intensity 10 forecast largely corresponds with commencement of 0 1990 2020 Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project HFIP era History: Error trends HWRF Intensity Skill 40 • Significant focus of HFIP has been the 20 development of the HWRF better 0 Climo better HWRF model -20 -40 • As a result, HWRF intensity has improved Day 1 Day 3 Day 5 significantly over the past decade HWRF skill has improved up to 60%! Michael Talk focus: How better use of data, particularly from recon, has helped improve forecasts Michael Talk focus: How better use of data, particularly from recon, has helped improve forecasts History: Using TC Observations
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Principles and Methods of Data Assimilation in the Geosciences
    Introduction to the principles and methods of data assimilation in the geosciences Lecture notes Master M2 MOCIS & WAPE Ecole´ des Ponts ParisTech Revision 0.42 Marc Bocquet CEREA, Ecole´ des Ponts ParisTech 14 January 2014 - 17 February 2014 based on an update of the 2004-2014 lecture notes in French Last revision: 13 March 2021 2 Introduction to data assimilation Contents Synopsis i Textbooks and lecture notes iii Acknowledgements v I Methods of data assimilation 1 1 Statistical interpolation 3 1.1 Introduction . 3 1.1.1 Representation of the physical system . 3 1.1.2 The observational system . 5 1.1.3 Error modelling . 5 1.1.4 The estimation problem . 8 1.2 Statistical interpolation . 9 1.2.1 An Ansatz for the estimator . 9 1.2.2 Optimal estimation: the BLUE analysis . 11 1.2.3 Properties . 11 1.3 Variational equivalence . 13 1.3.1 Equivalence with BLUE . 14 1.3.2 Properties of the variational approach . 14 1.3.3 When the observation operator H is non-linear . 15 1.3.4 Dual formalism . 15 1.4 A simple example . 16 1.4.1 Observation equation and error covariance matrix . 16 1.4.2 Optimal analysis . 16 1.4.3 Posterior error . 17 1.4.4 3D-Var and PSAS . 18 2 Sequential interpolation: The Kalman filter 19 2.1 Stochastic modelling of the system . 20 2.1.1 Analysis step . 21 2.1.2 Forecast step . 21 2.2 Summary, limiting cases and example . 22 2.2.1 No observation . 22 2.2.2 Perfect observations .
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Radar Reflectivity and Lightning Data Assimilation
    atmosphere Article Impact of Radar Reflectivity and Lightning Data Assimilation on the Rainfall Forecast and Predictability of a Summer Convective Thunderstorm in Southern Italy Stefano Federico 1 , Rosa Claudia Torcasio 1,* , Silvia Puca 2, Gianfranco Vulpiani 2, Albert Comellas Prat 3, Stefano Dietrich 1 and Elenio Avolio 4 1 National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (CNR-ISAC), Via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (S.F.); [email protected] (S.D.) 2 Dipartimento Protezione Civile Nazionale, 00189 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (G.V.) 3 National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (CNR-ISAC), Strada Pro.Le Lecce-Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy; [email protected] 4 National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (CNR-ISAC), Zona Industriale ex SIR, 88046 Lamezia Terme, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Heavy and localized summer events are very hard to predict and, at the same time, potentially dangerous for people and properties. This paper focuses on an event occurred on 15 July 2020 in Palermo, the largest city of Sicily, causing about 120 mm of rainfall in 3 h. The aim is to investigate the event predictability and a potential way to improve the precipitation forecast. To reach Citation: Federico, S.; Torcasio, R.C.; this aim, lightning (LDA) and radar reflectivity data assimilation (RDA) was applied. LDA was able Puca, S.; Vulpiani, G.; Comellas Prat, to trigger deep convection over Palermo, with high precision, whereas the RDA had a key role in the A.; Dietrich, S.; Avolio, E.
    [Show full text]
  • Ensemble Forecasting and Data Assimilation: Two Problems with the Same Solution?
    Ensemble forecasting and data assimilation: two problems with the same solution? Eugenia Kalnay(1,2), Brian Hunt(2), Edward Ott(2) and Istvan Szunyogh(1,2) (1)Department of Meteorology and (2)Chaos Group University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742 1. Introduction Until 1991, operational NWP centers used to run a single computer forecast started from initial conditions given by the analysis, which is the best available estimate of the state of the atmosphere at the initial time. In December 1992, both NCEP and ECMWF started running ensembles of forecasts from slightly perturbed initial conditions (Molteni and Palmer, 1993, Buizza et al, 1998, Buizza, 2005, Toth and Kalnay, 1993, Tracton and Kalnay, 1993, Toth and Kalnay, 1997). Ensemble forecasting provides human forecasters with a range of possible solutions, whose average is generally more accurate than the single deterministic forecast (e.g., Fig. 4), and whose spread gives information about the forecast errors. It also provides a quantitative basis for probabilistic forecasting. Schematic Fig. 1 shows the essential components of an ensemble: a control forecast started from the analysis, two additional forecasts started from two perturbations to the analysis (in this example the same perturbation is added and subtracted from the analysis so that the ensemble mean perturbation is zero), the ensemble average, and the “truth”, or forecast verification, which becomes available later. The first schematic shows an example of a “good ensemble” in which “truth” looks like a member of the ensemble. In this case, the ensemble average is closer to the truth than the control due to nonlinear filtering of errors, and the ensemble spread is related to the forecast error.
    [Show full text]
  • Assimilation of Quikscat/Seawinds Ocean Surface Wind Data Into the JMA Global Data Assimilation System
    Technical Review No. 7 (March 2004) RSMC Tokyo - Typhoon Center Assimilation of QuikSCAT/SeaWinds Ocean Surface Wind Data into the JMA Global Data Assimilation System Yasuaki Ohhashi Numerical Prediction Division, Japan Meteorological Agency 1. Introduction A satellite-borne scatterometer obtains the surface wind vectors over the ocean by measuring the radar signal returned from the sea surface. It provides valuable information such as a typhoon center for numerical weather prediction (NWP) over the ocean, where conventional in situ observations are sparse. Observational data from the European Remote-Sensing Satellite 2 (ERS2) /Active Microwave Instrument (AMI) scatterometer launched by the European Space Agency (ESA) was used operationally at the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) from July 1998 to January 2001. A new scatterometer named SeaWinds was launched onboard the QuikSCAT satellite by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)/Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) on 19 June 1999. It was a “quick recovery” mission to fill the gap created by the loss of data from the NASA Scatterometer (NSCAT), when the Japanese Advanced Earth Observation Satellite (ADEOS) lost power in June 1997. The width of swath of QuikSCAT/SeaWinds is 1800 km, which is wider than that of ERS2/AMI by three times, with a spatial resolution of 25 km. Daily coverage is more than 90% of the global ice-free oceans. Figure 1 shows an example of QuikSCAT/SeaWinds observation. The QuikSCAT/SeaWinds observes with higher density than ship or buoy. A cyclonic Fig.1 Wind data around typhoon T0306 (SOUDELOR) observed by QuikSCAT/SeaWinds. Observation time is about 10 UTC 17 June 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Assimilation Experiments at Ncep Designed to Test Quality Control Procedures and Effective Scale Resolutions for Quikscat / Seawinds Data
    ASSIMILATION EXPERIMENTS AT NCEP DESIGNED TO TEST QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES AND EFFECTIVE SCALE RESOLUTIONS FOR QUIKSCAT / SEAWINDS DATA Yu, T.-W.,* and W. H. Gemmill Environmental Modeling Center, National Centers for Environmental Prediction NWS, NOAA, Washington, D. C. 20233 1. INTRODUCTION The second step is the OIQC quality control procedure, which essentially performs a gross error Since January 15, 2002, QuikSCAT wind data have check and a buddy check among like kinds of data, been operationally used in the global data assimilation and is applied to all of global observations within the system (GDAS) at the National Centers for SSI analysis scheme (Wollen,1991). Detailed Environmental Prediction (NCEP). However, there investigation of the OIQC quality control procedure remain at least two outstanding issues on the use of is the subject of forthcoming articles, but suffices it to QuikSCAT wind data in operational numerical weather point out that the OIQC procedure eliminates only prediction. The first issue is related to the rain about 0.1% of the QuikSCAT wind data in a GDAS contamination problem in QuikSCAT wind data, and cycle. Table 1 shows a distribution of TOSSLIST of therefore design of a good quality control procedure QuikSCAT wind data rejected by the OIQC quality for the data becomes critically important. This paper control procedure for 0000 UTC investigates two quality control procedures especially January 19, 2001 of the NCEP global data designed for QuikSCAT winds. The second issue assimilation cycle. These numbers are quite typical, concerns with what scale resolutions of QuikSCAT and they show that the total number of QuikSCAT wind data are the most effective and compatible to the wind data in the analysis cycle is 193,142, of which NCEP atmospheric analysis and data assimilation only 266 observations are rejected by the OIQC system.
    [Show full text]