Conformal Field Theory (For String Theorists)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conformal Field Theory (For String Theorists) YITP-SB-15-?? Conformal Field Theory (for string theorists) Christopher P. Herzog C. N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794 Abstract A write up of about ten lectures on conformal field theory given as part of a first semester course on string theory. Contents 1 Opening Remarks 1 2 Conformal Transformations in One and Two Dimensions are Special 3 3 Correlation Functions are Highly Constrained by Conformal Symmetry 4 4 Noether's Theorem 6 5 Conformal Anomaly 8 6 Path Integral Approach 15 7 BRST meets CFT 19 8 From Operators to States: The Vacuum 23 8.1 Bosonization . 27 8.2 R Sector Fermions . 28 8.3 The βγ System . 30 9 From Operators to States: Virasoro and Super Virasoro 32 10 Thermal Partition Function 35 A Bosonization and Cocycles 36 1 Opening Remarks To date in this class, string theory boils down to the study four free (quadratic) quantum field theories: one for the X fields, one for the fields, one for the bc ghost system, and one for the βγ ghost system. We saw a BRST action that coupled the X and fields to world-sheet supergravity, and hence required the presence of the bc and βγ ghosts in addition to some auxiliary fields d and ∆ and also ghosts for the Weyl and super-Weyl symmetry. After some elementary path-integral manipulations, these extra fields dropped out, and we were left with simple, quadratic actions for the remaining X, , bc and βγ fields on a flat world sheet hab = ηab. The full quantum world-sheet supergravity action had a number of symmetries which are no longer evident in the gauge fixed action for X, , bc and βγ. Among other symmetries, the full quantum action had world-sheet diffeomorphism invariance, σ ! σ0(σ). Under diffeomorphisms, the metric changes in the usual way a b 0 0 @σ @σ h (σ ) = hab(σ) : (1) cd @σ0c @σ0d 1 Another symmetry was world-sheet Weyl invariance, hab ! Λ(x)hab. There were then corresponding rules for how the fields X, , bc, and βγ transform under diffeomorphisms and Weyl scaling. We gauge fixed by choosing a flat world-sheet metric hab = ηab. However, this gauge fixing is not complete. There are residual gauge transformations that are a combination of a diffeomorphism and a Weyl scaling that leave the metric ηab invariant. These residual gauge transformations are called conformal transformations: Definition. A conformal transformation is a map on coordinates σ ! σ0 that preserves the metric up to a scale factor 0 hab(σ) = Λ(σ)hab(σ) : Example. In the case when hab = ηab, two conformal transformations are • Elements of the Poincar´egroup (Lorentz group and translations) for which Λ = 1. • Dilations x ! λx, λ 2 R, for which Λ = λ2. Note in the Euclidean case, hab = δab, the Lorentz group is replaced by rotations. Both rota- tions and dilations manifestly preserve the angles between vectors, motivating the choice of word \conformal", which means preserving angles. Remark. The set of conformal transformations C forms a group when the transformation σ ! σ0 is invertible. Definition. A conformal field theory is a quantum field theory which has C as a classical symmetry of the action. Almost all the quantum field theories we study, when coupled to gravity, will be diffeomorphism invariant. The litmus test for figuring out when a quantum field theory in a fixed background space- time is a conformal field theory is then the presence of local Weyl invariance. Perhaps as a result, in the literature there is a certain carelessness and interchanging in the use of the words Weyl scaling and conformal transformation. We will try to be careful here. Having fixed hab = ηab, the field theories for X, , bc, and βγ become examples of conformal field theories. In fact, we will eventually see they are essentially all the same conformal field theory, just expressed in different variables. We can therefore use the extensive and highly developed machinery of conformal field theory to systematize our understanding of these four systems. The goal of these lectures will be four-fold: 1. To replace the cumbersome oscillator algebra manipulations with (in our view) more elegant operator product expansions. 2. To streamline calculations involving the BRST symmetry. 3. To understand how a quantum anomaly in the classical conformal symmetry restricts the types of consistent string theories. 4. To set up machinery for string scattering calculations. 2 References These lecture notes draw largely from chapters 2, 3, 6, 8, and 10 of Polchinski's classic string theory text book [1]. I have also drawn on early chapters in Di Francesco, S´en´echal, and Mathieu's classic work on conformal field theory [2] and P. van Nieuwenhuizen's unpublished string theory lecture notes [3]. Another nice publicly available reference I found are unpublished notes by M. Kreuzer [4]. 2 Conformal Transformations in One and Two Dimensions are Special 0 @x @x In one dimension, any diffeomorphism y(x) is conformal with gyy = @y @y gxx. 1 In two dimensions, for convenience, consider the Euclidean case hab = δab. We take advantage of complex numbers: z = σ1 + iσ2 ; z¯ = σ1 − iσ2 ; (2) 1 1 @ ≡ @ = (@ − i@ ) ; @¯ ≡ @ = (@ + i@ ) : (3) z 2 1 2 z¯ 2 1 2 The world sheet metric then has components 1 h = h = ; h = h = 0 : (4) zz¯ zz¯ 2 zz z¯z¯ In complex coordinates, any holomorphic transformation z ! w(z) along with its anti-holomorphic counterpartz ¯ ! w¯(¯z) is conformal: @z @z¯ @z @z¯ h0 (w; w¯) = h (z; z¯) where Λ = : (5) ww¯ @w @w¯ zz¯ @w @w¯ In more than two dimensions, the set of conformal transformations is far smaller. It is generated by • translations: xµ ! xµ + aµ. • dilations: xµ ! axµ. µ µ ν • rigid rotations: x ! M ν x . • special conformal transformations: xµ − bµx2 xµ ! : 1 − 2b · x − b2x2 In d Euclidean dimensions, these transformations generate a connected part of the Lorentz group SO+(1; d + 1). This group forms an important subgroup of the conformal transformations in d = 2, where it is isomorphic to the set of Moebius transformations on the complex plane, SO+(1; 3) = 1To return to the Lorentzian case, one can make the Wick rotation σ0 = −iσ2. 3 P SL(2; C). In particular, translations, dilations, rotations, and special conformal transformations on the plane combine to give the transformation rule az + b z ! ; (6) cz + d where a, b, c, and d 2 C. Without further conditions on a, b, c, and d, this map would be in GL(2; C). However, as multiplying a, b, c, and d by an overall scale factor does not change the transformation rule, we are free to set ad − bc = 1 and restrict to SL(2; C). Furthermore, the map is invariant under the sign flip (a; b; c; d) ! (−a; −b; −c; −d), which restricts the group to P SL(2; C). We can also consider the corresponding Lie algebra sl(2; C) for P SL(2; C). This Lie algebra has the generators conventionally labeled 2 L−1 = @z ;L0 = z@z ;L1 = z @z : (7) (There is another copy of sl(2; C) generated by complex conjugates of L0, L−1, and L1.) The operator L−1 generates a translation, L0 a combination of dilation and rotation, and L1 a special conformal transformation. These generators satisfy the standard sl(2; C) Lie algebra [L0;L−1] = −L−1 ; [L0;L1] = L1 ; [L−1;L1] = 2L0 : (8) (In quantum mechanics, we might make the replacements L0 ! Jz, L−1 ! J−, and L1 ! J+.) An infinite dimensional representation of this algebra is furnished by the monomials zn where n n n n±1 L0z = nz ;L±1z = nz : (9) At first sight there is something a bit odd about this representation; under what inner product do the eigenvectors zn have finite norm and is there a notion of Hermiticity? To obtain an inner product, we make the transformation z = e−it. Under this transformation, we find the new generators −it it L−1 = −ie @t ;L0 = −i@t ;L1 = −ie @t : (10) There is then an obvious inner product based on the orthogonality of Fourier modes on the circle, Z 2π int y imt (e ) (e )dt = 2πδn;m ; (11) 0 and under which L0 is now clearly Hermitian. Back in the z coordinate, interestingly, this inner product corresponds to a contour integral along the curve jzj = 1. This so-called plane to cylinder map z = eit along with corresponding contour integrals will play a key role as we go forward. 3 Correlation Functions are Highly Constrained by Confor- mal Symmetry The transformation properties of fields fix two and also three point functions up to some undeter- mined constants. Previously in the class, we saw examples of how X and transform infinitesimally 4 under such conformal transformations. The finite versions of those rules are as follows: @w @ X0(z; z¯) = @ X(w; w¯) ; (12) z @z w @w 1=2 0(z) = (w) : (13) @z The fields @X and are examples of primary fields. More generally we have the definition: Definition. For any meromorphic map z ! w(z), a primary field satisfies the transformation rule ¯ @w −h @w¯ −h φ0(w; w¯) = φ(z; z¯) : (14) @z @z¯ The quantity h is called the holomorphic conformal dimension, h¯ the anti-holomorphic conformal dimension. The quantities h + h¯ = ∆ are the conformal (or scaling) dimension and h − h¯ = s the spin. Applying this definition to our two examples, we find that h = 1 and h¯ = 0 for @X while h = 1=2 and h¯ = 0 for .
Recommended publications
  • Spectra of Conformal Sigma Models
    Spectra of Conformal Sigma Models Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades an der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften Fachbereich Physik der Universität Hamburg vorgelegt von Václav Tlapák aus Berlin Hamburg 2014 Tag der Disputation: 30. Januar 2015 Folgende Gutachter empfehlen die Annahme der Dissertation: Prof. Dr. Volker Schomerus Prof. Dr. Gleb Arutyunov Zusammenfassung Die vorliegende Arbeit beschäftigt sich mit den Spektren von konformen Sigma Modellen, die auf (verallgemeinerten) symmetrischen Räumen defi- niert sind. Die Räume, auf denen Sigma Modelle ohne Wess-Zumino-Term konform sind, sind Supermannigfaltigkeiten, also Mannigfaltigkeiten, die fermionische Richtungen aufweisen. Wir stellen die Konstruktion von Ver- tex Operatoren vor, gefolgt von der Hintergrundfeld-Entwicklung. Für semi- symmetrische Räume berechnen wir anschließend die diagonalen Terme der anomalen Dimensionen dieser Operatoren in führender Ordnung. Das Resul- tat stimmt mit dem für symmetrische Räume überein, jedoch treten nicht- diagonale Terme auf, die hier nicht weiter betrachtet werden. Anschließend präsentieren wir eine detaillierte Analyse des Spectrums des Supersphären S3j2 Sigma Modells. Dies ist eins der einfachsten Beispie- le für konforme Sigma Modelle auf symmetrischen Räumen und dient als Illustration für die Mächtigkeit der vorgestellten Methoden. Wir verwenden die erhaltenen Daten, um eine Dualität mit dem OSP(4j2) Gross-Neveu Modell zu untersuchen, die von Candu und Saleur vorgeschlagen wurde. Wir verwenden dazu ein Resultat, welches die anomalen Dimensionen von 1 2 BPS Operatoren zu allen Ordnungen berechnet. Wir finden das gesamte Grundzustandsspektrum des Sigma Modells. Darüber hinaus legen wir dar, dass sowohl die Zwangsbedingungen als auch die Bewegungsgleichungen des Sigma Modells korrekt vom Gross-Neveu Modell implementiert werden. Die Dualität wird weiterhin durch ein neues exaktes Resultat für die anomalen Dimensionen der Grundzustände unterstützt.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulating Quantum Field Theory with a Quantum Computer
    Simulating quantum field theory with a quantum computer John Preskill Lattice 2018 28 July 2018 This talk has two parts (1) Near-term prospects for quantum computing. (2) Opportunities in quantum simulation of quantum field theory. Exascale digital computers will advance our knowledge of QCD, but some challenges will remain, especially concerning real-time evolution and properties of nuclear matter and quark-gluon plasma at nonzero temperature and chemical potential. Digital computers may never be able to address these (and other) problems; quantum computers will solve them eventually, though I’m not sure when. The physics payoff may still be far away, but today’s research can hasten the arrival of a new era in which quantum simulation fuels progress in fundamental physics. Frontiers of Physics short distance long distance complexity Higgs boson Large scale structure “More is different” Neutrino masses Cosmic microwave Many-body entanglement background Supersymmetry Phases of quantum Dark matter matter Quantum gravity Dark energy Quantum computing String theory Gravitational waves Quantum spacetime particle collision molecular chemistry entangled electrons A quantum computer can simulate efficiently any physical process that occurs in Nature. (Maybe. We don’t actually know for sure.) superconductor black hole early universe Two fundamental ideas (1) Quantum complexity Why we think quantum computing is powerful. (2) Quantum error correction Why we think quantum computing is scalable. A complete description of a typical quantum state of just 300 qubits requires more bits than the number of atoms in the visible universe. Why we think quantum computing is powerful We know examples of problems that can be solved efficiently by a quantum computer, where we believe the problems are hard for classical computers.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 30 January 2017 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Bhattacharya, Jyotirmoy and Lipstein, Arthur E. (2016) '6d dual conformal symmetry and minimal volumes in AdS.', Journal of high energy physics., 2016 (12). p. 105. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2016)105 Publisher's copyright statement: Open Access, c The Authors. Article funded by SCOAP3. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Published for SISSA by Springer Received: November 16, 2016 Revised: December 8, 2016 Accepted: December 12, 2016 Published: December 20, 2016 6d dual conformal symmetry and minimal volumes JHEP12(2016)105 in AdS Jyotirmoy Bhattacharya and Arthur E.
    [Show full text]
  • Conformal Symmetry in Field Theory and in Quantum Gravity
    universe Review Conformal Symmetry in Field Theory and in Quantum Gravity Lesław Rachwał Instituto de Física, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília DF 70910-900, Brazil; [email protected] Received: 29 August 2018; Accepted: 9 November 2018; Published: 15 November 2018 Abstract: Conformal symmetry always played an important role in field theory (both quantum and classical) and in gravity. We present construction of quantum conformal gravity and discuss its features regarding scattering amplitudes and quantum effective action. First, the long and complicated story of UV-divergences is recalled. With the development of UV-finite higher derivative (or non-local) gravitational theory, all problems with infinities and spacetime singularities might be completely solved. Moreover, the non-local quantum conformal theory reveals itself to be ghost-free, so the unitarity of the theory should be safe. After the construction of UV-finite theory, we focused on making it manifestly conformally invariant using the dilaton trick. We also argue that in this class of theories conformal anomaly can be taken to vanish by fine-tuning the couplings. As applications of this theory, the constraints of the conformal symmetry on the form of the effective action and on the scattering amplitudes are shown. We also remark about the preservation of the unitarity bound for scattering. Finally, the old model of conformal supergravity by Fradkin and Tseytlin is briefly presented. Keywords: quantum gravity; conformal gravity; quantum field theory; non-local gravity; super- renormalizable gravity; UV-finite gravity; conformal anomaly; scattering amplitudes; conformal symmetry; conformal supergravity 1. Introduction From the beginning of research on theories enjoying invariance under local spacetime-dependent transformations, conformal symmetry played a pivotal role—first introduced by Weyl related changes of meters to measure distances (and also due to relativity changes of periods of clocks to measure time intervals).
    [Show full text]
  • Conformal Theory of Everything (CTOE)
    Conformal theory of everything F. F. Faria ∗ Centro de Ciˆencias da Natureza, Universidade Estadual do Piau´ı, 64002-150 Teresina, PI, Brazil Abstract By using conformal symmetry we unify the standard model of par- ticle physics with gravity in a consistent quantum field theory which describes all the fundamental particles and forces of nature. arXiv:1903.04893v3 [hep-ph] 26 Feb 2020 PACS numbers: 104.60.-m, 98.80.-k, 04.50.+h * [email protected] 1 Introduction It is well know that the standard model (SM) of particle physics is consistent with the experiments performed so far on particle accelerators such as the large hadron collider (LHC). However, the theory presents some problems such as the hierarchy and the Landau pole problems. Several modifications of the SM at scales between the electroweak and Planck scales, such as GUT [1, 2, 3, 4] or SUSY [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13], have been proposed to solve such problems. However, it is likely that there is no new physics beyond the SM all the way up to the Planck scale [14]. This leads us to suppose that the SM is a low energy limit of a fundamental theory defined at the Planck scale. Since gravitational effects are expected to be important around the Planck scale, it is natural to conjecture that this fundamental theory includes quantum gravity. One of the most straightforward ways to extend and unify physical the- ories is to change the symmetry of their actions. A strong candidate to be incorporated in the unification of the SM with gravity is the (local) conformal symmetry, which performs a multiplicative rescaling of all fields according to Φ=Ω(˜ x)−∆Φ Φ, (1) where Ω(x) is an arbitrary function of the spacetime coordinates, and ∆Φ is the scaling dimension of the field Φ, whose values are 2 for the metric field, 0 for gauge bosons, 1 for scalar fields, and 3/2 for fermions.− The consideration of the conformal symmetry as one of the fundamen- tal symmetries of physics is justified for several reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Baryon Resonances and Pentaquarks on the Lattice ✩
    Nuclear Physics A 754 (2005) 248c–260c Baryon resonances and pentaquarks on the lattice ✩ F.X. Lee a,b,∗, C. Bennhold a a Center for Nuclear Studies, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA b Jefferson Lab, 12000 Jefferson Avenue, Newport News, VA 23606, USA Received 17 December 2004; accepted 22 December 2004 Available online 21 January 2005 Abstract We review recent progress in computing excited baryons and pentaquarks in lattice QCD. 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. QCD primer Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) is widely accepted as the fundamental theory of the strong interaction. The QCD Lagrangian density can be written down simply in one line (in Euclidean space) 1 L = Tr F F µν +¯q γ µD + m q, (1) QCD 2 µν µ q where Fµν = ∂Aµ − ∂Aν + g[Aµ,Aν] is the gluon field strength tensor and Dµ = ∂µ + gAµ is the covariant derivative which provides the interaction between the gluon and quark terms. The action of QCD is the integral of the Lagrangian density over space– 4 time: SQCD = LQCD d x. QCD is a highly non-linear relativistic quantum field theory. It is well known that the theory has chiral symmetry in the mq = 0 limit and the symmetry is spontaneously broken in the vacuum. At high energies, it exhibits asymptotic freedom, ✩ Based on plenary talk by F.X. Lee at HYP2003, JLab. * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (F.X. Lee). 0375-9474/$ – see front matter 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.12.072 F.X.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Years of the Weyl Anomaly
    CTP-TAMU-06/93 Twenty Years of the Weyl Anomaly † M. J. Duff ‡ Center for Theoretical Physics Physics Department Texas A & M University College Station, Texas 77843 ABSTRACT In 1973 two Salam prot´eg´es (Derek Capper and the author) discovered that the conformal invariance under Weyl rescalings of the metric tensor 2 gµν(x) Ω (x)gµν (x) displayed by classical massless field systems in interac- tion with→ gravity no longer survives in the quantum theory. Since then these Weyl anomalies have found a variety of applications in black hole physics, cosmology, string theory and statistical mechanics. We give a nostalgic re- view. arXiv:hep-th/9308075v1 16 Aug 1993 CTP/TAMU-06/93 July 1993 †Talk given at the Salamfest, ICTP, Trieste, March 1993. ‡ Research supported in part by NSF Grant PHY-9106593. When all else fails, you can always tell the truth. Abdus Salam 1 Trieste and Oxford Twenty years ago, Derek Capper and I had embarked on our very first post- docs here in Trieste. We were two Salam students fresh from Imperial College filled with ideas about quantizing the gravitational field: a subject which at the time was pursued only by mad dogs and Englishmen. (My thesis title: Problems in the Classical and Quantum Theories of Gravitation was greeted with hoots of derision when I announced it at the Cargese Summer School en route to Trieste. The work originated with a bet between Abdus Salam and Hermann Bondi about whether you could generate the Schwarzschild solution using Feynman diagrams. You can (and I did) but I never found out if Bondi ever paid up.) Inspired by Salam, Capper and I decided to use the recently discovered dimensional regularization1 to calculate corrections to the graviton propaga- tor from closed loops of massless particles: vectors [1] and spinors [2], the former in collaboration with Leopold Halpern.
    [Show full text]
  • Entanglement, Conformal Field Theory, and Interfaces
    Entanglement, Conformal Field Theory, and Interfaces Enrico Brehm • LMU Munich • [email protected] with Ilka Brunner, Daniel Jaud, Cornelius Schmidt Colinet Entanglement Entanglement non-local “spooky action at a distance” purely quantum phenomenon can reveal new (non-local) aspects of quantum theories Entanglement non-local “spooky action at a distance” purely quantum phenomenon can reveal new (non-local) aspects of quantum theories quantum computing Entanglement non-local “spooky action at a distance” purely quantum phenomenon monotonicity theorems Casini, Huerta 2006 AdS/CFT Ryu, Takayanagi 2006 can reveal new (non-local) aspects of quantum theories quantum computing BH physics Entanglement non-local “spooky action at a distance” purely quantum phenomenon monotonicity theorems Casini, Huerta 2006 AdS/CFT Ryu, Takayanagi 2006 can reveal new (non-local) aspects of quantum theories quantum computing BH physics observable in experiment (and numerics) Entanglement non-local “spooky action at a distance” depends on the base and is not conserved purely quantum phenomenon Measure of Entanglement separable state fully entangled state, e.g. Bell state Measure of Entanglement separable state fully entangled state, e.g. Bell state Measure of Entanglement fully entangled state, separable state How to “order” these states? e.g. Bell state Measure of Entanglement fully entangled state, separable state How to “order” these states? e.g. Bell state ● distillable entanglement ● entanglement cost ● squashed entanglement ● negativity ● logarithmic negativity ● robustness Measure of Entanglement fully entangled state, separable state How to “order” these states? e.g. Bell state entanglement entropy Entanglement Entropy B A Entanglement Entropy B A Replica trick... Conformal Field Theory string theory phase transitions Conformal Field Theory fixed points in RG QFT invariant under holomorphic functions, conformal transformation Witt algebra in 2 dim.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghost-Free Scalar-Fermion Interactions
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 98, 044043 (2018) Ghost-free scalar-fermion interactions † ‡ Rampei Kimura,1,2,* Yuki Sakakihara,3, and Masahide Yamaguchi2, 1Waseda Institute for Advanced Study, Waseda University, 1-6-1 Nishi-Waseda, Shinjuku, Tokyo 169-8050, Japan 2Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan 3Department of Physics, Kwansei Gakuin University, Sanda, Hyogo 669-1337, Japan (Received 15 June 2018; published 28 August 2018) We discuss a covariant extension of interactions between scalar fields and fermions in a flat space-time. We show, in a covariant theory, how to evade fermionic ghosts appearing because of the extra degrees of freedom behind a fermionic nature even in the Lagrangian with first derivatives. We will give a concrete example of a quadratic theory with up to the first derivative of multiple scalar fields and a Weyl fermion. We examine not only the maximally degenerate condition, which makes the number of degrees of freedom correct, but also a supplementary condition guaranteeing that the time evolution takes place properly. We also show that proposed derivative interaction terms between scalar fields and a Weyl fermion cannot be removed by field redefinitions. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.044043 I. INTRODUCTION scalar-tensor theories [4–6,13–20], vector-tensor theories [21–29], and form fields [30–32]. Construction of general theory without ghost degrees of On the other hand, generic theory with fermionic d.o.f. freedom (d.o.f.) has been discussed for a long time. has not yet been investigated well. If we could find such According to Ostrogradsky’s theorem, a ghost always appears in a higher (time) derivative theory as long as it fermionic theories which have not been explored, some is nondegenerate [1] (see also Ref.
    [Show full text]
  • 8.821 String Theory Fall 2008
    MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 8.821 String Theory Fall 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 8.821 F2008 Lecture 11: CFT continued; geometry of AdS Lecturer: McGreevy October 17, 2008 In this session, we are going to talk about the following topics. 1. We are making a few comments about CFT. 2. We are discussing spheres and hyperboloids. 3. Finally we are focusing on Lorentzian AdS and its boundary. 1 Conformal Symmetry 1.1 Weyl anomaly Quantumly, conformal symmetry in a curved space (with even number of dimensions) could be anomalous, that is ds2 → Ω(x)ds2 could be no longer a symmetry of the full quantum theory. This µ anomaly can be evaluated from the following diagram with operator Tµ inserted at the left vertex. Figure 1: A contribution to the Weyl anomaly. The conformal anomaly signals a nonzero value for the trace of the energy-momentum tensor. In a curved spacetime, it is related to the curvature: µ D/2 Tµ ∼ R 1 where R denotes some scalar contractions of curvature tensors and D is the number of spacetime dimensions; the power is determined by dimensional analysis. For the special case of D = 2, this is c T µ = − R(2) (1) µ 12 where R(2) is the Ricci scalar in two dimensions and c is the central charge of the Virasoro algebra µ of the 2d CFT. Also in D = 4, the anomaly is given by Tµ = aW + cGB where W and B are defined as 1 W = (Weyl tensor)2 = R....R − 2R..R + R2 (2) ...
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Conformal Field Theory and String
    SLAC-PUB-5149 December 1989 m INTRODUCTION TO CONFORMAL FIELD THEORY AND STRING THEORY* Lance J. Dixon Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University Stanford, CA 94309 ABSTRACT I give an elementary introduction to conformal field theory and its applications to string theory. I. INTRODUCTION: These lectures are meant to provide a brief introduction to conformal field -theory (CFT) and string theory for those with no prior exposure to the subjects. There are many excellent reviews already available (or almost available), and most of these go in to much more detail than I will be able to here. Those reviews con- centrating on the CFT side of the subject include refs. 1,2,3,4; those emphasizing string theory include refs. 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 I will start with a little pre-history of string theory to help motivate the sub- ject. In the 1960’s it was noticed that certain properties of the hadronic spectrum - squared masses for resonances that rose linearly with the angular momentum - resembled the excitations of a massless, relativistic string.14 Such a string is char- *Work supported in by the Department of Energy, contract DE-AC03-76SF00515. Lectures presented at the Theoretical Advanced Study Institute In Elementary Particle Physics, Boulder, Colorado, June 4-30,1989 acterized by just one energy (or length) scale,* namely the square root of the string tension T, which is the energy per unit length of a static, stretched string. For strings to describe the strong interactions fi should be of order 1 GeV. Although strings provided a qualitative understanding of much hadronic physics (and are still useful today for describing hadronic spectra 15 and fragmentation16), some features were hard to reconcile.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ghost Particle 1 Ask Students If They Can Think of Some Things They Cannot Directly See but They Know Exist
    Original broadcast: February 21, 2006 BEFORE WATCHING The Ghost Particle 1 Ask students if they can think of some things they cannot directly see but they know exist. Have them provide examples and reasoning for PROGRAM OVERVIEW how they know these things exist. NOVA explores the 70–year struggle so (Some examples and evidence of their existence include: [bacteria and virus- far to understand the most elusive of all es—illnesses], [energy—heat from the elementary particles, the neutrino. sun], [magnetism—effect on a com- pass], and [gravity—objects falling The program: towards Earth].) How do scientists • relates how the neutrino first came to be theorized by physicist observe and measure things that cannot be seen with the naked eye? Wolfgang Pauli in 1930. (They use instruments such as • notes the challenge of studying a particle with no electric charge. microscopes and telescopes, and • describes the first experiment that confirmed the existence of the they look at how unseen things neutrino in 1956. affect other objects.) • recounts how scientists came to believe that neutrinos—which are 2 Review the structure of an atom, produced during radioactive decay—would also be involved in including protons, neutrons, and nuclear fusion, a process suspected as the fuel source for the sun. electrons. Ask students what they know about subatomic particles, • tells how theoretician John Bahcall and chemist Ray Davis began i.e., any of the various units of mat- studying neutrinos to better understand how stars shine—Bahcall ter below the size of an atom. To created the first mathematical model predicting the sun’s solar help students better understand the neutrino production and Davis designed an experiment to measure size of some subatomic particles, solar neutrinos.
    [Show full text]