Notes on the Program By James M. Keller, Program Annotator, The Leni and Peter May Chair

Symphony No. 2 in B minor lexander Borodin was born to a Russian time he was also busy at work on ; A prince and his mistress, and following some of the material in the seems the custom in such circumstances, he was of- to have begun in sketches for that . In ficially registered as the progeny of one of the the autumn of 1876, the Russian Musical So- prince’s serfs. Nonetheless, the prince saw to ciety showed interest in performing the new it that young Alexander received an excellent symphony, and Borodin was horrified to dis- education. Music and science especially ap- cover that his orchestral score of the first and pealed to him. After earning a doctor of med- last movements had gone missing. He had icine degree from the St. Petersburg Acad- to orchestrate them anew before the piece emy of Medicine and Surgery, he became a could finally be premiered, in March 1877. research chemist specializing in , The first performance fell midway on the organic compounds used as solvents, per- the spectrum between failure and success. fume ingredients, and components to pro- Rimsky-Korsakov wrote in his memoirs that duce such plastics as Bakelite and Formica. the work’s sound came into being “principal- His non-working hours were given over ly under the influence of our talks about or- to music — playing , con- chestration.” He expressed the opinion that ducting ensembles, and composing a small “at this point our enthusiasm ran away with but choice catalogue of works. In 1862 he us,” and that “the B-minor Symphony was fell into the circle of the Moguchaya kuch- ka, the “Mighty Handful,” along with , Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov, César In Short Cui, and Modest Musorgsky — a group also Born: November 12, 1833, in St. Petersburg, called the “Russian Five.” Many of Borodin’s masterworks reflect the group’s passionate Died: February 27, 1877, in St. Petersburg embrace of folk sources, most especially Work composed: principally April 1870–May his two (plus two fragmentary 1873, orchestrated 1875–76, revised in 1879; movements of a third), his “musical picture” dedicated to Ekaterina Borodina, the com- In Central Asia (often called In the Steppes of poser’s wife Central Asia in English-speaking lands), and his opera Prince Igor (left incomplete at his World premiere: March 10, 1877, in St. Peters- burg, by the Russian Musical Society, Eduard death). Through a quirk of fate, he died an Nápravník, conductor apparent peasant, just as he had ostensibly been born one; he dropped dead of an aortic New York Philharmonic premiere: aneurysm while dressed as a Russian peas- February 5, 1897, Anton Seidl, conductor ant at a Carnival costume party at the Academy Most recent New York Philharmonic of Medicine and Surgery. performance: February 12, 1999, at the Pru- Borodin may have begun writing his Sec- dential Center in Newark, New Jersey, Valery ond Symphony in 1869 and concentrated on Gergiev, conductor it from 1870 through 1873. During part of that Estimated duration: ca. 28 minutes

NOVEMBER 2019 | 25 orchestrated too heavily, and the role of the The critic , cheerleader brass was too prominent.” In the first perfor- for the Russian Five, said that Borodin had mance, “the whole heaviness of this method a program in mind for this symphony. The of instrumentation was brought out.” Fol- first movement would be a gathering of Rus- lowing the premiere, Borodin thinned out sian warriors; the third, a bayan, or myth- his scoring — particularly the brass parts ic bard; and the fourth, a “scene of heroes — and the work was re-introduced in 1879, feasting to the sound of the gusli [a folk in- conducted by Rimsky-Korsakov. strument of the zither family] amid the ex- Rimsky-Korsakov re-entered the saga of ultation of a great host of people.” (He gave this symphony eight years later. Borodin no indication about the second movement.) had been preparing the orchestral score for The work became known as the Bogatyrska- publication when he died. Rimsky-Korsakov ya (Heroic) Symphony, a nickname that has and fellow composer by now slipped away. took over the final editing and proofreading. Because Rimsky-Korsakov created posthu- Instrumentation: two flutes and picco- mous adaptations of other composers’ works lo, two oboes (one doubling English horn), — or, in the case of Prince Igor, filled in ex- two clarinets, two bassoons, four horns, two panses Borodin left empty — it was assumed trumpets, three trombones, tuba, timpani, that his editing of the Second Symphony was drum, cymbals, triangle, tambourine, extensive. On the contrary, recent investiga- harp, and strings. tions have shown that his alterations were very slight, and that they almost entirely fol- An earlier version of this note appeared in low emendations that Borodin had already programs of the and marked in his working manuscript. it is used with permission. © James M. Keller

Listen for . . . a Famous Motif

Borodin’s Second Symphony begins with a powerful outburst from the strings, a memorable motto that infuses the first movement:

This theme served as the secret signal for members of Les Apaches, a group of Parisian creative types whose membership included the young , a great Borodin fan; they would whis- tle the motif to each other as a greeting in the street. In reviewing an 1885 performance, Borodin’s colleague César Cui, wrote:

Right from the start, the first unison phrase startles the listener with its originality and strength. The latter quality increases and reaches its upper limit after the middle section, at the re- turn of the same phrase augmented twofold, halting on bleak, energy-filled chords. … In the first movement an atmosphere of grandeur is predominant, whereas humor prevails in the last movement. The first movement is like an everyday picture of some solemn ritual; the last move- ment is a vivid, motley, varied celebration of sparkling gaiety.

26 | NEW YORK PHILHARMONIC