Arxiv:2004.13108V2 [Math.NT] 29 Apr 2020 N“Nta Ht Aabitfo H Edo Oui,[O1a Corollary 5.0.1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PROBABILISTIC SZPIRO, BABY SZPIRO, AND EXPLICIT SZPIRO FROM MOCHIZUKI’S COROLLARY 3.12 TAYLOR DUPUY AND ANTON HILADO Abstract. In [DH20b] we gave some explicit formulas for the “indeterminacies” ind1, ind2, ind3 in Mochizuki’s Inequality as well as a new presentation of initial theta data. In the present paper we use these explicit formulas, together with our probabilistic formulation of [Moc15a, Corollary 3.12] to derive variants of Szpiro’s inequality (in the spirit of [Moc15b]). In par- ticular, for an elliptic curve in initial theta data we show how to derive uniform Szpiro (with explicit numerical constants). The inequalities we get will be strictly weaker than [Moc15b, Theorem 1.10] but the proofs are more transparent, modifiable, and user friendly. All of these inequalities are derived from an probabilistic version of [Moc15a, Corollary 3.12] formulated in [DH20b] based on the notion of random measurable sets. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Explicit Computations in Tensor Packets 5 3. Conductors, Minimal Discriminants, and Ramification 10 4. Estimates on p-adic Logarithms 16 5. Archimedean Logarithms 18 6. Upper Bounds on Hulls 18 7. Probabilistic Versions of the Mochizuki and Szpiro Inequalities 22 8. Deriving Explicit Constants For Szpiro’s Inequality From Mochizuki’s Inequality 29 References 35 1. Introduction arXiv:2004.13108v2 [math.NT] 29 Apr 2020 In [DH20b] we gave a probabilistic interpretation of Mochizuki’s Inequality (Corollary 3.12 of [Moc15a]). In the present paper we perform some explicit computations using this inequal- ity to derive three inequalities which we will call “Probabilistic Szpiro”, “Baby Szpiro”, and “Explicit Szpiro”. All of these inequalities depend on hypothesis of an elliptic curve being in “initial theta data built from the field of moduli”, [Moc15a, Corollary 3.12], and some assumed behavior at the archimedean place stated in Claim 5.0.1. In order to state our results we need to talk about initial theta data. As formulated in 5 § of [DH20b], initial theta data is a tuple bad (F/F,EF ,l,M,V ,Vmod, ǫ) Date: April 30, 2020. 1 surrounding an elliptic curve E = EF over a field F satisfying various conditions which are not important for the purposes of the introduction (the curious reader should consult [DH20b, 5]). What is important are the data types of the tuple: the entry l is a fixed prime § and, in the present paper, the choices of M, and ǫ will be irrelevant. We will discuss the sets bad of places V and Vmod momentarily. This requires some set up. bad In order to define the sets of places Vmod and V we need to introduce the fields F0 and K to which they belong. The field F0 is the field of Moduli of the elliptic curve defined by F0 := Q(jE ), in Mochizuki’s notation this is Fmod. The field K is the l-division field of F given by K := F (E[l]), (1.1) obtained by adjoining the l-torsion of E(F ) to F . In this paper, for any field L we will let V (L) denote the collection of places of L and for any non-archimedean place v V (L) we ∈ will let κ(v) denote the residue field and Lv denote the completion of L at v. We now come to the definitions of V bad and V . First V bad V (F ) is a non-empty set of mod mod ⊂ 0 bad multiplicative places over the field of moduli: for every E0 an elliptic curve over F0 such that E = E F , if v V bad, then E has multiplicative reduction at v. Next, the set ∼ 0 ⊗F0 ∈ mod 0 V V (K) is a set that maps bijectively to V (F ) under the natural map V (K) V (F ). ⊂ 0 → 0 We will be using these quantities momentarily but first we need to describe a special type of initial theta data that will be used in the course of this manuscript. For computational purposes one can always take an elliptic curve over its field of moduli (satisfying some mild conditions) and base change this field to a larger field to obtain some curve that can be put in initial theta data. We call such theta data “built from the field of moduli”. The precise definition is below. Definition 1.0.1. Let E/F be an elliptic curve inside initial theta data bad (F/F,EF ,l,M,V ,Vmod, ǫ). We will say that such a tuple is built from the field of moduli provided E = E F where 0 ⊗F0 F = Q(j ) is the field of moduli of E, E is a model of E over F , F := F (√ 1, E [30]), 0 E 0 0 0 − 0 and V bad V (F ) is the full set of places of multiplicative reduction.1 mod ⊂ 0 We will often use the notation d0 := [F0 : Q]. The constants in our Szpiro-like inequalities will depend on this degree. In stating our results we recall from [DH20b] that for a rational prime p that V (F0)p is given the structure of a probability space where Pr : V (F ) [0, 1] is defined by 0 p → [F : Q ] Pr(v) := 0,v p . [F0 : Qp] 1The definition of initial theta data in 5 of [DH20b] precludes bad places from having residue characteristic § two. Also the set of bad places needs to be nonempty. 2 Using V one can define some interesting probabilistic quantities which appear in our Prob- abilistic Szpiro inequality and give a good sense of the types of things that Mochizuki’s inequality “knows about”. Definition 1.0.2. (1) The probability that v V is unramified is ∈ p Punr,p = Pr(w). (1.2) w∈{v∈V (FX0)p:e(v/p)=1} (2) The average ramification degree of v V is defined to be ∈ p ep = E(e(v/p)). (1.3) (3) The average different of V /Q is defined to be Diff(V /Q)= pdiffp . (1.4) p Y diff(v/p) In (1.4) we have diffp = logp(E(p )) and diff(v/p) = ordp(Diff(Kv/Qp)); Diff(Kv/Qp) is the different of Kv over Qp. Using these quantities we can now state the Probabilistic Szpiro. Theorem 1.0.3 (Probabilistic Szpiro). Assume [Moc15a, Corollary 3.12] and Claim 5.0.1. bad For any elliptic curve E/F in initial theta data (F/F,EF ,l,M,V ,Vmod, ǫ) built from the field of moduli we have 1 ln ∆min | E/F | ln Diff(V /Q)+ ln(e )+ A (1.5) 6+ ε [F : Q] ≤ p l,V l p X where 5 A = ln(π)+ (1 Pl+1/2) ln(b )+ , l,V − unr,p p l +4 p X and b =1/ exp(1) ln(p), and ε = 24(l + 3)/(l2 + l 12). p l − From the Probabilistic Szpiro Inequality we can derive a “Baby Szpiro” Inequality. This inequality only depends on discriminant and degree of the division field K. This inequality can be derived quickly dispensing with a discussion of ramification of the mod l Galois representation and its relation to the conductor (which is reviewed in 3). In what follows § for an ideal I in a ring of integers R we let I denote the absolute norm. | | Theorem 1.0.4 (Baby Szpiro). Assume [Moc15a, Corollary 3.12] and Claim 5.0.1. Then bad for any elliptic curve E/F in initial theta data (F/F,EF ,l,M,V ,Vmod, ǫ) built from the field of moduli we have 1 ln ∆min | E/F | ln([K : Q]5/4) ln( Disc(K/Q) 5/4) + ln(π). (1.6) 6+ εl [F : Q] ≤ | | 2 In the above formula εl = (24l + 72)/(l + l 12) and K = Q(jE , E[30l], √ 1). −3 − In 8 we are more careful with our field invariants and delicately apply the theory of § [ST68]. The result of this delicate work is our “Explicit Szpiro”. Theorem 1.0.5 (Explicit Szpiro). Assume [Moc15a, Corollary 3.12] and Claim 5.0.1. If bad E/F is an elliptic curve in initial theta data (F/F,EF ,l,M,V ,Vmod, ǫ) built from the field of moduli then min A d2l4+B d 24+ε ∆ e 0 0 0 0 ( Cond(E/F ) Disc(F/Q) ) l , (1.7) | E/F | ≤ | |·| | where A0 = 84372107405, B0 = 316495, ε = 96(l + 3) /(l2 + l 12). l − All of these computations follow the same pattern. First, one computes an upper bound for the so-called hull of the multiradial representation (c.f. [DH20b, 4]) then one tries to § be as clever as possible in order to obtain futher bounds on the radiuses of these bounding polydiscs. The initial bounding is performed in 6 and the secondary bounds come in sub- § sequent sections. All of the material before 7 is built for this imminent application. A lot § of interesting Mathematics comes into play at both stages of these computations and inter- estingly, as our treatment will show, it seems that there is a lot of room for improvement. We have put in a great deal of effort in an attempt to highlight some of these avenues for improvement which we hope readers will take an interest in (see for example Remark 6.2.1). Acknowledgements. This article is very much indebted to many previous expositions of IUT including (but not limited to) [Fes15, Hos18, Ked15, Hos15, Sti15, Mok15, Moc17, Yam17, Hos17, Tan18, SS17]. The first author also greatly benefitted from conversations with many other mathematicians and would especially like to thank Yuichiro Hoshi for help- ful discussions regarding Kummer theory and his patience during discussions of the theta link and Mochizuki’s comparison; Kirti Joshi for discussions on deformation theory in the context of IUT; Kiran Kedlaya for productive discussions on Frobenioids, tempered funda- mental groups, and global aspects of IUT; Emmanuel Lepage for helpful discussions on the p-adic logarithm, initial theta data, aut holomorphic spaces, the log-kummer correspondence, theta functions and their functional equations, tempered fundamental groups, log-structures, cyclotomic synchronization, reconstruction of fundamental groups, reconstruction of decom- position groups, the ”multiradial representation of the theta pilot object”, the third indeter- minacy, the second indeterminacy, discussions on Hodge Theaters, labels, and kappa coric functions, and discussions on local class field theory; Shinichi Mochizuki for his patience in clarifying many aspects of his theory — these include discussions regarding the relation- ship between IUT and Hodge Arakelov theory especially the role of ”global multiplicative subspaces” in IUT, discussions on technical hypotheses in initial theta data; discussions on Theorem 3.11 and ”(abc)-modules”, discussions on mono-theta environments and the inte- rior and exterior cyclotomes, discussions of the behavior of various objects with respect to 4 automorphisms and providing comments on treatment of log-links and the use of polyiso- morphisms, discussions on indeterminacies and the multiradial representation, discussions of the theta link, discussions on various incarnations of Arakelov Divisors, discussions on cyclotomic synchronization; Chung Pang Mok for productive discussions on the p-adic log- arithm, anabelian evaluation, indeterminacies, the theta link, and hodge theaters; Thomas Scanlon for discussions regarding interpretations and infinitary logic as applied to IUT and anabelian geometry.