DOCSLIB.ORG

Morphometric Analyses of Embryonic Mouse Limbs Deficient In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Morphometric Analyses of Embryonic Mouse Limbs Deficient In MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSES OF EMBRYONIC MOUSE LIMBS DEFICIENT IN ECTODERMAL SMAD4 SIGNALING A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree in Master of Science By Kimberly Novak May 2012 Thesis written by Kimberly Novak Bachelor of Biology, Kent State University, 2010 M.S., Kent State University, 2012 Approved by ________________________ Dr. Y. Chen, Advisor ________________________James L. Blank, Chair, Department of Biological Sciences ________________________Dr. J. Stalvey, Dean, College of Arts and Science ii Table of Contents Table of Figures ...................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables...........................................................................................................................vii Abbreviations Used .............................................................................................................viii Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................x Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 1 Limb Development Background...................................................................................................1 The Apical Ectodermal Ridge, Proximal/Distal Patterning, and FGF8............................4 The Zone of Polarizing Activity, Anterior/Posterior patterning, and SHH....................6 Dorsal/Ventral Patterning, En1, Wnt7a, and the AER ..........................................................7 Bone Formation in Limbs ...............................................................................................................8 Smad4 and the TGF-β Signaling Pathway..................................................................................9 Materials and Methods........................................................................................................12 Mice.....................................................................................................................................................12 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................12 Genotyping........................................................................................................................................12 Materials...........................................................................................................................................................12 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................13 Alcian Blue and Alizarin Red staining of the adult mouse skeleton..............................13 Materials...........................................................................................................................................................13 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................13 iii Alcian Blue staining of mouse embryos..................................................................................14 Materials...........................................................................................................................................................14 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................14 Alcian blue and alizarin red staining of P1 mice .................................................................15 Materials...........................................................................................................................................................15 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................15 Beta-galactosidase staining of mouse embryos...................................................................16 Materials...........................................................................................................................................................16 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................16 Image Acquisition...........................................................................................................................17 Materials...........................................................................................................................................................17 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................17 Morphometric analyses of mouse embryo limb buds........................................................17 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................17 Morphometric analyses of mouse embryo skeletal elements and limb buds ...........18 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................18 Statistics ............................................................................................................................................18 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................18 Histology............................................................................................................................................19 Materials...........................................................................................................................................................19 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................19 Results.......................................................................................................................................20 Removing Smad4 from the Ectoderm results in a Range of Limb Defects ..................20 iv Characterization of Forelimb Defects in Ectodermal Smad4 Mutants .........................23 The Hindlimb Phenotype is Comparatively Milder in Mutants ......................................28 The Shape of Mutant Limb Buds is Altered throughout Development.........................29 Discussion................................................................................................................................35 Limb Patterning Defects are associated with a Range of Molecular Interactions....35 Early Shape Changes Reflect Later Phenotypes ...................................................................41 Clinical Relevance for Findings..................................................................................................42 Conclusion and Future Directions of Study ...........................................................................43 References ...............................................................................................................................46 v Table of Figures Figure 1: Basic limb structures........................................................................................ 2 Figure 2: Anatomy and signaling centers of the limb bud viewed from the dorsal or ventral surface........................................................................................................... 3 Figure 3: Generation of mutant and wild type embryos. ............................................ 11 Figure 4: Mosaic expression of Cyp19cre..................................................................... 21 Figure 5: Loss of ectodermal Smad4 results in a high percentage of skeletal element loss and posteriorly biased phenotype................................................................... 23 Figure 6: Autopod and zuegopod defects in mutant forelimbs................................... 24 Figure 7: Digit tips in mutants are flatter and broader............................................... 25 Figure 8: Limb element measurement comparisons.................................................... 26 Figure 9: D/V patterning is unaffected in mutant limbs. ............................................ 27 Figure 10: Hindlimb phenotype exhibiting syndactyly and ectopic nails.................. 28 Figure 11: Generation of reporter cross and reporter embryos................................. 30 Figure 12: Early mutant limb shape change. ............................................................... 32 Figure 13: Limb shape change across stages of development..................................... 33 Figure 14: Signaling pathways in the developing limb bud. ....................................... 40 vi List of Tables Table 1: The mutant phenotype is both penetrant and varied. .................................. 22 vii Abbreviations Used A/P – anterior/posterior AER – apical ectodermal ridge BMP – bone
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wnt Signalling During Limb Development
    Int. J. Dev. Biol. 46: 927-936 (2002) Wnt signalling during limb development VICKI L. CHURCH and PHILIPPA FRANCIS-WEST* Department of Craniofacial Development, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK ABSTRACT Wnts control a number of processes during limb development - from initiating outgrowth and controlling patterning, to regulating cell differentiation in a number of tissues. Interactions of Wnt signalling pathway components with those of other signalling pathways have revealed new mechanisms of modulating Wnt signalling, which may explain how different responses to Wnt signalling are elicited in different cells. Given the number of Wnts that are expressed in the limb and their ability to induce differential responses, the challenge will be to dissect precisely how Wnt signalling is regulated and how it controls limb development at a cellular level, together with the other signalling pathways, to produce the functional limb capable of co- ordinated precise movements. KEY WORDS: Wnt, limb, development, chondrogenesis, myogenesis The Wnt Gene Family is found in the others (Cadigan and Nusse, 1997). The frizzled receptors can function together with the LRP co-receptors, which The Wnt family of secreted glycosylated factors consists of 22 are single transmembrane proteins containing LDL receptor re- members in vertebrates which have a range of functions during peats, two frizzled motifs and four EGF type repeats in the development from patterning individual structures to fine tuning at extracellular domain (reviewed by Pandur and Kühl, 2001; also see a cellular level controlling cell differentiation, proliferation and Roszmusz et al., 2001). The LRPs, which include the vertebrate survival. The founding members of this family are the Drosophila genes LRP4, -5 and -6 and the Drosophila gene arrow, form a segment polarity gene Wingless (Wg), required for wing develop- complex with frizzled in a Wnt-dependent manner and signal in the ment, together with Wnt1 (originally named int-1) in the mouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Masking Techniques
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com SCI ENCE(C$ DIRECT Developmental Biology 273 (2004) 361-372 www.elsevier.com/locate/ydbio The roles of Fgf4 and Fgf8 in limb bud initiation and outgrowth Anne M. Bouleta, Anne M. Moonb,c, Benjamin R. Arenkiela, Mario R. Capecchi3’* ^Department of Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA bProgram in Human Molecular Biology and Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA cDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA Received for publication 12 May 2004, revised 16 June 2004, accepted 21 June 2004 Abstract Although numerous molecules required for limb bud formation have recently been identified, the molecular pathways that initiate this process and ensure that limb formation occurs at specific axial positions have yet to be fully elucidated. Based on experiments in the chick, Fg/8 expression in the intermediate mesoderm (IM) has been proposed to play a critical role in the initiation of limb bud outgrowth via restriction of Fgfl 0 expression to the appropriate region of the lateral plate mesoderm. Contrary to the outcome predicted by this model, ablation of Fgf8 expression in the intermediate mesoderm before limb bud initiation had no effect on initial limb bud outgrowth or on the formation of normal limbs. When their expression patterns were first elucidated, both Fgf4 and Fg/8 were proposed to mediate critical functions of the apical ectodermal ridge (AER), which is required for proper limb bud outgrowth.
    [Show full text]
  • A Valuable Stain for Connective Tissue, Keratin and Fungi* Michel Prunieras, M.D
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector PAB: A VALUABLE STAIN FOR CONNECTIVE TISSUE, KERATIN AND FUNGI* MICHEL PRUNIERAS, M.D. Since the papers by Steedman (1), Lison (2)tion. Most of the blocks were freshly prepared and Mowry (3), the use of Alcian Blue stain hasbut some were as old as 30 years. undergone considerable change. The PAB stain (routine) runs as follow: As pointed out by Pearse (4), staining with Alcian Blue is increased when acidic groups are Deparafflo and bring sections to water. introduced by sulfation or by oxidation, due Oxidize in Permanganate for 10 minutes (2.5% to the salt linkage of the dye with acidic groups.MnO4K: 100 cc.; 5% S04112: 100 cc.; distilled water: 700 cc.). The specificity of the stain might also be im- Bleach in 2% oxalic acid, 30 seconds. proved by lowering the pH of the staining bath, Wash in running water and rinse in distilled thus making Alcian Blue staining specific forwater. strong acidic groups, as shown by Adams and Stain ooe slide 30 minutes in 0.1% Alcian Blue Sloper (5). Different oxidative procedures,8GX (Imperial Chemical Industries) in 3% acetic followed by Alcian Blue stain at various pHacid (pH 2.7, 3.0) and one other slide 10 minutes have been already described in the literature:in 1% Alcian Blue in 10% sulphuric acid (pH 0.2, 0.4). A third slide might be stained 1 minute in performie acid (Adams and Sloper, 5), per-1% Alcian Blue in distilled water.
    [Show full text]
  • Mucin Histochemistry in Tumours of Colon, Ovaries and Lung
    ytology & f C H i o s l t a o n l o r g u y o Ali et al., J Cytol Histol 2012, 3:7 J Journal of Cytology & Histology DOI: 10.4172/2157-7099.1000163 ISSN: 2157-7099 ReviewResearch Article Article OpenOpen Access Access Mucin Histochemistry in Tumours of Colon, Ovaries and Lung Usman Ali*, Nagi AH, Nadia Naseem and Ehsan Ullah Department of Morbid Anatomy and Histopathology, University of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan Abstract Introduction: Mucins implicated in cancers of various organs. The apical epithelial surfaces of mammalian respiratory, gastrointestinal, and reproductive tracts are coated by mucus, a mixture of water, ions, glycoproteins, proteins, and lipids. The purpose of this study was to confirm the presence of mucin production using Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stain as the gold standard and to describe the types of mucins produced in tumors of lung, colon and ovaries using various types of histochemical techniques. Methods: The resection specimens and biopsies from tumours of colon (n=16), ovaries (n=13) and lung (n=5) were included and stained with H&E to determin the histological diagnosis for selecting tissues with mucin production. Slides were stained with PAS, Alcian blue, High iron diamine-Alcian blue, Meyer’s mucicarmine and Alcian blue-PAS to demonstrate the mucin production and to identify types of mucins. Results: In the present study we observed predominance of acid mucins over neutral mucins. In addition in these cases we observed sulphomucin predominating over sialomucin. Conclusion: Mucin histochemistry can effectively determine the types of mucins. Keywords: Haematoxylin and Eosin; Periodic acid schiff; High iron Materials and Methods diamine; Alcian blue Paraffin embedded sections were prepared using automatic tissue Introduction processor, followed by preparation of paraffin block using our embedding station.
    [Show full text]
  • Hox Genes Regulate the Onset of Tbx5 Expression in the Forelimb Carolina Minguillon1,*,‡, Satoko Nishimoto1, Sophie Wood2, Elisenda Vendrell1, Jeremy J
    3180 RESEARCH ARTICLE Development 139, 3180-3188 (2012) doi:10.1242/dev.084814 © 2012. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd Hox genes regulate the onset of Tbx5 expression in the forelimb Carolina Minguillon1,*,‡, Satoko Nishimoto1, Sophie Wood2, Elisenda Vendrell1, Jeremy J. Gibson-Brown3,§ and Malcolm P. O. Logan1,* SUMMARY Tbx4 and Tbx5 are two closely related T-box genes that encode transcription factors expressed in the prospective hindlimb and forelimb territories, respectively, of all jawed vertebrates. Despite their striking limb type-restricted expression pattern, we have shown that these genes do not participate in the acquisition of limb type-specific morphologies. Instead, Tbx4 and Tbx5 play similar roles in the initiation of hindlimb and forelimb outgrowth, respectively. We hypothesized that different combinations of Hox proteins expressed in different rostral and caudal domains of the lateral plate mesoderm, where limb induction occurs, might be involved in regulating the limb type-restricted expression of Tbx4 and Tbx5 and in the later determination of limb type-specific morphologies. Here, we identify the minimal regulatory element sufficient for the earliest forelimb-restricted expression of the mouse Tbx5 gene and show that this sequence is Hox responsive. Our results support a mechanism in which Hox genes act upstream of Tbx5 to control the axial position of forelimb formation. KEY WORDS: Tbx5, Hox, Limb development INTRODUCTION induce, and are markers of, forelimb and hindlimb outgrowth, T-box genes encode a family of transcription factors that have respectively, they do not play a role in the specification of limb been identified in all metazoans and which play diverse roles type-specific morphologies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Frog Embryo with No Apical Ectodermal Ridge (AER)
    J. Anat. (1998) 192, pp. 379–390, with 6 figures Printed in the United Kingdom 379 Limb development and evolution: a frog embryo with no apical ectodermal ridge (AER) MICHAEL K. RICHARDSON1, TIMOTHY F. CARL2, JAMES HANKEN2, RICHARD P. ELINSON3, CELIA COPE1 AND PETER BAGLEY1 " # Department of Anatomy, St George’s Hospital Medical School, London, UK, Department of Environmental, Population, $ and Organismic Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA, and Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Accepted 27 January 1998) The treefrog Eleutherodactylus coqui is a direct developer—it has no tadpole stage. The limb buds develop earlier than in metamorphosing species (indirect developers, such as Xenopus laevis). Previous molecular studies suggest that at least some mechanisms of limb development in E. coqui are similar to those of other vertebrates and we wished to see how limb morphogenesis in this species compares with that in other vertebrates. We found that the hind limb buds are larger and more advanced than the forelimbs at all stages examined, thus differing from the typical amniote pattern. The limb buds were also small compared to those in the chick. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy showed that although the apical ectoderm is thickened, there was no apical ectodermal ridge (AER). In addition, the limb buds lacked the dorsoventral flattening seen in many amniotes. These findings could suggest a mechanical function for the AER in maintaining dorsoventral flattening, although not all data are consistent with this view. Removal of distal ectoderm from E. coqui hindlimb buds does not stop outgrowth, although it does produce anterior defects in the skeletal pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • T-Box Genes in Limb Development and Disease
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs T-box Genes in Limb Development and Disease Thesis How to cite: Rallis, Charalampos (2004). T-box Genes in Limb Development and Disease. PhD thesis The Open University. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 2004 Charalampos Rallis Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21954/ou.ro.0000fa0b Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk T-box Genes in Limb Development and Disease Charalampos Rallis Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2004 Division of Developmental Biology National Institute for Medical Research Mill Hill London Open University ProQuest Number: C819643 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest C819643 Published by ProQuest LLO (2019). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLO. ProQuest LLO. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.Q.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Gene Network Structure and Expression Variation Among Individuals and Species
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Previously Published Works Title The Relationship between Gene Network Structure and Expression Variation among Individuals and Species. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/77v6f7dc Journal PLoS genetics, 11(8) ISSN 1553-7390 Authors Sears, Karen E Maier, Jennifer A Rivas-Astroza, Marcelo et al. Publication Date 2015-08-28 DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005398 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California RESEARCH ARTICLE The Relationship between Gene Network Structure and Expression Variation among Individuals and Species Karen E. Sears1,2*, Jennifer A. Maier1, Marcelo Rivas-Astroza3, Rachel Poe4, Sheng Zhong3, Kari Kosog1, Jonathan D. Marcot1, Richard R. Behringer5, Chris J. Cretekos6†, John J. Rasweiler, IV7, Zoi Rapti4 1 School of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America, 2 Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America, 3 Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America, 4 Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America, 5 Department of Genetics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America, 6 Department of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, United States of America, 7 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, United States of America † Deceased. * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Citation: Sears KE, Maier JA, Rivas-Astroza M, Poe R, Zhong S, Kosog K, et al. (2015) The Relationship between Gene Network Structure and Expression Abstract Variation among Individuals and Species.
    [Show full text]
  • Pitx2 Determines Left–Right Asymmetry of Internal Organs in Vertebrates 8
    articles Pitx2 determines left–right asymmetry of internal organs in vertebrates 8 Aimee K. Ryan*†, Bruce Blumberg†‡, Concepcio´ n Rodriguez-Esteban†‡, Sayuri Yonei-Tamura†‡, Koji Tamura‡, Tohru Tsukui‡, Jennifer de la Pen˜ a‡, Walid Sabbagh‡, Jason Greenwald‡, Senyon Choe‡, Dominic P. Norris§, Elizabeth J. Robertson§, Ronald M. Evans‡k, Michael G. Rosenfeld* & Juan Carlos Izpisu´ a Belmonte‡ * Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0648, USA § Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA k Howard Hughes Medical Institute, ‡ The Salk Institute, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, USA † These authors contributed equally to this work ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ The handedness of visceral organs is conserved among vertebrates and is regulated by asymmetric signals relayed by molecules such as Shh, Nodal and activin. The gene Pitx2 is expressed in the left lateral plate mesoderm and, subsequently, in the left heart and gut of mouse, chick and Xenopus embryos. Misexpression of Shh and Nodal induces Pitx2 expression, whereas inhibition of activin signalling blocks it. Misexpression of Pitx2 alters the relative position of organs and the direction of
    [Show full text]
  • Wnt/Lef1 Signaling Acts Via Pitx2 to Regulate Somite Myogenesis
    Developmental Biology 337 (2010) 211–219 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Developmental Biology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/developmentalbiology Wnt/Lef1 signaling acts via Pitx2 to regulate somite myogenesis Muhammad Abu-Elmagd a, Lesley Robson b, Dylan Sweetman a, Julia Hadley c, Philippa Francis-West c,⁎, Andrea Münsterberg a,⁎ a University of East Anglia, School of Biological Sciences, Norwich, NR4 7TJ Earlham Road, UK b Queen Mary University of London, Neuroscience, Barts and The London SMD, E1 2AD London, UK c Craniofacial Development, The Dental Institute, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 9RT, UK article info abstract Article history: Wnt signaling has been implicated in somite, limb, and branchial arch myogenesis but the mechanisms and Received for publication 23 February 2009 roles are not clear. We now show that Wnt signaling via Lef1 acts to regulate the number of premyogenic Revised 18 September 2009 cells in somites but does not regulate myogenic initiation in the limb bud or maintenance in the first or Accepted 14 October 2009 second branchial arch. We have also analysed the function and regulation of a putative downstream Available online 20 October 2009 transcriptional target of canonical Wnt signaling, Pitx2. We show that loss-of-function of Pitx2 decreases the Keywords: number of myogenic cells in the somite, whereas overexpression increases myocyte number particularly in Chicken embryo the epaxial region of the myotome. Increased numbers of mitotic cells were observed following Wnt signaling overexpression of Pitx2 or an activated form of Lef1, suggesting an effect on cell proliferation. In addition, Myogenesis we show that Pitx2 expression is regulated by canonical Wnt signaling in the epaxial somite and second Lef1 branchial arch, but not in the limb or the first branchial arch.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roles of Fgfs in the Early Development of Vertebrate Limbs
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 26, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW The roles of FGFs in the early development of vertebrate limbs Gail R. Martin1 Department of Anatomy and Program in Developmental Biology, School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143–0452 USA ‘‘Fibroblast growth factor’’ (FGF) was first identified 25 tion of two closely related proteins—acidic FGF and ba- years ago as a mitogenic activity in pituitary extracts sic FGF (now designated FGF1 and FGF2, respectively). (Armelin 1973; Gospodarowicz 1974). This modest ob- With the advent of gene isolation techniques it became servation subsequently led to the identification of a large apparent that the Fgf1 and Fgf2 genes are members of a family of proteins that affect cell proliferation, differen- large family, now known to be comprised of at least 17 tiation, survival, and motility (for review, see Basilico genes, Fgf1–Fgf17, in mammals (see Coulier et al. 1997; and Moscatelli 1992; Baird 1994). Recently, evidence has McWhirter et al. 1997; Hoshikawa et al. 1998; Miyake been accumulating that specific members of the FGF 1998). At least five of these genes are expressed in the family function as key intercellular signaling molecules developing limb (see Table 1). The proteins encoded by in embryogenesis (for review, see Goldfarb 1996). Indeed, the 17 different FGF genes range from 155 to 268 amino it may be no exaggeration to say that, in conjunction acid residues in length, and each contains a conserved with the members of a small number of other signaling ‘‘core’’ sequence of ∼120 amino acids that confers a com- molecule families [including WNT (Parr and McMahon mon tertiary structure and the ability to bind heparin or 1994), Hedgehog (HH) (Hammerschmidt et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterning Mechanisms Controlling Vertebrate Limb Development
    8 Sep 2001 13:46 AR AR139-4.tex AR139-4.SGM ARv2(2001/05/10) P1: GSR Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2001. 17:87–132 Copyright c 2001 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved PATTERNING MECHANISMS CONTROLLING VERTEBRATE LIMB DEVELOPMENT Javier Capdevila and Juan Carlos Izpisua´ Belmonte The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, Gene Expression Laboratory, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037; e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Key Words AER, BMP, FGF, Hedgehog, limb, morphogen, pattern formation, regeneration, secreted factors, vertebrate development, WNT, ZPA ■ Abstract Vertebrate limb buds are embryonic structures for which much molecu- lar and cellular data are known regarding the mechanisms that control pattern formation during development. Specialized regions of the developing limb bud, such as the zone of polarizing activity (ZPA), the apical ectodermal ridge (AER), and the non-ridge ectoderm, direct and coordinate the development of the limb bud along the anterior- posterior (AP), dorsal-ventral (DV), and proximal-distal (PD) axes, giving rise to a stereotyped pattern of elements well conserved among tetrapods. In recent years, spe- cific gene functions have been shown to mediate the organizing and patterning activities of the ZPA, the AER, and the non-ridge ectoderm. The analysis of these gene functions has revealed the existence of complex interactions between signaling pathways oper- ated by secreted factors of the HH, TGF-/BMP, WNT, and FGF superfamilies, which interact with many other genetic networks to control limb positioning, outgrowth, and patterning. The study of limb development has helped to establish paradigms for the analysis of pattern formation in many other embryonic structures and organs.
    [Show full text]