Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons
LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School
1989 The Affective Variant Hypothesis: How Is Bulimia Nervosa Related to Depression? Rita C. Prather Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses
Recommended Citation Prather, Rita C., "The Affective Variant Hypothesis: How Is Bulimia Nervosa Related to Depression?" (1989). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 4870. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/4870
This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS
The most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer.
The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.
Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order.
University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600
Order Number 9025S32
The affective variant hypothesis: How is bulimia nervosa related to depression?
Prather, Rita C., Ph.D.
The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical Col., 1989
UMI 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106
The Affective Variant Hypothesis: How is Bulimia Nervosa Related to Depression?
A Dissertation
Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
m
The Department of Psychology
by Rita C. Prather B.A.. University of Central Florida, 1983 M.A., Louisiana State University, 1985
December 1989 Acknowledgements
With infinite thanks I acknowledge my dissertation committee members, Donald A. Williamson, Ph.D., W.
Drew Gouvier, Ph.D., Mary Lou Kelly, Ph.D., Arthur J.
Riopelle, Ph.D., and William F. Waters, Ph.D. In addition to participation in this dissertation, each
Professor has influenced my professional career in several unique and positive ways.
Special acknowledgement and gratitude goes to Dr.
Williamson for serving as chairman of my dissertation committee. I thank him for the time and interest spent on my behalf.
I wish also to thank William G. Johnson, Ph.D.,
University of Mississippi Medical Center, for aiding in subject recruitment and reviewing this manuscript and making several important suggestions.
Mr. Jeff Baker was instrumental in the completion of this dissertation. He supervised much of the data collection which meant many hours of work and attention to troubleshooting and problem-solving. It is very difficult to communicate the depth of appreciation that goes to Mr. Baker.
This acknowledgement could not be complete without recognition of Robert E. Prather whose support and participation have always been freely given. His support has been absolutely invaluable throughout my personal and career development. Table of Contents
Acknowledgements...... ii-iii
List of Tables...... vi
List of Figures...... vii
Abstract...... viii-ix
Introduction...... 1-42
Bulimia and Bulimia Nervosa...... 1- 7
Major Depression and Dysthymia...... 7-10
Affective Variant Hypothesis...... 10-26
Comparison of Bulimia Nervosa
and Depression...... 26-27
Affective Variant Hypothesis:
Further Evaluation...... 27-40
Summary...... 40-42
Method...... 43-52
Research Participants...... 43-45
Assessment Instruments...... 46-51
Procedure...... 51-52
Resul ts...... 53-63
Discussion...... 64-79
References...... 80-103
Appendices...... 104-162
Appendix A: Demographic Questionnaire..105-107
iv. Appendix B: Diagnostic Interview
Bulimia Nervosa...... 108-113
Appendix C: The Bulimia Test...... 114-121
Appendix D: Schedule for Affective
Disorders...... 122-130
Appendix E: Beck Depression Inventory..131-133
Appendix F: Center for Epidemiological
Studies Depression Scale ... 134-136
Appendix G: Dysfunctional Attitude
Scale...... 137-141
Appendix H: Pleasant Events Schedule ... 142-150
Appendix I: Maudsley Obsessive-Compulsive
Inventory...... 151-153
Appendix J: State-Trait Anxiety
Inventory...... 154-156
Appendix K: Informed Consent Form...... 157-158
Appendix L: DSM-IIIR Diagnostic
Checkl ists...... 159-162
Bulimia Nervosa...... 160
Major Depression...... 161
Dysthymia...... 162
Vita...... 163-169
v. List of Tables
Table 1. Russell Diagnostic Criteria for
Bulimia Nervosa...... 3
Table 2. DSM-III Diagnostic Criteria for
Bulimia Nervosa...... 4
Table 3. DSM-IIIR Diagnostic Criteria for
Bulimia Nervosa...... 4
Table 4. DSM-IIIR Diagnostic Criteria for
Major Depression...... 8
Table 5, DSM-IIIR Diagnostic Criteria for
Dysthymia...... 11
Table 6. Beck's Cognitive Dysfunctions...... 30
Table 7. Group Demographics...... 45
Table 8. Tests of Bulimia, Depression,
and their Interaction ...... 55
Table 9. Summary of Combined Effects...... 57
Table 10. Correlational Analyses...... 59
Table 11 Stepwise Multiple Regression: BULIT...... 61
Table 12. Stepwise Multiple Regression: BDI...... 61
vi . List of Figures
Figure 1. Anxiety Model of Bulimia...... 35
vi i . Abstract
Bulimia nervosa patients frequently score from mild to severe on measures of depressive symptoms.
This association between bulimia nervosa and depression led some researchers to hypothesize that bulimia nervosa is a variant of the affective disorder of depression. The main purpose of this study was to provide further evaluation of the affective variant hypothesis of bulimia nervosa. It was postulated that bulimia nervosa patients with and without depression would differ from each other and from depressives without eating disorders on specific measures of cognitive, behavioral, and somatic symptoms associated with depression. Secondly, it was hypothesized that the nondepressed and depressed bulimic patients would differ from depressives but not from each other on measures of anxiety and obsessiveness which would lend support to the anxiety model of bulimia nervosa. The results did not support either the affective variant hypothesis or the anxiety model of bulimia nervosa.
The depressed bulimia nervosa patients evidenced higher levels of somatic symptoms, cognitive dysfunction, state anxiety, and obsessiveness than nondepressed bulimics. These two groups were similar in severity only in trait anxiety and anhedonia. The bulimic and nonbulimic depressed patients did not statistically differ on any measure when the bulimic was also clinically depressed. The dually diagnosed patients were more disturbed than either the nondepressed bulimics or the nonbulimic depressed patients. The nonbulimic depressed patients' scores were more severe than the normals' on four of the six significant measures (somatic symptoms, cognitive dysfunction, state anxiety, trait anxiety), the depressed bulimics' more severe on all six, and the nondepressed bulimics' more severe on only three measures (cognitive dysfunction, anhedonia, trait anxiety). While no measure was associated with bulimia nervosa, several measures were highly associated with depression. The Affective Variant Hypothesis: How is Bulimia
Nervosa Related to Depression?
Introduction
This dissertation presents an overview of bulimia nervosa and depression as well as a review of the research literature addressing the affective variant hypothesis of bulimia nervosa. The affective variant hypothesis explains bulimia nervosa as a variant of affective disorder and not distinct from the disorder of depression. An association between the two disorders has repeatedly been demonstrated, but the
nature of the relationship has been unclear. This
investigation was undertaken to identify variables
that would be useful in defining the relationship between bulimia nervosa and depression.
Bulimia and Bulimia Nervosa
Bulimia nervosa first emerged as a subclinical variant of anorexia nervosa and since then has carried various labels as well as different diagnostic criteria. The disorder has been known as dysorexia
(Guiora, 1967), bulimarexia (Boskind-Lodahl & White,
1978), subclinical anorexia (Crisp, Kalucy, Lacey, &
1 2
Harding, 1977), binge-purge syndrome (World Health
Organization, 1978), dietary chaos syndrome (Palmer,
1979), bulimia nervosa (Russell, 1979, 1983; American
Psychiatric Association, 1987), and bulimia (American
Psychiatric Association, 1980).
Since 1979, four sets of diagnostic criteria have been reported most frequently in the research literature. Russell's (1979, 1983) criteria have been utilized in Britain while the American Psychiatric
Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders (DSM-III, 1980; DSM-IIIR, 1987) criteria have been preferred in the United States.
These sets of diagnostic criteria are listed in
Tables 1 through 3.
Three major symptoms have .been found to comprise the bulimic syndrome (Fairburn & Garner, 1986). The primary feature of this eating disorder, regardless of the label, has been episodic, uncontrolled overeating.
A second clinical feature is engaging in one or more extreme behaviors designed to control body weight.
These weight control behaviors include self-induced vomiting, laxative or diuretic use, fasting or severe dieting, and excessive exercise. A third symptom. 3
Table 1. Russell's Diagnostic Criteria for Bulimia Nervosa
Bulimia nervosa-original criteria (Russell, 1979)
1. The patients suffer from powerful, intractable urges to overeat; 2. They seek to avoid the "fattening" effects of food by inducing vomiting or abusing purgatives; 3. They have a morbid fear of becoming fat.
Bulimia nervosa-revised criteria (Russell. 1983)
1. Preoccupations with food, irresistible cravings for food and repeated episodes of overeating; 2. Devices aimed at counteracting the "fattening" effects of food; 3. A psychopathology resembling that of classical anorexia nervosa; 4. A previous overt or cryptic episode of anorexia nervosa. 4
Table 2. DSM-III Diagnostic Criteria for Bulimia
A. Recurrent episodes of binge eating (rapid consumption of a large amount of food in a discrete period of time, usually less than two hours); B. At least three of the following; 1. consumption of high-caloric, easily ingested food during a binge 2. unconspicuous eating during a binge 3. termination of such eating episodes by abdominal pain, sleep, social interruption, or self-induced vomiting 4. repeated attempts to lose weight by severely restrictive diets, self-induced vomiting, or use of cathartics and/or diuretics C. Awareness that the eating pattern is abnormal and fear of not being able to stop eating voluntarily; D. Depressed mood and self-deprecating thoughts following eating binges,- E. The bulimics episodes are not due to anorexia nervosa or any known physical disorder.
American Psychiatric Association (1980)
Table 3. DSM-IIIR Diagnostic Criteria for Bulimia Nervosa
A. Recurrent episodes of binge eating (rapid consumption of a large amount of food in a discrete period of time); B. A feeling of lack of control over eating behavior during the eating binges; C. The person regularly engages in either self-induced vomiting, use of laxatives or diuretics, strict dieting or fasting, or vigorous exercise in order to prevent weight gain; D. A minimum average of two binge eating episodes a week for at least three months; E. Persistent overconcern with body shape and weight.
American Psychiatric Association (1987). 5
preoccupation with body size, has been found to be associated with bulimia nervosa (Fairburn & Garner,
1986). These three symptoms are included as diagnostic criteria for bulimia nervosa in the recent revision of DSM-III (DSM-IIIR. American Psychiatric
Association, 1987).
DSM-III (American Psychiatric Association, 1980) required both depressed mood and self-deprecating
thoughts following binge eating. The revision of
DSM-III (American Psychiatric Association, 1987) eliminated this criterion, however. The elimination of this symptom might be due to findings that the mood
immediately following binge eating is varied (cf.
Mizes, 1985), and when present, the depressive mood is often more pervasive and not limited to the period
following binging (Davis, Freeman, & Solyom, 1985;
Fairburn & Cooper, 1982; Herzog, 1982, 1984; Johnson &
Larson, 1982; Lee, Rush, & Mitchell, 1985; Mitchell,
Hatsukami, Eckert, & Pyle, 1985; Williamson, Prather,
Upton, Davis, Ruggiero, & VanBuren, 1987). Fairburn
and Garner (1986) suggested that the psychopathology associated with bulimia nervosa is less specific than 6
the three main symptoms of binge eating, purging, and preoccupation with body weight and shape. However, they report that anxiety and depression are the most commonly associated symptoms. Others have suggested that depression is not an associated feature of bulimia nervosa but is the central problem (Hudson,
Pope, Jonas, Laffer, Hudson, & Melby, 1983). This issue will be discussed in more detail in a subsequent section.
Bulimia is a relatively common disorder, with prevalence rates reported in the literature ranging from 1 to 16 percent (American Psychiatric
Association, 1980; Cooper & Fairburn, 1983; Johnson,
Lewis, Love, Stuckey, & Lewis, 1983; Mizes, 1985;
Pyle, Mitchell, Eckert, Halvorson, Neuman, & Goff,
1983). The large variability in estimates of prevalence is probably due to differences in the diagnostic criteria utilized and whether or not self
induced vomiting was required for a positive diagnosis of bulimia. Although DSM-IIIR criteria are more restrictive than DSM-III, vomiting is still not
essential for the diagnosis of bulimia nervosa. A patient may be diagnosed with bulimia nervosa if the 7
patient engages in either fasting, vigorous exercise, uses laxatives or diuretics, or self-induces vomiting
to prevent weight gain between binges. Results from
prevalence studies requiring the presence of self
induced vomiting suggested an incidence rate of
approximately 4 percent (Johnson, Lewis, Love,
Stuckey, & Lewis, 1983), while higher rates have been
reported in studies not requiring self-induced
vomiting.
Onset usually occurs between the ages of 15 to 18 years (Fairburn & Cooper, 1982; Pyle, Mitchell, &
Eckert, 1981), however age of onset may range from 13
to 30 years (Russell, 1979). Ninety-five percent of
those diagnosed with bulimia have been females.
Major Depression and Dysthymia
The diagnosis of major depression is indicated when a designated cluster of symptoms has been present
for a period of at least two weeks (American
Psychiatric Association, 1987). Refer to Table 4 for
complete DSM-IIIR diagnostic criteria. The symptom
cluster includes a relatively pervasive and prominent
dysphoric mood or decreased interest in usual 8
Table 4. DSM-IIIR Diagnostic Criteria for Major Depression
A. At least five of the following symptoms have been present during the same two-week period and represent a change from previous functioning; at least one of the symptoms is either (1) depressed mood, or (2) loss of interest or pleasure:
1. depressed mood most of the day, nearly every day; 2. markedly diminished interest or pleasure in all, or almost all, activities most of the days, nearly every day; 3. significant weight loss or gain when not dieting or decrease or increase in appetite nearly every day; 4. insomnia or hypersonmia nearly every day; 5. psychomotor agitation or retardation nearly every day; 6. fatigue or loss of energy nearly every day; 7. feelings of worthlessness or excessive or inappropriate guilt; 8. diminished ability to think or concentrate, or indecisiveness nearly every day; 9. recurrent thoughts of death, recurrent suicidal ideation without a specific plan, or a suicide attempt or specific plan for committing suicide
American Psychiatric Association (1987). 9
activities every day during the worst point of the depression. In addition, at least four of the
following eight symptoms must also be present to satisfy diagnostic criteria. These symptoms include
(a) appetite disturbance, (b) sleep disturbance, (c) psychomotor retardation or agitation, (d) a decrease
in sexual interest and/or interest in usual activities, (e) loss of energy or fatigue, (f)
feelings of worthlessness and/or excessive guilt, (g)
indecisiveness and concentration difficulties, and (h)
persistent suicidal ideation or attempts (DSM-IIIR,
American Psychiatric Association, 1987).
Prevalence rates indicate that approximately 18 to
23 percent of females have had a major depressive
episode at some time, and this rate is twice as high
as that for males (Boyd & Weissman, 1981) . Onset can
occur at any age, and occurrence is relatively evenly
distributed across adult age groups (American
Psychiatric Association, 1980).
Dysthymia is similar to major depression with
symptoms differing only in duration and severity
(American Psychiatric Association, 1987). The DSM-
IIIR diagnostic criteria for dysthymia are listed in 10
Table 5. Dysthymia is essentially a chronic disturbance of mood, and impairment in social and occupational functioning is usually mild to moderate.
As in major depression, dysthymia is a common disorder and is identified more frequently in adult females.
Onset generally occurs before or during early adult
1 ife.
Affective variant hypothesis
As discussed earlier, bulimia nervosa is
frequently accompanied by depressive symptoms which
are pervasive and sometimes severe (cf. Mizes, 1985;
Williamson et a l ., 1987). Thus, it has been hypothesized that bulimia nervosa is another behavioral manifestation of depression and is not an
independent syndrome. In the affective variant hypothesis, bulimia nervosa and depression are viewed
as equivalent disorders with the same organic etiology
(cf. Hudson, Pope, Jonas, Laffer, Hudson, & Melby,
1983) .
Biological or organic formulations of depression are based on three main classes of observations.
First, depressive disorders are accompanied by changes 11
Table 5. DSM-IIIR Diagnostic Criteria for Dysthymia
A. Depressed mood most of the day, more days than not for at least two years. B. Presence, while depressed, of at least two of the following: 1. poor appetite or overeating; 2. insomnia or hypersomnia; 3. low energy or fatigue; 4. low self-esteem; 5. poor concentration or difficulty making decisions; 6. feelings of hopelessness; C. During a two-year period of the disturbance, never without the daily depressed mood for more than two months at a time.
American Psychiatric Association (1987). 12
In biological functions such as appetite and sleep, psychomotor activity, and sexual interest; second, depressed patients frequently report a positive history of affective disorder in first degree relatives which may support the theory of genetic transmission; third, biological treatments such as antidepressant medication frequently result in amelioration of depressive signs and symptoms (Carson
& Carson, 1984; Davis & Sharma, 1986) although the mechanism of antidepressant action is unclear (Gerner
& Bunney, 1986).
The affective variant hypothesis of bulimia nervosa was derived from these same three areas of research. In addition, several studies have suggested a high prevalence of depressive symptoms to be associated with bulimia nervosa. Research addressing the family history of depression in those diagnosed as bulimic, results of biological tests for depression in bulimia, and outcome using antidepressant medications to treat bulimia have led to the theory that bulimia nervosa is a variant of depressive disorder. These three areas of research as well as studies looking at the association of depression and bulimic symptoms 13
will be reviewed.
Depressive symptoms in bulimia nervosa. An association between depression and bulimia nervosa has frequently been reported (Pyle et a l ., 1981). Some studies have shown that bulimic patients do evidence mood disturbance (cf. Davis, Freeman, &. Solyom, 1985;
Fairburn, 1983; Herzog, 1984: Russell, 1979).
Although survey studies are methodologically weak, results from these studies suggest that from 17 to 75 percent of subjects who endorsed bulimic behaviors also endorsed symptoms indicative of either current or past depression (Abraham & Beaumont, 1982; Fairburn &
Cooper, 1982; Johnson, Stuckey, Lewis, & Schwartz,
1983; Hatsukami, Eckert, Mitchell, &. Pyle, 1984;
Herzog, 1982; Johnson, Stuckey, Mitchell, Hatsukami,
Eckert, & Pyle, 1985). This wide range in number of subjects endorsing both bulimia and depression exists in part to methods of assessment as well as differences in the criteria used to identify both bulimia and depression. These studies have used unstructured interviews and questionnaires designed for the specific project and the psychometric 14
properties were not reported. Studies in which standardized diagnostic criteria and structured interviews were employed found the lower incidence of depression associated with bulimia (Herzog, 1984;
Walsh, Roose, Glassman, Gladis, & Sadik, 1985).
Another problem with survey studies is that because investigators were not blind to diagnosis the data were subject to experimenter bias. Hinz and
Williamson (1987) pointed out that the incidence rate of current affective disorder in bulimic subjects was lower (24 to 33 percent) when structured interviews and standardized diagnostic criteria were used, and the high incidence rates occurred only when lifetime
(past and present depressive episodes) data were
included.
A number of studies have used standardized objective measures and included a non-eating disordered control group (Hatsukami, Owen, Pyle, &
Mitchell, 1982; Prather & Williamson, 1988; Weiss &
Ebert, 1983; Williamson, Kelley, Davis, Ruggiero, &
Blouin, 1985; Williamson, Prather, Upton, Ruggiero,
Davis & VanBuren, 1987). Without exception depression scores were found to be significantly higher in 15
bulimic groups than the control groups. Williamson et al. (1985) found that 35 to 40 percent of their bulimic subjects obtained clinically significant scores on objective measures of depression (T-score above 70 on the MMPI Depression subscale and/or a Beck
Depression Inventory score above 20). Prather and
Williamson (1988) replicated this incidence of clinically elevated scores using the MMPI and BDI.
In addition, one study documented that more frequent self-induced vomiting was associated with higher scores on measures of depression (Williamson, Prather,
Upton, Davis, Ruggiero, & VanBuren, 1987).
An association between bulimia nervosa and depression has been consistently documented in approximately 30 percent of patients with bulimia nervosa. However, causality should not be inferred from this association. Depression has been found to be associated with several disorders. One can entertain other hypotheses which have not been empirically eliminated to explain the asso'ciation between depression and bulimia nervosa. For example, depression could occur due to the lack of control the 16
bulimic individual begins to feel, or depressive symptoms could be a reflection of inadequate nutrition.
Family history of depression. The second area of research used to support the affective variant hypothesis is familial association of depression. The heritability of depression is measured by investigating the incidence of affective disorders occurring in bulimics' relatives. Some researchers have reported a high occurrence of affective disorders among the relatives of bulimia nervosa patients
(Hudson, Laffer, & Pope, 1982; Hudson, Pope, Jonas, &
Yurgelun-Todd, 1983; Pyle, Mitchell, & Eckert, 1981).
The first investigators of the family history of depression in bulimia nervosa reported that approximately 60 percent of bulimics had a positive family history of affective disorder (Hudson, Laffer,
& Pope, 1982; Hudson, Pope, Jonas, & Yurgelun-Todd,
1983; Lee, Rush, & Mitchell, 1985). There were several methodological problems with these studies which included small sample size, investigators not blind to diagnosis, and use of patient report of family history of affective disorder when relatives 17
were not available.
Controlled studies using investigators blind to diagnosis have found a much lower occurrence of
affective disorder in relatives of individuals diagnosed as bulimic. In fact. Stern, Dixon, Nemzer,
Lake, Sansone, Smetzer, Lantz, and Schrier (1984) using a control group, blind diagnosis, and interviews
of subjects' mothers found no difference between the
frequency of affective disorder in relatives of
bulimics and relatives of a control group. There were
368 relatives of bulimics and 384 relatives of control
subjects included in the Stern et al. (1984) study.
Rates of familial depression have been the highest when using retrospective, self-report methods. To date no studies have been reported investigating the
familial association of depression in monozygotic and dizygotic twins who are also bulimic. This
information is important as it has been shown that monozygotic twins have a higher concordance rate of
affective disorder than do dizygotic twins (Bertelson,
Harvald, & Hauge, 1977).
In addition to incidence rates of affective 18
disorder in relatives of bulimia nervosa patients, it would also be relevant to investigate the incidence rates of bulimia nervosa in relatives of affective
patients. If bulimia nervosa and affective disorder had the same etiology the relatives of affective
disorder patients would be expected to develop bulimia
nervosa more frequently than would occur in the
general population. In a study described by Strober
and Katz (1987) first-degree relatives of patients
diagnosed with affective disorders had a low incidence
rate of eating disorders. The rates of eating
disorders in relatives of depressed, manic, and
schizophrenic patients ranged from 0.6 to 1.3 percent
which was not significantly different than lifetime
expectancy in the general population (Strober & Katz,
1987) .
Dexamethasone suppression test of depression. A
third group a studies addressing the affective variant
hypothesis were designed to investigate the results of
a biological test of depression. The dexamethasone
suppression test (DST) has been purported to identify
depressive patients due to their abnormal or
nonsuppression of cortisol following injection of 19
dexamethasone. The dexamethasone suppresses cortisol
In nondepressed patients. Results of DST studies have shown similarities in nonsuppression of cortisol between bulimia nervosa and affective disorder patients (Gwirtsman, Roy-Byrne, Yager, & Gerner, 1983;
Hudson, Laffer, & Pope, 1982; Hudson et a l . , 1983;
Lindy &. Walsh, Roose, Gladis, & Glassman, 1985) . Four studies found that a high percentage of bulimic patients evidenced abnormal DST responses, that is, failed to suppress cortisol. Percentages varied from
35 percent (Lindy et a l ., 1985) to 67 percent
(Gwirtsman et al., 1983). The abnormal DST responses in bulimic patients could be a result of other factors such as weight or nutrition abnormalities.
The ability of the DST to identify depressives has been adequately challenged (Birch, 1985; Walsh, Roose,
Glassman, Gladis, & Sadik, 1985), and results of the
DST are even more questionable for eating disordered
individuals. It is known that weight change and nutrition affect the outcome of the DST (Carroll,
Feinberg, & Greden, 1981; Fichter, Pirhe, & Holsboer,
1986; Smith, Bledsoe, &. Chetri, 1975; Stahl & Kravitz, 20
1986). Bulimic patients often have frequent weight
fluctuations and inconsistent nutritional intake.
Gwirtsman et a l . (1983) did find that low body weight was related to abnormal DST responses. Lindy et a l .
(1985) failed to confirm this relationship between body weight and DST response. Other studies (Hudson et al., 1982; Hudson et a l ., 1983) did not control for weight status.
The DST has also been faulted for not being specific. Other disordered populations such as
alcoholics, obsessive-compulsive patients, and patients diagnosed with borderline personality
disorder have been found to evidence an abnormal DST response (Hinz & Williamson, 1987).
Antidepressant medications. The final area of
research included in the affective variant hypothesis
comes from the treatment of bulimic patients with
antidepressant medications. It has been reported that bulimia nervosa patients reduced bulimic behaviors when treated with antidepressant medications (Agras &
McCann, 1987; Pope & Hudson, 1986). Early
uncontrolled reports (Jonas, Pope, &. Hudson, 1983;
Mendels, 1983; Moore, 1977; Pope & Hudson, 1982; Rich, 21
1978; Roy-Byrne, Gwirtsman, & Edelstein, 1983; Shader
& Greenblat, 1982; Walsh, Stewart, Wright, Harrison,
Roose, S. Glassman, 1982) were suggestive that some bulimic patients may improve when treated with antidepressants.
The first controlled study to be reported (Sabine,
Yonance, Farrington, Barratt, & Wakeling, 1983) treated 50 bulimic patients with the antidepressant mianserin. They found no differences in bulimic symptoms between placebo and drug conditions. They also reported that no significant improvement occurred in binge eating or self-induced vomiting during pharmacological treatment. In contrast. Pope, Hudson,
Jonas, & Yurgelun-Todd (1983) reported a significant difference between placebo and imipramine groups in decreased binge eating behavior. At the end of treatment 35 percent of their patients treated with imipramine were reported to be in remission of bulimic symptoms (Pope et a l ., 1983). Pope and Hudson (1986) suggested that the differing results between Sabine et al. (1983) and Pope et al. (1983) may have been due to insufficient dosage in Sabine et al. (1983) and/or 22
more severely 111 patients In Pope et a l . (1983).
Walsh. Stewart, Roose, Gladis, and Glassman (1984) reported a significant difference between placebo and phenelzine treated bulimic patients in binge eating frequency but no differences for measures of depression. Very few of the original 35 patients were included in the final data analysis (15 patients) so results must be interpreted cautiously.
Placebo responders were eliminated during a wash-out phase thus biasing the results in favor of phenelzine.
In studies assessing blood plasma levels to insure a therapeutic medication dose was reached treatment outcome results have been inconsistent. Three studies to date have been reported (Agras, Dorian, Kirkley,
Arnow, & Bachman, 1987; Hughes, Wells, Cunningham, &
Ilstrup, 1986; Mitchell & Groat, 1984). One study
(Hughes et al., 1986) reported significant differences between placebo and desipramine treated bulimic patients in improved binge eating frequency and one depression measure. Agras et al. (1987) found imipramine to be superior over placebo in reducing bulimic symptoms, however depression was not significantly improved. Mitchell and Groat (1984) 23
comparing amitriptyline to placebo found no differences between placebo and drug groups on any bulimic symptoms. They did report significant improvement in the drug group on one measure of depression (Hamilton Depression Scale) but not on another (Zung Depression Scale).
Due to the inconsistent treatment outcome in these studies treating bulimic patients with antidepressant medications one cannot conclude that bulimia nervosa is a variant of affective disorder with the same organic etiology. The fact that some antidepressants were found to be effective in reducing binge eating frequency in some patients does not mean that bulimia is an affective disorder. One must consider the fallacy of inferring causality from treatment results.
The mechanism of antidepressant treatment effects is unclear. These medications have been used in treating disorders that have not been considered affective variants (Hinz & Williamson, 1987). As Walsh et al.,
(1985) stated, imipramine has been used to treat cardiac arrhythmias even though cardiac disorders are not a variant of affective disorder. It is 24
inappropriate to assume the circular logic that two or more disorders are the same because the same
intervention is effective across the disorders. More
importantly, when comparing the outcome of treatment
studies, treatment of bulimia with antidepressant medications has been no more effective than
cognitive-behavioral treatments. Typically, a 30 to
40 percent abstinent rate is reported in studies
incorporating either treatment modality (Agras, 1987;
Kirkley, Schneider, Agras, & Bachman, 1985).
Summary of research evidence. In summary, it has been documented that bulimia nervosa has been
frequently accompanied by depression. Depression is known to be associated with many chronic psychological
and physical disorders, e.g., agoraphobia (Munjack &
Moss, 1981), alcoholism (Cadoret & Winokur, 1974),
chronic pain (Keefe, 1982). The depressive symptoms
associated with bulimia nervosa may also be due to the
chronic, cyclic pattern of this eating disorder. As
noted by Klerman (1980) pathological depression may exist as a separate syndrome or in association with
another disorder.
Studies investigating family history of 25
depression, the dexamethasone suppression test for depression, and treatment of bulimia nervosa with antidepressant medications have not provided conclusive evidence that bulimia nervosa is a variant of affective disorder. It has been established that there is an association between depression and bulimia nervosa in some patients, however, these studies are
incapable of determining the etiology of bulimia nervosa. A review of the research literature related to the affective variant hypothesis conducted by
Swift, Andrews, and Barklage (1986) summized that although there may be some type of relationship between eating disorders and affective disorder, the nature of the relationship is unclear. In a more recent review Hinz and Williamson (1987) concluded that although some research has supported the affective variant hypothesis of bulimia the propositions which follow from this hypothesis have not been conclusively supported. They suggested
further research directly comparing bulimics and depressives using measures related to depression as well as measures related to bulimia (Hinz & 26
Williamson, 1987).
Comparison of bulimia nervosa and depression.
Prior to this study only one study has directly
compared the symptoms of patients diagnosed with bulimia nervosa against patients diagnosed with major depression (Cooper & Fairburn, 1986). Both bulimia
nervosa and major depression groups were assessed
using the Present State Examination (Wing, Cooper, &
Sartorius, 1974) and the Montgomery and Asberg
Depression Rating Scale (Montgomery & Asberg, 1979).
Bulimia nervosa patients were diagnosed using criteria
from Russell (1979). A diagnosis of depression was
based on the Research Diagnostic Criteria (Spitzer,
Endicott, & Robins, 1978). The affective variant
hypothesis was evaluated by comparing the presence of
depressive symptoms in the two clinical groups.
Bulimia nervosa patients were found to evidence more
anxiety, obsessional ideas, and pessimistic thought.
These same subjects were found to endorse less simple
depression, apparent sadness, sleep disturbance, and
suicidal thought than the major depression patients.
The authors concluded that there were different
symptom patterns evident for the two patient groups 27
and that depressive symptoms are likely to be secondary to bulimia nervosa (Cooper & Fairburn,
1986). They did not compare bulimia nervosa with a dual diagnosis of major depression to bulimia nervosa without major depression. If the affective variant hypothesis is valid bulimia nervosa patients with and without clinical depression should not differ on a variety of measures of psychopathology. Whereas, if depression is secondary to bulimia nervosa, then only those bulimics who are also depressed should evidence psychopathology similar to a depressed sample.
Affective variant hypothesis: Further evaluation.
Bulimia nervosa subjects and major depression subjects consistently achieve similar scores on general measures of depressive symptomatology, but research does not support the hypothesis that these two disorders are necessarily derived from the same etiology (Hinz & Williamson, 1987; Swift, Andrews, &
Barklage, 1986). Cooper and Fairburn (1986) further questioned the hypothesis by finding that bulimia nervosa and depressive patients have different symptom patterns. 28
The important question then becomes, are depressed bulimia nervosa patients different from nondepressed bulimia nervosa patients? What variables besides specific eating behaviors might define the relationship between bulimia nervosa and depression?
Researchers frequently evaluate depression on three dimensions which include cognitive, behavioral, and somatic symptoms. Perhaps bulimic and depressed
individuals differ on one or more of these specific dimensions of depression even though they do not differ on general measures of depression.
Cognitive Dimension. Cognitive theories of depression (Beck 1967, 1976) postulate that depressives experience negative cognitions that distort their view of the self, world, and future.
Depressive symptoms are seen as a direct result of this negative cognitive set. In cognitive theory of depression it has been proposed that individuals
learn, through early experiences, cognitive styles (or schemata) that function to screen, categorize, and evaluate stimuli (Beck, 1974). These schemata result
in self-concepts and personal expectations that are global, rigid, and negative (Hollon & Beck, 1979). 29
Several systematic cognitive distortions may result
from these schemata (Beck, 1967). The most common of
these errors in logic are explained in Table 6. The relationship of the biased cognitive style to depression has been widely researched and supported.
Hammen, Krantz, and Cochran (1981) found that
perceptions of globality (belief that the event would
affect other aspects of the person's life) and low
controllability were predictive of depression onset.
This finding has been replicated in other
investigations (cf. Golin, Sweeney, & Shaeffer, 1981).
Because the presence of a negative cognitive style has
been adequately linked to the onset of depression, it
is plausible that measures of dysfunctional cognitions
would not discriminate between bulimia nervosa and
depression subjects if the affective variant
hypothesis was correct. The questions of interest were, (a) do bulimics and depressives have similar
cognitive dysfunction and (b) do depressed bulimics
differ from nondepressed bulimics on measures of
cognitive dysfunction?
Behavioral Dimension. In behavioral theories of 30
Table 6. Common Cognitive Errors
1. Arbitrary inference: drawing a conclusion in the absence of evidence or when the evidence is contrary to the conclusion. 2. Selective abstraction: focusing on a negative detail in a situation and conceptualizing the entire experience on the basis of this negative fragment. 3. Overgeneralization: drawing a general rule or conclusion on the basis of one isolated incident and appling the concept indiscriminately to both related and unrelated situations. 4. Magnification and minimization: overestimating the significance or magnitude of undesirable events and underestimating the significance or magnitude of desirable events. 5. Personalization: relating external events to oneself without evidence. 6. All-or-none thinking: thinking in absolute black or white, all-or-none terms.
Beck (1967) 31
depression it has been postulated that depression is a consequence of reduced response-contingent positive reinforcement (Lewinsohn, 1974). Reinforcement, in this context, refers to the quality of one's interactions with one's environment. Productive, social behavior of depressed persons does not result in sufficient positive reinforcement to maintain the behavior. This low rate of pleasurable activity provides little or no rewarding interactions with the environment and is assumed to lead to dysphoric feelings that lead to further reduction in responses that might be positively reinforcing. A positive correlation between positive mood and frequency of participation in pleasant activities has been documented by Lewinsohn and Graf (1973) and Lewinsohn and Libet (1972). The average rate of participation in pleasurable activities as well as the subjective enjoyability of potentially reinforcing events were both lower in depressed subjects relative to psychiatric and normal control subjects (Lewinsohn &
MacPhillamy, 1974; MacPhillamy & Lewinsohn, 1974).
Again, the question to be answered was, would the interaction between depression and bulimia nervosa 32
result in more severe scores indicating less participation in and enjoyabi1ity of activities?
Somatic Dimension. Endogenous depression or depression with an organic etiology is well known to be accompanied by physical or somatic signs which have been described as vegetative. These somatic signs include appetite disturbance, sleep disturbance, psychomotor disturbance, and fatigue or loss of energy. The presence of these somatic features in depressed patients has been used to support the biological theory of affective disorders. Cooper and
Fairburn (1986) reported a significant difference between bulimics and depressives in sleep disturbance.
Other somatic signs were either not significant or not reported.
Bulimics have been found to endorse test items reflecting somatic distress arising from concerns about bodily dysfunction (Williamson et al., 1985).
Bulimics achieved higher scores than normals did on the Somatization subscale of the Symptom Checklist
90-Revised. The Somatization subscale measures complaints focused on cardiovascular. 33
gastrointestinal, respiratory systems, and other signs with strong autonomic mediation (Derogatis, 1977).
The signs and symptoms included on this subscale are reported to be somatic equivalents of anxiety
(Derogatis, 1977). Available reports concerning somatic symptoms suggest that bulimic individuals may experience anxiety symptoms, but the presence of vegetative signs associated with depression in bulimic
individuals is unclear. Knowing whether vegetative
signs differ between bulimics with and without a diagnosis of depression would be useful in evaluating
the affective variant hypothesis of bulimia nervosa,
especially since this hypothesis was based on a
biological theory.
Obsessions-compulsions. As noted by Lehmann
(1985), an association between depression and
compulsive and obsessional features has long been
recognized. This relationship, however, has been
reported to be a complex one since not all depressed
patients develop obsessive-compulsive problems nor do
all obsessive-compulsive patients develop depressive
complaints (Sturgis, 1984). Co-occurrence rates have
been reported to range from 20 to 45 percent 34
(Gittleson, 1966; Kringlen, 1965; Rachman & Hodgson,
1980). Cooper and Fairburn (1986) found that only 2.5 percent of the depressed subjects evidenced obsessional ideas and ruminations. It appears that obsessive-compulsive patients may also evidence symptoms of depression but few depressive show obsess ive-compu1s ive symptoms.
The anxiety model of bulimia, incorporated obsessive-compulsive components as a central feature of bulimia nervosa (Rosen & Leitenberg, 1982).
Anxiety and fear of weight gain are reported to follow binge eating. As can be seen in Figure 1, purgative behavior reduces this anxiety and fear thus negatively reinforcing purging (Williamson, Prather, Goreczny,
Davis, & McKenzie, 1989). The DSM-IIIR (American
Psychiatric Association, 1987) diagnostic criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder follow a similar pattern. Ruminative obsessions result in anxiety and distress; engaging in compulsive behavior is said to aid the patient in avoiding or escaping anxiety and obsessive thoughts (DSM-IIIR, 1987).
Several studies have consistently demonstrated Distorted Depression- Interpersonal Body Image & Family & Low S elf-E steem Problems \ t /
/ \ / Anxiety \ \ / Biological Anxiety Reduction \ & Purge \ / Deprivation W orry / & concerning \ I Hunger Weight Gain \ Elimination I of Energy \ and \ Nutrients \ \ s / Obsessive Stress ai Compulsive Substance Habits Abuse 36
that bulimic individuals who purge evidence obsessive-compulsive characteristics (Cooper &
Fairburn, 1986; Hatsukami, Owen, Pyle, & Mitchell,
1982; Prather & Williamson, 1988; Scott & Baroffio,
1986; Williamson, Kelley, Davis, Ruggiero, & Blouin,
1985). Cooper and Fairburn (1986) found that 80 percent of their bulimic sample endorsed items on the
Present State Examination indicative of obsessional ideas and ruminations. Obsessional ideas and ruminations contributed most to the discrimination of bulimia nervosa subjects from depressives (Cooper &
Fairburn, 1986). Williamson et al. (1985) reported that bulimics differed significantly from a normal control group on the MMPI clinical scale number seven
(Psychasthenia) which is associated with obsessive thinking and anxiety. Prather and Williamson (1988) found that 62 percent of bulimia nervosa subjects obtained clinically elevated scores (T-score equal to or greater than 70) on MMPI scale seven or
Psychasthenia.
In summary, although obsessive-compulsive patients may also evidence symptoms of depression few depressives show obsessive-compulsive symptoms. In 37
comparison, several studies have documented that bulimia nervosa subjects experience obsessive- compulsive characteristics. From these data, it could be expected that bulimic patients but not depressives would frequently endorse obsessive-compulsive symptoms.
Anxiety. Anxiety symptoms may accompany depressive disorders although anxiety disorders are
less commonly accompanied by depression (Lehmann,
1983). A 58 percent incidence rate of anxiety symptoms in a group of depressed patients was reported by Leckman, Weissman, Merikangas, Pauls, and Prusoff
(1983). They also concluded that depressed patients
feeling anxiety symptoms had early onset and severe depression (Leckman et a l ., 1983). Cooper and
Fairburn (1986) found that within their depressed group 60 percent endorsed general anxiety while 37.5 percent endorsed situational anxiety.
High levels of anxiety have been reported in bulimic samples (Cooper & Fairburn, 1986; Fairburn &
Cooper, 1982; Pyle, Mitchell, & Eckert, 1981;
Williamson et al., 1985). Some researchers have 38
proposed that the cycle of binging and self-induced vomiting may be directly linked to anxiety
(Leitenberg, Gross, Peterson, Janis, & Rosen, 1984;
Rosen & Leitenberg, 1982). Others have associated anxiety with the anticipated lack of control experienced by bulimics (Palmer, 1979; Rau & Green,
1975). Cooper and Fairburn (1986) reported that 48.6 percent of bulimia nervosa subjects endorsed generalized anxiety items and 71.4 percent endorsed situational anxiety items on the Present State
Examination. Williamson et a l . (1985) reported significantly more severe scores for bulimic subjects than normal controls on the anxiety scale of the
Symptom Checklist 90-Revised. Using behavioral observation procedures Rosen and Leitenberg (1982) and
Leitenberg et al. (1984) found that bulimics reported increased subjective anxiety following eating a large test meal which they were kept from purging. Several studies utilizing psychophysiological recording have reported increased heart rate in bulimics after eating
(Janata, Klonoff, & Ginsberg, 1985; Leitenberg et a l .,
1984; Jarrell, Johnson, & Williamson, 1986;
Williamson, Goreczny, Davis, Ruggiero, & McKenzie, 39
1988). Two studies also reported a reduction heart rate immediately following purging a test meal (Janata et a l ., 1985; Jarrell et a l . , 1986). In a controlled study by Williamson et al. (1988) bulimics responded to eating with an immediate increase in heart rate, whereas the heart rate of normals decreased after eating. Thus, studies using subjective, behavioral, and psychophysiological measures consistently support the role of anxiety in bulimia nervosa. This anxiety is clearly associated with eating but may also be more generalized.
Current research has suggested that bulimic subjects experience more situational anxiety, while depressed subjects report more generalized anxiety.
The unanswered question was, how do bulimics with depression differ on situational and general anxiety symptoms from bulimics without depression and depressive patients without bulimia nervosa?
In summary, no past study of the affective variant hypothesis has controlled for depression in bulimia nervosa. It is unknown how bulimics with depression differ from bulimics without depression. In addition. 40
it is not known how these two eating disordered groups differ in cognitive style, behavioral style, or somatic signs from depressives or normal subjects.
Comparison of research on bulimia nervosa and research on depression suggests that bulimia nervosa subjects may exhibit more obsessive and situational anxiety characteristics than do both depressives and normals and more general anxiety than normals.
Summary
Bulimia nervosa is frequently accompanied by depressive symptoms which are often pervasive and severe. This association has led some researchers to hypothesize that bulimia nervosa is a variant of affective disorders. The only study comparing bulimics to depressives found that bulimics reported a different pattern of symptoms than the depressive patients (Cooper & Fairburn, 1986). The bulimic sample was found' to be more anxious and obsessive and less depressed than were the depressives.
The purpose of this study was to further examine the affective variant hypothesis expanding upon the findings of Cooper and Fairburn (1986) using specific measures of depression, anxiety, and obsessions- 41
compulsions. The main goal was to compare bulimia nervosa patients with and without depression, depression patients without eating disorders, and normal control subjects on cognitive, behavioral, and somatic variables. These patients were compared on cognitive dysfunction, behavioral activity and anhedonia, somatic signs of depression, general and situational anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms
in an attempt to identify variables other than eating and purging behaviors that could define the relationship between bulimia nervosa and depression.
Two main questions were addressed. First, would there be an interaction effect of bulimia nervosa and depression? Would bulimics with depression be more disturbed than nondepressed bulimia nervosa patients as reflected by scores on specific measures of different dimensions of depression? If the affective variant hypothesis was valid then these patients should not be disparate. It was hypothesized that bulimia nervosa patients without depression would be
less disturbed than bulimia nervosa patients with depression who would be more disturbed than depressed 42
patients on cognitive, somatic, and behavioral aspects of depression.
Second, would there be a main effect of bulimia nervosa, main effect of depression, and/or an
interaction effect of bulimia nervosa and depression on the measures of anxiety and obsessiveness? The second hypothesis proposed in this study was that there would be a main effect of bulimia nervosa but no main effect of depression or interaction effect of bulimia nervosa and depression. Nondepressed and depressed bulimics were predicted to endorse more anxiety and obsessiveness than depressives but not differ from each other. If the anxiety model of bulimia nervosa, which is analogous to an anxiety model of obsessive-compulsive disorder, was cogent bulimia nervosa patients with and without depression would not differ from each other on measures of anxiety and obsessive-compulsiveness. Method
Research Participants
Clinical subjects were recruited from patients presenting for evaluation and treatment during the
1987-88 year at three fee-for-services outpatient clinics and two inpatient hospitals. These treatment centers served both student and nonstudent patients.
Normal subjects were recruited through publicity from undergraduate psychology classes and from the community.
Included in the clinical sample were seventeen patients diagnosed with bulimia nervosa without depression, 18 patients diagnosed with bulimia nervosa and depression, and seventeen patients diagnosed with depression without eating disorders using DSM-IIIR criteria for bulimia nervosa, major depression, and dysthymia. The bulimia nervosa with depression group was comprised of 15 patients with major depression and three patients with dysthymia. The depression without eating disorders group included 11 patients with major depression and six patients with dysthymia. The normal control group consisted of 20 subjects who reported no depression or eating disorder problems.
The 72 subjects were all Caucasian. Using
43 44
Kruskal-Wal1 is nonparametric test of homogeneity of demographic variables, it was determined that the four groups were from the same population. Chi square analysis confirmed the groups were comparable in distribution of gender and marital status (see Table
7). The distribution of educational status was also 2 similar across groups, "X (.05, 3) = 0.59, p > .05).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) verified the similarity of groups on the variables of age, height, and weight.
Comparing the clinical groups there were no differences in either distribution of outpatient and
inpatient or medication status across the groups.
Comparing the depression groups there were no significant differences in distribution of major depression or dysthymia. To ensure that the clinical groups did not differ in severity of either depression or bulimia nervosa they were compared on the respective scores on the BDI and BULIT. The depressed bulimics and the noneating disordered depressed subjects did not differ on the BDI. The nondepressed bulimics were more depressed than the normals, however. The nondepressed and depressed bulimics did not differ on the BULIT. Complete demographic statistics can be reviewed in Table 7. 45
Table 7. Group Demographics
Variables Group Means F £
BN(Y) BN (Y) BN(N) BN(N) D (N) D (Y) D (Y) D (N)
Age 21.7 26.4 29.2 23.2 2.75 NS
Height 65.3 64.8 66.3 65.8 0.66 NS
Weight 134.4 141.4 143. 1 143.7 0.33 NS a b b c BDI 10.0 31 . 9 27.8 3.0 75.29 <.0001 a a b b BULIT 116.6 125.7 56.9 49.5 128.61 < .0001
Group Distributions Chi-Sq. d
n n n n Gender Male 2 1 3 2 1.38 NS Fema1e 15 17 14 18
Marital Married 3 7 8 4 4.81 NS Single 14 11 9 16
Outpatient Yes 16 14 14 NA 1.23 NS NO 1 4 3 NA
Medication Yes 2 8 7 NA 3.28 NS NO 15 10 10 NA
Depression Major Dep. NA 15 11 NA 2.27 NS Dysthymia NA 3 6 NA
BN(Y)=BulImia Nervosa, BN(N)=No Bulimia Nervosa, D(Y)=Depression, D(N)=No Depression. Groups with different superscripts are significant at £ < .05. 46
Assessment Instruments
Demographic data was collected from each subject using a questionnaire developed from the first two
pages of the Diagnostic Survey of Eating Disorders
(Johnson, 1985). Race, age, gender, height, weight, marital and educational status information was reported on the Demographic Questionnaire (see
Appendix A).
The Diagnostic Interview for Bulimia Nervosa
(DIBN), developed from Johnson’s (1985) Diagnostic
Survey of Eating Disorders, was used as a structured
interview to elicit information following the DSM-IIIR
criteria for a diagnosis of bulimia nervosa. Areas of
information covered during this interview were weight history, weight and body shape concerns, dieting
behavior, binge eating behavior, feelings of control while binging, purging behaviors, and exercise habits
(see Appendix B).
The Bulimia Test (BULIT) designed by Smith and
Thelen (1984) is a 32-item questionnaire which
assesses abnormal eating attitudes and behaviors
associated with bulimia (see Appendix C). Temporal
stability was reported as r = .54, p<.0001. Smith and
Thelen (1984) recommended using the research cut-off 47
score of 102 to reduce false positives, but that a score above 88 warrants clinical attention. Scores obtained on the BULIT were used for inclusion/exclusion criteria in this study. Normal control subjects had to score below 88 to be included while clinical subjects meeting the DSM-IIIR diagnostic criteria for bulimia nervosa had to also receive a score of 102 or above to be included.
The Schedule for Affective Disorders and
Schizophrenia (SADS) developed by Endicott and Spitzer
(1978) provide distinctive guidelines for interviewing patients to establish the presence of depressive symptoms and signs. Also available is a subtype of the SADS (see Appendix D) using questions that elicit information concerning signs and symptoms of major depression and dysthymia according to DSM-IIIR criteria (Leber, Beckham, &. Danker-Brown, 1985) . The
SADS depression Scale has been demonstrated to have high inter-rater reliability (r = .95 or higher) and high internal consistency (r = .95 or higher).
Concurrent validity for a diagnosis of depression has also been demonstrated (Endicott & Spitzer, 1978).
The SADS, DSM-III Subtype, was used to determine the diagnosis of major depression or dysthymia. 48
Scores obtained on the Beck Depression Inventory
(BDI) were used as an inclusion/exclusion criterion for subjects diagnosed as depressed. Depressed subjects had to obtain a score of 20 or above to remain in the study. Normal control subjects had to score below 11 on the BDI. The BDI is a standardized
21-item self-report questionnaire or interview measure which taps cognitive symptoms, somatic signs, and behavioral signs associated with clinical depression
(see Appendix E ) . A score of 20 or above has been recommended for research inclusion (Beck, 1978; Beck,
Ward, Mendelson, Mock, &. Erbaugh, 1961). A score above 10 has been considered clinically significant
(Beck, 1978). Test-retest reliability has been reported to range from r = .69 to .90 (Gallagher,
Nies, & Thompson, 1982; Strober, Green, & Carlson.
1981). Numerous studies of concurrent validity have demonstrated the BDI to have moderate to good validity
(Shaw, Vallis, & McCabe, 1985).
The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression
Scale (CES-D) developed by Radioff (1977) is a self- report measure designed to provide an index of the number and frequency of depressive signs and symptoms
(Orme, Reis, & Herz, 1986). The CES-D can be reviewed 49
in Appendix F. The CES-D has been found to have good
internal consistency across diverse population
subgroups as well as good test-retest stability
(Aneshensel, Clark, & Frerichs, 1983; Fava, 1983;
Radloff, 1977; Roberts, 1980; Ross & Mirowsky, 1984).
The CES-D differentiates between those in treatment
and those not in treatment for depression (Orme et
al., 1986). Factor analysis of the CES-D resulted in
four subscales related to depression, (a) depressed
affect, (b) positive affect, (c) somatic signs, and
(d) interpersonal difficulty (Radloff, 1977). The
Somatic subscale (CESD-SC) was used to measure whether
differences existed in somatic signs of depression
among the four groups.
The Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS) was
developed by Weissman and Beck (1978) to assess
cognitive dysfunction centering around general
irrational themes in thinking and negative thoughts
(see Appendix G ) . The DAS has been shown to have good
internal consistency (Weissman, 1979) and stability
over time (Hamilton & Abramson, 1983; O'Hara, Rehm, &
Campbell, 1982; Riskind, Beck, &. Smucker, 1983).
Construct validity was demonstrated by use of the DAS
with both clinical and nonclinical populations (Eaves 50
& Rush, 1984; Hamilton & Abramson, 1983). Concurrent validity has been demonstrated in several studies
(Dobson & Breiter, 1983; Riskind et al., 1983;
Weissman & Beck, 1978). Differences in cognitive dysfunction among the groups were assessed using DAS.
MacPhillamy and Lewinsohn (1972) designed the
Pleasant Events Schedule (PES) to assess self-reported frequency and enjoyment of engaging in common positive, reinforcing activities (see Appendix H). It was their contention that depressed individuals engage in fewer activities and experience less pleasure from activities. The psychometric properties of the PES reported by MacPhillamy and Lewinsohn (1972, 1974,
1982) were quite good. Test-retest reliability ranged from .69 to .88 for one-month test-retest. Validity studies reported satisfactory concurrent and predictive validity, and several studies also demonstrated construct validity showing significant correlations between mood and engagement in pleasant events (Hammen & Krantz, 1985). The PES was used to compare groups on both frequency (PES-F) and pleasantness (PES-P) of activities.
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) consists of two twenty-item self-report scales (see Appendix I) 51
which assess general anxiety proneness (trait anxiety) and current tension and apprehension or state anxiety
(Spielberger, Gorsuch, & Lushene, 1970). Adequate validity has been demonstrated as has satisfactory reliability (Spielberger. 1983). The STAI scores were included to compare situational (STAI-S) and general
(STAI-T) anxiety symptoms across groups.
Hodgson and Rachman (1977) developed the Mauds 1ev
Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (MOCI) to assess both general and specific obsessive-compulsive symptoms
(see Appendix J ) . The MOCI yields an overall obsessive-compulsive score plus five subscores of checking, cleaning, slowness, doubting conscientiousness, and ruminations. The MOCI total score has been found to have adequate reliability and validity, and two of the subscales (checking and cleaning) have been validated (Rachman & Hodgson,
1980). The MOCI total score was used to compare groups on obsessive—compulsivness.
Procedure
All subjects were given an informed consent form to read and sign before participating in this study
(Appendix K ) . All patients and control subjects were informed that they could decline participation at any 52
point without penalty.
Subjects were interviewed for diagnostic purposes using the structured interview for diagnosing bulimia nervosa (DIBN) and diagnosing depression (SADS).
Height and weight was measured for all subjects and the Demographic Questionnaire, BDI, and BULIT were administered. A diagnosis of bulimia nervosa with or without depression and depression without eating disorders was made during staffing supervised by
licensed psychologists with extensive experience in both eating disorders and depressive disorders.
Subjects meeting all inclusion criteria then completed a battery of instruments which included the DAS, PES-
F, PES-P, CESD-SC, STAI-S, STAI-T, and MOCI.
Normal control subjects were interviewed and administered the BDI and BULIT. To qualify the control subjects had to score below 88 on the BULIT and below 10 on the BDI. Those subjects not endorsing either bulimia nervosa or depressive signs and symptoms during the interview or on the BDI and BULIT were then measured for height and weight and administered the Demographic Questionnaire, DAS, PES-
F, PES-P, CESD-SC, STAI-S, STAI-T, and MOCI. Results
Group Comparisons
A 2 X 2 between—subjects multivariate analysis of
variance (MANOVA) was calculated on the seven
dependent variables: PES-F, PES-P, STAI-S, STAI-T,
MOCI, CESD-SC, and DAS. Independent variables were
bulimia nervosa (yes and no) and depression (yes and
no). Results of the multivariate test for homogeneity
of variance-covariance revealed statistically similar
variance-covariance matrices. Box's M = 12.83, p >.05.
Total number of subjects included was 72. The MANOVA
was followed by 2 X 2 factorial analyses of variance
(ANOVA), and significant ANOVAs were subjected to the
Scheffe' post hoc comparison test. The strength of
each effect was tested using canonical correlational
analyses (r ). To further describe these patients, c
ANOVAs of group effects was also conducted. Summaries
of the results are presented in Table 8 and Table 9.
Using Wilks' criterion, the 2 X 2 MANOVA resulted
in significant main effects for both bulimia [F(7,62)
= 8.25, p. < .0001] and depression (F(7,62) = 22.80, p
< .0001]. There was a significant main effect of
bulimia nervosa on all measures except the PES-F and
CESD-SC. The results reflected a relatively strong
53 54 association between bulimia nervoea and the combined dependent variables, r - .69. c
The main effect for depression, [F(7,62) = 22.80, p < .0001], resulted in a significant effect on five of the seven measures. The association was quite substantial between depression and the dependent variables, r = . 85. There was no main effect of c depression on the PES-F or PES-P. The summary of main effects is presented in Table 8.
There was a significant interaction between bulimia nervosa and depression [F(7,62) = 3.07, jo
< .01] on two dependent variables (see Table 8). The
STAI-T and PES-P were found to be high for all three clinical groups. These two measures were low only in the nondepressed subjects that were also not bulimic.
The addition of depression to bulimia had a significant effect on scores obtained by the clinical patients on the STAI-T and PES-P. The association between the interaction of the independent variables and the dependent variables was moderate, r = .51. c
Analyses of variance (ANOVAs) investigating the
combined effects of bulimia nervosa and depression yielded significant group effects for six of the seven variables. Only PES-F was not significant. A 55
Table 8. TESTS OF BULIMIA, DEPRESSION, AND THEIR INTERACTION
1 Univariate IV DV F P
Buiimla CESD-SC 0.50 NS STAI-T 34.08 .0001 STAI-S 4.60 .0360 DAS 22.55 .0001 MOCI 5.78 .0190 PES-P 6. 16 .0260 PES-F 0.39 NS
Depression CESD-SC 116.56 .0001 STAI-T 49.58 .0001 STAI-S 74.92 .0001 DAS 36.83 .0001 MOCI 19.80 .0001 PES-P 3.52 NS PES-F 3.57 NS
Buiimla by Depression CESD-SC 0. 18 NS STAI-T 15.75 .0001 STAI-S 2.33 NS DAS 2.12 NS MOCI 0.10 NS PES-P 4.15 .0460 PES-F 2.18 NS
1 Degrees of freedom for all ANOVAs was (1,68) . 56
complete summary of these analyses Is presented in
Table 9. The Scheffe post hoc test revealed that four measures (CESD-SC, STAI-S, DAS, and MOCI) distinguished between the two bulimia nervosa groups
(depressed and nondepressed). The depressed bulimics obtained more severe scores than did the nondepressed bulimics suggesting that the former is more obsessive, more situationally anxious, experiencing more somatic signs of depression and cognitive dysfunction. Two measures differentiated the nondepressed bulimics and the depressed group. The depressed patients (without bulimia nervosa) received higher scores on the CESD-SC and STAI-S. The nondepressed bulimic patients endorsed more symptoms than the normals on three measures including the STAI-T, DAS, and PES-P. The depressed bulimia nervosa and depressed groups did not differ statistically on any dependent variable. The depressed bulimics scored higher than the normals on all six of the significant measures, while the depressed group scored higher than the normals on four of the six measures (CESD-SC, STAI-S, STAI-T, and
DAS). These results suggest that the depressed bulimia nervosa patients were the most disturbed group. 57
Table 9. Summary of Combined Effects of Bulimia 1 Nervosa and Depression
Group Means and Standard Deviations 3 4 BN BN+D D NC FMeasure
a b b a CES-D,SC 2.9 9.1 8.9 2.2 39.6 <.0001 (2.4) (2.7) (3.3) (1.6)
a a a b STAI-T 65.8 72.2 68.3 45. 1 35.7 < .0001 (5.4) (6.9) (8.3) (12.5)
a b b a STAI-S 53.4 69.8 68.3 44.9 28.3 <.0001 (8.2) (7.5) (9.4) (12.6)
a b a, b c DAS 140.4 170.6 149 .1 99.8 21.9 < .0001 (24.3) (25.8) (27.5) (31.9)
a a a , b b PES-P 330 .4 333.6 338.1 414.2 4.6 < .005 (74.0) (99.1) (99.3) (50.3)
PES-F 233.4 227.7 209.8 256 .8 2.0 NS (56.3) (73.0) (65.6) (37.8)
a b a. b a MOCI 8.7 14.3 11.1 6.3 9.0 <.0001 (4.1) (6.6) (5.3) (3.5)
1 MANOVA F(21.179)=9.26, pC.OOOl. 2 Standard Deviations are presented in parentheses. Means with different superscripts differ significantly (g < .05). 3 BN=Bulimia Nervosa, BN+D=Bulimia Nervosa with Depression, D=Depression, NC=Normal Control. 4 Degrees of freedom for all ANOVAs was (3,68). 58
Correlational and Multiple Regression Analyses.
The results of the 2 X 2 Factorial MANOVA yielded strong main effects for both bulimia nervosa and depression, however, the interaction effect suggested that the combination of the independent variables had only an additive rather than a multiplicative effect on the dependent variables across the clinical subjects. Correlational analyses were computed among the seven variables and the BDI and BULIT to determine patterns of association among the seven measures of secondary psychopathology and measures of primary psychopathology of depression or bulimia nervosa (see
Table 10). Stepwise multiple regression analyses were used to determine the variables most highly associated with either depression or bulimia nervosa (see Table
11 and Table 12). Both correlational and stepwise multiple regression analyses were computed on bulimia nervosa subjects alone, depressed subjects alone, and total sample. These analyses were done to assess the association between level of severity of bulimia nervosa and depression and the measures of secondary psychopatho1ogy.
Bulimia nervosa. Correlational analysis including only bulimic subjects (both depressed and 59
Table 10. Correlational Analyses
Psychopatho1ogy Groups Primary Secondary Buiimic Depressed All (n-35) (n-35) (n-72)
BULIT STAI-T NS NS .53* DAS NS NS .48* BDI NS NS .34* STAI-S NS NS .31* CESD-SC NS NS NS MOCI NS NS NS PES-P NS NS NS PES-F NS NS NS
BDI CESD-SC .75* NS .77* STAI-S .77* NS .75* DAS .58* .41* .65* STAI-T .51* NS .64* MOCI .46* NS .51* BULIT NS NS .34* PES-P NS NS .31* PES-F NS NS NS
NS = No significant correlation. * Correlations listed differ significantly at £ <.01. 60
nondepressed) resulted in no significant associations
between the BULIT and the seven dependent variables.
There were several significant positive correlations
between the BDI and secondary measures. The STAI-S,
CESD-SC, DAS, STAI-T, and MOCI scores were
significantly correlated with the BDI scores within
the bulimic group (see Table 10).
Stepwise multiple regression analysis was
unsuccessful in producing any secondary measure that
was significant in prediction of the primary
psychopathology (BULIT) in the bulimic groups (see
Table 11). Stepwise multiple regression analysis
predicting BDI score for only the bulimic subjects
found only two variables contributed significantly to
prediction of the BDI score (see Table 12). The
STAI-S and CESD-SC were significantly correlated with
the BDI scores and accounted for a large proportion of 2 the variance (R = .69).
Depression. Correlational analysis including only
the depressed subjects resulted in no significant
correlations between the primary psychopathology of
bulimia nervosa (BULIT) and the secondary variables.
One significant correlation between the primary
psychopathology of depression (BDI) and the DAS was 61
Table 11. Stepwise Multiple Regression Analyses for BULIT
Variables 2 Groups in Equation Beta R p
Buiimic None (n-35)
Depressed None (n-35)
All STAI-T 0.53 .28 <.0001 (n-72)
Table 12. Stepwise Multiple Regression Analyses for BDI
Variables 2 Groups in Equation Beta R p
Bulimic STAI-S 0.49 (n-35) CESD-SC 0.43 .69 <.01
Depressed DAS 0.34 .12 <.05 (n-35)
All CESD-SC 0.48 (n-72) STAI-S 0.44 .70 <.0001 62
found.
Stepwise multiple regression analysis correlating
BDI score for the depressed groups found one variable to be significantly correlated with level of depression. The DAS was found to be correlated with 2 the BDI (R = .12). Stepwise multiple regression analysis found no associations between the BULIT and secondary variables within the depressed subjects.
Total sample. There were several significant correlations between the BULIT and BDI and the secondary variables when all subjects were included.
The BULIT was found to correlate with the STAI-T, DAS
BDI, and STAI-S. Stepwise multiple regression analysis, however, showed the STAI-T to be the only measure of secondary psychopathology to be associated 2 with BULIT scores (R = .28). The BDI was found to correlate with all of the other measures except PES-F
Stepwise multiple regression analysis found the CESD-
SC and STAI-S to account for the most variance in BDI 2 scores (R = .57).
Finally, there was no significant correlation between the BULIT and the BDI within either the bulimia nervosa or the depression subjects. When the normal control subjects were included a significant 63
correlation between these two measures of primary psychopathology was found. Discussion
It has been hypothesized that bulimia nervosa is a form of affective disorder and that the two disorders share a common etiology (cf. Hudson et a l . 1983).
Although the research has not supported the hypothesis of common etiology, the fact remains that bulimia nervosa patients frequently report depressive signs and symptoms (cf. Mizes, 1985). Cooper and Fairburn
(1986), however, found depressive symptoms in bulimia nervosa patients to be nonspecific and different than the symptom pattern of depressed patients (Cooper &
Fairburn, 1986). In addition to finding differing patterns of depression between the bulimia nervosa and the depressed group. Cooper and Fairburn (1986) also found that bulimia nervosa patients evidenced higher
levels of situational anxiety and obsessiveness, while depressives were more generally anxious. Their findings suggested a difference between bulimia nervosa and depression. However, it was not known how many of the bulimia nervosa patients also met criteria
for depression. The question unanswered was how nondepressed and depressed bulimia nervosa patients compared to depressed patients on measures of depression, anxiety, and obsessiveness.
64 65
This study was designed to address that question by testing the affects of bulimia nervosa and depression on various dimensions of depression,
anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive characteristics.
Dimensions of depression included in this
investigation were somatic complaints, cognitive
style, and behavioral style. Specific measures of
state and trait anxiety and obsessive-compulsiveness
were included.
The first hypothesis addressed the affective
variant hypothesis. In this study it was proposed
that bulimics without depression would be healthier
than both depressed bulimics and non-eating-disordered
depressives on various dimensions of depression. The
second hypothesis supporting the anxiety model of
bulimia nervosa stated that there would be a main
effect of bulimia nervosa but no interaction effect of
bulimia nervosa and depression on the anxiety
measures. Nondepressed and depressed bulimics were
predicted to not differ from each other but to achieve
more severe scores than depressives on measures of
anxiety.
Results suggested both bulimia nervosa and
depression have strong main effects, but the 66
interaction of the two does not appear to have more than an additive affect upon the secondary psychopathology measured in this study. Depression was more clearly associated with these measures than was bulimia nervosa. Level of depression was highly associated with dysfunctional cognitions, somatic complaints, state anxiety, trait anxiety, and obsessiveness. Level of bulimia nervosa was not associated with any secondary measure.
Hypothesis One. The results of this investigation argue against the affective variant hypothesis. The proposition that depressed and nondepressed bulimia nervosa and depressed patients would be similar was not supported. The depressed bulimia patients were more disturbed than the nondepressed bulimics. In addition, there was no main effect of bulimia nervosa on somatic signs and frequency of activity, and there was no main effect of depression on either frequency of activity or pleasure rating of activities. Even though nondepressed bulimics did not evidence the somatic signs of depression they were not completely
free from symptoms associated with depression
(anhedonia and cognitive dysfunction). It should be kept in mind that the nondepressed bulimic subjects 67
did score higher than the normals on the BDI. It may be that even a very mild level of depression may affect the scores on these two variables, although there was no influence on somatic signs.
Cooper and Fairburn (1986) reported more pessimistic thinking in bulimia nervosa patients than depressed patients. In this study, although cognitive dysfunction occurred in both depressed and nondepressed bulimics, the dysfunction was associated only with depression. The dysfunction of the depressed bulimic was significantly more severe than nondepressed bulimics. Cooper and Fairburn (1986)
found that their depressed group endorsed more somatic signs of depression than did the bulimics. The
current study confirmed and expanded upon that
finding; somatic complaints were associated only with depression and not bulimia nervosa.
Results related to hypothesis one have relevant
assessment implications. Although incidence reports of affective disorder in bulimia nervosa have averaged
around 50 percent (Lee, Rush, & Mitchell, 1985), Katz
(1987) has questioned whether depression may be missed
in the remaining bulimia nervosa patients. The
findings in this study argue against that explanation. 68
Bulimia nervosa patients not diagnosed with affective disorder were different from both the depressed
bulimia nervosa and the depressed patients. The bulimia nervosa group was generally less disturbed
than either the depressed bulimia nervosa group or the depressed group.
In contrast to Katz's (1987) questioning whether a
diagnosis of depression is being overlooked, Altshuler
and Weiner (1985) questioned whether those bulimia
nervosa patients diagnosed with affective disorder
actually had a depressive disorder. These authors
stated that core sign and symptom of somatic
difficulties and anhedonia are typically not present
in "depressed" bulimia nervosa patients. Because the
depressed bulimics in this study achieved a score
similar to depressives on the somatic scale of the
CES-D suggests the presence of these somatic
difficulties. Anhedonia measured by the PES-P was
similar across both bulimic groups and the depressed
group indicating that not only is anhedonia a problem
for depressed bulimics but also for nondepressed
bulimics. More research investigating the
relationship between bulimia and anhedonia is needed.
Hypothesis Two. The second proposition of this 69
investigation stated there would be a main effect of bulimia nervosa on the anxiety measures. That is, the nondepressed bulimics and depressed bulimics would not differ from each other but differ from depressives on anxiety and obsessive-compulsive variables. Following from the anxiety model of bulimia nervosa, bulimic patients were believed to be more anxious and obsessive than depressives. This hypothesis was not supported. There was a main effect of bulimia nervosa on these measures, however there was also a main effect of depression. The interaction effect suggested that the addition of depression to bulimia did not statistically affect the scores of bulimics on any of the anxiety measures beyond that achieved by depression alone. Trait anxiety was similar across the clinical patients and was low only in the normal subjects. Nondepressed bulimics shared only trait anxiety with depressed bulimics, and the depressed bulimics did not differ from the depressives on any of the measures. The results of this study differ from
Cooper and Fairburn’s (1986) findings. Those authors found bulimics to be more obsessive and situationally anxious than depressives. The current study found that only depression correlated with state anxiety and 70
obsessiveness.
Researchers have consistently confirmed the presence of anxiety and obsessiveness resulting from food and weight related situations in bulimic patients
(Barrios & Pennebaker, 1982; Cooper & Fairburn, 1986;
Janata et al., 1985; Leitenberg et a l ., 1984; Jarrell et al., 1986; Rosen & Leitenberg, 1982; Williamson et al., 1988). Investigations of nonfood and nonweight anxiety and obsessiveness have been less convincing.
Johnson, Stuckey, Lewis, and Schwartz (1983) found that bulimics did not differ from normals on anxiety and obsessive-compulsive subscales of the Hopkins’
Symptom Checklist. Others have found that bulimics scored higher than normals on the Psychasthenia scale
(Scale 7) of the MMPI (Prather &. Williamson, 1988;
Scott & Barrofio, 1986; Williamson et al., 1985).
Cooper and Fairburn (1986) measured obsessiveness and anxiety as either situational or general. They found situational anxiety and obsessiveness but not general anxiety in bulimics. None of these studies controlled for depression status. The current study found trait anxiety in bulimics regardless of depression while state anxiety and obsessiveness were problematic only in depressed bulimics. 71
Although there has been consistent empirical support for the anxiety model in relationship to eating disorder signs and symptoms, the results from this study suggest that the model may not generalize to nonfood areas. Noneating related anxiety and obsessiveness appear to be related to depression.
A recent study (Burrows, Ribordy, & Johnson, 1989) found that bulimic individuals were accurate when defining their emotional states. Thus, we have confidence that our patients were able to discriminate and apply the dimensions measured in this investigation. Burrows et a l . (1989) also found that bulimic patients were deficient in coping with their emotions and this deficiency was related to depression. The results of the present study combined with Burrows et a l . (1989) and other research suggest that depression may seriously affect the secondary psychopathology as well as reduce coping abilities of bulimia nervosa patients.
It appears that bulimia nervosa has less association with secondary psychopathology than does depression. The two bulimic groups shared similarities in symptoms of general anxiety and anhedonia. Anhedonia and general anxiety were the 72
only measures that were Independent of clinical depression status in bulimia nervosa patients suggesting that the dual diagnosis of depression with bulimia nervosa had no affect on these two symptoms
for the nondepressed bulimia nervosa patients.
Although nondepressed bulimics evidenced moderate cognitive dysfunction, the depressed bulimics' dysfunction was significantly more severe.
Differences in signs and symptoms across these groups argue against the hypothesis of a unitary
affective or anxiety disorder underlying bulimia
nervosa. Instead, these data suggest that
nondepressed bulimia nervosa patients experience some
of the same problems reported by depressed or anxiety
patients, (i.e., trait anxiety, anhedonia, and
cognitive dysfunction). They did not, however, report
other problems common to depression or anxiety, (i.e.,
somatic complaints, state anxiety, obsessiveness).
Treatment implications. The combined results from
both hypothesis one and hypothesis two may help
explain some of the current inconsistencies in the
bulimia nervosa treatment outcome research. The
literature is inconclusive concerning the
effectiveness of frequently used treatment components. 73
The debate includes three basic treatment modalities which include (1) antidepressant medication (cf.
Hudson, Pope, & Jonas (1986), (2) exposure with
response prevention (cf. Wilson, Rossiter, Kleifeld, &.
Lindholm, 1986), and (3) cognitive-behavioral (cf.
Agras, Schneider, Arnow, Raeburn, & Telch, 1989).
Although studies vary in their outcomes, reports of
patients remaining abstinent from purging activity at
six-month follow-up range from 20 to 60 percent. The most frequent abstinent rate reported has been around
40 percent (Freeman, Barry, Dunkeld-Turnbul1, &
Henderson, 1988; Kirkley et a l ., 1985; Pope et al.,
1983; White & Boskind-White, 1981). When comparing
treatment outcome of E/RP, cognitive-behavioral, and
antidepressants it is uncertain which program has been most effective.
What is not clear from any of the treatment
outcome studies are the patient characteristics
associated with improvement following interventions
using different treatment components. From the
results of this study it could be postulated that the
depression status of the patient could have affected
the outcome of treatment studies.
The results of the current study suggest that 74
there may be a subgroup of bulimia nervosa patients that are clinically depressed and might benefit from antidepressant medications plus E/RP and cognitive- behavioral treatment that is both specific to eating/weight related problem areas and noneating/nonweight problem areas. In this study, bulimia nervosa patients with depression were clearly different from patients that were not depressed.
Failure to address these differences in treatment could help explain the high relapse rate
(approximately 60 to 70 percent) in bulimia nervosa patients.
Research has suggested that depressed patients continue to improve following therapy, while bulimia nervosa patients tend to relapse. Keller, Herzog,
Lavori, Bridges, Ott, and Klerman (1986) reported a 35 percent recovery rate at six months for bulimic patients compared to 64 percent at six months for depressed patients. The probability of full recovery from unipolar depression has been reported to range from 42 percent at three months to 79 percent at two years (Keller, 1985). Of particular interest is that out of the 60 percent of bulimic patients also classified with depression only one patient had 75
recovered from both disorders at six months follow-up
(Keller et al., 1986). This low recovery rate may be explained by the results of this study. The dual diagnosed patients in this study were found to be more disturbed than nondepressed bulimics. It may not only be useful to design more comprehensive treatment of the depressed bulimia nervosa patient, but also to design interventions of longer duration to overcome both bulimia nervosa and depression.
Future Directions
Since this was the first study to compare nondepressed and depressed bulimia nervosa patients, these findings need to be replicated and extended.
Differences in the symptom profiles of bulimia nervosa patients in this study and the symptom profiles presented by Cooper and Fairburn (1986) could be explained by hypotheses independent of the presence or absence of depression in bulimia nervosa. First, different methods were used; the former authors used a structured interview format to establish the presence/absence and severity of symptoms. Secondly, since different measures were used, it is possible that variations of similar dimensions rather than the same dimensions (e.g., pessimistic thought versus 76
dysfunctional cognitions) were actually measured.
Lastly, duration of the disorder was not controlled in
either study. Perhaps depressed bulimia nervosa patients develop depression due to the chronic, cyclic
nature of the eating disorder. Directionality is also an issue. These patients could also develop depression due to the situational anxiety and
obsessiveness they experience or develop situational
anxiety and obsessiveness due to the depression they
experience.
These data suggest that research continue to
address the development of depression in bulimia
nervosa as well as treatment for bulimia nervosa
patients with and without clinical depression.
Unanswered questions are whether (a) treating
situational anxiety, obsessions, and cognitive
dysfunction associated with and independent of eating
situations in the depressed bulimia nervosa patients
and (b) treating both eating and noneating related general anxiety in all bulimia nervosa patients will
increase the improvement rate.
Another area for further investigation is
cognitive dysfunction. There has been an abundance of
clinical observation and anecdotal information 77
suggesting that bulimics suffer from maladaptive cognitions. The presence of dysfunctional cognitions related to eating disorder symptoms in bulimia nervosa patients has been supported (Scanlon, Ollendick, &
Bayer, 1986), however, more general cognitive dysfunction in bulimia has yet to be empirically validated. In a recent review of cognitions and bulimia ReynaMcGlone and Ollendick (1989) suggested several questions that need to be addressed: (1) do bulimics evidence cognitive errors, (2) if yes, to what extent, (3) are they exclusive to weight related concerns (4) if not, what are the other areas, and (5) are they distinguishable from depressives and normals?
The results from this study help answer some of those questions. First, bulimics obtained scores on the DAS indicative of clinical levels of cognitive dysfunction. Second, dysfunction appears to be mild to moderate unless the bulimic is also clinically depressed. The third and fourth questions asked by
ReynaMcGlone and Ollendick (1989) can only be partially addressed by these results. Although the cognitive dysfunctions do not appear to be only related to weight concerns, it is unclear whether the depressed bulimics were experiencing different 78
dysfunctions, more dysfunctions at similar severity levels, or similar dysfunctions at higher severity levels. Lastly, scores on the DAS suggest that bulimics are distinguishable from normal subjects but not from depressed patients. It is evident from these results that further research into the cognitive dysfunction of the bulimia nervosa population is needed to clarify the relationship between bulimia, depression, and cognitive dysfunction.
Summary
The data from this study support previous research arguing against the affective variant hypothesis.
Nondepressed and depressed bulimia nervosa patients achieved different symptom profiles. The results of this study also expanded upon the anxiety model.
Nondepressed bulimics and depressed bulimics also reported different anxiety symptom profiles. In addition to different profiles on both depression and anxiety measures, bulimics who were clinically depressed were more disturbed than bulimics who were not diagnosed with depressive disorder. Depression clearly was the important variable affecting the dependent measures. There were several correlations between depression and secondary psychopathology but 79
no correlation between bulimia nervosa and secondary psychopatho1ogy.
These results call for further research investigating the development of depression in bulimia nervosa. Another important area needing further research is the cognitive dysfunction associated with bulimia nervosa. It is also suggested that research investigating treatment outcome report the relationship between outcome and the depression status of the bulimia nervosa patient. It may be that choices of treatment for bulimia nervosa patients are dependent upon whether they are also clinically depressed. Standard treatments for eating disordered patients may be acceptable for the nondepressed bulimic, however, the depressed bulimic may require the addition of other treatment components and longer treatment duration. References
Abraham, S. F., & Beaumont, P. J. V. (1982). How
patients describe bulimia or binge eating.
Psychological_Medicine, 12, 625-635.
Agras, W. S. (1987). Counterpoint: The case for
behavioral therapy. K. D. Brownell (Chair)
Pharmacotherapy vs. behavior therapy for bulimia.
Symposium presented at 21st.. Annual Meeting of
Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy,
Boston, Massachusetts.
Agras, W. S., Dorian, B., Kirkley, B. G., Arnow, B., &
Bachman, J. (1987). Imipramine in the treatment of
bulimia: A double-blind controlled study.
International Journal of Eating Disorders. 6^
29-38.
Agras, W. S., &. McCann, U. (1987). The efficacy and
role of antidepressants in the treatment of bulimia
nervosa. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 9, 18-22.
Agras, W. S., Schneider, J. A., Arnow, B., Raeburn,
S.D, &. Telch, C. F. (1989). Cognitive-behavioral
and response-prevention treatments for bulimia
nervosa. Journal of Consuling and Clinical
Psychology. 57. 215-221.
Altshuler, K. Z., & Weiner, M. F. (1985). Anorexia
80 81
nervosa and depression: A dissenting view.
American Journal of Psychiatry. 142, 328-332.
American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic
and Statistical Manaual of Mental Disorders (3rd.
Ed.). Washington, D. C.: Author.
American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd.
E d .-Revised). Washington, D. C.: Author.
Anshensel, C. S., Clark, V. A., & Frerichs, R. R.
(1983). Race, ethnicity, and depression: A
confirmatory analysis. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology. 4 4 . 385-398.
Barrios, B. A., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1982). Buiimia
nervosa: a conceptual mode 1. Presented at the
Association for the Advancement of Behavior
Therapy, Los Angeles.
Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Clinical,
experimental, and theoretical aspects.
Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Beck, A. T. (1974). The development of depression: A
cognitive model. In R. Friedman & M. Katz (Eds.),
Psychology of depression: Contemporary theory and
research (pp. 3-28). Washington, D. C.: Winston
Wiley. 82
Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the
emotional disorders. New York: International
Universities Press.
Beck, A. T. (1978). Depression Inventory.
Philadelphia: Center for Cognitive Therapy.
Beck, A. T . , Ward, C. H . , Mendelson, M . , Mock, J., &
Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring
depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4,
561-571.
Bertelson, A., Harvald, B., & Hauge, M. (1977). A
Danish twin study of manic-depressive disorders.
British Journal of Psychiatry, 130. 330-351.
Birch, B. A. (1985). Diagnostic limitations of DST
test in screening for depression. Southern Medical
Journal. 78, 16-19.
Boskind-Lodahl, M . , & White, W. (1978). The
definition and treatment of bulimiarexia in college
women-A pilot study. Journal of American
College Health Association, 27, 84-97.
Boyd, J. H . , & Weissman, M. M. (1981). Epidemiology
of affective disorders. Archives of General
Psychiatry, 34, 98-111.
Burrows, B. A., Ribordy, S. C., & Johnson, C. (1989).
Interoceptive awareness and coping among bulimic 83
and normal women. Annual meeting of the Society of
Behavioral Medicine, San Francisco.
Cadoret, R. J., & Winokur, G. (1974). Depression in
alcoholism. Annals of the New York Academy of
Sciences. 233, 34-39.
Carroll, B. J., Feinberg, M . , &. Greden, J. F. (1981).
A specific laboratory test for the diagnosis of
melancholia: Standardization, validation, and
clinical utility. Archives of General Psychiatry.
38, 15-22.
Carson, T. P., & Carson, R. C. (1984). The affective
disorders. In H. E. Adams & P . B. Sutker (Eds.)
Comprehensive Handbook of Psychopathology (pp 369).
New York: Plenum.
Cooper, P. J., & Fairburn, C. G. (1983). Binge eating
and self-induced vomiting in the community: A
preliminary study. British Journal of Psychiatry.
142. 139-144.
Cooper, P. J., & Fairburn, C. G. (1986). The
depressive symptoms of bulimia nervosa. British
Journal of Psychiatry. 148. 268-274.
Crisp, A., Kalucy, R., Lacey, J., & Harding, B.
(1977). The long-term prognosis in anorexia
nervosa: Some factors predictive of outcome. In 84
R. Vigersky (Ed.) Anorexia Nervosa. New York:
Raven Press.
Davis, J. M . , & Sharma, R. P. (1986). Biological
treatment of affective disorders. In P. A. Berger
S. K. H. Brodie (Eds.) American Handbook of
Psychiatry, 2nd, ed.. Vol. 8 (p. 326). New York:
Basic Books, Inc.
Davis, R., Freeman, R . , & Solyom, L. (1985). Mood and
food: An analysis of bulimic episodes. Journal of
Psychiatric Research. 19. 331-335.
Derogatis, L. R. (1977). Manual for the Symptom
Checklist-90. Baltimore: John Hopkins University
School of Medicine.
Dobson, K. S., & Breiter, H. J. (1983). Cognitive
assessment of depression: Reliability and validity
of three measures. Journal of Abnormal Psycholocry.
92, 107-109.
Eaves, G., & Rush, A. J. (1984). Cognitive patterns
in symptomatic and remitted unipolar major
depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93,
31-40.
Endicott, J., & Spitzer, R. L. (1978). A diagnostic
interview: The Schedule for Affective Disorders and
Schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry. 85
35, 837-844.
Fairburn, C. G. (1983). Bulimia nervosa. British
Journal of Hospital Medicine. 29, 537-542.
Fairburn, C. G., & Cooper, P. J. (1982). Self-induced
vomiting and bulimia nervosa. British Journal of
Psychiatry. 144, 238-246.
Fairburn, C. G., & Cooper, P. J. (1982). Self-induced
vomiting and bulimia nervosa: An undetected
problem. British Medical Journal. 284. 1153-1155.
Fairburn, C. G., & Garner, D. M. (1986). The
diagnosis of bulimia nervosa. International
Journal of Eating Disorders. 5, 403-419.
Fava, G. A. (1983). Assessing depressive symptoms
across cultures: Italian validation of the CES-D
self-rating scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology.
39, 249-251.
Fichter, M. M. , Pirhe, K. M . , & Holsboer, F. (1986).
Weight loss causes neuroendocrine disturbances:
Experimental study in healthy starving subjects.
Psychiatry Research. 17, 61-72.
Freeman, C., Barry, F., Dunkeld-Turnbul1, J., &
Henderson, A. (1988). Controlled trial of
psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa. British Medical
Journal. 296. 521-525. 86
Gallagher, D., Nies, G., & Thompson, L. W. (1982).
Reliability of the Beck Depression Inventory with
older adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psycho logy. 50, 152-153.
Gerner, R. H . , & Bunney, W. E. Jr. (1986). Biological
hypotheses of affective disorders. In P. A. Burger
& K. H. Brodie (Eds.) American Handbook of
Psychiatry. 2nd, e d .. Vol. 8 . New York: Basic
Books.
Gittleson, N. (1966). The effect of obsessions on
depressive pscyhosis. British Journal of
Psychiatry. 112, 253-259.
Golin, S., Sweeney, P. D., & Shaeffer, D. E. (1981).
The causality of causal attributions in depression:
A cross-lagged panel correlation analysis. Journal
of Abnormal Psychology. 90, 521-530.
Guiora, A. Z., (1967). Dysorexia: A
psychopathological study of anorexia nervosa and
bulimia. American Journal of Psychiatry. 124,
391-393.
Gwirtsman, E. H . , Roy-Byrne, P., Yager, J., & Gerner,
R. H. (1983). Neuroendocrine abnormalities in
bulimia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140,
559-563. 87
Hamilton, E. W . , & Abramson, L. Y. (1983). Cognitive
patterns and major depressive disorders: A
longitudinal study in a hospital setting. Journal
of Abnormal Psycholocrv. 92, 173-184.
Hammen, C., & Krantz, S. E. (1985). Measures of
psychological processes in depression. In E. E.
Beckham &. W. R. Leber (Eds.) Handbook of
Depression: Treatment, assesssment. and research
(pp.423). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
Hammen, C., Krantz, 3. E.. &. Cochran, S. D. (1981).
Relationships between depression and causal
attributions about stressful life events.
Cognitive Therapy and Research. 5, 351-358.
Hatsukami, D., Eckert, E., Mitchell, J. E., & Pyle, R.
(1984). Affective disorders and substance abuse in
women with bulimia. Psychological Medicine. 23.,
701-704.
Hatsukami, D., Owen, P., Pyle, R. , &. Mitchell, J.
(1982). Similarities and differences on the MMPI
between women with bulimia and women with alcohol
or drug abuse problem. Addictive Behaviors. 7,
435-439.
Herzog, D. B. (1982). Bulimia: The secretive
syndrome. Psychosomatics. 23., 481-487. 88
Herzog, D. B. (1984). Are anorexic and bulimic
patients depressed? American Journal
of Psychiatry, 141, 1594-1597.
Hinz, L. D . , & Williamson, D. A. (1987). Bulimia and
depression: A review of the affective variant
hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin. 102, 150-158.
Hodgson, R. J., &. Rachman, S. (1977). Obsessional-
compulsive complaints. Behavious Research and
Therapy. 15. 389-395.
Hollon, S. D., & Beck, A. T. (1979). Cognitive
therapy of depression. In P. C. Kendall & S. D.
Hollon (Eds.) Cognitive-behavioral interventions:
Theory. Research, and procedures (pp. 153-204).
New York: Academic Press.
Hudson, J. I., Laffer, P. S.. & Pope, H. G. (1982).
Bulimia related to affective disorder by family
history and response to the desamethasone
suppression test. American Journal of Psychiatry,
139. 685-687.
Hudson, J. I., Pope, H. G., & Jonas, J. M. (1986).
Antidepressant treatment of bulimia. Advances in
Behaviour Research and Therapy. 7, 173-179.
Hudson, J. I., Pope, H. G., Jonas, J. M . , Laffer, P.
S., Hudson, M. S., & Melby, J. C. (1983). 89
Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis hyperactivity
in bulimia. Psychiatry Research. 8, 111-117.
Hudson, J. I., Pope, H. G., Jonas, J. M . , & Yurgelun
Todd, D. (1983). Family history study of anorexia
nervosa and bulimia. British Journal of
Psychiatry. 142, 133-138.
Hughes, P. L . , Wells, L. A., Cunningham, C. J., &
Ilstrup. D. M. (1986). Treating bulimia with
desipramine: A double-blind, placebo-controlled
study. Archives of General Psychiatry. 43,
182-186.
Janata, J. W . , Klonoff, E. A., & Ginsberg, A. J.
(1985). Psychophysio logical arousal and urges to
binge and purge in adolescent bulimics monitored in
vivo. Presented at the Annual Meeting Association
for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Houston.
Jarrell, M. P., Johnson, W. G., & Williamson, D. A.
(1986). Insulin and glucose responses in the
binge/purge episode of bulimic women. Presented at
the Annual Meeting Association for Advancement of
Behavior Therapy, Chicago.
Johnson, C. (1985). Initial consultation for patients
with bulimia and anorexia nervosa. In D. M. Garner
& P. E. Garfinkel (Eds.) Handbook of psychotherapy 90
for anorexia nervosa and bulimia (pp. 19). New
York: Guilford Press.
Johnson, C., Larson, R. (1982). Bulimia: An analysis
of moods and behavior. Psvchosomatic Medicine. 44,
341-351.
Johnson, C., Stuckey, M. K . , Lewis, L. D., & Schwartz,
D. M. (1983). Bulimia: A descriptive study of 316
cases. International Journal of Eating Disorders.
2, 3-16.
Jonas, J. M. , Pope, H. G., &. Hudson, J. I. (1983).
Treatment of bulimia with monoamine oxidase
inhibitors. Journal of Clinical
Psychopharmaco 1 ocrv . 3, 59-60.
Katz. J. L. (1987). Eating disorder and affective
disorder: Relatives or merely chance acquaintances?
Comprehensive Psychiatry. 28, 220-228.
Keefe, F. J. (1982). Behavioral assessment and
treatment of chronic pain: Current status and
future directions. Journal of Consulting
and Clinical Psychology. 50. 896-911.
Keller, M. B. (1985). Chronic and recurrent affective
disorders: Incidence, course, and influencing
factors. In D. Kemali &. G. Racagni (Eds.) Chronic
treatments in neurophychiatrv (pp. 111-120). 91
New York: Raven Press.
Keller, M. B., Herzog, D. B., Lavorl, P. W . , Bridges,
A., Ott, I., & Klerman, G. L. (1986). One-year
course of bulimia and affective disorder.
Presented at the Annual Meeting of American
Psychiatric Association, Washington, D. C.
Kirkley, B. G., Schneider, J. A., Agras, W. S., &
Bachman, J. A. (1985). Comparison of two group
treatments of bulimia. Journal of Consulting and
Clinical Psychology, 53. 43-48.
Klerman, G. L. (1980). Overview of affective
disorders. In H. Kaplan, A. Freedman, & B. J.
Sadock (Eds.) Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry
(3rd. e d .) (pp. 1305-1319). Baltimore: Williams
& Wilkins.
Kringlen, E. (1965). Obsessional neurotics: A long
term follow-up. British Journal of Psychiatry.
Ill. 709-722.
Leber, W. R. , Beckham, E. E. , &. Danker-Brown, P.
(1985). Diagnostic criteria for depression. In E.
E. Beckham & W. R. Leber (Eds.) Handbook of
depression: Treatment, assessment, and research
(pp. 363). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
Leckman, J. F., Weissman, M. M . , Merikangas, K. R., 92
Pauls, D. L., & Prusoff, B. A. (1983). Paranoid
disorders and major depression. Archives of
General Psychiatry. 40, 1055-1060.
Lee, N. F., Rush, A. J., & Mitchell, J. E. (1985).
Bulimia and depression. Journal of Affective
Disorders. 9_, 231-238.
Lehmann, H. E. (1983). The clinician's view of
anxiety and depression. Journal of
Clinical Psychiatry. 44, 3-7.
Lehmann, L. (1985). The relationship of depression to
other DSM-III Axis I disorders. In E. E. Beckham &
W. R. Leber (Eds.) Handbook of Depression:
Treatment, assessment, and research (pp. 671).
Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
Leitenberg, H . , Gross, J., Peterson, J., & Rosen,
J. C. (1984). Analysis of an anxiety model and the
process of change during exposure plus response
prevention treatment of bulimia nervosa. Behavior
Therapy. 15, 3-20.
Lewinsohn, P. M. (1974). A behavioral approach to
depression. In F. J. Friedman & M. M. Katz (Eds.)
The Psychology of Depression: Contemporary theory
and research (pp. 157-185). New York: Halstead.
Lewinsohn, P. M . , & Graf, M. (1973). Pleasant 93
activities and depression. Journal of Consulting
and Clinical Psychology. 41, 261-268.
Lewinsohn, P. M. , & Libet, J. (1972). Pleasant
events, activity schedules, and depression.
Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 79, 291-295.
Lewinsohn, P. M . , & MacPhillamy, D. J. (1974). The
relationship between age and engagement in pleasant
activities. Journal of Gerontology. 29. 290-294.
Lindy, D. C., Walsh, B. T . , Roose, S. P., Gladis, M . ,
&. Glassman, A. H. (1985). The dexamethasone
suppression test in bulimia. American Journal of
Psychiatry. 142. 1375-1376.
MacPhillamy, D. J., & Lewinsohn, P. M. (1972). The
Pleasant Events Schedule. Unpublished manuscript.
MacPhillamy, D. J.. & Lewinsohn, P. M. (1974).
Depression as a function of levels of desired and
obtained pleasure. Journal of Abnormal Psychology.
83_, 651-657.
MacPhillamy, D. J., &. Lewinsohn, P. M. (1982). The
Pleasant Events Schedule: Studies on reliability,
validity, and scale intercorrelation. Journal of
Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 50, 363-380.
Mendels, J. (1983). Eating disorders and
antidepressants. Journal of Clinical 94
Psychopharmaco 1 ocrv. 3, 59.
Mitchell, J. E., & Groat, R. (1984). A placebo
controlled, double-blind trial of amitriptyline in
bulimia. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacolocry.
4, 186-193.
Mitchell, J. E., Hatsukami, D., Eckert, E. D., & Pyle,
R. L. (1985). Characteristics of 275 patients with
bulimia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142,
482-485.
Mizes, J. S. (1985). Bulimia: A review of its
symptomatology and treatment. Advances in
Behaviour Research and Therapy. 7, 91-142.
Moore, D. C. (1977). Amitriptyline therapy in
anorexia nervosa. American Journal of Psychiatry.
134. 1303-1304.
Montgomery, S. A., &. Asberg, M. (1979). A new
depression scale designed to be sensitive to
change. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134.
382-389.
Munjack, D. J., & Moss, H. B. (1981). Affective
disorder and alcoholism in families of
agoraphobics. Archives of General Psychiatry. 38,
869-871.
O'Hara, M. W . , Rehm, L. P., & Campbell. S. B. (1982). 95
Predicting depressive symptomatology: Cognitive-
behavioral models and postpartum depression.
Journal of Abnormal Psycholocrv. 91. 457-461.
Orme, J. G., Reis, J., & Herz, E. J. (1986).
Factorial and discriminant validity of the Center
for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D)
Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 42, 28-33.
Palmer, R. (1979). The dietary chaos syndrome: A
useful new term? British Journal of Medical
Psychology. 52. 187-190.
Pope, H. G., & Hudson, J. I. (1986). Antidepressant
drug therapy for bulimia: Current status. Journal
of Clinical Psychiatry. 4 7 , 339-345.
Pope, H. G., & Hudson, J. I. (1982). Treatment of
bulimia with antidepressants. Psychopharmaco1oqy.
78, 176-179.
Pope, H. G., Hudson, J. I., Jonas, J. M. , &. Yurgelun-
Todd, D. (1983). Bulimia treated with imipramine:
A placebo controlled, double-blind study. American
Journal of Psychiatry. 140. 554-558.
Prather, R. C., & Williamson, D. A. (1988). The
psychopathology associated with eating disorders.
International Journal of Eating Disorders. 7,
177-184. 96
Pyle, R. L., Mitchell, J. E., & Eckert, E. D. (1981).
Bulimia: A report of 34 cases. Journal of Clinical
Psychiatry. 42, 60-64.
Pyle, R. L . , Mitchell, J. E . , Eckert, E. D.,
Halvorson, P. A., Neuman, P. A., & Goff, G. M.
(1983). The incidence of bulimia in freshman
college students. International Journal of
Eating Disorders. 2, 75-85.
Rachman, S., &. Hodgson, R. J. (1980). Obsessions and
Compulsions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hal1.
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report
depression scale for research in the general
population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1,
385-401.
Rau, J. H . , & Green, R. S. (1975). Compulsive eating:
A neurophychologic approach to certain eating
disorders. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 3, 223-231.
ReynaMcGlone, C. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (1989).
Cognition and bulimia nervosa. In W. G. Johnson
(Ed) Advances in eating disorders. Bulimia nervosa:
Perspectives on clinical research and therapy
(pp. 91-118). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.
Rich, C. L. (1978). Self-induced vomiting:
Psychiatric considerations. Journal of American 97
Medical Association. 239. 2688-2689.
Riskind, J. H . , Beck, A. T . , & Smucker, M. R. (1983).
Psychometric properties of the Dysfunctional
Attitude Scale in a clinical population. Presented
at the Meeting of the World Congress on Behavior
Therapy, Washington, D.C.
Roberts, R. E. (1980). Reliability of the CES-D Scale
in different ethnic contexts. Psychiatry Research.
2, 125-134.
Rosen, J. C., &. Leitenberg, J. (1982). Bulimia
nervosa: Treatment with exposure and response
prevention. Behavior Therapy. 13, 117-124.
Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (1984). Components of
depressed mood in married men and women: The
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale.
American Journal of Epidemiology. 119, 997-1004.
Roy-Byrne, P., Gwirtsman, H . . & Edelstein, C. K.
(1983). Eating disorders and antidepressants.
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 3, 60-61.
Russell, G. (1979). Bulimia nervosa: An ominous
variant of anorexia nervosa. Psychological
Medicine. £, 429-448.
Russell, G. (1983). Anorexia nervosa and bulimia
nervosa. In G. F. M. Russell & L. Hersov (Eds.) 98
Handbook of Psychiatry. Vol. 4: The neuroses and
personality disorders (pp. 285-298). Cambridge,
Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press.
Sabine, E. J., Yonance. A., Farrington, A. J.,
Barratt, K. H . , &. Wake ling, A. (1983). Bulimia
nervosa: A placebo-controlled, double-blind
therapeutic trial of mianserin. British Journal
of Clinical Pharmacology. 15. 195s-202s.
Scanlon, E. M. , Ollendick, T. H . , & Bayer, K. (1986).
The role of cocrnitions in bulimia: An empirical
test of basic assumptions. Pressented at the
Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy,
Chicago, IL.
Scott, R. L., & Baroffio, J. R. (1986). An MMPI
analysis of similarities and differences in three
classifications of eating disorders: Anorexia
nervosa, bulimia, and morbid obesity. Journal of
Clinical Psychology. 42, 708-713.
Shader, R. I., &Greenblat, D. J. (1982). The
psychiatrist as mind sweeper. Journal of Clinical
Psvchopharaco1oqy. 2, 233-234.
Shaw, B. F., Vallis, T. M . , & McCabe, S. B. (1985).
The assessment of the severity and symptom patterns
in depression. In E. E. Beckham & W. R. Leber 99
(Eds.) Handbook of depression: Treatment,
assessment. and research (pp. 384). Homewood, IL:
Dorsey Press.
Smith, M . , & Thelen, M. (1984). Development and
validation of a test for bulimia. Journal of
Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 52. 863-872.
Smith, S. R . , Bledsoe, T . , & Chetri, M. K. (1975).
Cortisol metabolism and the pituitary-adrenal axis
in adults with protein-calorie malnutrition.
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism.
40, 43-52.
Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait
Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting
Psychologists Press.
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. G.
(1970). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto,
CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J., & Robins, E. (1978).
Research diagnostic criteria: Rationale and
reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36,
773-782.
Stahl, S. M, & Kravitz, K. D. (1986). A critical
review of the use of laboratory tests in psychiatry
disorders. In P. A. Berger &K. H. Brodie (Eds.) 100
American Handbook of Psychiatry (2nd, ed.) Vol. 8
(pp. 1054). New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Stern, S. L . , Dixon, K. N . , Nemzer, E., Lake, M. D.,
Sansone, R. A., Smetlzer, D. J., Lantz, S., &
Schrier, S. S. (1984). Affective disorder in the
families of women with normal weight bulimia.
American Jouranl of Psychiatry. 141. 1224-1227.
Strober, M . , Green, J., & Carlson, G. (1981). Utility
of the Beck Depression Inventory with
psychiatrically hospitalized adolescents. Journal
of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 4 9 , 482-483.
Strober, M. , & Katz, J. L. (1987). Do eating
disorders and affective disorders share a common
etiology? A dissenting opinion. International
Journal of Eating Disorders. 6, 171-180.
Sturgis, E. T. (1984). Obsessional and compulsive
disorders. In H. LE. Adams & P. B. Sutker (Eds.)
Comprehensive Handbook of Psychopathology (p. 258).
New York: Plenum Press.
Swift, W. , Andrews, D. , &. Barklage, N. (1986). The
relationship between affective disorder and eating
disorders: A review of the literature. American
Journal of Psychiatry. 143, 290-299.
Walsh, B. T., Roose, S. P., Glassman, A. H . , Gladis, 101
M. , & Sadik, C. (1985). Bulimia and depression.
Psychosomatic Medicine. 47, 123-131.
Walsh, B. T . , Stewart, J. W . , Wright, L., Harrison,
W . , Roose, S. P., & Glassman, A. H. (1982).
Treatment of bulimia with monoamine oxidase
inhibitors. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139,
1629-1630.
Walsh, B. T . , Stewart, J. W. , Roose, S. P., Gladis,
M . , & Glassman, A. H. (1984). Treatment of bulimia
with phenelzine: A double-blind, placebo-controlled
study. Archives of General Psychiatry. 43,
1105-1109.
Weiss, S. R . , & Ebert, M. H. (1983). Psychological
and behavioral characteristics of normal-weight
bulimics and normal-weight controls.
Psychosomat ic Medi cine. 4 5 , 293-303.
Weissman, A. N. (1979). The Dysfunctional Attitude
Scale: A validation study. Doctoral dissertation.
University of Pennsylvania.
Weissman, A. N . , & Beck, A. T. (1978). Development
and validation of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale:
A preliminary investicration■ Paper presented at
the Meeting of the American Educational Research
Association, Toronto, Canada. 102
White, W. C., & Boskind-White, M. (1981). An
experiential-behavioral approach to the treatment
of bulimarexia. Psychotherapy Theory. Research,
and Practice. 18, 501-507.
Williamson, D. A., Goreczny, A. J., Davis, C. J.,
Ruggiero, L., & McKenzie, S. J. (1988).
Psychophysiological analysis of the anxiety model
of bulimia nervosa. Behavior Therapy. 19. 1-10.
Williamson, D. A., Kelley, M. L., Davis, C. J.,
Ruggiero, L., & Blouin, D. C. (1985).
Psychopathology of eating disorders: A controlled
comparison of bulimic, obese, and normal subjects.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53,
161-166.
Williamson, D. A., Prather, R. C., Goreczny, A. J.,
Davis, C. J., & McKenzie, S. J. (1989). A
comprehensive model of bulimia nervosa: Empirical
evaluation. In W. G. Johnson (Ed.) Advances in
Eating Disorders (pp. 137-156). Greenwich, CT:
JAI Press, Inc.
Williamson, D. A., Prather, R. C., Upton, L., Davis,
C. J., Ruggiero, L., & VanBuren, D. (1987).
Severity of bulimia: Relationship with depression
and other psychopathology. International Journal 103
of Eating Disorders. 6, 39-47.
Wilson, G. T, Rossiter, E., Kleifeld, E. I., &
Lindholm, L. (1986). Cognitive-behavioral
treatment of bulimia nervosa: A controlled
evaluation. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 24.
177-188.
Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E., & Sartorius, N. (1974).
The measurement and classification of pschiatric
symptoms. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge
University Press.
World Health Organization (1978). Mental disorders:
Glossary and guide to their classification in
accordance with the ninth revision of the
International Classification of Diseases. Geneva:
Author. APPENDICES
A through L
Assessment Measures
104 Appendix A
Demographic Questionnaire 106
Identifying and Demographic Information
S e a M « l( O female (_J A|« ____
Race (Chech one)
White a oi«kO oiim (Specify) G
M ailtal Slatua (Chech one)
PicienHy In lin t marriage a Divorced and p « K n ilf temerrled a Divorced 01 teparaicd and not prctcntly rem arried a Widowed and ftfirn llf fforarrled a Widowed and not ptetently rem arried a
M (*ti mauled a
What It your picKnt piim njr tolc! (Check one)
W i(« earner LJ llvuicw ilc LI) S t y d c r r l LI) • Other (Specify) U
llighctt Occupational level attained Check one for each permo Stir r.u.«. Muttxi S|t|l»K
Higher eaecullve. ptopticlot o f large concern. a a a □ Major proferiinnal
Dujineii manager of Ii«;c concern.ptopfielot of a a □ a medium tiled builncit.Icttct p tblttiio nil
A dm iflliliilU f pcttunnel. owner of itttall Independent □ a □ □ buiinctt. mlnof ptofeitiunal. owner of large faint
Clerical or tal(t « u il« , technician, ownct of little □ □ □ □ buiinctt.owner ol medium tired fatnt
Shilled manual employee, ownct o f email butlncit □ a □ a
Machine operator, tcm ltklllcd employee, tenant □ □ □ a faimct who o»nt little equipment
Unthlllcd employee, tharctoppci □ o □ o Doe I not apply (Ne*et worked In paid em ploym ent) a a a □ Duet not apply (No ipouac| a a a a Inform ation not available □ □ □ □ 107
C uiicrtf liW n| a<«angcn«cnl (Check otic)
W ith Patents ot
1k * t m o« SIu k J ipulm ttil will* Filtnd a
f«**ij**(tt (| A lo n e a each peiioo lligheit level of education Check one fot S p o u ie S e lf f a t h e r M o lh c t □ Completed pm l-|ii Attended college. Im l didn’t teceive □ foui yen academic degtcc □ □ □ Completed high school; may have attended ot completed lu d c school at otliet nan-academic Staining teepiittng high school com pletion a a a a Attended high iclioot □ o □ □ Completed pam nui school (flth giade I a a a a Attended giammat scIm m iI a a □ □ Ho schooling a □ a a ID (ktet not apply (Hosj*«Mttc| a a C) Infoim atton not available (Specify why) a □ □ □ 108 Appendix B Diagnostic Interview for Bulimia Nervosa 109 DIAGNOSTIC INTERVIEW FOR BULIMIA NERVOSA Have you ever been an a diet? Y e s __ N o ____ At what age did you begin to restrict your food intake due to concern over your body size? ______years old Over the last year how often have you begun a diet? ______number of times Have you ever had a episode of eating a large amount of food in a short period of time Y es N o ____ How old were you when you binged for the first time? ______years old How characteristic are the following of your binge eating? Nevei— Rare! y~Someti rues-Of ten—A1 ways Consuming a large amount of food N R S 0 A Eating very rapidly N R S 0 A Feeling out of control N R S 0 A Feel ,down or annoyed afterward N R S □ A Get uncontrollable urges to eat until physically ill N R S 0 A Binge eat in private N R S 0 A Within the last three months, what has been your average number of binge episodes per week? ______Number of binges/week Have you ever vomi ted or spit out food after eating in order to avoid weight gain? Y e s N o ____ How old were you when you induced vomiting for the first time? _Years old 110 10- ‘Have you ever used laxatives or diuretics to control your weight or “get rid of faod”? Yes N o ____ 11. How aid were you when you first tool: 1 a.'jat i ves/di uret i cs for weight control 7 ______Years old 12- During the entire last month, what is the average frequency that you have engaged in the following bnhavi or u to control weight? Dinge eating: Never-- 1 /Month — > 1 /Month — 1 / Wee!: — > 1 / Week — 1 / Day — > 1 / Day Self-induced vomiting: Never 1/Month — >1/Month — 1/Week — >I/Week — I/Day— >1/Day Laxative use: Never 1/Month— >1/Month — 1/Week — >1/Week — 1/Day— >1/Day Use of diet pills: Never-- 1/Month — >1/Month — 1/Week — >1/Week— 1/Day— >1/Day Use of enemas: Never I/Month — >I/Month— 1/Week — >1/Week — 1/Day— >1/Day Exere i se: Never 1 /Month — > 1 /Month — 1 / Week — >1 / Week — 1 / Day— > 1 / Day Fasti ng: Never— 1/Month— >1/Month— 1/Week— >I/Week— 1/Day— >1/Day 13. How many minutes a day do you currently exercise (including going on walks, riding bicycle, etc.)? Minutes Ill 14. Weight History Current weight______lbs. Current height______finches Desired weight______lbs. Adult Years Highest adult weight since age 1G______lbs. at__ age______ Lowest adult weight since age 1G______lbs. at__a go______ Mow long did you remain at your lowest adult weight? ______days __ ___m o n t h s ______years Adolescent years Highest weight between ages 12—1G ______lbs. at age______ Lowest weight between ages 12—18______lbs- at age______ 15. Childhood Mow did you perceive your weight as a child between ages 6—12 years old? Very thin— Somewhat thin— Normal— Somewhat overwt.— Very overwt. 16. At your current weight do you feel that you are: Very thin— Somewhat thin— Normal — Somewhat overwt- — Very overwt- 17. Mow much does a two pound weight gain affect your feelings about yours e l f 7 Ex tremel y— Very much— Noderat el y— SI i ght 1 y— Not at all How much does a two pound weight igss affect your feelings about yours e l f 7 Extremely— Very much— Moderately— Slightly— Not at all 112 10- How much does a five pound weight gai_n affect your feelings about y ourselfV Extremely— Very much— Moderately— Slightly— Not at all How much does a five pound weight l.gss affect your feelings about y ourself? E>: tremel y— Very much— Moder a tel y— SI i gh 11 y— Not at all 17. Has there ever been a time when your feelings about yourself or your social life have changed substantial1y as a result of losinq weight? Y e s ______N o ______ If the answer is yes — Please tell me about it. 20- ! !c‘»* cftr" do you «•' vnur^pl f *? More than daily Daily More than weekly ____ Weekly Monthly Less than monthly____ 21. How dissatisfied are you with the way your body is pcop.ortioned? Extremely dissatisfied— Very dissatisfied— Moderately dissatisfied Slightly dissatisfied— Not at all dissatisfied 22. How often do you think about your body shape? A1 ways— Of ten— Sometimes— Rarely— Never Haw do you feel about the di f ferent areas of your body Face: Strongly positive— Moderately pos i ti ve —“Neutral Maderately negative— Strongly negat ive Arms: Strongly positive— Moderately posi tive— Neutral Moderately negati ve— Strongly negat i ve Shouldersl Strongly positive— Moderately posi tive— Neutral Moderately negati ve— Strongly negati ve B r east: Strongly positive— Moderately posi tive— Neutral Moderately negative— Strongly negat i ve Stomach: Strongly pcsi ti ve— Moderately posi ti ve— Neutral Moderately negati ve— Strong1y negati ve Buttocks: Strongly positive--Moderately posi ti ve— Neutral Moderately negati ve— Strongly negative Thighs: Strongly positive— Moderately posi ti ve— Neutral Moderately negative— Strongly negati ve Haw often do you measure your body size? More than daily Daily__ More than weekly ____ Weekly Mo n t h l y Le; ;s than monthly ____ 11< Appendix C The Bulimia Test (BULIT) PLEASE NOTE: Copyrighted materials in this document have not been filmed at the request of the author. They are available for consultation, however, in the author's university library. These consist of pages: 115-121 123-130 132-133 135-136 138-141 143-150 152-153 122 Appendix D Schedule for Affective Disorders 131 Appendix E The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) 134 Appendix F Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale 137 Appendix G Dysfunctional Attitude Scale Appendix H Pleasant Events Schedule Appendix I Mauds ley Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory Appendix J State-Trait Anxietv Inventory SELF-EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE Developed by Charles D. Spiclbcrgcr «M COlUtKM«lioa *»Mh K. L. Gofsuch. K. Lushcnc. P. R. Vagg, and G. A. Jacobs S T A I Form V-l N am e - —______D ale______A g e ______Sex: M _____ F _____ DIRECTIONS: A number of statements which people have used to describe themselves are given below. Read each statement and then blacken in (he appropriate circle to the right of the statement to iudi- ^ ^ cate how you feelright now, that is,at (his moment. There are no right ^ or wrong answers. Do not spend too much time on any one statement but give the answer which seems to describe your present feelings best. '< 1. I feel calm ...... ,,t 2. I feel secure ...... {" S. I iiii; ten se ...... f') 4. ( feel strained ...... 5. I led a* ease ...... 0* (>. I feel upset ...... r,) 7. I am presently worrying over |x>ssihle misfortunes...... u> 8. I feel satisfied ...... :o *1. I feel frightened ...... <’* It). 1 feel comfortable ...... 11. 1 feel self-confident ...... fo 12. I feel nervous ...... l ‘J. I am jitte ry ...... 14. I feel indecisive ...... l*) lf>. I am relax ed ...... W 1(3. I feel content ...... (0 17. I am worried ...... ^ 18. I feel confused ...... ti) I‘J. I led Mcatly ...... 10 20. I l e d p le a s a n t ...... Consulting Psychologists Press 0 577 College Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94506 156 SELF-EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE STAI Form V-l Name Dale DIRECTIONS: A nuirtber of statements wtiich people Itave used (o describe (lictttsclves are given below. Read each statement and llien _ /. Mblacken a r k . . . in... ilie.1,, appropriate circle to .the1.. right_r of the statement to in- ^ V. >y dicate how yougenerally feel. There are no right or wrong answers. Do not spend too much time on any one statement but give the answer 7 % . * ''• which seems to describe how you generally feel. V 21. 1 feel pleasant ...... © CO tit © 22. I feel nervous and restless...... © (!> tit © 215. 1 feel satisfied with m yself...... © d) 0) © 21. 1 wish 1 could l>c as happy as others seem to l>e...... © d> "V © © (*» ti) © 2(». I fee! rested ...... © l i i 0 } © © t i ) ' © 28. 1 feel that diflicuhies are piling up so that 1 cannot overcome them © i if t i ) © 20. I worry mo imit h over something that really doesn't matter...... © ii; tit © 0) (i> (it © © q> tit © © ti* © © d» tit © !M. 1 make decisions easily...... © f it t i ) © © ( il t i* © i. 1 an* < n iitc « it...... © tit © *5 /. Some imim|Mirtau( thought runs through my miml and Ixithers me© <■* ti? © !5tt. 1 take disap]>ohtiiuciiismi keenly that 1 can't pul them out of my m in d ...... © lit tit © Ii*i. i am a steatiy ...... © w ti) © •10. 1 gel in a state ol tension or turmoil as 1 think over my recent concerns © ti* (y © Appendix K Informed Consent Form 158 Psychological Scn’iccs Center Department of Psychology L o u is i a n a St a t e U n iv e r s it y AM>AG«Ku.iuiiAi.AM>Mt<.iiANK.Ai.coutc( BATON ROUCE • LOUISIANA • 70801-5501 CONSENT FORM FOR BATING PISOROERS RESEARCH I > ______, voluntarily conAent to panticipatz in -the. Eating Oi&ondens ReAeanch pnognam din.zcX.exl by Donald A. Williamion, Ph.D.. Thi& nzAeanch involvzh both nanmaX and eaXJLnq diAondenzd individualA. Thenz(onz, pnoviAion o£ my content dozA not imply that I havz pnoblemA nelated to eating. By my Aignatunz, 1 agaze to p a n tic ip a tz in th e neAzanch axtXi.viti.zA indicated below and to allow data pznXaining to mz to bz nepontzd in Acholanly pabticationA, Acholanly meetinga , on in educational pnognami nelatzd to th e Eating PiAondzru Kz&zanck pnojzxtl. The a c liv itizA which I agnzz to panticipatz one thoAZ checked below: 1. C linical imXenviewA 2. Heighta n d WeightmzaAunement I. Pbychologicalt z A t i n q A ll o 6 my quzAtionA havz been anAwzned andI undzhAtand that I may withdnaw ^oa. the nzAzanch p-to/ecX without penalty. iUgnatunz Date Sngnatunzof, W itn z A A 159 Appendix L DSM-IIIR Diagnostic Checklists: Bulimia Nervosa Major Depression Dvsthvmia PLEASE NOTE: Copyrighted materials in this document have not been filmed at the request of the author. They are available for consultation, however, in the author's university library. These consist of pages: 160-162 UMI VITA Name: RITA C. PRATHER ACADEMIC HISTORY 1989 Ph.D. Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, Louisiana Major: Clinical Psychology Specialty Area: Behavioral Medicine Minor: Behavioral Neurology Dissertation title: The Affective Variant Hypothesis: How is Bulimia Nervosa Related to Depression? 1987-88 Internship: University of Mississippi Medical Center Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior Jackson, Mississippi 1985 M.A. Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, Louisiana Major: Clinical Psychology Thesis title: Differential Diagnosis of Eating Disorders: Purgers, Bingers, Obese, and Norma 1s . 1983 B.A. University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Major-. Psychology Honors: Summa Cum Laude HONORS 1986 Outstanding Young Women of America 1983 Summa Cum Laude, University of Central Florida 1983 Who's Who Among Students in American Universities 1982 PHI KAPPA PHI National Honor Society 1981 PSI CHI National Honor Society 1981 DELTA TAU KAPPA International Honor Society 1981 OMICRON DELTA KAPPA National Honor Society 163 164 TEACHING ACTIVITIES 1988-1989 Assistant Professor. Appointed to Graduate faculty September, 1988 Texas A & M University Department of Psychology 1987-1988 Teaching Instructor. University of Mississippi Medical Center Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior 1986-1987 Instructor. Appointed to faculty August, 1986 . Department of Psychology Louisiana State University 1983-1984 Teaching Assistant. Department of Psychology Louisiana State University RESEARCH ACTIVITIES 1987-1988 Research Associate Eating Disorders Unit University of Mississippi Medical Center Research Associate UMC Headache Clinic University of Mississippi Medical Center Research Associate Behavioral Cardiology Veterans Administration Medical Center Jackson, MS 1983-1987 Research Associate Eating Disorders Clinic Psychological Services Center Louisiana State University CLINICAL EXPERIENCE 1987-1988 Psychology Resident. University of Mississippi Medical Center Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior Jackson, MS 165 1983-1987 Clinical Psychology Trainee. Eating Disorders Clinic Psychological Services Center Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA Supervisor: D. A. Williamson, Ph.D. 1985-1986 Psychological Consultant. Center on Problem Eating Baton Rouge General Medical Center Baton Rouge, LA 1985-1987 Clinical Psychology Trainee. Neuropsychological Clinic Psychological Services Center Louisiana State Univesity Supervisor: Wm. D. Gouvier, Ph.D. 1985-1986 Clinical Psychology Trainee. Adult Services Clinic Psychological Services Center Louisiana State University Supervisor: Wm. D. Gouvier, Ph.D. 1984-1985 Clinical Psychology Trainee. Child Services Clinic Psychological Services Center Louisiana State University Supervisor: June Tuma, Ph.D. ADMINISTRATIVE/SERVICE ACTIVITIES 1988-1989 Texas A & M University Clinical Search Committee Library Committee TAMU MENTORS Program In Search of a Speaker Program 1984-1985 Graduate Assistant. Psychological Services Center Louisiana State University Supervisor: Donald A. Williamson, Ph.D. 1984-1985 Graduate Student Representative Clinical Training Committee Department of Psychology Louisiana State University 1981-1983 Peer Advisor Department of Psychology University of Central Florida Orlando, FL 166 1981-1982 Charter President PSI CHI National Honor Society University of Central Florida OTHER PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES 1988 Eating disorders and psychopathology. Presented at University of Mississippi Medical Center Psychiatry Grand Rounds February 19. 1988 Body Image: Impossible dreams and unrealistic means. Presented at the University of Mississippi Medical Center Community Education meeting March 17. 1988 Overview of Eating Disorders. Presented at the Mississippi State University annual Women's Week March 29. PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS 1981-Present American Psychological Association 1986-Present Division 12, American Psychological Assoc iation 1988-Present Division 38, American Psychological Association 1982-Present Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy 1984-Present Southeastern Psychological Association 1985-Present The Society of Behavioral Medicine GRANTS Coauthor with D. B. Penzien, Ph.D. Behavioral versus pharmacological treatment of recurrent migraine headache. Funded 1/88 by Clinical Research Center, University of Mississippi Medical Center. $2500.00 Coauthor with D. B. Penzien, Ph.D. Menstrual versus non-menstrual migraineurs: Fluctuations of reproductive hormones and physical symptoms across the menstrual cycle. Funded 1/88 by Clinical Research Center, University of Mississippi Medical Center. $3000.00 167 PUBLICATIONS Williamson, D. A., Prather, R. C., & Blouin, D. C. (in press). Differential diagnosis of bulimia nervosa, binge-eaters, obese, and normal subjects using behavioral assessment procedures. Behavioral Assessment. Williamson, D. A., Prather, R. C., Bennett, S. M . , Davis, C. J., Watkins, P. C., & Grenier,C. E. (1989). An uncontrolled evaluation of inpatient and outpatient cognitive-behavior therapy for bulimia nervosa. Behavior Modification. 13, 340-360. Williamson, D. A., Prather, R. C., Goreczny, A. J., Davis, C. J., & McKenzie, S. J. (1989). Psychopathology of bulimia. In W. G. Johnson (Ed.) Advances in Eating Disorders. (2nd. Ed.) Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press. Prather, R. C. (1988). Sexual dysfunction of diabetic females: A review. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 17(3), 277-284. Prather, R. C., &. Williamson, D. A. (1988). Psychopathology associated with bulimia, binge eating, and obesity. Internationa 1 Journal of Eating Disorders, 7, 177-184. Williamson, D. A., Davis, C. J., & Prather, R. C. (1988). Assessment of health related disorders. In M. Hersen & A. S. Bel lack (Eds.) Behavioral Assessment: A practical handbook (3rd. Ed.). New York: Pergamon Press. Williamson, D. A., Prather, R. C., Kelley, M. L., & Hefer, R. (1988). Eating Disorders. In J. L. Matson (Ed.) Treating Childhood and Adolescent Psychopathology. New York: Plenum. Williamson, D. A., Prather, R. C., Upton, L., Davis, C. J., Ruggiero, L., &. VanBuren, D. (1987). Severity of bulimia: Relationship with depression and other psychopathology. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 6. 39-47. Williamson, D. A., Kelley, M. L., Cavell, T. A., & Prather, R. C. (1987). Eating and eliminating disorders. In C. L. Frame &. J . L. Matson (Eds.) Handbook of Assessment in Child Psychopathology: Applied issues in differential diagnosis and treatment evaluation. New York: Plenum. 168 PRESENTATIONS AND SYMPOSIA Penzien, D. B., Johnson, C. A., Carpenter, D., Prather, R. C. et al (March, 1989). Home-based behavioral treatment vs. propranolol for recurrent migraine: Preliminary findings. Society of Behavioral Medicine, San Francisco. Krug, L. M . , Johnson, C. A., Penzien, D. B., Meeks, G. R., Prather, R. C. et al (March, 1989). Fluctuation of hormones and physical symptoms across menstrual cycles of miqraineurs. Society of Behavioral Medicine, San Francisco. Payne, T. J., Johnson, C. A., Penzien, D. B., Parisi, S., Beckham, J. C., Prather, R. C. et al (March, 1989). Cluster analysis of functional capacity, somatic, and psychological symptoms in cardiac outpatients. Society of Behavioral Medicine, San Francisco. Payne, T. J., Penzien, D. B., Porzelius, J., Eldridge, G., Parisi, S., Johnson, C. A., Beckham, J. C., Prather, R. C., &. Rodriguez, G. (March, 1989). The relationship between smoking and chest pain symptoms in an outpatient cardiac population. Society of Behavioral Medicine, San Francisco. Prather, R. C., & Williamson, D. A. (November, 1987). Do obese requesting weight loss treatment differ from obese not seeking treatment? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Boston. Williamson, D. A., Prather, R. C., McKenzie, S. J., &. Davis, C. J. (November, 1986). Inpatient versus outpatient treatment of bulimia. J. Scott Mizes (Chair), The cognitive behavioral treatment of bulimia: A comparison of different treatment approaches and prediction of treatment efficacy. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Chicago. Upton, L. R . , Williamson, D. A., Klug, F., Davis, C. J., & Prather, R. C. (November, 1986). Exercise habits in an eating disorder population. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Chicago. 169 Prather, R. C., Upton, L., Williamson, D. A., Davis, C. J., Ruggiero, L., & VanBuren, D. (November, 1985). Bulimia, depression, and general psycho 1 opatho 1 ocrv. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Houston. Prather, R. C., McKenzie, S., Upton, L., & Williamson, D. A. (November, 1985). A four-component behavioral treatment for bulimics who puree. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Houston. Prather, R. C., & Phillips, P. A. (April, 1983). Pretraininq and muscle relaxation while playing video games. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Florida Academy of Science, Melbourne, FL. Prather, R. C. (December, 1982). The importance of thorough assessment as demonstrated in the elimination of insomnia: A case study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Florida Association of Behavioral Analysis, Tampa, FL. Zegman, M . , Baker, B., & Prather, R. C. (November, 1982). Assessing adherence to program and nonprogram behaviors for weight reduction. Paper presesnted at the annual meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Los Angeles. DOCTORAL EXAMINATION AND DISSERTATION REPORT Candidate: Rita C. Prather Major Field: Psychology Title of Dissertation: The Affective Variant Hypothesis: How Is Bulimia Nervosa Related to Depression? Approved: Major Professor and Chairman Dean of the Graduate^ggftppT EXAMINING^XOMMITTEE: Date of Examination: Sept. 26, 1989-