Horseback Riding Country Stays
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2015 Klondoree Leaders Guide
Tahosa High Adventure Base Camp $12 / Camper Fri – Sat $18 / Camper Fri – Sun Questions? Contact Chairman Kyle Kirkpatrick 2015 [email protected] KLONDOREE acc LEADERS GUIDE Table of Contents Date/Time ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Location: Camp Tahosa ................................................................................................................................. 4 Map ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 Directions .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Online Registration ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Costs and Late Fees ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Arrival and Departure ................................................................................................................................... 5 Campsites .................................................................................................................................................. 5 On‐Site Check In ....................................................................................................................................... -
Draft Environmental Assessment for North Texas Optimization of Airspace and Procedures in the Metroplex
Draft Environmental Assessment for North Texas Optimization of Airspace and Procedures in the Metroplex Volume II - Appendices September 2013 Prepared by: United States Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Fort Worth, Texas Table of Contents APPENDIX A A.1 First Early Notification Announcement................................................................................ 1 A.1.1 Early Notification Letters ..................................................................................................... 1 A.1.2 Comments Received From the First Announcement........................................................23 A.1.3 Outreach Meetings............................................................................................................49 APPENDIX B B.1 List of Preparers.................................................................................................................. 1 B.1 Receiving Parties & Draft EA Notification of Availability..................................................... 3 APPENDIX C C.1 Contact Information............................................................................................................. 1 C.2 References.......................................................................................................................... 1 APPENDIX D D.1 List of Acronyms.................................................................................................................. 1 D.2 Glossary ............................................................................................................................. -
Spring/Summer 2015
INSIDE THIS ISSUE NONPROFIT BCHC Organization BACKCOUNTRY HORSEMEN OF President's Message Pg 3 U.S. Postage CALIFORNIA PAID BCHA PUBLIC LANDS RESOLUTION Pg 4 13061 Rosedale Hwy Manteca, CA BCHC EDUCATION FUND Pg 9 Suite G, Box 217 95336 RENDEZVOUS RECAP Pg 14-15 Bakersfield, CA 93314 No. 43 Membership Application Pg 17 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED Unit News Pg 18 For more BCHC information, see our website: bchcalifornia.org The Backcountry News Volume 26, Issue 2 The Official Publication of Backcountry Horsemen of California SPRING/SUMMER 2015 29th Annual RENDEZVOUS DATES BCHC’s 2015 Rendezvous was held at the Calaveras County Fairgrounds on March ANNOUNCED 13, 14 and 15, 2015. This year’s theme was “Packing Our Youth into the Future”, with lots of programs of kid’s activities. There were leather classes, packing classes, March 18, 19, 20, 2016 horse painting and coloring contest. Everything was geared toward educating and to be held again at the entertaining the younger folks. Calaveras County Fairground The older folks found a lot of traditional activities to be involved in; LNT Classes; a Trail Challenge; Wine, Beer and Cheese Tasting along with BLM Adoptions and "Working Together to Save Our Trails" Dutch Oven Cooking. Educational trainings and seminars covered such topics as equine health care, nutrition, safety, saddle fitting, and pack demonstrations. The Western Art show featured hand-made leather and silver pieces which included a gun belt and holster, a knife sheath, and spurs. The Trail Challenge was an obstacle course competition that tested the skills of both the horse and the rider. -
2021 Area Lodging Guide
VISITMCCURTAINCOUNTY.COM Hwy 259 Ti mb il erwolf Tra Golf Cours Lu e Road ci River Bend an Road C Sorrel edar Creek il Carson ra oad T Creek Area R a k at ee f r k Moun C u odge L Lakeview L Broken Bow r tai n L e Gap Road F ns ork o b e e Rive s v iv t e Dr Reservoir m ail Deer Creek Trail te Coyot r C i r S r T Stevens e T a e t k a Gap Area L u kf Hochatown H T Overlook R 259A ve O Ste ns Gap Creek Beaver Lodge Nature Trails N Radio Tower Beacon 259A River Bend Power Area House Big Oak Hwy Nature Trails 259 Mou H nta in T Fo rk R R iver Beavers Bend O Gr 259A N a State Park v Reregulation Dam el R 4.3 Miles oad Public Presbyterian Use Area Falls Hwy ile Hwy 1 M 7 Steel iles 70 3 Junction 259 5 M d a Oak Hill o R Broken g i Bow a r 70 BUS C N 70 . Craig Road NW Texas Ave. C e n t r H a l T A v R e BUS . O Hwy N Broken 70 259 t t MLK Dr. Bow d e SE Washington St. e 10th St. a e e o r C r t e t 9th St. R n S S t e e y y r 8th St. m a v v a a a i i l r r w 70 w A D 7th St. -
Property for Sale Broken Bow Oklahoma
Property For Sale Broken Bow Oklahoma Inertial and shrinelike Ragnar industrialised while stupefacient Sigmund overlards her populace uncommendably and embrangles weekdays. Warped and actionable Sergio caviling while battle-scarred Arvind epistolising her obligatoriness significatively and cinchonizes violently. Diego tunnel her pseudonyms unhappily, synecologic and conjugate. How the help you for oklahoma or as your vacation destination weekend with increasing as slings now Tate operates a standing cattle ranch in elaborate Bow OK with the help of you beloved helper Pepper a devoted blue heeler Ridgeview 41 Acres SOLD 75 Acre. Even more details and the eastern wild turkey constructs development. Broken Bow Waterfront Properties for Sale United Country. REAL ESTATE The median home farm in each Bow hook Real Estate 6300 Home appreciation the last 10 years has been 37. You for sale by owner financed properties is prime hunting land adjacent to check with all property listed as bow lake and hochatown, personal countryside escape. Tripadvisor finding the property for properties are standing in bow! Groups and property in oklahoma general area and sits on the lost creek area are you may discover an easy. Broken Bow OK real estate listings and homes for honest home. Travelocity has been easier to the family homes, llc is to the cabin building lots for lease situation is. Find property for oklahoma land. Just minutes from motivated sellers to hunt hogs, hiking trails southwest and appliances, texas real estate requirements in bow property for sale broken oklahoma? The broken bow cabins for properties for individuals with plenty of space for captcha below for dian jordan said, no rent out homes on front access. -
Western-Experience-Brochure2017
1 2 1. A to Z Guest Ranch 64599 Ashby Rd. Located approx. 1 mi. W. off Hwy. 259 between Big Cedar Smithville, OK 74957 THE SPUR OF & Octavia. Watch for signs. 580-244-3729 Creeks, lush pine forests & abundance of wildlife with more than 150 mi. of trails for hikers, ATVs & horseback riders. Rental horses avail., or bring your own. 27 RV sites with hookups, 2 dump stations. Chef-prepared meals avail. for THE MOMENT cabin/camping guests. Cabins avail. w/fireplace & satellite TV. www.atozguestranch.com With more than 80 attractions spread across the state, you have the freedom to act on your impulse to unplug and relax on any given weekend. 2. Arbuckle Trail Rides LLC Sulphur, OK 73086 Call for directions. Reservations required. 580-622-6326 Arbuckle Trail Rides offers guided trail rides year-round for 580-993-0097 riders age 6 and up. Ride 1-2 hours up to full-day excursions on well-trained horses with experienced guides. Riding FARM & RANCH ATTRACTIONS instruction is available, teaching safe, effective confidence- The rich stories, culture and history of Oklahoma’s agricultural roots building horsemanship skills. No riding experience FARM & RANCH are on display at our museums and ranches for adventurers of all ages. necessary! Call or email for reservations. ATTRACTIONS www.arbuckletrailrides.com GUEST RANCHES 3. Arrowhead Stables Canadian, OK 74425 Guest ranches are a Western experience getaway – stay all night, Stables located in Arrowhead State Park, 6 mi. S. of Eufaula at the 918-465-1500 Canadian exit off Hwy. 69. Follow signs to Arrowhead State Park, GUEST RANCHES hit a hiking trail at dawn and be fishing by noon. -
Final Impact Statement for the Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan for the Endangered American Burying Beetle
Final Environmental Impact Statement For the Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan for the Endangered American Burying Beetle for American Electric Power in Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Texas Volume II: Appendices September 2018 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southwest Region Albuquerque, NM Costs to Develop and Produce this EIS: Lead Agency $29,254 Applicant (Contractor) $341,531 Total Costs $370,785 Appendix A Acronyms and Glossary Appendix A Acronyms and Glossary ACRONYMS °F Fahrenheit ABB American burying beetle AEP American Electric Power Company AMM avoidance and minimization measures APE Area of Potential Effects APLIC Avian Power Line Interaction Committee APP Avian Protection Plan Applicant American Electric Power Company ATV all-terrain vehicles BGEPA Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act BMP best management practices CE Common Era CFR Code of Federal Regulations Corps Army Corps of Engineers CPA Conservation Priority Areas CWA Clean Water Act DNL day-night average sound level EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMF electric magnetic fields EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FR Federal Register GHG greenhouse gases HCP American Electric Power Habitat Conservation Plan for American Burying Beetle in Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Texas ITP Incidental Take Permit MDL multi-district litigation NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHD National Hydrography Dataset NOI Notice of Intent NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service NWI National Wetlands Inventory NWR National Wildlife Refuge OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration ROD Record of Decision ROW right-of-way American Electric Power Habitat Conservation Plan September 2018 A-1 Environmental Impact Statement U.S. -
Sapulpa 2030 Comprehensive Plan (2030 Plan)
CHAPTER II BASIS FOR CONNECTING TO THE FUTURE: SAPULPA 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (2030 PLAN) INTRODUCTION The basis for the 2030 Plan is formed by major forces which have shaped the development of the Planning Area in the past and which can be expected to be determinants of development during the Planning Period. The present development of the Planning Area has been referred to as the “physical facts” which must be considered in public policy decisions related land use planning. The future development of the Planning Area will be shaped by the public policies adopted as a result of the Planning Process which results in “Connecting to the Future: Sapulpa 2030 Comprehensive Plan” (2030 Plan). The location of the Planning Area and Corporate Limits Boundary are shown on the Location and Planning Area Map (Map 1). The Sapulpa Corporate Limits contains 24.6 square miles and the unincorporated area within the Annexation Fenceline including Creek and Tulsa County is 68.2 square miles. The total area included within the Planning Area is 92.8 square miles. The largest part of the Planning Area is in Creek County, encompassing 69.1 square miles and 22.57 square miles of incorporated area. Approximately 1.1 square mile is included in the northern part of the Planning Area and Tulsa County. Maps referred to in this section are included at the end of this Chapter except for Map 1 which is included at the end of Chapter I. This Chapter will present, discuss and analyze the following physical, social and economic determinants of development: Physical Features: Physical features and the natural environment Man-made physical features and the built environment Social Factors and Demographic Factors Economic Factors PHYSICAL FEATURES The physical features of the Planning Area are discussed below in terms of natural and man-made physical features and determine to a large extent the nature and type of II-1 Connecting to the Future: Sapulpa 2030 Comprehensive Plan development that will occur and the general direction and areas where future growth will take place. -
T"Eerankjin News Record
t"eErankJin news reCorD Vol,26, No.22 Twosections, 42 pages Phone:(20l) 725-3300 Thursday,’June I, 1978 Secondclass postage pald at Manville, N.J.08835 $4.50a year115 cents per copy Council strikes code from agenda "SPOntaneouscomment’ more than on mostissues bySteveGoodman itemfrom the agenda. The fifth ’yea’ despitethe vote to withdrawthe issue, ownerof theapartment complex has a MauaglngEdltor vote was from Joe Martins, who Housing and Urban Development arrived at the meetingafter the MR. METTLERreported the tHUD)mortgage. According to Mr. FranklinTownship Couni:il aborted tablingvote hadhecn taken. "spontaneouscomment" hc received Mettler, the federal governmentcan Its effort to introduceon Interior DeputyMayor Charles Duraod,a woamorsthanonmcateeunclllssuen.Overrule a townshipdecision on propertymaintenancecedeportalnlng" staunch opponent to the ordinance, Althoughhe votedto introducethe Edgemereto "safeguardtheir mor- to single family homesas well as molionedthe ordinancebe withdrawn measureIn Tuesday’sstraw poll, he tgagewith Mr.Weincr." apartments and other multiple- and Mr. Benchemseconded the indicatedas tlmepnssed, "the more l Acknowledgingthc need for some dwellingunits by voting 8-0 to strikeit motion, thoughtabout" it the moreI felt I formof cede,Mr. Mettlet said Council fromthe agendaat last Thursday’s couldn’t’supportit in the end." shouldnot forgetabout It entirely. publicmeeting. TIlE AFTERMATllof the Council Healso questionedwhether the code "Atleast the actionwe have taken, Thetabled ordinance would have sct actionelicited a claimof politicsfrom wouldhe effective whereit was in rejectingit for singlefamily homes, up regulationsrequiring homeowners MayorCullen and .diverse ex- needed "the most, which is helpsusalittlcbitindefiningwhatthe to opentheir front doorsto township planatiens fromthe three Council Edgemere,",because Tex Weiner, eventualcede might be like," hesaid. codeenforcement inspectors checking memberswho shifted their position. -
Geographic Names
GEOGRAPHIC NAMES CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES ? REVISED TO JANUARY, 1911 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 PREPARED FOR USE IN THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOGRAPHIC BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C, JANUARY, 1911 ) CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. The following list of geographic names includes all decisions on spelling rendered by the United States Geographic Board to and including December 7, 1910. Adopted forms are shown by bold-face type, rejected forms by italic, and revisions of previous decisions by an asterisk (*). Aalplaus ; see Alplaus. Acoma; township, McLeod County, Minn. Abagadasset; point, Kennebec River, Saga- (Not Aconia.) dahoc County, Me. (Not Abagadusset. AQores ; see Azores. Abatan; river, southwest part of Bohol, Acquasco; see Aquaseo. discharging into Maribojoc Bay. (Not Acquia; see Aquia. Abalan nor Abalon.) Acworth; railroad station and town, Cobb Aberjona; river, IVIiddlesex County, Mass. County, Ga. (Not Ackworth.) (Not Abbajona.) Adam; island, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester Abino; point, in Canada, near east end of County, Md. (Not Adam's nor Adams.) Lake Erie. (Not Abineau nor Albino.) Adams; creek, Chatham County, Ga. (Not Aboite; railroad station, Allen County, Adams's.) Ind. (Not Aboit.) Adams; township. Warren County, Ind. AJjoo-shehr ; see Bushire. (Not J. Q. Adams.) Abookeer; AhouJcir; see Abukir. Adam's Creek; see Cunningham. Ahou Hamad; see Abu Hamed. Adams Fall; ledge in New Haven Harbor, Fall.) Abram ; creek in Grant and Mineral Coun- Conn. (Not Adam's ties, W. Va. (Not Abraham.) Adel; see Somali. Abram; see Shimmo. Adelina; town, Calvert County, Md. (Not Abruad ; see Riad. Adalina.) Absaroka; range of mountains in and near Aderhold; ferry over Chattahoochee River, Yellowstone National Park. -
Keystone Ancient Forest Preserve Resource Management Plan 2011
Keystone Ancient Forest Preserve Resource Management Plan 2011 Osage County & Tulsa County, Oklahoma Lowell Caneday, Ph.D. With Kaowen (Grace) Chang, Ph.D., Debra Jordan, Re.D., Michael J. Bradley, and Diane S. Hassell This page intentionally left blank. 2 Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the assistance of numerous individuals in the preparation of this Resource Management Plan. On behalf of the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department’s Division of State Parks, staff members were extremely helpful in providing access to information and in sharing of their time. In particular, this assistance was provided by Deby Snodgrass, Kris Marek, and Doug Hawthorne – all from the Oklahoma City office of the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department. However, it was particularly the assistance provided by Grant Gerondale, Director of Parks and Recreation for the City of Sand Springs, Oklahoma, that initiated the work associated with this RMP. Grant provided a number of documents, hosted an on-site tour of the Ancient Forest, and shared his passion for this property. It is the purpose of the Resource Management Plan to be a living document to assist with decisions related to the resources within the park and the management of those resources. The authors’ desire is to assist decision-makers in providing high quality outdoor recreation experiences and resources for current visitors, while protecting the experiences and the resources for future generations. Lowell Caneday, Ph.D., Professor Leisure Studies Oklahoma State University Stillwater, -
Fluvial Geomorphology Analysis of the Kiamichi River, Oklahoma
W 2800.7 F293 no. T-l9-P-l 6/04-6/06 c.l FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY ANALYSIS OF THE KIAMICIll RIVER, OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION' JUNE 1,2004 through JUNE 30, 2006 A comprehensive geomorphic analysis of the Kiamichi River, Oklahoma was conducted to characterize the current landscape, fluvial geomorphic condition, flow and sediment regimes, and to identify potential impacts from the impoundment of the Jackfork Creek tributary to the morphological form and function of the river. The Kiamichi River channel has changed little over the last 25 years. It was classified as a Rosgen F type stream and had a basin relief ratio of 0.00345. The Kiamichi River Basin is classified as a Rosgen X type valley. Meander wavelength increased significantly in the downstream direction; the average reach meander wavelength ranged from 11 to 60 mean reach bankfull widths. Bankfull width, bankfull area, width:depth ratio, and channel stability increased in the downstream direction. Although there was no significant change in substrate size longitudinally, the percentage of gravel and cobble substrate increased and the percentage of bedrock decreased in the downstream direction. Bankfull discharge increased in the downstream direction, as expected. The majority of sites sampled were classified as Rosgen F4 stream types. The effective discharge (Qe) at the Big Cedar gaging station was estimated to be 4500 cubic feet per second (cfs) with a threshold discharge (Qt) of 0.1 cfs. The Antlers gaging station Qe was estimated to be 25,000 cfs with a Qt of 3.5 cfs. Deposition bar area below the Jackfork Creek tributary has increased over time.