The Estonian Competition Board Employs 42 Civil Servants, Including 13 Lawyers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Estonian Competition Board Employs 42 Civil Servants, Including 13 Lawyers C 28 E/112 Official Journal of the European Union EN 6.2.2003 The Estonian Competition Board employs 42 civil servants, including 13 lawyers. A comparison with Member States is not relevant in view of the present legal framework: Under the rules for the implementation of Article 63(1)(i), (1)(ii) and (2) of the Europe Agreement establishing an association between the Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Estonia, of the other part, it is explicitly stated that cases falling under Article 63(1) and (2) of the Europe Agreement are dealt with by the Commission on the Community side and the Competition Board on the Estonian side. Inside the Community, on the other hand, Member States do not at present have a legal obligation to have national competition authorities (although most of them have found it useful to establish such an authority). (1) COM(2001) 700 final. (2003/C 28 E/126) WRITTEN QUESTION E-1493/02 by Stavros Xarchakos (PPE-DE) to the Commission (29 May 2002) Subject: Biological sewage treatment plants in Greece The Commission recently took the decision to bring proceedings against Greece in the Court of Justice for its failure to observe the final deadline for setting up a third-generation sewage treatment plant in the region of Elefsina. The final deadline expired in 1998(!). The proceedings could also involve a further 11 areas in the vicinity of sensitive ecosystems which have not observed Community directives or binding dates. More precisely, according to reports in the Greek press, since 1998 tertiary treatment plants should have been completed in 16 Greek towns with populations of over 10 000 in sensitive areas. However, the number of towns which complied with the directive was only four (!), while the Greek authorities justify themselves by saying that the degree of compliance in 1998 was equally low in other Member States … At the present time, four years later, 12 tertiary biological treatment plants have been completed in Greece in areas in the close vicinity of sensitive outfall points (such as the Gulf of Arta, the Lefkada straits, etc.), while the other four plants, at Thriasio, Grevena, Kilkis and Thiva, remain unfinished. In fact, the construction of the plant at Thriasio is still at the drawing-board stage! There are, however, also problems associated with the monitoring of the operation of the plants by the central administration or the local authorities which, according to a study carried out by Athens University, has left 30 % of the plants facing serious operational problems (e.g. inadequate maintenance, shortages of consumables, unrepresentative sampling etc.). According to the same study, in many instances, the sewage treatment plants were never operational, an example being Serifos where the plant was completed in 1994 with Community and national funding, but is not in operation because of mistakes in the planning of the project. Is the Commission familiar with this matter and what are its views thereon? Which of the above projects received funding and what were the exact amounts? Is it possible that further action will be taken against Greece in the Court of Justice for the other delays in building biological sewage treatment plants which should have been completed since 1998, as referred to above? If so, which projects by name? Does the Commission intend to intercede with the Greek authorities and in what manner to persuade them to put an end to these enormous delays in building biological sewage treatment plants and the failure of the local authorities to monitor and check on their operation? Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission (22 July 2002) The Commission is following the implementation process of Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment (1) in all the Member States, including Greece. In this context, the Commission has already initiated three individual infringement procedures against Greece for failure to comply with this Directive. These infringements concern the municipalities of Athens, Elefsina and Thessaloniki. Further investigations, with the view to assessing that the provisions and the deadlines are implemented, are underway. The Commission will not hesitate to take all the necessary measures, including action under Article 226 of the EC Treaty, in order to ensure that Community legislation is correctly applied. 6.2.2003 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 28 E/113 As far as Structural and Cohesion Funds are concerned, the Commission has requested the Greek authorities to provide the information about the individual projects that have been funded and the exact amounts involved. This will be forwarded to the Honourable Member upon receipt. Furthermore, the Commission has conducted review meetings in recent months to assess in partnership with the Greek authorities the scale of the task remaining to be done, in an effort to ensure that the most urgent investment requirements are undertaken as soon as possible in order to improve compliance with the relevant Community legislation. As is foreseen in the Community support framework for the current programming period 2000-2006, the Greek authorities are establishing a technical support entity to give guidance where necessary to municipal authorities in particular, for the proper design of sewage treatment plants, and support for their maintenance and operation after completion. This should help to avoid the problems in the maintenance and operation of previously completed sewage treatment plants of the kind referred to by the Honourable Member. The decision of the Greek government to establish bodies (DEYAs) with the appropriate competence and financial capacity is also a positive step which should improve efficiency in the building and operation of sewage treatment plants. (1) OJ L 135, 30.5.1991. (2003/C 28 E/127) WRITTEN QUESTION E-1506/02 by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission (29 May 2002) Subject: Production of vinegar from dried grapes From ancient times vinegar has been made in Greece from sun-dried grapes (mainly the Corinthian variety); in the Greek Food Code it is described as ‘genuine vinegar’ and is exported very successfully throughout the world. In the regulation on wine, (EC) No 1493/1999 (1), in spite of the fact that there is a reference to wine vinegar, there is no clear stipulation that vinegar made from dried grapes is wine vinegar, although the regulation states that dried grape alcohol is equivalent to vinous alcohol. Since the production of vinegar from dried grapes is an activity which supports producers, particularly those from an especially backward and poor region such as the Peloponnese, can the Commission say whether it will make the requisite amendments to Regulation No 1493/99, in order to clearly stipulate that vinegar from sun-dried grapes is wine vinegar, as is in fact the case, and to bring it into line with dried grape alcohol? (1) OJ L 179, 14.7.1999, p. 1. Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission (4 July 2002) Dried grape alcohol is not defined in Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on common organisation of the market in wine but is treated as a like product to wine alcohol when used in production of liqueur wine as defined in the Annex to that Regulation. But Council Regulation (EEC) No 1576/89 of 29 May 1989 laying down general rules on the definition, description and presentation of spirit drinks (1) defines wine spirit and raisin spirit quite differently (Article 1(4)(d) and (h)). A distinction must also be drawn in the case of vinegar. Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/ 1999 defines wine vinegar as vinegar … obtained exclusively by acetous fermentation of wine..
Recommended publications
  • The Statistical Battle for the Population of Greek Macedonia
    XII. The Statistical Battle for the Population of Greek Macedonia by Iakovos D. Michailidis Most of the reports on Greece published by international organisations in the early 1990s spoke of the existence of 200,000 “Macedonians” in the northern part of the country. This “reasonable number”, in the words of the Greek section of the Minority Rights Group, heightened the confusion regarding the Macedonian Question and fuelled insecurity in Greece’s northern provinces.1 This in itself would be of minor importance if the authors of these reports had not insisted on citing statistics from the turn of the century to prove their points: mustering historical ethnological arguments inevitably strengthened the force of their own case and excited the interest of the historians. Tak- ing these reports as its starting-point, this present study will attempt an historical retrospective of the historiography of the early years of the century and a scientific tour d’horizon of the statistics – Greek, Slav and Western European – of that period, and thus endeavour to assess the accuracy of the arguments drawn from them. For Greece, the first three decades of the 20th century were a long period of tur- moil and change. Greek Macedonia at the end of the 1920s presented a totally different picture to that of the immediate post-Liberation period, just after the Balkan Wars. This was due on the one hand to the profound economic and social changes that followed its incorporation into Greece and on the other to the continual and extensive population shifts that marked that period. As has been noted, no fewer than 17 major population movements took place in Macedonia between 1913 and 1925.2 Of these, the most sig- nificant were the Greek-Bulgarian and the Greek-Turkish exchanges of population under the terms, respectively, of the 1919 Treaty of Neuilly and the 1923 Lausanne Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • ANASTASIOS GEORGOTAS “Archaeological Tourism in Greece
    UNIVERSITY OF THE PELOPONNESE ANASTASIOS GEORGOTAS (R.N. 1012201502004) DIPLOMA THESIS: “Archaeological tourism in Greece: an analysis of quantitative data, determining factors and prospects” SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: - Assoc. Prof. Nikos Zacharias - Dr. Aphrodite Kamara EXAMINATION COMMITTEE: - Assoc. Prof. Nikolaos Zacharias - Dr. Aphrodite Kamara - Dr. Nikolaos Platis ΚΑΛΑΜΑΤΑ, MARCH 2017 Abstract . For many decades now, Greece has invested a lot in tourism which can undoubtedly be considered the country’s most valuable asset and “heavy industry”. The country is gifted with a rich and diverse history, represented by a variety of cultural heritage sites which create an ideal setting for this particular type of tourism. Moreover, the variations in Greece’s landscape, cultural tradition and agricultural activity favor the development and promotion of most types of alternative types of tourism, such as agro-tourism, religious, sports and medicinal tourism. However, according to quantitative data from the Hellenic Statistical Authority, despite the large number of visitors recorded in state-run cultural heritage sites every year, the distribution pattern of visitors presents large variations per prefecture. A careful examination of this data shows that tourist flows tend to concentrate in certain prefectures, while others enjoy little to no visitor preference. The main factors behind this phenomenon include the number and importance of cultural heritage sites and the state of local and national infrastructure, which determines the accessibility of sites. An effective analysis of these deficiencies is vital in order to determine solutions in order to encourage the flow of visitors to the more “neglected” areas. The present thesis attempts an in-depth analysis of cultural tourism in Greece and the factors affecting it.
    [Show full text]
  • FREQUENTLY ASKED Questionsi
    FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONSi Where is the prefecture of Grevena geographically? ......................................................................................... 2 How can I get to Grevena? .................................................................................................................................. 2 What reasons make Grevena one of the most popular tourist destinations in Greece? ................................... 3 Why is Grevena called "The land of the mushrooms"? ....................................................................................... 3 Which routes can I do in Grevena? ..................................................................................................................... 4 What museums are there? .................................................................................................................................. 6 How many stone bridges exist in the region? ..................................................................................................... 7 Where is the Vasilitsa Ski Center and what does it offer? .................................................................................. 8 What can lovers of religious tourism see in the area? ........................................................................................ 8 How can I go, what can I see in Valia Calda Nature Reserve and National Park of Northern Pindos? ............... 9 Alternative Activities – What sports can I do? .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Egnatia Motorway: Analysing the Impacts on the Economic and Social Sustainability of Urban Areas in Greece
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Nikolakopoulou, Christina; Karampekou, Lamprini Conference Paper Egnatia Motorway: Analysing the impacts on the economic and social sustainability of urban areas in Greece 53rd Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Regional Integration: Europe, the Mediterranean and the World Economy", 27-31 August 2013, Palermo, Italy Provided in Cooperation with: European Regional Science Association (ERSA) Suggested Citation: Nikolakopoulou, Christina; Karampekou, Lamprini (2013) : Egnatia Motorway: Analysing the impacts on the economic and social sustainability of urban areas in Greece, 53rd Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Regional Integration: Europe, the Mediterranean and the World Economy", 27-31 August 2013, Palermo, Italy, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/124071 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]
  • Aiani—Historical and Geographical Context
    CHAPTER 5 AIANI—HISTORICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL CONTEXT G. Karamitrou-Mentessidi Aiani—Elimiotis—Upper Macedonia According to the foundation myth preserved by Stephanos of Byzantium, “Aiani, a Macedonian city, was built by Aianos, a son of Elymos the Tyr- rhenian king, who migrated to Macedonia, ‘Aianaios’ was the ethnikon.” A reference to the city of Aiani was found by the French academic L. Heuzey in 1861 in two inscriptions in churches in the village of Kalliani (whose name may derive from “kali Aiani,” meaning “fair Aiani,”: in 1926 it was renamed Aiani). They led to various theories about the site of the settle- ment and its urban organization. The problem was not solved until offfijicial excavations began. Even if an urban settlement by the name of Elimeia did also exist, Aiani became the capital of Elimiotis at a very early date. The district of Elimeia or Elimiotis, bordering Orestis and Eordaea to the north, occupied the southern part of Upper Macedonia on both sides of the middle reach of the River Haliacmon, although its exact territorial extent is difffijicult to determine. During the Hellenistic era it appears to have included the region of Tymphaea to the west and, perhaps at an earlier date, the northern part of the Perrhaebian Tripolitis (Pythium, Azorus, and Doliche). Territorial disputes between Elimeia and its neigh- bours occurred, as can be seen in a Latin inscription found at Doliche, in which the emperor Trajan (101 ad) defijined the boundary between the Elimiotae and the inhabitants of Doliche by reviving an earlier ruling by King Amyntas III (393–369 bc) on the same issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Neotectonic Implications of the Grevena -Kozani Earthquake
    International Meeting on Results of the May 13, 1995 earthquake of West Macedonia: One Year After, Extended abstracts, p.76-80 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neotectonic Implications of Grevena - Kozani Earthquake (May 13, 1995, W. Macedonia, Greece) E. L. Lekkas, I. G. Fountoulis, S. G. Lozios, Ch. D. Kranis MsC, & E. I. Adamopoulou (University of Athens, Department of Geology, Panepisimioupoli Zografou, 157 84, Athens, Greece) Introduction The Grevena - Kozani area was considered up to now as one of the most seismically inactive ar- eas in Greece (Papazachos 1990, Papazachos et al 1995). On May 13, 1995, an earthquake of Ms=6.6 occurred, which caused many damages in a part of Kozani city and in some villages lo- cated between the cities of Grevena and Kozani (Carydis et al 1995, Lekkas et al 1995). The damage has been limited to relatively small area in the form of a triangle extending between the Serbia fault zone to the south, and the Chromion - Varis fault zone to the north (Fig. 1). The western limit was the Aliakmon river. The severe damage is mainly located at the villages lying at the foot of Mt. Vourinos, and some others, as Rymnio and Chromio. However, there still is an “eclectic” distribution, with two groups of highly damaged villages, one at the north (Knidi, Varis, Chromio) and the other at the south (Paleohori, Sarakina, Kentro, Messolakos, Kalamitsi and Ka- lohi). The recent earthquake have also caused a series of concominant geodynamic phenomena, the most frequent of which was the occurrence of numerous, but subsidiary, ground fissures at the vil- lages of Knidi, Sarakina, Paleohori, Chromio, Agapi and elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Response of the Government of Greece to the Report of The
    CPT/Inf (2002) 32 Response of the Government of Greece to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Greece from 23 September to 5 October 2001 The Government of Greece has requested the publication of the CPT's report on the Committee's visit to Greece in September/October 2001 (see CPT/Inf (2002) 31) and of its response. The response of the Government of Greece is set out in this document. Strasbourg, 20 November 2002 Response of the Government of Greece to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Greece from 23 September to 5 October 2001 - 3 - CONTENTS MINISTRY OF PUBLIC ORDER ……………………………………….. 5 MINISTRY OF JUSTICE ………………………………………………… 39 MINISTRY OF NATIONAL DEFENCE ………………………………… 51 MINISTRY OF MERCHANT MARINE ………………………………… 53 MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND WELFARE ……………………………. 55 - 5 - MINISTRY OF PUBLIC ORDER GREEK POLICE HEADQUARTERS SECURITY AND ORDER BRANCH DIRECTORATE OF ALIENS R E P O R T On the observations drawn up by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment ATHENS SEPTEMBER 2002 - 7 - CONTENTS PAGE A. INTRODUCTION 9 B. RESPONSES ON THE OBSERVATIONS DRAWN UP BY THE COMMITTEE, AS THE SAME ARE INCLUDED IN APPENDIX I TO ITS REPORT 10 1. PHYSICAL ILL-TREATMENT OF DETAINEES 10 i. Legal texts prescribing sanctions to be imposed on law enforcement officers in case of physical abuse of detainees 10 ii. Measures for the elimination of the phenomenon of violence exercised by police officers against citizens 12 iii.Training of Police Officers in relation to human rights 13 Innovations introduced in Police Officers' School 13 Innovations introduced in Police Constables' School 14 Innovations introduced in the school of retraining and refresher training 15 Innovations introduced in the School of National Security 16 iv.
    [Show full text]
  • THE “MACEDONIAN” SAGA What Does the Future Hold for the “Macedonian” Products of Greece and North Macedonia After the Prespa Agreement?
    ISSN 2003-2382 THE “MACEDONIAN” SAGA What does the future hold for the “Macedonian” products of Greece and North Macedonia after the Prespa Agreement? By Anna Sfetsiou ABSTRACT During the 28 years of this ongoing dispute, various issues Rights about the commercial use of the name have arisen concerning the use of the name “Macedonia”. “Macedonia” have been the object of an ongoing The ratification of the Agreement as well as the upcoming entry of The Republic of North Macedonia into the European dispute between Greece and North Macedonia for Union (EU) brought forward serious concerns regarding almost three decades. The issue was partially sett- the use and the registration of the name “Macedonia” as a led on 12 June 2018, when both countries agreed geographical indication (GI) and as a trade mark (TM) for upon the terms of the Prespa Agreement. However, several products and companies from both countries. The despite representing a long-awaited improvement, greatest concern for the entrepreneurs and producers of core aspects of the commercial use of the name the two countries has been the confusion caused by the “Macedonia” as trade mark and geographical use of the same name “Macedonia” as an indication of indication are yet to be discussed. Even though the their goods and services.3 Article 1(3) of the Prespa Agre- Agreement states that North Macedonia is required ement states that as far as TMs and brand names are con- to change the name of all the official government cerned, the two sides agree to support and encourage and government related institutions, there is still their business communities in institutionalizing a struc- uncertainty about how private companies may explore tured and in good faith dialogue, in the context of which [they] will seek to reach mutually acceptable solutions on the name and its association with their products.
    [Show full text]
  • Sofia University Seg Student Chapter Field Trip – 2019
    Sofia University “St. Kl. Ohridski”, Faculty of Geology and Geography, Department of Mineralogy, Petrology and Economic Geology, 15 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd., 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria; E- mails: [email protected] ORE DEPOSITS OF NORTH-EASTERN GREECE AND SOUTH-EASTERN BULGARIA - SOFIA UNIVERSITY SEG STUDENT CHAPTER FIELD TRIP – 2019 1 CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................... 2 “Khan Krum” (Ada Tepe) Deposit .............................................................. 3 Perama Hill Deposit ....................................................................................... 4 Xylagani VMS Deposit ................................................................................. 5 Maronia Deposit ............................................................................................. 6 Intrusion-related mineralization in Palea Kavala area ............................ 7 Stratoni, Skouries and Olimpias deposit (Kassandra mines) ................... 8 Vourinos Ophiolite Complex (Grevena Geopark) ..................................... 9 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................ 10 2 Introduction This year during 23-29th of May, 2019 Sofia University SEG Student Chapter organized six day field trip in North-Eastern Greece and South-Eastern Bulgaria. The aim of the trip was to visit and examine the regional geology and metallogeny of the area. In the trip twenty students (Fig.1.) with different degrees
    [Show full text]
  • Dytiki Makedonia
    Dytiki Makedonia PROJECT TOTAL ERDF ERDF URL - WEB ADRESS POPULATION DYTIKIACRONYM BUDGET CONTRIBUTION OBJECTIVE M WMSPIT ECU 400,100 50% 1 270,000 CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES STEERING COMMITTEE Western Macedonia is located in the north-west of Chairperson: General Secretary, Region of West Greece and borders Albania and the former Macedonia. Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. It is a mountain- Members representing: Region of West Macedo- ous region with low population density and until nia; Regional Development Agency (ANKO S.A.); recent years inadequate transportation links. The Ministry of Macedonia and Thrace; General Secre- primary sector (including mining and energy pro- tariat for Research and Technology; Prefectures of duction) accounts for around 35% of the workforce. Kozani, Florina, Kastoria and Grevena; Public Power Agriculture faces a series of problems including the Corporation; Business representative from each of small size of the average farm, low utilisation of new the four prefectures; Technological Educational technologies, lack of a regional quality product Institute of Kozani; Technical Chamber of Greece; label, environmental damage and limited develop- Geotechnical Chamber; Economic Chamber of ment of processing. Greece; Thessaloniki Technology Park; Centre of Manufacturing while growing in importance is con- Solid Fuel Technology; Municipal Tourism Enterprise centrated in sectors facing strong international com- of Kastoria. petition notably: wood (700 small enterprises engaged in wood-working and furniture production) DEVELOPING A REGIONAL and fur trading (clustered in the towns of Kastoria and INNOVATION PARTNERSHIP Siatista). The unique and unspoilt natural heritage are A strong point throughout the implementation has increasingly viewed as offering scope for expansion been the strengthening of relations between the key of sustainable tourism activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequency of Resistance to Benzimidazoles of Haemonchus Contortus Helminths from Dairy Sheep, Goats, Cattle and Buffaloes in Greece
    Supplementary material Article Frequency of Resistance to Benzimidazoles of Haemonchus contortus Helminths from Dairy Sheep, Goats, Cattle and Buffaloes in Greece Konstantinos Arsenopoulos, Styliani Minoudi, Isaia Symeonidou, Alexandros Triantafyllidis, Angeliki I. Katsafadou, Daphne T. Lianou, George C. Fthenakis and Elias Papadopoulos Table S1. Details of geographical origin of Haemonchus contortus helminths from sheep in Greece and results of their susceptibility / resistance to benzimidazoles. H. contortus Susceptibility / Resistance status of helminths (n) Region of the country Local authority Flocks (n) Abomasa (n) helminths (n) S / S R / S R / R Kavala 2 2 4 0 0 4 East Macedonia and Rodopi 1 1 2 0 0 2 Thrace Xanthi 1 1 2 0 0 2 Kilkis 1 1 1 0 0 1 Pieria 2 2 4 0 0 4 Central Macedonia Serres 2 2 4 0 0 4 Thessaloniki 7 7 12 0 0 12 Grevena 2 2 4 0 1 3 West Macedonia Kastoria 1 1 2 0 0 2 Epirus Ioannina 1 1 2 0 0 2 Karditsa 3 3 6 0 0 6 Larissa 6 6 12 0 0 12 Thessaly Magnisia 1 1 2 0 0 2 Sporades 2 2 3 0 1 2 Trikala 1 1 2 0 0 2 Corfu 1 1 1 0 0 1 Ionian islands Kefallonia 1 1 1 0 0 1 Zakynthos 1 1 1 0 0 1 West Greece Achaia 1 1 1 0 0 1 Evritania 1 1 1 0 0 1 Continental Greece Fthiotida 1 1 2 0 0 2 Pathogens 2020 www.mdpi.com/journal/pathogens Pathogens 2020 2 of 6 Viotia 1 1 2 0 0 2 Attica Attica islands 3 3 3 0 0 3 Arkadia 1 1 2 0 0 2 Peloponnese Μessinia 1 1 2 0 0 2 Lesvos 1 1 2 0 0 2 North Aegean Samos 1 1 2 0 0 2 Kalymnos 2 3 5 0 1 4 South Aegean Paros 1 1 2 0 0 2 Rhodes 1 2 4 0 0 4 Iraklion 1 1 1 0 0 1 Crete Rethymnon 1 1 2 0 0 2 TOTAL 53 55 96 0 3 93 Pathogens 2020 3 of 6 Table S2.
    [Show full text]
  • Contestations Over Macedonian Identity, 1870–1912
    VICTORIA UNIVERSITY CONTESTATIONS OVER MACEDONIAN IDENTITY, 1870–1912 by NICK ANASTASOVSKI A THESIS SUBMITTED TO VICTORIA UNIVERSITY IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES MELBOURNE, VICTORIA MAY, 2005 2 STUDENT DECLARATION I, Nick Anastasovski, declare that the thesis entitled Contestations over Macedonian Identity 1870–1912 is no more than 100,000 words in length, exclusive of tables, figures, appendices and references. This thesis contains no material that has been submitted previously, in whole or in part, for the award of any other academic degree or diploma. Except where otherwise indicated, this thesis is my own work. Nick Anastasovski May 2005 3 DEDICATION To my wife Sophie whose support and encouragement made the study possible 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract 9 Acknowledgments 11 Glossary of terms 13 List of maps 28 List of tables 32 List of illustrations 39 List of photographs 40 Introduction 42 Context 42 Summary 48 Chapter One: Colonisation and Islamicisation 55 1.1 Colonisation and Islamicisation 55 1.2 Religion and nationality 92 Chapter Two: Peoples and Populations 99 2.1 Peoples of Macedonia 99 Macedonians: The contested majority 99 Vlahs: Romanian or Greek, a contested minority 107 5 Greeks: Fishermen, farmers or townsfolk? 112 Turks and Albanians: The colonists 114 Gypsies and Jews: The uncontested 120 2.2 Conflicts around population data 124 Territorial boundaries 124 2.3 Population statistics 128 Ottoman Turkish population data 128 Population statistics advocated
    [Show full text]