Tiller Trial Seen As Day of Reckoning

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tiller Trial Seen As Day of Reckoning WWW.THELEAVEN.COM | NEWSPAPER OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF KANSAS CITY IN KANSAS | VOL. 30, NO. 31 MARCH 27, 2009 ABORTIONIST ON TRIAL Notorious late-term abortionist George Tiller faces criminal charges Mike Hutmacher/Wichita Eagle/MCT Dr. George Tiller enters the courtroom March 23 on the first day of his jury trial in Wichita. Tiller faces 19 misdemeanor counts charging he had an improper financial relationship with a Lawrence doc - tor providing second opinions on late-term abortions. Tiller trial seen as Archbishop, pro-lifers day of reckoning contest governor’s claim By JOE BOLLIG to pro-life credentials Leaven staff By JOE BOLLIG KANSAS CITY, Kan. — The day that many pro- Leaven staff life veterans hoped for, but thought they might never see, has finally come. KANSAS CITY, Kan. — Call it a tale of two Web Doctor George Tiller, one of only two late-term sites. abortion providers in the nation, is on trial for vio - They have the same subject, but are diametrical - lating Kansas’ late-term abortion laws. ly opposed in their view of a certain politician: Pro-life advocates have asserted for several Governor Kathleen Sebelius. years that Tiller, working from his Women’s The first, a project of Catholics United, is Health Care Services clinic in Wichita, was violat - Catholics for Kathleen Sebelius, at: www.catholics ing Kansas’ relatively strict late-term abortion forsebelius.org. laws. The second, sponsored by Catholic Advocate, is They could not, however, get the judicial ma - Catholics against Kathleen Sebelius, at: www. chinery moving until former Kansas attorney gen - catholicsagainstsebelius.org. eral Phill Kline began an investigation in 2003. Six Both sites argue over the governor’s stands on years of investigation, legal maneuvering and de - life issues. The first claims Gov. Sebelius is pro-life, lay followed, culminating in this trial. Photo courtesy of Operation Rescue while the second claims she is anything but. The trial is taking place in Sedgwick County Governor Kathleen Sebelius hosted a dinner at Cedar Crest for Mary Kay Culp, executive director of Kansans for District Court, Wichita, Judge Clark V. Owens pre - George Tiller (left), fellow abortionists LeRoy Carhart, Shelly Sella Life, says it’s not even close. In her judgment, the siding. and Susan Robinson, and 20 Tiller clinic staffers. The shirt held by governor is firmly pro-choice. Culp and other the governor refers to election victories of candidates supported Turn to TILLER on page 4 by Tiller and his political action committee. Turn to RECORD on page 5 2 ARCHBISHOP THE LEAVEN • MARCH 27, 2009 THE LEAVEN • MARCH 27, 2009 SECOND FRONT PAGE 3 LIFE WILL BE VICTORIOUS Governor’s claim of reducing abortions deserves closer scrutiny Mother Teresa’s his week, I complete places no limits on the free expression Sebelius claim that she accepts T of religious groups or religious leaders Catholic teaching because she main - rosary gives my answers to some because they are religious. tains that she is personally opposed of the questions that have The Catholic Church in the United to abortion. Why is this not suffi - States under the leadership of its first cient? comfort to those arisen because of my bishop, Archbishop John Carroll of comments on the nomi - Baltimore, chose not to engage in par - A. Governor Sebelius has been a tisan politics. Archbishop Carroll, as featured speaker for Planned nation by President well as succeeding generations of Parenthood, the largest abortion in difficult times American Catholic bishops, did not provider in the United States. She has Obama of Governor abortions, but in the context of where consider it prudent to tie the church’s been endorsed by Emily’s List, a politi - fort and assurance that their “absolute personal opposition to credibility to any politician or political cal action committee that only sup - By JOHN HEUERTZ Kathleen Sebelius to God is still with us,” said procured abortion was well-known.” party. Thus, the church has requested ports candidates who support state- Special to The Leaven Good Shepherd’s director serve as the next secre - In the case of Governor Sebelius, the that her pastors not engage in partisan sanctioned abortion. Governor of Caring Ministry, opposite is true. Her advocacy for le - politics by supporting particular candi - Sebelius has claimed that she has been SHAWNEE — How tary for Health and Bernadine Asher. “We at - galized abortion is well-known and a dates or political parties. a leader in keeping abortion legal. She could a modest plastic tribute the power to trust Human Services (HHS). matter of public record. has helped to raise funds for the rosary be such a comfort in God.” Q. Does the Church’s tax- Women’s Political Caucus whose first to the many people who Karen Roberts has used Q. Did not the policies of Q. Did not the governor support exempt status limit the free expres - criterion for candidate endorsement is have used it? Perhaps it the Mother Teresa rosary Governor Sebelius actually reduce a Kansas program to assist women sion of the church? support for legalized abortion. In fact, has something to do with at prayer vigils held in abortions in Kansas? who are choosing life for their un - the Women’s Political Caucus will not its previous owner — front of a local abortion born child? A. Yes. By accepting tax-exempt support a pro-life woman candidate Mother Teresa of clinic. A. It is true that the number of status, a church or any nonprofit ac - and will even support a pro-abortion Calcutta. “Sharing it with people abortions declined in Kansas in the A. Yes and no. This program was cepts the limitation of not participating male candidate over a pro-life female In 1981, a local is very special,” believes past six years, but they also declined already in place when Governor in partisan politics and is limited in the candidate. Catholic businessman the Good Shepherd throughout the nation. If Governor Sebelius was elected. Several years amount of resources that it can devote It is not acceptable for a Catholic to found himself praying the parishioner. “It’s very Sebelius wants to claim credit for re - ago, she vetoed this program, citing to lobbying. These tax-exempt restric - claim to be personally opposed to rosary with Mother Teresa special to hold on to the ducing abortions in Kansas, then by the need to reduce state spending. The tions correspond to the Catholic abortion while working to keep abor - and her companion Sister, rosary while you're pray - the same logic she has to accept re - next year, when the Legislature passed Church’s two-hundred-year-old inter - tion legal. The Catholic Church oppos - who were seated next to ing.” sponsibility for the state’s huge budget the program by a veto-proof margin, nal policy not to endorse political can - es abortion because every abortion de - him on a flight to Kansas Jason and Amy Specht, problems. While the governor may she signed it. The governor’s proposed didates or parties. Similarly, a very stroys an innocent human life, a truth City. When they finished, too, have often used the have done some things that positively budget again eliminates this program small percentage of the Catholic understandable, purely through rea - Mother Teresa gave him Mother Teresa rosary for and negatively affected both of these in 2010. What the governor chooses to Church’s resources are used for issue son. It is not morally coherent to be her rosary (see inset pho - their own special inten - events in Kansas, in actuality, the de - fund and not fund reveals her priori - advocacy. personally opposed to the destruction to) and predicted he’d tion — their infant son crease in abortions and our current ties. The church, however, has always of innocent human lives and at the pray it often in the future. Grady’s good health. economic woes are part of a much big - cherished its right and responsibility to same time support laws that protect He did. After about a “He has an inoperable ger picture. Q. Are your comments about address public policy issues with a abortionists and fail to protect inno - year, the businessman brain tumor called gangli - Certainly, the governor has support - Governor Sebelius’ nomination to moral dimension. The church could cent unborn children. and his wife lent the olioma,” explained Amy. ed some positive policies. For example, HHS a violation of the separation of never relinquish this right, even for the rosary to a family friend “He’s [already] had four I have praised the governor for her church and state? benefit of tax-exempt status. Conclusion: I hope that my an - who was seriously ill with surgeries and he’s only support for incentives to promote My statements and pastoral actions swers to the preceding questions have cancer. She recovered two and a half. He’s been adoption. Yet, in her career as a legis - A. The anti-establishment clause pertaining to Governor Sebelius were provided you with a better under - completely the following through a lot in his young lator and as the state’s chief executive, of the First Amendment is meant to to clarify Catholic teaching regarding standing of my rationale and motiva - year, and knew it was life.” Governor Sebelius opposed such mod - protect religious expression, not to the morality of abortion and its legal - tion for commenting on the nomina - time to pass the rosary The parish offered the est abortion legislation as parental no - limit it. Our Founding Fathers wished ization. They obviously were not timed tion of Governor Sebelius to serve as along to the next person rosary to the family for its tification for minors, informed consent to prevent the state from intervening to affect an election.
Recommended publications
  • Aid for Women V. Foulston: the Creation of a Minor's Right to Privacy and a New Preliminary Injunction Standard
    Denver Law Review Volume 84 Issue 3 Tenth Circuit Surveys Article 12 December 2020 Aid for Women v. Foulston: The Creation of a Minor's Right to Privacy and a New Preliminary Injunction Standard Todd Scardina Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/dlr Recommended Citation Todd Scardina, Aid for Women v. Foulston: The Creation of a Minor's Right to Privacy and a New Preliminary Injunction Standard , 84 Denv. U. L. Rev. 977 (2007). This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. AID FOR WOMEN V. FOULSTON: THE CREATION OF A MINOR'S RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND A NEW PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION STANDARD INTRODUCTION Forty-six percent of teens aged fifteen to nineteen have had sex at least once.' This startling statistic raises the question of how the state, which has an interest in protecting its youth, should deal with underage sex. Some people argue for promoting abstinence, others argue for pro- viding contraceptives; some argue for education in schools, others for parental education. There are a variety of ways to deal with the problem, and some are more controversial than others. Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline found one of the most controversial ways to protect teenagers from the harms of sex, implemented it in an attorney general opinion, and faced the inevitable public critique and lawsuits over his choice of protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Choice Violence and Intimidation
    Anti-Choice Violence and Intimidation A campaign of violence, vandalism, and intimidation is endangering providers and patients and curtailing the availability of abortion services. Since 1993, eight clinic workers – including four doctors, two clinic employees, a clinic escort, and a security guard – have been murdered in the United States.1 Seventeen attempted murders have also occurred since 1991.2 In fact, opponents of choice have directed more than 6,400 reported acts of violence against abortion providers since 1977, including bombings, arsons, death threats, kidnappings, and assaults, as well as more than 175,000 reported acts of disruption, including bomb threats and harassing calls.3 The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACE) provides federal protection against the unlawful and often violent tactics used by abortion opponents. Peaceful picketing and protest is not prohibited and is explicitly and fully protected by the law.4 State clinic protection laws in 16 states and the District of Columbia, as well as general statutes prohibiting violence, provide additional protection.5 Although the frequency of some types of clinic violence declined after the 1994 enactment of FACE, violence at reproductive-health centers is far from being eradicated.6 Vigorous enforcement of clinic-protection laws against those who use violence and threats is essential to protecting the lives and well-being of women and health-care providers. Abortion Providers and Other Health Professionals Face the Threat of Murder MURDERS: Since 1993, eight people have been murdered for helping women exercise their constitutionally protected right to choose.7 . 2009: The Murder of Dr. George Tiller.
    [Show full text]
  • Pbs Quarterly Program Topic Report
    July 2005 PBS QUARTERLY PROGRAM TOPIC REPORT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- QPTR Category: Abortion ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOLA Code: NOWD 000130C1 Series Title: NOW Distributor: PBS Release Date: 7/29/2005 7:30:00 PM Length: 30 Format: Interview/Discussion/Review; Magazine; News In a controversial reading of the state's statutory rape law, Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline has pushed to mandate reporting of any sexual activity of people under the age of 16 and subpoenaed medical records of abortion patients. Kline maintains he just wants to enforce the law and protect children, but critics charge that he's attacking a woman's right to an abortion and putting more kids at risk. NOW examines Kline's policies, which have made Kansas ground-zero for the reproductive rights debate in America. The report looks at both sides of the issue and at the implications for the nation. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- QPTR Category: Agriculture ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOLA Code: MLNH 008314C1 Series Title: The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer Distributor: PBS Release Date: 7/20/2005 6:00:00 PM Length: 60 Segment: 00:08:55 Format: Interview/Discussion/Review; News Cultivating Controversy: Betty Ann Bowser provides a report on Minnesota farmers' differing opinions on the Central American Free Trade Agreement. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Planned Parenthood V. American Coalition of Life Activists and the Need for a Reasonable Listener Standard
    Touro Law Review Volume 29 Number 2 Article 13 October 2013 Speech as a Weapon: Planned Parenthood v. American Coalition of Life Activists and the Need for a Reasonable Listener Standard Alex J. Berkman Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Law and Society Commons, Medical Jurisprudence Commons, and the Privacy Law Commons Recommended Citation Berkman, Alex J. (2013) "Speech as a Weapon: Planned Parenthood v. American Coalition of Life Activists and the Need for a Reasonable Listener Standard," Touro Law Review: Vol. 29 : No. 2 , Article 13. Available at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview/vol29/iss2/13 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Touro Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Speech as a Weapon: Planned Parenthood v. American Coalition of Life Activists and the Need for a Reasonable Listener Standard Cover Page Footnote 29-2 This comment is available in Touro Law Review: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview/vol29/iss2/13 Berkman: Speech as a Weapon SPEECH AS A WEAPON: PLANNED PARENTHOOD V. AMERICAN COALITION OF LIFE ACTIVISTS AND THE NEED FOR A REASONABLE LISTENER STANDARD Alex J. Berkman* ** I. INTRODUCTION On May 31, 2009, Dr. George Tiller was shot and killed at his church in Kansas.1 Prior to his death, Dr. Tiller, one of the nation‘s only late-term abortion providers, was regularly targeted by anti- abortion extremist groups.2 Along with other physicians, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Billboard ”Truthtruckâ”To Rain on Sebelius Inaugural
    Billboard ÂTruth Truck to Rain on Sebelius Inaugural Operation Rescue West Press Release (PRWEB) January 15, 2003 -- Operation Rescue West P.O. Box 601150 Sacramento, CA 95860 www.operationrescue.org 800-705-1175 January 12, 2003 Media Advisory For Immediate Release Local Contact: Troy Newman, (316) 841-1700 [email protected] Billboard ÂTruth Truck to Rain on Sebelius Inaugural Topeka, KS- The anti-abortion billboard truck known as the ÂTruth Truck will be accompanying the inaugural festivities in Topeka, Kansas, today and tomorrow. The huge graphic pictures covering the truck are representative of the children who are murdered here in Kansas. Wichita,, Kansas is known world-wide as the abortion capitol of the world due to the infamous work of late-term abortionist George Tiller. Tiller contributed over $10,000 to the Sebelius campaign and ran a political action committee that pumped over $450,000 in to defeating Sebelius rival for governor, Tim Shallenburger. Sebelius is long known for her radical leftist political views including abortion rights. Sebelius unashamedly declares, ÂI am proudly pro-choice. Therefore, Operation Rescue West has vowed to hound and dog her every move. The inaugural party will be visited by the Truth Truck laden with pro-life signs, literature, and pictures of aborted children. Operation Rescue West asks those hosting the inaugural celebrations to cancel and withdraw support from the pro-baby killer Sebelius. The Truth Truck will be stationed outside the Assumption Church across from the Capitol building on Monday morning at 9:30am protesting the Interfaith Spiritual Services. All those opposed to child-killing are invited to join the truth team.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 ANNUAL REPORT Consumer Protection & Antitrust Division Office
    2005 ANNUAL REPORT Consumer Protection & Antitrust Division Office of Attorney General Phill Kline STATE OF KANSAS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 120 SW 10TH AVE .• 2ND FLOOR CONSUMER PROTECTION AND ANTITRUST DIVISION PHILL KLINE TOPEKA. KS 66612-1597 (785) 296-3751 • FAX (785) 291-3699 ATTORNEY GENERAL CONSUMER HOTLINE (800) 432-231 0 WWW.KSAG.ORG October 30,2006 TO: The Honorable Kathleen Sebelius, Governor and Members of the Kansas Legislature I am pleased to submit the following report detailing the recent activities of my Consumer Protection and Antitrust Division pursuant to the directive set forth in the Kansas Consumer Protection Act (KCPA) at K.S.A. 50-628(a)(6). This report also includes a detailed presentation of the "investigatory and enforcement procedures and polices" of the Division, as directed by K.S.A. 50-628(b). Pursuant to these statutes, the following series of reports highlight both the 2005 Annual . Report and the significant, positive changes in the procedures and policies of the Consumer Protection and Antitrust Division since January, 2003. As I have noted in previous reports on this important Division of the Office of the Attorney General, managerial philosophy is an important foundation to good governance. The philosophy of the Consumer Protection and Antitrust Division is well presented in the reports included in this annual report. The Consumer Protection Division has an important role to play in Kansas commerce. By receiving and reviewing consumer complaints, the Division is best able to identify those businesses and merchants involved in acts that could best be described as polluting the stream of Kansas commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Mentor American Medical Association Journal of Ethics September 2014, Volume 16, Number 9: 671-781
    Virtual Mentor American Medical Association Journal of Ethics September 2014, Volume 16, Number 9: 671-781. September 2014 From Virtual Mentor Special Contributors Structural Competency Meets Structural Racism: Race, Politics, and the Structure of Medical Knowledge 674 Jonathan M. Metzl and Dorothy E. Roberts September Theme: Physicians as Agents of Social Change From the Editor Treating Presymptomatically 691 Audiey C. Kao Educating for Professionalism Ethics Cases Advocate as a Doctor or Advocate as a Citizen? 694 Commentary by Matthew Wynia A Call to Service: Social Justice is a Public Health Issue 699 Commentary by Martin Donohoe and Gordon Schiff Medical Students and Rights Campaigns 708 Commentary by Mark Kuczewski Podcast Physician Activism in Service to Humanity Interview with Rajiv Shah The Code Says The AMA Code of Medical Ethics’ Opinion on Physician Advocacy 712 Medical Education The Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program: Four Decades of Training Physicians as Agents of Change 713 Bharat Kumar www.virtualmentor.org Virtual Mentor, September 2014—Vol 16 671 Teaching Big in Texas: Team-Based Learning for Professionalism Education in Medical School 718 Rebecca Lunstroth and Eugene Boisaubin In the Literature Advocacy by Physicians for Patients and for Social Change 722 Joshua Freeman State of the Art and Science Greener Clinics, Better Care 726 Phil Perry Law, Policy, and Society Health Law Physicians, Medical Marijuana, and the Law 732 Joseph Gregorio Policy Forum Preventing Nuclear War: A Professional Responsibility
    [Show full text]
  • The Authority of Boards of County Commissioners in Kansas
    The Authority of Boards of County Commissioners in Kansas Making the Case for Clarity A paper authorized by the Kansas County Commissioners Association May, 2005 Prepared by Marla Flentje [email protected] THE AUTHORITY OF BOARDS OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IN KANSAS MAKNG THE CASE FOR CHANGE TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PAGES 3-5 BACKGROUND PAGES 6-9 PERSONNEL POLICIES AND COUNTY PAGE 10 COMMISSION AUTHORITY DEFINING THE PROBLEM PAGES 10-13 OPTIONS FOR CHANGE PAGES 13-14 THE CASE FOR CHANGE PAGES 14-17 THE COUNTY BUDGET AND COUNTY COMMISSION AUTHORITY PAGE 18 DEFINING THE PROBLEM PAGES 18-22 OPTIONS FOR CHANGE PAGES 23-26 THE CASE FOR CHANGE PAGES 27-30 ENDNOTES PAGES 30-31 The Authority of Boards of County Commissioners in Kansas Making the Case for Change Executive Summary Who’s in charge in the courthouse? Twenty-five years of legislative initiatives, state court rulings, including one from the Kansas Supreme Court, numerous opinions from the office of attorney general and innumerable courthouse conflicts have failed to clarify this basic governance question. The legislative authority of boards of county commissioners in Kansas remains imprecise and in dispute. Legal ambiguities surrounding the county commission’s authority, compounded by political competition for power from other elected county officers, result in wasted public resources, destructive organizational conflict and diminished public trust in county governments. Personnel Policies and County Commission Authority Defining the Problem In seemingly unequivocal language, state law grants county commissions authority to adopt personnel policies and pay plans for departments managed by sheriffs, clerks, treasurers and registers of deeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2006 TM The+ANSAS0ROSECUTOR#ASE-ANAGEMENT3YSTEM;+03=
    The Kansas Prosecutor The official publication of the Kansas County and District Attorneys Association Volume III, No. 1, Spring 2006 TM The+ANSAS0ROSECUTOR#ASE-ANAGEMENT3YSTEM;+03= Now Available--- The Next Level for Criminal Justice hDESIGNEDBY+ANSAS0ROSECUTORSFOR+ANSAS0ROSECUTORS KEEPINGTHEMONTHE FOREFRONTOFTECHNOLOGYv Gordon E. Lansford - Director of Kansas Criminal Justice Information System h4HISPROGRAMMAKESUPDATINGCASESASNAP!FEWCLICKSHEREANDTHEREAND YOUgREDONE.OMOREWASTINGTIMEFILLINGOUTJOURNALENTRIES DISMISSALS ETC 7ITHINAMINUTETHEYAREDONE)TgSGREATv Tonia Driggs, Legal Secretary 4HESOFTWAREISVERYINTUITIVEANDEASYTOLEARNHOWTOUSE7ITHVERYLITTLE TRAINING )WASABLETOBECOMEVERYCOMFORTABLEUSINGTHESOFTWAREWITHIN ABOUTAWEEK Patrick J. Cahill, Assistant County Attorney 7HATUSEDTOTAKEMEADAYANDAHALFTODO )CANNOWACCOMPLISHIN ONEAFTERNOON Bill Winzenburg, Victim/Witness Coordinator h4HEFUNCTIONALITYOF+03PROVIDESTHEEFFICIENCYNECESSARYTOACCURATELY CHARGEANDPROSECUTEANINDIVIDUALANDTRACKEVERYSTEPOFTHECASE )LOOKFORWARDTOTHEDATAEXCHANGEWITHTHECOURTSTOIMPROVEUPONTHE EFFICIENCYOFBOTHTHE&ULL#OURTAND+03PROGRAMSh Kathy Carpenter, Office Manager To learn how FullCase (KPS) can improve your office productivity; and, for addi- tional information or product demonstration contact Justice Systems. * For federal funding opportunities contact Gordon Lansford, Director of KCJIS - [785] 633-7700. 4600 McLeod NE, Albuquerque, NM. 87109 - [505] 883-3987 ¸ www.justicesystems.com The Kansas Prosecutor The official publication of the Kansas The Kansas Prosecutor County and
    [Show full text]
  • The Force of the Better Argument: Americans Can Learn Something from Jürgen Habermas and “Deliberative Democracy”
    Open Journal of Philosophy, 2016, 6, 215-238 Published Online August 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojpp http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2016.63021 The Force of the Better Argument: Americans Can Learn Something from Jürgen Habermas and “Deliberative Democracy” Robert E. Ferrell1, Joe Old2 1Philosophy Department, El Paso Community College, El Paso, TX, USA 2(Retired) English Department, El Paso Community College, El Paso, TX, USA Received 6 May 2016; accepted 20 June 2016; published 23 June 2016 Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract The 2016 American political season offers an opportunity to think about American “democracy” and compare it, in particular, to the “deliberative democracy” of the German philosopher and so- ciologist Jürgen Habermas, to see whether the somewhat smug belief in “American exceptionalism” holds up. Many Americans uncritically believe their system of government is the model for the world. However, a comparison of that system, which almost daily draws comment that it must have sunk to its historic low (Goldberg, 2016), suggests there may be a superior way. Habermas, widely considered to be one of the most important philosophers working in the world today (Bohman & Rehg, 2014), claims that deliberative democracy is a better way informed by commu- nicative action theory and the principles of discourse ethics. This paper, an exercise
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal No. 11-106870-S in the SUPREME COURT of KANSAS IN
    Appeal No. 11-106870-S IN THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS IN THE MATTER OF : : DA 10088 and DA 10598 : PHILLIP D. KLINE, : : Respondent. : _________________________________________________________ MOTION OF RESPONDENT PHILLIP D. KLINE FOR THE RECUSAL OF JUDGE KAREN ARNOLD-BURGER _________________________________________________________ Respondent Phillip D. Kline, former Attorney General the State of Kansas, hereby moves for the recusal of Judge Karen Arnold-Burger from any further participation in this appeal. Per the Order of Presiding Justice Daniel Biles on June 4, 2012, Judge Arnold-Burger is one of five Kansas judges assigned to hear this appeal in the aftermath of the May 18, 2012 recusal of five sitting justices of this Court. I. Introduction. As editor of The Verdict, the official quarterly publication of the Kansas Municipal Judges Association (“KMJA”), Judge Karen Arnold-Burger was instrumental in publishing numerous false statements regarding Mr. Kline’s investigation of Kansas abortion clinics. These false statements about facts at issue in this proceeding provide a reasonable basis to question Judge Arnold-Burger’s impartiality, thereby requiring recusal. See Kansas Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 3(E)(1) (1995). Specifically, a synopsis of Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood v. Kline, 287 Kan. 372, 433, 197 P.3d 370 (2008) (hereinafter CHPP v. Kline) in the Winter 2009 edition of The Verdict made numerous false assertions supported neither by the CHPP v. Kline opinion itself nor the underlying facts.1 Most of these gratuitous and untrue statements improperly cast Mr. Kline’s conduct in a false negative light and uniformly tended to disparage him before the Kansas judiciary.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Mentor Ethics Journal of the American Medical Association March 2005, Volume 7, Number 3
    Virtual Mentor Ethics Journal of the American Medical Association March 2005, Volume 7, Number 3 Case in Health Law Must Doctors Report Underage Sex as Abuse? by Kate Karas Medicine and politics can be contentious bed fellows. In 2003, the Kansas attorney general issued an opinion embedding physicians with law enforcement [1]. The opinion obligated a physician to report any evidence of underage sexual activity to social services, facing criminal sanctions should he or she fail to do so. The 14-year- old patient who inquired about birth control methods, the physical examination that revealed sexual activity—both occurrences mandated that the doctor breach patient confidentiality and turn the cases over to Kansas Social and Rehabilitative Services. That the activity was consensual and between age mates was immaterial. Physicians have long been included in state child abuse reporting statutes as mandatory reporters of suspected child abuse. All states require that persons named by statute (eg parents, physicians, teachers, etc) who suspect child abuse report the case to the particular social welfare agency charged with protecting children. In every state, it is within the physician's discretion to determine when a harm has occurred, and, thus, when his or her duties under the reporting statute. Kansas Statute § 38-1522 is the local version of the national statute: it names physicians as mandatory reporters of suspected child abuse. Failure to do so is a class B misdemeanor. In addition to the reporting requirement, Kansas Statutory Code imposes criminal penalties on those who engage in sexual intercourse with a minor younger than 14 years of age, regardless of whether the alleged perpetrator is also a minor.
    [Show full text]