Synergy of Experimental Rock Mechanics, Seismology, And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Synergy of Experimental Rock Mechanics, Seismology, And RESEARCH ARTICLE Synergy of Experimental Rock Mechanics, Seismology, 10.1029/2020JB019896 and Geodynamics Reveals Still Elusive Key Points: Upper Mantle Rheology • A new probabilistic geodynamic modeling approach is presented to tighten existing constraints on Chhavi Jain1,2 and Jun Korenaga1 olivine rheology • Radial anisotropy beneath the 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA, 2Department of Earth and Pacic plate provides an important Planetary Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA constraint on mantle rheology • Our analysis reinforces the possibility of strong shear flow beneath the Pacific plate Abstract We present a novel geodynamic approach that can potentially tighten existing constraints on mantle rheology. This new approach, which we call probabilistic geodynamic modeling, is applied here to the rheology of the upper mantle. We combine the numerical modeling of plate-driven corner flow and the Supporting Information: • Supporting Information S1 seismic observation of radial anisotropy, aiming to reduce substantial uncertainties associated with experimentally derived flow laws, but our results also highlight the complex competition among different deformation mechanisms under mantle conditions. Despite the remaining rheological uncertainty, our Correspondence to: C. Jain, study suggests that significant background shear flow is required near the lithosphere-asthenosphere [email protected] boundary to explain the strong radial anisotropy observed at 100–200 km depth underneath the Pacific plate, and the plausible nature of this background flow is characterized using our new probabilistic Citation: approach. Our analysis also provides a new insight into the asthenospheric water content and the grain Jain, C., & Korenaga, J. (2020). size distribution in the upper mantle, but these results are also subject to nontrivial nonuniqueness. The Synergy of experimental rock merit of our probabilistic approach lies in its ability to assess the extent of such nonuniqueness, and we mechanics, seismology, and geodynamics reveals still elusive demonstrate this by quantifying the robustness of some of our results. upper mantle rheology. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125, Plain Language Summary A detailed understanding of how silicate minerals deform under e2020JB019896. https://doi.org/10. various conditions is central to conducting realistic simulations of mantle dynamics, but the currently 1029/2020JB019896 available experimental constraints on the flow laws of olivine, which is the dominant phase of the upper mantle, suffer from considerable uncertainties. We present a new kind of geodynamic modeling, which Received 2 APR 2020 can reduce such uncertainties by assimilating geophysical observations. Unlike previous similar attempts, Accepted 6 NOV 2020 Accepted article online 12 NOV 2020 our approach properly handles parameter uncertainties such that the flow laws under consideration remain consistent with experimental deformation data. Most important, our new approach provides a unifying framework to combine experimental rock mechanics, observational geophysics, and theoretical geodynamics in a self-consistent manner. 1. Introduction The knowledge of upper mantle rheology is crucial to our understanding of mantle convection and related tectonic processes that have shaped our environment. Because olivine is the most abundant and usually the weakest phase in the upper mantle (Karato & Wu, 1993), the rheology of olivine aggregates is considered to be representative of upper mantle rheology. Olivine primarily deforms by diffusion and dislocation creep mechanisms, and flow laws for these mechanisms have often been used to implement geodynamic models (e.g., Kneller et al., 2005; Rose & Korenaga, 2011; Zhong & Gurnis, 1996). Flow law parameters for these mechanisms are usually obtained from experimental deformation data of olivine aggregates. Because both diffusion and dislocation creep operate in parallel, however, delineating these two mechanisms from experi- mental data has been difficult. Our recent reanalysis of existing experimental data using a rigorous statistical framework, implemented by Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling, has revealed that, owing to the highly nonlinear nature of parameter estimation as well as large data uncertainties, some flow law param- eters are only poorly constrained (Jain et al., 2018, 2019). If these experimentally constrained flow laws are applied directly in geodynamic modeling, their uncertainties would yield too wide a range of viscosity pre- ©2020. American Geophysical Union. dictions to be useful. To design more realistic and reliable mantle dynamic models; therefore, it is necessary All Rights Reserved. to improve existing constraints on olivine rheology. JAIN AND KORENAGA 1of21 Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 10.1029/2020JB019896 Whereas experimental rock mechanics provides direct estimates on olivine rheology, additional constraints may be obtained from some geophysical observations. Olivine rheology influences many properties of the lithosphere and the upper mantle, such as seismic anisotropy and attenuation, convection planform, heat transport to the surface, and lithospheric flexure. Consequently, geophysical observations of these phenomena may be used to draw some inferences on upper mantle rheology. Some previous studies have indeed used geophysical data to constrain flow law parameters for olivine rheology. The most straightforward approach to conduct geophysical inversion is to run multiple forward geodynamic models assuming different rheological parameters for the upper mantle. The subset of param- eters that yield the smallest misfits to geophysical data may provide useful constraints on the flow law parameters for olivine rheology. A number of studies have implemented this approach with different geo- dynamical settings (e.g., Lee et al., 2011; van Hunen et al., 2005; Watts & Zhong, 2000). In particular, Alisic et al. (2012) tested a range of values for the stress exponent of dislocation creep in their global mantle flow model and compared their results with surface observables, such as plate velocity and the angle of subducting plates. The stress exponent was varied between 2 and 3.75 to explore the entire range of val- ues previously suggested for this parameter by experiment studies. Because each geodynamic simulation is time-consuming, only a few parameter values could be tested. Consequently, the uncertainty in the inversion result is difficult to assess. Recently, Baumann and Kaus (2015) presented a more intensive geodynamic inversion scheme based on Bayesian statistics, in which a diverse set of data, including topography, gravity, and surface velocity mea- surements, were simultaneously used to constrain all the flow law parameters for dislocation creep. A range of laboratory-derived estimates on the flow law parameters served as a priori bounds within which each parameter was allowed to vary. The multidimensional model space so defined was finely explored with the help of MCMC sampling. Approximately 2 × 106 forward models were conducted, and the resulting a posteriori probability distributions were used to determine the optimum values of all flow law parameters and the associated uncertainty. Despite its high computational cost, this approach allows for an exhaus- tive search of the multidimensional model domain and also provides a way to account for uncertainties in geophysical data. Worthen et al. (2014) suggested a computationally less expensive, adjoint-based inversion method that uses surface plate velocities as constraints to estimate the flow law parameters for dislocation creep in olivine. Instead of sampling a range of values for the unknown flow law parameters, the adjoint-based approach iteratively solves for the minimum in the cost or the misfit function and computes the gradients of the cost function to guide its search for the “best fit” solution. This reduces the number of iterations needed to reach a convergent solution. Li et al. (2017) made improvements to the adjoint-based inversion technique and elucidated its application by modeling time-dependent mantle convection with nonlinear rheology. Their inversion scheme could successfully reproduce the expected values of the stress exponent and the scalar coefficient for dislocation creep in the upper mantle. However, it is difficult to assess the efficiency and the success of the technique in the case where more realistic mantle rheologies, such as a composite flow law with both diffusion and dislocation creep, are assumed and all the flow law parameters, including the activation energies and volumes, are inverted for. Moreover, in these studies, little importance is given to laboratory-derived estimates on the flow law parameters. Even though experimental results are associated with large uncertainties, they are nonetheless the most direct measure of olivine rheology, and it would be beneficial for a geophysical inversion scheme to give some weightage to this information. For example, the adjoint-based inversion scheme of Ratnaswamy et al. (2015) has a provision to incorporate this information as a priori knowledge. Yet another approach to geophysical inversion was presented by Yang and Gurnis (2016). Here, the radial and lateral viscosity variation in the mantle were investigated based on the observations of long-wavelength geoid, free-air gravity anomaly, gravity gradients, and residual topography.
Recommended publications
  • Summary of the New W4300 Course in DEES: “The Earth's Deep Interior” Instructor: Paul G
    Summary of the new W4300 course in DEES: “The Earth's Deep Interior” Instructor: Paul G. Richards ([email protected]) This course emphasizes the geophysical study of Earth structure below the crust, drawing upon geodesy, geomagnetism, gravity, thermal studies, seismology, and some geochemistry. It covers the principal techniques by which discoveries have been made in deep Earth structure, and describes particular features of the mantle, and fluid and solid cores, such as: • the upper mantle beneath old and young oceans and continents • the transition zone in the mantle between about 400 and 700 km depth (within which density and elastic moduli increase anomalously with depth), • the lowermost mantle and core/mantle boundary (across which density doubles and sound speed halves), and • the outer core/inner core boundary (discovered by seismology, and profoundly affecting the Earth's magnetic field). The course is part of the core curriculum for graduate students in solid Earth geophysics and marine geophysics, is an elective for solid Earth geochemistry and geology, and is accessible to undergraduate science majors with adequate math and physics. The course, together with EESC W 4950x (Math Methods in the Earth Sciences), replaces the previous W 4945x – 4946y (Geophysical Theory I and II). It includes parts of previous courses (no longer listed) in seismology, geomagnetism, and thermal history. Emphasis is on current structure, rather than evaluation of dynamic processes (such as convection). Prerequisites calculus, differential
    [Show full text]
  • GLY5455 Introduction to Geophysics/Geodynamics Syllabus Fall 2015 Instructor: Mark Panning Location: Williamson 218 Time: Tuesday and Thursday, 1:55-3:10Pm
    GLY5455 Introduction to Geophysics/Geodynamics Syllabus Fall 2015 Instructor: Mark Panning Location: Williamson 218 Time: Tuesday and Thursday, 1:55-3:10pm Contact Info Office: 229 Williamson Hall Phone: 392-2634 Email: [email protected] Office hours: Can be arranged at any time via email Textbook Turcotte & Schubert, Geodynamics, 3rd Edition (required) We will also be pulling material from the following books (not required) Physics of the Earth, Stacey and Davis (2008) The Magnetic Field of the Earth, Merrill, McElhinny, and McFadden (1996) Introduction to Seismology, Shearer (2006) Pre-reqs You will ideally have completed 1 year of calculus and a semester of physics. This class will deal with vector calculus… if this worries you, check out div grad curl and all that, by H.M. Schey (available for around $30 online). Grading 60% Homework 20% Midterm 20% Final Course topics (roughly 2-3 weeks per topic… but very flexible!) Topic Text Gravity Ch. 5 + other notes Heat Ch. 4 Magnetism Material from The Magnetic Field of the Earth Seismology Ch. 2, 3, and material from Introduction to Seismology Plate Tectonics & Mantle Geodynamics Ch. 1,6,7 Geophysical inverse theory (if time allows) Outside readings TBA Class notes Lecture notes will be distributed, sometimes before the material is covered in lecture, and sometimes after. Regardless, as always, such notes are meant to be supplementary to your own notes. I may cover things not in the distributed notes, and likewise may not cover everything in lecture that is included in the notes. Homework The first homework assignment will be assigned in week 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Geodynamics and Rate of Volcanism on Massive Earth-Like Planets
    The Astrophysical Journal, 700:1732–1749, 2009 August 1 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1732 C 2009. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. GEODYNAMICS AND RATE OF VOLCANISM ON MASSIVE EARTH-LIKE PLANETS E. S. Kite1,3, M. Manga1,3, and E. Gaidos2 1 Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA Received 2008 September 12; accepted 2009 May 29; published 2009 July 16 ABSTRACT We provide estimates of volcanism versus time for planets with Earth-like composition and masses 0.25–25 M⊕, as a step toward predicting atmospheric mass on extrasolar rocky planets. Volcanism requires melting of the silicate mantle. We use a thermal evolution model, calibrated against Earth, in combination with standard melting models, to explore the dependence of convection-driven decompression mantle melting on planet mass. We show that (1) volcanism is likely to proceed on massive planets with plate tectonics over the main-sequence lifetime of the parent star; (2) crustal thickness (and melting rate normalized to planet mass) is weakly dependent on planet mass; (3) stagnant lid planets live fast (they have higher rates of melting than their plate tectonic counterparts early in their thermal evolution), but die young (melting shuts down after a few Gyr); (4) plate tectonics may not operate on high-mass planets because of the production of buoyant crust which is difficult to subduct; and (5) melting is necessary but insufficient for efficient volcanic degassing—volatiles partition into the earliest, deepest melts, which may be denser than the residue and sink to the base of the mantle on young, massive planets.
    [Show full text]
  • Gji-Keyword-List-Updated2016.Pdf
    COMPOSITION and PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Composition and structure of the continental crust Composition and structure of the core Composition and structure of the mantle Composition and structure of the oceanic crust Composition of the planets Creep and deformation Defects Elasticity and anelasticity Electrical properties Equations of state Fault zone rheology Fracture and flow Friction High-pressure behaviour Magnetic properties Microstructure Permeability and porosity Phase transitions Plasticity, diffusion, and creep GENERAL SUBJECTS Core Gas and hydrate systems Geomechanics Geomorphology Glaciology Heat flow Hydrogeophysics Hydrology Hydrothermal systems Instrumental noise Ionosphere/atmosphere interactions Ionosphere/magnetosphere interactions Mantle processes Ocean drilling Structure of the Earth Thermochronology Tsunamis Ultra-high pressure metamorphism Ultra-high temperature metamorphism GEODESY and GRAVITY Acoustic-gravity waves Earth rotation variations Geodetic instrumentation Geopotential theory Global change from geodesy Gravity anomalies and Earth structure Loading of the Earth Lunar and planetary geodesy and gravity Plate motions Radar interferometry Reference systems Satellite geodesy Satellite gravity Sea level change Seismic cycle Space geodetic surveys Tides and planetary waves Time variable gravity Transient deformation GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION Africa Antarctica Arctic region Asia Atlantic Ocean Australia Europe Indian Ocean Japan New Zealand North America Pacific Ocean South America GEOMAGNETISM and ELECTROMAGNETISM Archaeomagnetism
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Evolution of the Red Sea: Historical Background, Review and Synthesis
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277310102 Geological Evolution of the Red Sea: Historical Background, Review and Synthesis Chapter · January 2015 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-45201-1_3 CITATIONS READS 6 911 1 author: William Bosworth Apache Egypt Companies 70 PUBLICATIONS 2,954 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Near and Middle East and Eastern Africa: Tectonics, geodynamics, satellite gravimetry, magnetic (airborne and satellite), paleomagnetic reconstructions, thermics, seismics, seismology, 3D gravity- magnetic field modeling, GPS, different transformations and filtering, advanced integrated examination. View project Neotectonics of the Red Sea rift system View project All content following this page was uploaded by William Bosworth on 28 May 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Geological Evolution of the Red Sea: Historical Background, Review, and Synthesis William Bosworth Abstract The Red Sea is part of an extensive rift system that includes from south to north the oceanic Sheba Ridge, the Gulf of Aden, the Afar region, the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aqaba, the Gulf of Suez, and the Cairo basalt province. Historical interest in this area has stemmed from many causes with diverse objectives, but it is best known as a potential model for how continental lithosphere first ruptures and then evolves to oceanic spreading, a key segment of the Wilson cycle and plate tectonics.
    [Show full text]
  • PEAT8002 - SEISMOLOGY Lecture 13: Earthquake Magnitudes and Moment
    PEAT8002 - SEISMOLOGY Lecture 13: Earthquake magnitudes and moment Nick Rawlinson Research School of Earth Sciences Australian National University Earthquake magnitudes and moment Introduction In the last two lectures, the effects of the source rupture process on the pattern of radiated seismic energy was discussed. However, even before earthquake mechanisms were studied, the priority of seismologists, after locating an earthquake, was to quantify their size, both for scientific purposes and hazard assessment. The first measure introduced was the magnitude, which is based on the amplitude of the emanating waves recorded on a seismogram. The idea is that the wave amplitude reflects the earthquake size once the amplitudes are corrected for the decrease with distance due to geometric spreading and attenuation. Earthquake magnitudes and moment Introduction Magnitude scales thus have the general form: A M = log + F(h, ∆) + C T where A is the amplitude of the signal, T is its dominant period, F is a correction for the variation of amplitude with the earthquake’s depth h and angular distance ∆ from the seismometer, and C is a regional scaling factor. Magnitude scales are logarithmic, so an increase in one unit e.g. from 5 to 6, indicates a ten-fold increase in seismic wave amplitude. Note that since a log10 scale is used, magnitudes can be negative for very small displacements. For example, a magnitude -1 earthquake might correspond to a hammer blow. Earthquake magnitudes and moment Richter magnitude The concept of earthquake magnitude was introduced by Charles Richter in 1935 for southern California earthquakes. He originally defined earthquake magnitude as the logarithm (to the base 10) of maximum amplitude measured in microns on the record of a standard torsion seismograph with a pendulum period of 0.8 s, magnification of 2800, and damping factor 0.8, located at a distance of 100 km from the epicenter.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Electric and Magnetic Signals Observed Before the Arrival of Seismic Wave
    E-LETTER Earth Planets Space, 54, e9–e12, 2002 Small electric and magnetic signals observed before the arrival of seismic wave Y. Honkura1, M. Matsushima1, N. Oshiman2,M.K.Tunc¸er3,S¸. Baris¸3,A.Ito4,Y.Iio2, and A. M. Is¸ikara3 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan 2Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan 3Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Bogazic¸i˘ University, Istanbul 81220, Turkey 4Faculty of Education, Utsunomiya University, Utsunomiya 321-8505, Japan (Received September 10, 2002; Revised November 14, 2002; Accepted December 6, 2002) Electric and magnetic data were obtained above the focal area in association with the 1999 Izmit, Turkey earthquake. The acquired data are extremely important for studies of electromagnetic phenomena associated with earthquakes, which have attracted much attention even without clear physical understanding of their characteristics. We have already reported that large electric and magnetic variations observed during the earthquake were simply due to seismic waves through the mechanism of seismic dynamo effect, because they appeared neither before nor simultaneously with the origin time of the earthquake but a few seconds later, with the arrival of seismic wave. In this letter we show the result of our further analyses. Our detailed examination of the electric and magnetic data disclosed small signals appearing less than one second before the large signals associated with the seismic waves. It is not yet solved whether this observational fact is simply one aspect of the seismic dynamo effect or requires a new mechanism. Key words: Izmit earthquake, seismic dynamo effect, seismic wave, electric and magnetic changes 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper 4: Seismic Methods for Determining Earthquake Source
    Paper 4: Seismic methods for determining earthquake source parameters and lithospheric structure WALTER D. MOONEY U.S. Geological Survey, MS 977, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025 For referring to this paper: Mooney, W. D., 1989, Seismic methods for determining earthquake source parameters and lithospheric structure, in Pakiser, L. C., and Mooney, W. D., Geophysical framework of the continental United States: Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America Memoir 172. ABSTRACT The seismologic methods most commonly used in studies of earthquakes and the structure of the continental lithosphere are reviewed in three main sections: earthquake source parameter determinations, the determination of earth structure using natural sources, and controlled-source seismology. The emphasis in each section is on a description of data, the principles behind the analysis techniques, and the assumptions and uncertainties in interpretation. Rather than focusing on future directions in seismology, the goal here is to summarize past and current practice as a companion to the review papers in this volume. Reliable earthquake hypocenters and focal mechanisms require seismograph locations with a broad distribution in azimuth and distance from the earthquakes; a recording within one focal depth of the epicenter provides excellent hypocentral depth control. For earthquakes of magnitude greater than 4.5, waveform modeling methods may be used to determine source parameters. The seismic moment tensor provides the most complete and accurate measure of earthquake source parameters, and offers a dynamic picture of the faulting process. Methods for determining the Earth's structure from natural sources exist for local, regional, and teleseismic sources. One-dimensional models of structure are obtained from body and surface waves using both forward and inverse modeling.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Geodynamics: Fourier Transform Methods
    Advanced Geodynamics: Fourier Transform Methods David T. Sandwell January 13, 2021 To Susan, Katie, Melissa, Nick, and Cassie Eddie Would Go Preprint for publication by Cambridge University Press, October 16, 2020 Contents 1 Observations Related to Plate Tectonics 7 1.1 Global Maps . .7 1.2 Exercises . .9 2 Fourier Transform Methods in Geophysics 20 2.1 Introduction . 20 2.2 Definitions of Fourier Transforms . 21 2.3 Fourier Sine and Cosine Transforms . 22 2.4 Examples of Fourier Transforms . 23 2.5 Properties of Fourier transforms . 26 2.6 Solving a Linear PDE Using Fourier Methods and the Cauchy Residue Theorem . 29 2.7 Fourier Series . 32 2.8 Exercises . 33 3 Plate Kinematics 36 3.1 Plate Motions on a Flat Earth . 36 3.2 Triple Junction . 37 3.3 Plate Motions on a Sphere . 41 3.4 Velocity Azimuth . 44 3.5 Recipe for Computing Velocity Magnitude . 45 3.6 Triple Junctions on a Sphere . 45 3.7 Hot Spots and Absolute Plate Motions . 46 3.8 Exercises . 46 4 Marine Magnetic Anomalies 48 4.1 Introduction . 48 4.2 Crustal Magnetization at a Spreading Ridge . 48 4.3 Uniformly Magnetized Block . 52 4.4 Anomalies in the Earth’s Magnetic Field . 52 4.5 Magnetic Anomalies Due to Seafloor Spreading . 53 4.6 Discussion . 58 4.7 Exercises . 59 ii CONTENTS iii 5 Cooling of the Oceanic Lithosphere 61 5.1 Introduction . 61 5.2 Temperature versus Depth and Age . 65 5.3 Heat Flow versus Age . 66 5.4 Thermal Subsidence . 68 5.5 The Plate Cooling Model .
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Geodynamics the Interdisciplinary Role of Space
    Journal of Geodynamics 49 (2010) 112–115 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Geodynamics journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jog The interdisciplinary role of space geodesy—Revisited Reiner Rummel Institute of Astronomical and Physical Geodesy (IAPG), Technische Universität München, Arcisstr. 21, 80290 München, Germany article info abstract Article history: In 1988 the interdisciplinary role of space geodesy has been discussed by a prominent group of leaders in Received 26 January 2009 the fields of geodesy and geophysics at an international workshop in Erice (Mueller and Zerbini, 1989). Received in revised form 4 August 2009 The workshop may be viewed as the starting point of a new era of geodesy as a discipline of Earth Accepted 6 October 2009 sciences. Since then enormous progress has been made in geodesy in terms of satellite and sensor systems, observation techniques, data processing, modelling and interpretation. The establishment of a Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) which is currently underway is a milestone in this respect. Wegener Keywords: served as an important role model for the definition of GGOS. In turn, Wegener will benefit from becoming Geodesy Satellite geodesy a regional entity of GGOS. −9 Global observing system What are the great challenges of the realisation of a 10 global integrated observing system? Geodesy Global Geodetic Observing System is potentially able to provide – in the narrow sense of the words – “metric and weight” to global studies of geo-processes. It certainly can meet this expectation if a number of fundamental challenges, related to issues such as the international embedding of GGOS, the realisation of further satellite missions and some open scientific questions can be solved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relation Between Mantle Dynamics and Plate Tectonics
    The History and Dynamics of Global Plate Motions, GEOPHYSICAL MONOGRAPH 121, M. Richards, R. Gordon and R. van der Hilst, eds., American Geophysical Union, pp5–46, 2000 The Relation Between Mantle Dynamics and Plate Tectonics: A Primer David Bercovici , Yanick Ricard Laboratoire des Sciences de la Terre, Ecole Normale Superieure´ de Lyon, France Mark A. Richards Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of California, Berkeley Abstract. We present an overview of the relation between mantle dynam- ics and plate tectonics, adopting the perspective that the plates are the surface manifestation, i.e., the top thermal boundary layer, of mantle convection. We review how simple convection pertains to plate formation, regarding the aspect ratio of convection cells; the forces that drive convection; and how internal heating and temperature-dependent viscosity affect convection. We examine how well basic convection explains plate tectonics, arguing that basic plate forces, slab pull and ridge push, are convective forces; that sea-floor struc- ture is characteristic of thermal boundary layers; that slab-like downwellings are common in simple convective flow; and that slab and plume fluxes agree with models of internally heated convection. Temperature-dependent vis- cosity, or an internal resistive boundary (e.g., a viscosity jump and/or phase transition at 660km depth) can also lead to large, plate sized convection cells. Finally, we survey the aspects of plate tectonics that are poorly explained by simple convection theory, and the progress being made in accounting for them. We examine non-convective plate forces; dynamic topography; the deviations of seafloor structure from that of a thermal boundary layer; and abrupt plate- motion changes.
    [Show full text]
  • PEAT8002 - SEISMOLOGY Lecture 11: Earthquake Source Mechanisms and Radiation Patterns I
    PEAT8002 - SEISMOLOGY Lecture 11: Earthquake source mechanisms and radiation patterns I Nick Rawlinson Research School of Earth Sciences Australian National University Earthquake sources Introduction In the next two lectures, we will study the generation of seismic waves, and how they are used to study earthquakes. Earthquakes almost always occur on faults, which represent the boundary between two rigid media that are capable of relative motion. Earthquakes that occur on land and close enough to the surface often leave visible evidence in the form of ground dislocation e.g. the San Andreas fault. One of the first major breakthroughs in understanding earthquake mechanisms was the proposal of the so-called elastic rebound theory of earthquakes on a fault. Earthquake sources Introduction Illustration of the elastic rebound theory. Material on either side of the fault deforms in response to stress, but friction on the fault locks it in place. Eventually, the strain accumulation is more than the rocks on the fault can withstand, and the fault slips, resulting in an earthquake. Earthquake sources Introduction The elastic rebound idea was a major conceptual breakthrough, because the faulting seen at the surface had previously been regarded as an incidental side-effect of an earthquake, rather than its cause. The largest earthquakes typically occur at plate boundaries. From the perspective of elastic rebound theory, they represent the most dramatic part of the seismic cycle. During the interseismic stage, steady motion occurs away from the fault, but the fault itself is “locked". Immediately prior to rupture, there is the preseismic stage that can be associated with small earthquakes (foreshocks) or other possible precursory effects.
    [Show full text]