DOCSLIB.ORG

The Gribov Problem and QCD Dynamics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Gribov Problem and QCD Dynamics The Gribov problem and QCD dynamics N. Vandersickel 1 a, Daniel Zwanziger 2 b a Ghent University, Department of Mathematical Physics and Astronomy Krijgslaan 281-S9, 9000 Gent,Belgium b New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA arXiv:1202.1491v2 [hep-th] 25 Apr 2012 [email protected] [email protected] Abstract In 1967, Faddeev and Popov were able to quantize the Yang-Mills theory by introducing new particles called ghost through the introduction of a gauge. Ever since, this quantization has become a standard textbook item. Some years later, Gribov discovered that the gauge fixing was not complete, gauge copies called Gribov copies were still present and could affect the infrared region of quantities like the gauge dependent gluon and ghost propagator. This feature was often in literature related to con- finement. Some years later, the semi-classical approach of Gribov was generalized to all orders and the GZ action was born. Ever since, many related articles were published. This review tends to give a pedagogic review of the ideas of Gribov and the subsequent construction of the GZ action, including many other toipics related to the Gribov region. It is shown how the GZ action can be viewed as a non-perturbative tool which has relations with other approaches towards confinement. Many different features related to the GZ action shall be discussed in detail, such as BRST breaking, the KO cri- terion, the propagators, etc. We shall also compare with the lattice data and other non-perturbative approaches, including stochastic quantization. Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Patchwork quilt of QCD . .5 1.2 Gribov’s gluon confinement scenario . .6 1.3 Approaches to the confinement problem . .8 1.4 Outline of the article . .8 1.5 Limitations of the present approach . .9 1.6 The Yang-Mills theory: definitions and conventions . .9 2 From Gribov to the local action 12 2.1 The Faddeev-Popov quantization . 12 2.1.1 Zero modes . 12 2.1.2 A two dimensional example . 13 2.1.3 The Yang-Mills case . 15 2.1.4 Two important remarks concerning the Faddeev-Popov derivation . 18 2.1.5 Other gauges . 18 2.1.6 The BRST symmetry . 19 2.2 The Gribov problem . 20 2.2.1 The Gribov region: a possible solution to the Gribov problem? . 21 2.2.2 The fundamental modular region (FMR) . 25 2.2.3 Other solutions to the Gribov problem . 26 2.2.4 Summary . 27 2.3 The relation of the Gribov horizon to Abelian and center-vortex dominance . 27 2.4 Semi classical solution of Gribov . 30 2.4.1 The no-pole condition . 30 2.4.2 The gluon and the ghost propagator . 33 2.5 The local renormalizable action . 36 2.5.1 A toy model . 36 2.5.2 The non-local GZ action . 39 2.5.3 The local GZ action . 51 2.5.4 The gluon and the ghost propagator . 53 2.6 Algebraic renormalization of the GZ action . 56 2.6.1 The starting action and BRST . 56 2.6.2 The Ward identities . 59 2.6.3 The counter-term . 61 2.6.4 The renormalization factors . 63 2.7 Relation between Gribov no-pole condition and the GZ action . 64 2 3 Features of the GZ action 65 3.1 The propagators of the GZ action . 65 3.2 The transversality of the gluon propagator . 70 3.3 The hermiticity of the GZ action . 71 3.4 The soft breaking of the BRST symmetry . 71 3.4.1 The breaking . 71 3.4.2 The BRST breaking as a tool to prove that the Gribov parameter is a physical parameter . 72 3.4.3 The Maggiore-Schaden construction and spontaneous breaking of BRST sym- metry . 73 3.4.4 Local version of Maggiore-Schaden construction . 75 3.5 Restoring the BRST . 80 3.5.1 Adapting the BRST symmetry s is not possible . 80 3.5.2 Restoring the BRST by the introduction of new fields . 81 3.5.3 Two different phases of the restored BRST symmetry . 83 3.6 The GZ action and its relation to the Kugo-Ojima confinement criterion . 86 3.6.1 Introduction: the Kugo-Ojima criterion . 86 3.6.2 Remarks on the KO criteria . 87 3.6.3 Imposing u(0) = -1 as a boundary condition in the Faddeev-Popov action . 87 3.6.4 Conclusion . 87 3.7 The relation of the GZ action to the lattice data . 88 3.7.1 The lattice data . 88 3.7.2 Reflection positivity . 89 3.8 Color confinement . 90 3.8.1 Exact bounds on free energy . 90 3.8.2 Simple model . 93 4 Overview of various approaches to the Gribov problem 94 4.1 GZ action . 94 4.2 Refined GZ action . 95 4.3 Coulomb gauge . 95 4.4 Dyson-Schwinger equation . 95 4.5 Stochastic quantization . 97 4.5.1 Background . 97 4.5.2 Time-dependent approach . 99 4.5.3 Time-independent approach . 99 A Some formulae and extra calculations 102 A.1 Gaussian integrals . 102 A.1.1 Gaussian integral for scalar variables . 102 A.1.2 Gaussian integral for complex conjugated scalar variables . 102 A.1.3 Gaussian integral for Grassmann variables . 102 A.2 Dµ(A)w = 0 is a gauge invariant equation. 102 A.3 s decreases with increasing k2............................. 103 A.4 Determinant of Kµn ................................... 104 3 B Cohomologies and the doublet theorem 105 B.1 Cohomology . 105 B.2 Doublet theorem . 105 C Positivity and uniqueness of solution of time-independent Fokker-Planck equation 108 C.1 Positivity . 108 C.2 Uniqueness . 109 4 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Patchwork quilt of QCD Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) is the theory which describes the strong interaction, one of the four fundamental forces in our universe. This force describes the interactions between quarks and gluons, which are fundamental building blocks of our universe. At very high energies, QCD is asymptotically free, meaning that quarks and gluons behave like free particles1. However at low energies, i.e our daily world, due to the strong force, quarks and gluons interact and form bound states called hadrons. A well known example of these bound states are the proton and the neutron, but a whole zoo of hadrons has been observed in particle detectors. In fact, the only way to obtain information about the strong force is through bound states, as no free quark or gluon has even been detected. We call this phenomenon confinement. Although 40 years of intensive research have passed since the formulation of the standard model (which includes QCD), no good answer has been found to probably one of the most fundamental questions in QCD. Even the formulation of what confinement really is, is under discussion [1]. The difficulty for solving confinement lies in the fact that the standard techniques which have been so successful in QED, are not applicable in QCD. In QED the coupling constant is small enough2, so one can apply perturbation theory, which amounts to writing down a series in the coupling constant. In QCD, the coupling constant increases with decreasing energy, a phenomenon know as “infrared slavery”, and at low energy the coupling constant becomes too large and perturbation theory alone can never give a good description of the theory. Therefore, other techniques are required which we call non-perturbative methods. There exists a wide range of non-perturbative methods, which all try to approach QCD from one way or another. One should not see these different techniques as com- peting, but as patchwork trying to cover all aspects of QCD. Many different approaches have been developed to describe confinement, e.g. Abelian dominance [2, 3, 4], center-vortex dominance [5], light-cone dominance [6], the Kugo-Ojima confinement mechanism [7, 8], Wilson’s lattice gauge the- ory approach [9], and the approach initiated by Gribov [10]. The last approach has been elaborated in widely scattered articles, but it has not been reviewed, and the relation of different approaches is not well known. Let us mention that even if one omits quarks in QCD, one can still call the remaining theory con- 1E.g. in deep inelastic scattering (DIS) experiments, quarks can be treated as free particles. 2This depends of course on the energy range of interest. 5 fining. Although there is no real experimental evidence, because the theory of gluons without quarks is a gedankentheorie, lattice simulations have shown that gluons form bound states which we call glueballs, and no free gluon can occur. Therefore, it is of interest to investigate pure QCD without quarks, and try to find out what happens. One could say that confinement is hidden in the behavior of the gluons. 1.2 Gribov’s gluon confinement scenario The gauge concept was introduced into physics by Hermann Weyl to describe electromagnetism, by analogy with Einstein’s geometrical theory of gravity. According to Weyl, the vector potential Aµ(x) n is the electromagnetic analog of the transporter or Christoffel symbol Glµ of general relativity, and serves to transport the phase factor of a charged field. It is remarkable that the theories of the weak and strong interaction which have been developed since Weyl’s time and which, with electromag- netism, form the standard model, have also proven to be gauge theories. The group is extended from U(1) to SU(2) and, for QCD, SU(3), but these theories embody the geometrical gauge character intro- duced by Weyl. In particular they respect the principle of local gauge invariance in the same way that Einstein’s theory of gravity respects coordinate invariance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 18. Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics
    18. Lattice QCD 1 18. Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics Updated September 2017 by S. Hashimoto (KEK), J. Laiho (Syracuse University) and S.R. Sharpe (University of Washington). Many physical processes considered in the Review of Particle Properties (RPP) involve hadrons. The properties of hadrons—which are composed of quarks and gluons—are governed primarily by Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) (with small corrections from Quantum Electrodynamics [QED]). Theoretical calculations of these properties require non-perturbative methods, and Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics (LQCD) is a tool to carry out such calculations. It has been successfully applied to many properties of hadrons. Most important for the RPP are the calculation of electroweak form factors, which are needed to extract Cabbibo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix elements when combined with the corresponding experimental measurements. LQCD has also been used to determine other fundamental parameters of the standard model, in particular the strong coupling constant and quark masses, as well as to predict hadronic contributions to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, gµ 2. − This review describes the theoretical foundations of LQCD and sketches the methods used to calculate the quantities relevant for the RPP. It also describes the various sources of error that must be controlled in a LQCD calculation. Results for hadronic quantities are given in the corresponding dedicated reviews. 18.1. Lattice regularization of QCD Gauge theories form the building blocks of the Standard Model. While the SU(2) and U(1) parts have weak couplings and can be studied accurately with perturbative methods, the SU(3) component—QCD—is only amenable to a perturbative treatment at high energies.
    [Show full text]
  • General Properties of QCD
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-63148-8 - Quantum Chromodynamics: Perturbative and Nonperturbative Aspects B. L. Ioffe, V. S. Fadin and L. N. Lipatov Excerpt More information 1 General properties of QCD 1.1 QCD Lagrangian As in any gauge theory, the quantum chromodynamics (QCD) Lagrangian can be derived with the help of the gauge invariance principle from the free matter Lagrangian. Since quark fields enter the QCD Lagrangian additively, let us consider only one quark flavour. We will denote the quark field ψ(x), omitting spinor and colour indices [ψ(x) is a three- component column in colour space; each colour component is a four-component spinor]. The free quark Lagrangian is: Lq = ψ(x)(i ∂ − m)ψ(x), (1.1) where m is the quark mass, ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ = ∂µγµ = γµ = γ0 + γ . (1.2) ∂xµ ∂t ∂r The Lagrangian Lq is invariant under global (x–independent) gauge transformations + ψ(x) → Uψ(x), ψ(x) → ψ(x)U , (1.3) with unitary and unimodular matrices U + − U = U 1, |U|=1, (1.4) belonging to the fundamental representation of the colour group SU(3)c. The matrices U can be represented as U ≡ U(θ) = exp(iθata), (1.5) where θa are the gauge transformation parameters; the index a runs from 1 to 8; ta are the colour group generators in the fundamental representation; and ta = λa/2,λa are the Gell-Mann matrices. Invariance under the global gauge transformations (1.3) can be extended to local (x-dependent) ones, i.e. to those where θa in the transformation matrix (1.5) is a x-dependent.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0810.4453V1 [Hep-Ph] 24 Oct 2008
    The Physics of Glueballs Vincent Mathieu Groupe de Physique Nucl´eaire Th´eorique, Universit´e de Mons-Hainaut, Acad´emie universitaire Wallonie-Bruxelles, Place du Parc 20, BE-7000 Mons, Belgium. [email protected] Nikolai Kochelev Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow region, 141980 Russia. [email protected] Vicente Vento Departament de F´ısica Te`orica and Institut de F´ısica Corpuscular, Universitat de Val`encia-CSIC, E-46100 Burjassot (Valencia), Spain. [email protected] Glueballs are particles whose valence degrees of freedom are gluons and therefore in their descrip- tion the gauge field plays a dominant role. We review recent results in the physics of glueballs with the aim set on phenomenology and discuss the possibility of finding them in conventional hadronic experiments and in the Quark Gluon Plasma. In order to describe their properties we resort to a va- riety of theoretical treatments which include, lattice QCD, constituent models, AdS/QCD methods, and QCD sum rules. The review is supposed to be an informed guide to the literature. Therefore, we do not discuss in detail technical developments but refer the reader to the appropriate references. I. INTRODUCTION Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) is the theory of the hadronic interactions. It is an elegant theory whose full non perturbative solution has escaped our knowledge since its formulation more than 30 years ago.[1] The theory is asymptotically free[2, 3] and confining.[4] A particularly good test of our understanding of the nonperturbative aspects of QCD is to study particles where the gauge field plays a more important dynamical role than in the standard hadrons.
    [Show full text]
  • Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Particle Physics: a Case of Cross Fertilization
    SPONTANEOUS SYMMETRY BREAKING IN PARTICLE PHYSICS: A CASE OF CROSS FERTILIZATION Nobel Lecture, December 8, 2008 by Yoichiro Nambu*1 Department of Physics, Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, 5720 Ellis Avenue, Chicago, USA. I will begin with a short story about my background. I studied physics at the University of Tokyo. I was attracted to particle physics because of three famous names, Nishina, Tomonaga and Yukawa, who were the founders of particle physics in Japan. But these people were at different institutions than mine. On the other hand, condensed matter physics was pretty good at Tokyo. I got into particle physics only when I came back to Tokyo after the war. In hindsight, though, I must say that my early exposure to condensed matter physics has been quite beneficial to me. Particle physics is an outgrowth of nuclear physics, which began in the early 1930s with the discovery of the neutron by Chadwick, the invention of the cyclotron by Lawrence, and the ‘invention’ of meson theory by Yukawa [1]. The appearance of an ever increasing array of new particles in the sub- sequent decades and advances in quantum field theory gradually led to our understanding of the basic laws of nature, culminating in the present stan- dard model. When we faced those new particles, our first attempts were to make sense out of them by finding some regularities in their properties. Researchers in- voked the symmetry principle to classify them. A symmetry in physics leads to a conservation law. Some conservation laws are exact, like energy and electric charge, but these attempts were based on approximate similarities of masses and interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Quark and Gluon Structure from Lattice QCD
    Nuclear Quark and Gluon Structure from Lattice QCD Michael Wagman QCD Evolution 2018 !1 Nuclear Parton Structure 1) Nuclear physics adds “dirt”: — Nuclear effects obscure extraction of nucleon parton densities from nuclear targets (e.g. neutrino scattering) 2) Nuclear physics adds physics: — Do partons in nuclei exhibit novel collective phenomena? — Are gluons mostly inside nucleons in large nuclei? Colliders and Lattices Complementary roles in unraveling nuclear parton structure “Easy” for electron-ion collider: Near lightcone kinematics Electromagnetic charge weighted structure functions “Easy” for lattice QCD: Euclidean kinematics Uncharged particles, full spin and flavor decomposition of structure functions !3 Structure Function Moments Euclidean matrix elements of non-local operators connected to lightcone parton distributions See talks by David Richards, Yong Zhao, Michael Engelhardt, Anatoly Radyushkin, and Joseph Karpie Mellin moments of parton distributions are matrix elements of local operators This talk: simple matrix elements in complicated systems Gluon Transversity Quark Transversity O⌫1⌫2µ1µ2 = G⌫1µ1 G⌫2µ2 q¯σµ⌫ q Gluon Helicity Quark Helicity ˜ ˜ ↵ Oµ1µ2 = Gµ1↵Gµ2 q¯γµγ5q Gluon Momentum Quark Mass = G G ↵ qq¯ Oµ1µ2 µ1↵ µ2 !4 Nuclear Glue Gluon transversity operator involves change in helicity by two units In forward limit, only possible in spin 1 or higher targets Jaffe, Manohar, PLB 223 (1989) Detmold, Shanahan, PRD 94 (2016) Gluon transversity probes nuclear (“exotic”) gluon structure not present in a collection of isolated
    [Show full text]
  • Renormalizability of the Center-Vortex Free Sector of Yang-Mills Theory
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 101, 085007 (2020) Renormalizability of the center-vortex free sector of Yang-Mills theory † ‡ D. Fiorentini ,* D. R. Junior, L. E. Oxman , and R. F. Sobreiro § UFF—Universidade Federal Fluminense, Instituto de Física, Campus da Praia Vermelha, Avenida Litorânea s/n, 24210-346 Niterói, RJ, Brasil. (Received 11 February 2020; accepted 30 March 2020; published 17 April 2020) In this work, we analyze a recent proposal to detect SUðNÞ continuum Yang-Mills sectors labeled by center vortices, inspired by Laplacian-type center gauges in the lattice. Initially, after the introduction of appropriate external sources, we obtain a rich set of sector-dependent Ward identities, which can be used to control the form of the divergences. Next, we show the all-order multiplicative renormalizability of the center-vortex free sector. These are important steps towards the establishment of a first-principles, well-defined, and calculable Yang-Mills ensemble. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.085007 I. INTRODUCTION was obtained in Euclidean spacetime [12,13], which provides a calculational tool similar to the one used in As is well known, the Fadeev-Popov procedure to the perturbative regime. Beyond the linear covariant quantize Yang-Mills (YM) theories [1], so successful in gauges, many efforts were also devoted to the maximal making contact with experiments at high energies, cannot Abelian gauges; see Ref. [14] and references therein. BRST be extended to the infrared regime [2,3]. In covariant invariance is an important feature to have predictive power gauges, this was established by Singer’s theorem [4]: for (renormalizability), as well as to show the independence of any gauge fixing, there are orbits with more than one gauge observables on gauge-fixing parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase with No Mass Gap in Non-Perturbatively Gauge-Fixed
    Phase with no mass gap in non-perturbatively gauge-fixed Yang{Mills theory Maarten Goltermanay and Yigal Shamirb aInstitut de F´ısica d'Altes Energies, Universitat Aut`onomade Barcelona, E-08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain bSchool of Physics and Astronomy Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978 ISRAEL ABSTRACT An equivariantly gauge-fixed non-abelian gauge theory is a theory in which a coset of the gauge group, not containing the maximal abelian sub- group, is gauge fixed. Such theories are non-perturbatively well-defined. In a finite volume, the equivariant BRST symmetry guarantees that ex- pectation values of gauge-invariant operators are equal to their values in the unfixed theory. However, turning on a small breaking of this sym- metry, and turning it off after the thermodynamic limit has been taken, can in principle reveal new phases. In this paper we use a combination of strong-coupling and mean-field techniques to study an SU(2) Yang{Mills theory equivariantly gauge fixed to a U(1) subgroup. We find evidence for the existence of a new phase in which two of the gluons becomes mas- sive while the third one stays massless, resembling the broken phase of an SU(2) theory with an adjoint Higgs field. The difference is that here this phase occurs in an asymptotically-free theory. yPermanent address: Department of Physics and Astronomy, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA 1 1. Introduction Intro Some years ago, we proposed a new approach to discretizing non-abelian chiral gauge theories, in order to make them accessible to the methods of lattice gauge theory [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    EPJ Web of Conferences 245, 06009 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202024506009 CHEP 2019 Emergent Structure in QCD James Biddle1;∗, Waseem Kamleh1;∗∗, and Derek Leinweber1;∗∗∗ 1Centre for the Subatomic Structure of Matter, Department of Physics, The University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia Abstract. The structure of the SU(3) gauge-field vacuum is explored through visualisations of centre vortices and topological charge density. Stereoscopic visualisations highlight interesting features of the vortex vacuum, especially the frequency with which singular points appear and the important connection between branching points and topological charge. This work demonstrates how visualisations of the QCD ground-state fields can reveal new perspectives of centre-vortex structure. 1 Introduction Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) is the fundamental relativistic quantum field theory un- derpinning the strong interactions of nature. The gluons of QCD carry colour charge and self-couple. This self-coupling makes the empty vacuum unstable to the formation of non- trivial quark and gluon condensates. These non-trivial ground-state “QCD-vacuum” field configurations form the foundation of matter. There are eight chromo-electric and eight chromo-magnetic fields composing the QCD vacuum. An stereoscopic illustration of one of these chromo-magnetic fields is provided in Fig. 1. Animations of the fields are also available [1–3]. The essential, fundamentally-important, nonperturbative features of the QCD vacuum fields are the dynamical generation of mass through chiral symmetry breaking, and the con- finement of quarks. But what is the fundamental mechanism of QCD that underpins these phenomena? What aspect of the QCD vacuum causes quarks to be confined? Which aspect is responsible for dynamical mass generation? Do the underlying mechanisms share a common origin? One of the most promising candidates is the centre vortex perspective [4, 5].
    [Show full text]
  • Center Vortex Detection in Smooth Lattice Configurations
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 25 March 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202103.0615.v1 Article A POSSIBLE RESOLUTION TO TROUBLES OF SU(2) CENTER VORTEX DETECTION IN SMOOTH LATTICE CONFIGURATIONS Rudolf Golubich ∗ , Manfried Faber Atominstitut, Technische Universität Wien; 1040 Wien; Austria * [email protected] 1 Abstract: The center vortex model of quantum-chromodynamics can explain confinement and chiral 2 symmetry breaking. We present a possible resolution for problems of the vortex detection in 3 smooth configurations and discuss improvements for the detection of center vortices. 4 Keywords: quantum chromodynamics; confinement; center vortex model; vacuum structure; 5 cooling 6 PACS: 11.15.Ha, 12.38.Gc 7 1. Introduction 8 The center vortex model of Quantum Chromodynamics [1,2] explains confinement [3] 9 and chiral symmetry breaking [4–6] by the assumption that the relevant excitations 10 of the QCD vacuum are Center vortices: Closed color magnetic flux lines evolving in 11 time. In four dimensional space-time these closed flux lines form closed surfaces in 12 dual space, see Figure1. In the low temperature phase they percolate space-time in all dimensions. Within lattice simulations the center vortices are detected in maximal center Citation: Golubich, R.; Faber, M. Title. Universe 2021, 1, 0. https://doi.org/ Received: Accepted: Published: Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neu- tral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and insti- Figure 1. left) After transformation to maximal center gauge and projection to the center degrees of tutional affiliations. freedom, a flux line can be traced by following non-trivial plaquettes.
    [Show full text]
  • Baryonic Hybrids: Gluons As Beads on Strings Between Quarks
    UCLA UCLA Previously Published Works Title Baryonic hybrids: Gluons as beads on strings between quarks Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1r43x573 Journal Physical Review D, 71(5) ISSN 0556-2821 Author Cornwall, J M Publication Date 2005-03-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California PHYSICAL REVIEW D 71, 056002 (2005) Baryonic hybrids: Gluons as beads on strings between quarks John M. Cornwall* Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA (Received 20 December 2004; published 8 March 2005) In this paper we analyze the ground state of the heavy-quark qqqG system using standard principles of quark confinement and massive constituent gluons as established in the center-vortex picture. The known string tension KF and approximately-known gluon mass M lead to a precise specification of the long- range nonrelativistic part of the potential binding the gluon to the quarks with no undetermined phenomenological parameters, in the limit of large interquark separation R. Our major tool (also used earlier by Simonov) is the use of proper-time methods to describe gluon propagation within the quark system, along with some elementary group theory describing the gluon Wilson-line as a composite of colocated q and q lines. We show that (aside from color-Coulomb and similar terms) the gluon potential energy in the presence of quarks is accurately described (for small gluon fluctuations) via attaching these three strings to the gluon, which in equilibrium sits at the Steiner point of the Y-shaped string network joining the three quarks.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Non-Abelian Gauge Theory: Perturbative Quantization
    8 Non-Abelian Gauge Theory: Perturbative Quantization We’re now ready to consider the quantum theory of Yang–Mills. In the first few sec- tions, we’ll treat the path integral formally as an integral over infinite dimensional spaces, without worrying about imposing a regularization. We’ll turn to questions about using renormalization to make sense of these formal integrals in section 8.3. To specify Yang–Mills theory, we had to pick a principal G bundle P M together ! with a connection on P . So our first thought might be to try to define the Yang–Mills r partition function as ? SYM[ ]/~ Z [(M,g), g ] = A e− r (8.1) YM YM D ZA where 1 SYM[ ]= tr(F F ) (8.2) r −2g2 r ^⇤ r YM ZM as before, and is the space of all connections on P . A To understand what this integral might mean, first note that, given any two connections and , the 1-parameter family r r0 ⌧ = ⌧ +(1 ⌧) 0 (8.3) r r − r is also a connection for all ⌧ [0, 1]. For example, you can check that the rhs has the 2 behaviour expected of a connection under any gauge transformation. Thus we can find a 1 path in between any two connections. Since 0 ⌦M (g), we conclude that is an A r r2 1 A infinite dimensional affine space whose tangent space at any point is ⌦M (g), the infinite dimensional space of all g–valued covectors on M. In fact, it’s easy to write down a flat (L2-)metric on using the metric on M: A 2 1 µ⌫ a a d ds = tr(δA δA)= g δAµ δA⌫ pg d x.
    [Show full text]
  • Lattice QCD for Hyperon Spectroscopy
    Lattice QCD for Hyperon Spectroscopy David Richards Jefferson Lab KLF Collaboration Meeting, 12th Feb 2020 Outline • Lattice QCD - the basics….. • Baryon spectroscopy – What’s been done…. – Why the hyperons? • What are the challenges…. • What are we doing to overcome them… Lattice QCD • Continuum Euclidean space time replaced by four-dimensional lattice, or grid, of “spacing” a • Gauge fields are represented at SU(3) matrices on the links of the lattice - work with the elements rather than algebra iaT aAa (n) Uµ(n)=e µ Wilson, 74 Quarks ψ, ψ are Grassmann Variables, associated with the sites of the lattice Gattringer and Lang, Lattice Methods for Work in a finite 4D space-time Quantum Chromodynamics, Springer volume – Volume V sufficiently big to DeGrand and DeTar, Quantum contain, e.g. proton Chromodynamics on the Lattice, WSPC – Spacing a sufficiently fine to resolve its structure Lattice QCD - Summary Lattice QCD is QCD formulated on a Euclidean 4D spacetime lattice. It is systematically improvable. For precision calculations:: – Extrapolation in lattice spacing (cut-off) a → 0: a ≤ 0.1 fm – Extrapolation in the Spatial Volume V →∞: mπ L ≥ 4 – Sufficiently large temporal size T: mπ T ≥ 10 – Quark masses at physical value mπ → 140 MeV: mπ ≥ 140 MeV – Isolate ground-state hadrons Ground-state masses Hadron form factors, structure functions, GPDs Nucleon and precision matrix elements Low-lying Spectrum ip x ip x C(t)= 0 Φ(~x, t)Φ†(0) 0 C(t)= 0 e · Φ(0)e− · n n Φ†(0) 0 h | | i h | | ih | | i <latexit sha1_base64="equo589S0nhIsB+xVFPhW0
    [Show full text]