DOCSLIB.ORG

30 June 2019 Pillar 3 Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
30 June 2019 Pillar 3 Report 30 June 2019 Pillar 3 report UBS Group and significant regulated subsidiaries and sub-groups Table of contents Contacts Switchboards Office of the Group Company For all general inquiries Secretary www.ubs.com/contact The Group Company Secretary receives inquiries regarding Introduction and basis for preparation Zurich +41-44-234 1111 compensation and related issues London +44- 207-567 8000 addressed to members of the Board New York +1-212-821 3000 of Directors. UBS Group AG Hong Kong +852-2971 8888 Singapore +65-6495 8000 UBS Group AG, Office of the 6 Section 1 Key metrics Group Company Secretary 8 Section 2 Risk-weighted assets Investor Relations P.O. Box, CH-8098 Zurich, UBS’s Investor Relations team Switzerland 12 Section 3 Credit risk supports institutional, professional 24 Section 4 Counterparty credit risk and retail investors from [email protected] 31 Section 5 Securitizations our offices in Zurich, New York and Krakow. +41-44-235 6652 36 Section 6 Market risk Shareholder Services 40 Section 7 Interest rate risk in the banking book UBS Group AG, Investor Relations P.O. Box, CH-8098 Zurich, UBS’s Shareholder Services team, 43 Section 8 Going and gone concern requirements Switzerland a unit of the Group Company and eligible capital Secretary Office, is responsible www.ubs.com/investors for the registration of UBS Group AG 50 Section 9 Total loss-absorbing capacity registered shares. 52 Section 10 Leverage ratio Zurich +41-44-234 4100 New York +1-212-882 5734 UBS Group AG, Shareholder Services 55 Section 11 Liquidity coverage ratio P.O. Box, CH-8098 Zurich, 57 Section 12 Requirements for global systemically Switzerland Media Relations important banks and related indicators UBS’s Media Relations team supports [email protected] global media and journalists from our offices in Zurich, London, +41-44-235 6652 New York and Hong Kong. US Transfer Agent Significant regulated subsidiaries and sub-groups www.ubs.com/media For global registered share-related inquiries in the US. 60 Section 1 Introduction Zurich +41-44-234 8500 60 Section 2 UBS AG standalone [email protected] Computershare Trust Company NA P.O. Box 505000 64 Section 3 UBS Switzerland AG standalone London +44-20-7567 4714 Louisville, KY 40233-5000, USA 70 Section 4 UBS Europe SE consolidated [email protected] Shareholder online inquiries: 71 Section 5 UBS Americas Holding LLC consolidated New York +1-212-882 5858 https://www-us.computershare.com/ [email protected] investor/Contact Hong Kong +852-2971 8200 Shareholder website: [email protected] www.computershare.com/investor Calls from the US +1-866-305-9566 Calls from outside the US +1-781-575-2623 TDD for hearing impaired +1-800-231-5469 TDD for foreign shareholders +1-201-680-6610 Imprint Publisher: UBS Group AG, Zurich, Switzerland | www.ubs.com Language: English © UBS 2019. The key symbol and UBS are among the registered and unregistered trademarks of UBS. All rights reserved. Introduction and basis for preparation Introduction and basis for preparation Introduction and basis for preparation Scope and location of Basel III Pillar 3 disclosures Significant BCBS and FINMA capital adequacy, liquidity and funding, and related disclosure requirements The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) Basel III capital adequacy framework consists of three complementary This Pillar 3 report has been prepared in accordance with FINMA pillars. Pillar 1 provides a framework for measuring minimum Pillar 3 disclosure requirements (FINMA Circular 2016/1, capital requirements for the credit, market, operational and non- “Disclosure – banks”) issued on 16 July 2018, the underlying counterparty-related risks faced by banks. Pillar 2 addresses the BCBS guidance “Revised Pillar 3 disclosure requirements” issued principles of the supervisory review process, emphasizing the in January 2015, the “Frequently asked questions on the revised need for a qualitative approach to supervising banks. Pillar 3 Pillar 3 disclosure requirements” issued in August 2016, the requires banks to publish a range of disclosures, mainly covering “Pillar 3 disclosure requirements – consolidated and enhanced risk, capital, leverage, liquidity and remuneration. framework” issued in March 2017 and the subsequent This report provides Pillar 3 disclosures for UBS Group AG and “Technical Amendment – Pillar 3 disclosure requirements – prudential key figures and regulatory information for UBS AG regulatory treatment of accounting provisions” issued in August standalone, UBS Switzerland AG standalone, UBS Europe SE 2018. consolidated and UBS Americas Holding LLC consolidated in the respective sections under “Significant regulated subsidiaries and Changes to Pillar 3 disclosure requirements sub-groups.” In line with BCBS and FINMA requirements, the following As UBS is considered a systemically relevant bank (SRB) under disclosures are published for the first time, effective as of Swiss banking law, UBS Group AG and UBS AG are required to 30 June 2019: comply with regulations based on the Basel III framework as – “TLAC1 – TLAC composition for G-SIBs (at resolution group applicable to Swiss SRBs on a consolidated basis. Capital and level)” applicable to UBS Group AG consolidated; other regulatory information as of 30 June 2019 for UBS Group – “TLAC3 – Resolution entity – creditor ranking at legal entity AG consolidated is provided in the “Capital management” level” applicable to UBS Group AG at a legal entity level; section of our second quarter 2019 report and for UBS AG – “IRRBBA – IRRBB risk management objective and policies – consolidated in the “Capital management” section of the UBS qualitative requirements” applicable to UBS Group AG AG second quarter 2019 report, which are available under consolidated; “Quarterly reporting” at www.ubs.com/investors. – “IRRBB1 – Quantitative information on IRRBB” applicable to Local regulators may also require the publication of Pillar 3 UBS Group AG consolidated; and information at a subsidiary or sub-group level. Where applicable, – “IRRBBA1 – Quantitative disclosures relating to the position these local disclosures are provided under “Holding company structure and interest rate reset of IRRBB risk” applicable to and significant regulated subsidiaries and sub-groups” at UBS Group AG consolidated. www.ubs.com/investors. We currently expect to provide the "TLAC2 – Material subgroup entity – creditor ranking at legal entity level” disclosure in our 31 December 2019 Pillar 3 report. The “CR1 – Credit quality of assets” table in this report has been revised to address additional disclosure requirements with regard to the allocation of the accounting provisions for credit losses between the standardized approach and the internal ratings-based approach, as required by the aforementioned BCBS Technical Amendment issued in August 2018. 2 Significant BCBS requirements to be adopted in the In line with the FINMA-specified disclosure frequency and second half of 2019 or later requirements for disclosure with regard to comparative periods, we provide quantitative comparative information as of 31 March BCBS initial margin offset in the leverage ratio and new 2019 for disclosures required on a quarterly basis, and as of disclosure requirements 31 December 2018 for disclosures required on a semiannual The BCBS agreed to align the leverage ratio measurement of basis. Where specifically required by FINMA and/or BCBS, we client-cleared derivatives with the standardized approach to disclose comparative information for additional reporting dates. measuring counterparty credit risk exposures (SA-CCR). We The new TLAC1, TLAC3 and IRRBB disclosures are provided for expect these provisions will become effective as of 1 January the first time as of 30 June 2019 in this report without 2022. This treatment permits both cash and non-cash forms of comparative information. The IRRBB disclosure will be provided segregated initial margin, as well as cash and non-cash variation on an annual basis from 31 December 2019 onward. margin, received from a client to offset the replacement cost Where required, movement commentary is aligned with the and potential future exposure for client-cleared derivatives only. corresponding disclosure frequency required by FINMA and This will help to mitigate any potential effect on the leverage always refers to the latest comparative period. Throughout this ratio denominator from the finalization of the Basel III capital report, signposts are displayed at the beginning of a section, framework, which takes effect from 1 January 2022. table or chart – Annual | Semiannual | Quarterly | – indicating whether The BCBS also introduced a new disclosure standard, effective the disclosure is provided annually, semiannually or quarterly. A as of 1 January 2022, which sets out additional requirements for triangle symbol – – indicates the end of the signpost. banks to disclose their leverage ratios based on quarter-end and Refer to our 31 March 2019 Pillar 3 report, which is available daily average values of securities financing transactions. under “Pillar 3 disclosures” at www.ubs.com/investors, for more information about previously published quarterly Frequency and comparability of Pillar 3 disclosures movement commentary FINMA has specified the reporting frequency for each disclosure, as outlined in the table on pages 5 and 6 of our 31 December 2018 Pillar 3 report, which is available under “Pillar 3 disclosures” at www.ubs.com/investors. 3 UBS Group AG UBS Group AG Section
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Basel III: Post-Crisis Reforms
    Basel III: Post-Crisis Reforms Implementation Timeline Focus: Capital Definitions, Capital Focus: Capital Requirements Buffers and Liquidity Requirements Basel lll 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 1 January 2022 Full implementation of: 1. Revised standardised approach for credit risk; 2. Revised IRB framework; 1 January 3. Revised CVA framework; 1 January 1 January 1 January 1 January 1 January 2018 4. Revised operational risk framework; 2027 5. Revised market risk framework (Fundamental Review of 2023 2024 2025 2026 Full implementation of Leverage Trading Book); and Output 6. Leverage Ratio (revised exposure definition). Output Output Output Output Ratio (Existing exposure floor: Transitional implementation floor: 55% floor: 60% floor: 65% floor: 70% definition) Output floor: 50% 72.5% Capital Ratios 0% - 2.5% 0% - 2.5% Countercyclical 0% - 2.5% 2.5% Buffer 2.5% Conservation 2.5% Buffer 8% 6% Minimum Capital 4.5% Requirement Core Equity Tier 1 (CET 1) Tier 1 (T1) Total Capital (Tier 1 + Tier 2) Standardised Approach for Credit Risk New Categories of Revisions to the Existing Standardised Approach Exposures • Exposures to Banks • Exposure to Covered Bonds Bank exposures will be risk-weighted based on either the External Credit Risk Assessment Approach (ECRA) or Standardised Credit Risk Rated covered bonds will be risk Assessment Approach (SCRA). Banks are to apply ECRA where regulators do allow the use of external ratings for regulatory purposes and weighted based on issue SCRA for regulators that don’t. specific rating while risk weights for unrated covered bonds will • Exposures to Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) be inferred from the issuer’s For exposures that do not fulfil the eligibility criteria, risk weights are to be determined by either SCRA or ECRA.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Basel I, Basel II, and Basel III on Letters of Credit and Trade Finance
    Impact of Basel I, Basel II, and Basel III on Letters of Credit and Trade Finance Requirement Basel I Basel II Basel III 2013 2015 2019 Common Equity 2.0% of 3.5% of RWA 4.5% of RWA 4.5% of RWA RWA Tier 1 Capital 4.0% of 4.0% of 4.5% of RWA 6.0% of RWA 6.0% of RWA RWA RWA Total Capital 8.0% of 8.0% of 8.0% of RWA 8.0% of RWA 8.0% of RWA RWA RWA Capital Conversion -0- -0- +2.5% of RWA Buffer Leverage Ratio Observation Observation (4% of direct assets) (based on Total Capital) 3% of total direct and contingent assets Counter Cyclical Buffer +Up to 2.5% of RWA Liquidity Coverage Observation 30 days 30 days Net Stable Funding Observation Observation 1 year Additional Loss +1% to 2.5% of RWA Absorbency Color Code Key (US Applicability): (Applies only in the US) In the US, applies only to “Large, Internationally-Active Banks” Not yet implemented in the US Depending on the bank and the point in the economic cycle, under Basel III, the total capital requirement for a bank in 2019 may be as much as 15.5% of Risk-Weighted Assets (“RWA”), compared with 8% under Basel I and Basel II. The amount of Risk-Weighted Assets (“RWA”) is computed by multiplying the amount of each asset and contingent asset by a risk weighting and a Credit Conversion Factor (“CCF”) Under Basel I, risk weightings are set: 0% for sovereign obligors, 20% for banks where tenors ≤ one year, 50% for municipalities and residential mortgages, 100% for all corporate obligors Under Basel II, risk weightings are based on internal or external (rating agency) risk ratings with no special distinction for banks; capital requirements for exposures to banks are increased by as much as 650% (from 20% to as much as 150%) The Credit Conversion Factor for Letters of Credit varies under Basel I vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Basel III: a Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking Systems
    This standard has been integrated into the consolidated Basel Framework: https://www.bis.org/basel_framework/ Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems December 2010 (rev June 2011) Copies of publications are available from: Bank for International Settlements Communications CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +41 61 280 9100 and +41 61 280 8100 © Bank for International Settlements 2010. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is stated. ISBN print: 92-9131-859-0 ISBN web: 92-9197-859-0 Contents Contents ...................................................................................................................................3 Introduction...............................................................................................................................1 A. Strengthening the global capital framework ....................................................................2 1. Raising the quality, consistency and transparency of the capital base ..................2 2. Enhancing risk coverage........................................................................................3 3. Supplementing the risk-based capital requirement with a leverage ratio...............4 4. Reducing procyclicality and promoting countercyclical buffers ..............................5 Cyclicality of the minimum requirement .................................................................5 Forward
    [Show full text]
  • Basel Ii/Iii Implementation Roadmap for the Eastern Caribbean Currency Union
    BASEL II/III IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP FOR THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN CURRENCY UNION Bank Supervision Department EASTERN CARIBBEAN CENTRAL BANK ST KITTS BASEL II/III IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP FOR THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN CURRENCY UNION 1.0 PURPOSE This Roadmap provides an overview of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank’s (ECCB/the Central Bank) Basel II/III implementation programme for the Eastern Caribbean Currency Union (ECCU). The document outlines the Central Bank’s approach towards implementation, the implementation options selected and key deliverables/activities. The Roadmap is intended to guide the expectations and actions of all stakeholders associated with the Basel II/III implementation process. 2.0 INTRODUCTION The ECCB is committed to implementing certain aspects of Basel II/III in the ECCU for computing the capital adequacy of institutions licenced under the Banking Act 2015 (the Act), in accordance with Sections 46 and 47 of the Act1. Towards this end, the ECCB established a dedicated team (Basel Implementation Group) for spearheading the implementation effort and a Basel II/III Working Committee comprising of representatives from the ECCB, ECCU Bankers Association and commercial banks, for collaborating with the banking industry on an ongoing basis. The Central Bank sought comments on some draft standards2 in 2018 and plans to continue to deepen its interaction with licensees via a number of consultations and training sessions. Basel II/III constitutes a more comprehensive measure of capital adequacy than the existing Basel I. Basel II/III seeks to align regulatory capital requirements more closely with the underlying risks that banks face. The framework requires banks to assess the riskiness of their assets with respect to credit, market and operational risks and seeks to ensure that banks’ minimum capital requirements better reflect inherent risks in their portfolios, risk management practices and accompanying disclosures to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Powerful XVA Analytics. It's in Our DNA
    Powerful XVA Analytics. It’s in Our DNA. Comprehensive XVA Management Built on the Best Analytics Numerix Oneview puts the industry’s most sophisticated analytics at the core of your XVA desk. This analytic DNA empowers central desks to confidently manage counterparty exposures, integrate XVAs into deal prices, and execute even the most complex deals at the right price. ONE BEST PRICE ACTIVE MANAGEMENT Fast and accurate pricing, Proactively manage desk XVA analysis, exposure analysis, positions, analyze XVA Greeks and cheapest to trade, and regulatory possible hedges, understand P&Ls, capital analysis on any OTC derivative ONEVIEW FOR review CSAs for pricing and risk impacts, trade, from vanilla to exotic CENTRAL XVA and manage collateral/margin. MANAGEMENT OF OTC DERIVATIVES PORTFOLIOS RISK MANAGEMENT CAPITAL OPTIMIZATION Accurately measure, manage Minimize capital charges and mitigate counterparty credit risk for Basel III and and market risk across your SA-CCR compliance OTC derivatives portfolios. Profitable Decisions Demand Powerful Insights. XVA desks need fast and accurate views into the profitability and risks of their derivative business. Oneview’s next-generation technology provides the edge they need to compete and win in their markets. Oneview’s intelligent front-to-risk capabilities are powered by the most comprehensive analytic library in OTC derivatives and structured products, which includes our gold-standard hybrid model and our robust Monte Carlo engine. Designed for the evolution of the capital markets, Oneview was built for complex calculations, is scalable and cloud-ready—empowering unparalleled accuracy, enabling real-time calculations and unleashing dynamic custom reporting and analysis capabilities. All the insights you need, readily available at your fingertips.
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Series Exchange Rate, Equity
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES EXCHANGE RATE, EQUITY PRICES AND CAPITAL FLOWS Harald Hau Hélène Rey Working Paper 9398 http://www.nber.org/papers/w9398 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 December 2002 Deniz Igan provided outstanding research assistance. We thank Bernard Dumas, Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, Olivier Jeanne, Arvind Krishnamurthy, Carol Osler and Michael Woodford for very useful dicussions and Richard Lyons, Michael Moore and Richard Portes for detailed comments on earlier drafts. Thanks also to participants in the 2002 NBER IFM summer institute and in seminars at Columbia, Georgetown, George Washington University and the IMF. We are both very grateful to the IMF Research Department for its warm hospitality and its stimulating environment while writing parts of this paper. Sergio Schmukler and Stijn Claessens provided the stock market capitalization data. This paper is part of a research network on ‘The Analysis of International Capital Markets: Understanding Europe’s Role in the Global Economy’, funded by the European Commission under the Research Training Network Program (Contract No. HPRN(ECT(E 1999(E00067). The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. © 2002 by Harald Hau and Hélène Rey. All rights reserved. Short sections of text not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit including, © notice, is given to the source. Exchange Rate, Equity Prices and Capital Flows Harald Hau and Hélène Rey NBER Working Paper No. 9398 December 2002 JEL No. F3, F31, G1, G15 ABSTRACT We develop an equilibrium model in which exchange rates, stock prices and capital flows are jointly determined under incomplete forex risk trading.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Management Through Derivatives Securitization
    Illinois Wesleyan University Digital Commons @ IWU Honors Projects Business Administration 2007 Risk Management through Derivatives Securitization Stefan Filip '07 Illinois Wesleyan University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/busadmin_honproj Part of the Business Commons Recommended Citation Filip '07, Stefan, "Risk Management through Derivatives Securitization" (2007). Honors Projects. 11. https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/busadmin_honproj/11 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by faculty at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. Risk Management through Derivatives Securitization Stefan Filip Research Honors 2007 Dr. Jin Park Abstract: With the fluctuations in the financial markets reaching tens ofbillions of dollars in just one day, using complex financial instruments instead oftypical insurance could be more effective and cheaper to finance high-severity and low frequency risk exposures. Insurance-linked derivatives such as catastrophes bonds and weather bonds have been used for some time in the United States and European Union. The risks that they cover vary from property catastrophes, weather, general liability, and extreme mortality risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank Capital, Securitization and Credit Risk: an Empirical Evidence
    ARTICLES ACADÉMIQUES ACADEMIC ARTICLES Assurances et gestion des risques, vol. 75(4), janvier 2008, 459-485 Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 75(4), January 2008, 459-485 Bank Capital, Securitization and Credit Risk: an Empirical Evidence by Georges Dionne and Tarek M. Harchaoui ABSTRACT This paper is one of the first attempts to conduct an empirical investigation of the relationship between bank capital, securitization and bank risk-taking in a con- text of the rapid growth in off-balance-sheet activities. The data come from the Canadian financial sector. Evidence from the 1988-1998 period indicates that: (a) securitization has a negative statistical link with both current Tier 1 and Total risk- based capital ratios, and (b) there exists a positive statistical link between securi- tization and bank risk-taking. Profit-risk measure is more sensitive than loss-risk measure to the variation in securitization activity. These results seem to agree, during the studied period, with models indicating that banks might be induced to shift to more risky assets under the current capital requirements for credit risk because the regulatory capital levels are considered too high. Keywords: Securitization, credit risk, capital regulation, Canadian financial sector, bank regulation. JEL classification: G18, G21, G28. The authors: Georges Dionne (corresponding author), Canada Research Chair in Risk Management, HEC Montréal, Montreal, Canada, H3T 2A7, CIRRELT, and CREF. Telephone: 514 340-6596. Fax: 514 340-5019. E-mail address: [email protected] Tarek M. Harchaoui, Statistics Canada, Microeconomic analysis Division, R.H. Coats 18-F, Ottawa, Canada, K1A 0T6. E-mail address: [email protected] Research assistance from Rachid Aqdim and Philippe Bergevin is acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of Basel III
    The Political Economy of Basel III ********************Draft working paper: 20150930******************** Elias Bengtsson European Central Bank [email protected] Article classification: Research paper Abstract In response to the global financial crisis, the Basel Committee of Banking Supervision (BCBS) set out to develop a new global standard for banking regulation – the Basel III accord. This paper analyses consultation responses to assess the influence of external stakeholders on the Basel III process and outcome. Unlike most other research on global financial policy developments, it relies on a quantitative approach. The findings show that the interests and preferences of various stakeholder groups vary significantly, and the BCBS mainly accommodated the preferences of stakeholders from the financial industry and advanced economies in finalising Basel III. This largely corresponds to findings on the development of previous Basel accords. However, this paper also reveals that efforts to influence are also much higher among private sector stakeholders in advanced countries compared to other stakeholders. It thereby offers new light and raises questions on whether the distribution of abilities to influence global financial policy is skewed towards particular types of stakeholders. JEL Classification: F53; F59; P11; P16; G28 Key words: Political economy; Global financial standards, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision; Basel III; Banking regulation. Author bio: Elias Bengtsson is a Principal Economist at the European Central Bank. While writing the current article, he worked as an Advisor at the Financial Stability Department of Sveriges Riksbank (the central bank of Sweden). His research interests are financial stability, banking regulation and asset management. He is an Associate professor in Finance at Stockholm University and has held visiting positions at the London School of Economics and Stanford University.
    [Show full text]
  • Basel III: the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR)
    This standard has been integrated into the consolidated Basel Framework: https://www.bis.org/basel_framework/ Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Basel III: the net stable funding ratio October 2014 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). © Bank for International Settlements 2014. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is stated. ISBN 978-92-9131-964-0 (print) ISBN 978-92-9131-960-2 (online) Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 II. Definition and minimum requirements ........................................................................................................................... 2 A. Definition of available stable funding ..................................................................................................................... 3 B. Definition of required stable funding for assets and off-balance sheet exposures ............................. 6 III. Application issues for the NSFR ....................................................................................................................................... 13 A. Frequency of calculation and reporting ............................................................................................................... 13 B. Scope of application ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Basel III: the Liquidity Coverage Ratio and Liquidity Risk Monitoring Tools
    This standard has been integrated into the consolidated Basel Framework: https://www.bis.org/basel_framework/ Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Basel III: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and liquidity risk monitoring tools January 2013 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). © Bank for International Settlements 2013. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is cited. ISBN 92-9131- 912-0 (print) ISBN 92-9197- 912-0 (online) Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 Part 1: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio ..................................................................................... 4 I. Objective of the LCR and use of HQLA ......................................................................... 4 II. Definition of the LCR ..................................................................................................... 6 A. Stock of HQLA ..................................................................................................... 7 1. Characteristics of HQLA ............................................................................. 7 2. Operational requirements ........................................................................... 9 3. Diversification of the stock of HQLA.......................................................... 11 4. Definition of HQLA ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Estate Master DF
    Operations Manual 2 Estate Master DF Table of Contents Part I Introduction to Estate Master 6 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 6 2 Program Integrity................................................................................................................................... 6 3 System Requirements................................................................................................................................... 7 Part II Installation 9 Part III Introduction to Development Feasibility Analysis 11 1 Development................................................................................................................................... Margin 11 2 Time Value of................................................................................................................................... Money 11 3 Discounted ...................................................................................................................................Cash Flow Analysis 12 4 Performance................................................................................................................................... Indicators 12 5 Risk Assessment................................................................................................................................... 13 6 Discount Rate..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]