DOCSLIB.ORG

View Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View Annual Report 10-K 1 form10-k.htm UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 Form 10–K (Mark One) [X]ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2017 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. For the transition period from to Commission File Number 001-32698 MGT CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 13–4148725 (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer of incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 512 S. Mangum Street, Suite 408 Durham, NC 27701 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (914) 630–7430 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered under section 12(b) of the Act: common stock, par value $0.001 per share Securities registered under section 12(g) of the Act: Not applicable Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes[ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X] Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act: Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [X] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Emerging growth company [ ] If an emerging growth company, indicate by checkmark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X] As of June 30, 2017, the last day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter; the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non–affiliates of the registrant was approximately $47,597,959. As of March 30, 2018, the registrant had outstanding 66,073,075 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value. (the “Common Stock”) MGT CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES INDEX (in thousands, except share and per–share amounts) PART I 3 Item 1. Business 3 Item 1A. Risk Factors 13 Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 21 Item 2. Properties 22 Item 3. Legal Proceedings 22 Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 23 PART II 24 Item 5. Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters And Issuer’s Purchases Of Equity 24 Securities Item 6. Selected Financial Data 24 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 25 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk 28 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 28 Item 9. Changes in And Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 28 Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 28 Item 9B. Other Information 29 PART III 30 Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 30 Item 11. Executive Compensation 32 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management And Related Stockholder Matters 34 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 35 Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 36 PART IV 37 Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 37 Item 16. Form 10–K Summary. 37 SIGNATURES 38 NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS This Annual Report on Form 10-K and other written and oral statements made from time to time by us may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “expects,” “plans,” “will,” “forecasts,” “projects,” “intends,” “estimates,” and other words of similar meaning. One can identify them by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements are likely to address our growth strategy, financial results and product and development programs. One must carefully consider any such statement and should understand that many factors could cause actual results to differ from our forward looking statements. These factors may include inaccurate assumptions and a broad variety of other risks and uncertainties, including some that are known and some that are not. No forward-looking statement can be guaranteed and actual future results may vary materially. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled “Risk Factors” and the risks set out below, any of which may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks include, by way of example and not in limitation: ● The uncertainty of profitability based upon our history of losses; ● Risks related to failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis and on acceptable terms to continue as going concern; and ● Other risks and uncertainties related to our business plan and business strategy. This list is not an exhaustive list of the factors that may affect any of our forward-looking statements. These and other factors should be considered carefully and readers should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements are made based on management’s beliefs, estimates and opinions on the date the statements are made and we undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements if these beliefs, estimates and opinions or other circumstances should change. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results. Information regarding market and industry statistics contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is included based on information available to us that we believe is accurate. It is generally based on industry and other publications that are not produced for purposes of securities offerings or economic analysis. We have not reviewed or included data from all sources. Forecasts and other forward-looking information obtained from these sources are subject to the same qualifications and the additional uncertainties accompanying any estimates of future market size, revenue and market acceptance of products and services. As a result, investors should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. As used in this annual report, the terms “we”, “us”, “our”, “MGT” and the “Company” mean MGT Capital Investments, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated. All figures set forth in this Annual Report as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 on this Form 10–K are in thousands, except share and per–share amounts. PART I Item 1. Business MGT Capital Investments, Inc. is a Delaware corporation, incorporated in 2000. The predecessor of the Company was originally incorporated in Utah in 1977. MGT is comprised of the parent company, wholly–owned subsidiaries MGT Cybersecurity, Inc., Medicsight, Inc., MGT Sports, Inc. (“MGT Sports”), MGT Studios, Inc. (“MGT Studios”), MGT Interactive, LLC, MGT Gaming, Inc., MGT Mining One, Inc. and MGT Mining Two, Inc. MGT Studios also owns a controlling minority interest in the subsidiary M2P Americas, Inc. Our corporate office is located in Durham, North Carolina. 3 Cryptocurrency Mining Business Industry Summary Bitcoin is a world–recognized cryptocurrency, which can be traded and converted into major fiat currencies on cryptocurrency exchanges. Cryptocurrencies are a medium of exchange that are transacted through and recorded on a decentralized distributed ledger system, called the “Blockchain.” The Blockchain is built by a chronological addition of transactions, which are grouped into blocks. Each new block requires a mathematical problem to be solved before it can be confirmed and added to the Blockchain. The speed at which these mathematical problems are solved is called Hash Rate. It represents the overall computing power of the network and is measured in Hashes per second (“H/s”). The complexity of these problems, also referred to as mining difficulty, increases with the network’s growing Hash rate.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pwc I 2Nd Global Crypto M&A and Fundraising Report
    2nd Global Crypto M&A and Fundraising Report April 2020 2 PwC I 2nd Global Crypto M&A and Fundraising Report Dear Clients and Friends, We are proud to launch the 2nd edition of our Global Crypto M&A and Fundraising Report. We hope that the market colour and insights from this report will be useful data points. We will continue to publish this report twice a year to enable you to monitor the ongoing trends in the crypto ecosystem. PwC has put together a “one stop shop” offering, focused on crypto services across our various lines of services in over 25 jurisdictions, including the most active crypto jurisdictions. Our goal is to service your needs in the best possible way leveraging the PwC network and allowing you to make your project a success. Our crypto clients include crypto exchanges, crypto investors, crypto asset managers, ICOs/IEOs/STOs/stable and asset backed tokens, traditional financial institutions entering the crypto space as well as governments, central banks, regulators and other policy makers looking at the crypto ecosystem. As part of our “one stop shop” offering, we provide an entire range of services to the crypto ecosystem including strategy, legal, regulatory, accounting, tax, governance, risk assurance, audit, cybersecurity, M&A advisory as well as capital raising. More details are available on our global crypto page as well as at the back of this report. 2nd Global Crypto M&A and Fundraising Report April 2020 PwC 2 3 PwC I 2nd Global Crypto M&A and Fundraising Report 5 Key takeaways when comparing 2018 vs 2019 There
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Limits of Bitcoin and the Blockchain∗†
    The Economic Limits of Bitcoin and the Blockchain∗† Eric Budish‡ June 5, 2018 Abstract The amount of computational power devoted to anonymous, decentralized blockchains such as Bitcoin’s must simultaneously satisfy two conditions in equilibrium: (1) a zero-profit condition among miners, who engage in a rent-seeking competition for the prize associated with adding the next block to the chain; and (2) an incentive compatibility condition on the system’s vulnerability to a “majority attack”, namely that the computational costs of such an attack must exceed the benefits. Together, these two equations imply that (3) the recurring, “flow”, payments to miners for running the blockchain must be large relative to the one-off, “stock”, benefits of attacking it. This is very expensive! The constraint is softer (i.e., stock versus stock) if both (i) the mining technology used to run the blockchain is both scarce and non-repurposable, and (ii) any majority attack is a “sabotage” in that it causes a collapse in the economic value of the blockchain; however, reliance on non-repurposable technology for security and vulnerability to sabotage each raise their own concerns, and point to specific collapse scenarios. In particular, the model suggests that Bitcoin would be majority attacked if it became sufficiently economically important — e.g., if it became a “store of value” akin to gold — which suggests that there are intrinsic economic limits to how economically important it can become in the first place. ∗Project start date: Feb 18, 2018. First public draft: May 3, 2018. For the record, the first large-stakes majority attack of a well-known cryptocurrency, the $18M attack on Bitcoin Gold, occurred a few weeks later in mid-May 2018 (Wilmoth, 2018; Wong, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey on Volatility Fluctuations in the Decentralized Cryptocurrency Financial Assets
    Journal of Risk and Financial Management Review A Survey on Volatility Fluctuations in the Decentralized Cryptocurrency Financial Assets Nikolaos A. Kyriazis Department of Economics, University of Thessaly, 38333 Volos, Greece; [email protected] Abstract: This study is an integrated survey of GARCH methodologies applications on 67 empirical papers that focus on cryptocurrencies. More sophisticated GARCH models are found to better explain the fluctuations in the volatility of cryptocurrencies. The main characteristics and the optimal approaches for modeling returns and volatility of cryptocurrencies are under scrutiny. Moreover, emphasis is placed on interconnectedness and hedging and/or diversifying abilities, measurement of profit-making and risk, efficiency and herding behavior. This leads to fruitful results and sheds light on a broad spectrum of aspects. In-depth analysis is provided of the speculative character of digital currencies and the possibility of improvement of the risk–return trade-off in investors’ portfolios. Overall, it is found that the inclusion of Bitcoin in portfolios with conventional assets could significantly improve the risk–return trade-off of investors’ decisions. Results on whether Bitcoin resembles gold are split. The same is true about whether Bitcoins volatility presents larger reactions to positive or negative shocks. Cryptocurrency markets are found not to be efficient. This study provides a roadmap for researchers and investors as well as authorities. Keywords: decentralized cryptocurrency; Bitcoin; survey; volatility modelling Citation: Kyriazis, Nikolaos A. 2021. A Survey on Volatility Fluctuations in the Decentralized Cryptocurrency Financial Assets. Journal of Risk and 1. Introduction Financial Management 14: 293. The continuing evolution of cryptocurrency markets and exchanges during the last few https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm years has aroused sparkling interest amid academic researchers, monetary policymakers, 14070293 regulators, investors and the financial press.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd Global Cryptoasset Benchmarking Study
    3RD GLOBAL CRYPTOASSET BENCHMARKING STUDY Apolline Blandin, Dr. Gina Pieters, Yue Wu, Thomas Eisermann, Anton Dek, Sean Taylor, Damaris Njoki September 2020 supported by Disclaimer: Data for this report has been gathered primarily from online surveys. While every reasonable effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the data collected, the research team cannot exclude potential errors and omissions. This report should not be considered to provide legal or investment advice. Opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the authors and not necessarily those of their respective institutions. TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORDS ..................................................................................................................................................4 RESEARCH TEAM ..........................................................................................................................................6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 11 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................ 14 SECTION 1: INDUSTRY GROWTH INDICATORS .........................................................................17 Employment figures ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Trading and Arbitrage in Cryptocurrency Markets
    Trading and Arbitrage in Cryptocurrency Markets Igor Makarov1 and Antoinette Schoar∗2 1London School of Economics 2MIT Sloan, NBER, CEPR December 15, 2018 ABSTRACT We study the efficiency, price formation and segmentation of cryptocurrency markets. We document large, recurrent arbitrage opportunities in cryptocurrency prices relative to fiat currencies across exchanges, which often persist for weeks. Price deviations are much larger across than within countries, and smaller between cryptocurrencies. Price deviations across countries co-move and open up in times of large appreciations of the Bitcoin. Countries that on average have a higher premium over the US Bitcoin price also see a bigger widening of arbitrage deviations in times of large appreciations of the Bitcoin. Finally, we decompose signed volume on each exchange into a common and an idiosyncratic component. We show that the common component explains up to 85% of Bitcoin returns and that the idiosyncratic components play an important role in explaining the size of the arbitrage spreads between exchanges. ∗Igor Makarov: Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK. Email: [email protected]. An- toinette Schoar: 62-638, 100 Main Street, Cambridge MA 02138, USA. Email: [email protected]. We thank Yupeng Wang and Yuting Wang for outstanding research assistance. We thank seminar participants at the Brevan Howard Center at Imperial College, EPFL Lausanne, European Sum- mer Symposium in Financial Markets 2018 Gerzensee, HSE Moscow, LSE, and Nova Lisbon, as well as Anastassia Fedyk, Adam Guren, Simon Gervais, Dong Lou, Peter Kondor, Gita Rao, Norman Sch¨urhoff,and Adrien Verdelhan for helpful comments. Andreas Caravella, Robert Edstr¨omand Am- bre Soubiran provided us with very useful information about the data.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 FINTECH100 Leading Global Fintech Innovators 2017 FINTECH100
    2018 FINTECH100 Leading Global Fintech Innovators 2017 FINTECH100 Leadin loba Fintec nnovators 1 1 2016 2017 Fintech100 Report FINTECH100 Leadin loba Fintec nnovators Company #00 1 | Fintech Innovators 2016 1 2015 Fintech100 Report FINTECH 100 Leading Global “ Fintech Innovators Report 2015 Company Description At a Glance Tag Line Located Year Founded Key People Website Specialisation Staff Enabler or Disruptor Key Investors Ownership Size User Engagement $ $ $ $ $ The 100 Leading Fintech Innovators Report 2016 Fintech100 Report The 50 Best Fintech Innovators Report 2014 Fintech100 Report 2 About the List The Fintech100 is a collaborative effort between H2 Ventures and KPMG. In its fifth year, the Fintech100 uncovers and evaluates the most innovative Fintech companies globally. The Fintech100 comprises a ‘Top 50’ and an ‘Emerging 50’ and highlights those companies globally that are taking advantage of technology and driving disruption within the financial services industry. A judging panel comprised of senior partners from H2 Ventures and KPMG has decided the final composition of the Fintech100 list. H2 Ventures H2 Ventures is a global thought leader in fintech venture capital investment. Founded by brothers Ben and Toby Heap, and based in Sydney, Australia, it invests alongside entrepreneurs and other investors in early stage fintech ventures. H2 Ventures is the manager of the H2 Accelerator – Australia’s only dedicated fintech accelerator – and operates out of Sydney’s dynamic Startup Hub. Twitter @H2_Ventures LinkedIn H2 Ventures Facebook H2 Ventures KPMG Global Fintech The financial services industry is transforming with the emergence of innovative, new products, channels and business models. This wave of disruption is primarily driven by evolving customer expectations, digitalisation, as well as continued regulatory and cost pressures.
    [Show full text]
  • Bitcoin Mining
    Bitcoin Mining The Evolution of A Multibillion Dollar Industry Published: 9 March, 2020 Author: Yassine Elmandjra, Blockchain and Cryptoassets Analyst at ARK Invest Co-Author: Derek Hsue, Investments and Research Team Member at Blockchain Capital Join the conversation on Twitter @ARKinvest www.ark-invest.com Bitcoin Mining The Evolution of A Multibillion Dollar Industry Yassine Elmandjra, and Derek Hsue, CONTENTS I. Introduction 3 II. The Importance of Proof of Work 3 Is Proof-of-Work Inefficient? 4 The Cost to Reverse a Transaction 5 III. The Role of Hardware 7 The Evolution of Bitcoin Miner Hardware 7 The Rise of ASIC Commoditization 9 Manufacturing and Distribution 11 Sizing the Miner Hardware Opportunity 11 IV. The Operations of Mining 12 The Evolution of Mining as an Operation 12 Manufacturers and Self-Mining 13 The Cost to Mine 13 The Geography of Mining 14 The State of Mining Pools 15 V. Miner Influence 20 Do Miners Set the Price Floor? 20 Are Miners Whales? 21 Addressing Mining Attack Vectors 22 VI. The Future of Bitcoin Mining 24 2 Bitcoin Mining The Evolution of A Multibillion Dollar Industry Yassine Elmandjra, and Derek Hsue, I. Introduction Bitcoin’s innovation lies in its ability to coordinate trust and facilitate the transfer of value without relying on a centralized authority. The enabler is proof-of-work mining, a mechanism that adds new bitcoin to the money supply and protects the network against nefarious actors’ attempting to spend the same bitcoin more than once. Through economic incentives, miners voluntarily secure the network by verifying “blocks” of transactions and appending them to Bitcoin’s public ledger.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Status and Regulation of Bitcoin in Australia
    The University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Theses 2017 Future digital money: The legal status and regulation of bitcoin in Australia Chinelle van der Westhuizen Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses Part of the Law Commons COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 WARNING The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further copying or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Do not remove this notice. Publication Details van der Westhuizen, C. (2017). Future digital money: The legal status and regulation of bitcoin in Australia (Master of Laws (Thesis)). University of Notre Dame Australia. https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses/160 This dissertation/thesis is brought to you by ResearchOnline@ND. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@ND. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Notre Dame Australia School of Law FUTURE DIGITAL MONEY: THE LEGAL STATUS AND REGULATION OF BITCOIN IN AUSTRALIA Chinelle van der Westhuizen LLB, LLM (University of Pretoria) This thesis is submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Master of Laws by Research 2017 DECLARATION This thesis does not, to the best of my knowledge, contain previously published or written material by another person except where due reference is made in the text, or any material previously submitted for a degree in any higher degree institution. _________________________________ Chinelle van der Westhuizen _________________________________ Date i ACKNOWLDEGEMENTS First and foremost, I thank God for his abundant love and goodness throughout this research period and for Blessing me with the talents to endure such a challenging research project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macro-Economics of Crypto-Currencies: Balancing Entrepreneurialism and Monetary Policy
    ENTREPRENEURSHIP & POLICY WORKING PAPER SERIES The Macro-Economics of Crypto-Currencies: Balancing Entrepreneurialism and Monetary Policy Eli Noam In 2016, the Nasdaq Educational Foundation awarded the Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA) a multi-year grant to support initiatives at the intersection of digital entrepreneurship and public policy. Over the past three years, SIPA has undertaken new research, introduced new pedagogy, launched student venture competitions, and convened policy forums that have engaged scholars across Columbia University as well as entrepreneurs and leaders from both the public and private sectors. New research has covered three broad areas: Cities & Innovation; Digital Innovation & Entrepreneurial Solutions; and Emerging Global Digital Policy. Specific topics have included global education technology; cryptocurrencies and the new technologies of money; the urban innovation environment, with a focus on New York City; government measures to support the digital economy in Brazil, Shenzhen, China, and India; and entrepreneurship focused on addressing misinformation. With special thanks to the Nasdaq Educational Foundation for its support of SIPA’s Entrepreneurship and Policy Initiative. Table of Contents Abstract . 1 1. Introduction . 2. 2. A History of Governmental and Private Moneys . 2 A. United States . 3 . B. Other Examples of Private Moneys . .4 . 3. The Emergence of Electronic Moneys . 5 A. Electronic Moneys . 5 B. Distributed Ledger Technology . 6. C. Blockchain Technology . 6 D. Cryptocurrencies. 8 E. An Illustration of a Bitcoin Transaction . 9 4. Advantages and Drawbacks of Crypto-Currencies . 10 A. Advantages . 10 B. Problems . 11 C. The Potential for Improvements . 15 5. The Impact of Cryptocurrencies on Macro-Economic Policy .
    [Show full text]
  • Bitcoin Mining Bitcoin
    Bitcoin Mining Explained BITCOIN MINING BITCOIN MINING Bitcoin Mining Explained Copyright © 2018 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 4 WHAT IS BITCOIN MINING? 5 BITCOIN MINING TERMINOLOGY 6 WHY DO PEOPLE MINE BITCOIN? 9 GETTING STARTED MINING 12 TOP HARDWARE FOR BITCOIN MINING 13 WHAT SOFTWARE IS NEEDED? 16 MINING APPS 17 ELECTRICAL COSTS FOR MINING 22 OTHER BITCOIN MINING OPTIONS 23 CLOUD MINING 23 MINING POOLS 23 HOW TO SET UP A BITCOIN MINING OPERATION 25 HOW TO CALCULATE BITCOIN MINING PROFITS 26 RISKS AND REWARDS OF BITCOIN MINING 27 RISKS 27 REWARDS 27 CONCLUSION 29 3 Introduction It is no longer news that the adoption of digital currencies as a means of making payment is rapidly gaining momentum around the world. Bitcoin, which is the first example of the growing category of money known as the cryptocurrency, is the most popular and widely accepted of them all. Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer electronic cash system that was invented by a software developer called Satoshi Nakamoto, and it is currently taking the lead amongst other digital currencies. It is an electronic payment system based on mathematical proof that is created and held electronically. Bitcoin is also a decentralized form of cryptocurrency that is independent of any central authority – meaning, there is no single institution controlling the Bitcoin network. This eBook is going to help you go beyond a basic understanding of Bitcoin and the mining of it. When you are finished reading, you’ll be ready to get started mining Bitcoins today! 4 What is Bitcoin Mining? In traditional fiat currency systems, money is printed by the government and released into circulation whenever it is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carbon Footprint of Bitcoin Christian Stoll, Lena Klaaßen, and Ulrich Gallersdörfer
    Working Paper Series The Carbon Footprint of Bitcoin Christian Stoll, Lena Klaaßen, and Ulrich Gallersdörfer December 2018 CEEPR WP 2018-018 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY The Carbon Footprint of Bitcoin Christian Stoll,1,2,* Lena Klaaßen,3 Ulrich Gallersdörfer4 Abstract Blockchain began with Bitcoin, which was the first successful attempt to validate transactions via a decentralized data protocol. Participation in its validation process requires specialized hardware and vast amounts of electricity, which translate into a significant carbon footprint. Here we demonstrate a methodology for estimating the power consumption associated with Bitcoin’s blockchain based on IPO filings of major hardware manufacturers, insights on mining facility operations, and mining pool compositions. We then translate our power consumption estimate into carbon emissions, using the localization of IP addresses. We determine the annual electricity consumption of Bitcoin, as of November 2018, to be 48.2 TWh, and estimate that annual carbon emissions range from 21.5 to 53.6 MtCO2. The means that the level of emissions produced by Bitcoin sits between the levels produced by the nations of Bolivia and Portugal. With this article, we aim to gauge the external costs of Bitcoin, and inform the broader debate on the costs and benefits of cryptocurrencies. The externalities we discuss here may help policy-makers in setting the right rules as the adoption journey of blockchain has just started. 1 MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Massachusetts
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptocurrency & Blockchain
    Cryptocurrency & blockchain SPECIAL REPORT 2019 EVOLUTION FOCUS SECURITY Blockchain advances digitisation of Fund managers’ views on crypto/ Crypto custody solutions drive funds industry digital investing institutionalisation Featuring BVI Finance | Copper | Eversheds Sutherland | Harneys | RSK | Silver 8 Capital Imagine lawyers who eat crypto for breakfast. Blockchain, crypto currencies and digital assets are changing the financial landscape. Our clients trust Harneys to understand not only the law and regulation of blockchain, but the underlying technology too. We’re Harneys, a global offshore law firm with entrepreneurial thinking. harneys.com CONTENTS INSIDE THIS ISSUE… 04 BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY – A BEDROCK FOR DIGITISING THE GLOBAL FUNDS INDUSTRY By James Williams 12 BITCOIN, MONETARY INNOVATION AND THE BUSINESS CYCLE By Manuel Anguita, Silver 8 Capital 15 BUILDING A WALLED GARDEN Interview with Boris Bohrer-Bilowitzki, Copper 18 TURNING INFORMATION INTO CASH: PRACTICAL 04 ISSUES WHEN SETTING UP A CRYPTO-FUND By Ben Watford & James Burnie, Eversheds Sutherland 20 DIGITAL ASSET SPACE DEVELOPING AN INSTITUTIONAL IMAGE By James Williams 25 BVI TARGETS DIGITAL ASSET SPACE AS KEY GROWTH DRIVER Q&A with Simon Gray, BVI Finance 27 ROOTSTOCK’S RIF: THE FUTURE OF BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY Q&A with Diego Gutierrez Zaldivar, RSK 28 DIRECTORY 15 Published by: Global Fund Media Ltd, 8 St James’s Square, London SW1Y 4JU, UK 25 www.globalfundmedia.com ©Copyright 2019 Global Fund Media Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be repro- duced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]