DOCSLIB.ORG

BFDR-E) for Review and Comment Only

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BFDR-E) for Review and Comment Only Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise 5 IHE Quality, Research and Public Health Technical Framework Supplement Birth and Fetal Death Reporting-Enhanced 10 (BFDR-E) For review and comment only. DO NOT implement this public comment version. HL7® FHIR® R4 15 Using Resources at FMM Level 2-5 Revision 4.0 – Draft for Public Comment Date: July 23, 2021 20 Author: QRPH Technical Committee Email: [email protected] Please verify you have the most recent version of this document. See here for Trial 25 Implementation and Final Text versions and here for Public Comment versions. Copyright © 2021: IHE International, Inc. IHE Quality, Research and Public Health Technical Framework Supplement – Birth and Fetal Death Reporting-Enhanced (BFDR-E) ______________________________________________________________________________ Foreword This is a supplement to the IHE Quality, Research and Public Health (QRPH) Technical Framework. Each supplement undergoes a process of public comment and trial implementation 30 before being incorporated into the volumes of the Technical Frameworks. This supplement is published on July 23, 2021 for Public Comment. Comments are invited and can be submitted at https://www.ihe.net/QRPH_Public_Comments. In order to be considered in development of the Trial Implementation version of the supplement, comments must be received by August 22, 2021. 35 “Boxed” instructions like the sample below indicate to the Volume Editor how to integrate the relevant section(s) into the relevant Technical Framework volume. Amend Section X.X by the following: Where the amendment adds text, make the added text bold underline. Where the amendment removes text, make the removed text bold strikethrough. When entire new sections are added, 40 introduce with editor’s instructions to “add new text” or similar, which for readability are not bolded or underlined. General information about IHE can be found at www.ihe.net. Information about the IHE QRPH domain can be found at http://www.ihe.net/IHE_Domains. 45 Information about the organization of IHE Technical Frameworks and Supplements and the process used to create them can be found at http://www.ihe.net/IHE_Process and http://www.ihe.net/Profiles. The current version of the IHE QRPH Technical Framework can be found at http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Frameworks. 50 __________________________________________________________________________ Rev. 4.0 – 2021-07-23 2 Copyright © 2021: IHE International, Inc. Template Rev. 10.3 DO NOT IMPLEMENT PUBLIC COMMENT VERSIONS IHE Quality, Research and Public Health Technical Framework Supplement – Birth and Fetal Death Reporting-Enhanced (BFDR-E) ______________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS Introduction to this Supplement .................................................................................................... 12 55 Open Issues and Questions ...................................................................................................... 13 Closed Issues ............................................................................................................................ 14 IHE Technical Frameworks General Introduction ........................................................................ 17 9 Copyright Licenses................................................................................................................... 17 10 Trademark ................................................................................................................................ 17 60 IHE Technical Frameworks General Introduction Appendices .................................................... 18 Appendix A – Actors .................................................................................................................... 18 Appendix B – Transactions ........................................................................................................... 19 Appendix D – Glossary ................................................................................................................. 19 Volume 1 - Profiles ...................................................................................................................... 23 65 Domain-specific additions ....................................................................................................... 23 X Birth and Fetal Death Reporting-Enhanced (BFDR-E) Profile ................................................ 23 X.1 BFDR-E Actors, Transactions, and Content Modules ...................................................... 24 X.1.1 Actor Descriptions and Actor Profile Requirements ................................................. 27 X.1.1.1 Content Creator .................................................................................................. 27 70 X.1.1.2 Content Consumer ............................................................................................. 27 X.1.1.3 Form Filler ......................................................................................................... 28 X.1.1.4 Form Manager ................................................................................................... 28 X.1.1.5 Form Receiver ................................................................................................... 29 X.1.1.6 Form Processor .................................................................................................. 29 75 X.1.1.7 Form Receiver Document Exporter ................................................................... 29 X.1.1.8 Form Processor Document Exporter ................................................................. 29 X.1.1.9 Form Receiver Message Exporter ..................................................................... 30 X.1.1.10 Form Processor Message Exporter .................................................................. 30 X.1.1.11 Form Archiver ................................................................................................. 30 80 X.1.1.12 Data Consumer ................................................................................................ 30 X.1.1.13 Data Responder ................................................................................................ 30 X.2 BFDR-E Actor Options ..................................................................................................... 30 X.2.1 LDS Pre-Pop Option ................................................................................................. 31 X.2.2 LDS-VR Pre-Pop Option ........................................................................................... 32 85 X.2.3 Archive Form Option ................................................................................................ 32 X.2.4 Antepartum Import Option ........................................................................................ 32 X.2.5 Provider Supplied Live Birth Reporting Option ....................................................... 32 X.2.6 Provider Supplied Mother's Live Birth Information Option ..................................... 33 X.2.7 Provider Supplied Facility’s Live Birth Information Option .................................... 33 90 X.2.8 Provider Supplied Fetal Death Reporting Option ..................................................... 33 X.2.9 Fetal Death Facility's Information Option ................................................................. 33 X.2.10 Fetal Death Mother's Information Option ............................................................... 33 __________________________________________________________________________ Rev. 4.0 – 2021-07-23 3 Copyright © 2021: IHE International, Inc. Template Rev. 10.3 DO NOT IMPLEMENT PUBLIC COMMENT VERSIONS IHE Quality, Research and Public Health Technical Framework Supplement – Birth and Fetal Death Reporting-Enhanced (BFDR-E) ______________________________________________________________________________ X.2.11 Jurisdiction Live Birth Reporting Option ................................................................ 34 X.2.12 Jurisdiction Fetal Death Reporting Option .............................................................. 34 95 X.2.13 Void Certificate Reporting Option .......................................................................... 34 X.2.14 Coded Cause of Death Reporting Option ................................................................ 34 X.2.15 Coded Race/Ethnicity Reporting Option ................................................................. 34 X.3 BFDR-E Required Actor Groupings ................................................................................. 35 X.4 BFDR-E Overview ............................................................................................................ 35 100 X.4.1 Concepts .................................................................................................................... 36 X.4.2 Use Cases .................................................................................................................. 37 X.4.2.1 Use Case #1: Forms Data Capture with Messaging .......................................... 37 X.4.2.1.1 Use Case Description ................................................................................. 37 X.4.2.1.2 Processing Steps ........................................................................................ 37 105 X.4.2.1.2.1 Pre-conditions .................................................................................... 37 X.4.2.1.2.2 Main Flow .........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SNOMED CT Implementation: Implications of Choosing Clinical Findings Or Observable Entities
    SNOMED CT implementation: Implications of choosing Clinical findings or Observable entities a,1 a Anne Randorff Rasmussen , Kirstine Rosenbeck aDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Medical Informatics, Aalborg University, Denmark Abstract. Internationally, it is a priority to develop and implement semantically interoperable health information systems.[1] One required technology is the use of standardised clinical terminologies. The terminology, SNOMED CT, has shown superior coverage compared to other terminologies in multiple clinical fields. The aim of this paper is to analyse SNOMED CT implementation in an Electronic Health Record (EHR). More specifically, differences and consequences of applying clinical findings (CFs) as an alternative to observable entities (OEs) is analysed. Results show that CFs represents the content of the templates with better coverage, with more parent concepts and with a higher degree of fully defined terms than the OEs. We discuss the possibility to further evaluate the observable entity hierarchy to overcome a potential overlapping use of the two hierarchies. Keywords. Clinical terminology, Implementation, SNOMED CT, Observable entity, Clinical finding, Electronic Health Record 1. Introduction Multiple definitions of identical concepts are a challenge in data communication in health care. Use of standardised clinical terminologies has the potential to ensure unambiguous data definition. This is a prerequisite in achieving semantic interoperability between health information systems. There exists numerous clinical terminologies, but SNOMED CT has shown to be superior regarding coverage in multiple clinical fields.[2,3] Therefore, SNOMED CT is chosen as the point of departure in this study. SNOMED CT is maintained and refined by the International Health Terminology Standardisation Organisation (IHTSDO).
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial 2011.Pmd
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India January/February 2011 pg 22 - 24 Editorial Reviving the Art of Obstetrics Science of Obstetrics is more of an art, and this art is experience and skill with forceps have become difficult being increasingly forgotten today. Young to obtain. Residents are no longer taught this technique obstetricians are shying away for practicing this art in and senior obstetricians are doing it less & less. favour of Caesarean Section (CS). It has been reported Therefore, retraining the obstetric community in this that the CS rate has increased in United States to 32% 1, traditional method is an urgent task. Canada to 22.5% 2 & United Kingdom 23.8% 3. A study by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in The forceps should be considered as an alternative to 33 tertiary care institutions noted that the average CS when the situation, so called ‘Failure to Progress’ in caesarean section rate increased from 21.8% in 1993– the lower pelvic strait occurs. Forceps remains a valid 1994 to 25.4% in 1998-1999 including 42.4% option when problems arise during second stage of primigravidas resulting into a proportionate increase labour. The most common indications are fetal in repeat CS 4. The WHO recommends that a CS rate of compromise and failure to deliver spontaneously with more than 15% is not justified. Even though today CS maximum maternal efforts. There is a clear trend to is safer than it was 30 to 40 years ago, WHO 2005 choose vacuum extractor over forceps to assist delivery global study reported a higher rate of CS was associated but evidence supports increased neonatal injury with with greater risk of maternal and perinatal mortality & vacuum extraction and lower failure rate with forceps, morbidity compared to vaginal delivery.5 This fact is depending upon the clinical circumstances 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Completing the Facility Worksheets for the Certificate of Live Birth and Report of Fetal Death (2003 Revision)
    Updated March 2012 March 2003 Yellow Highlights indicate updated text. Guide to Completing The Facility Worksheets for the Certificate of Live Birth and Report of Fetal Death (2003 revision) Page 1 of 51 How To Use This Guide This guide was developed to assist in completing the facility worksheets for the revised Certificate of Live Birth and Report of Fetal Death. (Facility worksheet (FWS), Birth Certificate (BC), Facility worksheet for the Report of Fetal Death (FDFWS), Report of Fetal Death (FDR)) NOTE: All information on the mother should be for the woman who gave birth to, or delivered the infant. Definitions Instructions Sources Key Words/Abbreviations Defines the items in the order they Provides specific instructions for Identifies the sources in the Identifies alternative, usually appear on the facility worksheet completing each item medical records where information synonymous terms and common for each item can be found. The abbreviations and acronyms for specific records available will items. The keywords and differ somewhat from facility to abbreviations given in this guide are facility. The source listed first not intended as inclusive. Facilities (1st) is considered the best or and practitioners will likely add to preferred source. Please use this the lists. source whenever possible. All Example― subsequent sources are listed in Keywords/Abbreviations for order of preference. The precise prepregnancy diabetes are: location within the records where DM - diabetes mellitus an item can be found is further Type 1 diabetes identified by “under” and “or.” IDDM - Insulin dependent Example— diabetes mellitus Type 2 diabetes To determine whether gestational Non-insulin dependent diabetes diabetes is recorded as a “Risk mellitus factor in this Pregnancy” (item 14) Class B DM in the records: st Class C DM The 1 or best source is : Class D DM The prenatal care record.
    [Show full text]
  • Facility Worksheet for the Live Birth Certificate-Final
    Mother’s medical record # Mother’s name_ Child’s name/medical record # Attachment of ATTACHMENT TO THE FACILITY WORKSHEET FOR THE LIVE BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOR MULTIPLE BIRTHS This attachment is to be completed when at least two infants in a multiple pregnancy are born alive.* Complete a full worksheet for the first-born infant and an attachment for each additional live-born infant. A “Facility Worksheet for the Report of Fetal Death” should be completed for any fetal loss in this pregnancy reportable under State reporting requirements. Item numbers refer to item numbers on the full worksheets * For “Delayed Interval Births,” that is, births in a multiple pregnancy delivered at least 24 hours apart, a full worksheet, not an attachment should be completed. 7. Sex (Male, Female, or Not yet determined): __________________ 8. Time of birth: __ AM / PM 9. Date of birth: __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ M M D D Y Y Y Y 10. Infant’s medical record number: 11. Mother’s medical record number: _______________________________ NEWBORN Sources: Labor and delivery records, Newborn’s medical records, mother’s medical records 12. Birthweight: _______________ (grams) Note: Do not convert lb / oz to grams If weight in grams is not available, birthweight: _____________ (lb / oz) 13. Obstetric estimate of gestation at delivery (completed weeks): ________________ (The birth attendant’s final estimate of gestation based on all perinatal factors and assessments, but not the neonatal exam. Do not compute based on date of the last menstrual period and the date of birth.) Page 1 of 5 Rev 01/01/2010 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk PPS Flat File Interface Specifications
    Suffolk PPS Flat File Interface Specifications DSRIP Partner Message Processing August 13, 2015, V0400 © Cerner Corporation. All rights reserved. This document contains Cerner confidential and/or proprietary information belonging to Cerner Corporation and/or its related affiliates which may not be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the express written consent of Cerner. PREPARED BY: CERNER CORPORATION 51 VALLEY STREAM PARKWAY MALVERN, PENNSYLVANIA 19355 (610) 219-6300 Authors: Greg Quattlebaum, Manager, Enterprise Application Integration and Interoperability Amy Schlung, Senior Interface Architect, Data Integration Services File Name: Suffolk_Flat_Interface_Specs_081315_V0400.doc Copyright © Cerner Corporation. All rights reserved. OPENLinkTM is a trademark of Cerner Corporation. All other products and services that are referred to in this document are or may be trademarks of their respective owners. Suffolk Care Collaborative Flat File Interface Specifications Cerner Corporation 08/13/15, V0400 Page 2 of 72 Revision History and Acronyms and Meanings Revision History Version Date Author(s) Reason for Change V0100 22-Jul-2015 Greg Quattlebaum, Amy Schlung Initial Release V0200 03-Aug-2015 Greg Quattlebaum Client Changes V0300 11-Aug-2015 Greg Quattlebaum Client Changes – Add Standard Code Systems List and HL7 Code Systems and Value Sets V0400 13-Aug-2015 Greg Quattlebaum Client Changes – Move Code System Lists to end of document Acronyms Below is a list of acronyms and meanings used within this document. Acronym
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Three ~ Ending the Man-Made Cesarean Epidemic
    Chapter Three ~ Ending the Man-made Cesarean Epidemic There is an effective alternative to the default use of Cesarean as a replacement for normal birth -- a plan that safely reduces medical intervention and surgical delivery while meeting the physical, emotional and psycho-social needs of childbearing women and their unborn and newborn babies. It supplies the missing ingredient by requiring the obstetrical profession to learn, teach and utilize physiological management when providing care to healthy women with normal pregnancies. Unfortunately, there are a number of obstacles to achieving this goal. One reason that obstetricians are unprepared to provide physiologically-based care for a normal childbirth this is that medical schools do not teach the scientific principles of physiological management. The countervailing belief for the last century is that obstetrical intervention is the best way prevents complications associated with childbirth and that ‘failure’ to medicalized is negligent care. For the lay public, the problem is a strong but wrong assumption that normal birth in healthy women is inevitably dangerous for babies and damaging to the pelvic floor. Most people put their faith in the high-tech, high drama variety of obstetrics portrayed in the movies and TV shows such as ER and Gray’s Anatomy. This model is tightly focused on continuous electronic fetal monitoring (EFM -- the machine that goes ‘ping’) and ‘just in the nick of time’ C-sections to rescue babies. Whatever beliefs a pregnant woman and her close relatives may have about childbirth, all of them wants what is best for the baby and its mother. We all do.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Comparison of MEDCIN and SNOMED CT for Representation Of
    Direct Comparison of MEDCIN ® and SNOMED CT ® for Representation of a General Medical Evaluation Template Steven H. Brown MS MD 1,2 , S. Trent Rosenbloom MD MPH 2 , Brent A. Bauer MD 3, Dietli nd Wahner -Roedler MD 3, David A. Froehling, MD, Kent R, Bailey PhD, M ichael J Lincoln MD, Diane Montella MD 1, Elliot M. Fielstein PhD 1,2 Peter L. Elkin MD 3 1. Department of Veterans Affairs 2. Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN 3. Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN Background : Two candidate terminologies to efforts. Usable and functionally complete support entry of ge neral medical data are standard terminologies need to be available to SNOMED CT and MEDCIN . W e compare the systems designers and architects. Two candidate ability of SNOMED CT and MEDCIN to terminologies to support entry of general medical represent concepts and interface terms from a data are SNOMED CT and MED CIN . VA gener al medical examination template. Methods : We parsed the VA general medical SNOMED CT is a reference terminology that evaluation template and mapped the resulting has been recommended for various components expressions into SNOMED CT and MEDCIN . of patient medical record information by the Internists conducted d ouble independent reviews Consolidated Health Informatics Council and the on 864 expressions . Exact concept level matches National Committee on Vital and Health were used to evaluate reference coverage. Exact Statistics. (12) SNOMED CT, licensed for US - term level matches were required for interface wide use by the National Library of Medicine in terms. 2003, was evaluated in 15 M edline indexed Resul ts : Sensitivity of SNOMED CT as a studie s in 2006 .
    [Show full text]
  • Physician's Office Assistant with Electronic Health Records
    C.15.9 (Created 07-17-2017) AUBURN OFFICE OF P ROFESSIONAL AND CONTINUING ED UCATION Office of Professional & Continuing Education 301 OD Smith Hall | Auburn, AL 36849 http://www.auburn.edu/mycaa Contact: Shavon Williams | 334-844-3108; [email protected] Auburn University is an equal opportunity educational institution/employer. Education & Training Plan Physicians’ Office Assistant with Electronic Health Records Management Certificate Program with Clinical Externship Student Full Name: Start Date: End Date: Program includes National Certification & a Clinical Externship Opportunity Mentor Supported Physicians’ Office Assistant with Electronic Health Records Management (EHRM) Certificate Program with Clinical Externship Course Code: AU-PO 10 Program Duration: 6 Months Contact Hours: 780 Student Tuition: $3,950 This Physicians’ Office Assistant with Electronic Health Records Management (EHRM) training program combines two in-demand healthcare certifications with important front office Microsoft end user computer skills. The Physician’s Office Assistant Profession with EHRM Medical administrative assistants primarily work in doctor’s offices, clinics, outpatient settings, hospitals, and other healthcare settings. Medical administrative assistants, medical secretaries, and medical records clerks are all positions in great demand. The growth and the complexity of the U.S. healthcare system have resulted in a substantial increase in the need for qualified medical administrative assistants. Employment of a medical assistant is expected to grow an impressive 34% by 2018. The Electronic Health Record Management (EHRM) Profession Access to health information is changing the ways doctors care for patients. With the nation’s healthcare system moving to the electronic medical record, numerous employment opportunities exist for medical assistants, health information systems staff, patient registration professionals and other related positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care
    THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/10863 SHARE Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care DETAILS 550 pages | 6 x 9 | HARDBACK ISBN 978-0-309-09077-3 | DOI 10.17226/10863 AUTHORS BUY THIS BOOK Philip Aspden, Janet M. Corrigan, Julie Wolcott, Shari M. Erickson, Editors, Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety FIND RELATED TITLES Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care PATIENT SAFETY ACHIEVING A NEW STANDARD FOR CARE Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety Board on Health Care Services Philip Aspden, Janet M. Corrigan, Julie Wolcott, and Shari M. Erickson, Editors Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medi- cine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bony Pelvis
    King Khalid University Hospital Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Course 482 ABNORMAL PRESENTATION . Occipital bone is the landmark in vertex presentation. Mentum is landmark for face presentation, . Frontal bone is land mark for brow presentation MALPRESENTATIONS . Fetal lie . This is the relationship of the longitudinal axis of the fetus to longitudinal axis of the mother. There are three lies longitudinal , oblique , and transverse lie . Fetal attitude , this is the relationship of the different parts of the baby to each others , usually flexion attitude . Presentation. It is which part of the fetus occupies the pelvis eg ,cephalic , breech , shoulder presentation . BREECH PRESENTATION . Baby is presenting with buttocks and legs and incidence is 3% at term . Types . Complete breech where the leg are flexed at hip joint and knee joint , . Frank breech flexed hip but extended knee joint . Footling breech with extended hip and knee joints and high buttocks . Fetal causes . Hydrocephalas , poly hydramnios oligohydramnios , placenta previa , short umbilical cord . Maternal causes . Uterine anomalies, fibroid uterus, small pelvis . The most important cause is preterm labor MANAGEMENT . The patient can be offered the option of either vaginal breech delivery , caesarian section or external cephalic version . External cephalic version ECV . Done after 38 weeks. Contra indications . Contracted pelvis , scar uterus, placenta previa , hypertensive patient . Complications. Membrane rupture , uterine rupture, abruptio placenta , cord prolapse . Cont. It should be done in the theater with every thing ready four c/s . If blood group is rhesus negative should receive anti D immunoglobulin . Complications of vaginal breech delivery. Cord prolaps , lower limb fracture , abdominal organs injuries , brachial plexus nerve injuries, .
    [Show full text]
  • EHRM Certificate Program with Clinical Externship C5 (Created 9/3/15)
    C.15.5 (Created 07-17-2017) AUBURN OFFIC E OF P ROFESS IONAL A ND CONTINUI NG E D UCATION Office of Professional & Continuing Education 301 OD Smith Hall | Auburn, AL 36849 http://www.auburn.edu/mycaa Contact: Shavon Williams | 334-844-3108; [email protected] Auburn University is an equal opportunity educational institution/employer. Education & Training Plan Electronic Health Records Management Certificate Program with Clinical Externship Student Full Name: Start Date: End Date: Program includes National Certification & a Clinical Externship Opportunity Mentor Supported Electronic Health Records Management (EHRM) Certificate Program with Clinical Externship Course Code: AU-EH 06 Program Duration: 4 Months Contact Hours: 375 Student Tuition: $3,000 The Electronic Health Record Management Profession Access to health information is changing the ways doctors care for patients. With the nation’s healthcare system moving to the electronic medical record, numerous employment opportunities exist for medical assistants, health information systems staff, patient registration professionals and other related positions. Healthcare professionals with the ability to understand, update and maintain the electronic health record are in great demand. The Electronic Health Record Management Program This program prepares students to understand and use electronic records in a medical practice. Course reviews the implementation and management of electronic health information using common electronic data interchange systems and maintaining the medical, legal, accreditation and regulatory requirements of the electronic health record. This Electronic Health Record (EHR) Management program prepares students to understand and use electronic records in a medical practice. Course reviews the implementation and management of electronic health information using common electronic data interchange systems and maintaining the medical, legal, accreditation and regulatory requirements of the electronic health record.
    [Show full text]
  • National Library of Medicine Programs and Services FY2013
    NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH National Library of Medicine Programs and Services Fiscal Year 2013 US Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Bethesda, Maryland National Library of Medicine Catalog in Publication National Library of Medicine (US) National Library of Medicine programs and services.— Bethesda, Md.: The Library, [1978-] 1977 – v.: Report covers fiscal year. Continues: National Library of Medicine (US). Programs and Services. Vols. For 1977-78 issued as DHEW publication; no. (NIH) 78-256, etc.; for 1979-80 as NIH publication; no. 80-256, etc. Vols. 1981 – present Available from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va. Reports for 1997 – present issued also online. ISSN 0163-4569 = National Library of Medicine programs and services. 1. Information Services – United States – Periodicals 2. Libraries, Medical – United States – Periodicals I. Title II. Title: National Library of Medicine programs & services III. Series: DHEW publication; no. 78-256, etc. IV. Series: NIH publication; no. 80-256, etc. Z 675.M4U56an DISCRIMINATION PROHIBITED: Under provisions of applicable public laws enacted by Congress since 1964, no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, national origin, sex, or handicap, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. In addition, Executive Order 11141 prohibits discrimination on the basis of age by contractors and subcontractors in the performance of Federal contracts. Therefore, the National Library of Medicine must be operated in compliance with these laws and this executive order. ii CONTENTS Preface ........................................................................................................................................................................... v Office of Health Information Programs Development .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]