Tacitus' Germania: Background Hum 110, Reed College Prof. Laura

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Tacitus’ Germania: Background Hum 110, Reed College Prof. Laura Leibman Biography Life 55-117 AD Career Son-in-law of Gnaeus Julius Agricola Emperors Vespasian==>Titus ==>Domitian ==>Trajan The Agricola --Tacitus takes advantage of the revival of freedom under Domitian to publish his first historical work, in honor of his father-in-law, Agricola, the conqueror of a large part of Britain --Contents: in it he briefly summarizes Agricola’s career, focuses on the conquest of the island and takes sometime out for ethnographic and geographic digressions. --Genre: predominately a res gestae (focuses on remarkable deeds), but also is an intersection of several other genres: biography, laudatio funeraris, history, ethnography. --Purpose: teaches how to serve honorably under a terrible princeps The Germania --Topic: barbarian virtue and Roman corruption --Ethnography: derived from written sources NOT direct observation: he improves upon and embellishes the style of earlier accounts (e.g. the Bella Germaniae!of Pliny the Elder), adds details to bring the work up to date. --Theories about his intention: 1. The "glorification of a primitive, naive culture, one not yet corrupted by the refined vices of a decadent civilization" 2. In stressing the untamed strength and valor of the Germans in war, Tacitus intends to stress the threat they pose, not to praise them 3. In stressing the "nobleness" of the primitive, Tacitus is really critiquing the notion of "civilization" and undermining the notion of aristocracy in general (application of Hayden White's notion of the "Noble Savage Theme as Fetish"). Bibliography Conte, Gian Biagio. Latin Literature: A History White, Hayden, "The Noble Savage Theme as Fetish," Tropics of Discourse..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Domitian's Dacian War Domitian'in Daçya Savaşi
2020, Yıl 4, Sayı 13, 75 - 102 DOMITIAN’S DACIAN WAR DOMITIAN’IN DAÇYA SAVAŞI DOI: 10.33404/anasay.714329 Çalışma Türü: Araştırma Makalesi / Research Article1 Gökhan TEKİR* ABSTRACT Domitian, who was one of the most vilified Roman emperors, had suf- fered damnatio memoriae by the senate after his assassination in 96. Senator historians Tacitus and Cassius Dio ignored and criticized many of Domitian’s accomplishments, including the Dacian campaign. Despite initial setbacks in 86 and 87, Domitian managed to push the invading Dacians into the Dacian terri- tory and even approached to the Dacian capital in 88. However, the Saturninus revolt and instability in the Chatti and Pannonia in 89 prevented Domitian from concluding the campaign. The peace treaty stopped the Dacian incursions and made Dacia a dependent state. It is consistent with Domitian’s non-expansionist imperial policy. This peace treaty stabilized a hostile area and turned Dacia a client kingdom. After dealing with various threats, he strengthened the auxiliary forces in Dacia, stabilizing the Dacian frontier. Domitian’s these new endeavors opened the way of the area’s total subjugation by Trajan in 106. Keywords: Domitian, Roman Empire, Dacia, Decebalus, security 1- Makale Geliş Tarihi: 03. 04. 2020 Makale Kabül Tarihi: 15. 08. 2020 * Doktor, Email: [email protected] ORCID ID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3985-7442 75 DomItIan’s DacIan War ÖZ Domitian 96 yılında düzenlenen suikast sonucunda hakkında senato tarafından ‘hatırası lanetlenen’ ve hakkında en çok karalama yapılan Roma imparatorlarından birisidir. Senatör tarihçilerden olan Tacitus ve Cassius Dio, Domitian’ın bir çok başarısını görmezden gelmiş ve eleştirmiştir.
[Show full text]
Roman Conquest, Occupation and Settlement of Wales AD 47–410
no nonsense Roman Conquest, Occupation and Settlement of Wales AD 47–410 – interpretation ltd interpretation Contract number 1446 May 2011 no nonsense–interpretation ltd 27 Lyth Hill Road Bayston Hill Shrewsbury SY3 0EW www.nononsense-interpretation.co.uk Cadw would like to thank Richard Brewer, Research Keeper of Roman Archaeology, Amgueddfa Cymru – National Museum Wales, for his insight, help and support throughout the writing of this plan. Roman Conquest, Occupation and Settlement of Wales AD 47-410 Cadw 2011 no nonsense-interpretation ltd 2 Contents 1. Roman conquest, occupation and settlement of Wales AD 47410 .............................................. 5 1.1 Relationship to other plans under the HTP............................................................................. 5 1.2 Linking our Roman assets ....................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Sites not in Wales .................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Criteria for the selection of sites in this plan .......................................................................... 9 2. Why read this plan? ...................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Aim what we want to achieve ........................................................................................... 10 2.2 Objectives.............................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
LAT 300.01: Tacitus - Agricola
University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Syllabi Course Syllabi 1-2002 LAT 300.01: Tacitus - Agricola Linda W. Gillison University of Montana - Missoula, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/syllabi Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Gillison, Linda W., "LAT 300.01: Tacitus - Agricola" (2002). Syllabi. 3395. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/syllabi/3395 This Syllabus is brought to you for free and open access by the Course Syllabi at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Syllabi by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Latin 300: Tacitus, Agricola Spring, 2002 Gillison Course objectives: The text for this semester is Tacitus’ Agricola, a work which combines biography, ethnography, and political critique in a particularly “Tacitean” manner. Central to our discussions will be the concept of “rhetorical history” as the Romans knew and composed it, and you will learn to compare and contrast Roman historiography and it’s modern relative. We will translate the monograph and investigate in the process various elements of Roman history, historiography, and historical research. We will read Cicero’s recommendations about the writing of history and you will learn to discuss Tacitus’ relationship to those recommendations. We will look into numismatics epigraphy and you will learn to discuss their uses in the modern historian’s hands. We will place Tacitus’ works in historical context.. Each student will make an oral presentation to the class and will write an essay focused on Tacitus’ mode of historiography.
[Show full text]
MONS GRAUPIUS Alternative Names: None Late 83 Or 84 CE Date Published: July 2016 Date of Last Update to Report: N/A
Inventory of Historic Battlefields Research report This battle was researched and assessed against the criteria for inclusion on the Inventory of Historic Battlefields set out in Historic Environment Scotland Policy Statement June 2016 https://www.historicenvironment.scot/advice-and- support/planning-and-guidance/legislation-and-guidance/historic-environment- scotland-policy-statement/. The results of this research are presented in this report. The site does not meet the criteria at the current time as outlined below (see reason for exclusion). MONS GRAUPIUS Alternative Names: None Late 83 or 84 CE Date published: July 2016 Date of last update to report: N/a Overview The Battle of Mons Graupius is the best documented engagement between the Roman forces, stationed in southern Britannia, and the Caledonian tribes of the northern part of the island. It marked the culmination of multiple years of campaigning by the Roman governor of the province, Gnaeus Julius Agricola, against the “barbarian” tribes and he inflicted a resounding defeat on the confederacy of Caledonians arrayed against him. Much of what is known about the battle is contained within the Agricola, written in 97-98 CE by Agricola’s son in law, the Roman historian Tacitus. This is a heavily biased and only partially surviving account which amounts to a veneration of Agricola. There are no indigenous accounts of the battle and no archaeological evidence has been confirmed as connected to the conflict. Although the site has drawn attention from academics since antiquarian times, the precise date, location and the vast majority of details of the engagement remain unconfirmed. Reason for exclusion There is no certainty about the location of the battle, and there are also significant questions about the accuracy of the accounts describing it.
[Show full text]
Who's Anti-Roman? Sallust and Pompeius Trogus on Mithridates." Classical Journal 101.4 (N.D.): 383-407
Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Classics Faculty Publications Classics Department 4-2006 Who’s Anti-Roman? Sallust and Pompeius Trogus on Mithridates Eric Adler Connecticut College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/classfacpub Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Adler, E. "Who's Anti-Roman? Sallust And Pompeius Trogus On Mithridates." Classical Journal 101.4 (n.d.): 383-407. Web. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classics Department at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classics Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. WHO'S ANTI-ROMAN? SALLUST AND POMPEIUS TROGUS ON MITHRIDATES Abstract: Contemporary scholars of Roman imperialism have discussed the ways in which ancient historians denigrate non-Romans and thereby present intellectual justificationsfor Roman conquest. This paper offers a case study that questions this position's validity: an examination of Sallust's Epistula Mithridatis (Hist. 4.69M) and Pompeius Trogus' speech of Mithridates (Justin 38.4-7). I argue that Sallust offers a more powerful attack on Roman foreign policy than does Trogus, whom many scholars have deemed "anti-Roman," and conclude that Roman historiansare capable of using
[Show full text]
Romans and Barbarians in Tacitus' Battle Narratives
ROMANS AND BARBARIANS IN TACITUS’ BATTLE NARRATIVES by RYAN MICHAEL SEEGER (Under the direction of Dr. Susan Mattern-Parkes) ABSTRACT The purpose of the study is to examine how Tacitus constructs ethnic stereotypes, namely those of the Romans and of the barbarians, in his battle narratives. The first section of the study explores his descriptions of technical aspects of the battle narrative, such as topography, use of weaponry, battle formations, and sieges. The second section examines the value judgments that Tacitus makes about the combatants and their actions, discussing the themes of discipline and virtus, as well as the leaders’ ability to lead by example and stifle dissent. In his descriptions of both the technical and the “moral” aspects of battle, Tacitus shapes his Romans quite differently from his barbarians. Tacitus constructs identities in his battle narratives possibly to satisfy his audience’s expectations or to make the scenes more understandable. Such constructions indicate that ethnocentrism plays an important role in Latin historiography, revealing racial prejudice in Roman society. INDEX WORDS: Tacitus, battle narratives, Roman army, barbarians, ethnicity. ROMANS AND BARBARIANS IN TACITUS’ BATTLE NARRATIVES by RYAN MICHAEL SEEGER B. A., Appalachian State University, 1998 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2002 © 2002 Ryan Michael Seeger All Rights Reserved ROMANS AND BARBARIANS IN TACITUS’ BATTLE NARRATIVES by RYAN MICHAEL SEEGER Approved: Major Professor: Susan Mattern-Parkes Committee: James Anderson Erika Thorgerson-Hermanowicz Electronic Version Approved: Gordhan L. Patel Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia August 2002 iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Several people were instrumental in the completion of this thesis.
[Show full text]
On the March with the Romans Roman Campaigns to Conquer All of Caledonia (Scotland) Were Conducted Between the 1St and 3Rd Centuries A.D
On the March with the Romans Roman campaigns to conquer all of Caledonia (Scotland) were conducted between the 1st and 3rd centuries A.D. by the Governor of Britannia, Gnaeus Julius Agricola and Emperors Lucius Aurelius Commodus and Septimius Severus. There were large camps across Scotland and one beside Stonehaven (Raedykes) and one near Inverness (Cawdor) were linked by roads incorporating marching camps, where the troops would rest between transits. On the main trunk routes between Keith and Stonehaven, there are 6 of these Roman marching camps close by the A96 and A90. Unfortunately, there is not much left to see now but if you’re driving between Inverness and Stonehaven on the A96 to the Craibstone junction and thence south on Southern Leg and then Fastlink of the AWPR before meeting the A92 at Stonehaven, you will be travelling not too far from the route taken by the Romans, marching to invade the northernmost parts of Caledonia, more than 1800 years ago. The tents show approximate positions on the map details shown below. Muiryfold: OS ref: NJ 489 520; 5km east of Keith There are little traces of the 100 acres marching camp here, some 5 km from Keith. The camp was used during the campaign by Emperor Severus who reached as far as the Moray Firth in his campaign to conquer all of Caledonia. Ythan Wells or Glenmaillan: OS ref: NJ 655 382 5½ km north of the Kirkton of Culsalmond A96 junction with the A920 to Oldmeldrum. There are traces of 2 marching camps 2km east of Ythanwells.
[Show full text]
Tacitus: the Tradition and Its Breaking
CHAPTER SEVEN TACITUS: THE TRADITION AND ITS BREAKING Because of the multiplicity of his works and his skill in the art of prose, Tacitus' use of gender terms ranges from the conventional to the subtle. At times he is traditional: in Agricola, Germania and the Histories, works said to reflect elements of Cicero and Livy, 1 Roman viri, of whom Agricola is the foremost, arefortissimi, militares, or inlustres; 2 and their feminae are nobilissimae, primores and conspicuae.3 Tacitus often applies gender epithets to minor characters in order to clarify their position in the hectic events of the narrative. 4 In the Annales, he uses vir and femina with adjectives of rank in order to emphasize Julio-Claudian oppression of the aristocacy; in such cases the nouns preserve their traditional overtones of moral excellence. The repetition of words has a cumulative impact upon the reader. 5 Thus the iteration of feminae inlustres in contexts of victimization stresses the brutal tyranny of the Julio-Claudians against women of the senatorial class. Mulieres in general are not being oppressed, but rather Rome's finestfeminae with all their inherent virtues. For instance, Junia Silana, nobilis femina, is hounded out of her home by Messalina (Ann. 11.12.7); Calpumia, inlustris femina, falls victim to Agrippina's jealousy (Ann. 12.22.12; 1 R.M. Ogilvie notes Tacitus' debt in his early works to Cicero, Sallust, and Livy: Corne Ii Taciti de Vita Agrico/ae (Oxford, 1967) 22; 26; cf. R. Martin, who cites Ciceronianisms in the Histories: Tacitus (London, 1981) 231. 2 Agricola does not lament muliebriter for the deaths of fortes viri, including his son (Ag.
[Show full text]
Histo Ry: Cohors I Batavorum
Legio XIIII Gemina Martia Victrix Cohors I Batavorum Cohors I Hamiorum Via Romana The Auxilia. From the early days of the Republic, the Roman army had supplemented its strength with auxiliary (literally “help”) troops. When people think of the Roman Army there is a tendency to think of the legions themselves and to forget the considerable con- tribution made to the Roman war machine by the numerous auxiliary cohorts that provided vital support in a number of areas. While the Roman legions were undeniably the most effective fighting force of their age, the Romans themselves had never managed to suc- cessfully develop their military forces beyond the legionary formations. Accordingly the lack of cavalry, archers, slingers, etc. was made good by recruiting non-Roman peoples into cohorts of 500 (quingenaria) and 1000 (milliaria) men. These tended to be one of three types; light infantry, cavalry or combined units of cavalry and infantry. Auxiliary troops were levied from the conquered provinces and were named after the lo- cality of origination. The period of service for an auxiliary soldier was roughly 25 years after which time he could be discharged with a small gratuity and, most precious of all, a diploma conferring Roman citizenship on himself and his heirs. For acts of bravery it was more likely that citizenship, either for individuals, or for the unit as a whole, was awarded. Cohorts and Alae, like the Legions, could be given honorary awards such as "VICTRIX" or carry an Imperial family name. Some units, for example COHORS I BRITTONUM MIL- LIARIA ULPIA TORQUATA PIA FIDELIS CIVIUM ROMANORUM, or COHORS I FIDA VARDULLORUM MILLIARIA EQUITATA CIVIUM ROMANORUM, could amass many ti- tles.
[Show full text]
Sallust's Histories and Triumviral Historiography
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Sallust's Histories and Triumviral Historiography Jennifer Gerrish University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Gerrish, Jennifer, "Sallust's Histories and Triumviral Historiography" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 511. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/511 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/511 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sallust's Histories and Triumviral Historiography Abstract This dissertation explores echoes of the triumviral period in Sallust's Histories and demonstrates how, through analogical historiography, Sallust presents himself as a new type of historian whose "exempla" are flawed and morally ambiguous, and who rejects the notion of a triumphant, ascendant Rome perpetuated by the triumvirs. Just as Sallust's unusual prose style is calculated to shake his reader out of complacency and force critical engagement with the reading process, his analogical historiography requires the reader to work through multiple layers of interpretation to reach the core arguments. In the De Legibus, Cicero lamented the lack of great Roman historians, and frequently implied that he might take up the task himself. He had a clear sense of what history ought to be : encomiastic and exemplary, reflecting a conception of Roman history as a triumphant story populated by glorious protagonists. In Sallust's view, however, the novel political circumstances of the triumviral period called for a new type of historiography. To create a portrait of moral clarity is, Sallust suggests, ineffective, because Romans have been too corrupted by ambitio and avaritia to follow the good examples of the past.
[Show full text]
ERIC ADLER, Effectiveness and Empire in Tacitus' Agricola
The Ancient History Bulletin VOLUME THIRTY: 2016 NUMBERS 1-2 Edited by: Edward Anson ò Michael Fronda òDavid Hollander Timothy Howe òJoseph Roisman ò John Vanderspoel Pat Wheatley ò Sabine Müller ISSN 0835-3638 ANCIENT HISTORY BULLETIN Volume 30 (2016) Numbers 1-2 Edited by: Edward Anson, Michael Fronda, David Hollander, Sabine Müller, Joseph Roisman, John Vanderspoel, Pat Wheatley Senior Editor: Timothy Howe Editorial correspondents Elizabeth Baynham, Hugh Bowden, Franca Landucci Gattinoni, Alexander Meeus, Kurt Raaflaub, P.J. Rhodes, Robert Rollinger, Victor Alonso Troncoso Contents of volume thirty Numbers 1-2 1 Eric Adler, Effectiveness and Empire in Tacitus’ Agricola 15 Jens Jakobsson, Dating of Timarchus, the Median Usurper. A Critical Review 27 Salvatore Vacante, Wetlands and Environment in Hellenistic Sicily: Historical and Ecological Remarks 43 Andrzej Dudziński, Diodorus' use of Timaeus NOTES TO CONTRIBUTORS AND SUBSCRIBERS The Ancient History Bulletin was founded in 1987 by Waldemar Heckel, Brian Lavelle, and John Vanderspoel. The board of editorial correspondents consists of Elizabeth Baynham (University of Newcastle), Hugh Bowden (Kings College, London), Franca Landucci Gattinoni (Università Cattolica, Milan), Alexander Meeus (University of Leuven), Kurt Raaflaub (Brown University), P.J. Rhodes (Durham University), Robert Rollinger (Universität Innsbruck), Victor Alonso Troncoso (Universidade da Coruña) AHB is currently edited by: Timothy Howe (Senior Editor: [email protected]), Edward Anson, Michael Fronda, David Hollander, Sabine Müller, Joseph Roisman, John Vanderspoel and Pat Wheatley. AHB promotes scholarly discussion in Ancient History and ancillary fields (such as epigraphy, papyrology, and numismatics) by publishing articles and notes on any aspect of the ancient world from the Near East to Late Antiquity.
[Show full text]
Anna Balaguer an Analysis of the Literary Purpose of Tacitus
Anna Balaguer An Analysis of the Literary Purpose of Tacitus’ Germania May 2019 Senior Thesis in Classics, Colorado College 2 Acknowledgements I want to acknowledge my amazing professors, Owen, Marcia, Sanjaya, Richard, and Ane for their guidance and help with my thesis and their support throughout my time at CC and to thank Khang for his help with the translations for this project. I am grateful to the Boettcher Foundation for providing me access to this excellent education. I also want to thank my parents for having instilled in me a love of learning and my best friends, Caroline and Dylan, for always being supportive. 3 My Interest in this Topic I originally became interested in the relationship between Rome and Germany when I studied abroad in Germany in Fall 2017 and visited an exhibit on the Roman history of the city of Regensburg. After reading more about the history of ancient Roman imperialism in Germany and the political mobilization of Roman history throughout German history, I was incredibly intrigued and wanted to further explore the connection between Rome and Germany. Originally, I thought of focusing my thesis on the Roman history of Trier (a city in southwest Germany with a very high density of extant Roman ruins), but then chose to investigate this topic through my German Capstone and instead center my Classics thesis on the Germania, as I was interested in the divergent interpretations and complex history of the book’s reception. I initially read A Most Dangerous Book, by Christopher Krebs, which focuses on the Nazi use of the text and planned to use my thesis to examine some aspect of the modern reception of the Germania, but as I began to explore the text itself, I became increasingly interested in Tacitus’ rhetorical strategies and subtle political messages and decided to focus on these aspects of the text.
[Show full text]