Task Force Policy Report on Democracy in the European Union Winter 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Task Force Policy Report on Democracy in the European Union Winter 2010 Transnational Democracy in the European Union: Confronting the Democratic Deficit Task Force Advisor Professor Sabine Lang Task Force Evaluator Conny Reuter President of the EU Social Platform, Secretary General of the NGO Solidar Task Force Editors Samuel Garfield Kaitlyn Sweeting Task Force Members Jacquelyn Allen Annie Atherton Sean Brannen Jacob Barr Jiadai Dong Jacquelyn Ganger Anna Lee Meleah Paull Anastasia Plotnikova Zachary Russell Nathan Sooter Alisa Tonge Brent Waller Task Force 2010 The Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies University of Washington Task Force Policy Report on Democracy in the European Union Winter 2010 Advisor Sabine Lang Task Force Editors/Coordinators Samuel Garfield Kaitlyn Sweeting Task Force Members Jacquelyn Allen Annie Atherton Jacob Barr Sean Brannen Jidai Dong Jacquelyn Ganger Anna Lee Meleah Paull Anastasia Plotnikova Zachary Russell Nathan Sooter Alisa Tonge Brent Waller Table of Contents Chapter Page Executive Summary Report Introduction 1 Institutions of the European Union Section Introduction 12 1. The European Commission 15 2. The Council of the EU and European Council 31 3. The European Parliament 45 Civil Society in the European Union Section Introduction 64 4. “Europeanizing” Civil Society 68 5. Balancing Social and Civic Interest Representation 92 6. Enhancing Grassroots Participation in European Politics 111 The European Public Sphere Section Introduction 130 7. Mass Media and the European Public Sphere 134 8. New Media and the European Public Sphere 149 9. Public Events in the European Union 171 EU Citizenship and Identity Section Introduction 189 10. Strengthening EU Citizenship 194 11. Citizen Education 209 12. Improving Avenues for Direct Citizen Participation 229 13. Minority Groups in the European Union 250 Report Conclusion 270 Recommendations 275 Bibliography 285 Executive Summary By Samuel Garfield & Kaitlyn Sweeting The European Union serves as the transnational governing body for 27 nations and their citizens. Its significance on the world stage as well as within its Member States as a policymaker, legislator, and leader of world affairs is expansive. As such, the EU should strive to reach its fullest potential as a democratic institution, taking all actions necessary to promote and protect democracy. This is especially vital today, as the EU is currently facing a democratic deficit. Our report explores the democratic deficit within the EU as it is revealed in four primary policy areas; 1. Institutions a. Overall institutions are performing better than the public perceives them to be in terms of transparency, but there is still room for improvement. A particular area of improvement is posting information on the internet in a way that is accessible to citizens. b. Expanding the power of the Parliament and the number and type of officials who are elected will be increasingly important 2. Civil Society a. While the EU has taken great strides to reach out to civil society, it must continue to improve its methods of outreach. Ways of doing this include standardizing guidelines for consultation across all major EU institutions and reforming the makeup of EU civil society umbrella groups to represent public and private interests equally. b. Civil society itself has not yet "Europeanized," and the European Union should do all it can to promote a Europeanized civil society that transcends national boundaries. 3. Public Sphere a. The European public sphere is underdeveloped and highly fragmented along national and linguistic lines; the EU could be doing a great deal more to combat this, such as funding and promoting public broadcasting (which tends to address European issues more frequently) and improving its own new media programs. 4. European Citizenship and Identity a. Citizen participation in elections and other forms of political engagement is extremely low, inhibiting government officials from representing constituents and minimizing citizens’ knowledge of the EU and its functions. Opportunities for citizen engagement should therefore be increased and made more accessible, in order to make citizens more aware of their protections under the EU as well as the many ways it serves to benefit their daily lives. b. Minority groups are also severely underrepresented and mistreated within the EU, demonstrating that prejudice is still a major force in Europe. Many challenges must be addressed within these four realms of European governance in order for the European Union to eliminate its democratic deficit. Four prominent themes, however, emerged as central components that should take precedence in the EU’s efforts to diminish its democratic deficit. The EU should prioritize addressing its citizens’ lack of knowledge of the EU. Utilizing mass media campaigns and education to provide accessible, easily understood information about the EU, its functioning, and its policy perspectives are excellent means for accomplishing this. We also encourage the EU to focus largely on increasing its transparency by improving media relations and the accessibility of its policymakers, institutions, important documents, and so forth in order to better equip citizens to participate in political engagement. The EU should prioritize the establishment of a well-developed civil society as well in order to “Europeanize” the political realms within nations. Lastly, the establishment of a European identity that unites citizens of the EU and connects them to this transnational governing body that currently feels very distant and removed will be central. In accordance with these themes, we recommend: - Taking incremental steps towards popular election of the Commission - Expanding the budgetary and legislative capacities of the European Parliament - Ensuring 20% of broadcasting time is reserved for European programming - Establishing “Europe Week” - Increasing language translation capability of EU new media programs - Fostering the growth of “European” civil society - Creating standardized guidelines for lobbying and a mandatory register for interest groups - Encouraging EU civil society umbrella organizations to increase outreach to their constituencies - Using targeted media campaigns to educate citizens about the European Ombusdman and Citizens’ Initiative - Creating a European civic education curriculum - Supporting access to social welfare as a fundamental right as outlined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Ensuring timely implementation of anti-discrimination legislation in Member States Report Introduction: Pursuing Transnational Democracy in the EU By Samuel Garfield and Kaitlyn Sweeting 1 Report Introduction: Pursuing Transnational Democracy in the EU The Expansion of the European Union On December 1, 2009, the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty expanded the role, power, and functioning of the European Union. Its passage may be seen as only the most recent development in a long and sustained period of expansion for the EU. Since its establishment in the 195s, the EU has grown from an economic and political alliance of six western European nations to a 27 member, transnational governing body that has managed its own currency—the Euro—since 2002 and has established itself as a world leader for environmental and peacekeeping efforts. Despite drastically increasing its membership and influence over the last half-century, the EU faced a major setback in 2005. France and the Netherlands refused to ratify the proposed European Constitution, spurring a two-year, “period of reflection.” The Constitution—the outcome of years of work amongst integrationist European leaders—was seen as the key to formalizing the EU‟s status as a supra- and trans-national governing body. In 2007, progress towards this goal resumed as the development of a Reform Treaty commenced at the Intergovernmental Conference in Lisbon. The result was the Lisbon Treaty, which aims to establish a more democratic and efficient EU and improve its relationship with the European people. Although Ireland‟s refusal to ratify the Treaty in June 2008 slowed the process of implementing the Lisbon Treaty, on December 1, 2009 it was ratified by all 27 members of the EU and thereafter entered force as a legally binding treaty. As it has grown in importance the European Union has also received growing amounts of criticism for its lack of democracy. The Lisbon Treaty attempted to address a number of these issues—especially ones pertaining to the institutional functioning of the governing organs of the EU, including a lack of transparency and accountability and a lack of power on the part of the 2 Transnational Democracy in the European Union: Confronting the Democratic Deficit one elected EU body, the European Parliament—and other issues still remain unaddressed—such as the lack of a European demos, fragmentation of European polities along national and linguistic lines, and the failure of civil society to effectively bridge the gap between European citizens and the European Union‟s governing organs. As the EU grows in power and size how these issues will be addressed remains an open question. The purpose of this report is to examine the prospects for addressing the most important of these issues and making recommendations as to how the EU may best tackle them. Is the EU a Governmental Institution? One of the first issues this report must address is the role of the EU. Many critics who assert that the EU is sufficiently democratic do so on the grounds that it is not a governmental body, but an inter-governmental treaty organization. For
Recommended publications
  • Fighting for Human Rights Has Been a Guiding Principle Throughout My Life and Career and I Want to Commit My Passion and Energy to FRA
    1. Could you describe the reasons of your application for the post and why you consider yourself suitable for the post? Fighting for human rights has been a guiding principle throughout my life and career and I want to commit my passion and energy to FRA. While some may take fundamental rights in Europe for granted, data shows there is still much work to be done. High levels of anti-Semitism, discrimination against Roma and persons with disabilities, violence against women and LGBTI people, violation of children’s rights, racism and hate speech and discrimination based on race or religion are just some examples. To ensure that fundamental rights can become a reality for all in the EU, we need to further increase the impact and visibility of FRA's work. A lawyer by education, I started my career in the European Commission's external relations DG. Later I had the privilege of working on the historical accession of the new Member States to the EU as cabinet member and later Spokeswoman for Commissioner Van den Broek. The Commission’s reporting on the Copenhagen criteria, including on human rights, was a crucial element supporting transition, also by strengthening local actors to advocate for change. In 1999, I was elected to the European Parliament, where I served, inter alia, as vice-president of the Justice and Civil Liberties Committee. After a term in the Dutch national parliament - where I was spokeswoman on justice, police, terrorism, human rights and equal opportunities - I served as chief of staff to the President of the International Criminal Court (ICC).
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Teachers Module 6 - European Parliament Role Play Game
    GUIDELINES FOR TEACHERS MODULE 6 - EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ROLE PLAY GAME This role play game puts your pupils in the shoes of a Member of the European Parliament. For one to two hours, your classroom becomes the European Parliament itself, and your pupils discuss how they would tackle current EU topics like global warming, tobacco rules and an EU army. This role play game will help your pupils to develop their democratic skills. These skills include developing a critical opinion, debating skills and learning to make compromises. First, pupils work in smaller groups - parliamentary committees - on a legislative proposal from the European Commission. They use a game board with thematic cards. While amending the legislative proposal, they must take into account the different points of view of the Council of the European Union and other stakeholders. There are five topics to choose from, of different difficulty levels. Second, there is a plenary debate in class, where the groups present their adapted laws. This is followed by a class vote. Finally, there is a thorough debriefing and evaluation of the role play game, pointing out the similarities and differences between the classroom exercise and reality. METHODOLOGY DURATION MATERIALS Role play game: work 25 mins - Game board for each group in parliamentary committees - Worksheet for each group - Set of theme cards for each group. The cards need to be printed on one side and cut out. - Thematic legislative proposal of the European Commission for each group. Role play game: 10 mins per - Blackboard/flipchart + chalk/marker plenary debate and theme vote - Filled-in worksheet for each group Debriefing and 15 mins to 1 - Computer + projector evaluation hour - Presentation of part 6 Disclaimer Neither the form nor the content of this exercise offer a complete and correct representation of reality, nor do they represent the actual points of view of the European Parliament, the European Commission, the Council of the European Union or the lobby groups.
    [Show full text]
  • RUG/DNPP/Repository Redevoeringen/D66/2006/Lousewies Van Der
    Congrestoespraak Lousewies van der Laan 7 oktober 2006, 15:00 Toespraak van Lousewies van der Laan tijdens het Jubileumcongres op 7 oktober in Amsterdam Democraten, Ik heb niet een hele speech voorbereid, met een kop en staart enzo. Maar ik zal proberen er bij in de buurt te komen. Want ik ben toch heel blij dat ik hier vandaag namens de Tweede Kamerfractie wat mag zeggen. Want het is goed gebruik bij ons in de partij dat jullie vertegenwoordigers in het Parlement ook hier verantwoording afleggen over wat wij doen. Bijvoorbeeld in relatie tot het kabinetsbeleid.Want misschien heeft u er iets over gelezen, er zijn wat dat betreft wel een paar dingetjes gebeurd sinds wij elkaar hier de laatste keer spraken. Want hoewel het congres tot twee keer toe nadrukkelijk heeft uitgesproken dat wij moesten deelnemen aan het kabinet Balkenende II, heeft de fractie toch de noodzaak gezien daaraan een einde te maken. Dat vraagt dus om een verklaring. Toen ik namens D66 de steun opzegde in het kabinet, had dat één reden. Namelijk dat het voor ons onacceptabel was dat mevrouw Verdonk gewoon minister van integratie en asiel zou blijven nadat zij acht uur lang aantoonbare onzin aan de kamer had verkocht in de gevoelige kwestie rond het Nederlanderschap van Ayaan Hirsi Ali. U bent het misschien alweer een beetje kwijt, maar Rita Verdonk hield bij hoog en laag vol dat zij niet anders kon handelen dan zij deed, toen zij zonder enig onderzoek en binnen luttle uren het paspoort van een kamerlid afpakte. Dat was een novum, een minister die effectief een lid van de Nederlandse volksvertegenwoordiging uitschakelde.
    [Show full text]
  • Central and Eastern Europe
    Central and Eastern Europe Germany National Affairs X. JLALFWAY THROUGH Chancellor Gerhard Schroder's four-year term it was clear that his Red-Green coalition—his own Social Democratic Party (SPD) together with the environmentalist Greens—had succeeded in co-opting the traditional agenda of the opposition Christian Democrats (CDU), leaving the opposition without a substantial issue. The government accomplished this by moving to the political center, primarily through a set of pro-business tax cuts that were expected to spur the economy. The conservative opposition was also handicapped by scandal. Former chan- cellor Helmut Kohl shocked the nation at the end of 1999 by refusing to clarify his role in the CDU's financial irregularities, and in January 2000 he resigned as honorary chairman of the party. The affair continued to get headlines through- out 2000 as more illegal payments during the Kohl years came to light. All that Kohl himself would acknowledge was his personal receipt of some $1 million not accounted for in the party's financial records, but he refused to name the donors. Considering his "word of honor" not to divulge the source of the money more important than the German law requiring him to do so, he compared his treat- ment by the German mass media to the Nazi boycott of Jewish stores during the Hitler regime. Most observers believed that Kohl would end up paying a fine and would not serve any jail time. The Kohl scandal triggered an internal party upheaval. Wolfgang Schauble, Kohl's successor as CDU leader, admitted in February that he too had taken un- reported campaign contributions, and was forced to resign.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution Template
    RESOLUTION BOOKLET September 30th – October 8th Zagreb, Croatia September 30th – October 8th | Zagreb, Croatia The 68th International Session was supported by: This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. 2 September 30th – October 8th | Zagreb, Croatia Programme of the General Assembly Friday, October 7th 2011 Opening of General Assembly 1. Committee on Employment and Social Affairs Coffee Break 2. Committee on Human Rights 3. Committee on Internal Markets and Consumer Affairs 4. Committee on Culture and Education II Lunch 5. Committee on Industry, Trade, Research and Energy I 6. Committee on Foreign Affairs II Coffee Break 7. Committee on Security and Defence 8. Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Saturday, October 8th 2011 1. Committee on Civil Liberties and Home Affairs 2. Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Coffee Break 3. Committee on Crisis 4. Committee on Culture and Education I 5. Committee on Development Lunch 6. Committee on Industry Research and Energy II 7. Committee on Foreign Affairs I 3 September 30th – October 8th | Zagreb, Croatia Procedure of the General Assembly General rules The wish to speak is indicated by raising the committee placard. The authority of the board is absolute. Procedure and time settings Presenting of the motion for the resolution (amendments, operative clauses) Points of information 3 minutes to explain the motion for the resolution 3 minutes to respond on the motion for the resolution Open debate 3 minutes to sum-up the debate Voting procedure Announcing the votes Friendly amendment A friendly amendment is a last minute modifications of a resolution in order to improve it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for a Stronger European Parliament
    The case for a stronger European Parliament Lousewies van der Laan November 2003 ABOUT THE AUTHOR Contents Lousewies van der Laan is a member of the Dutch Parliament and deputy leader of the Dutch Liberal Democratic Party D66. From 1999-2003 she was a member of the European Parliament, where she served as vice-president of the Committee on Civil Liberties, About the author Justice and Home Affairs, vice-president of the Committee on Budget Control and as member of the Bureau of the European Author’s acknowledgements Liberal Democrat Party. She is a founding member of the Campaign for Parliament Reform. Ms van der Laan previously worked at the 1 Introduction 1 European Commission in Brussels for seven years. 2 The need for a stronger European Parliament 5 ★ 3Powers and location 13 AUTHOR’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 How the Parliament should improve its own workings 31 Thanks to Herman Beun, Arjan Bouter, Dennis Hesseling, Huib 5 Summary of recommendations 41 Hudig, Laetitia Kröner, Elwin Lammers, Gabrielle and Rene Vine, and Craig Winneker, for either having read earlier versions of this paper, or for having being helpful in other important ways. I am pleased that the Campaign for Parliament Reform has been a success and would like to thank the co-founders for their support and inspiration during my four years in the European Parliament. I have written this paper in a personal capacity. Any errors of fact or judgement are my responsibility alone. ★ Copyright of this publication is held by the Centre for European Reform. You may not copy, reproduce, republish or circulate in any way the content from this publication except for your own personal and non- commercial use.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2000-2001
    europe activity 8 Oct. 2000 - 23 Oct. 2001 ilga report www.ilga-europe.org europe activity ilga report THANKS & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank everybody who HIVOS (the Netherlands), Homosexuelle supported the work of the Board over the Selbsthilfe e. V. (Germany), and the City of last twelve months. Without the commit- Rotterdam for generously funding specific ment and donations of many people and projects and activities of ILGA-Europe; the financial and other support of many (member) organisations this work would ◗ Homosexuelle Initiative (HOSI) Wien not have been possible. We cannot mention (Austria), UNISON, the public sector them all here but special thanks have to go union in the United Kingdom, and Fede- to the following: ratie Werkgroepen Homoseksualiteit (Bel- gium) for substantial financial contribu- ◗ Steffen Jensen who, as outgoing treasurer, tions to our work; The European Region of the continued to take care of ILGA-Europe’s International Lesbian and Gay finances and accounts until the end of the ◗ the European Commission for granting us Association calendar year 2000. Together with other core funding and its anti-discrimination activists of the Danish national gay and unit for the good co-operation; Avenue de Tervueren/ lesbian association LBL he also continued Tervurenlaan 94/1 to publish the Euro-Letter on behalf of ◗ MEPs Michael Cashman, Joke Swiebel, B-1040 Brussels ILGA-Europe, and on top of that Patsy Sörensen, Lousewies van der Laan, phone +32 2 732 54 88 remained in charge of our web-site; and Baroness
    [Show full text]
  • 9999/03 Mip/STCS/Mh 1 COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN UNION
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 2 June 2003 (03.06) THE EUROPEAN UNION (OR. fr) 9999/03 OJ/CRP1 21 PROVISIONAL AGENDA for : Meeting of the PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE (Part 1) dated : Wednesday 4 (11.00) June 2003 1. Adoption of the agenda I (1) 2. Written questions put to the Council by Members of the European Parliament (a) No 3865/02 by Jules MAATEN and Lousewies VAN DER LAAN "Indonesia's ad hoc tribunals on East Timor" 9394/03 PE-QE 231 (b) No 60/03 by Camilo NOGUEIRA ROMÁN "Rejection by the Council of the European Parliament and Commission proposal concerning the establishment of a COPE fund from which to pay compensation for pollution caused by oil spills" 9395/03 PE-QE 232 (c) No 121/03 by Bob VAN DEN BOS "North Korean refugees" 9396/03 PE-QE 233 (d) No 191/03 by Erik MEIJER "The increasing extent to which US criteria are being put forward for acceptance or refusal of new Member States by the EU" 9397/03 PE-QE 234 9999/03 mip/STCS/mh 1 EN (e) Nos 717/03 and 719/03 by Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS "Prestige: Re-routing of maritime transport corridors" "Prestige: EU action at WTO level" 8612/03 PE-QE 198 + COR 1 (en) (f) No 345/03 by Hans-Peter MARTIN "HGV transit problems" 9398/03 PE-QE 235 (g) No 812/03 by Maurizio TURCO and others "War on drugs in Thailand" 8613/03 PE-QE 199 (h) No 823/03 by Christel FIEBIGER "Ban on Nifursol" 8614/03 PE-E 200 (i) No 839/03 by Mario MAURO "Alterations to the technical and administrative structure of Genoa airport" 8615/03 PE-QE 201 (j) No 878/03 by Graham WATSON "Pre-stunning of animals in Greek slaughterhouses" 8616/03 PE-QE 202 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana, Blue Hall, Friday November 28, 10 – 11.30 Am
    Panel Discussion and Debate ‘the Future of Europe: the Rule of Law’ Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana, Blue hall, Friday November 28, 10 – 11.30 am. 10.00 Welcome 10.05 Dean of the Faculty of Law, Prof Dr Miha Juhart Netherlands’ Ambassador Pieter J. Langenberg President of the National Assembly, Prof Dr Milan Brglez 10.15 Introduction by Dr Vasilka Sancin, Faculty of Law 10.25 Start of panel discussion 11.10 Public debate and questions 11.30 End of Program The event is organized by the Embassy of the Netherlands, in cooperation with the European Parliament Information Office in Slovenia and the Faculty of Law of the University of Ljubljana. Dr Milan Brglez: politician, political scientists, professor, lawyer President of the National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia from the 1st of August 2014 and Deputy of the National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia in the Party of Miro Cerar Deputy Group, 2011-2014 Vice President, Slovenian Red Cross, Professor at the Faculty of Social Sciences from 2006-2014, covered topics: Diplomatic and Consular Relations, Theory of International Relations, Selected Topics of International Law, Selected Topics of Diplomatic Law, European Protection of Human Rights and Teaching Assistant at the same Faculty of Social Sciences 1996-2006, covered subjects: Diplomatic and Consular Relations, International Law Policy, International Relations Dr Vasilka Sancin: professor, lawyer Vasilka Sancin, a Doctor of Legal Sciences, is an Assistant Professor of International Law and Director of the Institute for International Law and International Relations at the Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia where she teaches courses in the area of public international law at undergraduate and postgraduate levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Erlan Idrissov, Chairman of the Kazakhstan
    +21°C / +9°C WEDNESDAY, JULY 16, 2014 No 13 (56) www.astanatimes.com National museum of Kazakhstan opens With Government presidential Speech, international Visitors Approves General Gasification Scheme By Kulpash Konyrova duced gas – 25 billion cubic me- tres – will be used for re-injection ASTANA – “The Kazakh govern- to maintain the necessary pressure ment has approved a general scheme to extract oil from oil reservoirs, for the gasification of the country. the minister said, which is why pro- This policy document defines eco- duction volumes of usable gas will nomically sound strategic directions reach 21 billion cubic metres per to ensure reliable gas supply to con- year by 2030. sumers,” Minister of Oil and Gas “According to the forecast, in Uzakbai Karabalin said on June 24. 2030, the largest consumers of com- The new plan is intended to in- mercial gas will be industrial en- The National Museum of Kazakhstan crease gas production, consump- terprises and enterprises in the fuel Temporary exhibits of archival pho- tion and transportation, including and energy complex, [at] 31 and 40 tos and felt clothing were also among through building new pipelines, percent, respectively. Many of these the exhibitions on opening day. over the next 15 years. companies are included in the State As for the museum itself, Simp- Over the past 20 years, oil produc- Programme of Accelerated Indus- son said, “It’s very dramatic. It’s tion in Kazakhstan has more than tri- trial and Innovative Development monumental. It’s right in the mid- pled and gas production has grown (SPAIID),” said Karabalin.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Two Cities
    The four-day ‘red’ weeks in the European Parliament’s calendar above are Strasbourg weeks. The red 24-hour ‘mini-plenary’ sittings are in Brussels. A tale of two cities The political, financial, environmental and social impact of the European Parliament's 'two-seat' arrangement Report for the Brussels-Strasbourg Seat Study Group www.brusselsstrasbourgstudy.eu Chairman Edward McMillan-Scott MEP, Vice-President of the European Parliament Brussels/Strasbourg, February 2011 1 A TALE OF TWO CITIES "Il fallait aussi composer avec un problème que j'ai découvert avec stupeur: celui d'une assemblée contrainte de travailler en trois lieux différents. (…) Ce système existe depuis maintenant trente ans, coûte des fortunes, et ne soulève à peu près aucun tollé, et même aucune question. Les journalistes, pourtant friands de gaspillage financiers, demeurent curieusement muets sur la question. Si je n'accepte pas d'être taxée d'anti européanisme, je n'ai jamais dissimulé mon hostilité à cet éparpillement. Dès mon élection j'ai alerté tout le monde sur ce gâchis de temps et d'argent, réfléchi à une éventuelle utilisation des immenses locaux strasbourgeois - pourquoi ne pas y installer une université européenne, par exemple? -, mais en pure perte."1 - Simone Veil, Une Vie2. (Simone Veil was the first President of the directly elected European Parliament, from 1979 to 1982) 1 "I also had to deal with a problem I was stunned to discover: that of an assembly forced to work in three different places. (...) This system has existed for thirty years now, costs a fortune, yet it doesn't lead to an outcry, it doesn't even raise questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Guide Euroscepticism
    Information Guide Euroscepticism A guide to information sources on Euroscepticism, with hyperlinks to further sources of information within European Sources Online and on external websites Contents Introduction .................................................................................................. 2 Brief Historical Overview................................................................................. 2 Euro Crisis 2008 ............................................................................................ 3 European Elections 2014 ................................................................................ 5 Euroscepticism in Europe ................................................................................ 8 Eurosceptic organisations ......................................................................... 10 Eurosceptic thinktanks ............................................................................. 10 Transnational Eurosceptic parties and political groups .................................. 11 Eurocritical media ................................................................................... 12 EU Reaction ................................................................................................. 13 Information sources in the ESO database ........................................................ 14 Further information sources on the internet ..................................................... 14 Copyright © 2016 Cardiff EDC. All rights reserved. 1 Cardiff EDC is part of the University Library
    [Show full text]