DOCSLIB.ORG

October 21, 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Planning Commission March 5, 2018 Final Minutes Planning Commission March 5, 2018 City of Orange Monday 7:00 p.m. PRESENT: Commissioners Correa, Glasgow, Gladson and Willits ABSENT: Simpson STAFF PRESENT: Anna Pehoushek, Assistant Community Development Director Gary Sheatz, Senior Assistant City Attorney Robert Garcia, Senior Planner Marissa Moshier, Historic Preservation Planner Simonne Fannin, Recording Secretary REGULAR SESSION 1.1 CALL TO ORDER: Chair Glasgow called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 1.2 FLAG SALUTE: Chair Glasgow led the flag salute. 1.3 ROLL CALL: Commissioner Simpson absent 1.4 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: None 1.5 CONTINUED OR WITHDRAWN ITEMS: None 1.6 PLANNING MANAGER REPORTS: Anna Pehoushek, Assistant Community Development Director announced that the Council Chamber will be renovated; therefore future Planning Commission meetings will be held in the Weimer Room until further notice. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: 2.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF FEBRUARY 21, 2018. Motion was made to approve the minutes as written: MOTION: Commissioner Gladson SECOND: Commissioner Willits AYES: Commissioners Correa, Gladson, Glasgow and Willits NOES: None ABSENT: Simpson ABSTAIN: None MOTION CARRIED. 1 Planning Commission March 5, 2018 3. NEW HEARING: 3.1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 3055-17- TILTED KILT The applicant is requesting to modify certain existing conditions of approval associated with Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2929-14 related to an Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Type 47 License (On-Sale General for a Bona Fide Eating Place). LOCATION: 1625 WEST KATELLA AVENUE NOTE: The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per State Guideline Section 15301 (Class 1 – Existing Facilities) because the proposal only involves the modification of certain existing conditions of approval for the licensing of on- site sales and consumption of alcoholic beverages. There is no environmental public review required for a categorical exemption. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the proposal and take the appropriate action. The Planning Commission can take one of the following actions: . Direct staff to return with a resolution to approve one or more of the requested modifications to the existing conditions of approval with required findings and conditions. Direct staff to return with a resolution to deny the requested modifications to the existing conditions of approval with required findings. Robert Garcia, Senior Planner provided an explanation of the item consistent with the staff report. He explained the applicant is requesting modifications to Conditions 23, 26, 29 and 41, and noted that the Police Department is opposed to all of the requested modifications. Mr. Garcia also expressed Planning opposition to the modification of Condition 26 staff does support, as it has been the practice of the City to deny entrance fees for business with type 47 Licenses. The Commission and staff briefly discussed the following items: Placement and times that the portable bars would be utilized; the height of the glass walls and security of the portable bars while being used and where they would be stored when not in use. The City's history and view on cover charges. The genre and allowing up to three musicians with non-amplified music, along with a strict adherence to the cut off time. The Police Department's concerns about the request Boxing and UFC fights do not constitute a special event. 2 Planning Commission March 5, 2018 Michael Ayaz, the representative attorney of the applicant, OC Restaurant Group approached the podium. He explained the walls of the portable bars were measured from the outside because the Police Department wanted to make sure that people were not passing drinks over the wall. The bars are strategically located in order to avoid butting up the exterior walls. The portable would will only serve beer, no mixed drinks, be staffed at all times and would be used for excess flow on major events and holidays such as St. Patrick's Day. When not in use, bars would be securely stored and locked and will not have product inside of them. There would be a maximum of 24 events per year, but most likely it would be 14; the pay-per- view events are one per month with an occasional month when there may be two events. The major reason for the request to allow a cover charge is to help offset charges for the sports driven events they show on their TVs that cost them $6-$12,000 per show. These pay-per-view events are a critical component of their sports themed business. Patrons of the Tilted Kilt have an expectation that the fights or pay-per-view events will be there. He reminded the Commissioners that minors would not be asked to pay a cover. The cover charge provides safeguards; it regulates the incoming people, and helps keep out the riffraff and people who go to their establishment and sit there all night without purchasing anything because they don't want to pay for the fight at home. There have been no major crimes in this area and the Tilted Kilt has been a responsible operator with no violations or overt calls for service. There is no nexus between fight night and criminal activity. After speaking with the Police Department about the cover charge, they developed suggested language to make the condition very specific; the requested language states they would only be allowed to charge a cover once or twice a month if the restaurant has to pay to view the event on their TVs. There are other establishments in the City that are illegally charging covers and they have done extensive research on other establishments in the City that have a cover charge. If Lucky Strike is allowed to have a cover charge because they provide a two week notice to the Police Department, then Tilted Kilt should be given the same opportunity and consideration. They would entertain the same noticing process in order to collect a cover. The State has no limitation for any type 47 License that prohibits a cover charge. The Stadium Promenade Center is an entertainment destination and The Tilted Kilt would like to provide 1 to 3 musicians for ambient sound on the weekends; there would be no dancing. They would operate under the noise ordinance and know they can be cited for violations. The City can always pull the CUP if they are in violation. They would make sure the time restrictions are strictly adhere to. They have a good relationship with other uses in the Center who are all supportive of the request. He asked the Commission to consider giving them a one-year trial period. The Commissioners voiced some of their concerns and opinions: Sound from patio music could possibly disrupt other local businesses and the planned apartment complex that will be built in the future. Providing pay-per-view events is a business decision and the Restaurant should be able to absorb the cost. Pay-per-view attract a different kind of crowd. 3 Planning Commission March 5, 2018 Perhaps the City could allow no more than one event per month with a six-month review. The Resolution and conditions of approval should be fine-tuned in order for the proposed changes to be acceptable. A not to exceed amount needs to be determined for the cover charge. Commissioner Willits stated he conducted a site review and was pleasantly surprised to find a higher caliber clientele, and neat and clean facility. He does not have any problems with the requested changes to the conditions and thinks it's time to look at updating City expectations. He agrees with the six- month timeframe and supports the request. Commissioner Glasgow is supportive of one to three non-amplified musicians on Friday Saturday and Sunday; Thursday night should be cut out unless it is a holiday. He understands the business would like to recoup some of its outlay; however he doesn't think the cover would reduce the number of clientele who just go to watch the fight without a purchase. He is supportive of the two week notice to the Police Department for larger events in order to allow the Police Department to step up enforcement if needed. Commissioner Gladson stated she would like to see the revised language of the conditions and she directed staff to bring back a final resolution and conditions for the Commission's approval. Gary Sheatz, Senior Assistant City Attorney, explained that Lucky Strike obtained approval of special events with two week advance notice to the Police Department in order to provide the Department time to prepare for the additional enforcement that may be needed. He stated that, Condition 5 of the Tilted Kilt proposed Resolution places a one-year review on the Conditional Use Permit; however, the Commission has the latitude to impose a six-month review if they choose to do so. Rick Blake, attorney and partner of Mr.Ayaz spent 10 years with the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. He stated that it is evident that when fights are televised at the restaurant, people come in, sit and nurse a beverage throughout the entire fight and take up space that a paying customer would use. The cover is not a money making proposition; it is designed to help offset the costs. Tilted Kilt is a public eating establishment with a Type 47 License which allows for the purchase of alcohol with or without food. Lieut. Dennis Gomez, Orange Police Department, stated the Police Department is not opposed to the having a solo, non-amplified performer on the patio consistent with the other establishments in the Stadium Promenade Center.
Recommended publications
  • Consent Decree: Safeway, Inc. (PDF)

    Consent Decree: Safeway, Inc. (PDF)

    1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 5 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 7 ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. 8 ) v. ) 9 ) SAFEWAY INC., ) 10 ) Defendant. ) 11 ) 12 13 14 CONSENT DECREE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Consent Decree 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 I. JURISDICTION, VENUE, AND NOTICE .............................................................2 4 II. APPLICABILITY....................................................................................................2 5 III. OBJECTIVES ..........................................................................................................3 6 IV. DEFINITIONS.........................................................................................................3 7 V. CIVIL PENALTIES.................................................................................................6 8 9 VI. COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................6 10 A. Refrigerant Compliance Management System ............................................6 11 B. Corporate-Wide Leak Rate Reduction .........................................................7 12 C. Emissions Reductions at Highest-Emission Stores......................................8 13 VII. PARTICIPATION IN RECOGNITION PROGRAMS .........................................10 14 VIII. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS .........................................................................10 15 IX. STIPULATED PENALTIES .................................................................................12
  • Western Weekly Reports

    Western Weekly Reports

    WESTERN WEEKLY REPORTS Reports of Cases Decided in the Courts of Western Canada and Certain Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada 2013-VOLUME 12 (Cited [2013] 12 W.W.R.) All cases of value from the courts of Western Canada and appeals therefrom to the Supreme Court of Canada SELECTION EDITOR Walter J. Watson, B.A., LL.B. ASSOCIATE EDITORS (Alberta) E. Mirth, Q.C. (British Columbia) Darrell E. Burns, LL.B., LL.M. (Manitoba) E. Arthur Braid, Q.C. (Saskatchewan) G.L. Gerrand, Q.C. CARSWELL EDITORIAL STAFF Cheryl L. McPherson, B.A.(HONS.) Director, Primary Content Operations Audrey Wineberg, B.A.(HONS.), LL.B. Product Development Manager Nicole Ross, B.A., LL.B. Supervisor, Legal Writing Andrea Andrulis, B.A., LL.B., LL.M. (Acting) Supervisor, Legal Writing Andrew Pignataro, B.A.(HONS.) Content Editor WESTERN WEEKLY REPORTS is published 48 times per year. Subscrip- Western Weekly Reports est publi´e 48 fois par ann´ee. L’abonnement est de tion rate $409.00 per bound volume including parts. Indexed: Carswell’s In- 409 $ par volume reli´e incluant les fascicules. Indexation: Index a` la docu- dex to Canadian Legal Literature. mentation juridique au Canada de Carswell. Editorial Offices are also located at the following address: 430 rue St. Pierre, Le bureau de la r´edaction est situ´e a` Montr´eal — 430, rue St. Pierre, Mon- Montr´eal, Qu´ebec, H2Y 2M5. tr´eal, Qu´ebec, H2Y 2M5. ________ ________ © 2013 Thomson Reuters Canada Limited © 2013 Thomson Reuters Canada Limit´ee NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER: All rights reserved.
  • MHP and DMC-ODS Beneficiary Policy Number: 3224 Grievance and Appeal Process

    MHP and DMC-ODS Beneficiary Policy Number: 3224 Grievance and Appeal Process

    SANTA CRUZ COUNTY Behavioral Health Services POLICIES AND PROCEDURE MANUAL Subject: MHP and DMC-ODS Beneficiary Policy Number: 3224 Grievance and Appeal Process 9 Date Effective: 4/26/2021 Pages: 7 Prior Version: 12/01/2020 Responsible for Updating: Quality Improvement Staff Approval: ___________________________ __________________________ Behavioral Health Director Date BACKGROUND: Santa Cruz County Behavioral Health Services [Mental Health Plan (MHP) and Drug Medi-Cal Organized Delivery System (DMC-ODS)] is committed to respecting and protecting a person’s right to express service dissatisfaction, and to reviewing each notification as a means to support quality behavioral health care. We adhere to federal and state requirements for processing beneficiary grievances and appeals. SCOPE: Providers who render MHP and/or DMC-ODS Network services shall adhere to this policy to ensure beneficiaries are informed of their grievance and appeal rights and have access to methods for filing a grievance and appeal with County Quality Improvement. PURPOSES: To provide beneficiaries and providers with clear, viable procedures for the resolution of grievances and appeals. POLICY: Santa Cruz County Behavioral Health Services shall provide all Medi-Cal beneficiaries with information, in both English and Spanish, regarding grievance and appeal procedures. Beneficiaries shall have access to these grievance and appeal procedures in accordance with state and federal mandates, as described in this policy. Information regarding the process for filing grievances and appeals is available as brochure forms, and also in the Mental Health Plan (MHP) Beneficiary Handbook for Specialty Mental Health Services and the Drug Medi-Cal Organized Delivery System (DMC-ODS) Beneficiary Handbook. 3224: Grievance and Appeal Process (MHP & DMC) 1 DEFINITIONS: 1.
  • Drb Final Resolution

    Drb Final Resolution

    COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATION SECTION 105 DISPUTE REVIEW BOARD Brannan Sand and Gravel Co. v. Colorado Department of Transportation DRB FINAL RESOLUTION BACKGROUND Colorado Project No. STA 0404-044 15821R, “Removing Asphalt Mat on West Colfax Avenue and Replacing with a new Hot Mix Asphalt Overlay”, was awarded to Brannan Sand and Gravel Company on August 11, 2008, for $1,089,047.93. The contract incorporated all Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Standard Specifications and Project Special Conditions, including, Standard Specification 109.06: Standard Specification 109.06 Partial Payments. CDOT will make partial payments to the Contractor once each month as the work progresses, when the Contractor is performing satisfactorily under the Contract. Payments will be based upon progress estimates prepared by the Engineer, of the value of work performed, materials placed in accordance with the Contract, and the value of the materials on hand in accordance with the Contract. Revision of Section 109. In September 2006, CDOT, CCA (Colorado Contractors Associations), and CAPA (Colorado Asphalt Pavement Association) formed a joint Task Force at the request of CAPA to evaluate the need for an asphalt cement cost adjustment specification that would be similar to the Fuel Cost Adjustment that was currently being used by CDOT. The result of the Task Force effort was the revision of Standard Specification 109.06 to include the Asphalt Cement Cost Adjustments Subsection. Subsection 109.06, Revision of Section 109, “Asphalt Cement Cost Adjustment When Asphalt Cement is Included in the Bid Price for HMA”, states: _____________________________________________________________ DRB Final Resolution Brannan Sand & Gravel v.
  • Procedural Items for the Cmfa Summary and Recommendations ______

    Procedural Items for the Cmfa Summary and Recommendations ______

    PROCEDURAL ITEMS FOR THE CMFA SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS _____________________________________________________________ Items: A1, A2, A3 Action: Pursuant to the by-laws and procedures of CMFA, each meeting starts with the call to order and roll call (A1) and proceeds to a review and approval of the minutes from the prior meeting (A2). After the minutes have been reviewed and approved, time is set aside to allow for comments from the public (A3). _____________________________________________________________ NEW ROADS SCHOOL SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS _____________________________________________________________ Applicant: New Roads School Action: Final Resolution Amount: $3,250,000 Purpose: Finance and Refinance the Acquisition, Construction, Improvement, Renovation and Equipping of Educational Facilities, Located in the City of Santa Monica, California. Activity: Private School Meeting: June 7, 2013 Background: New Roads School (“New Roads”) was established in 1995 as a model for education in an ethnically, racially, culturally, and socio-economically diverse community. New Roads began as a middle school program with 70 students and has grown in both directions each year thereafter. New Roads now serves over 600 students representing the kaleidoscope of communities that make up Los Angeles. Unique among independent schools, no less that 40% of the New Roads School tuition budget is devoted to need-based financial aid every year, enabling them to provide financial assistance to more than 50% of their families. Over the past 15 years, New Roads has dedicated approximately $60 million to financial aid. New Roads School seeks to spark enduring curiosity, to promote personal, social, political, cultural and moral understanding, to instill respect for the life and ecology of the earth, and to foster the sensitivity to embrace life’s deep joys and mysteries.
  • Pharmacy Support Person Registration of Respondent

    Pharmacy Support Person Registration of Respondent

    BEFORE THE IOWA BOARD OF PHARMACY Re: Case No. 2011-172 Pharmacy Support Person Registration of STATEMENT OF CHARGES TYLERANTHONY SMITH Registration No. 792, Respondent COMES NOW, the Complainant, Lloyd K. Jessen, and states: 1. He is the Executive Director ofthe Iowa Board ofPharmacy and files this Statement ofCharges solely in his official capacity. 2. The Board has jurisdiction in this matter pursuant to Iowa Code Chapters 147,155A and 272C (2011). 3. The Board issued Tyler Anthony Smith (hereinafter, "Respondent") pharmacy support person registration number 792, subject to the laws of the State ofIowa and the rules ofthe Board. Respondent's registration was last renewed on July 12, 2010, and will expire on June 30, 2012. 4. At all times material to this Statement ofCharges, Respondent was employed as a pharmacy support person at Hy-Vee Pharmacy, Perry, Iowa. A. CHARGES COUNT I- UNLAWFUL POSSESSION AND DISTRIBUTION OF DRUGS Respondent is charged pursuant to Iowa Code §§ 124.403, i55A.6B(s) and 155A.21 (2011), and 657 Iowa Administrative Code § 36.i(4)(h), with possession and distribution of a prescription drugs - specifically, controlled substances - for other than lawful purposes. COUNT II - VIOLATING LAWS RELATED TO PHARMACY Respondent is charged pursuant to Iowa Code § 155A.6B(5) (2011) and 657 Iowa Administrative Code § 36.i(4)(j) with violating state laws related to the practice of pharmacy; specifically, laws relating to possession and distribution ofcontrolled substances found at Iowa Code §§ 124.403,155A.21 and 155A.23 (2011). COUNT III - INABILITY TO PRACTICE DUE TO CHEMICAL ABUSE Respondent is charged pursuant to Iowa Code § i55A.6B(s) (2011), and 657 Iowa Administrative Code § 36.1(4X111) with the inability to practice as a pharmacy support person, with reasonable skill and safety, due to chemical abuse.
  • CITY of VANCOUVER RESOLUTION July 7, 2008

    CITY of VANCOUVER RESOLUTION July 7, 2008

    CITY OF VANCOUVER RESOLUTION July 7, 2008 RESOLUTION NO. fl-&ha A RESOLUTION relating to selection of a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) for the Columbia River Crossing project (CRC), adauthorizing action by the City of Vancouver's delegates to the C-TRAN Board and Regional Transportation Council Board, guided by the principles herein, in support of a regional LPA. WHEREAS, Interstate 5 is a conidor of national significance that serves the entire west coast of the United States, as well as international commerce with Canada, Mexico, and all of the countries of the Pacific Rim that access US west coast sea ports; and WHEREAS, Interstate 5 between Portland, Oregon and Vancouver, Washington experiences some of the worst congestion along the entire length of the Interstate 5 corridor; and WHEREAS, the 1-5 Interstate Bridge is one of only two Columbia River crossings between Vancouver, Washington and Portland, Oregon and approximately 138,000 people rely on crossing the 1-5 Bridge daily by car, transit, bicycle and on foot; and WHEREAS, the Vancouver-Portland Metropolitan Area is expected to grow by one million new residents by the year 2030; and WHEREAS, the existing 1-5 bridges ate old and do not meet current seismic hazard avoidance standards; and WHEREAS, the 1-5 Transportation and Trade Partnership Final Strategic Plan recommended congestion and mobility improvements within the 1-5 Bridge Influence Area in 2002; and WHEREAS, the Governors of Oregon and Washington initiated the Columbia River Crossing Project (CRC) and appointed a 39
  • Armed Conflicts Report - Israel

    Armed Conflicts Report - Israel

    Armed Conflicts Report - Israel Armed Conflicts Report Israel-Palestine (1948 - first combat deaths) Update: February 2009 Summary Type of Conflict Parties to the Conflict Status of the Fighting Number of Deaths Political Developments Background Arms Sources Economic Factors Summary: 2008 The situation in the Gaza strip escalated throughout 2008 to reflect an increasing humanitarian crisis. The death toll reached approximately 1800 deaths by the end of January 2009, with increased conflict taking place after December 19th. The first six months of 2008 saw increased fighting between Israeli forces and Hamas rebels. A six month ceasefire was agreed upon in June of 2008, and the summer months saw increased factional violence between opposing Palestinian groups Hamas and Fatah. Israel shut down the border crossings between the Gaza strip and Israel and shut off fuel to the power plant mid-January 2008. The fuel was eventually turned on although blackouts occurred sporadically throughout the year. The blockade was opened periodically throughout the year to allow a minimum amount of humanitarian aid to pass through. However, for the majority of the year, the 1.5 million Gaza Strip inhabitants, including those needing medical aid, were trapped with few resources. At the end of January 2009, Israel agreed to the principles of a ceasefire proposal, but it is unknown whether or not both sides can come to agreeable terms and create long lasting peace in 2009. 2007 A November 2006 ceasefire was broken when opposing Palestinian groups Hamas and Fatah renewed fighting in April and May of 2007. In June, Hamas led a coup on the Gaza headquarters of Fatah giving them control of the Gaza Strip.
  • When Can I Confirm an Arbitration Award?

    When Can I Confirm an Arbitration Award?

    When Can I Confirm an Arbitration Award? June 01, 2021 Timeline to Confirm Arbitration Award BST Ohio Corp. v. Wolgang, 2021-Ohio-1785 In this appeal, the Supreme Court of Ohio reversed the lower court’s decision, holding that neither R.C. 2711.09 nor R.C. 2711.13 requires a court to wait three months after an arbitration award is issued before confirming the award. The Bullet Point: In this matter, the Supreme Court of Ohio determined that trial courts need not wait three months before confirming an arbitration award. In making this determination, the Court analyzed the interplay of the timing requirements of R.C. 2711.09 and 2711.13. Under R.C. 2711.09, a party may file an application to confirm an arbitration award with a court of common pleas within one year after the award is issued. Thereafter, the court must grant an order and issue judgment confirming said award unless it has been vacated, modified, or corrected pursuant to R.C. 2711.10 and 2711.11. As compared to said one-year limit to confirm, R.C. 2711.13 mandates that a party seeking to alter the results of arbitration must move to vacate, modify, or correct the award within three months of the award being issued. In this case, the plaintiff applied to the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court (the “trial court”) to confirm the arbitration award the same day it was issued. The following day, the defendant filed a petition to vacate or correct the award in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.
  • Official Proceedings of the Meetings of the Board Of

    Official Proceedings of the Meetings of the Board Of

    OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF PORTAGE COUNTY, WISCONSIN January 18, 2005 February 15, 2005 March 15, 2005 April 19, 2005 May 17, 2005 June 29, 2005 July 19, 2005 August 16,2005 September 21,2005 October 18, 2005 November 8, 2005 December 20, 2005 O. Philip Idsvoog, Chair Richard Purcell, First Vice-Chair Dwight Stevens, Second Vice-Chair Roger Wrycza, County Clerk ATTACHED IS THE PORTAGE COUNTY BOARD PROCEEDINGS FOR 2005 WHICH INCLUDE MINUTES AND RESOLUTIONS ATTACHMENTS THAT ARE LISTED FOR RESOLUTIONS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICE RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION TITLE JANUARY 18, 2005 77-2004-2006 ZONING ORDINANCE MAP AMENDMENT, CRUEGER PROPERTY 78-2004-2006 ZONING ORDINANCE MAP AMENDMENT, TURNER PROPERTY 79-2004-2006 HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NEW POSITION REQUEST FOR 2005-NON TAX LEVY FUNDED-PUBLIC HEALTH PLANNER (ADDITIONAL 20 HOURS/WEEK) 80-2004-2006 DIRECT LEGISLATION REFERENDUM ON CREATING THE OFFICE OF COUNTY EXECUTIVE 81-2004-2006 ADVISORY REFERENDUM QUESTIONS DEALING WITH FULL STATE FUNDING FOR MANDATED STATE PROGRAMS REQUESTED BY WISCONSIN COUNTIES ASSOCIATION 82-2004-2006 SUBCOMMITTEE TO REVIEW AMBULANCE SERVICE AMENDED AGREEMENT ISSUES 83-2004-2006 MANAGEMENT REVIEW PROCESS TO IDENTIFY THE FUTURE DIRECTION TECHNICAL FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION OF PORTAGE COUNTY AMENDMENT GOVERNMENT 84-2004-2006 FINAL RESOLUTION FEBRUARY 15, 2005 85-2004-2006 ZONING ORDINANCE MAP AMENDMENT, WANTA PROPERTY 86-2004-2006 AUTHORIZING, APPROVING AND RATIFYING A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT INCLUDING GROUND
  • Official Proceedings of the Meetings of the Board Of

    Official Proceedings of the Meetings of the Board Of

    OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF PORTAGE COUNTY, WISCONSIN January 27, 2003 February 10, 2003 March 18, 2003 April 15, 2003 May 12, 2003 May 20, 2003 June 17, 2003 June 26, 2003 July 29, 2003 August 19, 2003 September 23, 2003 October 21, 2003 November 12, 2003 December 16, 2003 Clarence Hintz, Chair O. Philip Idsvoog, First Vice-Chair Richard M. Purcell, Second Vice-Chair Roger Wrycza, County Clerk ATTACHED ARE THE PORTAGE COUNTY BOARD PROCEEDINGS FOR 2003 WHICH INCLUDE MINUTES AND RESOLUTIONS ATTACHMENTS THAT ARE LISTED FOR RESOLUTIONS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICE RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION TITLE JANUARY 27, 2003 73-2002-2004 APPROVE A COMPREHENSIVE INTERGOVERNMENTAL SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT WITH MARATHON AND SHAWANO COUNTIES 74-2002-2004 ZONING ORDINANCE MAP AMENDMENT, MATHY CONSTRUCTION CO./AMERICAN ASPHALT OF WISCONSIN PROPERTY 75-2002-2004 ZONING ORDINANCE MAP AMENDMENT, BORGEN PROPERTY 76-2002-2004 FINAL RESOLUTION FEBRUARY 10, 2003 78-2002-2004 APPROVAL TO ENTER INTO FOUR YEAR LEASE/PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH AMENDED CISCO SYSTEMS FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE COUNTY WIDE PHONE SYSTEM 79-2002-2004 RENEWAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION SELF INSURANCE FUND 80-2002-2004 FINAL RESOLUTION MARCH 18, 2003 81-2002-2004 ZONING ORDINANCE MAP AMENDMENT – NICHOLAS L. ZYWICKI, OWNER, (ALLEN OMERNIK, PREVIOUS OWNER) PROPERTY 82-2002-2004 AUTHORIZING AND FUNDING A COMPREHENSIVE LONG RANGE FACILITIES PLAN AMENDED AND EXPANSION STUDY 83-2002-2004 REQUESTING WAIVER FROM THE STATE MANDATE
  • Final Resolution and Order Vs

    Final Resolution and Order Vs

    COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO PUERTO RICO ENERGY COMMISSION MARC BEJARANO CASE NO.: CEPR-RV-2017-0004 PETITIONER SUBJECT: FinAl Resolution And Order vs. AUTORIDAD DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA DE PUERTO RICO RESPONDENT FINAL RESOLUTION AND ORDER I. Brief ProcedurAl BAckground On February 27, 2017, Marc Bejarano (“Petitioner” or “Mr. Bejarano”) filed a petition for bill review before the Puerto Energy Commission (“Commission”) pursuAnt to Article 6.27 of Act 57-20141 and Regulation 8863.2 Mr. Bejarano’s petition relates to a past due charge included in A bill dated October 28, 2016 issued by the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) to Ms. Wendy CArroll PArker. On MArch 17, 2017, PREPA AppeAred before the Commission And requested an extension until April 10, 2017 to reply to Mr. BejArAno’s petition. The Commission grAnted PREPA’s request on MArch 20, 2017. On April 4, 2017, Mr. BejArAno filed A Motion requesting thAt the heAring in this case be conducted in the English language. The Commission grAnted the Petitioner’s request on April 5, 2017, pursuant to Section 1.10 of Regulation 8543.3 On April 10, 2017, PREPA filed A motion requesting the dismissAl of Mr. BejArAno’s petition. On April 19, 2017, the Commission held A hearing to Address: (1) whether it has jurisdiction to consider the dispute of the past due charges contested by the Petitioner; (2) whether there Are grounds to consider the present cAse As A complAint rAther thAn A petition for bill review, given PREPA having allegedly transferred the past due balance to the 1 The Puerto Rico Energy TrAnsformAtion And RELIEF Act, As Amended.