The Seckel Syndrome and Centrosomal Protein Ninein

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Seckel Syndrome and Centrosomal Protein Ninein M BoC | ARTICLE The Seckel syndrome and centrosomal protein Ninein localizes asymmetrically to stem cell centrosomes but is not required for normal development, behavior, or DNA damage response in Drosophila Yiming Zhenga,†, Vito Mennellab,c,†, Steven Marksa, Jill Wildongerd, Esraa Elnagdib,c, David A. Agarde, and Timothy L. Megrawa,* aDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4300; bDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5G 0A4, Canada; cCell Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, M5G 1X8, Canada; dDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706; eThe Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-2240 ABSTRACT Ninein (Nin) is a centrosomal protein whose gene is mutated in Seckel syndrome Monitoring Editor (SCKL, MIM 210600), an inherited recessive disease that results in primordial dwarfism, cog- Yukiko Yamashita nitive deficiencies, and increased sensitivity to genotoxic stress. Nin regulates neural stem University of Michigan cell self-renewal, interkinetic nuclear migration, and microtubule assembly in mammals. Nin is Received: Sep 16, 2015 evolutionarily conserved, yet its role in cell division and development has not been investi- Revised: Mar 18, 2016 gated in a model organism. Here we characterize the single Nin orthologue in Drosophila. Accepted: Mar 28, 2016 Drosophila Nin localizes to the periphery of the centrosome but not at centriolar structures as in mammals. However, Nin shares the property of its mammalian orthologue of promoting microtubule assembly. In neural and germline stem cells, Nin localizes asymmetrically to the younger (daughter) centrosome, yet it is not required for the asymmetric division of stem cells. In wing epithelia and muscle, Nin localizes to noncentrosomal microtubule-organizing centers. Surprisingly, loss of nin expression from a nin mutant does not significantly affect embryonic and brain development, fertility, or locomotor performance of mutant flies or their survival upon exposure to DNA-damaging agents. Although it is not essential, our data sug- gest that Nin plays a supportive role in centrosomal and extracentrosomal microtubule orga- nization and asymmetric stem cell division. This article was published online ahead of print in MBoC in Press (http://www INTRODUCTION .molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E15-09-0655) on April 6, 2016. Microcephalic primordial dwarfism (PD) is a spectrum of inherited †These authors contributed equally to this work. The authors declare no competing interests. recessive developmental disorders that cause fetal growth failure *Address correspondence to: Tim Megraw ([email protected]). resulting in severe dwarfism, microcephaly, and cognitive deficien- Abbreviations used: Cnn, centrosomin; GSC, germline stem cell; Mira, Miranda; cies (Majewski and Goecke, 1982; Klingseisen and Jackson, 2011; MTOC, microtubule-organizing center; NB, neuroblast; Nin, Ninein; PCM, Megraw et al., 2011; Chavali et al., 2014). The most prevalent PD pericentriolar material. disorders include Seckel syndrome, microcephalic osteodysplastic © 2016 Zheng, Mennella, et al. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). Two months after publication it PD (MOPD) types I and II, and Meier–Gorlin syndrome. Mutations of is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 at least 14 genes have been associated with PD disorders (Chavali Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by -nc-sa/3.0). et al., 2014). The genes identified for Seckel syndrome encode “ASCB®,” “The American Society for Cell Biology®,” and “Molecular Biology of proteins that are fundamental to centrosome function (NIN, the Cell®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. CEP63, CENPJ/CPAP/SAS-4, and CEP152; Al-Dosari et al., 2010; Supplemental Material can be found at: 1740 | Y. Zheng, V. Mennella, et al. http://www.molbiolcell.org/content/suppl/2016/04/03/mbc.E15-09-0655v1.DC1 Molecular Biology of the Cell Kalay et al., 2011; Sir et al., 2011; Dauber et al., 2012) and the DNA RESULTS damage response (ATR, ATR-interacting protein [ATRIP], DNA2, and A single Nin-family orthologue in Drosophila RBBP8/CTIP; O’Driscoll et al., 2003; Qvist et al., 2011; Ogi et al., To identify putative members of the Nin family in Drosophila, we 2012; Shaheen et al., 2014). However, whether the functions of all of performed a sequence alignment search using the National Center these genes are integrated into a common pathway responsible for for Biotechnology Information PSI-BLAST program with the N- Seckel syndrome is unclear (Arquint et al., 2014; Chavali et al., 2014; terminal region of human Nin as a query. This portion of Nin protein Antonczak et al., 2016). sequence contains two regions conserved in the Nin family in mam- The centrosome is the major microtubule-organizing center mals, and it was shown to associate with components of the γTurc (MTOC) in most animal cells. It is composed of a pair of centri- complex by immunoprecipitation (Casenghi et al., 2003; Delgehyr oles (a mother and its daughter), which organize a supramolecu- et al., 2005). In contrast to the rest of the Ninein primary sequence, lar protein assembly (Mennella et al., 2014; Woodruff et al., the N-terminal domain is also not predicted to be coiled-coil and is 2014), the pericentriolar material (PCM), where microtubule as- therefore more likely to be conserved throughout evolution. This sembly and anchoring is regulated. During late mitosis, the pair analysis identified the gene Bsg25D (CG14025) as the putative of centrioles inherited by each cell mature, allowing them to as- member of the ninein family in Drosophila (Figure 1). Subsequent semble PCM and become centrosomes. Then, after centriole du- phylogenetic analysis revealed that lower metazoan species possess plication in S phase, only the mother centriole is largely respon- a single nin ancestor gene that might have duplicated in the phylum sible for organizing the PCM at mitotic centrosomes (Wang et al., Chordata. In addition to the apparent homology ascertained from 2011). Although the centrosome is dispensable for proper cell sequence similarity, we also found Nin associated with other centro- division (Megraw et al., 1999; Khodjakov et al., 2000; Lecland some proteins (Gopalakrishnan et al., 2011). et al., 2013) and even for most of Drosophila development (Megraw et al., 2001; Basto et al., 2006; Debec et al., 2010), Nin can assemble microtubule-organizing centers mutations in the core centrosome machinery result in a spectrum To test whether Drosophila Nin shares the microtubule anchoring of diseases that cause primordial dwarfisms and impairment of and nucleation function of vertebrate Nin, we expressed Nin–green brain development (microcephaly; Megraw et al., 2011; Chavali fluorescent protein (GFP) in S2 cells, a Drosophila cell line of em- et al., 2015). NIN was recently identified as one of the genes that bryonic origin. For this and all experiments in which a nin transgene cause Seckel syndrome when mutated (Dauber et al., 2012). was expressed, the protein encoded by the nin-RB isoform was However, despite its importance to human health and mamma- used (see Figure 6A later in this paper and Materials and Methods). lian brain development, the functions of Ninein (Nin) at the In the majority of S2 cells, Nin accumulated in large cytoplasmic developmental, cellular, and molecular levels are not clearly assemblies and occasionally clustered in the proximity of the defined. plasma membrane. The Nin-GFP foci in S2 cells were sufficient to In mammals, Nin is enriched around the centriole wall and at establish a partial reorganization of the microtubule cytoskeleton the subdistal appendages, structures present only on the mother into a polarized microtubule array (Figure 2A and Supplemental centriole (Ou et al., 2002), which can anchor microtubules to Figure S1A). This is remarkable, considering that in interphase S2 the centrosome (Delgehyr et al., 2005). Nin and its paralogue cells, centrosomes normally do not act as major microtubule-orga- in vertebrates, Ninein-like protein (Nlp), are γ-tubulin complex– nizing centers and microtubules are nucleated from many regions associated proteins that regulate microtubule nucleation and in the cytoplasm, including Golgi membrane (Rogers et al., 2008). anchoring at centrosomes and noncentrosomal MTOCs Nin structures were not associated with Golgi markers, as shown by (Mogensen et al., 2000; Casenghi et al., 2003; Delgehyr et al., costaining with dGMAP, and do not appear to induce Golgi disper- 2005). sal, in contrast to mammalian cells (Casenghi et al., 2005; Figure In mouse embryonic neural progenitor cells, the older (mother) 2A). Nin colocalized partially with centrosomin (Cnn), a component centrosome is inherited by the self-renewing stem cells at each of the PCM, but was more concentrated in the space surrounding asymmetric division (Wang et al., 2009). RNA interference (RNAi)– the PCM (Figure 3, B and C). mediated Nin knockdown in embryonic mouse brains in utero dis- To better understand the mechanism of microtubule organiza- rupted asymmetric segregation of mother and daughter centro- tion by Nin, we observed individual microtubule nucleation events somes and also reduced the number of radial glia
Recommended publications
  • Title a New Centrosomal Protein Regulates Neurogenesis By
    Title A new centrosomal protein regulates neurogenesis by microtubule organization Authors: Germán Camargo Ortega1-3†, Sven Falk1,2†, Pia A. Johansson1,2†, Elise Peyre4, Sanjeeb Kumar Sahu5, Loïc Broic4, Camino De Juan Romero6, Kalina Draganova1,2, Stanislav Vinopal7, Kaviya Chinnappa1‡, Anna Gavranovic1, Tugay Karakaya1, Juliane Merl-Pham8, Arie Geerlof9, Regina Feederle10,11, Wei Shao12,13, Song-Hai Shi12,13, Stefanie M. Hauck8, Frank Bradke7, Victor Borrell6, Vijay K. Tiwari§, Wieland B. Huttner14, Michaela Wilsch- Bräuninger14, Laurent Nguyen4 and Magdalena Götz1,2,11* Affiliations: 1. Institute of Stem Cell Research, Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany. 2. Physiological Genomics, Biomedical Center, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Germany. 3. Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences, Biocenter, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Germany. 4. GIGA-Neurosciences, Molecular regulation of neurogenesis, University of Liège, Belgium 5. Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany. 6. Instituto de Neurociencias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas and Universidad Miguel Hernández, Sant Joan d’Alacant, Spain. 7. Laboratory for Axon Growth and Regeneration, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany. 8. Research Unit Protein Science, Helmholtz Centre Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany. 9. Protein Expression and Purification Facility, Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany. 10. Institute for Diabetes and Obesity, Monoclonal Antibody Core Facility, Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany. 11. SYNERGY, Excellence Cluster of Systems Neurology, Biomedical Center, Ludwig- Maximilian University Munich, Germany. 12. Developmental Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA 13.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Par6c Is at the Mother Centriole and Controls Centrosomal Protein
    860 Research Article Par6c is at the mother centriole and controls centrosomal protein composition through a Par6a-dependent pathway Vale´rian Dormoy, Kati Tormanen and Christine Su¨ tterlin* Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-2300, USA *Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Accepted 3 December 2012 Journal of Cell Science 126, 860–870 ß 2013. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd doi: 10.1242/jcs.121186 Summary The centrosome contains two centrioles that differ in age, protein composition and function. This non-membrane bound organelle is known to regulate microtubule organization in dividing cells and ciliogenesis in quiescent cells. These specific roles depend on protein appendages at the older, or mother, centriole. In this study, we identified the polarity protein partitioning defective 6 homolog gamma (Par6c) as a novel component of the mother centriole. This specific localization required the Par6c C-terminus, but was independent of intact microtubules, the dynein/dynactin complex and the components of the PAR polarity complex. Par6c depletion resulted in altered centrosomal protein composition, with the loss of a large number of proteins, including Par6a and p150Glued, from the centrosome. As a consequence, there were defects in ciliogenesis, microtubule organization and centrosome reorientation during migration. Par6c interacted with Par3 and aPKC, but these proteins were not required for the regulation of centrosomal protein composition. Par6c also associated with Par6a, which controls protein recruitment to the centrosome through p150Glued. Our study is the first to identify Par6c as a component of the mother centriole and to report a role of a mother centriole protein in the regulation of centrosomal protein composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Information Proximity Interactions Among Centrosome
    Current Biology, Volume 24 Supplemental Information Proximity Interactions among Centrosome Components Identify Regulators of Centriole Duplication Elif Nur Firat-Karalar, Navin Rauniyar, John R. Yates III, and Tim Stearns Figure S1 A Myc Streptavidin -tubulin Merge Myc Streptavidin -tubulin Merge BirA*-PLK4 BirA*-CEP63 BirA*- CEP192 BirA*- CEP152 - BirA*-CCDC67 BirA* CEP152 CPAP BirA*- B C Streptavidin PCM1 Merge Myc-BirA* -CEP63 PCM1 -tubulin Merge BirA*- CEP63 DMSO - BirA* CEP63 nocodazole BirA*- CCDC67 Figure S2 A GFP – + – + GFP-CEP152 + – + – Myc-CDK5RAP2 + + + + (225 kDa) Myc-CDK5RAP2 (216 kDa) GFP-CEP152 (27 kDa) GFP Input (5%) IP: GFP B GFP-CEP152 truncation proteins Inputs (5%) IP: GFP kDa 1-7481-10441-1290218-1654749-16541045-16541-7481-10441-1290218-1654749-16541045-1654 250- Myc-CDK5RAP2 150- 150- 100- 75- GFP-CEP152 Figure S3 A B CEP63 – – + – – + GFP CCDC14 KIAA0753 Centrosome + – – + – – GFP-CCDC14 CEP152 binding binding binding targeting – + – – + – GFP-KIAA0753 GFP-KIAA0753 (140 kDa) 1-496 N M C 150- 100- GFP-CCDC14 (115 kDa) 1-424 N M – 136-496 M C – 50- CEP63 (63 kDa) 1-135 N – 37- GFP (27 kDa) 136-424 M – kDa 425-496 C – – Inputs (2%) IP: GFP C GFP-CEP63 truncation proteins D GFP-CEP63 truncation proteins Inputs (5%) IP: GFP Inputs (5%) IP: GFP kDa kDa 1-135136-424425-4961-424136-496FL Ctl 1-135136-424425-4961-424136-496FL Ctl 1-135136-424425-4961-424136-496FL Ctl 1-135136-424425-4961-424136-496FL Ctl Myc- 150- Myc- 100- CCDC14 KIAA0753 100- 100- 75- 75- GFP- GFP- 50- CEP63 50- CEP63 37- 37- Figure S4 A siCtl
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Information
    Supplemental information Dissection of the genomic structure of the miR-183/96/182 gene. Previously, we showed that the miR-183/96/182 cluster is an intergenic miRNA cluster, located in a ~60-kb interval between the genes encoding nuclear respiratory factor-1 (Nrf1) and ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2H (Ube2h) on mouse chr6qA3.3 (1). To start to uncover the genomic structure of the miR- 183/96/182 gene, we first studied genomic features around miR-183/96/182 in the UCSC genome browser (http://genome.UCSC.edu/), and identified two CpG islands 3.4-6.5 kb 5’ of pre-miR-183, the most 5’ miRNA of the cluster (Fig. 1A; Fig. S1 and Seq. S1). A cDNA clone, AK044220, located at 3.2-4.6 kb 5’ to pre-miR-183, encompasses the second CpG island (Fig. 1A; Fig. S1). We hypothesized that this cDNA clone was derived from 5’ exon(s) of the primary transcript of the miR-183/96/182 gene, as CpG islands are often associated with promoters (2). Supporting this hypothesis, multiple expressed sequences detected by gene-trap clones, including clone D016D06 (3, 4), were co-localized with the cDNA clone AK044220 (Fig. 1A; Fig. S1). Clone D016D06, deposited by the German GeneTrap Consortium (GGTC) (http://tikus.gsf.de) (3, 4), was derived from insertion of a retroviral construct, rFlpROSAβgeo in 129S2 ES cells (Fig. 1A and C). The rFlpROSAβgeo construct carries a promoterless reporter gene, the β−geo cassette - an in-frame fusion of the β-galactosidase and neomycin resistance (Neor) gene (5), with a splicing acceptor (SA) immediately upstream, and a polyA signal downstream of the β−geo cassette (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytoplasmic E2f4 Forms Organizing Centres for Initiation of Centriole Amplification During Multiciliogenesis
    ARTICLE Received 13 Feb 2017 | Accepted 8 May 2017 | Published 4 Jul 2017 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15857 OPEN Cytoplasmic E2f4 forms organizing centres for initiation of centriole amplification during multiciliogenesis Munemasa Mori1, Renin Hazan2, Paul S. Danielian2, John E. Mahoney1,w, Huijun Li1, Jining Lu1, Emily S. Miller2, Xueliang Zhu3, Jacqueline A. Lees2 & Wellington V. Cardoso1 Abnormal development of multiciliated cells is a hallmark of a variety of human conditions associated with chronic airway diseases, hydrocephalus and infertility. Multiciliogenesis requires both activation of a specialized transcriptional program and assembly of cytoplasmic structures for large-scale centriole amplification that generates basal bodies. It remains unclear, however, what mechanism initiates formation of these multiprotein complexes in epithelial progenitors. Here we show that this is triggered by nucleocytoplasmic translocation of the transcription factor E2f4. After inducing a transcriptional program of centriole biogenesis, E2f4 forms apical cytoplasmic organizing centres for assembly and nucleation of deuterosomes. Using genetically altered mice and E2F4 mutant proteins we demonstrate that centriole amplification is crucially dependent on these organizing centres and that, without cytoplasmic E2f4, deuterosomes are not assembled, halting multiciliogenesis. Thus, E2f4 integrates nuclear and previously unsuspected cytoplasmic events of centriole amplification, providing new perspectives for the understanding of normal ciliogenesis, ciliopathies and cancer. 1 Columbia Center for Human Development, Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Allergy Critical Care, Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, New York 10032, USA. 2 David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA. 3 State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 320 Yueyang Road, Shanghai 200031, China.
    [Show full text]
  • Ninein, a Microtubule Minus-End Anchoring Protein 3015 Analysis As Described Previously (Henderson Et Al., 1994)
    Journal of Cell Science 113, 3013-3023 (2000) 3013 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 2000 JCS1634 Microtubule minus-end anchorage at centrosomal and non-centrosomal sites: the role of ninein Mette M. Mogensen1,*, Azer Malik1, Matthieu Piel2, Veronique Bouckson-Castaing2 and Michel Bornens2 1Department of Anatomy and Physiology, MSI/WTB complex, Dow Street, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 5EH, UK 2Institute Curie, UMR 144-CNRS, 26 Rue d’Ulm, 75248 Paris Cedex 05, France *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 14 June; published on WWW 9 August 2000 SUMMARY The novel concept of a centrosomal anchoring complex, epithelial cells, where the vast majority of the microtubule which is distinct from the γ-tubulin nucleating complex, has minus-ends are associated with apical non-centrosomal previously been proposed following studies on cochlear sites, suggests that it is not directly involved in microtubule epithelial cells. In this investigation we present evidence nucleation. Ninein seems to play an important role in the from two different cell systems which suggests that the positioning and anchorage of the microtubule minus-ends centrosomal protein ninein is a strong candidate for the in these epithelial cells. Evidence is presented which proposed anchoring complex. suggests that ninein is released from the centrosome, Ninein has recently been observed in cultured fibroblast translocated with the microtubules, and is responsible for cells to localise primarily to the post-mitotic mother the anchorage of microtubule minus-ends to the apical centriole, which is the focus for a classic radial microtubule sites. We propose that ninein is a non-nucleating array.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Bioscientifica.Com at 10/04/2021 03:09:50PM Via Free Access
    242 S-M Ho et al. Regulation of centrosome 24:2 83–96 Research duplication by BPA analogues Bisphenol A and its analogues disrupt centrosome cycle and microtubule dynamics in prostate cancer Shuk-Mei Ho1,2,3,4, Rahul Rao1, Sarah To1,5,6, Emma Schoch1 and Pheruza Tarapore1,2,3 1Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA 2Center for Environmental Genetics, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Correspondence 3Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA should be addressed 4Cincinnati Veteran Affairs Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA to S-M Ho or P Tarapore 5Center for Cancer Research, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia Email 6Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia [email protected] or [email protected] Abstract Humans are increasingly exposed to structural analogues of bisphenol A (BPA), as Key Words BPA is being replaced by these compounds in BPA-free consumer products. We have f endocrine-disrupting previously shown that chronic and developmental exposure to BPA is associated with chemicals increased prostate cancer (PCa) risk in human and animal models. Here, we examine f bisphenol A analogues whether exposure of PCa cells (LNCaP, C4-2) to low-dose BPA and its structural analogues f BPA (BPS, BPF, BPAF, TBBPA, DMBPA and TMBPA) affects centrosome amplification (CA), f BPS a hallmark of cancer initiation and progression. We found that exposure to BPA, BPS, f BPF DMBPA and TBBPA, in descending order, increased the number of cells with CA, in a non- f TBBPA Endocrine-Related Cancer Endocrine-Related monotonic dose–response manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Cep70, a Centrosomal Protein with New Roles in Breast Cancer Dissemination and Metastasis, a Facilitator of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition?
    Is Cep70, a centrosomal protein with new roles in breast cancer dissemination and metastasis, a facilitator of epithelial-mesenchymal transition? Pedro A. Lazo 1,2 1 Experimental Therapeutics and Translational Oncology Program, Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain 2 Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain Running title: Cep70 and EMT Disclosures: None declared. Contact address: [email protected] 1 Introduction Microtubules are driving mechanisms of chromosomes, intracellular organelle movement, and cell shape and motility. Microtubules are organized on centrosomes, which are assembled in microtubule-organizing centers (MTOC). In mitosis there is no nuclear envelope and centromeres associated to microtubules are mainly involved in chromosome redistribution into daughter cells. In differentiated cells the microtubule- organizing centers are dispersed in the cytoplasm (non centrosomal (ncMTOC)) and interact with the minus end of microtubules through γ-tubulin. 1 However, it is not known if the microtubule contribution to tumor biology is only by facilitating tumor aneuploidy. During tumor dissemination, a process not linked to cell division, important changes take place in cell shape and motility. Microtubules are very dynamic because of their inherent structural instability, and this plasticity facilitates their reorganization during the epithelial-mesenchymal
    [Show full text]
  • Assembly of Centrosomal Proteins and Microtubule Organization Depends on PCM-1
    JCBArticle Assembly of centrosomal proteins and microtubule organization depends on PCM-1 Alexander Dammermann and Andreas Merdes Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK he protein PCM-1 localizes to cytoplasmic granules treatment of cells with the microtubule inhibitor nocodazole. known as “centriolar satellites” that are partly enriched Inhibition or depletion of PCM-1 function further disrupted T around the centrosome. We inhibited PCM-1 function the radial organization of microtubules without affecting using a variety of approaches: microinjection of antibodies microtubule nucleation. Loss of microtubule organization into cultured cells, overexpression of a PCM-1 deletion was also observed after centrin or ninein depletion. Our mutant, and specific depletion of PCM-1 by siRNA. All data suggest that PCM-1–containing centriolar satellites are Downloaded from approaches led to reduced targeting of centrin, pericentrin, involved in the microtubule- and dynactin-dependent recruit- and ninein to the centrosome. Similar effects were seen ment of proteins to the centrosome, of which centrin and upon inhibition of dynactin by dynamitin, and after prolonged ninein are required for interphase microtubule organization. jcb.rupress.org Introduction Microtubule organization is essential for directional intra- the centrosomal surface or subsequently released and anchored cellular transport, for the modulation of cell morphology in other places of the cell (Mogensen, 1999). The initial step and locomotion, and for the formation of the spindle apparatus of microtubule nucleation is dependent on the function of during cell division. With the exception of plants, most cells 25S ring complexes of the protein ␥-tubulin and associated on December 31, 2017 organize their microtubule network using specialized structures, proteins (Zheng et al., 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • CEP63 Deficiency Promotes P53-Dependent Microcephaly and Reveals a Role for the Centrosome in Meiotic Recombination
    ARTICLE Received 25 Mar 2015 | Accepted 30 May 2015 | Published 9 Jul 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8676 CEP63 deficiency promotes p53-dependent microcephaly and reveals a role for the centrosome in meiotic recombination Marko Marjanovic´1,2, Carlos Sa´nchez-Huertas1,*, Berta Terre´1,*, Rocı´oGo´mez3, Jan Frederik Scheel4,w, Sarai Pacheco5,6, Philip A. Knobel1, Ana Martı´nez-Marchal5,6, Suvi Aivio1, Lluı´s Palenzuela1, Uwe Wolfrum4, Peter J. McKinnon7, Jose´ A. Suja3, Ignasi Roig5,6, Vincenzo Costanzo8, Jens Lu¨ders1 & Travis H. Stracker1 CEP63 is a centrosomal protein that facilitates centriole duplication and is regulated by the DNA damage response. Mutations in CEP63 cause Seckel syndrome, a human disease characterized by microcephaly and dwarfism. Here we demonstrate that Cep63-deficient mice recapitulate Seckel syndrome pathology. The attrition of neural progenitor cells involves p53-dependent cell death, and brain size is rescued by the deletion of p53. Cell death is not the result of an aberrant DNA damage response but is triggered by centrosome-based mitotic errors. In addition, Cep63 loss severely impairs meiotic recombination, leading to profound male infertility. Cep63-deficient spermatocytes display numerical and structural centrosome aberrations, chromosome entanglements and defective telomere clustering, suggesting that a reduction in centrosome-mediated chromosome movements underlies recombination failure. Our results provide novel insight into the molecular pathology of microcephaly and establish a role for the centrosome in meiotic recombination. 1 Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), Barcelona 08028, Spain. 2 Division of Molecular Medicine, Rud–er Bosˇkovic´ Institute, Zagreb 10000, Croatia. 3 Departamento de Biologı´a, Edificio de Biolo´gicas, Universidad Auto´noma de Madrid, Madrid 28049, Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • Microtubule Regulation in Cystic Fibrosis Pathophysiology
    MICROTUBULE REGULATION IN CYSTIC FIBROSIS PATHOPHYSIOLOGY By: SHARON MARIE RYMUT Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Thomas J Kelley Department of Pharmacology CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY August 2015 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/ dissertation of Sharon Marie Rymut candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree* Dissertation Advisor: Thomas J Kelley Committee Chair: Paul N MacDonald Committee Member: Ruth E Siegel Committee Member: Craig A Hodges Committee Member: Danny Manor Committee Member: Rebecca J Darrah Date of Defense: April 29, 2015 * We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. ii Dedication There are five chapters in this dissertation. To Mom, Dad, Joe, Marie and Susan, I dedicate one chapter to each of you. You can fight about which chapter you want later. iii Table of Contents Table of Contents................................................................................................................iv List of Tables .................................................................................................................... vii List of Figures .................................................................................................................. viii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. x List of Abbreviations .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]