Ester Boserup’S Legacy on Sustainability Human-Environment Interactions VOLUME 4
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ester Boserup's Legacy on Sustainability Orientations for Contemporary Research Fischer-Kowalski, Marina; Reenberg, Anette; Schaffartzik, Anke ; Mayer, Andreas
Ester Boserup's legacy on Sustainability Orientations for Contemporary Research Fischer-Kowalski, Marina; Reenberg, Anette; Schaffartzik, Anke ; Mayer, Andreas DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-8678-2 Publication date: 2014 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Fischer-Kowalski, M., Reenberg, A., Schaffartzik, A., & Mayer, A. (Eds.) (2014). Ester Boserup's legacy on Sustainability: Orientations for Contemporary Research. Springer. Human - Environment Interactions Vol. 4 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8678-2 Download date: 26. sep.. 2021 Ester Boserup’s Legacy on Sustainability Human-Environment Interactions VOLUME 4 Series Editor: Professor Emilio F. Moran, Michigan State University (Geography) Editorial Board: Barbara Entwisle, Univ. of North Carolina (Sociology) David Foster, Harvard University (Ecology) Helmut Haberl, Klagenfurt University (Socio-ecological System Science) Billie Lee Turner II, Arizona State University (Geography) Peter H. Verburg, University of Amsterdam (Environmental Sciences, Modeling) For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/8599 Marina Fischer-Kowalski • Anette Reenberg Anke Schaffartzik • Andreas Mayer Editors Ester Boserup’s Legacy on Sustainability Orientations for Contemporary Research Editors Marina Fischer-Kowalski Anke Schaffartzik Institute of Social Ecology Institute of Social Ecology Alpen Adria University Alpen Adria University Vienna Vienna Austria Austria Anette Reenberg Andreas Mayer Dept. Geosciences & Resource Mgmt Institute -
Women in Agriculture: What Development Can Do
WOMEN IN AGRICULTURE: WHAT DEVELOPMENT CAN DO by Mayra Buvinic and Rekha Mehra 1990 This paper was supported by a Ford Foundation grant to the ICRW. A slightly different version of it has been published as a book chapter entitled "Women and Agricultural Development: A Review of Two Decades of Work" in Agricultural Development in the Third World, edited by John Staats and Carl Eicher, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. : International Center for Research on Women 1717 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Suite 302 Washington, D.C. 20036 Copyright © 1990 International Center for Research on Women Contents Introduction ............................................................. 1 The Research Evidence on Women's Roles in Farming System ......................... 2 The Impact of New Technology on Women Farmers ................................ 9 Projects for Rural Women .................................................. 17 An Agenda for the 1990s .................................................. 21 Notes ................................................................ 23 References ............................................................ 24 Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Susan Fleck and Florence A. Yagoda for their competent research assistance, Libby Lopez for her diligent and patient retyping of many drafts, Linda Sturgeon for skillfully typing the tables, and Carolyn Falk for help with production. Introduction Before 1970, analyses of women's roles in Third World agriculture were found mostly in ethnographic studies of traditional societies. Ester Boserup, an economist, deserves full credit for placing this subject squarely within economic development. In 1970 she presented the first comprehensive, empirically based analysis of women's participation in agriculture and linked the evolution of farming systems to population pressures, technological change in agriculture, and the participation of women in the labor force. Boserup (1970) distinguished three types of agricultural systems: female, male, and mixed. -
DCDC 2011-2012 Annual Progress Report Decision Center for A
DCDC 2011-2012 Annual Progress Report Decision Center for a Desert City II: Urban Climate Adaptation SES-0951366 Principal Investigators Dave White (PI, Co-Director) Charles Redman (Co-PI, Co-Director) Craig Kirkwood (Co-PI) Margaret Nelson (Co-PI) Submitted to the National Science Foundation Via Fastlane June 1, 2012 Decision Center for a Desert City II DCDC 2011-2012 Principal Investigators: Table of Contents Dave White (PI, Co-Director) Charles Redman (Co-PI, Co-Director) I. Introduction to DCDC 3 Craig Kirkwood (Co-PI) Margaret Nelson (Co-PI) II. Findings of Research Activities 14 Executive Committee: Dave White Craig Kirkwood III. Education and Development 18 Kelli Larson Margaret Nelson IV. Outreach Activities 20 Charles Redman V. Kerry Smith Liz Marquez V. Contributions 25 Staff: VI. Partner Organizations 28 Katja Brundiers Sarah Jones Taylor Ketchum VII. DCDC Participants 33 Liz Marquez Estella O’Hanlon Annissa Olsen Ray Quay David Sampson Sally Wittlinger Teams: Adaptation Decision Analysis Decision Processes Institutional Roles in Decision Making Boundary Studies Education and Resource Development Outcomes Distributional Effects Economic Feedbacks Urban System Impacts Uncertainties Climate Change - 2 - I. Introduction to DCDC The Decision Center for a Desert City (DCDC) at Arizona State University (ASU) was established in 2004 by the National Science Foundation (NSF) to advance scientific understanding of environmental decision making under conditions of uncertainty. Bolstered by new funding from the NSF, “DCDC II” was launched in October 2010 to expand its already-extensive research agenda, further engage the policy community, and forge stronger ties between knowledge and action. In this second phase of DCDC funding, we are developing new fundamental knowledge about decision making from three interdisciplinary perspectives: climatic uncertainties, urban-system dynamics, and adaptation decisions. -
Overpopulation Is Not the Problem - Nytimes.Com Page 1 of 3
Overpopulation Is Not the Problem - NYTimes.com Page 1 of 3 September 13, 2013 Overpopulation Is Not the Problem By ERLE C. ELLIS BALTIMORE — MANY scientists believe that by transforming the earth’s natural landscapes, we are undermining the very life support systems that sustain us. Like bacteria in a petri dish, our exploding numbers are reaching the limits of a finite planet, with dire consequences. Disaster looms as humans exceed the earth’s natural carrying capacity. Clearly, this could not be sustainable. This is nonsense. Even today, I hear some of my scientific colleagues repeat these and similar claims — often unchallenged. And once, I too believed them. Yet these claims demonstrate a profound misunderstanding of the ecology of human systems. The conditions that sustain humanity are not natural and never have been. Since prehistory, human populations have used technologies and engineered ecosystems to sustain populations well beyond the capabilities of unaltered “natural” ecosystems. The evidence from archaeology is clear. Our predecessors in the genus Homo used social hunting strategies and tools of stone and fire to extract more sustenance from landscapes than would otherwise be possible. And, of course, Homo sapiens went much further, learning over generations, once their preferred big game became rare or extinct, to make use of a far broader spectrum of species. They did this by extracting more nutrients from these species by cooking and grinding them, by propagating the most useful species and by burning woodlands to enhance hunting and foraging success. Even before the last ice age had ended, thousands of years before agriculture, hunter- gatherer societies were well established across the earth and depended increasingly on sophisticated technological strategies to sustain growing populations in landscapes long ago transformed by their ancestors. -
Cover Sheet for Proposal to the National Science Foundation
COVER SHEET FOR PROPOSAL TO THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT/SOLICITATION NO./CLOSING DATE/if not in response to a program announcement/solicitation enter NSF 02-2 FOR NSF USE ONLY NSF 02-010 01/24/02 NSF PROPOSAL NUMBER FOR CONSIDERATION BY NSF ORGANIZATION UNIT(S) (Indicate the most specific unit known, i.e. program, division, etc.) BCS - BE: DYN COUPLED NATURAL-HUMAN 0216560 DATE RECEIVED NUMBER OF COPIES DIVISION ASSIGNED FUND CODE DUNS# (Data Universal Numbering System) FILE LOCATION 943360412 EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN) OR SHOW PREVIOUS AWARD NO. IF THIS IS IS THIS PROPOSAL BEING SUBMITTED TO ANOTHER FEDERAL TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (TIN) A RENEWAL AGENCY? YES NO IF YES, LIST ACRONYM(S) AN ACCOMPLISHMENT-BASED RENEWAL 860196696 NAME OF ORGANIZATION TO WHICH AWARD SHOULD BE MADE ADDRESS OF AWARDEE ORGANIZATION, INCLUDING 9 DIGIT ZIP CODE Arizona State University Arizona State University Box 3503 AWARDEE ORGANIZATION CODE (IF KNOWN) Tempe, AZ. 85287 0010819000 NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE ADDRESS OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, IF DIFFERENT, INCLUDING 9 DIGIT ZIP CODE PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE (IF KNOWN) IS AWARDEE ORGANIZATION (Check All That Apply) (See GPG II.C For Definitions) FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATION SMALL BUSINESS MINORITY BUSINESS WOMAN-OWNED BUSINESS TITLE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Agrarian Landscapes in Transition: A Cross-Scale Approach REQUESTED AMOUNT PROPOSED DURATION (1-60 MONTHS) REQUESTED STARTING DATE SHOW RELATED PREPROPOSAL NO., IF APPLICABLE $ 1,999,952 48months 01/01/03 CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX(ES) IF THIS PROPOSAL INCLUDES ANY OF THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW BEGINNING INVESTIGATOR (GPG I.A) HUMAN SUBJECTS (GPG II.C.11) DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (GPG II.C) Exemption Subsection or IRB App. -
Ancient Maya City of Calakmul, Campeche
World Heritage Scanned Nomination File Name: 1061.pdf UNESCO Region: LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN __________________________________________________________________________________________________ SITE NAME: Ancient Maya City of Calakmul, Campeche DATE OF INSCRIPTION: 29th June 2002 STATE PARTY: MEXICO CRITERIA: C (i)(ii)(iii)(iv) DECISION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE: Excerpt from the Report of the 26th Session of the World Heritage Committee Criterion (i): The many commemorative stelae at Calakmul are outstanding examples of Maya art, which throw much light on the political and spiritual development of the city. Criterion (ii): With a single site Calakmul displays an exceptionally well preserved series of monuments and open spaces representative of Maya architectural, artistic, and urban development over a period of twelve centuries. Criterion (iii): The political and spiritual way of life of the Maya cities of the Tierras Bajas region is admirably demonstrated by the impressive remains of Calakmul. Criterion (iv): Calakmul is an outstanding example of a significant phase in human settlement and the development of architecture BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS Calakmul, an important Maya site set deep in the tropical forest of the Tierras Bajas of southern Mexico, played a key role in the history of this region for more than twelve centuries. Its imposing structures and its characteristic overall layout are remarkably well preserved and give a vivid picture of life in an ancient Maya capital. 1.b State, Province or Region: Calakmul Municipality, Campeche Province 1.d Exact location: N18 07 21 W89 47 00 ANTIGUA CIUDAD MAYA DE CALAKMUL CAMPECHE INSCRIPTION A LA LISTE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL . 0 LOCALISATION ET DELIMITATION . 1 1. -
Tapir Population Patterns Under the Disappearance of Free- Standing Water
THERYA, 2019, Vol. 10 (3): XXX-XXX DOI: 10.12933/therya-19-902 ISSN 2007-3364 Tapir population patterns under the disappearance of free- standing water RAFAEL REYNA-HURTADO1*, DAVID SIMA-PANTÍ2, MARIA ANDRADE3, ANGELICA PADILLA3, OSCAR RETANA-GUAISCON4, KHIAVETT SANCHEZ-PINZÓN1, WILBER MARTINEZ1, NINON MEYER5, JOSÉ FERNANDO MOREIRA-RAMÍREZ6, NATALIA CARRILLO-REYNA7, CRYSIA MARINA RIVERO-HERNÁNDEZ1,8, ISABEL SERRANO MAC- GREGOR1, SOPHIE CALME9 AND NICOLAS ARIAS DOMINGUEZ10. 1 El Colegio de la Frontera Sur Unidad Campeche. Avenida Rancho s/n, Poligono 2ª, Lerma. Campeche, México. Email: rreyna@ ecosur.mx (RR-H), [email protected] (KS-P), [email protected] (WM), [email protected] (CMR), isabel_ [email protected] (IS-M). 2 CONANP, Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas, CP. 24640, Xpujil, Calakmul. Campeche, Mexico. Email: david.sima@ conanp.mx (DSP). 3 Pronatura Península de Yucatán. Calle 32#269, CP. 97205, Merida. Yucatán. Mexico. Email: [email protected] (MA), [email protected] (AP). 4 Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, CP. 24029, Campeche. Campeche, México. Email: [email protected] (ORG). 5 Fundación Yaguara, Ciudad del Saber, Panama City, Panama. Email: [email protected] (NM). 6 Wildlife Conservation Society, Guatemala Programa. Guatemala City, Guatemala. Email: [email protected] (JM-R). 7 El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad San Cristobal, Avenida Ma Auxiliadora, CP. 29290. San Cristobal de las Casas. Chiapas, Mexico. Email: [email protected] (NC-R). 8 Bioconciencia, A. C. Ciudad de México, México. Email: [email protected] (CMR). 9 El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad Chetumal, Avenida Centenario Km5.5, CP. 77014, Chetumal. -
«M 12Name» «Last Name»«Suffix»
American Philosophical Society HELD AT PHILADELPHIA FOR PROMOTING USEFUL KNOWLEDGE WWW . AMPHILSOC . ORG Election of New Members to the American Philosophical Society April 23, 2021 The following were offered membership in the Society: CLASS 1 MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES Joseph S. Francisco President’s Distinguished Professor of Earth and Environmental Science, Professor of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania; William E. Moore Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences and Chemistry, Purdue University Email: [email protected] Barbara V. Jacak Director, Nuclear Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Professor of Physics, University of California, Berkeley Email: [email protected] Deb Niemeier Clark Distinguished Chair Professor, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Director, Maryland Transportation Institute, University of Maryland Email: [email protected] Daniel G. Nocera Patterson Rockwood Professor of Energy, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University; Founder and Board of Directors, Kula Bio Email: [email protected] Billie Lee Turner II Distinguished Sustainability Scientist, Global Institute of Sustainability and Innovation, Regents’ Professor, Gilbert F. White Professor of Environment and Society, School of the Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning and School of Sustainability, Arizona State University; Distinguished Research Professor of Geography, Clark University Email: [email protected] International Michael Victor Berry -
Handbook of the American Association of Geographers
Handbook of the American Association of Geographers About the AAG Logo The AAG logo consists of a world map on the Berghaus Star projection within two concentric circles containing the name of the organization and the year of its founding (1904). The Association adopted the logo in 1911. Star projections were developed in Austria and Germany in the second half of the nineteenth century. The Berghaus Star projection, developed in 1879 by Hermann Berghaus at the Perthes publishing house in Gotha, Germany is a modification of earlier star projections. It retains the polar azimuthal characteristics of its predecessors, but interrupts the southern hemisphere only five times (at longitudes 16, 88, and 160 degrees West, and 56 and 128 degrees East). The earlier star projections interrupted the southern hemisphere at eight longitudes. 1 CONSTITUTION OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS (Updated Spring 2017) I. Name. The name of the organization shall be the Association of American Geographers. II. Objectives. The objectives of the Association shall be to further professional investigations in geography and to encourage the application of geographic findings in education, government, and business. The Association shall support these objectives by promoting acquaintance and discussion among its members and with scholars in related fields by stimulating research and scientific exploration, by encouraging the publication of scholarly studies, and by performing services to aid the advancement of its members and the field of geography. The Associa- tion shall receive and administer funds in support of research and publication in the field of geography. III. Membership 1. Individual Members. Persons who are interested in the objectives of the Association are eligible for membership and shall become Members upon payment of dues. -
Soot Sayers: an Integrated Approach to Charcoal Production in Calakmul, Mexico
SOOT SAYERS: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO CHARCOAL PRODUCTION IN CALAKMUL, MEXICO By SAM SCHRAMSKI A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2009 1 © 2009 Sam Schramski 2 To Don Eliseo Ek, a Calakmul institution unto himself 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Though not my first thesis undertaking in life, this is by far the most collaborative. Without the guidance from my supervisory committee, in particular my chair, Dr. Eric Keys, my research would have progressed little. Dr. Keys suffered the meanderings of someone non-geographical in his academic training stoically. The usual plaudits must also be given to my family, who suffered the meandering of someone nonsensical in his life training as well. Special credit must be given to my beleaguered undergraduate assistant, Thomas Felsmaier, whose spirited attempt at mapmaking really allowed me to call this a thesis in geography. Finally, credit must be given to the hardworking campesinos of Calakmul who provided me with endless surprises and dispelled some of my more rigid preconceptions. It is very difficult indeed to work with a city slickin’ güero who knows so little about country life. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................................... -
Ester Boserup: an Interdisciplinary Visionary Relevant for Sustainability
RETROSPECTIVE Ester Boserup: An interdisciplinary visionary relevant for sustainability B. L. Turner IIa,b,1 and Marina Fischer-Kowalskic Schools of aGeographical Sciences and Urban Planning; bSustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85268; and cInstitute for Social Ecology, Alpen Adria Universität, A-1070 Vienna, Austria argely unfettered by disciplinary structures) landscapes, the historical dogma, Ester Boserup observed dimensions on which Boserup elaborated Lhuman–environment relation- in Population and Technological Change: ships through an expansive ana- A Study of Long-Term Trends (6). lytical lens. Her ideas on agricultural The endogeneity of the techno-mana- change, gender, and development shook gerial strategies of agriculture was foun- up research and practice in the mid- dational to her thesis and influenced the 1960s and early 1970s and remain cogent induced innovation thesis explaining half a century later for the development the contemporary pathways of investment dimensions of sustainability. In this in and use of agricultural technology 100th year since her birth, it is worth- at large (7). Despite this, Boserup’s thesis while to take stock of her impact on re- was not well-developed regarding quali- search and practice and how her ideas tative shifts in technology (e.g., to fossil continue to shape and be reshaped by fuels) that fundamentally change land– current research. labor and thus, structural relationships in society (8). She did trace the broad Background strokes of industrial technology on Born in Copenhagen on May 18, 1910, agriculture in sparsely populated and Ester Borgesen graduated as Ester underdeveloped lands (6) and argued that Boserup in 1935 with a Candidatus it was not applicable to some subsistence Politices, a degree she described as mostly farmers because the relative costs of la- theoretical economics plus courses in so- bor- vs. -
Development Critiques and Alternatives: a Feminist Perspective
Development Critiques and Alternatives: A Feminist Perspective Margarita Aguinaga1, Miriam Lang2, Dunia Mokrani3, Alejandra Santillana4 Feminism thinking today must be emancipatory. It must be rooted in the diversity and potential of life and have a holistic perspective, looking at the whole picture. To reach its goal of becoming an emerging revolutionary movement, it must analyse the various dimensions of power in connection with each other, and hence any feminist critique of development will have an integrative approach. This contribution to the feminist debates about development brings together various dimensions, including the environment, economics, the productive model, colonialism and patriarchy. Taking a historical perspective, this chapter looks at the various contributions feminism has made to development. The authors feel that it is paramount to propose a form of analysis which is different from the classical academic and economic development discourse, since feminism arose precisely as a political challenge to the effects of an androcentric discourse, traditionally presented as scientific and universal, but which has systematically undermined other knowledge and has gained domination in a number of areas –including women’s bodies and speech, the mainstream arguments of medicine and psychoanalysis, as well as philosophy and anthropology (Dorlin, 2009). If feminism is seen as knowledge, similar to a genealogy, a proposal to transform life with a comprehensive perspective, it is possible to engage with both academia, political discourses and women’s individual and collective struggles to transform an unequal and unfair economic, social and political system. But above all, it enables us to draw on ideas arising from the wider Latin American debates.