DOCSLIB.ORG

Salazar-AAA-Decision-1.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Salazar-AAA-Decision-1.Pdf AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION (“AAA”) COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL AAA Case No. 01-17-0004-0880 UNITED STATES ANTI-DOPING AGENCY (USADA), Claimant and FINAL AWARD ALBERTO SALAZAR, Respondent. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 II. THE PARTIES................................................................................................................. 2 III. JURISDICTION .............................................................................................................. 3 IV. PROCEDURAL HISTORY............................................................................................. 3 A. Notice Letter ........................................................................................................ 3 B. Charging Letter .................................................................................................... 3 C. Procedural Motions and Hearing ......................................................................... 5 1. Preliminary Hearing and Scheduling Order No. 1 ................................... 5 a. Respondent’s Motion for More Definite Statement of Claims .......................................................................................... 5 b. USADA’s Motion to Amend Claim ............................................ 6 c. USADA’s Motion for Issuance of Subpoenas and/or to Move Location of Arbitration to Houston, Texas ........................ 6 2. Scheduling Order No. 2 ........................................................................... 7 3. Procedural Order No. 3 ............................................................................ 8 4. Procedural Order No. 4 ............................................................................ 9 5. Procedural Order No. 5 ............................................................................ 9 6. Procedural Order No. 6 ............................................................................ 9 7. Procedural Order No. 7 .......................................................................... 10 8. Procedural Order No. 8 .......................................................................... 10 9. Procedural Order No. 9 .......................................................................... 10 10. Procedural Order No. 10 ........................................................................ 10 11. Procedural Order No. 11 ........................................................................ 11 12. Procedural Order No. 12 ........................................................................ 11 13. Procedural Order No. 13 ........................................................................ 11 14. Procedural Order No. 14 ........................................................................ 12 15. Pre/Post-Hearing Briefs and In-Person Hearings .................................. 12 V. APPLICABLE RULES .................................................................................................. 13 VI. WITNESS LIST ............................................................................................................. 21 A. For USADA ....................................................................................................... 21 B. For Respondent: ................................................................................................. 22 -i- TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page VII. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ..................................................................................... 24 A. Submissions ....................................................................................................... 24 1. USADA’s Submissions .......................................................................... 24 2. Respondent’s Submissions..................................................................... 24 B. Decision and Reasoning – Statute of Limitations .............................................. 24 VIII. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................... 25 IX. THE L-CARNITINE INFUSIONS/INJECTIONS ........................................................ 25 A. Charges .............................................................................................................. 25 B. Factual Background ........................................................................................... 26 1. L-carnitine Research .............................................................................. 26 2. Magness Involvement ............................................................................ 27 3. Magness Receives L-carnitine Infusion ................................................. 31 4. Magness as Athlete ................................................................................ 33 5. NOP Athletes ......................................................................................... 34 6. Email Exchanges Regarding Infusions and Injections........................... 39 7. Alteration of Medical Records ............................................................... 43 8. Dr. Maguadog and the Compounding Corner Pharmacy ...................... 45 C. Administration and/or Attempted Administration – L-carnitine ....................... 46 1. Magness Infusion - Administration ....................................................... 47 a. USADA Submissions................................................................. 47 b. Respondent’s Submissions......................................................... 51 2. Decision and Reasoning - L-Carnitine – Administration – Magness Infusion ................................................................................... 54 3. Administration and/or Attempted Administration – L-carnitine - NOP Athletes ......................................................................................... 57 a. USADA Submissions................................................................. 57 b. Respondent’s Submissions......................................................... 62 4. Decision and Reasoning - Administration and/or Attempted Administration – L-Carnitine - NOP Athletes ....................................... 68 D. Complicity – L-carnitine – Magness Infusion and NOP Athletes ..................... 72 1. USADA’s Submissions - Complicity .................................................... 72 -ii- TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page a. Magness and NOP Athletes Infusion ......................................... 72 b. Intent .......................................................................................... 73 2. Respondent’s Submissions..................................................................... 74 a. Magness and NOP Athletes Infusion ......................................... 74 b. Intent .......................................................................................... 76 3. Decision and Reasoning - Complicity - L-carnitine – Magness Infusion and NOP Athletes .................................................................... 77 a. Magness Infusion ....................................................................... 78 b. NOP Athletes ............................................................................. 79 E. Tampering and/or Attempted Tampering - L-Carnitine .................................... 80 1. Submissions – Tampering and Attempted Tampering – L- Carnitine ................................................................................................. 81 a. Respondent’s Email Instructions to NOP Athletes Regarding L-carnitine ................................................................ 81 b. Magness Role ............................................................................. 84 c. Medical Records ........................................................................ 85 2. Decision and Reasoning – Tampering and/or Attempted Tampering – L-Carnitine ....................................................................... 86 a. Magness Role and Medical Records .......................................... 87 b. Respondent’s Email Instructions to NOP Athletes Regarding L-carnitine ................................................................ 87 X. RESPONDENT’S PERSONAL USE OF TESTOSTERONE ...................................... 88 A. Charges .............................................................................................................. 88 B. Factual Background ........................................................................................... 89 1. Respondent’s Use of Testosterone ......................................................... 89 2. Respondent’s Role in Medical Treatment of NOP Athletes – Focus on Increasing Testosterone Levels .............................................. 93 C. Submissions – Possession of Testosterone – Personal Use ............................... 95 1. USADA’s Submissions .......................................................................... 95 a. In Connection with an Athlete, Competition or training ........... 96 b. Acceptable Justification ............................................................. 97 2. Respondent’s Submissions..................................................................... 98 -iii- TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page a. In Connection with an Athlete, Competition or training ........... 98 b. Acceptable Justification ........................................................... 100 D. Decision and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 Tokyo Marathon Statistical Information
    2019 Tokyo Marathon Statistical Information Tokyo Marathon All Time list Performance Time Performers Name Nat Place Date 1 2:03:58 1 Wilson Kipsang KEN 1 26 Feb 2017 2 2:05:30 2 Dickson Chumba KEN 1 25 Feb 2018 3 2:05:42 Dickson Chumba 1 23 Feb 2014 4 2:05:51 3 Gideon Kipketer KEN 2 26 Feb 2017 5 2:05:57 4 Tadese Tola ETH 2 23 Feb 2014 6 2:06:00 5 Endeshaw Negesse ETH 1 22 Feb 2015 7 2:06:11 6 Yuta Shitara JPN 2 25 Feb 2018 8 2:06:25 Dickson Chumba 3 26 Feb 2017 9 2:06:30 7 Sammy Kitwara KEN 3 23 Feb 2014 10 2:06:33 8 Stephen Kiprotich UGA 2 22 Feb 2015 11 2:06:33 9 Amos Kipruto KEN 3 25 Feb 2018 12 2:06:34 Dickson Chumba 3 22 Feb 2015 13 2:06:42 10 Evans Chebet KEN 4 26 Feb 2017 14 2:06:47 Gideon Kipketer 4 25 Feb 2018 15 2:06:50 11 Dennis Kimetto KEN 1 24 Feb 2013 16 2:06:54 12 Hiroto Inoue JPN 5 25 Feb 2018 17 2:06:56 13 Feyisa Lilesa ETH 1 28 Feb 2016 18 2:06:58 14 Michael Kipyego KEN 2 24 Feb 2013 19 2:06:58 Michael Kipyego 4 23 Feb 2014 20 2:07:05 15 Peter Some KEN 5 23 Feb 2014 21 2:07:20 16 Shumi Dechasa BRN 4 22 Feb 2015 22 2:07:22 Peter Some 5 22 Feb 2015 23 2:07:23 17 Viktor Röthlin SUI 1 17 Feb 2008 24 2:07:25 18 Markos Geneti ETH 6 22 Feb 2015 25 2:07:30 Feyisa Lilesa 6 25 Feb 2018 26 2:07:33 19 Bernard Kipyego KEN 2 28 Feb 2016 27 2:07:34 Dickson Chumba 3 28 Feb 2016 28 2:07:35 20 Hailu Mekonnen ETH 1 27 Feb 2011 29 2:07:37 Michael Kipyego 1 26 Feb 2012 30 2:07:37 21 Geoffrey Kamworor Kipsang KEN 6 23 Feb 2014 31 2:07:39 22 Masato Imai JPN 7 22 Feb 2015 32 2:07:39 23 Alfers Lagat KEN 5 26 Feb 2017 33 2:07:40 24 Deresa Chimsa
    [Show full text]
  • Duel in the Sun: Alberto Salazar, Dick Beardsley, and Americas Greatest Marathon Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    DUEL IN THE SUN: ALBERTO SALAZAR, DICK BEARDSLEY, AND AMERICAS GREATEST MARATHON PDF, EPUB, EBOOK John Brant | 210 pages | 06 Mar 2007 | RODALE PRESS | 9781594866289 | English | Emmaus, PA, United States Duel in the Sun: Alberto Salazar, Dick Beardsley, and Americas Greatest Marathon PDF Book He's human. A great read. It was way too early for a serious ante, but not so early that the contenders could afford to ignore it; they had to burn precious energy reeling in the pair. John Brant. Squires wanted to keep Beardsley as removed from the race excitement as possible. DK Eyewitness. Books about crazy dedication obsession to pushing oneself to greater achievements. Paperback —. I think he and I have a special bond. Instead Beardsley soon began a descent into drug addiction that brought him perilously close to dying. That tore it, he thought; the best he could do now was crawl in. Their shadows are still with them, but they are unarmed. Dewey Decimal. The two men ran neck and neck for the final nine miles of the race, with Salazar pulling ahead in the end and winning by just two seconds. At age 34, he resumed training. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Dec 09, Derek rated it really liked it. So they camped out in the house of a town matron. But one day in , Salazar picked up a tract that his father had sent him. The result of this style is that the story of the marathon and the story of the two men's lives are told simultaneously throughout the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Matt Hart Final V3 Wed, 1/13 11:05AM 57:43
    Matt Hart_final v3 Wed, 1/13 11:05AM 57:43 SUMMARY KEYWORDS athletes, alberto, nike, alberto salazar, sport, testosterone, book, kara, running, coach, salazar, felt, adam, thought, story, epo, people, substances, dope, doctor SPEAKERS Justin Angle, Matt Hart, Jeff Meese J Justin Angle 00:00 Hey folks, please indulge me a brief special comment before today's episode. Doing this show is a great privilege. And with that privilege comes an obligation. My goal with these shows is to learn and to make sense of the world. As I sat with my daughter last Wednesday evening, watching events unfold at our nation's capitol, and trying to answer her many questions. Not much made sense. What are we watching? She kept asking. And the only answer I knew to be correct was watching history. Like many of you, I've been reading and listening and thinking a lot these last few days. One of the most profound things I read was from the Atlantic's and Applebaum. She wrote, we have promoted democracy in our movies and books. We speak of democracy in our speeches and lectures. We even sing about democracy, from sea to shining sea. In our national songs. We have entire government bureaus devoted to thinking about how we can help countries become and remain democratic. We fund institutions that do the same. And yet, by far, the most important weapon the United States of America has ever wielded in defense of democracy, in defense of political liberty, in defense of universal rights, in defense of the rule of law, was the power of example.
    [Show full text]
  • KINNEY@ CROSS COUNTRY CHAMPIONSHIPS R
    KINNEY@ CROSS COUNTRY CHAMPIONSHIPS r THE OFFICIAL OUTFITTER OF THE ft,j"WNF"CROSS~ • CHAMPIONSHIPSCOUNTRY SUB 4 athletic apparel is distributed nationally through better retail and sporting goods stores. For more information regarding SUB 4 products, CALL 1-800-782-4444 outside California or 1-800-782-3687 in California or write: SUB4 2620 Temple Heights Dr., Oceanside, CA 92056 KINNEY SHOE CORPORATION 233 BROADWAY NEW YORK. NY 10279-0099 212-720-4100 H.C. ROWEN PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER November 25, 1989 Dear Participants: It brings me great happiness to welcome you to the eleventh annual Kinney Cross Country Championships. Over the past decade, = have v!atched in amazement as the Kinney races have grown in size and stature to become the greatest event in high school sports. At Kinney Shoes, we believe that working hard and maintaining a positive perspective are the key ingredients to running a successful business. The same is true for cross country, and competition in general. None of you would be here if it weren't for your ee~icati0n and perseverance through good times and bad. For this, we offer a pat on the back and say "Great job." Kinney Shoes sponsors this event to give something back to ~he corr~unities that have supported us for nearly a century. The Kinney Cross Cross Country Championships are one small way we thank American families for their support. So from here on out, enjoy yourself. Have fun. Give your best and e~joy the competition. Good luck to all the runners! Sincerely, H old Rowen ,/,</±aresident ;?~~and C.E.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Media Table of contents Media information & fast facts ......................................................................................................... 3 Important media information ....................................................................................................................................................4 Race week Media Center..............................................................................................................................................................4 Race week schedule of events ..................................................................................................................................................7 Quick Facts ...........................................................................................................................................................................................8 Top storylines ......................................................................................................................................................................................10 Prize purse .............................................................................................................................................................................................13 Time bonuses ......................................................................................................................................................................................14 Participant demographics ............................................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Capitalism: Feminist Branding in a Neoliberal Society
    Feminist Capitalism: Feminist Branding in a Neoliberal Society Olivia J. Mayron-Mort Department of Media Studies, Pitzer College MS 190.1: Senior Seminar Dr. Jennifer Friedlander DeCember 4, 2020 Mayron-Mort 1 Feminist Capitalism: Feminist Branding in a Neoliberal Society In light of the new feminist wave, feminism has beCome commercially popular. Magazine Covers urge women to love their bodies, hit songs endorse female agency, and feminist rhetoriC fill the feeds of social media platforms. Brands have embodied this phenomenon through Campaigns revolving around diversity and female empowerment. This trend is prevalent in a range of industries from athletiCwear to lingerie and skincare lines. Whether they enCourage self- Confidence or confront bias, they Contribute to a brand image that showCase feminist ideals. This begs the question of how compatible feminism can be with capitalism. Along with the popularity of feminist brands tension emerges between the objeCtives of neoliberal capitalism and that of the feminist movement. This calls for an exploration of the complexities of feminism within a Capitalist society and the impliCations this holds for the feminist movement as well as the organizations that capitalize off it. I ask the question of whether feminist branding meaningfully furthers the goal of equality or produces a diluted version of feminism in pursuit of profit. Through the consideration of ViCtoria’s SeCret, Nike, and Billie I will examine the ways in whiCh feminism is co-opted by corporate brands and how this refleCts within the organization. Corporate social responsibility is beComing commonplaCe as for-profit organizations are increasingly expeCted to take a stand on social issues and advance a social agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • USATF Cross Country Championships Media Handbook
    TABLE OF CONTENTS NATIONAL CHAMPIONS LIST..................................................................................................................... 2 NCAA DIVISION I CHAMPIONS LIST .......................................................................................................... 7 U.S. INTERNATIONAL CROSS COUNTRY TRIALS ........................................................................................ 9 HISTORY OF INTERNATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS ........................................................................................ 20 APPENDIX A – 2009 USATF CROSS COUNTRY CHAMPIONSHIPS RESULTS ............................................... 62 APPENDIX B –2009 USATF CLUB NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS RESULTS .................................................. 70 USATF MISSION STATEMENT The mission of USATF is to foster sustained competitive excellence, interest, and participation in the sports of track & field, long distance running, and race walking CREDITS The 30th annual U.S. Cross Country Handbook is an official publication of USA Track & Field. ©2011 USA Track & Field, 132 E. Washington St., Suite 800, Indianapolis, IN 46204 317-261-0500; www.usatf.org 2011 U.S. Cross Country Handbook • 1 HISTORY OF THE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS USA Track & Field MEN: Year Champion Team Champion-score 1954 Gordon McKenzie New York AC-45 1890 William Day Prospect Harriers-41 1955 Horace Ashenfelter New York AC-28 1891 M. Kennedy Prospect Harriers-21 1956 Horace Ashenfelter New York AC-46 1892 Edward Carter Suburban Harriers-41 1957 John Macy New York AC-45 1893-96 Not Contested 1958 John Macy New York AC-28 1897 George Orton Knickerbocker AC-31 1959 Al Lawrence Houston TFC-30 1898 George Orton Knickerbocker AC-42 1960 Al Lawrence Houston TFC-33 1899-1900 Not Contested 1961 Bruce Kidd Houston TFC-35 1901 Jerry Pierce Pastime AC-20 1962 Pete McArdle Los Angeles TC-40 1902 Not Contested 1963 Bruce Kidd Los Angeles TC-47 1903 John Joyce New York AC-21 1964 Dave Ellis Los Angeles TC-29 1904 Not Contested 1965 Ron Larrieu Toronto Olympic Club-40 1905 W.J.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 USA Olympic Team Trials: Men's Marathon Media Guide Supplement
    2004 U.S. Olympic Team Trials - Men’s Marathon Guide Supplement This publication is intended to be used with “On the Roads” special edition for the U.S. Olympic Team Trials - Men’s Marathon Guide ‘04 Male Qualifier Updates in 2004: Stats for the 2004 Male Qualifiers as of OCCUPATION # January 20, 2004 (98 respondents) Athlete 31 All data is for ‘04 Entrants Except as Noted Teacher/Professor 16 Sales 13 AVERAGE AGE Coach 10 30.3 years for qualifiers, 30.2 for entrants Student 5 (was 27.5 in ‘84, 31.9 in ‘00) Manager 3 Packaging Engineer 1 Business Owner 2 Pediatrician 1 AVERAGE HEIGHT Development Manager 2 Physical Therapist 1 5’'-8.5” Graphics Designer 2 Planner 1 Teacher Aide 2 AVERAGE WEIGHT Researcher 1 U.S. Army 2 140 lbs. Systems Analyst 1 Writer 2 Systems Engineer 1 in 2004: Bartender 1 Technical Analyst 1 SINGLE (60) 61% Cardio Technician 1 Technical Specialist 1 MARRIED (38) 39% Communications Specialist 1 U.S. Navy Officer 1 Out of 98 Consultant 1 Webmaster 1 Customer Service Rep 1 in 2000: Engineer 1 in 2000: SINGLE (58) 51% FedEx Pilot 1 OCCUPATION # MARRIED (55) 49% Film 1 Teacher/Professor 16 Out of 113 Gardener 1 Athlete 14 GIS Tech 1 Coach 11 TOP STATES (MEN ONLY) Guidance Counselor 1 Student 8 (see “On the Roads” for complete list) Horse Groomer 1 Sales 4 1. California 15 International Ship Broker 1 Accountant 4 2. Michigan 12 Mechanical Engineer 1 3. Colorado 10 4. Oregon 6 Virginia 6 Contents: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Results by Record Timing Payton Jordan Cardinal Invitational 4/29/2012 Stanford University --Stanford, California Results Event
    Results by Record Timing Payton Jordan Cardinal Invitational 4/29/2012 Stanford University --Stanford, California Results Event 1 Men 100 Meter Dash ================================================================ Name Year School Finals ================================================================ Section 1 Wind: 0.2 1 547 Colin Hepburn Stanford 10.83 2 784 Andrew Nathan British Colu 11.02 3 555 Jamal Patterson Stanford 11.27 4 476 Dennis Nicolas Simon Fraser 11.32 Event 2 Men 200 Meter Dash ================================================================ Name Year School Finals ================================================================ Section 1 Wind: 3.0 1 547 Colin Hepburn Stanford 21.53 2 784 Andrew Nathan British Colu 22.00 3 828 Tom Blocker Cal 22.05 4 549 James Jones Stanford 22.64 5 538 Darian Brooks Stanford 22.77 Event 3 Men 400 Meter Dash ================================================================ Name Year School Finals ================================================================ Section 1 1 553 Amaechi Morton Stanford 46.12 2 827 Steven Solomon Unattached 46.32 3 675 Antione Drakeford Unattached 46.33 4 540 Spencer Chase Stanford 47.04 5 822 Joel Stallworth Unattached 47.20 6 717 Logan Sharpe Unattached 47.55 7 680 simon Fitzpatrick Unattached 48.94 8 559 Rollins Stallworth Stanford 50.88 Event 4 Men 800 Meter Run ================================================================ Name Year School Finals ================================================================ 1 447 Prince Mumba Santa Monica TC 1:47.04
    [Show full text]
  • "...Proving Oneself Was Nothing New to Me."
    Amol Saxena Interview No. 24 Thursday, March 22nd, 2012 "...proving oneself was nothing new to me." Amol Saxena lives by Gandhi's philosophy "Be the change you want to see in the world." Amol's practice specializes in Sports Medicine and Foot & Ankle Surgery in Palo Alto, California. He has pioneered several surgical techniques (including Achilles procedures). He is an international and nationally recognized surgeon, speaker and author, and has published over 100 articles. Dr. Saxena is the editor of “International Advances in Foot and Ankle Surgery” (Springer 2012). He serves on the editorial Board for Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery and for Muscle, Ligament & Tendon (Italian). He is an instructor for the German Association for Foot Surgery. In 2004 Amol was awarded Humanitarian of the year by the CPMA. He currently has treated and operated on dozens of Olympians from around the world (including Gold Medalists and world record holders), and Olympic Trials qualifiers, numerous professional athletes including from the Nike Oregon Project, Golden State Warriors, San Francisco Giants and 49ers, and San Jose Earthquakes, and many top area high school athletic scholarship winners. Dr. Saxena is board certified/Re-certified in Foot and Reconstructive Rear-foot/Ankle Surgery (American Board of Podiatric Surgery), Fellow American College of Foot & Ankle Surgeons, American Academy Podiatric Sports Medicine (which he was presented the Barnes Award for outstanding research in 2011) , and serves as section Chief of Podiatric Surgery at Stanford University Hospital. He has competed in several Boston Marathons and Duathlon (run, bike, run) World Championships. He is married to Karen and has three children.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected]> Subject: RRW: Rupp Upset, Huddle Defends at USA Championships 10,000M Date: June 23, 2017 at 7:40:45 AM PDT To: [email protected]
    From: Race Results Weekly <[email protected]> Subject: RRW: Rupp Upset, Huddle Defends At USA Championships 10,000m Date: June 23, 2017 at 7:40:45 AM PDT To: [email protected] RUPP UPSET, HUDDLE DEFENDS AT USA CHAMPIONSHIPS 10,000M By David Monti, @d9monti (c) 2017 Race Results Weekly, all rights reserved SACRAMENTO, Calif. (22-Jun) -- Galen Rupp's streak of eight consecutive USA 10,000m titles came to an end here tonight at Hornet Stadium when the two-time Olympic medalist faded in the final lap of choppy and slow race which was won by Oregon Track Club Elite's Hassan Mead in 29:01.44. Rupp, who runs for the Nike Oregon Project, finished fifth. On the women's side, Saucony's Molly Huddle extended her winning streak at these championships to three, comfortably winning the 25-lap race in a solid 31:19.86, the second- fastest by an American this year. MEN'S RACE BECAME CAT AND MOUSE AFFAIR While the women's contest was a traditional battle of endurance won off of a steady and strong pace, the men's race early on became a game of cat and mouse. Feeling no pressure to run a fast time, the men's pack jogged through the first 800 meters in 2:29, only slightly faster than the women (2:32). The group of 24 athletes was tightly bunched, with veteran Ben Bruce of Hoka Northern Arizona Elite at the front. With 19 laps to go, 2015 national road running champion Sam Chelanga became impatient. Coming down the homestretch, he shot to the lead and threw in a 64.7-second lap, followed by another at 65.1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship of Training Methods Between NCAA Division I Cross-Country Runners with 10,000 Meter Performance
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 4-1997 The Relationship of Training Methods Between NCAA Division I Cross-Country Runners with 10,000 Meter Performance Max J. Kurz Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Part of the Health and Physical Education Commons THE RELATIONSHIP OF TRAINING METHODS BETWEEN NCAA DIVISION I CROSS-COUNTRY RUNNERS WITH 10,000 METER PERFORMANCE A Thesis Presented to the School of Health, Physical Education and Recreation and the Faculty of the Graduate College University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science University of Nebraska at Omaha by Max J. Kurz April, 1997 UMI Number: EP73245 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI EP73245 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProGuesC ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 i THESIS ACCEPTANCE Acceptance for the faculty of the Graduate College, University of Nebraska, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Science, University of Nebraska at Omaha. / Committee Name Department/School L Narm Department/School Chairperson Date Acknowledgements This thesis began during the winter months when Dr.
    [Show full text]