(Diptera) Katastrálneho Územia Košíc

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Diptera) Katastrálneho Územia Košíc LVIII NATURA CARPATICA 2017: 7 - 32 FAUNA DVOJKRÍDLOVCOV (DIPTERA) KATASTRÁLNEHO ÚZEMIA KOŠÍC Vladimír Straka & Karol Ox Ú v o d V našom príspevku sa zameriavame na zhodnotenie fauny dvojkrídleho hmyzu (Diptera) katastrálneho územia mesta Košice. Pri zhrnutí všetkých dostupných literárnych údajov o tejto problematike sme skonštatovali, že pre dané územie bola fauna dvojkrídlovcov pomerne dobre preskúmaná. Z literárnych údajov publikovaných z tejto oblasti poznáme dnes 246 druhov dvojkrídlovcov zo 48 čeľadí (Čepelák 1984, 1986; Skuhravá 2006; Suvák 2008, 2009, 2011; Pollet 2009; Straka a kol. 2010; Rettich 2012; Oboňa a kol. 2014; Bocková a kol. 2015). Vlastnými zbermi v rokoch 2008-2017 sme zistili celkom 452 druhov dvojkrídlovcov, z toho bolo ďalších 367 druhov zo 14 čeľadí doteraz neuvádzaných. Po zhrnutí všetkých literárnych údajov a našich vlastných pozorovaní dnes poznáme z katastrálneho územia Košíc spolu 613 druhov dvojkrídlovcov zo 62 čeľadí. V článku podávame súhrn všetkých nám zatiaľ prístupných poznatkov o zložení dipterofauny mesta Košice. Materiál a metodika Mesto Košice sa nachádza na východe Slovenska v Košickom kraji, v regióne Abov, na oboch brehoch rieky Hornád. Je rozdelené na 4 okresy (Košice I-IV) a 22 mestských častí. Do katastra Košíc zasahujú tri geomorfologické celky. Väčšina mesta leží v Košickej kotline. Volovské vrchy a Čierna hora s vrchovinami a hornatinami zasahujú iba na ich západnej a severozápadnej časti v tzv. mierne teplej oblasti. Centrum mesta je situované v nadmorskej výške približne 200 m.n.m. Na jeho území v tzv. teplej oblasti kotliny dominujú roviny a pahorkatiny. Najvyšším bodom na území je Vysoký vrch (851 m.n.m.) v pohorí Čierna hora. V katastri mesta sú aj tri chránené územia. Menovite ide o dve prírodné pamiatky (PP), Kavečanskú stráň v 4. stupni ochrany a Vysoký vrch v 5. stupni ochrany. Od roku 2002 je za chránený areál (CH) vyhlásená aj Košická botanická záhrada vo 4. stupni ochrany. Adresa: RNDr. Vladimír Straka, Gogoľova 10/30, 03601 Martin, e-mail: [email protected] Karol Ox, Amurská 5, 04012 Košice, e-mail: [email protected] 7 Výsledky faunistického prieskumu len intravilánov obcí sú dosť zriedkavé, nakoľko je to pre narušovanie vlastníckych vzťahov obyvateľov dosť zložité. Zväčša je možné postupovať len individuálnymi zbermi. Literárne údaje z obcí sú často všeobecné alebo len útržkovité. Pomerne schodná cesta je fotodokumentácia jednotlivých druhov, čo vyžaduje odbornú prípravu na zachytenie najdôležitejších rozlišovacích znakov. Zber dokladového materiálu robil druhý autor v rozpätí rokov 2008–2016, pričom pripravil bohatú foto- dokumentáciu, dostatočnú na presnú druhovú determináciu. Dokladový materiál s našou spoločnou determináciou je uložený v jeho súkromnej zbierke. Súhrnná fotodokumentácia je dostupná na stránke www.hmyzslovenska.info. Prieskum dvojkrídlovcov bol robený od centra starého mesta s geografickým kódom 48°72′21.6″ N, 21°24′73.3″ E. Pokračoval na Zelený Dvor (48°77′33.6″ N, 21°28′97.4″ E), čo sú lúky a okraj lesa pri krematóriu severovýchodne od mesta pri rýchlostnej ceste R4, ktorá pokračuje k sídlisku Ťahanovce. Lokalita Bankov (48°44′41.1″ N, 21°12′37.8″ E) je časťou Košice-Sever na okraji lesa s lesnými cestami nad Botanickou záhradou UPJŠ. Študované plochy sú v okrese Košice I. Prieskum ďalej pokračoval v mestských častiach Myslava (48°42′48.6″ N, 21°12′07.6″ E) a Pereš (48°72′21.6″ N, 21°20′52.7″ E), ktoré ležia na západnom okraji mesta v okrese Košice II v susedstve priľahlých lesov. Z okresu Košice III, z lokality Furča (48°41′20.6″ N, 21°16′57.2″ E) máme jediný údaj o výskyte druhu Trichocera saltator od Vlada Lenárta, za čo mu ďakujeme. V prieskume sme pokračovali na trase Vyšné Opátske (48°42′39.9″ N, 21°16′47.9″ E), Nad Jazerom (48°41′37.5″ N, 21°17′49.5″ E) a po Krásnu n. Hornádom (48°40′41.7″ N, 21°18′30.3″ E) a Verejný cintorín (48°41′41.1″ N, 21°15′32.1″ E). Uvedené lokality sú východne od centra mesta, pred a za riekou Hornád v okrese Košice IV. Pri určovaní jednotlivých druhov sme používali publikácie viacerých autorov: Bańkowska (1963, 1979), Barták (1982), Bej-Bienko (1969), Bej-Bienko (1970), Chvála (1980, 1981, 1988, 1997), Chvála a kol. (1972), Doskočil (1977), Draber-Moňko (1964), Gregor a kol. (1995), Hering (1927), Landrock (1940), Lyneborg a kol. (1974), Mazánek (2006), Rozkošný (1966), Sack a kol. (1930), Skuhravá (1984, 2006), Skuhravá a kol. (1960), Straka (1975), Tóth (1977), Trojan (1956, 1959, 1962, 1963), Tschorsnig a kol. (1994) a Wéber (1975). Taxonómia jednotlivých druhov bola upravená na základe práce Jedličku a kol. (2009). Problematiku výskumu dvojkrídlovcov katastra Košíc sme začali štúdiom literárnych údajov, ktoré sme zahrnuli v samostatnej kapitolke v Tabuľke č. l. Menovite išlo o práce Čepeláka (1984, 1986), Oboňu a kol. (2014), Straku a kol. (2010), Bockovej a kol. (2015) a Skuhravej (2009). Prvý nález byľomora Obolodiplosis robiniae a drobničky Coenosia attenuata pre Slovensko udáva Suvák (2008, 2009). V ďalšej práci o hmyzých predátoroch z Botanickej záhrady v Košiciach Suvák (2011) uvádza aj 6 ďalších druhov dvojkrídlovcov. Nakoľko ide o vierohodné údaje uznávaných dipterológov, zahrnuli sme ich do našej tabuľky zistených druhov. Našim výskumom sme ich výskyt ale nepotvrdili. Počas výskumu sme sledovali aj stupeň ohrozenosti niektorých druhov podľa červeného (Ekosozoologického) zoznamu dvojkrídlovcov (Diptera) Slovenska, ktorý zostavili Jedlička a kol. (2001). Z druhov radených do kategórie LR: lc (menej ohrozené: najmenej ohrozené) sme zistili nasledujúce: Podľa IUCN z kategórie EN (ohrozené) sme zistili druh Dasypogon diadema (Asilidae) a z kategórie VU (zraniteľné) Stratiomys potamida (Stratiomyidae) (Obr. 1). 8 Poznámky k nálezom Druhy ako Chrysogaster basalis (Obr. 2) a Sphaerophoria fatarum (Obr. 3) sú prvými nálezmi pre Slovensko (Jedlička 2009). Drobnička Coenosia attenuata je nový invázny druh v súčasnosti s globálnym rozšírením. Začiatkom nového tisícročia bol tento druh, zrejme paleotropického pôvodu z Afriky, v Európe známy len zo Španielska a Cypru (Gregor a kol. 2002). Odtiaľ sa v rámci biologickej ochrany skleníkov dostal do Francúzska, Nemecka a Talianska. Na Slovensku sa objavil v roku 2006 v Botanickej záhrade UPJŠ v Košiciach (Suvák 2008). Pretože časť vývojového cyklu má drobnička v pôde, môže sa prenášať spolu so substrátom, napr pri transporte v kvetináčoch. Nový invázny druh komára Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus v roku 2012 odtiaľto udáva Rettich (2013). Podľa autora však ide zatiaľ o náhodný (epizódny) výskyt, pravdepodobne zavlečený cestnou alebo leteckou dopravou. V dôsledku ďalších klimatických zmien bude však pokračovať monitoring tohto druhu. Naopak k častým nálezom patrili druhy Anthomyia pluvialis (Obr. 4), Athrycia trepida, Geomyza tripunctata, Graphomya maculata (Obr. 5), Hybos culiciformis (Obr. 6), Chamaemyia polystigma, Meigenia mutabilis (Obr. 7), Renocera stroblii, Tipula excisa a Trixoscelis frontalis. S ú h r n Čepelák (1984, 1986) udáva z okolia Košíc celkom 120 druhov dvojkrídlovcov z 27 čeľadí. Straka a kol. (2010) zistili 106 druhov, pričom len 7 je spoločných s Čepelákom (1984, 1986). Oboňa & Ježek (2014) našli viac druhov z čeľade Psychodidae v Košickej kotline a zároveň z katastra Košíc dokladujú celkom 10 druhov. Z Botanickej záhrady UPJŠ v Košiciach udáva Pollet (2009) prvý nález dlhonôžky druhu Medetera veles pre Slovensko. Podobne v Botanickej záhrady našla Skuhravá (2009) jeden druh biľomora Mycodiplosis coniophaga. Pri štúdiu komárov (Culicidae), ako vektorov nebezpečných ochorení, ďalších 6 druhov pridali Bocková a kol. (2015). Prvý nález byľomora Obolodiplosis robiniae a drobničky Coenosia attenuata pre Slovensko opísal z Košíc Suvák v rokoch 2008 a 2009. Suvák (2011) zároveň v zozname hmyzých predátorov z Botanickej záhrady v Košiciach menuje aj ďalších 6 druhov dvojkrídlovcov. Doplňujúci výskyt invázneho druhu komára Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus z roku 2012 udáva Rettich (2013). Súhrnom doposiaľ publikovaných literárnych údajov poznáme zo študovaného územia spolu 246 druhov zo 48 čeľadí. Vlastnými zbermi sme zistili celkom 452 druhov, z ktorých bolo doteraz neuvádzaných 367 druhov. Celkove dnes poznáme z katastrálneho územia Košíc 613 druhov dvojkrídlovcov zo 62 čeľadí. Literatúra: Bańkowska R. 1963: Klucze do oznaczania owadów Polski. Część XXVII Muchówki – Diptera, Zes. 34 Syrphydae. Polski związek entomologiczny, 42, 1-236. Bańkowska R. 1979: Conopidae wyślepki (Insecta: Diptera). Fauna Polski, Tom 7. PWN, Warszava, 134. 9 Barták M. 1982: The Czechoslovak species of Rhamphomyia (Diptera, Empididae), with description of a new species from Central Europe. Acta Universitatis Carolinae - Biologica, 1980 (1982), 381-461. Bej-Bienko G. Ja. (ed.) 1969: Opredeliteľ nasekomych evropejskoj časti SSSR, V, pervaja časť, Izd. „Nauka“, Leningrad, 804 . Bej-Bienko G. Ja. (ed.) 1970: Opredeliteľ nasekomych evropejskoj časti SSSR, V, vtoraja časť, Izd. „Nauka“, Leningrad, 843. Bocková E., Iglódiová A. & Kočišová A. 2015: Potential mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) vector of Dirifilaria repens and Dirofilaria immisis in Urban areas of Eastern Slovakia. Parasitology Res., 114 (12), 4487–4492. Chvála M. (ed.) 1980: Krevsajíci mouchy a střečci. Fauna ČSSR, Vol. 22. Academia, Praha, 538. Chvála M. 1981: Revision of Central European species of the genus Oedalea (Diptera, Empididae). Acta ent. bohemoslov., 78, 122-139. Chvála M. 1989: Monograph of northern and central European species of Platypalpus Macq. (Diptera, Hybotidae), with data on the occurrence in Czechoslovakia.
Recommended publications
  • Natura Somogyiensis 1
    DOI:10.24394/NatSom.2001.1.423 Natura Somogyiensis 1 423-424 Kaposvár, 2001 Somogy megye fejeslegyeinek katalógusa (Diptera: Conopidae) TÓTH SÁNDOR TÓTH S.: Checklist of thick-headed flies of Somogy county (Diptera: Conopidae) Abstract: Out of the 40 thick-headed fly species recorded in Hungary, 25 taxa are proved to be found in Somogy county. The fauna of the area is poorly known. Some of the relatively rare species known from this area are Conops vesicularis Linnaeus, 1761, Dalmannia dorsalis (Fabricius, 1794), Leopoldius coronatus (Rondani, 1857), Myopa polystigma Rondani, 1857, Thecophora distincta (Meigen, 1824), Zodion notatum (Meigen, 1804). Bevezetés Magyarország fejeslegyeinek kutatottságát jónak nevezhetjük, azonban a fa­ unáról összefoglaló tanulmány még nem készült. A fajok száma mintegy 40-re becsülhető. A régebbi faunisztikai irodalomban nem sikerült Somogy megyére vonatkozó fejeslégy közlést találni. Csupán a területen szervezett programok keretében készült 3 dolgozat (CSIBY 1981, TÓTH 1992, 1995), továbbá a pub­ likálatlan adatokból összeállított kézirat (TÓTH előkészületben) tartalmaz ide­ vágó adatokat. Ennek figyelembe vételével, Somogy megyéből jelenleg 25 fejeslégy faj előfordulását tekinthetjük igazoltnak. A fauna kutatottságát köze­ pesnek mondhatjuk. A hazai fajok elterjedési és gyakorisági viszonyainak érté­ kelése még nem történt meg. Ezért egyelőre csak általánosságban beszélhetünk ritka fajokról. A faunalista tagjai közül ilyenek pl. az alábbiak: Conops vesicu­ laris Linnaeus, 1761, Dalmannia dorsalis (Fabricius,
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Martin Drake Vice Chairman Stuart Ball Secretary John Kramer Meetings Treasurer Howard Bentley Please use the Booking Form included in this Bulletin or downloaded from our Membership Sec. John Showers website Field Meetings Sec. Roger Morris Field Meetings Indoor Meetings Sec. Duncan Sivell Roger Morris 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QE Publicity Officer Erica McAlister [email protected] Conservation Officer Rob Wolton Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Duncan Sivell Ordinary Members Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD [email protected] Chris Spilling, Malcolm Smart, Mick Parker Nathan Medd, John Ismay, vacancy Bulletin contributions Unelected Members Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Dipterists Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Secretary 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. John Kramer Tel. 0116 212 5075 31 Ash Tree Road, Oadby, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE2 5TE. [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Treasurer Judy Webb Howard Bentley 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. 37, Biddenden Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, Kent. ME15 8JP Tel. 01865 377487 Tel. 01622 739452 [email protected] [email protected] Conservation Dipterists Digest contributions Robert Wolton Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ Dipterists Digest Editor Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate Survey 2020
    Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate survey 2020 (Coleoptera, Diptera and Aculeate Hymenoptera) Nigel Jones & Dr. Caroline Uff Shropshire Entomology Services CONTENTS Summary 3 Introduction ……………………………………………………….. 3 Methodology …………………………………………………….. 4 Results ………………………………………………………………. 5 Coleoptera – Beeetles 5 Method ……………………………………………………………. 6 Results ……………………………………………………………. 6 Analysis of saproxylic Coleoptera ……………………. 7 Conclusion ………………………………………………………. 8 Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera – true flies, bees, wasps ants 8 Diptera 8 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results ……………………………………………………………. 9 Aculeate Hymenoptera 9 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results …………………………………………………………….. 9 Analysis of Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera … 10 Conclusion Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera .. 11 Other species ……………………………………………………. 12 Wetland fauna ………………………………………………….. 12 Table 2 Key Coleoptera species ………………………… 13 Table 3 Key Diptera species ……………………………… 18 Table 4 Key aculeate Hymenoptera species ……… 21 Bibliography and references 22 Appendix 1 Conservation designations …………….. 24 Appendix 2 ………………………………………………………… 25 2 SUMMARY During 2020, 811 invertebrate species (mainly beetles, true-flies, bees, wasps and ants) were recorded from Millichope Park and a small area of adjoining arable estate. The park’s saproxylic beetle fauna, associated with dead wood and veteran trees, can be considered as nationally important. True flies associated with decaying wood add further significant species to the site’s saproxylic fauna. There is also a strong
    [Show full text]
  • CONOPIDAE IM BALTISCHEN BERNSTEIN Nr
    download Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde aus dem Staatlichen Museum für Naturkunde in Stuttgart Stuttgart I.Juni 1966 Nr. 154 Conopidae im Baltischen BernsMn (Diptera; Cyclorrhapha) Von Willi Hennig, Stuttgart Mit 27 Abbildungen Die Conopidae sind — ganz abgesehen von ihrer eigenartigen Morphologie und Lebensweise — eine besonders interessante Gruppe, weil sie nach Ansicht verschie- dener Autoren der Gesamtheit aller übrigen Schizophora als Schwestergruppe gegen- überstehen. Dazu ist allerdings zu bedenken, daß in die „Familie Conopidae" bis in die allerjüngste Zeit die Stylogastridae eingeschlossen wurden. Enderlein (1936) ver- wendet für die beiden Schwestergruppen die Namen Archischiza (mit der einzigen Familie Conopidae) und Muscaria (alle übrigen Schizophora). Seguy (1951 in Grasse) nennt sie, weniger glücklich, Conopoidea und Muscoidea. Auch Hendel (1936/37 in Kükenthal -Krumbach) und Rohdendorf (1964) vertreten die Annahme, daß zwischen den beiden Gruppen ein Schwestergruppenverhältnis besteht. Rohdendorf bringt das in seiner Stammbaumzeichnung (p. 265, Fig. 85) und Hendel mit Worten (p. 1876) zum Ausdruck: „Die sonst spezialisierten Conopiden zweigen danach vor der Gabe- lung der Schizophoren in Acalyptratae und Calyptratae ab ..." In ihren Systemen lassen beide Autoren ihre Überzeugung allerdings nicht erkennen; denn beide sind Anhänger einer typologischen Systematik: Ihre Systeme sind keine genauen Darstel- lungen der von ihnen angenommenen phylogenetischen Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen. Mit der Frage, ob die Annahme eines Schwestergruppenverhältnisses zwischen den Archischiza und den Muscaria (bzw. Conopoidea und Muscoidea im Sinne von Seguy) berechtigt ist, habe ich mich früher (1958) auseinandergesetzt mit dem auch heute noch gültigen Ergebnis, daß man „trotz der noch durchaus unzulänglichen Begründung das Bestehen eines Schwestergruppenverhältnisses zwischen den Conopidae und den ,übrigen Schizophora' doch wohl für wahrscheinlich halten" muß.
    [Show full text]
  • Conops Quadrifasciatus Geer 1776 – Species Registered in 2016 in the Republic of Moldova
    Sustainable use, protection of animal world and forest 172 management in the context of climate change CONOPS QUADRIFASCIATUS GEER 1776 – SPECIES REGISTERED IN 2016 IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA Asea M. Timus Institute of Zoology, Academy of Sciences of Moldova, Chişinau, e-mal: [email protected] In spring of 2016the Conops quadrifasciatus De Geer, 1776 species (Diptera, Conopidae) was recorded in the Republic of Moldova. The specimens of this spe- cies were observed in 03.IV.2016 on the plants from campus of SAUM. The species is aentomological curiosity, because imago presents phenomenon of the mimicrism and is very similar to wasps. For the first time in native literature, the species was mentions in “Animal world. Insects. 1983”: “Species widespread in the USSR, Eastern Europe and Asia Minor is “bolishegolovka 4-h polosnaia” C.quadrifasciatus”. According to the passage it goes without saying that, the species is widespread in the Republic of Moldova too. Other sources indicated that the species spreads from Europe to Siberia, and most often in Central Europe. According to the database of the Fauna Europaea, this species is re- corded in the following countries: Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Britain, Czech Repub- lic, Denmark, Finland, Switzerland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Lithua- nia, Luxembourg, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden. For Moldova is indicated as – absent, but for neighbouring states as follows: Romania – present and Ukraine – absent. Description. The adult has 10-15 mm body length, and due to long legs has a great look insect. The dominant color is dark brown (Fig. 1). The head is large, dark brown and with long spindly antennae.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkhill Green Spaces Wildlife Species List
    Yorkhill Green Spaces Wildlife Species List April 2021 update Yorkhill Green Spaces Species list Draft list of animals, plants, fungi, mosses and lichens recorded from Yorkhill, Glasgow. Main sites: Yorkhill Park, Overnewton Park and Kelvinhaugh Park (AKA Cherry Park). Other recorded sites: bank of River Kelvin at Bunhouse Rd/ Old Dumbarton Rd, Clyde Expressway path, casual records from streets and gardens in Yorkhill. Species total: 711 Vertebrates: Amhibians:1, Birds: 57, Fish: 7, Mammals (wild): 15 Invertebrates: Amphipods: 1, Ants: 3, Bees: 26, Beetles: 21, Butterflies: 11, Caddisflies: 2, Centipedes: 3, Earthworms: 2, Earwig: 1, Flatworms: 1, Flies: 61, Grasshoppers: 1, Harvestmen: 2, Lacewings: 2, Mayflies: 2, Mites: 4, Millipedes: 3, Moths: 149, True bugs: 13, Slugs & snails: 21, Spiders: 14, Springtails: 2, Wasps: 13, Woodlice: 5 Plants: Flowering plants: 174, Ferns: 5, Grasses: 13, Horsetail: 1, Liverworts: 7, Mosses:17, Trees: 19 Fungi and lichens: Fungi: 24, Lichens: 10 Conservation Status: NameSBL - Scottish Biodiversity List Priority Species Birds of Conservation Concern - Red List, Amber List Last Common name Species Taxon Record Common toad Bufo bufo amphiban 2012 Australian landhopper Arcitalitrus dorrieni amphipod 2021 Black garden ant Lasius niger ant 2020 Red ant Myrmica rubra ant 2021 Red ant Myrmica ruginodis ant 2014 Buff-tailed bumblebee Bombus terrestris bee 2021 Garden bumblebee Bombus hortorum bee 2020 Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum bee 2021 Heath bumblebee Bombus jonellus bee 2020 Red-tailed bumblebee Bombus
    [Show full text]
  • The Annals of Scottish Natural History
    RETURN TO LIBRARY OF MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY WOODS HOLE, MASS. LOANED BY AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY t The Annals OF Scottish Natural History A QUARTERLY MAGAZINE \V1TH WHICH IS INCORPORATED CIjc Naturalist EDITED BY ]. A. HARV IE-BROWN, F.R.S.E., F.Z.S. MEMBER OF THE BRITISH ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION JAMES W. H. TRAIL, M.A., M.D., F.R.S., F.L.S. PROFESSOR OF BOTANY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN AND WILLIAM EAGLE CLARKE, F.L.S., MEM. BRIT. ORN. UNION NATURAL HISTORY DEPARTMENT, Ml'SEUM OF SCIENCE AND ART, EDINBURGH IQOO EDINBURGH DAVID DOUGLAS, CASTLE STREET LONDON: R. H. PORTER, 7 PRINCES ST., CAVENDISH SQUARE The Annals of Scottish Natural History NO. 33] 1900 [JANUARY A FEW NOTES ON THE WORKING OF THE WILD BIRDS PROTECTION ACT (1894) By WILLIAM BERRY, B.A., LL.B. THE Wild Birds Protection Act of 1894 has now been in operation within one district of Fifeshire for three complete seasons. Even after such a short period as this, though great results cannot yet be looked for, some distinct effect and are to be seen and it be improvement already ; may interesting, ' such as they are, to have them recorded in the Annals.' The district referred to lies in the north-east of the ' ' and is as the Tentsmuir about a third county, known ; of it has been under the writer's pretty constant supervision since the autumn of I 890. For some time before that this moor, which is naturally very attractive to many species of wild birds, had not been sufficiently watched or protected, and in the absence of this had become a happy hunting- ground for egg-gatherers, who regularly searched it for eggs, and gathered every egg they could find.
    [Show full text]
  • Terry Whitworth 3707 96Th ST E, Tacoma, WA 98446
    Terry Whitworth 3707 96th ST E, Tacoma, WA 98446 Washington State University E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] Published in Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington Vol. 108 (3), 2006, pp 689–725 Websites blowflies.net and birdblowfly.com KEYS TO THE GENERA AND SPECIES OF BLOW FLIES (DIPTERA: CALLIPHORIDAE) OF AMERICA, NORTH OF MEXICO UPDATES AND EDITS AS OF SPRING 2017 Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................... 5 Separating families ....................................................................................................... 10 Key to subfamilies and genera of Calliphoridae ........................................................... 13 See Table 1 for page number for each species Table 1. Species in order they are discussed and comparison of names used in the current paper with names used by Hall (1948). Whitworth (2006) Hall (1948) Page Number Calliphorinae (18 species) .......................................................................................... 16 Bellardia bayeri Onesia townsendi ................................................... 18 Bellardia vulgaris Onesia bisetosa .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire Wildlife Trust
    Cheshire Wildlife Trust Heteroptera and Diptera surveys on the Manchester Mosses with PANTHEON analysis by Phil Brighton 32, Wadeson Way, Croft, Warrington WA3 7JS [email protected] on behalf of Lancashire and Cheshire Wildlife Trusts Version 1.0 September 2018 Lancashire Wildlife Trust Page 1 of 35 Abstract This report describes the results of a series of surveys on the Manchester mosslands covering heteroptera (shield bugs, plant bugs and allies), craneflies, hoverflies, and a number of other fly families. Sites covered are the Holcroft Moss reserve of Cheshire Wildlife Trust and the Astley, Cadishead and Little Woolden Moss reserves of Lancashire Wildlife Trust. A full list is given of the 615 species recorded and their distribution across the four sites. This species list is interpreted in terms of feeding guilds and habitat assemblages using the PANTHEON software developed by Natural England. This shows a strong representation in the sample of species associated with shaded woodland floor and tall sward and scrub. The national assemblage of peatland species is somewhat less well represented, but includes a higher proportion of rare or scarce species. A comparison is also made with PANTHEON results for similar surveys across a similar range of habitats in the Delamere Forest. This suggests that the invertebrate diversity value of the Manchester Mosses is rather less, perhaps as a result of their fragmented geography and proximity to past and present sources of transport and industrial pollution. Introduction The Manchester Mosses comprise several areas of lowland bog or mire embedded in the flat countryside between Warrington and Manchester. They include several areas designated as SSSIs in view of the highly distinctive and nationally important habitat, such as Risley Moss, Holcroft Moss, Bedford Moss, and Astley Moss.
    [Show full text]
  • Jqotes on Tfte Diptera of Somerset
    ; jQotes on tfte Diptera of Somerset 1 Part II. BY H. J. CHARBONNIER. THIS second part of the list includes the Platypezidae, Pipunculidae, Syrphidae, Conopidae and Oes- TRIDAE. The Platypezidae are small insects and appear very scarce in the County ; their larvae, as far as known, feed on fungi. The Piptjnculidae are also small and difficult to find there should be many more species recorded yet, from the County ; their larvae are parasitic in the bodies of Cicadiae. The flies have wonderful powers of hovering flight. The Syrphidae contain the most beautiful of our native flies ; they are all useful or harmless, with only one or two exceptions, and present the most striking instances of mimicry that are to be found in our insect fauna ; whole genera having assumed the form and colouring of Hymenoptera. Colonel Jermyn has been investigating this point ; and I have made a great many notes on Variation in some of the species. In a later number we hope to give some account of our obser- vations in these fascinating problems. The Syrphidae are extremely numerous in species ; 125 are recorded here. Their larvae have varied habits, many feeding on Aphides, and so proving true gardener's friends ; others live in stagnant water or mud ; others in decaying fungi and vegetation, and one or two spend their larval stage in garden bulbs, Narcissi or Onions. L Part I was printed in the Proceedings, Vol, LXI, 189-204. Notes on the Diptera of Somerset. 163 Some species are unaccountably local, occurring only in one particular spot, perhaps only a few yards square ; others are found everywhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Tephritid Flies Recording Scheme June 2020
    TEPHRITID FLIES RECORDING SCHEME JUNE 2020 Since the last note (Bulletin of the Dipterists Forum 84: pp. 8-10), based on data from England, Wales and Scotland, the British Tephritidae Recording Scheme database has continued to grow and a further summary is provided for records ascertained to the end of 2019. COVERAGE 1878 hectads throughout the region. 2 Number of species 1 - 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 1 16 - 20 21 - 25 26 - 30 31 - 35 36 - 40 0 41 - 45 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 DATA For the majority of species the data are presented as the total number of hectads from all date classes (pre 1920 or date unknown, 1920-1939, 1940-1959, 1960-1979, 1980-1999 and 2000-2019) with the numbers in brackets showing ‘new’ hectads during the respective periods. Dithryca guttularis (Meigen, 1826). 178, 21, 10 (10), 2 (2), 11 (10), 93 (85), 71 (50). Myopites eximius Séguy, 1932. 45, 3, 3 (3), 2 (1), 1 (0), 22 (18), 36 (20). Myopites inulaedyssentericae Blot, 1827. 126, 5, 4 (4), 3 (2), 2 (2), 60 (53), 97 (60). Urophora cardui (Linnaeus, 1758). 485, 25, 17 (10), 15 (7), 26 (19), 254 (217), 382 (207). Urophora cuspidata (Meigen, 1826). 40, 0, 2 (2), 2 (2), 3 (2), 19 (18), 22 (16). Urophora jaceana (Hering, 1935). 698, 43, 22 (17), 14 (9), 50 (47), 362 (325), 397 (257). Urophora quadrifasciata (Meigen, 1826). 294, 12, 15 (10), 13 (8), 5 (3), 115 (107), 219 (154). Urophora solstitialis (Linnaeus, 1758).
    [Show full text]
  • A Scanning Electron Microscope Study1
    Türk. entomol. derg., 2018, 42 (2): 109-116 ISSN 1010-6960 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16970/entoted.371182 E-ISSN 2536-491X Original article (Orijinal araştırma) Spermathecae morphology of some Tephritinae (Diptera: Tephritidae) species: A scanning electron microscope study1 Bazı Tephritinae (Diptera: Tephritidae) türlerinin spermateka morfolojisi: Bir taramalı elektron mikroskop çalışması Murat KÜTÜK2* Mehmet YARAN3 Ekrem ASLAN2 Filiz ÖZBAŞ GERÇEKER2 Abstract Spermathecal structure of five species [Campiglossa producta (Loew, 1844), Campiglossa tessellata (Loew, 1844), Euaresta bullans (Wiedemann, 1830), Tephritis formosa (Loew, 1844), Tephritis nigricauda (Loew, 1856)] from subfamily Tephritinae were examined using light and scanning electron microscopy. The specimens were collected between 1999 and 2013 from various provinces of Turkey. Spermathecae were coated in gold/palladium with a Emitech SC 7620 Sputter Coater and examined with a Jeol 6390 LV scanning electron microscope (SEM) operated at 10 kV. Spermathecal structures were characterized as spermathecal bulb, pumping region and spermathecal channel. Descriptions of the spermathecal structures, size of spermathecal bulb, aspect ratio of spermathecal bulb and SEM micrographs of spermathecae are presented for each species. Keywords: SEM, spermathecae, Tephritidae, Tephritinae Öz Tephritinae altfamilyasına ait beş türün [Campiglossa producta (Loew, 1844), Campiglossa tessellata (Loew, 1844), Euaresta bullans (Wiedemann, 1830), Tephritis formosa (Loew, 1844), Tephritis nigricauda (Loew, 1856)] spermateka yapıları ışık ve taramalı elektron mikroskopu (SEM) kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Türler 1999 ve 2013 yılları arasında Türkiye’nin çeşitli illerinden toplanmıştır. Spermateka örneklerine Emitech SC 7620 Sputter Coater ile altın/paladyum kaplaması yapılarak Jeol 6390 LV SEM ile 10 kV’ da incelendi. Spermateka yapıları spermatekal bulb, pompalama bölgesi ve spermateka kanalı olarak karakterize edilmiştir.
    [Show full text]