DOCSLIB.ORG

Great Lakes Region (AGL) Runway Safety Plan, FY 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

COMMITTED TO CONTINUOUSLY IMPROVING SURFACE SAFETY. Great Lakes Region (AGL) Runway Safety Plan FY19 2018-2019 RSC #42 www.faa.gov Executive Summary The Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) top priority is maintaining safety in the National Airspace System (NAS). The Runway Safety Program’s goal is to improve safety by decreasing the number and severity of runway incursions (RI), runway excursions (RE) and serious surface incidents. The FAA’s National Runway Safety Plan (NRSP) outlines the FAA’s strategy to adapt its runway safety efforts through enhanced collection and integrated analysis of data, development of new safety metrics, and leveraged organizational capabilities in support of meeting this goal. In concert with the agency’s stated runway safety goals, the Great Lakes Region (AGL) has developed this Regional Runway Safety Plan (RRSP) to provide a roadmap with regional emphasis for FY2019. The objective of the NRSP is to reduce serious runway safety events by identifying, mitigating and monitoring factors that combine to create risk before serious events occur. This proactive process is defined under the FAA’s Safety Management System (SMS). The AGL RRSP endeavors to align its activities with the principles and components of the SMS to the greatest extent possible. The RRSP also incorporates risk-based decision-making, one of the FAA Administrator’s Strategic Initiatives. REBECCA MACPHERSON MARGIT MCKEE AGL Regional Administrator, Great Lakes Region AGL Runway Safety Program Manager (A), Great Lakes Region TIMOTHY W. SHAVER DENISE KNIGHT Director, Office of Safety Standards, AFS-1 Director, Technical Operations, Central Service Area SUSAN MOWERY-SCHALK DAVID W. WASHINO Director, Airports Division, Great Lakes Region Director, Air Traffic Operations, Central Service Area ANDY ATHCHLEY Director, Central Service Area TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 FAA Safety Management System (SMS) 6 Regional Runway Safety Plan (RRSP) Methodology 7 FY19 RRSP Initiatives 8 1. Safety Assurance 10 2. Safety Risk Management (SRM) 12 3. Safety Policy 14 4. Safety Promotion 4 Great Lakes Region (AGL) Runway Safety Plan FY19 FAA Safety Management System (SMS) The FAA ORDER 8000.369C, Safety A main function of the SMS is to collect and Management System, advances safety analyze relevant data that identifies the factors management by moving toward a process- that constitute acceptable risk. Through oriented safety system approach with an the NRSP, Runway Safety is transitioning to emphasis on risk management and safety assimilate runway safety activities into FAA’s assurance. FAA ORDER 8040.4B, Safety Risk SMS. Management Policy, formalizes the use and The AGL Regional Runway Safety Initiatives are communication of Safety Risk Management grouped according to the FAA’s four pillars of (SRM) across the FAA. Together, these two SMS: Safety Policy, Safety Risk Management, orders define current National Policy for the Safety Assurance, and Safety Promotion. development of the FAA SMS and outline the architecture of the current SMS to align with the Administrator’s Strategic Policies. Great Lakes Region (AGL) Runway Safety Plan FY19 5 FY19-FY20 NRSP Objectives SAFETY ASSURANCE Identify Operating Hazards Program Data Remain the global leader in assuring Voluntary Safety Reporting runway safety enhancement initiatives Investigations are effective in maintaining an Safety Risk Monitoring acceptable level of safety at U.S. airports with an air traffic control Data Analysis tower. Partnership for Safety Audits and Evaluations SAFETY RISK MANAGEMENT Analyze, Assess, Mitigate, and Accept Risk Implement Runway Safety Develop Monitoring Plan Enhancement Initiatives that manage Safety Risk Management or reduce the risk of airport operations. Documents SAFETY POLICY SMS Orders Establish and maintain policies and Safety Guidance procedures to ensure adequate resources are available to accomplish FAA/ATO Safety Orders the FAA’s near-term and strategic SMS Manual objectives. SAFETY PROMOTION Outreach and Eduction Relentlessly promote best practices, Products lessons learned, and actionable Lessons Learned information obtained from data Workshops analysis to our global runway safety stakeholders. Safety Communication 6 Great Lakes Region (AGL) Runway Safety Plan FY19 Regional Runway Safety Plan (RRSP) Methodology To determine the FY2019 AGL priority airports, the poor inspection records, and other factors that Regional Runway Safety Program Manager (RSPM) may contribute to additional surface risk were evaluated surface event data for FY2018 along with also considered in decision-making. Each of the trends from the previous three years for each of AGL Priority Airports has a unique driver behind the airports containing an FAA or Federal Contract the number and type of surface events at that Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT). In addition, location that may indicate an increased “exposure” other criteria such as upcoming construction, to surface risk. AGL Priority Airports AGL Monitored Airports Runway Safety requests support and attendance The RSPM has also identified airports that may from each Regional Governance Council (RGC) line warrant additional attention due to upcoming of business (LOB), either physically or telephonically, construction, changes to airfield operations, or other at the Local Runway Safety Action Team (RSAT) activities that may lead to runway incursions. The meetings at the AGL Priority Airports listed below. RGC intends to monitor these airports, participate in More detail regarding the data and selection of SRM panels, planning meetings and other activities priority airports is located in APPENDIX A. to the extent practical. If runway safety related issues arise during FY2019, the RGC may determine y Minneapolis – St. Paul International, that other measures or on-site activities may be Minneapolis, MN (MSP) warranted at the AGL Monitored Airports listed y Flying Cloud, Minneapolis, MN (FCM) below. More detail regarding the data and selection of monitored airports is located in y Detroit Metro Airport, Detroit, APPENDIX B. MI (DTW) y Grand Forks International, Grand y Cleveland-Hopkins International, Forks, ND (GFK) Cleveland, OH (CLE) y General Mitchell International, y Purdue University Airport, Lafayette, Milwaukee, WI (MKE) IN (LAF) y Oakland County International, Pontiac, y Dane County Regional, Madison, MI (PTK) WI (MSN) y Minneapolis – Crystal Airport, y Chicago Executive Airport, Wheeling, MN (MIC) IL (PWK) y Duluth International, Duluth, MN (DLH) y Terre Haute Regional, Terra Haute, y John Glenn Columbus International, IN (HUF) Columbus, OH (CMH) y La Crosse Regional, La Crosse, WI (LSE) Plan Updates y O’Hare International, Chicago, IL (ORD) This plan covers the runway safety related activities within the current fiscal year (FY2019). However, y Midway International, Chicago, the Runway Safety Governance Council (RSGC) will IL (MDW) monitor additional airports of interest which may y University of Illinois-Willard Airport, not have risen to the level of an AGL Priority Airport Champaign-Urbana, IL (CMI) at the time this plan was developed. This is a living document and the RGC reserves the right to update the plan if deemed necessary. Great Lakes Region (AGL) Runway Safety Plan FY19 7 FY19 Regional Runway Safety Plan Initiatives To support the National Runway Safety Plan national program budget and available personnel. (NRSP) objectives, the AGL RGC has developed The RSPM will monitor progress and coordinate Regional Runway Safety Plan (RRSP) initiatives as any updates to this plan as appropriate throughout outlined in this document. FY2019. This plan will be updated annually by the RSPM, with concurrence from the RSGC. The RSGC will undertake these initiatives during FY2019. No specific completion dates are SMS is a formalized and proactive approach to provided for each activity in this plan, but all are system safety that combines four components expected to be completed by the end of FY2019. to create a systemic approach to managing and The RSPM will work with the Runway Safety ensuring safety. For continuity with the NRSP, the Group within ATO Safety and Technical Training AGL RRSP has aligned its initiatives with these to identify the resources necessary to accomplish four components. these initiatives within the framework of the O ’Hare International Airport, Chicago, IL (ORD) 8 Great Lakes Region (AGL) Runway Safety Plan FY19 1. Safety Assurance O ’Hare International Airport, Chicago, IL (ORD) FY18-FY20 NRSP Safety Assurance Objective: Remain the global leader in assuring Runway Safety enhancement initiatives are effective in maintaining an acceptable level of safety at U.S Airports with an air traffic control tower. Activity 1.1 – Increase Awareness of Action Items: Surface Event Trends 1.1a Runway Safety will process all Great The RSPM will analyze surface events, evaluate Lakes Region surface events for evaluation by performance, identify trends and present the HQ Runway Incursion Assessment Team findings quarterly to the RGC. Runway Safety (RIAT). The RSPM will participate in RIAT will monitor and analyze current performance meetings as necessary to provide more detailed metrics including severity, number and rate information on Great Lakes Region events for of runway incursions. This data will provide the RIAT team’s evaluation. management with information to make informed 1.1b Runway Safety will provide current RI decisions aimed at reducing risk to the NAS and and surface incident (SI) data monthly to RGC also provide
Recommended publications
  • Runway Incursions:1 Adequacy of Ground Movement Safety Systems and of Air Traffic Control (ATC) Procedures

    Runway Incursions:1 Adequacy of Ground Movement Safety Systems and of Air Traffic Control (ATC) Procedures

    RA N S P T O L R A T U R IBU L S U N P N UM A E O T I I T O National Transportation Safety Board A N N S A D FE R T Y B O A Washington, D.C. 20594 Safety Recommendation Date: July 6, 2000 In reply refer to: A-00-66 through -71 Honorable Jane F. Garvey Administrator Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. 20591 In this letter, the National Transportation Safety Board recommends that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) take action to address the following safety issues related to runway incursions:1 adequacy of ground movement safety systems and of air traffic control (ATC) procedures. The Safety Board has issued numerous safety recommendations to the FAA since 1973 to prevent runway incursions and other airport surface incidents. On May 6, 1986, the Board issued a Special Investigation Report, titled “Runway Incursions at Controlled Airports in the United States.”2 In this report, the Board noted that the number of reported near-collision ground incidents had increased significantly and made several new safety recommendations to reduce the frequency of runway incursions. Several of these safety recommendations remained open when a fatal runway collision involving Eastern Airlines flight 111 (EAL111), a Boeing 727 (727), and N44UE, a Beechcraft King Air A100, occurred at Atlanta, Georgia, on January 18, 1990.3 As a result, the Board placed airport runway incursions on its 1990 Most Wanted Transportation Safety Improvements List, and the issue has 1 FAA Order 8020.11A, “Aircraft Accident and Incident Notification, Investigation and Reporting,” defines a runway incursion as “any occurrence at an airport involving an aircraft, vehicle, person, or object on the ground, that creates a collision hazard or results in a loss of separation with an aircraft taking off, intending to take off, landing or intending to land.” 2 Special Investigation Report NTSB/SIR-86/01.
  • Labels Facility Managers

    Labels Facility Managers

    Bruce Visser Kathleen Ryan Norman County/Ada/Twin Valley Airport D00 Aitkin Municipal Airport - Steve Kurtz Field AIT PO Box 9 109 - 1st Ave NW Ada MN 56510 Aitkin MN 56431-1307 Jim Hanson Kreg Anderson Albert Lea Municipal Airport AEL Alexandria Municipal Airport - Chandler Field AXN 73950 - 275th Street 2604 Aga Drive Clarks Grove MN 56016 Alexandria MN 56308 Greg Ruether Bruce Budahn Appleton Municipal Airport AQP Austin Municipal Airport AUM 149 South Munsterman 710 - 21st Street NE Appleton MN 56208 Austin MN 55912 Craig Taylor Bill Masterson Backus Municipal Airport 7Y3 Bagley Municipal Airport 7Y4 1633 24th Ave SW PO Box 178 Backus MN 56435 Bagley MN 56621-0178 Adam Forsberg Karen Weller Baudette International Airport BDE Bemidji Regional Airport BJI 1103 Airport Road NW 3824 Moberg Dr NW, Suite 101 Baudette MN 56623 Bemidji MN 56601 Dan Gens Terry Baird Benson Municipal Airport - Veterans Field BBB Big Falls Municipal Airport 7Y9 1410 Kansas Ave PO Box 196 Benson MN 56215 Big Falls MN 56627 Kevin Hovila Luke Steier Bigfork Municipal Airport FOZ Blue Earth Municipal Airport SBU PO Box 196 7575 Highway 169 Bigfork MN 56628 Blue Earth MN 56013 Kenneth Reichert Steve Wright, Director Bowstring Airport 9Y0 Brainerd Lakes Regional Airport BRD 47703 Nutmeg Road 16384 Airport Road, Suite 5 Deer River MN 56636 Brainerd MN 56401 Dave Bohmer Chris Fredrick Brooten Municipal Airport/John O. Bohmer Field 6D1 Buffalo Municipal Airport CFE 1080 Front Street, Box 400 212 Central Ave Brooten MN 56316 Buffalo MN 55313 Brian Pogodzinski Lucas Milz
  • 2019Annual Report

    2019Annual Report

    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp ANNUAL 2019 REPORT Greetings: While the year 2019 might seem an already distant time in the wake of 2020’s world-changing COVID-19 pandemic, it was a period of tremendous growth in the aviation industry. 0LQQHDSROLV6W3DXO,QWHUQDWLRQDO$LUSRUW 063 HQMR\HGDQRWKHUUHFRUG\HDUVXUSDVVLQJPLOOLRQSDVVHQJHUVIRUWKH¿UVWWLPH International travel reached new heights with new service to Dublin, Mexico City and Seoul. And nearly two dozen new restaurants joined the ranks of MSP’s award-winning concession program. The Metropolitan Airports Commission’s (MAC) reliever airport system also saw an increase in the number of aircraft operations and the number of aircraft based there. Work continued on a multi-year project to expand and modernize Terminal 1’s vintage ticketing and bag claim facilities, and a new 5,000-stall parking ramp took shape in preparation for its 2020 debut. The MAC also began planning and increasing investments in its reliever airports, helping ensure the Twin Cities will continue to enjoy not only the largest, but also we believe the best, airport system in the nation. We’re not alone in holding that opinion. In 2019, for the third consecutive year, Airports Council International named MSP the Best Airport in North America in its size category based on passenger surveys. In short, 2019 was a year of tremendous promise that illustrated the close connection between air transportation and a strong HFRQRP\+LVWRU\KDVVKRZQWKDWDYLDWLRQERWKGULYHVDQGEHQH¿WVIURPHFRQRPLFJURZWK±DQGLWZLOODJDLQZKHQWKHFXUUHQW crisis is behind us.
  • (FCM) Zoning Process: Informing a Mn/DOT Path Forward

    (FCM) Zoning Process: Informing a Mn/DOT Path Forward

    Flying Cloud Airport (FCM) Zoning Process: Informing a Mn/DOT Path Forward A Review of the Flying Cloud Airport (FCM) Joint Airport Zoning Board (JAZB) Process and the Draft Airport Zoning Ordinance B A RPZ RPZ A B C Zone Chad E. Leqve Director of Environment Metropolitan Airports Commission Mn/DOT Airport Zoning Advisory Group Meeting June 12, 2014 Flying Cloud Airport (FCM) Zoning Process Presentation Outline Existing Federal Airspace and Land Use Provisions Why are We Zoning? Goal of the FCM Joint Airport Zoning Board (JAZB) FCM Safety Considerations Economic Impact of Zoning around FCM Proposed Draft FCM Zoning Ordinance Airspace and Land Use Provisions Informing a Mn/DOT Path Forward Flying Cloud Airport (FCM) Zoning Process Runway Safety Zones – Federal Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Federal Guidance: FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13A Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Dimensions Rwy. 18 Rwy. 36 Rwy. 10L Rwy. 28L Rwy. 28R Rwy. 10R Flying Cloud Airport (FCM) Zoning Process Federal Structure Height Restrictions: FAR Part 77 Primary Surface – aligned (longitudinally) with each runway and extends 200 ft from each runway end with a width of 120 ft to 1,000 ft depending on the runway’s classification. Approach Surface – longitudinally centered with the runway and extends beyond the primary surface at a slope and to a distance based on runway classification. Horizontal Surface – horizontal plane 150 ft above the established airport elevation. Constructed by swinging arcs around the end of the primary surface with a radius of either 5,000 ft or 10,000 ft based on the runway’s classification. Conical Surface – 20:1 surface extending 4,000 ft beyond the horizontal surface.
  • National Transportation Safety Board

    National Transportation Safety Board

    National Transportation Safety Board Airport Runway Accidents, Serious Incidents, Recommendations, and Statistics Deadliest Runway Accidents ● Tenerife, Canary Islands, March 27, 1977 (583 fatalities). The world’s deadliest runway accident occurred on March 27, 1977, when Pan Am (PAA) flight 1736, a Boeing 747, and KLM4805, a Boeing 747, collided on runway 12 at Tenerife, Canary Islands, killing 583 passengers and crew. KLM4805 departed runway 12 without a takeoff clearance colliding with PAA1736 that was taxiing on the same runway during instrument meteorological conditions. The Spanish government determined the cause was: “The KLM aircraft had taken off without take-off clearance, in the absolute conviction that this clearance had been obtained, which was the result of a misunderstanding between the tower and the KLM aircraft. This misunderstanding had arisen from the mutual use of usual terminology which, however, gave rise to misinterpretation. In combination with a number of other coinciding circumstances, the premature take-off of the KLM aircraft resulted in a collision with the Pan Am aircraft, because the latter was still on the runway since it had missed the correct intersection.” ● Lexington, Kentucky, August 27, 2006 (49 fatalities). The deadliest runway accident in the United States occurred on August 27, 2006, at about 0606 eastern daylight time when Comair flight 5191, a Bombardier CL-600-2B19, N431CA, crashed during takeoff from Blue Grass Airport, Lexington, Kentucky. The flight crew was instructed to take off from runway 22 but instead lined up the airplane on runway 26 and began the takeoff roll. The airplane ran off the end of the runway and impacted the airport perimeter fence, trees, and terrain.
  • LE SUEUR AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, March 31, 2019 Virtual Meeting 4:30 P.M

    LE SUEUR AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, March 31, 2019 Virtual Meeting 4:30 P.M

    LE SUEUR AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, March 31, 2019 Virtual Meeting 4:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order (Welcome New Members) 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Approval of minutes from December 5, 2019 meeting 4. Projects Update – Silas Parmer A. Property Acquisition B. Taxi-lane Extension C. Taxi-lane Rehabilitation 5. CIP Update – Silas Parmar 6. EDA Partnership – Newell 7. Airport Manager Report 8. Next Meeting: May 28 or June 2 or June 3, 2020 at 4:30 p.m. 9. Adjourn Airport Administration Office 1500 North Commerce St., Le Sueur, MN 56058 Phone (507) 665-9941 • Fax (507) 665-9948 Minutes of the Airport Commission December 5, 2019 Members Present: Scott Schlueter, Jack Roberts, Debra Wilbright and Chairperson Krogmann Members Absent: Darrell Kolden Others Present; Airport & Facilities Manager Andrew Cemenski, Public Services Director Rich Kucera, Silas Parmar, Airport Consultant/Project Manager from Bolton & Menk and Mike Doherty. The Meeting was called to order by Chairperson Krogmann in the Council Chambers at the SRE building at the Airport at 4:30 PM. Approval of Minutes: Motion by Commissioner Schlueter, seconded by Commissioner Roberts to approve the September 5, 2019 minutes with the correction of Commissioner Schlueter and not Commissioner Roberts for meeting with the EDA, all voted in favor. Projects Update – Silas Parmar: Reported by Silas Parmar, Airport Specialist/Project Manager Discussion on the taxilane extension project, taxilane rehabilitation project and T-hanger project. Motion by Commissioner Roberts, seconded by Commissioner Wilbright to recommend to the City Council to rehabilitate the south taxilane project. All voted in favor.
  • Mndot Statewide Airport Economic Study

    Mndot Statewide Airport Economic Study

    MINNESOTA Statewide Airport Economic Impact Study 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TOTAL ANNUAL STATEWIDE ECONOMIC IMPACTS FOR ALL MINNESOTA PUBLIC AIRPORTS STUDY MAC ALL PUBLIC ANNUAL TOTALS AIRPORTS AIRPORTS AIRPORTS Employment 13,147 80,890 94,037 Payroll $570.1 million $3.9 billion $4.4 billion Spending $1.0 billion $12.8 billion $13.8 billion Photo Credit: Emmanuel Canaan Annual Economic Activity $ 1.6 billion $16.6 billion $18.2 billion Note: For more information on the MAC studies, visit metroairports.org. STUDY OVERVIEW ECONOMIC IMPACTS FOR ALL PUBLIC AIRPORTS Minnesota is served by an extensive system of 133 public general aviation and commercial ANNUAL EMPLOYMENT ANNUAL PAYROLL service airports that provide essential transportation links, support aviation 94,037 $4.4 B services, and generate a significant amount of economic activity. Starting in late 2018, the ANNUAL ECONOMIC ANNUAL SPENDING ACTIVITY Minnesota Department of Transportation’s Office of Aeronautics studied 126 of these $13.8 B $18.2 B airports to measure their economic impact on the state economy. Throughout this document these 126 airports are referred to STUDY & MAC AIRPORTS as “study airports.” This map shows the geographic location for study and MAC airports. Economic impact results from studies conducted by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC), for their seven airports in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul Metropolitan Area, are incorporated to provide a comprehensive summary of the annual economic impacts generated by all 133 public airports. Since a similar approach was used to estimate impacts for the MAC airports, the findings from the two separate efforts are combined to produce an overall statewide total, as shown in the table on this page.
  • Manual on the Prevention of Runway Incursions

    Manual on the Prevention of Runway Incursions

    Doc 9870 AN/463 Manual on the Prevention of Runway Incursions Approved by the Secretary General and published under his authority First Edition — 2007 International Civil Aviation Organization Published in separate English, French, Russian and Spanish editions by the International Civil Aviation Organization. All correspondence, except orders and subscriptions, should be addressed to the Secretary General. Orders should be sent to one of the following addresses, together with the appropriate remittance (by bank draft, cheque or money order) in U.S. dollars or the currency of the country in which the order is placed. Credit card orders (American Express, MasterCard and Visa) are accepted at ICAO Headquarters. International Civil Aviation Organization. Attention: Document Sales Unit, 999 University Street, Montréal, Quebec, Canada H3C 5H7 Telephone: +1 514-954-8022; Facsimile: +1 514-954-6769; Sitatex: YULCAYA; E-mail: [email protected]; World Wide Web: http://www.icao.int Cameroon. KnowHow, 1, Rue de la Chambre de Commerce-Bonanjo, B.P. 4676, Douala / Telephone: +237 343 98 42; Facsimile: +237 343 89 25; E-mail: [email protected] China. Glory Master International Limited, Room 434B, Hongshen Trade Centre, 428 Dong Fang Road, Pudong, Shanghai 200120 Telephone: +86 137 0177 4638; Facsimile: +86 21 5888 1629; E-mail: [email protected] Egypt. ICAO Regional Director, Middle East Office, Egyptian Civil Aviation Complex, Cairo Airport Road, Heliopolis, Cairo 11776 Telephone: +20 2 267 4840; Facsimile: +20 2 267 4843; Sitatex: CAICAYA; E-mail: [email protected] Germany. UNO-Verlag GmbH, August-Bebel-Allee 6, 53175 Bonn / Telephone: +49 0 228-94 90 2-0; Facsimile: +49 0 228-94 90 2-22; E-mail: [email protected]; World Wide Web: http://www.uno-verlag.de India.
  • FACT SHEET You May Have Heard

    FACT SHEET You May Have Heard

    MAC GA Final Four Community FACT SHEET You may have heard... The 2019 NCAA Final Four is coming to Minnesota. The event is expected to draw thousands of people to the area and the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) is preparing its airport facilities to accommodate those traveling by air. Many event-goers traveling to and from the Twin Cities will use commercial airline services at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP); many others will use non-commercial aviation services, like those that operate at the MAC’s general aviation airports. Those airports include: • STP: St. Paul Downtown Airport in St. Paul • ANE: Anoka County-Blaine Airport in Blaine • FCM: Flying Cloud Airport in Eden Prairie • MIC: Crystal Airport in Crystal • LVN: Airlake Airport in Lakeville • 21D: Lake Elmo Airport in Lake Elmo The MAC is preparing to meet the increase in demand while ensuring a high level of service and being mindful of neighboring communities. What you can expect... • During the week leading up to the National Championship game and one day after (April 1-9, 2019), MAC expects to have more aircraft taking off and landing than usual at each of its airports. • We anticipate the highest volume of flights to occur from Wednesday, April 3rd through Tuesday, April 9th. • Federal law allows airplanes and helicopters to land and takeoff at any MAC airport any time of day or night. The MAC anticipates • Corporate jets and turboprop aircraft, like the ones arrivals will peak in pictured, will be used more than normal during the hours leading April 6 all hours of the day and night, including the early up to the Semifinal Saturday morning hours and later into the evening.
  • Reducing Runway Incursions: Driving on the Airport FY 2009

    Reducing Runway Incursions: Driving on the Airport FY 2009

    Federal Aviation Administration Situational Awareness Tips MONITOR ATC communications. Easy Steps to Avoid Reducing Runway Runway Incursions: Prior to driving on the airfield: BE PREPARED to vacate the runway or Incursions runway safety area on short notice. Always coordinate with airport manage- Driving on the Airport ment maintenance and repair activity in COMPLETE FAA sponsored web-based DON'T DEVIATE from established access accordance with established policy. FY 2009 runway safety education program at: routes and designated roadways. Don't take www.aopa.org/asf/runway_safety. Certificate shortcuts. awarded upon completion. BE FAMILIAR WITH THE AIRPORT LAYOUT. Keep current airport diagram MINIMIZE distractions such as paperwork, readily available. If you find the diagram is DETERMINE if the airport has a local drivers' food or beverages, cell phones or not current, contact airport management. training program for that airport. If one exists, conversation. complete the training before accessing the Use perimeter roads when possible. airport. USE available memory aids as reminders to operate vehicles safely. COORDINATE access to the airport through Always check NOTAMs/ATIS. the airport manager or operations department. Preventing Incursions and Establish and maintain radio FAMILIARIZE yourself with airport layout Incidents While Operating communications with ATCT when you changes due to construction, maintenance, access the airfield. etc. Know the airport frequency, and plan Vehicles on an Airfield your route ahead of time. Listen carefully,
  • Controller and Pilot Error in Airport Operations: a Review of Previous Research and Analysis of Safety Data

    Controller and Pilot Error in Airport Operations: a Review of Previous Research and Analysis of Safety Data

    Controller and Pilot Error in Airport Operations: A Review of Previous Research and Analysis of Safety Data DOT/FAA/AR-00/51 DOT-VNTSC-FAA-00-21 Office of Aviation Research Washington, DC20591 Kim Cardosi, Ph.D. Alan Yost U.S. Department ofTransportation Research and Special Programs Administration John A. Voipe National Transportation Systems Center Cambridge, MA 02142-1093 Final Report January 2001 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 O U.S. Department ofTransportation Federal Aviation Administration NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 PuMcreporting burden torttnscollection ol information 6 estimated to average 1tourperresponse, mduolrigffw timeforreviewing ensawr^sourceSjMlJier^andmamtainttigirte data neeoWa^amptetirnaxlrenewrathecoDedOTolW SendMrmwrtsreoarSr^fts burden estimate oranyotheri olthiscoQecSon ofinformation, inctuanasuggestionsforr (hisburden, toWashington Headquarters Services, Directorate forInformation Operators andRep^ 1204, Arlmgton, VA 22202-4302, and toBte &$M Ol M and Budaet PapeworgReftrtonProject (0704-01B8). WaslfoSon. PC 20503. _ 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3.REPORTTYPE AND DATES COVERED January 2001 Final Report January 1997 -June 1999 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Controllerand Pilot Errorin AirportOperations: A Review ofPreviousResearch and Analysis of SafetyData FA1L1/A1112 6. AUTHOR(S) Kim Cardosi. Ph.D„ Alan Yost 7.
  • Runway Incursion IFALPA

    Runway Incursion IFALPA

    Runway Incursion IFALPA International Federation of Air Line Pilots’ Associations Runway incursion • Any occurrence at an aerodrome involving the incorrect presence of an aircraft, vehicle or person on the protected area of a surface designated for the landing and take-off of aircraft. • Doc 4444 Procedures for Air Navigation Services Runway Safety • ICAO document 9870, the Runway Incursion Prevention Manual, is based on the Eurocontrol action plan and FAA initiatives, focusing on short and medium term preventive actions. These might be the best achievable at present, but the real solutions lie in designing out the problem which requires a more systemic approach focusing on the future. Runway Safety • IFALPA’s preferred solution is to design airports in such a way that Taxiways crossing runways should be avoided whenever possible, by the construction of “end-around” or “perimeter” taxiways. • When a crossing is unavoidable, it should be done at a low energy point on the runway, at either runway end, entrance Taxiways for a runway shall be restricted to those required for lining up, for take off and shall be perpendicular to that runway. Runway Safety • Many airports were constructed more than 30 years ago, during these years aviation traffic has grown exponentially. Many airports around the world still have the original signs and markings, and they are no longer ICAO compliant. Leaving a pilot to interpret the meaning of these non standard signs and markings is an unnecessary hazard that may lead to a significant safety event. IFALPA considers theuseofnonstandardsignsandmarkingsa threat for its pilots and is requesting their standardization around the globe.