Group members:
Line Henri Nono Ngankou
Martsinouski Kanstantsin
Melis Sofia
Palmieri Arianna
Panayiotou Petros Our task: verify the sensitivity matrix to reject the climate change effects that are not significant for the installation
Our assumption : the installation is located in the Bologna countryside
The sensitivity maxtrix under consideration Air temperature
Energy production can Access to the location Mechanical damage be severely reduced by not really affected is not impacted by Air 10-25% by the heat temperature increase → Medium risk (source : cedgreentech) → High risk → Low risk Rainfall change
Energy production Mechanical damage Two issues: Access to the location Installations prepared - less sunlight cannot be harmed by to resist to rain - cleaning problems due to rainfall change → Low risk drought solar-panel-cleaners.com → Low risk → Medium risk Average wind speed change
Mechanical damage Considering the average Energy production Access to the location speed → Low risk → Low risk → Medium risk Sea level rise
Mechanical damage Energy production Access to the location → Low risk → Low risk → Low risk
Floodings
The presence of Reno, Santerno, Sillaro, Idice, Savena, Samoggia in the region leads to High risk in all categories
Mechanical Energy Access to the damage production location → High risk → High risk → High risk Wild fire
Mechanical Energy Access to damage production the location → High risk → High risk → High risk Air quality
Energy production Mechanical damage Access to the location source: weforum → Low risk → High risk → Low risk From the original matrix to the verified matrix:
→ We reject the following climate change effect of climate on the installation: Our - Rainfall change conclusions: - Average wind speed
- Sea level rise