NVIDIA AI INFERENCE PLATFORM Giant Leaps in Performance and Efficiency for AI Services, from the Data Center to the Network’S Edge Introduction
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
SOL: Effortless Device Support for AI Frameworks Without Source Code Changes
SOL: Effortless Device Support for AI Frameworks without Source Code Changes Nicolas Weber and Felipe Huici NEC Laboratories Europe Abstract—Modern high performance computing clusters heav- State of the Art Proposed with SOL ily rely on accelerators to overcome the limited compute power API (Python, C/C++, …) API (Python, C/C++, …) of CPUs. These supercomputers run various applications from different domains such as simulations, numerical applications or Framework Core Framework Core artificial intelligence (AI). As a result, vendors need to be able to Device Backends SOL efficiently run a wide variety of workloads on their hardware. In the AI domain this is in particular exacerbated by the Fig. 1: Abstraction layers within AI frameworks. existance of a number of popular frameworks (e.g, PyTorch, TensorFlow, etc.) that have no common code base, and can vary lines of code to their scripts in order to enable SOL and its in functionality. The code of these frameworks evolves quickly, hardware support. making it expensive to keep up with all changes and potentially We explore two strategies to integrate new devices into AI forcing developers to go through constant rounds of upstreaming. frameworks using SOL as a middleware, to keep the original In this paper we explore how to provide hardware support in AI frameworks without changing the framework’s source code in AI framework unchanged and still add support to new device order to minimize maintenance overhead. We introduce SOL, an types. The first strategy hides the entire offloading procedure AI acceleration middleware that provides a hardware abstraction from the framework, and the second only injects the necessary layer that allows us to transparently support heterogenous hard- functionality into the framework to enable the execution, but ware. -
Deep Learning Frameworks | NVIDIA Developer
4/10/2017 Deep Learning Frameworks | NVIDIA Developer Deep Learning Frameworks The NVIDIA Deep Learning SDK accelerates widelyused deep learning frameworks such as Caffe, CNTK, TensorFlow, Theano and Torch as well as many other deep learning applications. Choose a deep learning framework from the list below, download the supported version of cuDNN and follow the instructions on the framework page to get started. Caffe is a deep learning framework made with expression, speed, and modularity in mind. Caffe is developed by the Berkeley Vision and Learning Center (BVLC), as well as community contributors and is popular for computer vision. Caffe supports cuDNN v5 for GPU acceleration. Supported interfaces: C, C++, Python, MATLAB, Command line interface Learning Resources Deep learning course: Getting Started with the Caffe Framework Blog: Deep Learning for Computer Vision with Caffe and cuDNN Download Caffe Download cuDNN The Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit —previously known as CNTK— is a unified deeplearning toolkit from Microsoft Research that makes it easy to train and combine popular model types across multiple GPUs and servers. Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit implements highly efficient CNN and RNN training for speech, image and text data. Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit supports cuDNN v5.1 for GPU acceleration. Supported interfaces: Python, C++, C# and Command line interface Download CNTK Download cuDNN TensorFlow is a software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs, developed by Google’s Machine Intelligence research organization. TensorFlow supports cuDNN v5.1 for GPU acceleration. Supported interfaces: C++, Python Download TensorFlow Download cuDNN https://developer.nvidia.com/deeplearningframeworks 1/3 4/10/2017 Deep Learning Frameworks | NVIDIA Developer Theano is a math expression compiler that efficiently defines, optimizes, and evaluates mathematical expressions involving multidimensional arrays. -
1 Amazon Sagemaker
1 Amazon SageMaker 13:45~14:30 Amazon SageMaker 14:30~15:15 Amazon SageMaker re:Invent 15:15~15:45 Q&A | 15:45~17:00 Amazon SageMaker 20 SmartNews Data Scientist, Meng Lee Sagemaker SageMaker - FiNC FiNC Technologies SIGNATE Amazon SageMaker SIGNATE CTO 17:00~17:15© 2018, Amazon Web Services, Inc. or itsQ&A Affiliates. All rights reserved. Amazon Confidential and Trademark Amazon SageMaker Makoto Shimura, Solutions Architect 2019/01/15 © 2018, Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its Affiliates. All rights reserved. Amazon Confidential and Trademark • • • • ⎼ Amazon Athena ⎼ AWS Glue ⎼ Amazon SageMaker © 2018, Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its Affiliates. All rights reserved. Amazon Confidential and Trademark • • Amazon SageMaker • Amazon SageMasker • SageMaker SDK • [ | | ] • Amazon SageMaker • © 2018, Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its Affiliates. All rights reserved. Amazon Confidential and Trademark © 2018, Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its Affiliates. All rights reserved. Amazon Confidential and Trademark 開発 学習 推論推論 学習に使うコードを記述 大量の GPU 大量のCPU や GPU 小規模データで動作確認 大規模データの処理 継続的なデプロイ 試行錯誤の繰り返し 様々なデバイスで動作 © 2018, Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its Affiliates. All rights reserved. Amazon Confidential and Trademark 開発 学習 推論推論 エンジニアがプロダク データサイエンティストが開発環境で作業 ション環境に構築 開発と学習を同じ 1 台のインスタンスで実施 API サーバにデプロイ Deep Learning であれば GPU インスタンスを使用 エッジデバイスで動作 © 2018, Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its Affiliates. All rights reserved. Amazon Confidential and Trademark & • 開発 学習 推論推論 • エンジニアがプロダク データサイエンティストが開発環境で作業 • ション環境に構築 開発と学習を同じ 1 台のインスタンスで実施 API サーバにデプロイ • Deep Learning であれば GPU インスタンスを使用 エッジデバイスで動作 • API • • © 2018, Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its Affiliates. All rights reserved. Amazon Confidential and Trademark © 2018, Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its Affiliates. All rights reserved. Amazon Confidential and Trademark Amazon SageMaker © 2018, Amazon Web Services, Inc. -
Intel® Optimized AI Frameworks
Intel® optimized AI frameworks Dr. Fabio Baruffa & Shailen Sobhee Technical Consulting Engineers, Intel IAGS Visit: www.intel.ai/technology Speed up development using open AI software Machine learning Deep learning TOOLKITS App Open source platform for building E2E Analytics & Deep learning inference deployment Open source, scalable, and developers AI applications on Apache Spark* with distributed on CPU/GPU/FPGA/VPU for Caffe*, extensible distributed deep learning TensorFlow*, Keras*, BigDL TensorFlow*, MXNet*, ONNX*, Kaldi* platform built on Kubernetes (BETA) Python R Distributed Intel-optimized Frameworks libraries * • Scikit- • Cart • MlLib (on Spark) * * And more framework Data learn • Random • Mahout optimizations underway • Pandas Forest including PaddlePaddle*, scientists * * • NumPy • e1071 Chainer*, CNTK* & others Intel® Intel® Data Analytics Intel® Math Kernel Library Kernels Distribution Acceleration Library Library for Deep Neural Networks for Python* (Intel® DAAL) (Intel® MKL-DNN) developers Intel distribution High performance machine Open source compiler for deep learning optimized for learning & data analytics Open source DNN functions for model computations optimized for multiple machine learning library CPU / integrated graphics devices (CPU, GPU, NNP) from multiple frameworks (TF, MXNet, ONNX) 2 Visit: www.intel.ai/technology Speed up development using open AI software Machine learning Deep learning TOOLKITS App Open source platform for building E2E Analytics & Deep learning inference deployment Open source, scalable, -
Theano: a Python Framework for Fast Computation of Mathematical Expressions (The Theano Development Team)∗
Theano: A Python framework for fast computation of mathematical expressions (The Theano Development Team)∗ Rami Al-Rfou,6 Guillaume Alain,1 Amjad Almahairi,1 Christof Angermueller,7, 8 Dzmitry Bahdanau,1 Nicolas Ballas,1 Fred´ eric´ Bastien,1 Justin Bayer, Anatoly Belikov,9 Alexander Belopolsky,10 Yoshua Bengio,1, 3 Arnaud Bergeron,1 James Bergstra,1 Valentin Bisson,1 Josh Bleecher Snyder, Nicolas Bouchard,1 Nicolas Boulanger-Lewandowski,1 Xavier Bouthillier,1 Alexandre de Brebisson,´ 1 Olivier Breuleux,1 Pierre-Luc Carrier,1 Kyunghyun Cho,1, 11 Jan Chorowski,1, 12 Paul Christiano,13 Tim Cooijmans,1, 14 Marc-Alexandre Cotˆ e,´ 15 Myriam Cotˆ e,´ 1 Aaron Courville,1, 4 Yann N. Dauphin,1, 16 Olivier Delalleau,1 Julien Demouth,17 Guillaume Desjardins,1, 18 Sander Dieleman,19 Laurent Dinh,1 Melanie´ Ducoffe,1, 20 Vincent Dumoulin,1 Samira Ebrahimi Kahou,1, 2 Dumitru Erhan,1, 21 Ziye Fan,22 Orhan Firat,1, 23 Mathieu Germain,1 Xavier Glorot,1, 18 Ian Goodfellow,1, 24 Matt Graham,25 Caglar Gulcehre,1 Philippe Hamel,1 Iban Harlouchet,1 Jean-Philippe Heng,1, 26 Balazs´ Hidasi,27 Sina Honari,1 Arjun Jain,28 Sebastien´ Jean,1, 11 Kai Jia,29 Mikhail Korobov,30 Vivek Kulkarni,6 Alex Lamb,1 Pascal Lamblin,1 Eric Larsen,1, 31 Cesar´ Laurent,1 Sean Lee,17 Simon Lefrancois,1 Simon Lemieux,1 Nicholas Leonard,´ 1 Zhouhan Lin,1 Jesse A. Livezey,32 Cory Lorenz,33 Jeremiah Lowin, Qianli Ma,34 Pierre-Antoine Manzagol,1 Olivier Mastropietro,1 Robert T. McGibbon,35 Roland Memisevic,1, 4 Bart van Merrienboer,¨ 1 Vincent Michalski,1 Mehdi Mirza,1 Alberto Orlandi, Christopher Pal,1, 2 Razvan Pascanu,1, 18 Mohammad Pezeshki,1 Colin Raffel,36 Daniel Renshaw,25 Matthew Rocklin, Adriana Romero,1 Markus Roth, Peter Sadowski,37 John Salvatier,38 Franc¸ois Savard,1 Jan Schluter,¨ 39 John Schulman,24 Gabriel Schwartz,40 Iulian Vlad Serban,1 Dmitriy Serdyuk,1 Samira Shabanian,1 Etienne´ Simon,1, 41 Sigurd Spieckermann, S. -
20201130 Gcdv V1.0.Pdf
DE LA RECHERCHE À L’INDUSTRIE Architecture evolutions for HPC 30 Novembre 2020 Guillaume Colin de Verdière Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives - www.cea.fr Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives EUROfusion G. Colin de Verdière 30/11/2020 EVOLUTION DRIVER: TECHNOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS . Power wall . Scaling wall . Memory wall . Towards accelerated architectures . SC20 main points Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives EUROfusion G. Colin de Verdière 30/11/2020 2 POWER WALL P: power 푷 = 풄푽ퟐ푭 V: voltage F: frequency . Reduce V o Reuse of embedded technologies . Limit frequencies . More cores . More compute, less logic o SIMD larger o GPU like structure © Karl Rupp https://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2009/08/25/why-p-scales-as-cv2f-is-so-obvious-pt-2-2 Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives EUROfusion G. Colin de Verdière 30/11/2020 3 SCALING WALL FinFET . Moore’s law comes to an end o Probable limit around 3 - 5 nm o Need to design new structure for transistors Carbon nanotube . Limit of circuit size o Yield decrease with the increase of surface • Chiplets will dominate © AMD o Data movement will be the most expensive operation • 1 DFMA = 20 pJ, SRAM access= 50 pJ, DRAM access= 1 nJ (source NVIDIA) 1 nJ = 1000 pJ, Φ Si =110 pm Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives EUROfusion G. Colin de Verdière 30/11/2020 4 MEMORY WALL . Better bandwidth with HBM o DDR5 @ 5200 MT/s 8ch = 0.33 TB/s Thread 1 Thread Thread 2 Thread Thread 3 Thread o HBM2 @ 4 stacks = 1.64 TB/s 4 Thread Skylake: SMT2 . -
Nvidia Tesla P40 Gpu Accelerator
NVIDIA TESLA P40 GPU ACCELERATOR HIGH-PERFORMANCE VIRTUAL GRAPHICS AND COMPUTE NVIDIA redefined visual computing by giving designers, engineers, scientists, and graphic artists the power to take on the biggest visualization challenges with immersive, interactive, photorealistic environments. NVIDIA® Quadro® Virtual Data GPU 1 NVIDIA Pascal GPU Center Workstation (Quadro vDWS) takes advantage of NVIDIA® CUDA Cores 3,840 Tesla® GPUs to deliver virtual workstations from the data center. Memory Size 24 GB GDDR5 H.264 1080p30 streams 24 Architects, engineers, and designers are now liberated from Max vGPU instances 24 (1 GB Profile) their desks and can access applications and data anywhere. vGPU Profiles 1 GB, 2 GB, 3 GB, 4 GB, 6 GB, 8 GB, 12 GB, 24 GB ® ® The NVIDIA Tesla P40 GPU accelerator works with NVIDIA Form Factor PCIe 3.0 Dual Slot Quadro vDWS software and is the first system to combine an (rack servers) Power 250 W enterprise-grade visual computing platform for simulation, Thermal Passive HPC rendering, and design with virtual applications, desktops, and workstations. This gives organizations the freedom to virtualize both complex visualization and compute (CUDA and OpenCL) workloads. The NVIDIA® Tesla® P40 taps into the industry-leading NVIDIA Pascal™ architecture to deliver up to twice the professional graphics performance of the NVIDIA® Tesla® M60 (Refer to Performance Graph). With 24 GB of framebuffer and 24 NVENC encoder sessions, it supports 24 virtual desktops (1 GB profile) or 12 virtual workstations (2 GB profile), providing the best end-user scalability per GPU. This powerful GPU also supports eight different user profiles, so virtual GPU resources can be efficiently provisioned to meet the needs of the user. -
Comparative Study of Deep Learning Software Frameworks
Comparative Study of Deep Learning Software Frameworks Soheil Bahrampour, Naveen Ramakrishnan, Lukas Schott, Mohak Shah Research and Technology Center, Robert Bosch LLC {Soheil.Bahrampour, Naveen.Ramakrishnan, fixed-term.Lukas.Schott, Mohak.Shah}@us.bosch.com ABSTRACT such as dropout and weight decay [2]. As the popular- Deep learning methods have resulted in significant perfor- ity of the deep learning methods have increased over the mance improvements in several application domains and as last few years, several deep learning software frameworks such several software frameworks have been developed to have appeared to enable efficient development and imple- facilitate their implementation. This paper presents a com- mentation of these methods. The list of available frame- parative study of five deep learning frameworks, namely works includes, but is not limited to, Caffe, DeepLearning4J, Caffe, Neon, TensorFlow, Theano, and Torch, on three as- deepmat, Eblearn, Neon, PyLearn, TensorFlow, Theano, pects: extensibility, hardware utilization, and speed. The Torch, etc. Different frameworks try to optimize different as- study is performed on several types of deep learning ar- pects of training or deployment of a deep learning algorithm. chitectures and we evaluate the performance of the above For instance, Caffe emphasises ease of use where standard frameworks when employed on a single machine for both layers can be easily configured without hard-coding while (multi-threaded) CPU and GPU (Nvidia Titan X) settings. Theano provides automatic differentiation capabilities which The speed performance metrics used here include the gradi- facilitates flexibility to modify architecture for research and ent computation time, which is important during the train- development. Several of these frameworks have received ing phase of deep networks, and the forward time, which wide attention from the research community and are well- is important from the deployment perspective of trained developed allowing efficient training of deep networks with networks. -
Comparative Study of Caffe, Neon, Theano, and Torch
Workshop track - ICLR 2016 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CAFFE,NEON,THEANO, AND TORCH FOR DEEP LEARNING Soheil Bahrampour, Naveen Ramakrishnan, Lukas Schott, Mohak Shah Bosch Research and Technology Center fSoheil.Bahrampour,Naveen.Ramakrishnan, fixed-term.Lukas.Schott,[email protected] ABSTRACT Deep learning methods have resulted in significant performance improvements in several application domains and as such several software frameworks have been developed to facilitate their implementation. This paper presents a comparative study of four deep learning frameworks, namely Caffe, Neon, Theano, and Torch, on three aspects: extensibility, hardware utilization, and speed. The study is per- formed on several types of deep learning architectures and we evaluate the per- formance of the above frameworks when employed on a single machine for both (multi-threaded) CPU and GPU (Nvidia Titan X) settings. The speed performance metrics used here include the gradient computation time, which is important dur- ing the training phase of deep networks, and the forward time, which is important from the deployment perspective of trained networks. For convolutional networks, we also report how each of these frameworks support various convolutional algo- rithms and their corresponding performance. From our experiments, we observe that Theano and Torch are the most easily extensible frameworks. We observe that Torch is best suited for any deep architecture on CPU, followed by Theano. It also achieves the best performance on the GPU for large convolutional and fully connected networks, followed closely by Neon. Theano achieves the best perfor- mance on GPU for training and deployment of LSTM networks. Finally Caffe is the easiest for evaluating the performance of standard deep architectures. -
NVIDIA DGX Station the First Personal AI Supercomputer 1.0 Introduction
White Paper NVIDIA DGX Station The First Personal AI Supercomputer 1.0 Introduction.........................................................................................................2 2.0 NVIDIA DGX Station Architecture ........................................................................3 2.1 NVIDIA Tesla V100 ..........................................................................................5 2.2 Second-Generation NVIDIA NVLink™ .............................................................7 2.3 Water-Cooling System for the GPUs ...............................................................7 2.4 GPU and System Memory...............................................................................8 2.5 Other Workstation Components.....................................................................9 3.0 Multi-GPU with NVLink......................................................................................10 3.1 DGX NVLink Network Topology for Efficient Application Scaling..................10 3.2 Scaling Deep Learning Training on NVLink...................................................12 4.0 DGX Station Software Stack for Deep Learning.................................................14 4.1 NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit.....................................................................................16 4.2 NVIDIA Deep Learning SDK ...........................................................................16 4.3 Docker Engine Utility for NVIDIA GPUs.........................................................17 4.4 NVIDIA Container -
The NVIDIA DGX-1 Deep Learning System
NVIDIA DGX-1 ARTIFIcIAL INTELLIGENcE SYSTEM The World’s First AI Supercomputer in a Box Get faster training, larger models, and more accurate results from deep learning with the NVIDIA® DGX-1™. This is the world’s first purpose-built system for deep learning and AI-accelerated analytics, with performance equal to 250 conventional servers. It comes fully integrated with hardware, deep learning software, development tools, and accelerated analytics applications. Immediately shorten SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS data processing time, visualize more data, accelerate deep learning frameworks, GPUs 8x Tesla P100 and design more sophisticated neural networks. TFLOPS (GPU FP16 / 170/3 CPU FP32) Iterate and Innovate Faster GPU Memory 16 GB per GPU CPU Dual 20-core Intel® Xeon® High-performance training accelerates your productivity giving you faster insight E5-2698 v4 2.2 GHz NVIDIA CUDA® Cores 28672 and time to market. System Memory 512 GB 2133 MHz DDR4 Storage 4x 1.92 TB SSD RAID 0 NVIDIA DGX-1 Delivers 58X Faster Training Network Dual 10 GbE, 4 IB EDR Software Ubuntu Server Linux OS DGX-1 Recommended GPU NVIDIA DX-1 23 Hours, less than 1 day Driver PU-Only Server 1310 Hours (5458 Days) System Weight 134 lbs 0 10X 20X 30X 40X 50X 60X System Dimensions 866 D x 444 W x 131 H (mm) Relatve Performance (Based on Tme to Tran) Packing Dimensions 1180 D x 730 W x 284 H (mm) affe benchmark wth V-D network, tranng 128M mages wth 70 epochs | PU servers uses 2x Xeon E5-2699v4 PUs Maximum Power 3200W Requirements Operating Temperature 10 - 30°C NVIDIA DGX-1 Delivers 34X More Performance Range NVIDIA DX-1 170 TFLOPS PU-Only Server 5 TFLOPS 0 10 50 100 150 170 Performance n teraFLOPS PU s dual socket Intel Xeon E5-2699v4 170TF s half precson or FP16 DGX-1 | DATA SHEET | DEc16 computing for Infinite Opportunities NVIDIA DGX-1 Software Stack The NVIDIA DGX-1 is the first system built with DEEP LEARNING FRAMEWORKS NVIDIA Pascal™-powered Tesla® P100 accelerators. -
NVIDIA Ampere GA102 GPU Architecture Whitepaper
NVIDIA AMPERE GA102 GPU ARCHITECTURE Second-Generation RTX Updated with NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA A40 Information V2.0 Table of Contents Introduction 5 GA102 Key Features 7 2x FP32 Processing 7 Second-Generation RT Core 7 Third-Generation Tensor Cores 8 GDDR6X and GDDR6 Memory 8 Third-Generation NVLink® 8 PCIe Gen 4 9 Ampere GPU Architecture In-Depth 10 GPC, TPC, and SM High-Level Architecture 10 ROP Optimizations 11 GA10x SM Architecture 11 2x FP32 Throughput 12 Larger and Faster Unified Shared Memory and L1 Data Cache 13 Performance Per Watt 16 Second-Generation Ray Tracing Engine in GA10x GPUs 17 Ampere Architecture RTX Processors in Action 19 GA10x GPU Hardware Acceleration for Ray-Traced Motion Blur 20 Third-Generation Tensor Cores in GA10x GPUs 24 Comparison of Turing vs GA10x GPU Tensor Cores 24 NVIDIA Ampere Architecture Tensor Cores Support New DL Data Types 26 Fine-Grained Structured Sparsity 26 NVIDIA DLSS 8K 28 GDDR6X Memory 30 RTX IO 32 Introducing NVIDIA RTX IO 33 How NVIDIA RTX IO Works 34 Display and Video Engine 38 DisplayPort 1.4a with DSC 1.2a 38 HDMI 2.1 with DSC 1.2a 38 Fifth Generation NVDEC - Hardware-Accelerated Video Decoding 39 AV1 Hardware Decode 40 Seventh Generation NVENC - Hardware-Accelerated Video Encoding 40 NVIDIA Ampere GA102 GPU Architecture ii Conclusion 42 Appendix A - Additional GeForce GA10x GPU Specifications 44 GeForce RTX 3090 44 GeForce RTX 3070 46 Appendix B - New Memory Error Detection and Replay (EDR) Technology 49 Appendix C - RTX A6000 GPU Perf ormance 50 List of Figures Figure 1.