DOCSLIB.ORG

Santa Ana Sucker Conservation Team

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Who is SAWPA? SAWPA Regional Planning Efforts Santa Ana Middle Santa Ana River Watershed TMDL Task Force SAWPA is a Watershed Agency Focused on Emerging Constituents Task Force Sucker Basin Monitoring Program Task Force Regional Water Issues Conserva�on Team Regional Water Quality Monitoring Task Force Formed originally in 1968 as a planning agency, the SANTA ANA SUCKER One Water One Watershed Program Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) was Santa Ana Sucker Conservation Team CONSERVATION TEAM created to help resolve interagency conflicts and address Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force A group of public agencies dedicated to the recovery of the regional water issues in the Santa Ana River watershed. Forest First Santa Ana sucker in the Santa Ana River Watershed SAWPA tackles issues related to water supply reliability, WECAN water quality improvement, recycled water, wastewater Arundo Habitat Management treatment, groundwater management, and brine disposal. Lake Elsinore & San Jacinto Watersheds Authority SAWPA’s Role SAWPA Member Agencies What is the Santa Ana Sucker What are the goals of the Team? SAWPA Administers Multi-Agency Task Forces Conservation Team? Protect and Increase the Population and SAWPA serves as an administrator for several Task The Santa Ana Sucker Conservation Team, formed Range of Santa Ana Sucker Forces within the watershed through meeting facilitation, in 1998, is a task force of public agencies led by the The Santa Ana sucker was listed as a threatened species contract service administration, and Task Force Agreement Orange County Water District, City of Riverside, and in 2000 under the federal Endangered Species Act. Even coordination. Through collaborative processes, SAWPA Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA), before the species was listed, the Team has worked together creates value by building relationships among regulators, and includes many other local water agencies, to understand the distribution of sucker in the watershed SAWPA members, and regulated parties that allow for stormwater management agencies, regulatory and the reasons for their decline in order to create effective economies of scale, reduced costs, or increased benefits agencies and non-profits in the watershed. The recovery programs. Over the last 20 years, the Team has in addressing water related issues; provides regional Team’s goal is to determine the reasons for the conducted: capacity and neutral venue for supporting multi-agency decline of the Santa Ana sucker (Catostomus • Habitat protection projects and programs forum(s) to address the water resources challenges santaanae) in the Santa Ana River Watershed and • Education and outreach in the Santa Ana River Watershed; and assists in the devise strategies for the recovery of the species. • Surveys to monitor fish status, and assessment of habitat establishment and on-going facilitation of stakeholder conditions processes to address watershed-specific issues. • Research to increase understanding of fish population and What is the Santa Ana sucker? range in the watershed SAWPA Supports its Member Agencies and The Santa Ana sucker is a small freshwater fish that Other Organizations with Water Planning can be found in the Santa Ana River, Los Angeles River, The Santa Ana sucker is SAWPA is a Joint Powers Authority of five member Learn More and Contact Information Santa Clara River, and San Gabriel River basins. Their one of only a few native freshwater fish species agencies that supports water resources planning: Eastern For the latest information on the Santa Ana sucker preferred habitat contains a mixture of sand, cobble currently in existence in Municipal Water District, Inland Empire Utilities Agency, Conservation Team, please visit: and gravel. Orange County Water District, San Bernardino Valley southern California. Municipal Water District, and Western Municipal Water www.sawpa.org/sawpa.org/ Why are they threatened? District. SAWPA seeks to create and facilitate partnerships task-forces/santa-ana-sucker- According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's 2014 with and between organizations pursuing shared interests Desktop Santa Ana Recovery Plan, “The primary threat to the conservation-team/ “ The [native] fish inthe Santa Ana River are probably smaller and overall watershed sustainability. Our regional leader- Santa Ana sucker includes past and ongoing habitat in size and less healthy than they would otherwise be if they ship provides a model of collaboration and cooperation loss through hydrological modifications throughout were living in more natural surroundings in the mountains.” utilizing integrated solutions. SAWPA’s Mission is to: Contact Ian Achimore at the range of the species.” —Heather Dyer, General Manager, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District • Facilitate communication • Implement programs envelope [email protected] • Identify emerging • Build projects opportunities • Operate and maintain Successes to Date • Develop regional plans facilities Key Outcomes: Teaming Up to Protect the Sucker • Secure funding Santa Ana GRANT FUNDING SUCKER RECOVERY The Santa Ana Sucker Conservation Team is one of our success stories – additional information about SAWPA Sucker Together, the Team is eligible to Team projects implemented in the programs can be found at www.sawpa.org. receive grant funding unavailable to Watershed improve suitable habitat Conservation Team regulated entities. Through 2018, it and contribute to recovery of the has received over $100,000 in State Santa Ana sucker species. and federal funding. Task Force Project Partnerships Santa Ana Riverwalk 6 Sucker Habitat Project Funding Partners Work- The Santa Ana Riverwalk is an annual aquatic habitat ing Together with Local Agencies and Non-Profits survey within the Santa Ana River. Volunteers organize SAWPA, Orange County Water District, City of Riverside into groups and collectively walk an 18-mile stretch combined their funding with grants from Santa Ana Regional of river to sample 100 GPS identified locations. The Water Quality Control Board and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service purpose of the walk is to assess the quality of the river to implement key habitat restoration efforts for the sucker. bottom for fish habitat. At each location, volunteers 1 assess the makeup of the river bottom in addition to HABITAT RESTORATION measuring the width of the channel, maximum depth, PROJECT and percent vegetation on the stream banks. This effort has informed water agencies and the public of the River’s conditions and helped identify river segments that would benefit from habitat improvement projects. 4 book book (Above) The Santa Ana Riverwalk has STUDIES surveyed 100 points along an 18-mile FOCUSED ON THE book book stretch of river annually since 2006. SANTA ANA SUCKER gavel (Left) Volunteers measure the width of Regulatory the River at each location during the Agencies last Riverwalk. Over 400 volunteers building have participated since 2006. Water Agencies hand-holding-seedling 11 Non-Profits YEARS OF POPULATION binoculars MONITORING Habitat Restoration Project Highlight Team Successes Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection and Fish Population Surveys and Related Studies Beneficial Use Enhancement Project Beginning in 1999, the Team has pooled resources to fund SAWPA and partner Orange County Water District local studies focused on population levels and habitat constructed the Santa Ana Sucker Habitat Protection 14 quality in the Santa Ana River Watershed. In 2001, the and Beneficial Use Enhancement Project in October ANNUAL Team investigated migration patterns, exotic fish preda- clipboard-check 2018. A 15-foot rock groin, a hydraulic structure often HABITAT tion and the significance of the Santa Ana River’s tributar- used for flood control purposes, was installed near SURVEYS ies to the species long-term survival. Building on the initial the City of Riverside. In order to create suitable rocky studies, the Team investigated the feasibility of Santa Ana Rendering of the 15-ft partially submerged rock groin with bottom habitat, the Project created localized erosion to sucker recovery. They outlined a long-term Conservation upstream and downstream boulder clusters to create nearly expose existing gravel beds and cobbles, the preferred Program based on the best available scientific information 500 square feet of rocky bottom aquatic species habitat. habitat of the Sucker. and utilized adaptive management techniques. Partnerships with Law Enforcement This Project provides habitat for aquatic species at a range of water depths to accommodate the frequently The Team has partnered with law enforcement, such as changing depth of the Santa Ana River. In addition the City of Colton Police Department, to implement addi- to creating habitat for a threatened species, this tional off highway vehicle patrols to protect prime Santa Project provides useful information to agencies like Ana sucker habitat in the mainstem of the Santa Ana River. the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Financial assistance by the Team has allowed law enforce- who are leading the construction of aquatic species ment to enforce local codes and ordinances on holiday habitat projects per the Upper Santa Ana River Habitat weekends beginning in 2015. After 1 year of enforcement, Conservation Plan. there was a 30% decrease in education contacts and The installed Project post construction in October 2018. Off-road vehicle trespassing is still an 45% decrease in enforcement contacts, demonstrating the issue
Recommended publications
  • Glendale Narrows

    Glendale Narrows

    Vegetation Activity Wildlife Viewing Wildlife Native Equestrian Signage Greenway Access Greenway Management Management and insects. and Interpretive Interpretive River LA Stormwater Stormwater birds, mammals, mammals, birds, Elysian Valley path. Los Angeles River Map and Guide attract plants native storage; activities, and a bike bike a and activities, water underground natural the vegetation, equestrian equestrian vegetation, Metro Stop River & Kayaking Exit adventures: River replenishes and stormwater signage, natural natural signage, Public Art Bicycle Access your for points starting few a are Marsh St. A 3.9-acre park filters filters park 3.9-acre A St. Marsh features interpretive interpretive features Here Here fish. jumping even and birdlife, Recreation Zone Class I, II/III Bike Path 2960 and Bikeway River Davis Picnic Area, Area, Picnic Davis * abundant vegetation, of plenty see North L.A. from accessed also park, next to the Bette Bette the to next park, r to stretch this throughout location e h is Park St. Gleneden c 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 mi linear This Glendale Visit any any Visit t 2 River. natural-bottom le S F This map is intended for recreational use only. Information displayed is 2944 and St. Rosanna 1300 Garden Street in in Street Garden 1300 a derived from sources deemed reliable; however, accuracy is not guarenteed. scenic, a is result The harden. to n Published in July 2014. 2999 at entrances lot F the concrete along the riverbed riverbed the along concrete the e walk: river r n Parking Marsh Park: Marsh stretch making it impossible for for impossible it making stretch a narrows Glendale n d The Mountains Recreation and o Conservation Authority (MRCA), seven-mile this throughout up Marsh Park bubble springs Freshwater drain.
  • Los Angeles River Jurisdictional Determination Special Case Cover

    Los Angeles River Jurisdictional Determination Special Case Cover

    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105·3901 JUL 6 2010 OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR Colonel Mark Toy District Engineer, Los Angeles District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 532711 Los Ange les, California 90053-2325 Dear Colonel Toy: This letter transmits the Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdictional determination for the Los Angeles River. On August 17, 2008, EPA's Assistant Administrator for Water designated the Los Angeles River as a "Special Case" as defined by the EPA-Corps 1989 Memorandum ofAgreement (MOA) regarding coordination on matters ofgeographic jurisdiction. Pursuant to the MOA, designation ofthe "Special Case" made EPA responsib le for determining the extent to which the Los Angeles River was protected as a "water ofthe United States." Specifically, EPA analyzed the river's status as a "Traditional Navigable Water," one ofseveral categories ofjurisdictional waters under the Act. We conclude that the mainstem ofthe Los Angeles River is a "Traditional Navigable Water" from its origins at the confluence of Arroyo Calabasas and Bell Creek to San Pedro Bay at the Pacific Ocean, a distance of approximately 51 miles . In reaching this conclusion, Region 9 and Headquarters staffconsidered a number offactors, including the ability ofthe Los Angeles River under current conditions offlow and depth to support navigation by watercraft; the history ofnavigation by watercraft on the river; the current commercial and recreational uses of the river; and plans for future
  • UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Macroparasite Study of Cypriniform fishes in the Santa Clara Drainage Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3kp0q16j Author Murray, Max DeLonais Publication Date 2019 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Macroparasite Study of Cypriniform fishes in the Santa Clara Drainage A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Biology by Max DeLonais Murray 2019 © Copyrite by Max DeLonais Murray 2019 ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS Macroparasite Study of Cypriniform fishes in the Santa Clara Drainage by Max DeLonais Murray Master of Science in Biology University of California, Los Angeles, 2019 Professor Donald G. Buth, Chair Several species of fishes have been introduced into the Santa Clara River system in southern California, including Catostomus santaanae (Santa Ana sucker), Catostomus fumeiventris (Owens sucker), Gila orcutti (arroyo chub), and Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow). These species are known to inhabit similar ecological niches but little is known about their associated parasite fauna. Two C. fumeiventris, 35 C. santaanae, 63 hybrid catostomids, 214 G. orcutti, and 18 P. promelas were collected and necropsied in the summers of 2017 and 2018. Nine macroparasite taxa were harvested including seven native, and two nonnative parasites Schyzocotyle acheilognathi (Asian fish tapeworm) and Lernaea cyprinacea (anchor worm). Prevalence and intensity of parasites were not related to the genetic history of these catostomids. This is the first host-association record for G. orcutti with Gyrodactylus sp., S. acheilognathi, ii diplostomid metacercariae, Rhabdochona sp, Contracaecum sp., and larval acuariid cysts and for P.
  • Target Species Mapping for the Green Visions Plan

    Target Species Mapping for the Green Visions Plan

    Target Species Habitat Mapping California Quail and Mountain Quail (Callipepla californica and Oreortyx pictus) Family: Phasianidae Order: Galliformes Class: Aves WHR #: B140 and B141 Distribution: California quail are found in southern Oregon, northern Nevada, California, and Baja California, and have been introduced in other states such as Hawaii, Washington, Idaho, Colorado, and Utah (Peterson 1961). In California, they are widespread but absent from the higher elevations of the Sierra Nevada, the Cascades, the White Mountains, and the Warner Mountains, and are replaced by the related Gambel’s quail (C. gambelii) in some desert regions (Peterson 1961, Small 1994). In southern California, they are found from the Coast Range south to the Mexican border, and occur as far east as the western fringes of the Mojave and Sonoran deserts, such as in the Antelope Valley (Garrett and Dunn 1981, Small 1994). California quail range from sea level to about 5000 ft (1524 meters; Stephenson and Calcarone 1999) Mountain quail are resident from northern Washington and northern Idaho, south through parts of Oregon, northwestern Nevada, California, and northern Baja California (Peterson 1961). In southern California, mountain quail are found in nearly all of the mountain ranges west of the deserts, including the southern Coast Ranges, from the Santa Lucia Mountains south through Santa Barbara and Ventura counties, and the Peninsular Ranges south to the Mexican border (Garrot and Dunn 1981, Small 1994). In the Transverse Ranges, a small population occurs in the western Santa Monica Mountains, and larger populations occur in the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains (Small 1994). Mountain quail are found at elevations from below 2000 ft (610 meters) to over 9000 ft (2743 meters; Stephenson and Calcarone 1999).
  • Fishes As a Template for Reticulate Evolution

    Fishes As a Template for Reticulate Evolution

    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 12-2016 Fishes as a Template for Reticulate Evolution: A Case Study Involving Catostomus in the Colorado River Basin of Western North America Max Russell Bangs University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Evolution Commons, Molecular Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Bangs, Max Russell, "Fishes as a Template for Reticulate Evolution: A Case Study Involving Catostomus in the Colorado River Basin of Western North America" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 1847. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1847 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Fishes as a Template for Reticulate Evolution: A Case Study Involving Catostomus in the Colorado River Basin of Western North America A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology by Max Russell Bangs University of South Carolina Bachelor of Science in Biological Sciences, 2009 University of South Carolina Master of Science in Integrative Biology, 2011 December 2016 University of Arkansas This dissertation is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. _____________________________________ Dr. Michael E. Douglas Dissertation Director _____________________________________ ____________________________________ Dr. Marlis R. Douglas Dr. Andrew J. Alverson Dissertation Co-Director Committee Member _____________________________________ Dr. Thomas F. Turner Ex-Officio Member Abstract Hybridization is neither simplistic nor phylogenetically constrained, and post hoc introgression can have profound evolutionary effects.
  • Letter to Donna Downing and Andrew Hanson from the City of San Juan

    Letter to Donna Downing and Andrew Hanson from the City of San Juan

    32400 PASEO ADELANTO MEMBERS OF The CITY COUNCIL SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA 92675 (949) 493-1171 SERGIO FARIAS (949) 493-1053 FAX KERRY K. FERGUSON www.sanjuancapistrano.org BRIAN L. MARYOTT PAM PATTERSON, ESQ. DEREK REEVE June 19, 2017 Via Electronic Mail Donna Downing Jurisdiction Team Leader, Wetlands Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20460 [email protected] Andrew Hanson Federalism Consultation Lead U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20460 [email protected] RE: COMMENTS ON FEDERALISM CONSULTATION REGARDING THE DEFINITION OF "WATERS OF UNITED STATES" Dear Ms. Downing and Mr. Hanson: The City of San Juan Capistrano ("City") is a municipal corporation located in Orange County, California. The City is home to approximately 34,000 people and is 14.65 square miles. The City is located adjacent to San Juan Creek, a designated Water of the United States. The City operates a municipal separate storm sewer system ("MS4") as well as a water utility. Page 1 of 14 61073.00100\29883715.1 San Juan Capistrano: Preserving the Past to Enhance the Future Printed on 100% recycled paper The City submits this letter to EPA pursuant to Executive Order (EO) 13132. EO 13132 requires EPA to consult with local government agencies (or their representative national organizations) prior to issuing any regulation that may impose substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments or preempt state or local law. EPA has proposed rescinding and revising the definition of the term "Waters of the United States" ("WOTUS") for the purposes of the federal Clean Water Act.
  • Microsoft Outlook

    Microsoft Outlook

    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
  • Water Supply and Habitat Resiliency for a Future Los Angeles River: Site-Specific Natural Enhancement Opportunities Informed by River Flow and Watershed-Wide Action

    Water Supply and Habitat Resiliency for a Future Los Angeles River: Site-Specific Natural Enhancement Opportunities Informed by River Flow and Watershed-Wide Action

    Water Supply and Habitat Resiliency for a Future Los Angeles River: Site-Specific Natural Enhancement Opportunities Informed by River Flow and Watershed-Wide Action Los Feliz to Taylor Yard Funded by a Grant from the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy December 2016 Los Feliz Blvd to Taylor Yard Los Angeles River Habitat Enhancement Study and Opportunities Assessment The Nature Conservancy’s Urban Conservation Program Team that includes Brian Cohen (Conservation Analyst), Shona Ganguly (External Affairs Manager), Sophie Parker, Ph.D. (Senior Scientist), John Randall (Lead Scientist), Jill Sourial (Urban Conservation Program Director), and Lara Weatherly (Intern) led the process to create this report. Land IQ conducted surveys and analysis on behalf of The Nature Conservancy with the support of the Natural History Museum, WRC Consulting, Travis Longcore at the University of Southern California, and Connective Issue. When referring to this study, cite The Nature Conservancy’s Urban Conservation Program. Contributors Chapter 1: Introduction Travis Brooks and Margot Griswold (Land IQ); Krista Sloniowski (Connective Issue) Chapter 2: Historical Ecology of the Los Angeles River Riparian Zone in the Elysian Valley Travis Longcore (University of Southern California, School of Architecture and Spatial Sciences Institute) Chapter 3: Hydrology and Hydraulics Travis Brooks (Land IQ); Lan Weber (WRC Consulting) Chapter 4: Biota of the Los Angeles River in the Elysian Valley 4.1 Introduction: Travis Brooks, Margot Griswold, and Melissa Riedel-Lehrke (Land IQ); Brian V. Brown, James P. Dines, Kimball L. Garrett, Lisa Gonzalez, Bennett Hardy, Stevie Kennedy-Gold, Miguel Ordeñana, Gregory B. Pauly (Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County) 4.2 Vegetation Communities: Travis Brooks, Margot Griswold, and Melissa Riedel-Lehrke (Land IQ) 4.3 Fish Fauna Review: Margot Griswold (Land IQ) 4.4 Insect Fauna: Brian V.
  • San Juan Creek Ocean Outfall Junction Structure Rehabilitation Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration

    San Juan Creek Ocean Outfall Junction Structure Rehabilitation Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration

    San Juan Creek Ocean Outfall Junction Structure Rehabilitation Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared by: South Orange County Wastewater Authority 34156 Del Obispo Street, Dana Point, CA 92629 Contact: Janie Chen SEPTEMBER 2015 Initial Study and San Juan Creek Ocean Outfall Junction Structure Mitigated Negative Declaration Rehabilitation Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 California Environmental Quality Act Compliance ............................................................ 2 1.2 Project Planning Setting ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Public Review Process ........................................................................................................ 2 2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ....................................................................... 3 2.2 Environmental Determination ............................................................................................. 3 3 INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST .................................................................................................. 5 3.1 Aesthetics .........................................................................................................................
  • Prado Basin Sediment Management Demonstration Project Biological Conditions Technical Report

    Prado Basin Sediment Management Demonstration Project Biological Conditions Technical Report

    PRADO BASIN SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT DEMONSTRATION PROJECT BIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS TECHNICAL REPORT Prepared By Orange County Water District 18700 Ward Street Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Contact: Richard Zembal Daniel Bott July 2013 Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................1-1 2.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ................................................................ 2-1 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Regional Setting ................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Local Setting ......................................................................................... 3-3 3.3 Relevant Biological Resource Management Programs ......................... 3-8 4.0 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................4-1 4.1 Methodology ......................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Vegetation Communities ....................................................................... 4-3 4.3 Sensitive Communities/Special Status Plants ..................................... 4-11 4.4 Wildlife ................................................................................................4-19 4.5 Wildlife Movement Corridors ............................................................... 4-51 5.0 SUMMARY OF BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES .......................................... 5-1 6.0
  • Los Angeles River Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study DRAFT

    Los Angeles River Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study DRAFT

    US Army Corps of Engineers® Los Angeles District Los Angeles River Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study DRAFT – APPENDIX D GEOTECHNICAL, INCLUDING HTRW September 2013 Los Angeles District Geotechnical Branch DRAFT Geotechnical Feasibility Report Los Angeles River Ecosystem Restoration Study Project Area, Los Angeles County, CA 2013 Geotechnical Feasibility Report Los Angeles River Ecosystem Study Project Area TABLE of CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Context ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Los Angeles River Description and General History ..................................................................... 1 1.3 Scope of Work .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.0 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 Proposed Improvements and Alternatives ................................................................................... 3 2.2 Considered Improvements ........................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Tentatively Selected Plan .............................................................................................................
  • Urban Waters Federal Partnership Works to Restore and Increase Access to the Los Angeles River

    Urban Waters Federal Partnership Works to Restore and Increase Access to the Los Angeles River

    Urban Waters Federal Partnership Works to Restore and Increase Access to the Los Angeles River The Urban Waters Federal Partnership has Efforts to restore the LA River began in the 1980’s with activists and environmentalists. The movement slowly grew to include nonprofit developed a plan with multiple federal, state, organizations and city governments. The Urban Waters Federal Partnership, and local partners to restore and revitalize the started in 2011, has provided a formal, coordinated effort to restore the river. Cities along the entire length of the river have seen the benefits of partnership Los Angeles (LA) River watershed. Eight federal projects with improved green space and water quality. agencies, four cities, LA County, and the State of Project Highlights California government work in conjunction with The Urban Waters Federal Partnership is: local organizations to bring together unique views • Restoring the LA River to its natural state and promoting recreational activities. and conduct projects in the watershed. The LA • Attracting students and youth to the river. River begins in the Santa Monica Mountains of • Working on clean-up efforts upstream to downstream. Southern California and runs into the Pacific Ocean, • Coordinating on-the-ground efforts at all levels: from local, to state and federal government. covering 834 square miles of watershed. The river • Developing goals for the continued restoration of the LA River. winds through 14 cities and varies from a concrete Bringing Together Partners runoff ditch for flood control to a natural river for The Urban Waters Federal Partnership includes eight federal agencies, state recreation. The Urban Waters Federal Partnership and county agencies, four cities within the watershed, and more than 15 non- profit and non-governmental organizations.