DOCSLIB.ORG

Village Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Village Plan Supplementary Planning Document I July 2014 Contents 1. Introduction 04 2. Planning Policy and Wider Context 06 3. Spatial Context 09 4. Vision for Kew 14 5. Objectives 14 6. Character Area Assessments 15 7. Features and Materials 48 8. Guidance for Inland Revenue Site 52 9. Guidance for Biothane Site 54 10. Shop Front Guidance 56 11. Forecourt Parking 60 Appendix 1: Relevant Policies and Guidance 62 Appendix 2: Street names character/conservation area 69 Appendix 3: Site Allocations Plan - sites in Kew 71 1. Introduction The purpose of this Village Planning The boundary for the SPD is based on the Following the above, the draft Village Planning Guidance Supplementary Planning The London Borough of Richmond Village Plan areas defined by local residents Guidance was consulted upon between Document (SPD) is primarily to establish upon Thames has been divided into through the ‘All-in-One’ survey in 2010. In March 14th and April 7th. Comments could a vision and planning policy aims for, and a series of smaller village areas. the case of Kew the SPD includes all the be provided via hard copy questionnaire assist in defining, maintaining and enhancing Each village is distinctive in terms of Kew Road Conservation Area to avoid it of online. A drop in session was held on the character of, Kew Village, and to provide the community, facilities and local being split between two villages March 22nd at St Anne’s Church, Kew Green. character – as are many sub areas guidance in this regard. The SPD forms part Resident and stakeholder comments have within the villages. of the wider Village Plan. ■ taking account of physical and been used to develop the final SPD. administrative boundaries, including The villages of the London Borough conservation area boundaries to avoid By identifying key features of the village, The Village Planning Guidance is Richmond upon Thames are these being split between village areas; the SPD clarifies the most important complementary to the wider Village Plans attractive with many listed buildings and aspects and features that contribute to local that have been produced for each village and conservation areas, the local ■ how local communities viewed their local character to guide those seeking to make character of each being unique, area, which include issues and actions for changes to their properties or to develop areas when asked through the Council’s continual improvement. The SPD fulfils the recognisable and important to the 2010 ‘All-In-One’ survey. new properties in the area, as well as being community and to the aesthetic of aim of residents having greater control and a material conservation in determining the borough as a whole. influence over planning and development planning applications. This SPD has been produced by the Council decisions in their local area, being an adopted working closely with the community. This document under the London Borough of The core of this SPD is a series of character area has ensured that local residents, businesses Richmond upon Thames statutory planning assessments for the component areas of Kew. and stakeholders have been genuinely policy framework, and linking to the relevant These character areas have been identified through involved in defining the important features Village Plan. the similarity of key features that are deemed – as well as the opportunities and threats – to define their local character. The assessments that define their local area. establish dominant features and materials as well as an overall description of the street pattern and The community was initially involved housing types. through: Kew Village Planning Guidance SPD area ■ Drop in session at St Luke’s Church, The Avenue (Nov 30th 2013) ■ Resident walkabout around Kew (Dec 1st 2013) ■ Online questionnaire (running Nov 30th to Dec 14th 2013) ■ Stakeholder and business workshop (Jan 10th 2014, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew) Consultation events for the Kew Village Planning Guidance SPD 4 5 2. Planning Policy and Wider Context 2.1. Planning policy framework must designate a Thames Policy Area in Action Plan). The SA Plan will become 2.2. Key planning policies DMP Policy DM DC 1 Design Quality CS Policy CP8: Town and Local Centres DMP Policy DM HD 2 their Development Plan Documents. The part of the Local Plan when adopted. Conservation of Listed Buildings and Scheduled New development must be of a high Retail and town centre uses will be National Planning Policy boroughs must define the boundaries The site-specific proposals in the SA Plan SPDs cannot create new policies but Ancient Monuments architectural and urban design quality supported providing that it is appropriate to by taking into account: proximity to the will look ahead over the next 15 years expand on policies set out in higher plans, based on sustainable design principles. the role in the hierarchy of the centres, and Preservation of Listed Buildings of special The National Planning Policy Framework Thames, contiguous areas with clear visual and be used to set out general principles notably the Core Strategy (CS) and the Development must be inclusive, respect respects the character, environment and architectural or historic interest and (NPPF) sets out the Government’s planning links between areas and buildings and for development and determine planning Development Management Plan (DMP). local character including the nature of historical interest of the area. Ancient Monuments and seek to ensure policies for England and how these are the river, specific geographical features, applications on these sites. Some SA Plan This SPD relates to a considerable number a particular road, and connect with, and that they are kept in a good state of repair. expected to be applied. The NPPF is a key areas and buildings which relate or link to sites in Kew are included in Section 8 of of higher policies, notably: contribute positively, to its surroundings part of the government’s reforms to make the Thames. Kew Gardens and the River this document, which goes into more detail CS Policy CP11 River Thames Corridor based on a thorough understanding of the DMP Policy DM HD 3 the planning system less complex and more Thames section of Kew are designated in on design objectives where appropriate. A CS Policy CP7: Maintaining and Improving the The natural and built environment and site and its context. Buildings of Townscape Merit accessible. The framework acts as guidance the Thames Policy Area in the London Plan. full list of the SA Plan sites are provided in Local Environment the unique historic landscape of the River for local planning authorities and decision- Appendix 2. 7.B All new development should recognise In assessing the design quality of a proposal Thames corridor within the Borough will be Preservation and enhancement of Buildings takers, both in drawing up plans and making Local Planning Policy distinctive local character and contribute to the Council will have regard to the protected and enhanced. of Townscape Merit and the Council will use decisions about planning applications. creating places of a high architectural and following: its powers where possible to protect their It must be taken into account in the The London Borough of Richmond upon urban design quality that are well used and DMP Policy DM OS 4 Historic Parks, Gardens significance, character and setting. preparation of local and neighbourhood Thames current statutory planning policy valued. Proposals will have to illustrate that ■ compatibility with local character and Landscapes plans, and is a material consideration in framework is set out in adopted Plans they: including relationship to existing DMP Policy DM HD 5 World Heritage Site planning decisions. which make up the Local Plan – being Parks and gardens as well as landscapes of townscape the Core Strategy, adopted in April 2009, special historic interest included in the The Council will work with others, to (i) are based on an analysis and Regional Planning Policy and the Development Management Plan, ■ frontages, scale, height, massing, Register compiled by English Heritage and protect, promote, interpret, sustainably use, understanding of the Borough’s adopted in November 2011. There is an proportions and form other historic parks, gardens and landscapes conserve and where appropriate enhance development patterns, features and At a regional level, the London Plan online proposals map and also a range of ■ sustainable development and adaptability, ... (including Royal Botanic Gardens)... will the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew World views, public transport accessibility adopted in 2011 is the overall strategic guidance provided by way of Supplementary subject to aesthetic considerations be protected and enhanced. Heritage Site and its setting including the and maintaining appropriate levels of plan for London setting out an integrated Planning Documents (SPDs) and Guidance buffer zone by conserving its Outstanding amenity; ■ layout and access economic, environmental, transport and for the area. This SPD will form part of the Universal Value, integrity, authenticity and DMP Policy DM HD 1 Conservation Areas – social framework for the development of planning policy framework upon adoption. (ii) connect positively with their ■ space between buildings and relationship significance. designation, protection and enhancement London over the next 20-25 years. This There is also a range of evidence base surroundings to create safe and to the public realm document has been adopted to ensure a studies that the Council has undertaken inclusive places through the use of good ■ detailing and materials Buildings or parts of buildings, street longer-term view of London’s development which help to guide policy making. design principles including layout, form, furniture, trees and other features which is taken when informing decision-making, scale, materials, natural surveillance Whilst all adopted policies are applicable, make a positive contribution to the development and investment. The Council is preparing a Site Allocations and orientation, and sustainable those of particular relevance are: (A full list character, appearance or significance of the Plan (SA Plan), which will include site- construction.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Teddington to Broadness  Obey the COLREGS – in Particular, Your Vessel Must Display the Length Or a Rowing Boat)
    PLA EBB TIDE FLAG WARNING ADVICE NAVIGATION RULES SPEED LIMITS – THAMES BYELAW 16 Wash - be aware of what your wash is doing, both to other users are berthed, please refer to Permanent Notice to Mariner for further When navigating on the tidal Thames you must ensure you proceed at a The PLA has established a warning system based on the tidal observed at Richmond You must comply with the International Regulations for Preventing and the banks and foreshore. If necessary, reduce speed. information. safe speed at all times. You must also take the prevailing wind and tidal Lock low water. The advice is updated daily at 06:00 and is readily available as an Collisions at Sea (the COLREGS) - as modified by the ‘Port of London VHF Radio - vessels over 13.7m in length must carry and use a conditions, the size and type of your vessel, your location in the river, and internet based widget on both homepages of: www.boatingonthethames.co.uk and Thames Byelaws’ - when navigating on the tidal Thames. As the person in VHF radio (see VHF requirements). HIGH SPEED CRAFT ZONES the safety of others into account. In addition a mandatory speed limit of 12 www.pla.co.uk. charge of a vessel, you must also comply with the ‘General Directions for Novices - complete a training course for your chosen activity knots applies between Margaretness and Wandsworth Bridge. See A High Speed Craft Zone exists in two areas (marked in yellow) between Navigation in the Port of London’. Copies of these publications can be before attempting to navigate the tidal Thames.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Village Planning Guidance?
    Kew Village INTRODUCTION TO VILLAGE PLANNING GUIDANCE FOR KEW What is Village Planning Guidance? How can I get involved? London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (LBRuT) wants residents and businesses to help prepare ‘Village Planning Guidance’ for the Kew Village area. There will be two different stages of engagement This will be a document that the Council considers when deciding on planning and consultation before the guidance is adopted. applications. Village Planning Guidance can: During November and December 2013 residents and • Help to identify, with your help, what the ‘local character’ of your area is and businesses are being asked about their vision for the what features need to be retained. future of their areas, thinking about: • Help protect and enhance the local character of your area, particularly if it is • the local character not a designated ‘conservation area’. • heritage assets • Establish key design principles that new development should respond to. • improvement opportunities for specific sites or areas • other planning policy or general village plan issues • The boundary has been based on the Village Plan area to reflect the views of where people live. The open parts of the Thames Policy Area (as Spring 2014 - draft guidance will be written after denoted in purple on the photograph below) will not form part of the Christmas based on your views and a formal (statutory) guidance as this is already covered by a range of other policies. consultation carried out in March/April 2014 before adoption. How does Village Planning Guidance work? How does the ‘Village Planning Guidance’ relate to Village Plans? The Village Planning Guidance will become a formal planning policy ‘Supplementary Planning Document’ (SPD) which the council will take The Planning Guidance builds on the ‘Village Plans’ which account of when deciding on planning applications, so it will influence were developed from the 2010 ‘All in One’ survey developers and householders in preparing plans and designs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great War, 1914-18 Biographies of the Fallen
    IRISH CRICKET AND THE GREAT WAR, 1914-18 BIOGRAPHIES OF THE FALLEN BY PAT BRACKEN IN ASSOCIATION WITH 7 NOVEMBER 2018 Irish Cricket and the Great War 1914-1918 Biographies of The Fallen The Great War had a great impact on the cricket community of Ireland. From the early days of the war until almost a year to the day after Armistice Day, there were fatalities, all of whom had some cricket heritage, either in their youth or just prior to the outbreak of the war. Based on a review of the contemporary press, Great War histories, war memorials, cricket books, journals and websites there were 289 men who died during or shortly after the war or as a result of injuries received, and one, Frank Browning who died during the 1916 Easter Rising, though he was heavily involved in organising the Sporting Pals in Dublin. These men came from all walks of life, from communities all over Ireland, England, Scotland, Wales, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, India and Sri Lanka. For all but four of the fifty-two months which the war lasted, from August 1914 to November 1918, one or more men died who had a cricket connection in Ireland or abroad. The worst day in terms of losses from a cricketing perspective was the first day of the Battle of the Somme, 1 July 1916, when eighteen men lost their lives. It is no coincidence to find that the next day which suffered the most losses, 9 September 1916, at the start of the Battle of Ginchy when six men died.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Post Indian War Memorials Around the World
    Last Post Indian War Memorials Around the World Introduction • 1 Rana Chhina Last Post Indian War Memorials Around the World i Capt Suresh Sharma Last Post Indian War Memorials Around the World Rana T.S. Chhina Centre for Armed Forces Historical Research United Service Institution of India 2014 First published 2014 © United Service Institution of India All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior permission of the author / publisher. ISBN 978-81-902097-9-3 Centre for Armed Forces Historical Research United Service Institution of India Rao Tula Ram Marg, Post Bag No. 8, Vasant Vihar PO New Delhi 110057, India. email: [email protected] www.usiofindia.org Printed by Aegean Offset Printers, Gr. Noida, India. Capt Suresh Sharma Contents Foreword ix Introduction 1 Section I The Two World Wars 15 Memorials around the World 47 Section II The Wars since Independence 129 Memorials in India 161 Acknowledgements 206 Appendix A Indian War Dead WW-I & II: Details by CWGC Memorial 208 Appendix B CWGC Commitment Summary by Country 230 The Gift of India Is there ought you need that my hands hold? Rich gifts of raiment or grain or gold? Lo! I have flung to the East and the West Priceless treasures torn from my breast, and yielded the sons of my stricken womb to the drum-beats of duty, the sabers of doom. Gathered like pearls in their alien graves Silent they sleep by the Persian waves, scattered like shells on Egyptian sands, they lie with pale brows and brave, broken hands, strewn like blossoms mowed down by chance on the blood-brown meadows of Flanders and France.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring London from the Thames Events & Corporate Hire Welcome to London’S Leading Riverboat Service
    UNFORGETTABLE EXPERIENCES EXPLORING LONDON FROM THE THAMES EVENTS & CORPORATE HIRE WELCOME TO LONDON’S LEADING RIVERBOAT SERVICE Thank you for organising such a great event. Prosecco was flowing, great hosts and the sun even came out WELCOME for the sunset! We’re London’s leading riverboat service, providing With a choice of 18 vessels ranging from 12 to 220 our passengers a unique way to get around the capital. capacity we offer transport for sports stars and As well as catering for sightseers and commuters, rock stars to events and concerts, wedding parties, we also offer a deluxe and highly versatile corporate company functions and even a location for filming and private hire service for those wishing to explore and photoshoot. London in comfort and style. Let us show you what we can do CONTENTSEXPLORE On Board Experience 4 Catering & Hospitality 5 Branding, Corporate & Filming 6 Cruise & Excursions 7 Our Fleet 8 Rates 16 Our Route 17 Contact Details 18 4 ONBOARDLOVE EXPERIENCE IT! Thames Clippers are the fastest and most frequent fleet on the river, with 18 vessels available for private hire. Each of our catamarans are spacious, stylish and staffed by a friendly and experienced crew. For our corporate and private clients we offer seven different sizes of vessel with the option of carrying between 12 and 222 guests. The route, length and speed of journey, stop off locations, style of catering, use of facilities on board and time of travel are flexible. This means we can deliver a vast range of events; from business meetings, presentations, networking days, conferences, celebrity parties and product launches to marriage transfers and excursions for family and friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Dubai City of Gold 297.612 € Rennpreis: 297.612 € 7 for Pure Blood Male, Geldings and Females of Three Years and More (Purses D Tribuées to 6 First Ones)
    07.03.2020 - Dubai (E.A.U) Rennen # 7 Seite 13 2410 m Dubai City Of Gold 297.612 € Rennpreis: 297.612 € 7 For pure blood Male, geldings and females of three years and more (Purses d tribuées to 6 first ones). The information concerning runners is Flach iquées comm under the responsibility of the equestrian authority of the country in which the urse is organized. 16:30 All horses, 3 years and more SIM_WINE SIM_PLCE COU_WINE COU_PLCE TRIOE 2410 Desert Encounter 1.318.853 € 2020: 1 Start - 0 Siege - 0 Plätze 5.385 € 2019: 8 Starts - 4 Siege - 2 Plätze 606.873 € 8j. W (Halling - La Chicana) 20.02 Meydan/Dubai 5 59.0 2000 179.490 5,5 Jim Crowley Ghaiyyath, Spotify, Privilegiado 1 Trainer: David Simcock 12.10 Woodbine 1 57.0 2400 Atzeni A Desert Encounter 57.0 Besitzer: Al Mansoori Abdulla 21.09 Newbury 1 60.0 2200 Spencer J Desert Encounter B 24.08 Windsor 1 61.0 2000 Spencer J Desert Encounter Box: 1 Jamie Spencer 02.08 Goodwood 1 57.0 2400 Spencer J Desert Encounter Defoe 812.589 € 2020: 0 Starts - 0 Siege - 0 Plätze 0 € 2019: 5 Starts - 2 Siege - 1 Platz 460.662 € 6j. b br W (Dalakhani - Dulkashe) 27.07 Ascot 9 60.0 2400 19,0 Atzeni A 2 Trainer: Roger Varian 22.06 Ascot 1 57.0 2400 250.909 3,2 Atzeni A Defoe 57.0 Besitzer: Al Maktoum Sh Mohd Obaid 31.05 Epsom Downs 1 57.0 2400 496.242 17,0 Atzeni A Defoe 04.05 Newmarket 2 57.0 2400 111.516 Egan D Defoe Box: 2 Andrea Atzeni 13.04 Newbury 4 57.0 2400 66.909 Atzeni A Marmelo, Aspetar, Laraaib Privilegiado 217.369 € 2020: 2 Starts - 0 Siege - 1 Platz 17.949 € 2019: 7 Starts - 4 Siege - 1 Platz 172.242 € 4j.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Oak Processionary Moth Rapid Reaction Response Prepared by Forest Research on Behalf of the Forestry Commission’S Plant Health Service
    Proposal for Oak Processionary Moth Rapid Reaction response prepared by Forest Research on behalf of the Forestry Commission’s Plant Health Service Introduction The finding of Oak Processionary Moth, Thaumetopoea processionea, in London during 2006 has resulted in considerable press and local authority interest in the threat posed by this moth. This threat encompasses both phytosanitary (the moth is very damaging to a range of oak species) and public health (the larvae possess highly irritating hairs) elements. This proposal does not directly address the public health issue as this is a matter outwith the competence of the Forestry Commission. To date, the responses to finding the moth have been fragmented and lack a coherent structure or overall co-ordinating body. Efforts to either manage the moth or to carry out surveys to determine the extent of the infestations have been very local and uncoordinated within London: • local authority surveys and application of control measures by Richmond Borough; • surveys and local control by Thames Water; • surveys and local control by Kew Gardens authorities; • surveys and local control by the highway authorities responsible for the A40 into London; • surveys and local control by Railtrack; • assessment of possible clustering of skin irritation complaints by local health authorities in London. Meetings have been held with some of the key players, including FR, Kew Gardens, local authorities (Acton, Richmond), local authority health officials, Defra PHSI and with an entomologist contracted to Richmond Borough Council. Arising from a meeting held in November 2006, a Tree Health Forum was organised and took place at Kew on 18 May.
    [Show full text]
  • Kew Shops:Then and Now
    Kew Shops:then and now CAROLINE BLOMFIELD In June 2003, after selling our bookshop by Kew Gardens Station, we set up an exhibition celebrating one hundred years of shopping in Kew. The exhibition was held in a historic venue, the old workshops of Station ROYAL Avenue. They had just undergone complete renovation as a stylish studio 'So.,.Afo..,) \<;. complex, and the owners kindly lent us a large ground floor space. The ....ls exhibition was open to the public for just two days, and to our amazement we had almost 300 visitors. In view of this unexpected response, we are publishing our findings, in the hope that others may attempt something similar - and ideally even more wide-ranging - in their own communities. For most of the 20th century there were four main shopping areas in Kew: the original Kew village around the Green and along Mortlake Terrace; the full length of Sandycombe Road; the west side of the station, known today as 'The Village'; the east side of the station at the top of North Road, part of which has now been landscaped and pedestrianised as 'Kew Plaza'. (Until 1920 there was also a further small row of shops along the Lower Richmond Road, between the south ends of North Road and Dancer Road, called North Parade: these were demolished when the A316 was widened around 1930.) We decided to research these four areas and to try to establish how shops and shopping have changed in Kew, and to what extent premises that were retail businesses one hundred years ago were still operating as shops, and to what extent the goods and services demanded, and thus provided, have changed over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames
    Official LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND UPON THAMES ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR, CRIME AND POLICING ACT 2014 LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND UPON THAMES PUBLIC SPACES PROTECTION ORDER 2020 (DOG CONTROL) The Council of the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (in this Order called “the Council”) hereby makes the following Order pursuant to Section 59 of the Anti- social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 (“the Act”). This Order may be cited as the “London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Public Spaces Protection Order 2017 (Dog Control)”. This Order came into force on 16 October 2017 and lasted for a period of 3 years from that date. This Order was extended, pursuant to section 60 of the Act, for a period of 3 years from 2020. This Order can be extended pursuant to section 60 of the Act. In this Order the following definitions apply: “Person in charge” means the person who has the dog in his possession, care or company at the time the offence is committed or, if none, the owner or person who habitually has the dog in his possession. “Restricted area” means the land described and/or shown in the maps in the Schedule to this Order. “Authorised officer” means a police officer, PCSO, Council officer, and persons authorised by the Council to enforce this Order. "Assistance dog" means a dog that is trained to aid or assist a disabled person. The masculine includes the feminine. The Offences Article 1 - Dog Fouling If within the restricted area, a dog defecates, at any time, and the person who is in charge of the dog fails to remove the faeces from the restricted area forthwith, that person shall be guilty of an offence unless – a.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of the Kew Gardens
    map image is 113.6% of photoshop master ABCDEFGH IJKLMN OPQR 1 RIVER THAMES The Gardens cover 132 ha (326 acres). Woodland Walk Elizabeth Gate to the Great Pagoda is approximately 1.6 km (1 mile). E Oak Collection OR R L S metres T P O 0 500 X P E 5 Natural Area RIVER Green Oak Shelter SIDE W ALK BRENTFORD GATE 2 Bluebells Giant Badger Sett Via Kew Green and Ferry Lane – Rhododendron Dell cars/motorbikes only Log Trail E OR R L S RER T O P S O L Minka House & T Queen’s Garden X P P O E X 4 Bamboo Garden P F E E 6 Climbers and Creepers RR Y LA 3 NE White Peaks Café Kew Palace Towpath to Kew Pier Beetle Loggery and Shop and boats Bluebells Woodland House Royal Kitchens Queen Charlotte’s Waterlily Pond Cottage E OR R 4 L S T P Herbarium, Library, Sackler Crossing O X Magnolias P E Pinetum 7 Art & Archives SY Nash Access by appointment only ON VIST Conservatory ALK Compost Heap S W CES Redwood Grove A RIN The P Orangery 5 The Great Broad Walk Borders Wollemi pine ELIZABETH A GATE Treetop Walkway Ginkgo Lane The Hive 6 AR VIST Waterlily House Kew Bridge Station 0.8 km Woodland Glade across Kew Bridge CED Holly Walk Winter Garden Secluded (South Western Rail) Rose Garden Garden Mediterranean Duke’s Garden Garden Princess of Wales Palm House Conservatory 7 Palm House Parterre The Food Village Aquatic display Kew Gardens ALK Gallery Y W Woodland CHERR Garden King William’s Rock Garden Temple A Davies Alpine Japanese Temperate House GODA VIST House Grass 8 Gateway PA The Botanical RER Temple of Garden LO S Victoria Plaza Café Kitchen Garden P T
    [Show full text]
  • CONTRIBUTE. for Belmont Winner Tiz the Law NTRA 1/4% Check-Off Program See Page 4
    MONDAY, JUNE 22, 2020 BLOODHORSE.COM/DAILY NANCY ROKOS ONWARD Tagg Targets Travers CONTRIBUTE. for Belmont Winner Tiz the Law NTRA 1/4% Check-off Program See page 4 IN THIS ISSUE Give $2.50 for every $1,000 7 Oppenheim: Leading Sires at Royal Ascot of a horse’s sale price to support federal legislative advocacy. 14 Trainers Ponder Options for Dr Post, Max Player 16 No Parole Achieves First Grade 1 Win Help us help horse racing in D.C. for Coteau Grove BLOODHORSE DAILY Download the FREE smartphone app PAGE 1 OF 31 CONTENTS 4 Tagg Targets Travers for Belmont Winner Tiz the Law 6 Leading Sires of Dirt 3-Year-Olds 7 Oppenheim: Leading Sires at Royal Ascot 14 Trainers Ponder Options for Dr Post, Max Player 16 No Parole Achieves First Grade 1 Win for Coteau Grove 18 Jean Elizabeth Rockets to Victory in Whimsical Stakes 19 Red King Reigns Supreme in San Juan Capistrano 20 Blitzkrieg Returns to Winning Form in American Stakes 21 Weston First Winner For Spendthrift’s Hit It a Bomb 22 Cafe Pharoah Locks Down Japan Bid to Kentucky Derby 23 Taghrooda Off the Mark as Son Almighwar Wins at Kempton 24 Scottish Racing Returns After Three-Month Hiatus 25 Results & Entries ANNE M. EBERHARDT ANNE M. 2020 PENNSYLVANIA Still searching for the perfect match for your mare? STALLION Click to view our 2020 Stallion Directory & BOARDING FARM DIRECTORY pabred.com A publication of The Jockey Club Information Systems, Inc. and TOBA Media Properties, Inc. ON THE COVER Editorial Director General Manager Tiz the Law the morning after his Evan Hammonds Scott Carling Belmont Stakes victory at Belmont Park Visuals Director Managing Editor Anne M.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 9 8A 5 4 3 2 1 7 8B a B
    174 181 51 281 53 300 57 22 43 84 286 2 292 14.7m 302 Works 285 234 19.5m 69 86 13 El Sub Sta 298 1 to 12 to 1 14 10 176 GP 11 TCB D Fn 26 3 81 304 1 Allotment 1 287 SOUTH ROAD 195 Gardens 240 38 Stone Niagara House 1 to 10 17.4m 13 13 1 CHANDOS AVENUE CR LB 87 50 274 8 15 25 312 Lourdes Mount 186 PC CHANDOS AVENUE PARK PLACE 70 1 LB 2 60 28 27 89 64 37 3 91 1 to 70 Rochester Mews 242 PC 1 to 9 49 20 Allotment Rochester 1 79 Ealing Park 194 320 PH CHILTON AVENUE Gardens 297 195a House Health 19.0m 59 3 Lindsey House Centre 101 63 2 2 10 2 War Memorial 4 TCB LITTLE EALING LANE 71 66 364 69 248 69a 5 1 19.5m 197a 260 RADBOURNE AVENUE 14 15.0m 1 to 9 17.7m 12.8m 111 197 13 13 26 141 Lodge South 19.1m Lawrence 1 House View 113 Lodge 11.3m 1 Clinic 246 2 14 40 127 LAWRENCE ROAD 13 78 Refreshment Pavilion 1 to 8 129 3 1 Tk South Ealing 75 Tennis Courts 11.6m 121 2 67 Cemetery 4 52 to 6 Chapel TCB 4 Laurel 25 Ashleigh Court 74 1 5 House 6 to 1 66 Garage 50to57 TCB El 11.9m 27 64 Sub Sta 1 5 15.5m 42 to 49 37 64 79 Def 72 58 to 63 Pickering House 81 15 13 14 BIRKBECK ROAD 31to41 TCBs 7 to 15 to 7 14 236 Pavilion 80 TCB 28 49 16 Ashmount Terrace El Sub Sta 29 Chapel TCBs 88 1 13.9m 79 13 23 to 30 to 23 139 81 3 11.0m St Anne's Convent School 106 85 5 16.6m 93 108 87 Lodge 199 86 26 11 Und 22 to 15 8 82 28 International 28 CW FW 83 CW School 16 201 101 71 of London LB 18 222 SOUTH EALING ROAD 11.0m MANOR WAY 69 Boro Const,GL Asly Const & LB Bdy 32 1 MANOR GARDENS 67 10.7m 34 Murray Terrace 212 112 27 25 16.6m 109 100 102 115to122 CW 14 61 48 59
    [Show full text]