DOCSLIB.ORG

Comprehensive Study Report for the Proposed Midwest Mining and Milling Project in Northern Saskatchewan, AREVA Resources Canada Incorporated

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comprehensive Study Report for the Proposed Midwest Mining and Milling Project in Northern Saskatchewan, AREVA Resources Canada Incorporated Comprehensive Study Report for the Proposed Midwest Mining and Milling Project in Northern Saskatchewan, AREVA Resources Canada Incorporated Prepared by: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) Transport Canada (TC) Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment (SMOE) APRIL 2012 CEAR: 06-03-17519 e-DOC: 3881017 (WORD) e-DOC: 3892304 (PDF) e-DOC: 3881017 (WORD) e-DOC: 3892304 (PDF) Comprehensive Study Report for the Midwest Mining and Milling Project in Northern Saskatchewan, AREVA Resources Canada Incorporated EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background This Comprehensive Study Report (CSR) has been collaboratively prepared as a common basis for a provincial environmental assessment (EA) under the Saskatchewan Environmental Assessment Act (SEAA) and the federal Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEA Act). Under the Canada-Saskatchewan Agreement on Environmental Assessment Cooperation, the federal and provincial EA process was coordinated for the proposal by AREVA Resources Canada Incorporated (AREVA) for the proposed Midwest Mining and Milling Project (the Midwest Project). AREVA is the majority owner and operator of the Midwest Project and the McClean Lake Operation. The McClean Lake Operation is a CNSC licensed uranium mine and mill facility located approximately 15 kilometres (km) east of the Midwest Project. Both the Midwest Project and McClean Lake Operation lie in the eastern margin of the Athabasca Basin of northern Saskatchewan. AREVA is proposing to extend the mining and milling activities at the McClean Lake Operation to include mining uranium ore at the Midwest site by open pit mining methods; hauling ore along a road linking the Midwest site with the existing McClean Lake Operation; and milling the uranium ore at the JEB Mill located at the McClean Lake Operation. The Midwest Project would be operated as part of the McClean Lake Operation with the mining activities integrated into the McClean Lake Operation. The Midwest Project is proposed to extract and process approximately 985,000 tonnes of ore averaging 1.7% uranium (U) for a total resource of approximately 16,500 tonnes U metal (approximately 42 million pounds (lbs) uranium oxide (U3O8) equivalent). The development of the Midwest pit, including mining, is expected to take approximately five years, with ore initially accessed after two years. The Midwest ore is expected to be milled in the following five to seven years. Decommissioning of the Midwest site is expected to last two years, followed by five years of post-decommissioning monitoring. The proposed Midwest Project components include: development of the Midwest ore body as an open pit mine dewatering and depositing of material in the Mink Arm portion of South McMahon Lake to access the ore construction of site infrastructure and mine waste management facilities construction of a mine water treatment plant at the Midwest site, which will include a reverse osmosis (RO) treatment process construction of a 17 km transportation and utility corridor linking the Midwest site with the existing McClean Lake Operation development of a pipeline along the transportation corridor to transport waste water from the Midwest site to the McClean Lake Operation for release to the Sink Vulture Treated Effluent Management System (S/V TEMS) e-DOC: 3881017 (WORD) - I - APRIL 2012 e-DOC: 3892304 (PDF) CEAR: 06-03-17519 Comprehensive Study Report for the Midwest Mining and Milling Project in Northern Saskatchewan, AREVA Resources Canada Incorporated increasing production capacity at the JEB Mill from the currently approved 24 million lbs U3O8 equivalent per year to 27 million lbs U3O8 equivalent per year managing the corresponding tailings at the JEB Tailings Management Facility (TMF) development and implementation of a Fish Habitat Compensation Plan (FHCP) Federal Regulatory Responsibilities This CSR has been prepared by the CNSC, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), Transport Canada (TC) and Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) as Responsible Authorities (RAs) and in consultation with Environment Canada (EC) and Health Canada (HC) as federal authorities (FAs) having specialist and expert information or knowledge needed to conduct the EA. Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (AANDC) participated in this EA by assisting CNSC and the CEA Agency identify Aboriginal communities and organizations that might have an interest in the Midwest Project. CNSC, DFO, TC and NRCan, as RAs, have determined that each would have a regulatory decision to take with respect to the Midwest Project as described: CNSC has determined that the proposed Midwest Project may require an amendment to the existing Uranium Mine Operating Licence under subsection 24(2) of the Nuclear Safety and Control Act (NSCA) DFO has determined that the proposed Midwest Project may cause the harmful alteration, disruption, or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat, and will therefore require an Authorization under subsection 35(2) of the Fisheries Act and a section 32 Authorization under the Fisheries Act for the destruction of fish by any means other than fishing TC may issue a Navigable Waters Protection Act (NWPA) Approval under section 5(3) of the NWPA which allows for the interference to navigation NRCan may issue a factory licence pursuant to paragraph 7(1)(a) of the Explosives Act based on the need for an explosives factory and magazine facility during the construction and operation of the Midwest Project These decisions, which would enable the Midwest Project to proceed, trigger the requirement for an EA in accordance with the CEA Act. An exemption from the Governor in Council under section 23 and approvals under sections 6(4) and 10(2) of the NWPA will also be required to enable the Midwest Project to proceed as proposed. As the Midwest Project is described under paragraph 19(a) of the Schedule to the Comprehensive Study List Regulations under the CEA Act, a comprehensive study is required. This CSR was prepared by the CNSC in consultation with DFO, TC, NRCan, EC, HC and the Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment (SMOE) following a technical review of AREVA’s Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) report and additional information provided to the regulators by AREVA as requested. e-DOC: 3881017 (WORD) - II - APRIL 2012 e-DOC: 3892304 (PDF) CEAR: 06-03-17519 Comprehensive Study Report for the Midwest Mining and Milling Project in Northern Saskatchewan, AREVA Resources Canada Incorporated Scope of the Proposed Project The federal scope of the proposed Midwest Project (also referred to as the Project) considered within this CSR includes the construction, operation, and decommissioning of all proposed Project components previously described. The scope of the Midwest Project was approved by the federal Minister of the Environment, in consultation with the President of the CNSC. Scope of the Assessment The assessment under CEA Act considered the potential environmental effects of the Midwest Project, including the atmospheric, geological/hydrogeological, aquatic, terrestrial, human and socio-economic environments, taking into account measures that are technically and economically feasible to prevent or reduce any potential adverse effects of the Project. The scope of assessment also includes a consideration of: alternatives to the Project; alternative means of carrying out the Project; the effects of the environment on the Project; environmental effects related to malfunctions and accidents; potential cumulative environmental effects; measures that would mitigate adverse environmental effects; the significance of the environmental effects; the capacity of renewable resources likely to be affected by the Project; and a monitoring and follow-up program. Potential Effects of the Project on the Environment The RAs assessed the potential impacts that the Midwest Project is likely to have on the environment, based on information provided by AREVA in their EIS and supplemental filings, expert advice provided by the FAs, and discussions with the provincial government through the cooperative review. Aboriginal communities and organizations and public comments were also considered in the EA. The environmental effects which were determined to result in residual effects, which are effects that remain after mitigation has been put into place, were: changes to air quality from air emissions and dust deposition changes to groundwater levels changes to groundwater and surface water quality from the long-term release of contaminants of concern (COCs) related to tailings and waste rock disposal permanent loss of fish habitat from the Mink Arm portion of South McMahon Lake potential aquatic and terrestrial habitat disturbance altered movement and behaviour of wildlife from sensory disturbance changes to surface water quality and sediment quality with aquatic and terrestrial valued ecosystem components (VECs) and human receptors interaction of COCs in air, water, and sediment with aquatic and terrestrial VECs and human receptors e-DOC: 3881017 (WORD) - III - APRIL 2012 e-DOC: 3892304 (PDF) CEAR: 06-03-17519 Comprehensive Study Report for the Midwest Mining and Milling Project in Northern Saskatchewan, AREVA Resources Canada Incorporated Although the Midwest Project will interact with the environment and human components in various ways, through the implementation of mitigation measures, none of the residual effects are considered to be significant. The proposed Midwest Project will result in the HADD of fish habitat
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View Annual Report
    The Future is Nuclear 2005 ANNUAL REPORT Bridging the Gene Producing affordable, clean energy while achieving a sustainable balance between increasing electricity demand and environmental stewardship – this is the promise and potential of a future powered by nuclear energy. It’s why a new generation is opting for nuclear as a reliable and secure energy choice. Cameco is poised and ready to support the new generation. We are a company with the expertise and capacity to deliver the benefits of nuclear energy – starting right now. As the world’s largest uranium producer, Cameco already provides about 20% of global uranium production from the richest mines on the planet. We are also expanding our production by developing two new mines. The company is looking ration Gap to the long-term nuclear future, seeking new reserves OUR PROFILE through a global exploration program with emphasis Cameco, with its head office in in North America and Australia. In nuclear fuel Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, is the production, Cameco has 38% of the western world’s world’s largest uranium producer UF6 conversion capacity, and provides conversion as well as a significant supplier of services and fuel fabrication for Candu reactors. conversion services. The company’s Power production rounds out Cameco’s nuclear competitive position is based on its focus, with 1,000 MW of nuclear power in Ontario. controlling ownership of the world’s largest high-grade reserves and low- A new generation, attentive to the wisdom of cost operations. Cameco’s uranium scientists, environmentalists and consumers, products are used to generate clean understands the future is nuclear.
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium City, Black Lake, Camsell Portage, Fond Du Lac, Stony Rapids, and Wollaston/Hatchet Lake
    CanNorth 2015 AthabascaUranium Working City Group Environmental Monitoring Program ABOUT THE AWG PROGRAM The Athabasca Working Group (AWG) environmental monitoring program began in the Athabasca region of northern Saskatchewan in 2000. The program provides residents with opportunities to test the environment around their communities for parameters that could come from uranium mining and milling operations. These parameters can potentially be spread by water flowing from lakes near the uranium operations, and small amounts may also be spread through the air. In order to address local residents’ concerns, lakes, rivers, plants, wildlife, and air quality are tested each yeah near the northern communities of Uranium City, Black Lake, Camsell Portage, Fond du Lac, Stony Rapids, and Wollaston/Hatchet Lake. The types of plants and animals selected, the locations chosen for sampling, and the sample collections were carried out by, or with the help of, northern community members. The purpose of this brochure is to inform the public of the 2015 environmental monitoring program results in the Uranium City area. STUDY AREA Water, sediment, and fish were sampled from a reference site and a potential exposure site in the Uranium City area in 2015. Fredette Lake was chosen as the reference site because it is not influenced by uranium operations. Black Bay of Lake Athabasca (Black Bay) is referred to as the potential exposure site because it is located downstream of the active uranium operations in northern Saskatchewan. Air quality is monitored at two locations near the community of Uranium City and plant and wildlife samples are collected each year near the community when available.
    [Show full text]
  • + 2020 Annual Information Form
    Denison Mines Corp. 2020 Annual Information Form March 26, 2021 ABOUT THIS ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM This annual information form (“AIF”) is dated March 26, Table of Contents 2021. Unless stated otherwise, all of the information in this AIF is stated as at December 31, 2020. About this AIF .................................... 1 About Denison ................................... 6 This AIF has been prepared in accordance with Canadian Developments over the Last Three securities laws and contains information regarding Years ................................................. 8 Denison’s history, business, mineral reserves and The Uranium Industry ........................ 17 resources, the regulatory environment in which Denison Mineral Resources and Reserves 24 does business, the risks that Denison faces and other Mineral Properties ............................. 27 important information for Shareholders. Athabasca Exploration: Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification ........... 102 This AIF incorporates by reference: Denison Operations ........................... 107 Manager of UPC ................................ 111 Denison’s management discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) for the year ended December 31, 2020, Denison Closed Mines Group ........... 112 Environmental, Health, Safety and Denison’s audited consolidated financial Sustainability Matters ........................ 112 statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, Government Regulation .................... 114 Risk Factors ...................................... 120 both of which
    [Show full text]
  • Wheeler River Project Provincial Technical Proposal and Federal Project Description
    Wheeler River Project Provincial Technical Proposal and Federal Project Description Denison Mines Corp. May 2019 WHEELER RIVER PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL & PROJECT DESCRIPTION Wheeler River Project Provincial Technical Proposal and Federal Project Description Project Summary English – Page ii French – Page x Dene – Page xx Cree – Page xxviii PAGE i WHEELER RIVER PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL & PROJECT DESCRIPTION Summary Wheeler River Project The Wheeler River Project (Wheeler or the Project) is a proposed uranium mine and processing plant in northern Saskatchewan, Canada. It is located in a relatively undisturbed area of the boreal forest about 4 km off of Highway 914 and approximately 35 km north-northeast of the Key Lake uranium operation. Wheeler is a joint venture project owned by Denison Mines Corp. (Denison) and JCU (Canada) Exploration Company Ltd. (JCU). Denison owns 90% of Wheeler and is the operator, while JCU owns 10%. Denison is a uranium exploration and development company with interests focused in the Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan, Canada with a head office in Toronto, Ontario and technical office in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. Historically Denison has had over 50 years of uranium mining experience in Saskatchewan, Elliot Lake, Ontario, and in the United States. Today, the company is part owner (22.5%) of the McClean Lake Joint Venture which includes the operating McClean Lake uranium mill in northern Saskatchewan. To advance the Project, Denison is applying an innovative approach to uranium mining in Canada called in situ recovery (ISR). The use of ISR mining at Wheeler means that there will be no need for a large open pit mining operation or multiple shafts to access underground mine workings; no workers will be underground as the ISR process is conducted from surface facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • 20170828-Jason-Cameron-Nuclear-Infrastructure-Council-Eng.Pdf
    THE CANADIAN NUCLEAR SAFETY COMMISSION PRESENTATION TO THE USNIC TRADE MISSION TO CANADA Jason Cameron, Vice-President Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission nuclearsafety.gc.ca August 28, 2017 – Ottawa, Ontario Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission • Regulates the use of nuclear energy and materials to protect health, safety, security and the environment • Implements Canada's international commitments on the peaceful use of nuclear energy • Disseminates objective scientific, technical and regulatory information to the public Canada’s nuclear watchdog We will never compromise safety! Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 2 Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission • Established in May 2000, under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act • Replaced the Atomic Energy and Control Board (AECB) under the 1946 Atomic Energy Control Act More than 70 years of ensuring nuclear safety Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 3 CNSC Regulates All Nuclear-Related Facilities and Activities • Uranium mines and mills • Uranium fuel fabrication and processing • Nuclear power plants • Nuclear substance processing • Industrial and medical applications • Nuclear research and educational activities • Transportation of nuclear substances • Nuclear security and safeguards • Export/import control • Waste management facilities …From cradle to grave Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 4 Independent Commission • Quasi-judicial administrative tribunal • Agent of the Government of Canada (the Crown) • Reports to Parliament through Minister of Natural Resources • Commission members are independent and part-time • Commission hearings are public and Webcast • All presentations, including staff’s, are public • Decisions can only be reviewed by Federal Court Transparent, science-based decision-making Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 5 Our Commission Members Dr. Michael Binder President and Chief Executive Officer, CNSC (Term expires May 8, 2018) Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Oversight Report for Uranium Mines and Mills in Canada: 2018
    Regulatory Oversight Report for Uranium Mines and Mills in Canada: 2018 Commission Meeting December 12, 2019 CMD 19-M36.A CNSC Staff Presentation e-Doc 5970530 PPTX e-Doc 6018833 PDF Commission Meeting, December 12, 2019 CMD 19-M36.A – 2018 ROR for Uranium Mines and Mills CNSC Regulatory Oversight Reports for 2018 • November 6, 2019: Canadian Nuclear Power Generating Sites: 2018 • November 7, 2019: Use of Nuclear Substances in Canada: 2018 • November 7, 2019: Canadian Nuclear Laboratories Sites: 2018 • December 11, 2019: Uranium and Nuclear Substance Processing Facilities in Canada: 2018 • December 12, 2019: Uranium Mines and Mills in Canada: 2018 Reporting on licensee performance based on CNSC oversight nuclearsafety.gc.ca 2 Commission Meeting, December 12, 2019 CMD 19-M36.A – 2018 ROR for Uranium Mines and Mills Presentation Outline • Errata • CNSC’s regulatory oversight activities • Uranium mine and mill facilities • Performance of uranium mines and mills • Interventions • Conclusions SAG mill used to grind ore at the McArthur River Operation. (Photo source: CNSC) nuclearsafety.gc.ca 3 Commission Meeting, December 12, 2019 CMD 19-M36.A – 2018 ROR for Uranium Mines and Mills Errata – to be corrected before the report is published Appendix B, Table B1, corrected information Facility Safety and control area Date report issued Fitness for Service, Conventional Health and Safety, March 20, 2018 Environmental Protection, Human Performance Management Environmental Protection, Radiation Protection, October 31, 2018 McArthur Conventional Health and Safety River Physical Design, Environmental Protection, Radiation August 8, 2018 Operation Protection, Conventional Health and Safety Environmental Protection October 2, 2018 Emergency Management and Fire Protection January 16, 2019 nuclearsafety.gc.ca 4 Commission Meeting, December 12, 2019 CMD 19-M36.A – 2018 ROR for Uranium Mines and Mills Errata – to be corrected before the report is published Appendix J: Environmental Action Level and Regulatory Exceedances Reported to CNSC.
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium City
    Community Meeting Record January 29 – Feb 1, 2019 Uranium City – January 29, 2019 Attendees • Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC) o Ian Wilson o David Sanscartier o Chris Reid o Robyn Morris o John Sprague o Jennifer Brown • Mina Patel (Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC)) • Jaynine McCrea (Fond du Lac Nuna Joint Venture (FDLNJV)) • Dean Classen (Uranium City Contracting (UCC)) • Kyle Remus (QMPoints) • Glen Strong (QMPoints) • Emily Jones (Translator) Agenda 1. Prayer 2. Lunch 3. Video 4. Satellite Sites (David) 5. Uranium City Contracting (Dean) 6. Gunnar Overview (Chris) 7. Gunnar Other Site Aspects (Chris) 8. Gunnar Other Site Aspects (QMPoints) 9. Gunnar Tailings (Robyn) 10. Gunnar Tailings (Jaynine) 11. Lorado (Ian) 12. Photo Contest (John) 13. CNSC (Mina) 14. Prize Draws and Close Discussion Satellite Sites Q. Looking at the criteria you have for workers on the project, do you have criteria for a certain number of or percentage of women? A. There is nothing specific, but the wording states that the process is to be all inclusive and non- discriminatory. Q. What about the criteria for equipment usage? Is that including Indigenous? A. It is not specific to Indigenous. The second point is for the equipment, not the operator. 1 Community Meeting Record January 29 – Feb 1, 2019 Q. How is the gamma survey done? Is it on contact? A. The survey is done one meter above the ground. Q. How much soil is required to cover the gamma spots? What is required for protection? A. We are putting 30-50 cm over the hot spots, which is more than enough.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation to the Canadian Association of Nuclear Host Communities
    CANADIAN NUCLEAR SAFETY COMMISSION nuclearsafety.gc.ca Michael Binder President and Chief Executive Officer Presentation to the Canadian Association of Nuclear Host Communities February 21, 2018 – Ottawa, Ontario nuclearsafety.gc.ca eDOCS: 5437640 The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) Our Mandate Regulates the use of nuclear energy and materials to protect health, safety, and security and the environment Implements Canada's international commitments on the peaceful use of nuclear energy Disseminates objective scientific, technical and regulatory information to the public We will never compromise safety 2 nuclearsafety.gc.ca The CNSC Regulates All Nuclear Facilities And Activities In Canada Uranium mines and mills Nuclear research and educational activities Uranium fuel fabrication and processing Transportation of nuclear substances Nuclear power plants Nuclear security and safeguards Nuclear substance processing Import and export controls Industrial and medical applications Waste management facilities 3 nuclearsafety.gc.ca CNSC Staff Located Across Canada Fiscal year 2017–18 Human resources: 857 full-time equivalents Financial resources: $148 million (~70% cost recovery; ~30% appropriation) Licensees: 1,700 Licences: 2,500 Headquarters (HQ) in Ottawa 4 site offices at power plants Saskatoon Calgary 1 site office at Chalk River 4 regional offices Chalk River HQ Point Lepreau Laval Bruce Darlington Mississauga Pickering 4 nuclearsafety.gc.ca Independent Commission • Quasi-judicial administrative tribunal • Agent of the Crown (duty to consult) • Reports to Parliament through Minister of Natural Resources • Commission members are independent and part-time • Commission hearings are public and Webcast • Staff presentations in public • Decisions are reviewable by Federal Court Transparent, science-based decision making 5 nuclearsafety.gc.ca Commission Members Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT AID 539 Mining and Access Roads
    PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT AID 539 Mining and Access Roads.—In 1951 the Department of Mines undertook a program of road construction in the mineralized areas of the province, to open them for prospecting and development and to facilitate the actual operation of mining enterprises. When the importance of this program in its relation to the whole development of northern Ontario became apparent, the Government decided that its scope should be widened and, with that end in view, an interdepartmental committee was set up early in 1955 to decide on matters of policy and to determine the locations and priorities of the proposed roads. The Minister of Mines sits on this committee with the Ministers of Lands and Forests, of Treasury, of Highways and of Reform Institutions. The Department of Highways supervises the construction of all access roads. Certain roads may be subsidized while others may be financed solely by Department of Mines funds. The sum of $1,500,000 a year has been made available for such projects. Manitoba.—The Mines Branch of the Manitoba Department of Mines and Natural Resources offers five main services of assistance to the mining industry: maintenance, by the Mining Recorder's offices at Winnipeg and The Pas, of all records essential to the granting and retention of titles to every mineral location in Manitoba; compilation, by the geological staff of the Branch, of historical and current information pertinent to mineral occurrences of interest and expansion of this information by a continuing program of geological mapping; enforcement of mine safety regulations and, by collaboration with industry, introduction of new practices such as those concerned with mine ventilation and the training of mine rescue crews which contribute to the health and welfare of mine workers; and maintenance of a chemical and assay laboratory to assist the prospector and the professional man in the classification of rocks and minerals and the evaluation of mineral occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • 1675 Uranium City Final.Indd
    AAWGWG 22013013 UUraniumranium CityCity AAthabascathabasca WorkingWorking GroupGroup CanNorth EEnvironmentalnvironmental MonitoringMonitoring ProgramProgram ABOUT THE AWG PROGRAM TheThe AthabascaAthabasca WorWorkingking GGrouproup (A(AWG)WG) eenvironmentalnvironmental monmonitoringitoring program bbeganegan iinn tthehe year 2000 andand pprovidesrovides rresidentsesidents wwithith oopportunitiespportunities to test tthehe enenvironmentvironment aaroundround ttheirheir comcommunitiesmunities forfor parametersparameters ththatat ccouldould ccomeome ffromrom uuraniumranium mminingining aandnd mmillingilling operatiooperations.ns. TheThesese pparametersarameters can potentiallypotentially bbee sspreadpread by watwaterer fflowinglowing ffromrom llakesakes nnearear tthehe uraniuuraniumm ooperations,perations, anandd ssmallmall amountsamounts maymay aalsolso bebe spreadspread tthroughhrough tthehe aiair.r. IInn oorderrder ttoo aaddressddress llocalocal rresidents’esidents’ coconcerns,ncerns, llakes,akes, rivers,rivers, pplants,lants, wwildlife,ildlife, aandnd aairir quaqualitylity aarere ttestedested nnearear tthehe nnorthernorthern ccommunitiesommunities ooff Uranium City, BlackBlack Lake,Lake, CamsellCamsell Portage,Portage, FFond-du-Lac,ond-du-Lac, SStonytony RaRapids,pids, aandnd WWollastonollaston LaLake/Hatchetke/Hatchet LaLake.ke. TheThe ttypesypes ooff plantsplants and anianimalsmals sselected,elected, tthehe llocationsocations chchosenosen fforor samsampling,pling, aandnd tthehe sasamplemple collectionscollections werewere carriedcarried
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Life Cycle Analysis of Base Load Electricity in Ontario
    [Type text] Canadian Energy Research Institute Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Base Load Electricity Generation in Ontario Seyed Jazayeri Paul Kralovic Afshin Honarvar Abbas Naini Jon Rozhon Rami Shabaneh Thorn Walden Prepared for the Canadian Nuclear Association October 2008 Relevant • Independent • Objective COMPARATIVE LIFE CYLE ASESSMENT (LCA) OF BASE LOAD ELECTRICITY GENERATION IN ONTARIO ii Canadian Energy Research Institute v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES..........................................................................................................IX LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................XI ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..............................................................................................XIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................. XV ES1.1 Background .........................................................................................................xv ES1.2 Purpose of the Study ............................................................................................xv ES1.3 Methodology........................................................................................................xv ES1.4 The Process LCA ................................................................................................. xvi ES2 Power Generation in Canada ................................................................................ xvi ES3
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Saskatchewan Administration District (NSAD)
    Northern Saskatchewan Administration District (NSAD) Camsell Uranium ´ Portage City Stony Lake Athasbasca Rapids Athabasca Sand Dunes Provincial Park Cluff Lake Points Wollaston North Eagle Point Lake Airport McLean Uranium Mine Lake Cigar Lake Uranium Rabbit Lake Wollaston Mine Uranium Mine Lake McArthur River 955 Cree Lake Key Lake Uranium Reindeer Descharme Mine Lake Lake 905 Clearwater River Provincial Park Turnor 914 La Loche Lake Garson Black Lake Point Bear Creek Southend Michel Village St. Brabant George's Buffalo Hill Patuanak Narrows 102 Seabee 155 Gold Mine Santoy Missinipe Lake Gold Sandy Ile-a-la-crosse Pinehouse Bay Stanley Mission Wadin Little Bay Pelican Amyot Lac La Ronge Jans Bay La Plonge Provincial Park Narrows Cole Bay 165 La Ronge Beauval Air Napatak Keeley Ronge Tyrrell Lake Jan Lake Lake 55 Sturgeon-Weir Creighton Michel 2 Callinan Point 165 Dore Denare Lake Tower Meadow Lake Provincial Park Beach Beach 106 969 916 Ramsey Green Bay Weyakwin East 55 Sled Trout Lake Lake 924 Lake Little 2 Bear Lake 55 Prince Albert Timber National Park Bay Prince Albert Whelan Cumberland Little Bay Narrow Hills " Peck Fishing G X Delaronde National Park Provincial Park House NortLahke rLnak eTowns Northern Hamlets ...Northern Settlements 123 Creighton Black Point Descharme Lake 120 Noble's La Ronge Cole Bay Garson Lake 2 Point Dore Lake Missinipe # Jans Bay Sled Lake Ravendale Northern Villages ! Peat Bog Michel Village Southend ...Resort Subdivisions 55 Air Ronge Patuanak Stanley Mission Michel Point Beaval St. George's Hill Uranium
    [Show full text]