DOCSLIB.ORG

O/Planet 14.3 Eng

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Our Planet Volume 14 No 3 The magazine of the United Nations Environment Programme ENERGY Gerhard Schroeder Key to development Ted Turner The energy challenge Richard G. Lugar Plant power M. Kannappan New energy for development Margaret Beckett Delivering change Ma Kai Benign growth Leonard Good Brightening the future EDITORIAL Klaus Toepfer and Corrado Clini Our Planet www.ourplanet.com 21 Greening oil Philip Watts, Chairman of the Committee of Managing Directors of the Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies 23 Blue-sky thinking Takeo Fukui, President and CEO of the Honda Motor Co. Ltd an Capellen/UNEP/Topham 24 Books and products V 3 Editorial 14 Benign growth Klaus Toepfer, Executive Director of Ma Kai, Minister in Charge of the UNEP, and Corrado Clini, Director State Development and Reform General of the Italian Ministry of Commission, China Environment and former co-Chair of the G8 Task Force on Renewable Energy 14 Green energy Liu Shuying, Vice Chairperson of 4Key to development Jilin Provincial People’s Congress and Gerhard Schroeder, Chancellor of the National Project Director for Federal Republic of Germany Modernized Biomass Energy, China 6 The energy challenge 16 At a glance: Energy Shuangyan/UNEP/Topham Ted Turner, Chairman of the United Nations Foundation 18 Sustainable dreams Wa Chin-Chin Gutierrez, award- 7 Plant power winning actress and 25 New energy to assault poverty Richard G. Lugar, Chairman of the US conservationist: interview Youba Sokona, Head of Energy Senate Foreign Relations Committee Program, ENDA-TM, Senegal 8 Bioenergy: doing well 26 New energy entrepreneurs while doing right Francis Yamba, Director of the Timothy E. Wirth, President of the Centre for Energy, Environment United Nations Foundation; C. Boyden and Engineering, Zambia Gray, partner at Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering; John D. Podesta, President 28 Time to get serious of the Center for American Progress Eileen Claussen, President of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change 10 New energy for development M. Kannappan, Minister of Non- UNEP/Topham 30 Breaking the ice Conventional Energy Sources, India Maria Maack, Environmental Manager 19 Brightening the future of Icelandic New Energy 12 People Leonard Good, CEO and Chairman of the Global 32 In my lifetime – 100 per cent 13 Delivering change Environment Facility renewable Margaret Beckett, Secretary of State Amaidhi Devaraj, student of Law at for the Environment, Food and the University of Bangalore, South Rural Affairs, United Kingdom India Our Planet, This issue of Our Planet has been made possible by the generosity of the United Nations Foundation/Better the magazine of the World Fund. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) PO Box 30552, Nairobi, Kenya The contents of this magazine do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP, the United Nations Foundation or the editors, Tel (254 20) 621 234; fax 623 927; nor are they an official record. The designations employed and the presentation do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever telex 22068 UNEP KE on the part of UNEP or the UN Foundation concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city or its authority, or concerning e-mail: [email protected] the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. www.unep.org The non-copyrighted contents of this magazine may be reprinted without charge provided that Our Planet and the author or ISSN 1013-7394 photographer concerned are credited as the source and the editors are notified in writing and sent a voucher copy. Director of Publication: Eric Falt Our Planet welcomes articles, reviews, illustrations and photos for publication but cannot guarantee that they will be published. Editor: Geoffrey Lean Unsolicited manuscripts, photographs and artwork will not be returned. Coordinator: Naomi Poulton Subscriptions: If you wish to receive Our Planet on a regular basis and are not currently on the mailing list, please contact Mani Special Contributor: Nick Nuttall Kebede, Circulation Manager, Our Planet, for subscription details, giving your name and address and your preferred language Circulation Manager: Manyahleshal Kebede (English, French or Spanish). Design: Roger Whisker Change of address: Please send your address label together with your new address to: Mani Kebede, Circulation Manager, Our Web Editor: Chris Cypert Planet, UNEP, PO Box 30552, Nairobi, Kenya. Production: Banson Printed in the United Kingdom This magazine is printed using vegetable-based inks on paper made from 100 per cent recycled waste material. It is Front cover: Banson bleached without any damage to the environment. 2 Our Planet Goals and the WSSD Plan of Imple- EDITORIAL mentation are to be achieved, and the proportion of the world’s people in poverty is to be halved by 2015. From the desks of Some 3 billion people rely on dung, coal, charcoal and kerosene for cooking KLAUS TOEPFER and heating. Inefficient use of these United Nations Under-Secretary-General and Executive Director, UNEP fuels contributes to indoor and local air pollution, linked to up to 5 per cent of and CORRADO CLINI global disease. Director General of the Italian Ministry of Environment and former The Global Environment Facility is backing an assessment of the solar and co-Chair of the G8 Task Force on Renewable Energy wind potential of developing countries. And the Sustainable Energy Finance s delegates gather in Milan for the Conference of the Parties to the Initiative (SEFI), launched only a few the next round of climate change Barcelona Convention. These are ideas weeks ago at a UNEP Finance Initiative A negotiations, some may wonder that were born out of the World Summit meeting in Tokyo, Japan, will comple- why such an event is necessary when on Sustainable Development (WSSD) in ment attempts to overcome financial the Kyoto Protocol, the international Johannesburg last year and modelled on barriers to a rapid, widespread uptake of instrument for combating global warm- recommendations made earlier by the clean energy systems. ing, is not yet in force. G8 Renewable Energy Task Force. These are just some projects, part- Surely, they will say, we can achieve Among early success stories are the nerships and initiatives. Others are little of substance until 55 countries installation of solar power in Brazil, India underway in the United States, Japan representing 55 per cent of the and Sri Lanka through partnerships inc- and elsewhere. Clearly not all will be emissions of the industrialized world luding BP Solar and Shell Renewables. successful. Some may wither and die. have ratified it. REEEP may be the latest initiative of But many different kinds of flowers are Such doubters should step outside its kind, but it is by no means the first – needed to make a beautiful bouquet, and the cocoon of gloom and smell the or the last. Last year the Global Network so many are now blossoming that there flowers. on Energy for Sustainable Development is the real promise of a less carbon In Italy – which hosts this ninth – involving specialized centres in India, intensive future. session of the Conference of the Parties Argentina, Senegal, Kenya and other In Milan we must water this garden so (COP9) to the United Nations Framework countries – was launched at that the initiatives so actively backed by Convention on Climate Change – for Johannesburg. many countries, companies and example, energy producers have been UNEP and the UN Foundation – communities can be growing strongly obliged to deliver a fixed amount of re- whose sister body, the Better World when the Kyoto Protocol finally enters newable energy into the national grid Fund, has generously supported this into force ■ since 1999. A national plan for increasing issue of Our Planet – have been de- wind and biomass-based energy gener- veloping the Rural Energy Enterprise ation has been established: its fruits Development (REED) programme. It has include new 800 megawatt capacity for three spin-offs: AREED, in Africa; wind, and 10 megawatts from biomass in CREED, in China, and B-REED focused Maratta Bassa, Umbria. on the Bahia and Alagoas areas of north- New laws, economic incentives and east Brazil. Other supporters include the the fast tracking of projects – both na- Fund for International Partnerships, tionally inspired and as part of European E+Co, the Blue Moon Fund, The Nature Union initiatives – have helped improve Conservancy and UNEP’s collaborative the prospects for cleaner energy. Riso centre in Denmark. Power companies and banks are REED aims to establish networks of actively involved, proving yet again that clean energy entrepreneurs and YOUR VIEWS saving the planet is a profitable business businesses in developing countries. We would really like to receive your which generates jobs. AREED, for example, has invested in 15 feedback on the issues raised in this Next year Germany will host the clean energy enterprises, supporting edition of Our Planet. Please either International Conference on Renewable projects including the manufacturing e-mail [email protected] or Energies. Last October the United of efficient cooking stoves, solar write to: Kingdom launched its Renewable water-heating systems, wind-powered Feedback, Our Planet Energy and Energy Efficiency Partner- pumping and improved distribution of 27 Devonshire Road ship (REEEP) and in November Italy liquefied petroleum gas. Cambridge CB1 2BH launched the Mediterranean Renewable Access to energy is essential if the United Kingdom Energy Partnership on the occasion of United Nations Millennium Development 3 Our Planet KEY TO development GERHARD SCHROEDER says that sustainable energy supplies are essential to combat poverty, prevent crises and conflicts and safeguard natural resources round a third of the world’s population lacks adequate access to energy supplies. Improving this situation A provides one of the major challenges for future-oriented policy at the start of the 21st century. Germany is participating in efforts to facilitate sustainable energy supplies all over the world. We expressed this in particular at the Johannesburg World Summit in September 2002 by announcing concrete programmes, which sent out a strong signal to the international community.
Recommended publications
  • Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services

    Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services

    Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services Katherine Hawkins University of Minnesota October 2003 INTRODUCTION According to Mooney and Ehrlich (1997), the idea that humans depend on natural systems dates back as far as Plato, but the first modern publication that addresses this issue is Man and Nature by George Perkins Marsh in 1864. He realized that the world’s resources were not infinite, and was aware of the importance of natural systems to soil, water, climate, waste disposal, and pest control. In the 1940's, books such as Aldo Leopold’s A Sand County Almanac (1949), Fairfield Osborn’s Our Plundered Planet (1948) and William Vogt’s Road to Survival (1948) brought new attention to the issues addressed by Marsh. The first publication that addressed ecosystems providing “services” to human society is Man’s Impact on the Global Environment by the Study of Critical Environmental Problems in 1970. They provided a list of “environmental services”, which was expanded by Holdren and Ehrlich in 1974. In subsequent publications, these services were referred to as “public services of the global ecosystem” and “nature’s services”, and were finally coined as “ecosystem services” by Ehrlich and Ehrlich in 1981. One of the first documents discussing economic valuation of ecosystem services was Proposed Practices for Economic Analysis of River Basin Projects by the Committee on Water Resources in 1958 (Bingham et al. 1995). Valuation of ecosystem continued throughout the next decades (de Groot et al. 2002), but research and attention has expanded greatly since two publications helped the subject gain popularity. The first was a book, edited by Gretchen Daily, called Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems (1997).
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    LibrarY\ Public Disclosure Authorized SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: THE GLOBAL IMPERATIVE MV The Fairfield Osborn Memorial Lecture Public Disclosure Authorized by A. W. Clausen, President Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Washington, D.C. November 12, 1981 Public Disclosure Authorized __ J Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. And thank you, Mr. Reilly. I am honored to deliver this year's Fairfield Osborn Memorial Lecture in Environmental Science. I believe I'm the first banker ever to be selected for this honor, wh-ch has traditionally been accorded to distinguished conservationists. Fairfield Osborn himself, however, was a businessman -- an investment broker, who was concerned both about short-term economic development and also about its long-term sustainability. As founder and then president of the Conservation Foundation, a cosponsor of this memorial lecture, Osborn worked until his death in 1969 to arouse the concern of people everywhere to the "...accumulated velocity with which (man) is destroying his own life sources." In his book, Our Plundered Planet, which appeared in 1948, Osborn wrote: "We are rushing forward unthinkingly through days of incredible accomplishment...and we have forgotten the earth, forgotten it in the sense that we are failing to regard it as the source of our life." -2- Fairfield Osborn insisted that the only kind of development that makes sense is development .that can be sustained. Beginning, then, from this basic premise, I'll make three main points tonight: - first, that if our goal is sustainable development, our perspective must be global; - second, that human development must allow for continued economic growth, especially in the Third World, if it is to be sustainable; and - third, that sustainable development requires vigorous attention to resource management and the environment.
  • Some Historical Notes on Ecological Sensibilities in Modern Western Culture

    Some Historical Notes on Ecological Sensibilities in Modern Western Culture

    Some Historical Notes on Ecological Sensibilities in Modern Western Culture A revised version of a lecture given in the School of Economics of the University of Hyderabad in 2014 by Mark Lindley In Western culture since ca.1800, ecological sensibilities, though hardly dominant, have cropped up now and then in one way and another. This essay will include succinct descriptions of some examples illus- trating various points of concern (highlighted in bold-face font). • In 1798, Thomas Malthus, a top English economist of the generation after Adam Smith, had said that “The power [i.e. rate] of [human] population [increase] is so superior to the power of the earth to produce subsistence for man, that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race.” He said it would happen by means of “war, pestilence, [and] famine”. (The number of humans at that time was about one thousand million.) • In 1804, William Blake published a powerful poem (though only 16 lines long) contrasting (a) the working conditions in the English cotton mills and the air pollution which their coal-burning steam engines were causing, with (b) a utopian concept of a green “new Jerusalem” in England where, he imagined, Jesus had supposedly once visited. Some lines from the poem are: “And did the Countenance Divine / Shine forth upon our clouded hills? / And was Jerusalem buildèd here / Among these dark Satanic mills?”. (A musical setting of this poem is beloved today in England. Many Brits want it to be the national anthem.) • In 1797, a French hydraulic engineer, Jean Antoine Fabre, published a book explaining (among other things) how streams flowing fast on micro-watersheds become torrents ravaging fertile valley floors.
  • How Do Environmental Enterprise Systems Contribute to Sustainability Value? a Practitioner-Oriented Framework

    How Do Environmental Enterprise Systems Contribute to Sustainability Value? a Practitioner-Oriented Framework

    Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) ACIS 2016 Proceedings Australasian (ACIS) 2016 How do environmental enterprise systems contribute to sustainability value? A practitioner-oriented framework Giang Hoang RMIT University, [email protected] Alemayehu Molla RMIT University, [email protected] Pak-Lok Poon RMIT University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2016 Recommended Citation Hoang, Giang; Molla, Alemayehu; and Poon, Pak-Lok, "How do environmental enterprise systems contribute to sustainability value? A practitioner-oriented framework" (2016). ACIS 2016 Proceedings. 59. https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2016/59 This material is brought to you by the Australasian (ACIS) at AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). It has been accepted for inclusion in ACIS 2016 Proceedings by an authorized administrator of AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). For more information, please contact [email protected]. Australasian Conference on Information Systems Hoang et al. 2016, Wollongong NSW The value of environmental enterprise systems HOW DO ENVIRONMENTAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS CONTRIBUTE TO SUSTAINABILITY VALUE? A PRACTITIONER-ORIENTED FRAMEWORK Giang Hoang School of Business IT and Logistics RMIT University Melbourne, Australia Email: [email protected] Alemayehu Molla School of Business IT and Logistics RMIT University Melbourne, Australia Email: [email protected] Pak-Lok Poon School of Business IT and Logistics RMIT University Melbourne, Australia Email: [email protected] Abstract Environmental enterprise systems (EES) are integrated software services that offer a platform to automate and manage environmental sustainability processes, data, risk and reporting. EES are widely used in organisations, but their benefits depend on nurturing value creating mechanisms and pathways.
  • Remote Sensing

    Remote Sensing

    remote sensing Review A Review of the Sustainability Concept and the State of SDG Monitoring Using Remote Sensing Ronald C. Estoque National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan; [email protected] or [email protected] Received: 4 April 2020; Accepted: 11 May 2020; Published: 31 May 2020 Abstract: The formulation of the 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) was a major leap forward in humankind’s quest for a sustainable future, which likely began in the 17th century, when declining forest resources in Europe led to proposals for the re-establishment and conservation of forests, a strategy that embodies the great idea that the current generation bears responsibility for future generations. Global progress toward SDG fulfillment is monitored by 231 unique social-ecological indicators spread across 169 targets, and remote sensing (RS) provides Earth observation data, directly or indirectly, for 30 (18%) of these indicators. Unfortunately, the UN Global Sustainable Development Report 2019—The Future is Now: Science for Achieving Sustainable Development concluded that, despite initial efforts, the world is not yet on track for achieving most of the SDG targets. Meanwhile, through the EO4SDG initiative by the Group on Earth Observations, the full potential of RS for SDG monitoring is now being explored at a global scale. As of April 2020, preliminary statistical data were available for 21 (70%) of the 30 RS-based SDG indicators, according to the Global SDG Indicators Database. Ten (33%) of the RS-based SDG indicators have also been included in the SDG Index and Dashboards found in the Sustainable Development Report 2019—Transformations to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.
  • Virginia Pollution Prevention Case Study Roanoke Cement Company

    Virginia Pollution Prevention Case Study Roanoke Cement Company

    Virginia Pollution Prevention Case Study Roanoke Cement Company Company Information Roanoke Cement Company (RCC) is a limestone mining and processing facility located in Botetourt County and bordered by the Jefferson National Forest and the Appalachian Mountains. Roanoke Cement currently uses about 100 of the 2,500 acres that it owns. Roanoke Cement began production in 1951 and was acquired by Titan America LLC in 1999. It is the only active cement plant in Virginia, serving Virginia, North Carolina, West Virginia, Maryland, Tennessee, Kentucky, South Carolina, and Washington D.C. Roanoke Cement makes sustainable development a top priority by combining business goals such as long-term economic performance with respect for people and the environment. Roanoke Cement’s vision is to be recognized as a leading enterprise in its industry on sustainability and environmental stewardship. It implements this vision by monitoring its environmental performance and continually making improvements. Environmental Challenges and Opportunities After evaluating the cement-making process with programs and procedures in place to mitigate potentially adverse effects on the environment, RCC pinpointed mineral extraction, energy consumption, and air quality as areas with the greatest impact. Correspondingly, plant managers and staff meet biweekly to discuss progress in these areas, as well as possible developing problems. These meetings allow RCC’s team to identify areas of improvement and adjust accordingly. Cement manufacturing has only one by-product – cement kiln dust. It was thought years ago that this product could not be used in any other application; however, recently the industry has learned that the material can be consumed in producing masonry cements.
  • The Fashion Industry As a Slippery Discursive Site: Tracing the Lines of Flight Between Problem and Intervention

    The Fashion Industry As a Slippery Discursive Site: Tracing the Lines of Flight Between Problem and Intervention

    THE FASHION INDUSTRY AS A SLIPPERY DISCURSIVE SITE: TRACING THE LINES OF FLIGHT BETWEEN PROBLEM AND INTERVENTION Nadia K. Dawisha A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Communication in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2016 Approved by: Patricia Parker Sarah Dempsey Steve May Michael Palm Neringa Klumbyte © 2016 Nadia K. Dawisha ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Nadia K. Dawisha: The Fashion Industry as a Slippery Discursive Site: Tracing the Lines of Flight Between Problem and Intervention (Under the direction of Dr. Patricia Parker) At the intersection of the glamorous façade of designer runway shows, such as those in Paris, Milan and New York, and the cheap prices at the local Walmart and Target, is the complicated, somewhat insidious “business” of the fashion industry. It is complicated because it both exploits and empowers, sometimes through the very same practices; it is insidious because its most exploitative practices are often hidden, reproduced, and sustained through a consumer culture in which we are all in some ways complicit. Since fashion’s inception, people and institutions have employed a myriad of discursive strategies to ignore and even justify their complicity in exploitative labor, environmental degradation, and neo-colonial practices. This dissertation identifies and analyzes five predicaments of fashion while locating the multiple interventions that engage various discursive spaces in the fashion industry. Ultimately, the analysis of discursive strategies by creatives, workers, organizers, and bloggers reveals the existence of agile interventions that are as nuanced as the problem, and that can engage with disciplinary power in all these complicated places.
  • Sustainable Development of What? Contesting Global Development Concepts and Measures

    Sustainable Development of What? Contesting Global Development Concepts and Measures

    23 August 2011 Words 6,987/ References 1,537 (total 8,524) Sustainable development of what? Contesting global development concepts and measures Su-ming Khoo School of Political Science & Sociology, National University of Ireland, Galway Introduction Whether we are trying to find out if a particular development situation is sustainable, assess a development trend for sustainability, or compare development performance of different countries or regions, we have inevitably to ask the question: sustainable development of what? This chapter explores efforts to define, measure and compare aspects of development at the global level. The starting point is the proposition that the meanings and definitions of sustainable development are neither static, nor given. Sustainable development has been called a contestable concept, containing competing interpretations and ideas (Jacobs 1991). ‘Sustainability’ is a boundary term, signifying complex interactions between science, politics, policymaking and development (Scoones 2010, 153-4). ‘Development’ is similarly emergent and contested, with different understandings emerging over time and space. This fluidity has allowed different actors to redefine and manipulate the term ‘sustainable development’ to suit their own agendas (Krueger & Gibb 2007, 8). Sustainable development must gain intellectual clarity and rigour and give up politically expedient fuzziness, if it is to have an impact (Lélé 1991, 607). The conceptual and empirical challenges converge in concerns with measurement - ‘if sustainability is to mean anything, it must be measurable’ (Hamilton & Atkinson 2006, xi). Debates about the meaning and measurement of sustainable development are usually situated within efforts to ‘green’ national accounting. These debates appear somewhat technical, but questions concerning what measures to choose and how to integrate different measures reflect profound, even radical efforts to redefine how societies think about, and value, social progress and wealth.
  • Transformation to Enterprise Sustainability Case Studies of Manufacturing and Service Enterprise in Thailand

    Transformation to Enterprise Sustainability Case Studies of Manufacturing and Service Enterprise in Thailand

    TRANSFORMATION TO ENTERPRISE SUSTAINABILITY CASE STUDIES OF MANUFACTURING AND SERVICE ENTERPRISE IN THAILAND Chavatip Chindavijak Kasetsart University, Thailand [email protected] Kongkiti Phusavat Kasetsart University, Thailand [email protected] Pekka Kess Oulu University, Finland [email protected] Suparerk Sooksamarn Kasetsart Univesity, Thailand [email protected] Abstract: Emerging literature on enterprise sustainability suggests that all types of enterprise may adopt “Triple Bottom Line” approach to facilitate enterprise to sustainability. However, there is still a relatively limited understanding of how such sustainability might be implemented and measured in enterprise practice including manufacturing industry as well as especially in service industry. This paper presents preliminary findings from a case study of Thailand enterprises that play key role to supply product and service to the larger manufacturing company and corporation. Learning from the case study provides interesting insights into the drivers, enablers, and some unanticipated additional benefits of service industry sustainability measurement beyond the compliance, and so contributes to extending the existing body of knowledge. Keywords: Enterprise Sustainability, Enterprise Sustainability Measurement, Sustainability in Service Sector, Strategic Sustainability in Small and Medium Enterprise 121 1.0 Introduction Most of enterprise executives know sustainability challenge will shuffle the business from leader to loser depend on how they response to this changes. The way to create value creation will be changed to align with sustainability principle. In fact, based on the academic and practitioner implication, the sustainability must be the critical issues for enterprise to position themselves to survive for their economic benefit and also creating environmental and social value simultaneously. As known that sustainability performance is now generally understood as the combination of economic, social, and environmental performance.
  • Social and Environmental Enterprises in the Green Economy: Supporting Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication on the Ground

    Social and Environmental Enterprises in the Green Economy: Supporting Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication on the Ground

    Social and Environmental Enterprises in the Green Economy: Supporting sustainable development and poverty eradication on the ground Analysis of a 3 year study for policy makers Report produced by Heather Creech, Gabriel A. Huppé, Leslie Paas and Vivek Voora, IISD (May 2012) © 2012 World Conservation Monitoring Centre Published by the SEED Initiative and the International Institute for Sustainable Development The SEED Initiative is a global partnership for action on sustainable development and the green economy. Founded by UNEP, UNDP and IUCN at the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, SEED supports innovative small scale and locally driven entrepreneurships around the globe which integrate social and environmental benefits into their business model. SEED is hosted by the UNEP/World Conservation Monitoring Centre. Current partners include the United Nations Environ- ment Programme (UNEP), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature); European Union; the governments of Germany, India, the Netherlands, South Africa, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States of America; Conservation International; and Hisense. The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) contributes to sustainable development by advancing policy rec- ommendations on international trade and investment, economic policy, climate change, measurement and assessment, and natu- ral resources management, and the enabling role of communication technologies in these areas. Through the Internet, we report on international negotiations and share knowledge gained through collaborative projects with global partners, resulting in more rigorous research, capacity building in developing countries and better dialogue between North and South. IISD‘s vision is better living for all—sustainably; its mission is to champion innovation, enabling societies to live sustainably.
  • On the Economics of Ecosystem Services

    On the Economics of Ecosystem Services

    On the Economics of Ecosystem Services Draft 2 Huib Silvis en Martijn van der Heide Commissioned by the Netherlands WOT Natuur en Milieu 1. Introduction 1.1 Objectives 1.2 Context 1.3 Structure of this report 2. Classification of ecosystem services 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Typology of ecosystem services 2.3 Ecosystem services and ecosystem dis-services 3. From pre-classical economics to modern economics 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Pre-classical economics 3.3 Classical economics 3.4 Neo-classical economics 3.5 Modern economics 4. Insights from environmental and ecological economics 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Reasoning of environmental economics 4.3 Market failures 4.4 Criticisms from ecological economics 5. Valuation of ecosystem services 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Categories of values and the concept of total economic value 5.3 Monetary valuation ecosystem services 6. Policy analysis and design 6.1 Tools 6.2 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) 6.3 Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) 6.4 Multi Criteria Analysis (MCA) 6.5 Safe minimum standards approach and the precautionary principle 6.6 Design References Annex: Methods for valuing ecosystem services 1 1. Introduction 1.1 Objectives In economic terms ecosystems must be regarded as a special form of capital assets. Like reproducible capital assets (roads, buildings, and machinery), ecosystems depreciate if they are misused or are overused. But ecosystems differ from reproducible capital assets in several ways. Depreciation of natural capital may be irreversible, or the systems take a long time to recover. Generally speaking, it isn’t possible to replace a depleted or degraded ecosystem by a new one.
  • Empower Women, Save the Planet? Science, Strategy, and Population-Environment Advocacy

    Empower Women, Save the Planet? Science, Strategy, and Population-Environment Advocacy

    Empower Women, Save the Planet? Science, Strategy, and Population-Environment Advocacy By Jade Sasser A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy & Management in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Nancy Lee Peluso, Chair Professor Louise Fortmann Professor Carolyn Finney Professor Lawrence Cohen Spring 2012 Empower Women, Save the Planet? Science, Strategy, and Population-Environment Advocacy © 2012 by Jade Sasser Abstract Empower Women, Save the Planet? Science, Strategy, and Population-Environment Advocacy by Jade Sasser Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy, and Management University of California, Berkeley Professor Nancy Peluso, Chair This dissertation is about the problems of global population and women’s fertility as constructed, circulated and contested among a network of American environmental actors. The first decade of the new millennium witnessed an upsurge in environmentalist attention to population trends, particularly in the context of widespread attention to climate change. Using ethnographic research conducted among a network of U.S. foreign aid donors, environmental, population and family planning NGO managers, and college youth activists, this dissertation asks the questions: What- and who- is driving the renewed focus on population growth as a driver of ecological crisis? What strategies are being used to drive a linked population-environment development agenda forward, and what effects do these strategies have on population science, policy, and political debates? I argue that, rather than reprise familiar neo-Malthusian arguments, these actors draw on scientific knowledge and social justice frameworks, to position population- environment advocacy in the realm of progressive politics.