DOCSLIB.ORG

Primary Health Care

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Primary Health Care The World Health Report 2008 Primary Health Care SERVICE DELIVERY REFORMS PUBLIC UNIVERSAL POLICY COVERAGE REFORMS REFORMS Now LEADERSHIP More REFORMS Than Ever couverture_cor.indd xx-1 16.9.2008 17:07:31 couverture_cor.indd 2-3 16.9.2008 17:07:34 The World Health Report 2008 Primary Health Care Now More Than Ever WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data The world health report 2008 : primary health care now more than ever. 1.World health – trends. 2.Primary health care – trends. 3.Delivery of health care. 4.Health policy. I.World Health Organization. ISBN 978 92 4 156373 4 (NLM classifi cation: W 84.6) ISSN 1020-3311 © World Health Organization 2008 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specifi c companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. Information concerning this publication can be obtained from: World Health Report World Health Organization 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] Copies of this publication can be ordered from: [email protected] The World Health Report 2008 was produced under the overall direction of Tim Evans (Assistant Director-General) and Wim Van Lerberghe (editor-in-chief). The principal writing team consisted of Wim Van Lerberghe, Tim Evans, Kumanan Rasanathan and Abdelhay Mechbal. Other main contributors to the drafting of the report were: Anne Andermann, David Evans, Benedicte Galichet, Alec Irwin, Mary Kay Kindhauser, Remo Meloni, Thierry Mertens, Charles Mock, Hernan Montenegro, Denis Porignon and Dheepa Rajan. Organizational supervision of the report was provided by Ramesh Shademani. Contributions in the form of boxes, fi gures and data analysis came from: Alayne Adams, Jonathan Abrahams, Fiifi Amoako Johnson, Giovanni Ancona, Chris Bailey, Robert Beaglehole, Henk Bekedam, Andre Biscaia, Paul Bossyns, Eric Buch, Andrew Cassels, Somnath Chatterji, Mario Dal Poz, Pim De Graaf, Jan De Maeseneer, Nick Drager, Varatharajan Durairaj, Joan Dzenowagis, Dominique Egger, Ricardo Fabregas, Paulo Ferrinho, Daniel Ferrante, Christopher Fitzpatrick, Gauden Galea, Claudia Garcia Moreno, André Griekspoor, Lieve Goeman, Miriam Hirschfeld, Ahmadreza Hosseinpoor, Justine Hsu, Chandika Indikadahena, Mie Inoue, Lori Irwin, Andre Isakov, Michel Jancloes, Miloud Kaddar, Hyppolite Kalambaye, Guy Kegels, Meleckidzedeck Khayesi, Ilona Kickbush, Yohannes Kinfu, Tord Kjellstrom, Rüdiger Krech, Mohamed Laaziri, Colin Mathers, Zoe Matthews, Maureen Mackintosh, Di McIntyre, David Meddings, Pierre Mercenier, Pat Neuwelt, Paolo Piva, Annie Portela, Yongyut Ponsupap, Amit Prasad, Rob Ridley, Ritu Sadana, David Sanders, Salif Samake, Gerard Schmets, Iqbal Shah, Shaoguang Wang, Anand Sivasankara Kurup, Kenji Shibuya, Michel Thieren, Nicole Valentine, Nathalie Van de Maele, Jeanette Vega, Jeremy Veillard and Bob Woollard. Valuable inputs in the form of contributions, peer reviews, suggestions and criticisms were received from the Regional Directors and their staff, from the Deputy Director-General, Anarfi Asamoah Bah, and from the Assistant Directors-General. The draft report was peer reviewed at a meeting in Montreux, Switzerland, with the following participants: Azrul Azwar, Tim Evans, Ricardo Fabrega, Sheila Campbell-Forrester, Antonio Duran, Alec Irwin, Mohamed Ali Jaffer, Safurah Jaafar, Pongpisut Jongudomsuk, Joseph Kasonde, Kamran Lankarini, Abdelhay Mechbal, John Martin, Donald Matheson, Jan De Maeseneer, Ravi Narayan, Sydney Saul Ndeki, Adrian Ong, Pongsadhorn Pokpermdee, Thomson Prentice, Kumanan Rasanathan, Salman Rawaf, Bijan Sadrizadeh, Hugo Sanchez, Ramesh Shademani, Barbara Starfi eld, Than Tun Sein, Wim Van Lerberghe, Olga Zeus and Maria Hamlin Zuniga. The report benefi ted greatly from the inputs of the following participants in a one-week workshop in Bellagio, Italy: Ahmed Abdullatif, Chris Bailey, Douglas Bettcher, John Bryant, Tim Evans, Marie Therese Feuerstein, Abdelhay Mechbal, Thierry Mertens, Hernan Montenegro, Ronald Labonte, Socrates Litsios, Thelma Narayan, Thomson Prentice, Kumanan Rasanathan, Myat Htoo Razak, Ramesh Shademani, Viroj Tangcharoensathien, Wim Van Lerberghe, Jeanette Vega and Jeremy Veillard. WHO working groups provided the initial inputs into the report. These working groups, of both HQ and Regional staff included: Shelly Abdool, Ahmed Abdullatif, Shambhu Acharya, Chris Bailey, James Bartram, Douglas Bettcher, Eric Blas, Ties Boerma, Robert Bos, Marie-Charlotte Boueseau, Gui Carrin, Venkatraman Chandra-Mouli, Yves Chartier, Alessandro Colombo, Carlos Corvalan, Bernadette Daelmans, Denis Daumerie, Tarun Dua, Joan Dzenowagis, David Evans, Tim Evans, Bob Fryatt, Michelle Funk, Chad Gardner, Giuliano Gargioni, Gulin Gedik, Sandy Gove, Kersten Gutschmidt, Alex Kalache, Alim Khan, Ilona Kickbusch, Yunkap Kwankam, Richard Laing, Ornella Lincetto, Daniel Lopez-Acuna, Viviana Mangiaterra, Colin Mathers, Michael Mbizvo, Abdelhay Mechbal, Kamini Mendis, Shanthi Mendis, Susan Mercado, Charles Mock, Hernan Montenegro, Catherine Mulholland, Peju Olukoya, Annie Portela, Thomson Prentice, Annette Pruss-Ustun, Kumanan Rasanathan, Myat Htoo Razak, Lina Tucker Reinders, Elil Renganathan, Gojka Roglic, Michael Ryan, Shekhar Saxena, Robert Scherpbier, Ramesh Shademani, Kenji Shibuya, Sameen Siddiqi, Orielle Solar, Francisco Songane, Claudia Stein, Kwok-Cho Tang, Andreas Ullrich, Mukund Uplekar, Wim Van Lerberghe, Jeanette Vega, Jeremy Veillard, Eugenio Villar, Diana Weil and Juliana Yartey. The editorial production team was led by Thomson Prentice, managing editor. The report was edited by Diana Hopkins, assisted by Barbara Campanini. Gaël Kernen assisted on graphics and produced the web site version and other electronic media. Lina Tucker Reinders provided editorial advice. The index was prepared by June Morrison. Administrative support in the preparation of the report was provided by Saba Amdeselassie, Maryse Coutty, Melodie Fadriquela, Evelyne Omukubi and Christine Perry. Photo credits: Director-General’s photograph: WHO (p. viii); introduction and overview: WHO/Marco Kokic (p. x); chapters 1–6: Alayne Adams (p. 1); WHO/Christopher Black (p. 23); WHO/Karen Robinson (p. 41); International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies/John Haskew (p. 63); Alayne Adams (p. 81); WHO/Thomas Moran (p. 99). Design: Reda Sadki Layout: Steve Ewart and Reda Sadki Figures: Christophe Grangier Printing Coordination: Pascale Broisin and Frédérique Robin-Wahlin Printed in Switzerland The World Health Report 2008 Primary Health Care – Now More Than Ever Contents Message from the Director-General viii Introduction and Overview xi Responding to the challenges of a changing world xii Growing expectations for better performance xiii From the packages of the past to the reforms of the future xiv Four sets of PHC reforms xvi Seizing opportunities xviii Chapter 1. The challenges of a changing world 1 Unequal growth, unequal outcomes 2 Longer lives and better health, but not everywhere 2 Growth and stagnation 4 Adapting to new health challenges 7 A globalized, urbanized and ageing world 7 Little anticipation and slow reactions 9 Trends that undermine the health systems’ response 11 Hospital-centrism: health systems built around hospitals and specialists 11 Fragmentation: health systems built around priority programmes 12 Health systems left to drift towards unregulated commercialization 13 Changing values and rising expectations 14 Health equity 15 Care that puts people fi rst 16 Securing the health of communities 16 Reliable, responsive health authorities 17 Participation 18 PHC reforms: driven by demand 18 Chapter 2. Advancing and sustaining universal coverage 23 The central place of health equity in PHC 24 Moving towards universal coverage 25 Challenges in moving towards universal coverage 27 Rolling out primary-care networks to fi ll the availability gap 28 Overcoming the isolation of dispersed populations 30 Providing alternatives to unregulated commercial services 31 Targeted interventions to complement universal coverage mechanisms 32 Mobilizing for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stakeholders' Perceptions of Policy Options to Support the Integration Of
    Ajuebor et al. Human Resources for Health (2019) 17:13 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0348-6 RESEARCH Open Access Stakeholders’ perceptions of policy options to support the integration of community health workers in health systems Onyema Ajuebor1* , Giorgio Cometto1, Mathieu Boniol1 and Elie A. Akl2 Abstract Background: Community health workers (CHWs) are an important component of the health workforce in many countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed a guideline to support the integration of CHWs into health systems. This study assesses stakeholders’ valuation of outcomes of interest, acceptability and feasibility of policy options considered for the CHW guideline development. Methods: A cross-sectional mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative) study targeting stakeholders involved directly or indirectly in country implementation of CHW programmes was conducted in 2017. Data was collected from 96 stakeholders from five WHO regions using an online questionnaire. A Likert scale (1 to 9) was used to grade participants’ assessments of the outcomes of interest, and the acceptability and feasibility of policy options were considered. Results: All outcomes of interest were considered by at least 90% of participants as ‘important’ or ‘critical’. Most critical outcomes were ‘improved quality of CHW health services’ and ‘increased health service coverage’ (91.5% and 86.2% participants judging them as ‘critical’ respectively). Out of 40 policy options, 35 were considered as ‘definitely acceptable’ and 36 ‘definitely feasible’ by most participants. The least acceptable option (37% of participants rating ‘definitely not acceptable’) was the selection of candidates based on age. The least feasible option (29% of participants rating ‘definitely not feasible’) was the selection of CHWs with a minimum of secondary education.
    [Show full text]
  • (Pasr) Bio 3R Project “Bioterrorism Resilience, Research, Reaction”
    BIO3R Supporting Activity Title: Scenario Launching Report Id: <BIO3R reference> Version: 1.0 PREPARATORY ACTION IN SECURITY AND RESEEARCH (PASR) BIO 3R PROJECT “BIOTERRORISM RESILIENCE, RESEARCH, REACTION” OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS 1.1 GENERAL OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS The issues discussed hereafter are concerning the global response to BioT crises. They are relevant for all nine scenarios. 1.1.1 Crisis management at the national level Perception of the BioT risk in the different MSs The organisation of response to BioT events varies significantly between the MSs. Differences related to the political history, the economic development, or demography and geography could probably be addressed in a specific study. Major differences in the level of preparedness are also observed between SMs with similar economical, demographic and geographical constraints. The best prepared MSs have developed comprehensive global BioT plans, while others have only BioT plans restricted for example to protocols for the treatment of suspect parcels. It appears that the perception of the BioT risk differs significantly from one MS to another. The rationale for these differences is unclear. It deserves further analysis, as the harmonization and coordination of the response at the European level requires a consensus among MSs about the priorities in health security. “Natural” resilience of Public Health System The lack of global BioT emergency plans does not necessarily means that resilience will be low in any case. The general robustness of European medical care systems together with the plans already existing or specifically developed for the response to “naturally” occurring outbreaks or major national incident or international cooperation in major crisis may provide efficient response to several scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Framework Convention on Global Health: a Transformative Agenda for Global Health Justice
    Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics Volume 13 Issue 1 Article 1 2013 Towards a Framework Convention on Global Health: A Transformative Agenda for Global Health Justice Lawrence 0. Gostin Eric A. Friedman Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjhple Part of the Health Law and Policy Commons, and the Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons Recommended Citation Lawrence 0. Gostin & Eric A. Friedman, Towards a Framework Convention on Global Health: A Transformative Agenda for Global Health Justice, 13 YALE J. HEALTH POL'Y L. & ETHICS (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjhple/vol13/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics by an authorized editor of Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gostin and Friedman: Towards a Framework Convention on Global Health: ARTICLESA Transformative Towards a Framework Convention on Global Health: A Transformative Agenda for Global Health Justice t Lawrence 0. Gostin* & Eric A. Friedman" ABSTRACT: Global health inequities cause nearly 20 million deaths annually, mostly among the world's poor. Yet international law currently does little to reduce the massive inequalities that underlie these deaths. This Article offers the first systematic account of the goals and justifications, normative foundations, and potential construction of a proposed new global health treaty, a Framework Convention on Global Health (FCGH), grounded in the human right to health.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Health Care and Family Medicine
    Genera of l P Daboul and Al-Faham, J Gen Pract 2013, 1:1 l r a a n c r t DOI: 10.4172/2329-9126.1000e102 u i c o e J Journal of General Practice ISSN: 2329-9126 EditorialResearch Article OpenOpen Access Access Primary Health Care and Family Medicine Mohammed Wael Daboul* and Zaid Al-Faham Mohammed Wael Daboul, Daboul Medical Laboratory, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic Definition of Primary Health Care • Insufficient Political commitment. Practical, scientifically sound, and socially acceptable method and • Weak linkages between PHC and mobilized community. technology; universally accessible to all in the community through • Inadequate distribution of resources (human and non-human). their full participation; at an affordable cost; and geared toward self- reliance and self determination (WHO & UNICEF, 1978). • Deteriorated physical infrastructure- water-sewage systems & environmental degradation [2]. Primary health care is primary care applied on a population level. As a population strategy, it requires the commitment of governments • Limited institutional and human resources capacity building, to develop a population-oriented set of primary care services in the and lack of an electronic health information system. context of other levels and types of services. • Moving obstacles from hospital oriented health system to Primary Health Care exists to provide high quality and cost effective primary health care (health professionals, community, etc.). promotive, preventive, curative and rehabilitative health care services
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking Universal Health Coverage: 2017 Global Monitoring Report Tracking Universal Health Coverage: 2017 Global Monitoring Report
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized ISBN 978 92 4 151355 5 http://www.who.int/healthinfo/universal_health_coverage/report/2017/en/ Public Disclosure Authorized Tracking Universal Health Coverage: http://www.worldbank.org/health 2017 Global Monitoring Report Tracking Universal Health Coverage: 2017 Global Monitoring Report Tracking universal health coverage: 2017 global monitoring report ISBN 978-92-4-151355-5 © World Health Organization and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 2017 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO or The World Bank endorse any specic organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo or The World Bank logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO) or The World Bank. WHO and The World Bank are not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization.
    [Show full text]
  • World Report on Health Policy and Systems Research
    World report on health policy and systems research ISBN 978-92-4-151226-8 © World Health Organization 2017 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. World report on health policy and systems research. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data. CIP data are available at http://apps.who.int/iris. Sales, rights and licensing. To purchase WHO publications, see http://apps.who.int/bookorders. To submit requests for commercial use and queries on rights and licensing, see http://www.who.int/about/licensing.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Care Workforce
    Primary Care Workforce Primary Care Workforce Health Care Safety-Net Toolkit for Legislators Primary Care Workforce Introduction The primary care workforce delivers essential primary and pre- ventive health care to a population that is increasingly demand- ing these services. Access to appropriate primary care services is important to maintaining and improving health. Those who obtain regular primary care receive more preventive services, are more likely to comply with their prescribed treatments, and have lower rates of illness and premature death, according to research.1 Effective primary care is comprehensive, coordinated, timely, and patient-centered and can result in better health for the patient, fewer avoidable hospitalizations and emergency room visits and lower costs. Despite the benefits of a high-quality primary nology adaptation, provide new challenges for the care system, the reality is that today’s primary care existing workforce. workforce is struggling to meet current demand for services—and the unmet needs are expected to This primer provides an overview of the issues intensify as a result of demographic changes, cov- and challenges facing the primary care workforce. erage expansions due to the Affordable Care Act It also contains policy options and actions that (ACA), and a decline in the primary care physician states have adopted to address gaps and strengthen workforce. At the same time, reforms and quality the primary care workforce’s capacity to meet the improvements, such as health information tech- growing demand
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Health Care Policy and Vision for Community Pharmacy and Pharmacists in Jordan
    Basheti IA, Mhaidat NM, Alqudah R, Nassar R, Othman B, Mukattash TL. Primary health care policy and vision for community pharmacy and pharmacists in Jordan. Pharmacy Practice 2020 Oct-Dec;18(4):2184. https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2020.4.2184 International Series: Integration of community pharmacy in primary health care Primary health care policy and vision for community pharmacy and pharmacists in Jordan Iman A. BASHETI , Nizar M. MHAIDAT , Rajaa ALQUDAH , Razan NASSAR , Bayan OTHMAN , Tareq L. MUKATTASH . Published online: 5-Dec-2020 Abstract Jordan is considered a low middle-income country with a population of 9.956 million in 2018. It is considered the training center for healthcare professions in the region, as the Jordanian healthcare sector has seen remarkable development. In 2017, the expenditure on health as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was estimated to be around 8%. The healthcare sector is divided into two main sectors; the public and the private sector with both including hospitals, primary care clinics and pharmacies. The Jordanian government has a strong commitment to health and educational programs; hence, an increase in the number of pharmacy schools and pharmacy graduates has occurred in the past few years. Health authorities, such as the Jordan Food and Drug Association (JFDA) and the Jordan Pharmaceutical Association (JPA) have played an important role in ensuring the availability and affordability of medications, and has influenced the practice of pharmacists. Protecting the pharmaceutical market and professional interests, preserving pharmacists' rights, building needed cooperation with the internal federation, and maintaining professional ethics are some of the ) license objectives for the JPA.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Health Organization and the Globalization of Chronic Noncommunicable Disease
    1 The World Health Organization and the Globalization of Chronic Noncommunicable Disease George Weisz, PhD, McGill University Etienne Vignola-Gagné, Dr. Phil., McGill University George Weisz is Cotton-Hannah Professor of the History of Medicine at McGill University. Etienne Vignola-Gagné is a Postdoctoral Fellow at McGill University This is an early draft of an article that has subsequently been published in Population and Development Review. Complete citation information for the final version of the paper, as published in the print edition of Population and Development Review, is available on Wiley Interscience’s online journal service, accessible via the journal’s website at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/pdr.” 2 Abstract Chronic noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have recently provoked a surge of public interest. This paper examines the policy literature, notably the archives and publications of the World Health Organization (WHO), which has dominated this field, to analyze the emergence and consolidation of this new agenda. Starting with programs to control cardiovascular disease in the 1970s, experts from eastern and western Europe had by the late 1980s consolidated a program for the prevention of NCDs risk factors at the WHO. NCDs remained a relatively minor concern until the collaboration of World Bank health economists with WHO epidemiologists lead to the Global Burden of Disease study that provided an “evidentiary breakthrough” for NCD activism by quantifying the extent of the problem. Soon after, WHO itself, facing severe criticism, underwent major reform. NDC advocacy contributed to revitalizing the WHO’s normative and coordinative functions. By leading a growing advocacy coalition, within which The Lancet played a key role, WHO established itself as a leading institution in this domain.
    [Show full text]
  • A Scoping Study of Emergency Planning and Management in Health Care: What Further Research Is Needed?
    National Institute for Health Research Service Delivery and Organisation Programme A scoping study of emergency planning and management in health care: What further research is needed? Alan Boyd,1 Naomi Chambers,1 Simon French,1 Russell King,2 Duncan Shaw,3 and Alison Whitehead4 1 Manchester Business School 2 Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust 3 Aston University Business School 4 Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust Published July 2012 This project is funded by the Service Delivery and Organisation Programme Address for correspondence: Alan Boyd Manchester Business School Booth Street West Manchester M15 6PB Email: [email protected] This report should be referenced as follows: Boyd A, Chambers N, French S, King RA, Shaw D, Whitehead AS. A scoping study of emergency planning and management in health care: What further research is needed? Final report. NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research programme; 2012. Relationship statement: This document is an output from a research project that was funded by the NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation (SDO) programme based at the National Institute for Health Research Evaluations, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre (NETSCC) at the University of Southampton. The management of the project and subsequent editorial review of the final report was undertaken by the NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation (SDO) programme. From January 2012, the NIHR SDO programme merged with the NIHR Health Services Research (NIHR HSR) programme to establish the new NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research (NIHR HS&DR) programme. Should you have any queries please contact [email protected]. Copyright information: This report may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mistreatment of Women During Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: a Mixed-Methods Systematic Review
    RESEARCH ARTICLE The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review Meghan A. Bohren1,2*, Joshua P. Vogel2, Erin C. Hunter3, Olha Lutsiv4, Suprita K. Makh5, João Paulo Souza6, Carolina Aguiar1, Fernando Saraiva Coneglian6, Alex Luíz Araújo Diniz6, Özge Tunçalp2, Dena Javadi3, Olufemi T. Oladapo2, Rajat Khosla2, Michelle J. Hindin1,2, A. Metin Gülmezoglu2 1 Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America, 2 Department of Reproductive Health and Research including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 3 Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America, 4 Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 5 Population Services International, Washington, D. C., United States of America, 6 Department of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil OPEN ACCESS * [email protected] Citation: Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, et al. (2015) The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLoS Abstract Med 12(6): e1001847. doi:10.1371/journal. pmed.1001847 Academic Editor: Rachel Jewkes, Medical Research Council, SOUTH AFRICA Background Received: November 18, 2014 Despite growing recognition of neglectful, abusive, and disrespectful treatment of women Accepted: May 22, 2015 during childbirth in health facilities, there is no consensus at a global level on how these occurrences are defined and measured.
    [Show full text]
  • Module 5: Healthcare Delivery Systems TRANSCRIPT
    Module 5: Healthcare Delivery Systems TRANSCRIPT The Healthcare Systems module is one of a series created through funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Association for Prevention, Teaching and Research. US Healthcare Delivery Systems Developed through the APTR Initiative to Enhance Prevention and Population Health Education in collaboration with the Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University with funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention APTR wishes to acknowledge the following individuals that developed this module: Joseph Nicholas, MD, MPH University of Rochester School of Medicine Anna Zendell, PhD, MSW Center for Public Health Continuing Education University at Albany School of Public Health Mary Applegate, MD, MPH University at Albany School of Public Health Cheryl Reeves, MS, MLS Center for Public Health Continuing Education University at Albany School of Public Health This education module is made possible through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research (APTR) Cooperative Agreement, No. 5U50CD300860. The module represents the opinions of the author(s) and does not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. The objectives of this presentation are as follows: 1. List the major sectors of the US healthcare system 2. Describe the interactions among elements of the 1. List the major sectors of the US healthcare system healthcare system, with attention to the relationships 2. Describe interactions among elements of the between clinical practice and public health healthcare system, including clinical practice and public health 3.
    [Show full text]