The Reception of John of Damascus in the Summa Halensis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Reception of John of Damascus in the Summa Halensis RichardCross The Reception of John of Damascus in the Summa Halensis Abstract: John of Damascus was perhaps the most important Christian encyclopedist of late antiquity.His influencecrops up in two distinct ways in the Summa. He is an authority to be cited in support of positions adopted in the Summa,and sometimes the inspiration of thoseteachings;and he is an authority whose apparentlydeviant positions need to be givenacceptable interpretations. Of the times that John is men- tioned, his name crops up in association with some very distinctive issues: on the positive side, the will and passions (and action theory more generally), and the ac- counts of providence, faith, and images; and on the negative side, divine simplicity and associated epistemic and semantic questions, the Trinity,and the prelapsarian human condition. This chapter,accordingly, divides the material up in twoways: first,examining cases in which John clearlyinfluenced the authors of the Summa, albeit not always unproblematically; and,secondly, examining those problematic cases in which John presents aposition apparentlyinconflict with thatadopted by the authorsofthe Summa. John of Damascus (d. c. 750) wasperhapsthe most important Christian encyclopedist of late antiquity.¹ He summarized, through extensive quotation, almostthe whole of the dogmatic heritageofthe Greek-speakingtheologians from the Cappadocians to Maximus the Confessor,and wasthe chief sourcefor knowledge of these theolo- gians’ thinking in the medievalwest.Asweshall see, texts from Gregory of Nazian- zus, Nemesius of Emesa, and Maximus, mediated through John, turn out to be par- ticularlysignificant for the Summa Halensis,asdoJohn’sown contributions to the Iconoclast controversy.John’s De fide orthodoxa or Expositio fidei,the Summa’s source, exists in two Latin translations: areasonablyaccurate one by Burgundio of Pisa, probablydating from 1153 to 1154,and an incompleteone (cc. 45 – 52 only, material on the metaphysics of the Incarnation) by Cerbanus the Hungarian, proba- blydone some ten or more years before Burgundio’s. Burgundio’simmediatelybe- came the standard version.² Foranoverview of John’slife, work, and thought, see AndrewLouth, John Damascene: Tradition and Originality in Byzantine Theology (Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 2002). See Eligius M. Buytaert, ‘Introduction,’ in John of Damascus, De fide orthodoxa:Versions of Burgun- dio and Cerbanus,ed. Eligius M. Buytaert,Franciscan InstitutePublications, Text Series,8(StBona- venture, NY:Franciscan Institute; Louvain: Nauwelaerts; Paderborn: Schöningh,1955). Forthe Greek text,see John of Damascus, Die Schriften des Johannes von Damaskos,vol. 2, Expositio fidei,ed. Bo- nifatius Kotter,Patristische Texteund Studien, 12 (Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 1973). Thereare OpenAccess. ©2020 Lydia Schumacher,published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative CommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685022-007 72 Richard Cross John crops up in two distinct ways in the Summa. He is an authority to be cited in support of positions adopted in the Summa,and sometimes indeed seemingly the in- spiration of those teachings;and he is an authority whose apparentlydeviant (i.e. (frequently) non-Augustinian) positions need to be givenacceptable interpretations. This dialectic oftenshows up in the positioning of the relevant texts:inthe argu- ments pro,orinthe ad oppositum;and not infrequentlyone of John’stexts is used as acorrective of another.(There is nothing unusual about the Summa in this respect; we could find the sameinany writer’suse of John, and indeedofauthorities in gen- eral, at least in the medievalwest.) John’spresenceisnotable but not absolutelypervasive in the Summa: Icounted over 700mentions—somewhat comparable with Aristotle (‘The Philosopher’)atup- wards of 500,but well belowthe 5,000 or so citations of Augustine. Of the times that John is mentioned, his name crops up in association with some very distinctive is- sues: on the positive side, the willand passions (and action theory more generally), and the accounts of providence,faith, and images; and on the negative side, divine simplicity and associatedepistemic and semantic questions, the Trinity,and the pre- lapsarian human condition. In what follows, Ishallaccordingly divide the material up in two ways:first,examining cases in which John clearlyinfluenced the authors of the Summa,albeit not always unproblematically; and, secondly, examining those problematic cases in which John presents aposition apparentlyinconflict with that adopted by the authors of the Summa. John was an authority:the authors never sim- plyreject what he writes. Influence Action Theory Undeniablythe most significant locus for John’sinfluenceonthe Summa lies in the domainofactiontheory—in particular, theories of the will and the passions. John himself summarizes and adapts avast rangeofearlier philosophical and theological traditions. Philosophically, what John provides represents an attempt to integrate what Aristotle had to sayonactionwith the view thatthere is awill or rational ap- petite distinct from the various pre-rational appetites isolated by Aristotle.³ This led various English translations; IrefertoJohn of Damascus, Writings,trans. Frederic H. Chase, The Fa- thers of the Church, 37 (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press,1958). It is certainlypossible to arguethat Aristotle’saccount of appetite allows him to give an account that is functionallythe same as one that includes awill. But it is not the standardreading. Michael Frede has recentlyargued that the origin of the notion of will is Stoic, originatinginparticular in Epi- ctetus (see Michael Frede, AFreeWill: TheOrigin of the Notion in AncientThought,ed. A.A. Long (Ber- keley,CA: University of California Press, 2011), against the earlier claim that the notion is distinctively The Reception of John of Damascus in the SummaHalensis 73 John to posit acomplex sequence of seven psychological events involved in deliber- ate activity—asequence that was developed in great detail by Thomas Aquinas⁴—but the details of which the Summa’sauthors largely ignore.⁵ The theological background to John’sdiscussion is Christological: Maximus’ attempt to defend the existenceof two wills in Christ,adivinewill and ahuman will, against his so-called ‘monothe- lite’ opponents whose position was eventuallycondemned at the Third Council of Constantinople.⁶ Hereisthe problem: giventhat the human will is agenuine will, how do we secure that it is necessarilygood?Ireturn to the Christological issue in amoment,once Ihavelaid out the basic contours of the rather complex passage of ideas from Maximus to the Summa. Anumber of medieval accounts of appetite in general attempt to bring together the view that there are pre-rational appetites with the view thatthere is arational appetite. Forexample, Peter Lombardmaintained—doubtless following insights from Augustine—that there are two kinds of appetite in ahuman being:asensory one (sensualitas), and arationalone (voluntas—will).⁷ John himself uses aslightly different distinction between two kinds of appetite,one thathehas borrowed from Maximus: thelesis and boulesis,roughly,anatural inclinationtothe good, and ara- tional desire for thingssubject to choice.⁸ The authorsofthe Summa use John’sdis- tinctionasthe starting point for their own discussion: There is will as nature, and will as will, as John Damascene says:inother,Greek, words, θέλησις and βούλησις.Will as natureisageneral and indeterminateappetite. (…)[It]isimplanted into every power of the soul with respect to its act and object: so it is in the irascible power with respect to the arduous, in the concupiscible powerwith respect to the good, in the rational power with respect to the true.⁹ Here thelesis is the name of an inclination common to all the soul’spowers—an in- clination to the good. But it is also the name of apower,specificallyarational will Christian, and found first in Augustine (see Albrecht Dihle, TheTheoryofWill in Classical Antiquity (Berkeley,CA: University of California Press,1982)). See Thomas Aquinas, Summa theologiae I-II, qq. 11–17.Iuse the edition of Aquinas’ works edited by Robert Busa, found at http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html. On this,Michael Frede, ‘John of DamascusonHuman Action, the Will, and Human Freedom,’ in Byzantine Philosophy and its Ancient Sources,ed. Katerina Ierodiakonou (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002), 86–7. See Maximus, Ad Marinum (PG 91:28B-37 A). See Peter Lombard, Sententiae in IV libris distinctae (hereafter, Sent.)II, d. 24,cc. 3–4, 2vols,ed. Ignatius C. Brady, Spicilegium Bonaventurianum, 4–5(Grottaferrata: Editiones Collegii S. Bonaven- turae, 1971– 81), 1:452– 3. John of Damascus, Expositio fidei,c.36, ll. 51–83 (Kotter,89–91;Buytaert,135–7; Chase, 249); for thelesis,see Maximus, Ad Marinum (PG 91:12B); for boulesis,see Maximus, Ad Marinum (PG 91:13B). Alexander of Hales, Doctoris irrefragabilis Alexandri de Hales Ordinis minorum Summa theologica (SH),4vols (Quaracchi: Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1924–48) VolI,P1, In2, Tr1, Q4,C7(n. 326), pp. 479b-80a. 74 RichardCross that naturallyinclines to the supreme good, distinct from the rational deliberative will.¹⁰ The authorsuse this distinction of rational wills to explain how wrong- doing is compatible with the Aristotelianview thathuman beingsalways will the su- preme good (eudaimonia): According to Damascene, we should distinguish between the natural will, according to which all
Recommended publications
  • Origen of Alexandria and St. Maximus the Confessor: an Analysis and Critical Evaluation of Their Eschatological Doctrines
    Origen of Alexandria and St. Maximus the Confessor: An Analysis and Critical Evaluation of Their Eschatological Doctrines by Edward Moore ISBN: 1-58112-261-6 DISSERTATION.COM Boca Raton, Florida USA • 2005 Origen of Alexandria and St. Maximus the Confessor: An Analysis and Critical Evaluation of Their Eschatological Doctrines Copyright © 2004 Edward Moore All rights reserved. Dissertation.com Boca Raton, Florida USA • 2005 ISBN: 1-58112-261-6 Origen of Alexandria and St. Maximus the Confessor: An Analysis and Critical Evaluation of Their Eschatological Doctrines By Edward Moore, S.T.L., Ph.D. Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................VI ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................VII PREFACE.....................................................................................................................VIII INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 ORIGEN, MAXIMUS, AND THE IMPORTANCE OF ESCHATOLOGY ....................................... 1 THE HISTORY AND IMPORTANCE OF ESCHATOLOGY IN CHRISTIAN THOUGHT – SOME BRIEF REMARKS. ............................................................................................................. 3 CHAPTER 1: ORIGEN’S INTELLECTUAL BACKGROUND................................... 15 BRIEF BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Brian Mclaren, Finding Our Way Again: the Return of the Ancient Practices Michael A
    Recovering Ancient Church Practices: A Review of Brian McLaren, Finding Our Way Again: The Return of the Ancient Practices Michael A. G. Haykin Michael A. G. Haykin is Professor of In this introductory volume for a new living in our culture, the book has to be Church History at The Southern Baptist series being published by Thomas Nelson judged a failure. Theological Seminary. He is also Adjunct entitled “The Ancient Practices Series” First, it needs to be noted that stylisti- Professor of Church History at Toronto (that will include volumes on prayer, the cally the book reads well and McLaren Baptist Seminary in Ontario, Canada. Dr. Sabbath, and tithing), well-known author is alert to the latest modes of expression, Haykin is the author of One Heart and and speaker Brian McLaren sounds a call though I must admit some of them grated One Soul (Evangelical Press, 1994), for the recovery of some of the spiritual on this reader. His use of the word “sexy,” Spirit of God: The Exegesis of 1 and riches of our Christian past, in particular for example—“the sexy young word 2 Corinthians in the Pneumatomachian those associated with what are called the spiritual” (19)—is very much in tune with Controversy of the Fourth Century spiritual disciplines. In this regard, his the ways in which that word has come (Brill, 1994), and Jonathan Edwards: book, Finding Our Way Again: The Return of to be used, though I for one have trouble 1 The Holy Spirit and Revival (Evangelical the Ancient Practices, is part of an interest dissociating it from meaning actual sex- Press, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Islam and Christian Theologians
    • CTSA PROCEEDINGS 48 (1993): 41-54 • ISLAM AND CHRISTIAN THEOLOGIANS Once upon a time an itinerant grammarian came to a body of water and enlisted the services of a boatman to ferry him across. As they made their way, the grammarian asked the boatman, "Do you know the science of grammar?" The humble boatman thought for a moment and admitted somewhat dejectedly that he did not. Not much later, a growing storm began to imperil the small vessel. Said the boatman to the grammarian, "Do you know the science of swimming?" On the eve of the new millennium too much of our theological activity remains shockingly intramural. Instead of allowing an inherent energy to launch us into the larger reality of global religiosity, we insist on protecting our theology from the threat of contamination. If we continue to resist serious engagement with other theological traditions, and that of Islam in particular, our theology may prove as useful as grammar in a typhoon. But what would swimming look like in theological terms? In the words of Robert Neville, "One of the most important tasks of theology today is to develop strategies for determining how to enter into the meaning system of another tradition, not merely as a temporary member of that tradition, but in such a way as to see how they bear upon one another."1 I propose to approach this vast subject by describing the "Three M's" of Muslim-Christian theological engagement: Models (or methods from the past); Method (or a model for future experimentation); and Motives. I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chalcedonian Christology of St John Damascene : Philosophical Terminology and Theological Arguments
    Durham E-Theses The Chalcedonian Christology of St John Damascene : philosophical terminology and theological arguments Metallidis, George How to cite: Metallidis, George (2003) The Chalcedonian Christology of St John Damascene : philosophical terminology and theological arguments, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/1085/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM DEPARTMENT OF THEOLOGY GEORGE METALLIDIS The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consentand information derived from it should be acknowledged. The Chalcedonian Christology of St John Damascene: Philosophical Terminology and Theological Arguments PhD Thesis/FourthYear Supervisor: Prof. ANDREW LOUTH 0-I OCT2003 Durham 2003 The ChalcedonianChristology of St John Damascene To my Mother Despoina The ChalcedonianChristology of St John Damascene CONTENTS Page ABBREVIATIONS 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT 12 INTRODUCTION 14 CHAPTER ONE TheLife of St John Damascene 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Maximus the Confessor and His Defense of Papal Primacy
    Love that unites and vanishes: Saint Maximus the Confessor and his defense of papal primacy Author: Jason C. LaLonde Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:108614 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2019 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Love that Unites and Vanishes: Saint Maximus the Confessor and his Defense of Papal Primacy Thesis for the Completion of the Licentiate in Sacred Theology Boston College School of Theology and Ministry Fr. Jason C. LaLonde, S.J. Readers: Fr. Brian Dunkle, S.J., BC-STM Dr. Adrian Walker, Catholic University of America May 3, 2019 2 Introduction 3 Chapter One: Maximus’s Palestinian Provenance: Overcoming the Myth of the Greek Life 10 Chapter Two: From Monoenergism to Monotheletism: The Role of Honorius 32 Chapter Three: Maximus on Roman Primacy and his Defense of Honorius 48 Conclusion 80 Appendix – Translation of Opusculum 20 85 Bibliography 100 3 Introduction The current research project stems from my work in the course “Latin West, Greek East,” taught by Fr. Brian Dunkle, S.J., at the Boston College School of Theology and Ministry in the fall semester of 2016. For that course, I translated a letter of Saint Maximus the Confessor (580- 662) that is found among his works known collectively as the Opuscula theologica et polemica.1 My immediate interest in the text was Maximus’s treatment of the twin heresies of monoenergism and monotheletism. As I made progress
    [Show full text]
  • Maximus the Confessor and a Deeper Actualization of the Apostolic Dimensions of Pentecostal Movements
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Faculty Publications - Portland Seminary Portland Seminary 2014 Maximus the Confessor and a Deeper Actualization of the Apostolic Dimensions of Pentecostal Movements Steve Overman Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/gfes Part of the History of Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons BLOOD CRIES OUT Pentecostals, Ecology, and the Groans of Creation EDITED BY A. J. SWOBODA �PICKWICK Publications • Eugene, Oregon 6 Maximus the Confessor and a Deeper Actualization of the Apostolic Dimensions of Pentecostal Movements Steve Overman In his now famous and controversial 1967 lecture, “The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis,” medieval historian and Presbyterian layman Lynn White, Jr. suggested that many of the unhealthy and unsustainable attitudes toward and treatment of nature found in modern times were to a great extent made possible by the dogmas of especially medieval and modern western Christianity. In contrast to older pagan systems, which viewed humankind as one part of a much larger and animated whole, from the perspective of these dogmas human beings could be seen as separate from and superior to nature and free to objectify and exploit it for their own ends. In light of this, White challenged the churches to “rethink” how their faith might lead them to view their relationship with nature, calling them to move beyond exploitation, and even notions of “stewardship,” to a deeper mutuality he termed “a spiritual democracy of all God’s crea- tures.” As possible alternative Christian resources for this reform, White 98 maximus the confessor 99 called attention especially to St.
    [Show full text]
  • Holy Fathers 7Th Council
    October 14, 2012 Sunday Sermon Fr Ambrose Young Entrance of the Theotokos into the Temple Skete The Holy Fathers of the 7th Council Titus 3:8-15 Luke 8:5-15 In the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Amen. On this Sunday the Church celebrates the Holy Fathers of the Seventh Ecumenical Council and asks us to reflect upon that Council and also the whole concept we Orthodox have of what we constantly refer to as “the Holy Fathers”. This Council of the Church—the last general universal Council of Holy Orthodoxy--was held in the year 787 and dealt with the whole controversy surrounding the use of sacred images or icons. This is an important Council for us to know about because in the West, at the time of the Protestant Reformation, images in churches were severely criticized and in many cases destroyed and forbidden. To this day most Protestant churches are very bereft and bare of sacred imagery other than the Cross, and some do not even have a Cross. Mormons even see the Cross as an emblem of shame and do not make use of it in their churches and temples, nor do they wear a cross. Even some very modern Catholic Churches—perhaps in order not to offend Protestants?—have gone in the direction of stripping themselves of sacred art of all kinds. But in Orthodoxy we continue to preserve and cherish our rich tradition of iconography and other forms of sacred art, seeing these as both theologically and spiritually necessary and also an essential component of ancient Christian civilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Franciscan Doctrine of Christ
    Theological Studies 64 (2003) REVISITING THE FRANCISCAN DOCTRINE OF CHRIST ILIA DELIO, O.S.F. [Franciscan theologians posit an integral relation between Incarna- tion and Creation whereby the Incarnation is grounded in the Trin- ity of love. The primacy of Christ as the fundamental reason for the Incarnation underscores a theocentric understanding of Incarnation that widens the meaning of salvation and places it in a cosmic con- tent. The author explores the primacy of Christ both in its historical context and with a contemporary view toward ecology, world reli- gions, and extraterrestrial life, emphasizing the fullness of the mys- tery of Christ.] ARL RAHNER, in his remarkable essay “Christology within an Evolu- K tionary View of the World,” noted that the Scotistic doctrine of Christ has never been objected to by the Church’s magisterium,1 although one might add, it has never been embraced by the Church either. Accord- ing to this doctrine, the basic motive for the Incarnation was, in Rahner’s words, “not the blotting-out of sin but was already the goal of divine freedom even apart from any divine fore-knowledge of freely incurred guilt.”2 Although the doctrine came to full fruition in the writings of the late 13th-century philosopher/theologian John Duns Scotus, the origins of the doctrine in the West can be traced back at least to the 12th century and to the writings of Rupert of Deutz. THE PRIMACY OF CHRIST TRADITION The reason for the Incarnation occupied the minds of medieval thinkers, especially with the rise of Anselm of Canterbury and his satisfaction theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Palamas and Bonaventure on the Experience of God— a Contribution to Orthodox-Roman Catholic Dialogue
    Journal of Ecumenical Studies 44 3, Summer 2009 MIRROR OF EXPERIENCE: PALAMAS AND BONAVENTURE ON THE EXPERIENCE OF GOD— A CONTRIBUTION TO ORTHODOX-ROMAN CATHOLIC DIALOGUE Rüssel Murray PRECIS In this essay, the author places into a "dialogue of love" the mystical theologies of Saints Gregory Palamas and Bonaventure of Bagnoregio, as developed in their respective masterpieces, the Defense of the Holy Hesychasts and The Soul's Journey into God. It is the author's contention that when this dialogue is engendered, one is able to see how these saints, precisely within the diversity of their respective ecclesial traditions, mirror each other's understanding of how the human person experiences God and, in the process, mirror how Orthodox and Roman Catholic faithful alike can both perceive anew and visibly witness once again to the faith, hope, and love that even now unites them as one body in Christ. / Introduction In his apostolic letter Orientale Lumen, Pope John Paul II noted, with regard to the enduring schism between the Orthodox and Roman Catholic Churches, "We have increasingly learned that it was not so much an historical episode or a mere question of preeminence that tore the fabric of unity, as it was a progres­ sive estrangement, so that the other's diversity was no longer perceived as a Rüssel Murray, OFM (Roman Catholic), is an Assistant Professor in the Dept of Systematic The­ ology at Washington (DC) Theological Union, where he has taught since 2007 He previously served on the staff of St Anthony Shrine in Boston, 1998-2000 He
    [Show full text]
  • Maximus the Confessor and John of Damascus on Gnomic Will (Γνώμη) in Christ: Clarity and Ambiguity Paul M
    44 Maximus the Confessor and John of Damascus on Gnomic Will (γνώμη) in Christ: Clarity and Ambiguity Paul M. Blowers Emmanuel Christian Seminary Johnson City, Tennessee For years I have been perplexed as to why Maximus the Confessor, in his articulate christological formulations in the seventh century, ultimately decided that Jesus Christ, as fully human, had only a natural human will (θέλημα φυσική), and so forcefully ruled against the possibility that he also had a “gnomic” (or “deliberative”) will (γνώμη) in the manner of fallen human beings. In the words of Maximus’ own beloved predecessor, Gregory Nazianzen, “what is not assumed is not healed.”1 Tough not alone in this concern, I’ve made a regular pest of myself broaching this issue in numerous patristics conferences (most recently the 2011 Oxford Patristics Conference) anytime an essay on Maximus would even remotely touch on the matter. Te answer I get represents a fairly hardened scholarly consensus. Accordingly, Maximus, in working out his understanding of the Chalcedonian defnition, still required a certain asymmetry in the composite hypostasis of Christ, since it is the divine hypostasis of the Son who united with and divinized the humanity of Jesus. In this case only a “natural” human will could be truly deifed, not a gnomic will prone to vacillation. I agree with this consensus in general, and it has been strengthened all the more in an excellent recent study by Ian McFarland comparing Maximus’ doctrine of the will with that of Augustine. McFarland has cogently argued the plausibility of Maximus’ denial of γνώμη in Christ as a function of his strong sense that “natural” human will, as modeled in Christ, is not antecedently “constrained” by the will of the divine Creator but a manifestation of the gracious stability of human will in concert with deifying divine grace.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturally and by Grace: Maximus the Confessor on the Operation of the Will
    C SJT 58(4): 410–433 (2005) Printed in the United Kingdom ⃝ 2005 Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd doi:10.1017/S0036930605001481 ‘Naturally and by grace’: Maximus the Confessor on the operation of the will Ian A. McFarland Candler School of Theology, 109B, Bishops Hall, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA [email protected] Abstract Although Maximus’ and Augustine’s theologies of the will were shaped by very different polemical contexts, it is arguable that the two thinkers were interested in securing the same theological ground. In response to positions that treated the will as a reserve of human autonomy over against God, both thinkers sought to see the freedom of the will as a function of its integration into the natural order through grace. Maximus’ concept of the natural will in particular functions as a means of challenging both divine determinism and human libertarianism as adequate accounts of the relationship between divine and human activity. In one of his early works, Maximus the Confessor offers a brief but im- passioned account of the final destiny of human beings: With the advent of Christ at the end of time, there will be a change and transformation of inclination and choice in human beings from faithlessness to faith, from wickedness to virtue, from ignorance to knowledge of God; because then, at the end of the ages, there will be through the same God, our Savior, a transformation and renewal of the whole human race that is all-encompassing, natural, and by grace, from death and corruption to immortal life and incorruption in the expected resurrection.1 Though Maximus quickly moves on to other matters in this treatise, much of his subsequent literary output can be read as an attempt to flesh out the meaning of this seemingly bizarre conflation of intentional, natural and divine activity in human life.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Maximus the Confessor Library ALPHABETICAL LIST
    St. Maximus the Confessor Library ALPHABETICAL LIST NOTE: Biography section at the end of this list 248.4 Agapios, The Monk. The Divine Flame: Elder Porphyrios Lit in My Heart. .A32 Holy Convent of the Transfiguration of the Savior, Athens, 2005. 281.9 Alfeyev, Bp. Hilarion. The Mystery of Faith: An Introduction to the Teaching .A44 and Spirituality of the Orthodox Church. Ed. Jessica Rose. London: Darton Longman & Todd Ltd., 2002. 253.5 Allen, Joseph J. Inner Way: Toward a Rebirth of Eastern Spiritual Direction. .A45 Eerdmans, 1994. 253.22 ________, ed. Vested in Grace: Priesthood and Marriage in the Christian East. .A45 Holy Cross Orthodox Press, 2001. 270 Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture. Old Testament 1. Genesis 1-11. .A53 IVP, 2001 ot 1 270 Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture. New Testament 1a. Matthew 1- .A53 13. IVP, 2001. nt 1a 270 The Ante-Nicene Fathers. Vol. 8. Wm. B. Eerdmans Pub., 1995. .A58 vol. 8 264 Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America. Orthodox .A58 Missal. Stanton, NJ: Saint Luke’s Priory Press, 1995. 281.9 Argenti, Fr. Cyrille. Fear Not : A Spiritual Journey of Faith and Freedom. .A74 Trans. Brother Antony (Stunt). Montreal, QC : Alexander Press, 2006. 230 Arseniev, Nicholas. Revelation of Life Eternal: An Introduction to the .A77 Christian Message. SVS Press, 1982. 281.947 ________. Russian Piety. SVS Press, 1964; 2nd ed., 1975. .A77 266 Aslanidis, Demetrios and Monk Damascene Grigoriatis. Apostle to Zaire : The .A85 Life and Legacy of Blessed Father Cosmas of Grigoriou. Thessalonica and London : Uncut Mountain Press, 2001. 232.1 St.
    [Show full text]