DOCSLIB.ORG

The Fourteenth Annual Report of the Ombudsman

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize2014 THE FOURTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE OMBUDSMAN Page | 0 “Truly a Haven of Democracy” 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize Prepared for laying before the House of Representatives and the Senate of Belize pursuant to Section 28(2) and (3) of the Ombudsman Act, Chapter 5 of the Substantive Laws of Belize (Rev. Ed. 2000) Page | 1 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. Presentation to the National Assembly .......................................................... 3 Ombudsman’s Message ..................................................................................... 5 Summary of 2014 Complaints ......................................................................... 7 Special Report ................................................................................................... 16 Resolution of Complaints ................................................................................ 19 Freedom of Information Applications........................................................... 21 Institutional Collaboration............................................................................... 23 Trainings and Conferences .............................................................................. 26 Administrative Matters ..................................................................................... 31 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 34 Appendices ........................................................................................................ 37 1. Statistics ......................................................................................... 39 2. How to Make a Complaint.............................................................. 46 3: The Investigative Process ................................................................... 47 4: The Ombudsman Act, Key Provisions ............................................. 48 Page | 2 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize Ref: 001/AROMB/2014 The Office of the Ombudsman 91 Freetown Road, Second Floor P.O. Box 1376 Belize City, Belize Central America Tel: 501-223-3594 / 501-223-3198 Fax: 501-223-33198 Email: [email protected] 18th February, 2015 Hon. Marco Pech President of the Senate National Assembly Belmopan Dear Mr. President, I have the honour to present the Ombudsman’s Fourteenth Annual Report which covers the period of January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. The report is submitted in accordance with Section 28(2) of the Ombudsman Act, Chapter 5 of the Substantive Laws of Belize, which states: - “The Ombudsman shall submit to the National Assembly an annual report relating generally to the execution of his functions.” Respectfully, ___________________ Lionel Arzu, MSc. Ombudsman of Belize Page | 3 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize Ref: 001/AROMB/2014 The Office of the Ombudsman 91 Freetown Road, Second Floor P.O. Box 1376 Belize City, Belize Central America Tel: 501-223-3594 / 501-223-3198 Fax: 501-223-33198 Email: [email protected] 18th February, 2015 Hon. Mike Peyreffite Speaker of the House of Representatives The National Assembly Belmopan Dear Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present the Ombudsman’s Fourteenth Annual Report which covers the period of January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. The report is submitted in accordance with Section 28(2) of the Ombudsman Act, Chapter 5 of the Substantive Laws of Belize, which states: - “The Ombudsman shall submit to the National Assembly an annual report relating generally to the execution of his functions.” Respectfully, _____________________ Lionel Arzu, MSc. Ombudsman of Belize Page | 4 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize OMBUDSMAN’S MESSAGE Once again, it is my pleasure to present to the National Assembly the Fourteenth Annual Report on the execution of my functions for the past year. My functions are essentially two-fold. My primary function is to investigate complaints of alleged wrongdoings by public authorities pursuant to the Ombudsman Act, Chapter 5, Substantive Laws of Belize (Rev. Ed. 2000). My secondary function is to review decisions of public authorities denying access to information requested pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, Chapter 13, Substantive Laws of Belize (Rev. Ed. 2000). This report provides a concise summary of the events that unfolded in 2014 in the exercise of these two functions. The Fourteenth Annual Report contains a statistical summary of the two hundred and twenty (220) new complaints received during the course of the year. This summary is grouped according to: authorities complained against; geographical origins of complaints; subject matter of complaints; and, the status of these complaints. Although it is my second year in Office, it is quite clear that the trend is consistent with previous years, in terms of both the number and nature of the complaints. This report also summarizes applications under the Freedom of Information Act. For the first time in the recorded history of our office, three applications for review were made under this Act. Although the applications were either denied or did not progress far, the fact of the applications being made quite possible signals a movement towards making public authorities more accountable, transparent and fair to all citizens when carrying out their administrative functions. The year 2014 was one of increased collaboration among our colleagues and even with the very authorities complained against. Collaboration was in the area of complaints resolution; prison reform; criminal justice reform; and, strengthening Government’s accountability in combating gender based violence. It was also a year in which I seized the opportunities to promote to foreign and local dignitaries the agenda for my term in office. I believe that the fulfilment of this agenda will enable my office to better carry out its mandate. In 2014, my staff and I participated in training events, either as facilitators or as participants. Topics were very important and current, and included subjects such as the law and health care; case management and negotiation; mediation; and anti- trafficking in persons. This report provides a summary of these training events and conferences. Page | 5 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize The year 2014 also saw some changes to our office. We welcomed a new Legal Officer, as the outgoing one preferred to pursue a career in private practice. I take this opportunity to thank Attorney-at-law Oscar Selgado for his service to the Office of the Ombudsman and wish him well in his new endeavour. The Ministry of Finance approved the employment of a Security Officer to provide personal protection to my staff and me. My Office welcomed Miss Kimberlyn Marin to the team as our new Office Cleaner. She replaced Miss Gilda Leslie, who retired after twelve years of service to the Office of the Ombudsman. I want to take this opportunity to thank Miss Leslie for her service and wish her all the best in her retirement. Despite these welcomed changes, fundamentally, my office continues to operate within the parameters of limited human and financial resources. Even so, the Office made significant accomplishments during the past year. Finally, I wish to thank the National Assembly, the Government of Belize and the Judiciary for this honour and responsibility of being the Ombudsman, a partner in ensuring the protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms. I also wish to thank my own staff for their hard work and dedication. This Fourteenth Annual Report is presented not only as a report pertaining to the execution of my functions but also as a summary of the public opinion on current administrative practices. Furthermore, it is hoped that this report will help to promote (additional) reforms in public administration. I hope you enjoy reading this report and look forward to your continued support for the work of the Office of the Ombudsman and a productive and brighter 2015. Your Humble Servant I Remain, ______________________ Lionel Arzu, MSc. Ombudsman of Belize Page | 6 2014 ANNUAL REPORT The Ombudsman of Belize I. SUMMARY OF 2014 The following is a breakdown of the COMPLAINTS complaints by Authorities; Geographical Origin; Subject-Matter; 1.0 The Ombudsman’s primary and Status. function is to investigate complaints from private citizens regarding AUTHORITIES wrongdoing, abuse, injustice or injury they have suffered at the hands of 1.2 The Ombudsman is allowed to public authorities. The Ombudsman investigate authorities. The Act states: Ombudsman Act defines authorities as follows: - Subject to the provisions of this Act, where the Ombudsman has reasonable (i) A Ministry, Department, or cause to believe that: - Agency of Government; (a) An authority or an officer of member (ii) The Belize Police Department; of an authority has been guilty of corruption or other wrongdoing; or, (iii) Other statutory body or authority; or (b) Any person or body of persons has or may have sustained injustice, injury (iv) A company registered under or abuse as a result of any action the Companies Act being a taken by an authority or an officer or company in which the a member of such authority, arising Government holds not less out of or connected with the exercise than fifty-one per centum of the of the administrative functions of that ordinary shares and so declared authority (whether before or after the by the National Assembly.2 commencement of this Act), the Ombudsman
Recommended publications
  • A Study of the Garifuna of Belize's Toledo District Alexander Gough

    A Study of the Garifuna of Belize's Toledo District Alexander Gough

    Indigenous identity in a contested land: A study of the Garifuna of Belize’s Toledo district Alexander Gough This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2018 Lancaster University Law School 1 Declaration This thesis has not been submitted in support of an application for another degree at this or any other university. It is the result of my own work and includes nothing that is the outcome of work done in collaboration except where specifically indicated. Many of the ideas in this thesis were the product of discussion with my supervisors. Alexander Gough, Lancaster University 21st September 2018 2 Abstract The past fifty years has seen a significant shift in the recognition of indigenous peoples within international law. Once conceptualised as the antithesis to European identity, which in turn facilitated colonial ambitions, the recognition of indigenous identity and responding to indigenous peoples’ demands is now a well-established norm within the international legal system. Furthermore, the recognition of this identity can lead to benefits, such as a stake in controlling valuable resources. However, gaining tangible indigenous recognition remains inherently complex. A key reason for this complexity is that gaining successful recognition as being indigenous is highly dependent upon specific regional, national and local circumstances. Belize is an example of a State whose colonial and post-colonial geographies continue to collide, most notably in its southernmost Toledo district. Aside from remaining the subject of a continued territorial claim from the Republic of Guatemala, in recent years Toledo has also been the battleground for the globally renowned indigenous Maya land rights case.
  • International Narcotics Control Strategy Report

    International Narcotics Control Strategy Report

    United States Department of State Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs International Narcotics Control Strategy Report Volume I Drug and Chemical Control March 2017 INCSR 2017 Volume 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Common Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................. iii International Agreements .......................................................................................................................... v INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Policy and Program Developments ......................................................................................................... 17 Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 18 Methodology for U.S. Government Estimates of Illegal Drug Production ............................................... 24 (with dates ratified/acceded) ................................................................................................................... 30 USG Assistance ..................................................................................................................................... 36 International Training .............................................................................................................................
  • CRC in Court: the Case Law of the Convention on the Rights of the Child Acknowledgment

    CRC in Court: the Case Law of the Convention on the Rights of the Child Acknowledgment

    CRC in Court: The Case Law of the Convention on the Rights of the Child Acknowledgment CRC in Court: The Case Law of the Convention on the Rights of the Child was written by Patrick Geary for the Child Rights International Network (CRIN). CRIN welcomes comments, suggestions and feedback; contact us at: The Child Rights International Network, 2 Pontypool Place, East Studio, London SE1 8QF, United Kingdom. Tel: +44 20 7401 2257. Email: [email protected]; Web: www.crin.org. Published by Child Rights International Network (CRIN) East Studio 2 Pontypool Place London, SE1 8QF United Kingdom +44 20 7401 2257 www.crin.org First published 2012. © Child Rights International Network 2012 The Child Rights International Network is a charity registered in England and Wales (1125925). Registered Company No. 6653398. CRIN encourages personal and educational use of this publication and grants permission for its reproduction in this capacity where proper credit is given in good faith. For resale or commercial distribution in any other manner, prior permission must be obtained in writing. Table of Contents Introduction......................................................................................................4 Status of the CRC in National Legal Systems..................................................5 Analysis ...........................................................................................................8 Conclusion......................................................................................................28 Recommendations..........................................................................................30
  • 3434 Tues Feb 2, 2021 (9-12).Pmd

    3434 Tues Feb 2, 2021 (9-12).Pmd

    Tuesday, February 2, 2021 AMANDALABelize Page 1 NO. 3434 BELIZE CITY, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2021 (20 PAGES) $1.00 Narco plane busted with over 2000 pounds of cocaine Nine men has since been arrested and charged. One of the men is the driver for the BDF BDF Commander’s Commander, Brigadier General Steven Ortega. driver arrested for drug plane landing LADYVILLE, Fri. Jan. 29, 2021 One of the lawmen arrested and charged in connection to the drug plane bust which took place early Friday morning was the driver of Brigadier General Steven Ortega. During an interview with the media on Friday, the BDF’s commander BELIZE DISTRICT, Fri. Jan. 29, 2021 Mexican air asset, intercepted a narco confirmed reports of the arrest On Friday morning at around 3:30 plane that departed from South America and shared that he was a.m., the Belize Police Department, with a little before 10:00 p.m. on Thursday distraught by the news. His the help of the Joint Intelligence driver, identified as Lance Operation Center (JIOC) and a Please turn to Page 19 Corporal Steve Rowland was the only BDF soldier arrested Belmopan 16-year-old Please turn toPage 3 community charged with grocer murdered murder of Curfew extended to Kenrick Drysdale 10:00 p.m. for adults BELMOPAN, Fri. Jan. 29, 2021 Late Friday afternoon, 53-year-old DANGRIGA, Stann Creek District, Belmopan resident Abel Baldarez was Thurs. Jan. 28, 2021 BELIZE CITY, Fri. Jan. 29, 2021 however, will remain unchanged, from murdered during a robbery that took On Thursday morning, January 28, The Ministry of Health and Wellness 6:00 p.m.
  • Case of Maya Indigenous Communities of Belize, Inter-Am

    Case of Maya Indigenous Communities of Belize, Inter-Am

    REPORT Nº 96/03 CASE 12.053 MAYA INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES OF THE TOLEDO DISTRICT BELIZE October 24, 2003 I. SUMMARY 1. This report concerns a petition presented to the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights (the "Commission”) against the State of Belize (the "State" or “Belize”) on August 7, 1998 by the Indian Law Resource Center and the Toledo Maya Cultural Council (the “Petitioners”). The petition claims that the State is responsible for violating rights under the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man (the “American Declaration”) that the Mopan and Ke’kchi Maya People of the Toledo District of Southern Belize (the “Maya people of the Toledo District” or the “Maya people”) are alleged to have over certain lands and natural resources.1 2. The Petitioners claim that the State has violated Articles I, II, III, VI, XI, XVIII, XX and XXIII of the American Declaration in respect of lands traditionally used and occupied by the Maya people, by granting logging and oil concessions in and otherwise failing to adequately protect those lands, failing to recognize and secure the territorial rights of the Maya people in those lands, and failing to afford the Maya people judicial protection of their rights and interests in the lands due to delays in court proceedings instituted by them. According to the Petitioners, the State’s contraventions have impacted negatively on the natural environment upon which the Maya people depend for subsistence, have jeopardized the Maya people and their culture, and threaten to cause further damage in the future. 3. The State has indicated before the Commission that applicable law and the facts presented by the Petitioners are unclear as to whether the Maya people may have aboriginal rights in the lands under dispute, although at the same time it has recognized in negotiations outside of the Commission proceedings that the Maya people have rights in lands in the Toledo District based upon their longstanding use and occupancy of that territory.
  • Private Lands Conservation in Belize

    Private Lands Conservation in Belize

    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Books, Reports, and Studies Resources, Energy, and the Environment 2004 Private Lands Conservation in Belize Joan Marsan University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Estates and Trusts Commons, Land Use Law Commons, Legislation Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Property Law and Real Estate Commons, and the Tax Law Commons Citation Information Joan Marsan, Private Lands Conservation In Belize (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). JOAN MARSAN, PRIVATE LANDS CONSERVATION IN BELIZE (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. AVAILABLE ONLINE ====================; • •~ ~ ...... ~ ~ ~ .­~ PRIVATE LANDS CONSERVATION IN .~ BELIZE •_. -­~ • ~ ..­ A Country Report by the Natural Resources Law Center, ...... University of Colorado School of Law ~ 4 .­~ September 2004 ~ Sponsored by The Nature Conservancy Primary Author: Joan Marsan, NRLC Research Assistant KGA [email protected] 576 • M37 2004 Private Lands
  • Address of the Hon. Chief Justice, Sir Isaac Hyatali, T.C

    Address of the Hon. Chief Justice, Sir Isaac Hyatali, T.C

    ADDRESS OF THE HON. CHIEF JUSTICE, SIR ISAAC HYATALI, T.C. AT THE OPENING OF THE LAW TERM IN THE HALL OF JUSTICE, RED HOUSE, PORT- OF -SPAIN ON 3 OCTOBER, 1980 Mr. President of the Bar Association et al. We formally begin today the 19th Law Term of the Supreme Court of Trinidad and Tobago. Sittings however of the High Court and the Court of Appeal to dispose of the matters on their respective calendars will not begin until Monday 6 October 1980. FIFTEEN JUDGES For the very first time in its history the High Court then will be manned by 15 judges. Two of them are practising members of the Bar who will be giving up their respective practices for three months certain at no little sacrifice to themselves to serve the Country as Judges. They are Mr. Martin Daly of the Senior Bar and Mr. Trevor Lee of the Junior Bar. MR. JAMES DAVIS Mr. James Davis, a practising member of the Bar, was the first to make such a sacrifice. He joined us in May for three months and at my special request continued for another two months but I regret exceedingly to say that I failed to persuade him to allow me to propose him to the Judicial and Legal Service Commission as an eminently qualified and suitable candidate for permanent judicial office on the High Court Bench. The unattractive salary and conditions of service of a Judge made it impossible for him to give serious consideration to my offer. It is fitting to place on record, and I do so with a sense of gratitude and pleasure that he discharged his judicial duties with ability, dignity and efficiency, and that he did so in response to my appeal to fit and proper and respected members of the Bar to come forward and assist the Supreme Court to discharge its onerous and responsible functions with greater speed and efficiency.
  • Orozco V AG(Belize)

    Orozco V AG(Belize)

    Human Dignity Trust Belize scraps law targeting gay men 10 August 2016 Small Caribbean state sheds colonial legacy law FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 10 August 2016 Orozco v Attorney General of Belize (Belize High Court 10 August 2016) Summary: Criminalisation of homosexuality declared unconstitutional. By a judgment handed down on 10 August 2016 the Chief Justice of Belize held that provisions in the Belize Criminal Code purporting to criminalise private consensual sexual conduct between adults of the same sex breached the Constitution of Belize and so should be declared void. In doing so the Chief Justice upheld the claim brought by the Belizean activist Caleb Orozco against the Government of Belize. The Chief Justice held that laws purporting to criminalise private homosexual conduct breached the rights to dignity, privacy, equality and non-discrimination enshrined in the Belize Constitution and so were void. Mr Orozco’s arguments were supported by the Commonwealth Lawyers Association, The Human Dignity Trust and the International Commission of Jurists (the Interveners). The decision of the Chief Justice represented the first occasion on which any Caribbean Court had determined such a constitutional challenge. Press Release: A law in Belize that disproportionately affects gay men was today ruled unconstitutional by the country’s Supreme Court after a three-year wait for the judgment. Section 53 of Belize’s Criminal Code, an old British colonial law, banned ‘carnal intercourse against the order of nature’ and thereby made consensual gay sex between adult men in private illegal in Belize. Today the legal provision has been ruled ‘unlawful’ to the extent that it can be applied to same-sex activity.
  • MAYA LEADERS ALLIANCE (MLA) Belize

    MAYA LEADERS ALLIANCE (MLA) Belize

    Empowered lives. Resilient nations. MAYA LEADERS ALLIANCE (MLA) Belize Equator Initiative Case Studies Local sustainable development solutions for people, nature, and resilient communities UNDP EQUATOR INITIATIVE CASE STUDY SERIES Local and indigenous communities across the world are 126 countries, the winners were recognized for their advancing innovative sustainable development solutions achievements at a prize ceremony held in conjunction that work for people and for nature. Few publications with the United Nations Convention on Climate Change or case studies tell the full story of how such initiatives (COP21) in Paris. Special emphasis was placed on the evolve, the breadth of their impacts, or how they change protection, restoration, and sustainable management over time. Fewer still have undertaken to tell these stories of forests; securing and protecting rights to communal with community practitioners themselves guiding the lands, territories, and natural resources; community- narrative. The Equator Initiative aims to fill that gap. based adaptation to climate change; and activism for The Equator Initiative, supported by generous funding environmental justice. The following case study is one in from the Government of Norway, awarded the Equator a growing series that describes vetted and peer-reviewed Prize 2015 to 21 outstanding local community and best practices intended to inspire the policy dialogue indigenous peoples initiatives to reduce poverty, protect needed to take local success to scale, to improve the global nature, and strengthen resilience in the face of climate knowledge base on local environment and development change. Selected from 1,461 nominations from across solutions, and to serve as models for replication. PROJECT SUMMARY KEY FACTS Maya Leaders Alliance (MLA) is a coalition of Maya Equator Prize Winner organizations and leaders collectively working to 2015 promote the long-term well-being of the Maya people through defending their collective rights to Founded their territories.
  • BELIZE TELECOM LIMITED Et Al V ATTORNEY GENERAL of BELIZE

    BELIZE TELECOM LIMITED Et Al V ATTORNEY GENERAL of BELIZE

    1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2007 CLAIM NO. 292 OF 2007 (BELIZE TELECOM LIMITED 1 ST Claimant (JEFFREY PROSSER 2 ND Claimant (BOBBY LUBANA 3 RD Claimant (PUBLIC SERVICE UNION 4 TH Claimant (BELIZE NATIONAL TEACHERS UNION 5 TH Claimant ( (AND ( (THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF BELIZE Defendant (AND (BELIZE TELEMEDIA LIMITED Interest Party Coram: Hon. Justice Sir John Muria 7 th December 2007 Mrs. Lois Young S.C. for Claimants Mr. Edwin Flowers S.C. for the Defendant Mr. Eamon Courtenay S.C. for the Interested Party JUDGMENT JUDICIAL REVIEW – Claim under Part 56, Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) – claim in public law – alleged violations of constitutionally protected rights – challenge to constitutional validity of Vesting Act 2007 – application to strike out claim – legal standing or locus standi – test under Part II, Constitution and test of “sufficient interest” – whether issues before the Court academic or moot or of no practical benefits – whether live controversy between parties – whether commercial law claim dressed up in constitutional challenge – new Civil Procedure Rules embrace modern development on legal standing – test of “real prospect of success” 2 applicable at leave stage in judicial review – legitimate expectation to be heard – basis for claim unchanged – summary judgment not applicable in constitutional claim for redress – Rule 15.3, CPR – validity of the Vesting Act a live controversy between the parties Muria J.: By their applications issued and filed in this court, Belize Telemedia Limited (Interested Party) and the Attorney General of Belize (Defendant) respectively, on 7 th and 12 th September 2007, seek orders striking out and dismissing the Claimants’ claim pursuant to Rule 26.1(2) (j) and 26.3(1)(b) and (c) of the Supreme Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2005 (CPR).
  • Mandating Recognition International Law and Native/ Aboriginal Title

    Mandating Recognition International Law and Native/ Aboriginal Title

    Mandating Recognition International Law and Native/ Aboriginal Title Owen J. Lynch ABOUT THE AUTHOR Owen J. Lynch is currently a professorial lecturer at the University of the Philippines College of Law and a RRI Fellow. Previously he has worked as a senior attorney and managing director of the Law and Communities and Human Rights and Environment programs at the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) in Washington, DC, (1997-2006) and as a Senior Associate at the World Resources Institute (1990-96). His substantive focus is on environmental justice, law and sustainable development, and his special expertise is on community-based property rights (CBPRs) and their legal recognition in national and international law. THE RIGHTS AND RESOURCES INITIATIVE The Rights and Resources Initiative (RRI) is a strategic coalition comprised of international, regional, and community organizations engaged in development, research and conservation to advance forest tenure, policy and market re- forms globally. The mission of the Rights and Resources Initiative is to support local communities’ and indigenous peoples’ struggles against poverty and marginalization by promoting greater global commitment and action towards policy, market and legal reforms that secure their rights to own, control, and benefit from natural resources, especially land and forests. RRI is coordinated by the Rights and Resources Group, a non-profit organization based in Washington, D.C. For more information, please visit www.rightsandresources.org. PARTNERS ACICAFOC SUPPORTERS Rights and Resources Initiative Washington DC Mandating Recognition © 2011 Rights and Resources Initiative. Reproduction permitted with attribution ISBN :978-0-9833674-1-3 The views presented here are those of the authors and are not necessarily shared by coalition Partners nor by DFID, Ford Foundation, Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, Norad, SDC and Sida, who have generously supported this work.
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of BELIZE, A.D. 2007 Claim No. 171 Of

    IN the SUPREME COURT of BELIZE, A.D. 2007 Claim No. 171 Of

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2007 Claim No. 171 of 2007 BETWEEN AURELIO CAL in his own behalf and on behalf of the Maya VILLAGE OF SANTA CRUZ and BASILIO TEUL, HIGINIO TEUL, MARCELINA CAL TEUL, and SUSANO CANTI Claimants and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF BELIZE and THE MINISTER OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE ENVIRONMENT Defendants Claim No. 172 of 2007 BETWEEN MANUEL COY, in his own behalf and on behalf of the Maya VILLAGE OF CONEJO and MANUEL CAAL, PERFECTO MAKIN AND MELINA MAKIN Claimants and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF BELIZE and THE MINISTER OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE ENVIRONMENT Defendants SKELETON ARGUMENT OF THE CLAIMANTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ISSUES PRESENTED AS AGREED UPON BY THE PARTIES ............................................................ 3 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 3 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT........................................................................................................... 3 ARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................. 4 ISSUE I: Maya customary land tenure exists in southern Belize, as confirmed by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights .................................................................... 5 ISSUE II: The Members of Conejo and Santa Cruz villages have interests in lands based on Maya customary land tenure, and the nature of those interests is in accordance with the customary patterns