Response to Motion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Response to Motion Electronically RECEIVED on June 07, 2021 Electronically FILED on June 07, 2021 Appellate Court Clerk Appellate Court Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) Movant, ) KNOX COUNTY v. ) No. M2020-01156-SC-DPE-DD ) CAPITAL CASE CHRISTA GAIL PIKE, ) ) Trial Court No. 58183A Defendant. ) DEFENDANT CHRISTA PIKE’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE STATE’S MOTION TO SET EXECUTION DATE AND REQUEST FOR A CERTIFICATE OF COMMUTATION Christa Gail Pike opposes the State’s motion to set an execution date and asks this Court for a Certificate of Commutation. Extenuating circumstances exist because Christa Pike was only eighteen at the time of this offense and suffering from severe mental illness along with organic brain damage. Her youth, her sexual victimization and traumatic upbringing, as well as her severe mental illness justify a commutation of the death sentence by this Court. Alternatively, Ms. Pike requests this Court deny the State’s motion because that motion is premature. Setting an execution date is premature because the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) has reviewed Ms. Pike’s Petition requesting issuance of precautionary measures, determined that she is at serious and urgent risk of irreparable harm, and requested that the United 1 States refrain from carrying out the death penalty on Christa Pike until the IACHR can complete its investigation. Furthermore, setting an execution date at this time is also premature because TDOC safety measures in response to the COVID pandemic have precluded completing a current mental health evaluation. The State has just begun reopening and prisons have only recently begun allowing experts to conduct in-person evaluations. This Court should delay any ruling on the State’s motion until Ms. Pike has had the opportunity to fully research and investigate potential arguments for commutation that were stymied by the pandemic. Christa Gail Pike was a teenaged girl when the State of Tennessee sentenced her to death.1 If the Attorney General’s motion is granted, she will be the first woman Tennessee executes in over 200 years.2 She would also be the first person Tennessee has executed in the modern era who 1 There have been only 17 women executed by States or the federal government in the post-Furman era. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/death- row/women/executions-of-women. None were teenagers at the time of their offense; all were over the age of 21. See Exhibit 1 (Women Executed Post-Furman). 2 See https://www.acrosswalls.org/datasets/executions-us/ (database drawn primarily from Espy reflecting only four executions of women: 1) March 20, 1807, hanging of Molly Holcomb, a Black female; 2) 1808 hanging of an unnamed Black female; 3) 1819 hanging of an unnamed Black female, and 4) 1820 hanging of Eve Martin, race unknown for accessory to murder. However, the Espy database appears to have incorrectly included Eve Martin, who was the victim of a homicide, not an accessory. See David V. Baker, Women and Capital Punishment in the United States: An Analytical History, 132 (McFarland, 2015). 2 was a teenager at the time of the offense.3 Such death sentences for youthful offenders have now become exceedingly rare in this country in the years since her conviction and this Court’s last review of her sentence in 1998.4 Facts of the Case and Procedural History In January 1995, eighteen-year-old Christa Pike, seventeen-year- old Tadaryl Shipp, and nineteen-year-old Shadolla Peterson were charged in the Criminal Court for Knoxville County, Tennessee with the murder of nineteen-year-old Colleen Slemmer. (T XXIII: 2202.) All four teenagers were participating in Job Corps, a federal jobs training program for troubled adolescents. The three defendants invited Slemmer with them to a secluded area, where they killed her. Her throat was cut 3 Prior to resuming executions post-Furman, Tennessee’s last execution was in 1960. Tennessee executed thirteen men between 2000 and 2020, all of whom were in their 20’s or 30’s when committing their offenses. See Exhibit 2 (Tennessee Executions Post-Furman). 4 In 1996, when Christa Pike was tried, execution of those 16 years or older at the time of the offense was permitted. Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989). Since her sentencing and this Court’s last review of her case, standards of decency have evolved. C.f. Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005). Notably, in this Court’s proportionality review of Ms. Pike’s sentence, the Court compared her case to eight others, and six of those defendants are no longer subject to execution. State v. Pike, 978 S.W.2d 904, 920–24 (Tenn. 1998). The seventh, Oscar Franklin Smith, awaits execution having been convicted of killing three people—his wife, and her 13 and 16-year-old sons. The eighth, Mr. Hall, was executed in 2019 after abandoning federal habeas proceedings. The 1998 Court was unaware of Ms. Pike’s severe mental illness (posttraumatic stress disorder and bipolar disorder), congenital brain damage, childhood sexual victimization and rape, abandonment, and neglect because this evidence was never presented at trial. 3 multiple times, her head was struck with a large piece of asphalt, and a pentagram was carved into her chest. (T XVII: 1691–95; T XVIII: 1744– 47, 1777.) Christa confessed to her role in this crime. (T Exs. 28, 29). Even though the crime was highly sensationalized in the Knoxville media market,5 Christa went on trial in Knox County just over a year after she was charged. William Talman6 and Julie Martin Rice were appointed to represent her although neither had tried a death penalty case. Mr. Talman acknowledged that the most important part of Christa’s trial was the penalty phase,7 yet his presentation to persuade the jury to spare Christa’s life lasted only a couple of hours and the totality of the 5 See, e.g., T III: 334 (January 20, 1995 Knoxville News-Sentinel headlined “Alleged killers held ‘soul captive’”) describing “police sources” claiming that Ms. Pike and her codefendants took a skull fragment “to trap the victim’s soul in her body. .” The article refers to Satanist beliefs and devil worship, which were not motives in the offense, but nonetheless colored the media coverage and the prosecution’s presentation at trial. 6 At the time of his appointment, Talman was facing legal difficulties of his own. As the presiding judge later acknowledged, “we all knew Talman had his own problems.” (Supp. PC II: 114.) Around that time, Talman was under investigation by several law enforcement agencies for overbilling the state’s Indigent Defense Fund—a Class B felony. (See Apr. 2008 Ex. 1: Letter dated Dec. 8, 1994; Comptroller Report (CR): May 31, 1995 Letter.) The investigation, which attracted widespread local news coverage, revealed that Talman repeatedly billed over 24 hours per day and apparently manipulated time entries to avoid detection. (CR: 9; see Apr. 2008 Ex. 1: Collection of Knoxville News Sentinel articles.) Talman eventually pleaded guilty to two ethics charges, and the Tennessee Supreme Court imposed an approximately one-year suspended revocation of Talman’s license. (Feb. 2006 Ex. 2-A: Order of Enforcement.) 7 PC XX: 324. 4 defense testimony takes up less than sixty pages of transcript. As explained below, trial counsel failed to uncover compelling mitigating evidence that was never presented to the sentencing jury or considered by this Court. Trial counsel’s sentencing phase closing argument was also brief. Counsel did not tell the jury that Christa’s youth was a statutory mitigating factor, or that the jury might spare her life based on her lack of significant criminal record. Rather, counsel emphasized the prosecution argument that Christa enjoyed the attention this case brought.8 The defense proposed a life sentence as a more severe punishment, reasoning to the jury that Christa would receive less attention than if the jury imposed death. (T XXV: 2481.) Counsel was inexplicably arguing that the jury should inflict the harshest punishment. The jury responded by imposing the harshest punishment under the law and sentenced Christa to death.9 Had she been slightly younger at the time of the crime, like her codefendant Shipp, Christa Pike would have been ineligible for the death penalty. This Court affirmed her convictions and sentences on appeal. State v. Pike, 978 S.W.2d 904 (Tenn. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1147 (1999). 8 This argument was based on the defense assessment that Christa had Borderline Personality Disorder, a diagnosis reached after cursory testing and without any analysis of her traumatic childhood. Post- conviction experts and now, Dr. Bethany Brand, have raised serious questions about the validity of this diagnosis. 9 See https://www.wbir.com/video/news/local/march-30-1996-christa- pike-is-sentenced-to-death/51-bc611a44-2e79-4084-96a6-f1f11c9f9fc4 (50 second video from Knoxville television station reporting the verdict). 5 Next, she was denied post-conviction10 and federal habeas relief. Pike v. State, No. E2009–00016–CCA–R3–PD, 2011 WL 1544207 (Tenn. Crim. App. Apr. 25, 2011), perm. appeal denied (Nov.15, 2011). Pike v. Gross, 936 F.3d 372, 382–86 (6th Cir. 2019) (Stranch, J., concurring). While the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of habeas relief, Judge Stranch wrote a concurrence wherein she expressed the view that because Christa was 18 years old at the time of the crime the death sentence “likely” violates the Eighth Amendment under the Supreme Court’s “precedent focusing on the lesser blameworthiness and greater prospect for reform that is characteristic of youth.” Id. at 384 (citing Roper v.
Recommended publications
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Summer 2017 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. Consultant to the Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Summer 2017 (As of July 1, 2017) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2,817 Race of Defendant: White 1,196 (42.46%) Black 1,168 (41.46%) Latino/Latina 373 (13.24%) Native American 26 (0.92%) Asian 53 (1.88%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.04%) Gender: Male 2,764 (98.12%) Female 53 (1.88%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 33 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 20 Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico [see note below], New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: New Mexico repealed the death penalty prospectively. The men already sentenced remain under sentence of death.] Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Spring 2017 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases to Be Decided in October Term 2016 or 2017 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS First Amendment Packingham v. North Carolina, No. 15-1194 (Use of websites by sex offender) (decision below 777 S.E.2d 738 (N.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Television Academy Awards
    2021 Primetime Emmy® Awards Ballot Outstanding Music Composition For A Series (Original Dramatic Score) The Alienist: Angel Of Darkness Belly Of The Beast After the horrific murder of a Lying-In Hospital employee, the team are now hot on the heels of the murderer. Sara enlists the help of Joanna to tail their prime suspect. Sara, Kreizler and Moore try and put the pieces together. Bobby Krlic, Composer All Creatures Great And Small (MASTERPIECE) Episode 1 James Herriot interviews for a job with harried Yorkshire veterinarian Siegfried Farnon. His first day is full of surprises. Alexandra Harwood, Composer American Dad! 300 It’s the 300th episode of American Dad! The Smiths reminisce about the funniest thing that has ever happened to them in order to complete the application for a TV gameshow. Walter Murphy, Composer American Dad! The Last Ride Of The Dodge City Rambler The Smiths take the Dodge City Rambler train to visit Francine’s Aunt Karen in Dodge City, Kansas. Joel McNeely, Composer American Gods Conscience Of The King Despite his past following him to Lakeside, Shadow makes himself at home and builds relationships with the town’s residents. Laura and Salim continue to hunt for Wednesday, who attempts one final gambit to win over Demeter. Andrew Lockington, Composer Archer Best Friends Archer is head over heels for his new valet, Aleister. Will Archer do Aleister’s recommended rehabilitation exercises or just eat himself to death? JG Thirwell, Composer Away Go As the mission launches, Emma finds her mettle as commander tested by an onboard accident, a divided crew and a family emergency back on Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES of AMERICA the Execution of Mentally Ill Offenders
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The execution of mentally ill offenders I cannot believe that capital punishment is a solution – to abolish murder by murdering, an endless chain of murdering. When I heard that my daughter’s murderer was not to be executed, my first reaction was immense relief from an additional torment: the usual catastrophe, breeding more catastrophe, was to be stopped – it might be possible to turn the bad into good. I felt with this man, the victim of a terrible sickness, of a demon over which he had no control, might even help to establish the reasons that caused his insanity and to find a cure for it... Mother of 19-year-old murder victim, California, November 1960(1) Today, at 6pm, the State of Florida is scheduled to kill my brother, Thomas Provenzano, despite clear evidence that he is mentally ill.... I have to wonder: Where is the justice in killing a sick human being? Sister of death row inmate, June 2000(2) I’ve got one thing to say, get your Warden off this gurney and shut up. I am from the island of Barbados. I am the Warden of this unit. People are seeing you do this. Final statement of Monty Delk, mentally ill man executed in Texas on 28 February 2002 Overview: A gap in the ‘evolving standards of decency’ The underlying rationale for prohibiting executions of the mentally retarded is just as compelling for prohibiting executions of the seriously mentally ill, namely evolving standards of decency. Indiana Supreme Court Justice, September 2002(3) On 30 May 2002, a jury in Maryland sentenced Francis Zito to death.
    [Show full text]
  • Omnes Vulnerant, Postuma Necat; All the Hours Wound, the Last One Kills: the Lengthy Stay on Death Row in America
    Missouri Law Review Volume 80 Issue 3 Summer 2015 Article 13 Summer 2015 Omnes Vulnerant, Postuma Necat; All the Hours Wound, the Last One Kills: The Lengthy Stay on Death Row in America Mary Elizabeth Tongue Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Mary Elizabeth Tongue, Omnes Vulnerant, Postuma Necat; All the Hours Wound, the Last One Kills: The Lengthy Stay on Death Row in America, 80 MO. L. REV. (2015) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol80/iss3/13 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Tongue: Omnes Vulnerant, Postuma Necat; LAW SUMMARY Omnes Vulnerant, Postuma Necat; All the Hours Wound, the Last One Kills: The Lengthy Stay on Death Row in America MEGAN ELIZABETH TONGUE* I. INTRODUCTION The Bureau of Justice Statistics has compiled statistical analyses show- ing that the average amount of time an inmate spends on death row has stead- ily increased over the past thirty years.1 In fact, the shortest average amount of time an inmate spent on death row during that time period was seventy-one months in 1985, or roughly six years, with the longest amount of time being 198 months, or sixteen and one half years, in 2012.2 This means that
    [Show full text]
  • May 2018 Newsletter
    May 15, 2018 Creators of Film and Television Music NEWSLETTER A n E n t e r t a i n m e n t I n d u s t r y O r g a n i z a t i on The President’s Corner Journey’s End from Charley Londoño My term as president of the California Copyright Conference (“CCC”) has been one of the most rewarding and fast-moving periods of my life. When I was elected as president, I spoke about (1) increasing membership; (2) increasing the visibility of the John Braheny Scholarship Fund; and (3) providing quality panels with interesting topics. Rarely is reality better than the dream. However, in this case, I believe, collectively as an organization, the CCC surpassed imagination. I wish space permitted me to list all of the accomplishments with specificity, but, I think the growth in membership, increased donations to the scholarship fund, and increased attendance at our panels, speaks volumes of the CCC’s accomplishments. Moreover, to add to the CCC’s accomplishments, the Apollo Awards, as well as the CCC’s Mentorship/Ambassador program, were both launched this year and have now become staples of the CCC’s initiatives. No one succeeds in this business without the help of others, and, I would like to thank the CCC’s officers, board, and members for a successful year. My heart is humbled by the amazing privilege of service as your president. Thank you for the opportunity and the journey. Best, J. Charley Londoño, Esq. President, California Copyright Conference (2017-2018) !1 Suggested Reading 10 GREAT FILM SCORES BY FEMALE COMPOSERS & Female Composers & Artists Are Gaining Ground in Television CrucialMusic & UNIVERSAL MUSIC PUBLISHING GROUP proud co-sponsors of : "Creators of Film and Television Music" Co-moderators : Jonathan David Neal — Composer and SCL Recording Secretary Jonathan David Neal is a composer and orchestrator with 25+ years’ experience in composing music for film, TV and recording projects.
    [Show full text]
  • African Human Rights Case Law Analyser
    United Nations A/HRC/36/27 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 July 2017 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty-sixth session 11-29 September 2017 Agenda items 2 and 3 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development High-level panel discussion on the question of the death penalty Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Summary The present report is submitted pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution 30/5. It provides a summary of the high-level discussion on the question of the death penalty held on 1 March 2017 at the thirty-fourth session of the Council. The objective of the panel discussion was to continue the exchange of views on the question of the death penalty and to address violations related to the use of the death penalty, in particular with respect to the prohibition of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. GE.17-11122(E) A/HRC/36/27 I. Introduction 1. Pursuant to its resolution 30/5, the Human Rights Council held its biennial high- level panel discussion on the question of the death penalty on 1 March 2017, at its thirty- fourth session. The panel was chaired by the President of the Human Rights Council, opened by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Minister of State for European Affairs of France, and moderated by Professor of Social History at the University of the West Indies Verene A.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Fall 2020 A quarterly report by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins Consultant to the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Fall 2020 (As of October 1, 2020) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2553 (2553 – 180* - 877M = 1496 enforceable sentences) Race of Defendant: White 1,076 (42.15%) Black 1,062 (41.60%) Latino/Latina 343 (13.44%) Native American 24 (0.94%) Asian 47 (1.84%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.04%) Gender: Male 2,502 (98.00%) Female 51 (2.00%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 30 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, CaliforniaM, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, OregonM, PennsylvaniaM, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. M States where a moratorium prohibiting execution has been imposed by the Governor. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 23 Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire [see note below], New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: New Hampshire repealed the death penalty prospectively. The man already sentenced remains under sentence of death.] * Designates the number of people in non-moratorium states who are not under active death sentence because of court reversal but whose sentence may be reimposed. M Designates the number of people in states where a gubernatorial moratorium on execution has been imposed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Death of Punishment: Searching for Justice Among the Worst of the Worst
    The Death of Punishment: Searching for Justice Among the Worst of the Worst By Robert Blecker, Palgrave MacMillan, N.Y., 314 pages, $28 hardcover. Jeffrey Kirchmeier , New York Law Journal May 12, 2014 When Oklahoma recently botched the lethal injection of a condemned man, death penalty opponents decried the execution as inhumane. While many death penalty advocates also criticized the procedural mistakes, some people argued that the man's horrible crime justified his agony. Throughout history, humans have debated how much suffering governments should inflict on criminals, and in his new book, "The Death of Punishment: Searching for Justice Among the Worst of the Worst," New York Law School Professor Robert Blecker explores the role of retribution in the criminal justice system. While arguing that our system should be more grounded in retributive theories, he concludes that the United States both under-punishes some crimes and over-punishes others. In "The Death of Punishment," Blecker critiques a system that focuses on housing criminals as a way of punishing and preventing crime. He reasons that society gives too little weight to retributive goals of sentencing, arguing that our anger at horrible crimes justifies more severe punishments. As an advocate for the death penalty, he asserts that egregious murderers should suffer a painful, but quick, death. He prefers the firing squad to lethal injection because the former looks like punishment, not a medical procedure. Further, he complains that prisons house people in too much comfort when prisons should be punitive institutions of suffering where inmates are constantly reminded of their victims in an unpleasant environment with tasteless food.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chair, the Needle, and the Damage Done: What the Electric Chair and the Rebirth of the Method-Of-Execution Challenge Could M
    Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy Volume 15 Article 5 Issue 1 Fall 2005 The hC air, the Needle, and the Damage Done: What the Electric Chair and the Rebirth of the Method-of-Execution Challenge Could Mean for the Future of the Eighth Amendment Timothy S. Kearns Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cjlpp Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Kearns, Timothy S. (2005) "The hC air, the Needle, and the Damage Done: What the Electric Chair and the Rebirth of the Method-of- Execution Challenge Could Mean for the Future of the Eighth Amendment," Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy: Vol. 15: Iss. 1, Article 5. Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cjlpp/vol15/iss1/5 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CHAIR, THE NEEDLE, AND THE DAMAGE DONE: WHAT THE ELECTRIC CHAIR AND THE REBIRTH OF THE METHOD-OF-EXECUTION CHALLENGE COULD MEAN FOR THE FUTURE OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT Timothy S. Kearnst INTRODUCTION ............................................. 197 I. THE ELECTROCUTION CASES ....................... 201 A. THE KEMMLER DECISION ............................ 201 B. THE KEMMLER EXECUTION ........................... 202 C. FROM IN RE KMMLER to "Evolving Standards" ..... 204 II. THE LOWER COURTS ................................ 206 A. THE CIRCUIT COURTS ................................. 206 B. THE STATE COURTS .................................. 211 C. NEBRASKA - THE LAST HOLDOUT ..................
    [Show full text]
  • The Death Penalty in the OSCE Area: Background Paper 2013
    This paper was prepared by the OSCE’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR). Every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained in this paper is accurate and impartial. This paper updates The Death Penalty in the OSCE Area: Background Paper 2013. It is intended to provide a concise update to highlight changes in the status of the death penalty in OSCE participating States since the previous publication and to promote constructive discussion of this issue. It covers the period from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014. All comments or suggestions should be addressed to ODIHR’s Human Rights Department at [email protected]. Published by the OSCE’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) Miodowa 10 00-557 Warsaw Poland www.osce.org/odihr The© OSCE/ODIHR Death 2014 Penalty inISBN the ________ OSCE Area All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for educational and other non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of ODIHR as the source. Designed by Nona Reuter Background Paper 2014 ODIHR This paper was prepared by the OSCE’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR). Every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained in this paper is accurate and impartial. This paper updates The Death Penalty in the OSCE Area: Background Paper 2013. It is intended to provide a concise update to highlight changes in the status of the death penalty in OSCE participating States since the previous publication and to promote constructive discussion of this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Prosecutor V Wan Kamil Bin Md Shafian and Others
    Public Prosecutor v Wan Kamil bin Md Shafian and Others [2001] SGHC 357 Case Number : CC 31/2001 Decision Date : 28 November 2001 Tribunal/Court : High Court Coram : MPH Rubin J Counsel Name(s) : Lawrence Ang, Toh Yung Cheong and April Phang (Deputy Public Prosecutors) for the prosecution; Ahmad Khalis (Wong Khalis & Partners) and Shah Bhavini (Bhabini & Co) (AC) (both assigned) for the first accused; Luke Lee (Luke Lee & Co) and Johan Ismail (Johan Ismail & Partners) (AC) (both assigned) for the second accused; David Rasif (David Rasif & Partners) and Sadari Musari (Sadari Musari & Partners) (AC) (both assigned) for the third acccused Parties : Public Prosecutor — Wan Kamil bin Md Shafian; Ibrahim bin Mohd; Rosli bin Ahmat Judgment GROUNDS OF DECISION 1 Wan Kamil Bin Md Shafian (‘the first accused’) born on 1 May 1967, Ibrahim Bin Mohd (‘the second accused’) born on 18 November 1965 and Rosli Bin Ahmat (‘the third accused’) born on 20 July 1970, all three from Singapore, were jointly charged and tried before me for an offence of murder. The charge against them was that on or about 8 August 2000 at about 11.45am, in furtherance of the common intention of all, they committed murder by causing the death of a 42-year-old taxi driver by name Koh Ngiap Yong, along Chestnut Avenue, Singapore, an offence punishable under s 302 read with s 34 of the Penal Code (Cap 224). 2 The prosecution evidence was that on 8 August 2000 at about 6.10am, the victim left home, first to take his daughter to school and later to drive his taxi-cab bearing registration No SHB 540C for hire.
    [Show full text]
  • A Content Analysis of Media Accounts of Death Penalty and Life Without Parole Cases Lisa R
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2017 A Content Analysis of Media Accounts of Death Penalty and Life Without Parole Cases Lisa R. Kirk East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Kirk, Lisa R., "A Content Analysis of Media Accounts of Death Penalty and Life Without Parole Cases" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3184. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3184 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Content Analysis of Media Accounts of Death Penalty and Life Without Parole Cases ____________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Criminal Justice/Criminology East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Criminal Justice & Criminology ____________________________ by Lisa Regina Kirk May 2017 ____________________________ Dr. John Whitehead, Chair Dr. Jennifer Pealer Dr. Larry Miller Keywords: Death Penalty, Life Without Parole, LWOP, Media, Newsworthy Murderers, Juvenile Murderers, Serial Killer ABSTRACT A Content Analysis of Media Accounts of Death Penalty and Life Without Parole Cases by Lisa Regina Kirk The study analyzed a convenience sample of published accounts of death penalty cases and life without parole cases. The objective of the study was to explore factors that influence the selection of cases for coverage in books, think tank reports (e.g., Heritage Foundation), and periodicals and factors related to coverage of homicides resulting in a death penalty sentence or a life without parole sentence (often termed “America’s other death penalty”).
    [Show full text]