1 Statement of Evidence of Fergus Bramley in Support of a Water
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Paul Heintzman University of Ottawa Conference Travel Funded by The
The Ecological Virtues of Bill Mason Paul Heintzman University of Ottawa Conference Travel Funded by the Reid Trust Introduction ■ Although much has been written in the last few decades about ecological virtue ethics, very little has been written on this topic from a Christian perspective (Bouma-Prediger, 2016; Blanchard & O’Brien, 2014; Melin, 2013). ■ Virtue Ethics: What type of person should I be? ■ Cultivation of certain virtues are necessary to address ecological problems (Bouma-Prediger, 2016) ■ Sometimes we see practices embodied in a person who displays what a life of virtue concretely looks like (Bouma-Prediger, 2016) ■ E.g., Mother Teresa ■ “Such people are ethical exemplars or models of virtue who inspire us to live such a life ourselves.” (Bouma-Prediger, 2016, p. 24) ■ Doesn’t give an example ■ This paper explores whether Bill Mason is an Christian exemplar of ecological virtues Bill Mason: Canoeist, Filmmaker, Artist 1929-1988 Mason Films (most National Film Board of Canada films) ■ Wilderness Treasure ■ Paddle to the Sea ■ Rise and Fall of the Great Lakes ■ Blake ■ Death of a Legend ■ Wolf Pack ■ In Search of the Bowhead Whale ■ Cry of the Wild ■ Face of the Earth ■ Path of the Paddle Series (4 films) ■ Song of the Paddle ■ Coming Back Alive ■ Pukaskwa National Park ■ Where the Buoys Are ■ The Land That Devours Ships ■ Waterwalker Ongoing Influence ■ Postage Stamp ■ 2009: Inducted posthumously into the International Whitewater Hall of Fame Writings on Mason: ■ Biography ■ Raffan (1995). Fire in the bones. ■ Canoeing ■ Raffan (1999). Being there: Bill Mason and the Canadian canoeing tradition. ■ Art ■ Buck (2005). Bill Mason: Wilderness artist from heart to hand. -
13 Spring Creek
Marlboroughtown Marshlands Rapaura Ravenscliff Spring Creek Tuamarina Waikakaho Wairau Bar Wairau Pa Marlboroughtown (1878- 1923) Spring Creek (1923-) Pre 1878 1873 4th June 1873 Marlborough Provincial Council meeting included: This morning petitions were presented by Mr Dodson in favour of a vote for. Marlboroughtown School; from 15 ratepayers, against the annexation of a portion of the County of Wairau to the Borough of Blenheim another vote of £100 for a Library and Public Room in Havelock was carried. Mr Dodson moved for a vote of £50 for the School in Marlboroughtown, but a vigorous discussion arose upon it regarding Educational finance, in which Mr Seymour announced that Government would not consent to the various items for school buildings, and upon the particular subject being put to the vote it was lost. 11th June 1873 The following petition, signed by fourteen persons, was presented .to the Provincial Council by Mr George Dodson; To his Honor the Superintendent and Provincial Council of Marlborough, in Council assembled We, the undersigned residents of Spring Creek and Marlboroughtown, do humbly beg that your Honorable Council will take into consideration this our humble petition. That we have for some years felt the necessity of establishing a school in our district, and having done so we now find a great difficulty in providing the necessary funds for its maintenance, and we do humbly pray that your Honorable Council will grant such assistance as will enable us to carry on the school successfully, as without your assistance the school must lapse, We have a Teacher engaged at a salary of Fifty (50) Pounds per annum, and since the commencement of the school the attendance has been steadily increasing showing at the present time a daily average of twenty (20) children. -
District Plan Definition of Minimum Yard Requirements
DISTRICT PLAN DEFINITION OF MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS This information sheet explains the District Plan Rules in relation to yard requirements, and how these should be measured to ensure that they comply with the City of Lower Hutt District Plan, or with an approved Resource Consent. Yard requirements should be measured from the property boundary to the closest part of the building, to include any cladding. It is therefore necessary to site the building slab and frame to ensure that cladding does not encroach upon the yard requirement. District Plan Interpretation Reason for yard rule in the City of Lower What this means is that no building, inclusive of Hutt District Plan its cladding, can be closer than 1.0 metre from The reason quoted in the District Plan for the yard the side and rear property boundaries, or 3.0 rule is as follows: metres from the front property boundary. This The yard spaces provide space around dwellings means that no part of a building (except those and accessory buildings to ensure the visual listed in the exceptions above in the definition of amenity values of the residential environment are building, or in the exceptions listed in the yard rule maintained or enhanced, to allow for maintenance above) can be closer. of the exterior of buildings, and provide a break Architectural drawings sometimes show between building frontages. measurements from the slab edge or building The front yard space is to ensure a setback is frame. However, in the case of resource consent provided to enhance the amenity values of the drawings the dimensions need to be shown from streetscape, and to provide a reasonable degree the cladding, if they are not, the yard requirements of privacy for residents. -
Riparian Sites of Significance Based on the Habitat Requirements of Selected Bird Species : Technical Report to Support Policy Development
MANAGING OUR ENVIRONMENT Riparian Sites of Signifi cance Based on the Habitat Requirements of Selected Bird Species : Technical Report to Support Policy Development Riparian Sites of Significance Based on the Habitat Requirements of Selected Bird Species : Technical Report to Support Policy Development April 2007 Author James Lambie Research Associate Internally Reviewed and Approved by Alistair Beveridge and Fleur Maseyk. External Review by Fiona Bancroft (Department of Conservation (DoC)) and Ian Saville (Wrybill Birding Tours). Acknowledgements to Christopher Robertson (Ornithological Society of New Zealand), Nick Peet (DoC), Viv McGlynn (DoC), Jim Campbell (DoC), Nicola Etheridge (DoC), Gillian Dennis (DoC), Bev Taylor (DoC), John Mangos (New Zealand Defence Force), and Elaine Iddon (Horizons). Front Cover Photo Royal Spoonbill on Whanganui River tidal flats Photo: Suzanne Lambie April 2007 ISBN: 1-877413-72-0 Report No: 2007/EXT/782 CONTACT 24hr Freephone 0508 800 800 [email protected] www.horizons.govt.nz Kairanga Palmerston North Dannevirke Cnr Rongotea & 11-15 Victoria Avenue Weber Road, P O Box 201 Kairanga-Bunnythorpe Rds Private Bag 11 025 Dannevirke 4942 Palmerston North Manawatu Mail Centre Palmerston North 4442 Levin 11 Bruce Road, P O Box 680 Marton T 06 952 2800 Levin 5540 Hammond Street F 06 952 2929 SERVICE REGIONAL P O Box 289 DEPOTS Pahiatua CENTRES Marton 4741 HOUSES Cnr Huxley & Queen Streets Wanganui P O Box 44 181 Guyton Street Pahiatua 4941 Taumarunui P O Box 515 34 Maata Street Wanganui Mail Centre Taihape P O Box 194 Wanganui 4540 Torere Road, Ohotu Taumarunui 3943 F 06 345 3076 P O Box 156 Taihape 4742 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The riparian zone represents a gradation of habitats influenced by flooding from a nearby waterway. -
KI UTA, KI TAI NGĀ PUNA RAU O RANGITĪKEI Rangitīkei Catchment Strategy and Action Plan 2 TABLE of CONTENTS
KI UTA, KI TAI NGĀ PUNA RAU O RANGITĪKEI Rangitīkei Catchment Strategy and Action Plan 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS STRATEGY & ACTION PLAN 4 MIHI 6 INTRODUCTION 8 THE RANGITĪKEI 14 VISION 22 5.1 Our vision 23 5.2 Ngā Tikanga | Our Values 23 5.3 Our Strategic Goals & Objectives 24 5.3.1 Te Taiao 27 5.3.2 Our Wellbeing 28 5.3.3 Our Future 29 RANGITĪKEI ACTION PLAN 31 6.1 Te Taiao 32 6.2 Our Wellbeing 39 6.3 Our Future 40 GLOSSARY 46 TOOLKIT 49 OUR LOGO 54 3 1. STRATEGY & ACTION PLAN He tuaiwi o te rohe mai i te mātāpuna ki tai kia whakapakari ai te iwi Connecting and sustaining its people and communities for a positive future It is the Rangitīkei River that binds together the diverse hapū and iwi groups that occupy its banks OUR VALUES GUIDE OUR ACTIONS Tūpuna Awa | We are our Awa, our Awa is us Kōtahitanga | Working together with collective outcomes Kaitiakitanga | Maintaining and Enhancing the Mauri of the Awa and its tributaries Tino Rangatiratanga | Self Determination to develop and make our own decisions without impinging on the rights of others Manaakitanga | Duty of care to support other Hapū and Iwi where possible Mana Ātua | Recognising our spiritual association with Te Taiao Mana Tangata | Hapū and Iwi can exercise authority and control over Te Taiao through ahi kā and whakapapa Hau | Replenishing and enhancing a resource when it has been used Mana Whakahaere | Working Collaboratively for the Awa. 4 TE TAIAO The Awa, its trbutaries and ecosystems are revitalised and cared for by Hapū and Iwi, alongside the rest of the community through Focusing decision making on ensuring the mauri of the Awa is maintained and enhanced. -
ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT // 01.07.11 // 30.06.12 Matters Directly Withinterested Parties
ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT // 01.07.11 // 30.06.12 2 1 This report provides a summary of key environmental outcomes developed through the process to renew resource consents for the ongoing operation of the Tongariro Power Scheme. The process to renew resource consents was lengthy and complicated, with a vast amount of technical information collected. It is not the intention of this report to reproduce or replicate this information in any way, rather it summarises the key outcomes for the operating period 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012. The report also provides a summary of key result areas. There are a number of technical reports, research programmes, environmental initiatives and agreements that have fed into this report. As stated above, it is not the intention of this report to reproduce or replicate this information, rather to provide a summary of it. Genesis Energy is happy to provide further details or technical reports or discuss matters directly with interested parties. HIGHLIGHTS 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 02 01 INTRODUCTION 02 1.1 Document Overview Rotoaira Tuna Wananga Genesis Energy was approached by 02 1.2 Resource Consents Process Overview members of Ngati Hikairo ki Tongariro during the reporting period 02 1.3 How to use this document with a proposal to the stranding of tuna (eels) at the Wairehu Drum 02 1.4 Genesis Energy’s Approach Screens at the outlet to Lake Otamangakau. A tuna wananga was to Environmental Management held at Otukou Marae in May 2012 to discuss the wider issues of tuna 02 1.4.1 Genesis Energy’s Values 03 1.4.2 Environmental Management System management and to develop skills in-house to undertake a monitoring 03 1.4.3 Resource Consents Management System and management programme (see Section 6.1.3 for details). -
HRE05002-038.Pdf(PDF, 152
Appendix S: Parties Notified List of tables Table S1: Government departments and Crown agencies notified ........................... 837 Table S2: Interested parties notified .......................................................................... 840 Table S3: Interested Māori parties ............................................................................ 847 Table S1: Government departments and Crown agencies notified Job Title Organisation City Manager Biosecurity Greater Wellington - The Regional Council Masterton 5915 Environment Health Officer Wairoa District Council Wairoa 4192 Ministry of Research, Science & Wellington 6015 Technology (MoRST) Manager, Animal Containment AgResearch Limited Hamilton 2001 Facility Group Manager, Legal AgResearch Limited Hamilton Policy Analyst Human Rights Commission Auckland 1036 Management, Monitoring & Ministry of Pacific Island Affairs Wellington 6015 Governance Fish & Game Council of New Zealand Wellington 6032 Engineer Land Transport Safety Authority Wellington 6015 Senior Fisheries Officer Fish & Game Eastern Region Rotorua 3220 Adviser Ministry of Research, Science & Wellington 6015 Technology (MoRST) Programme Manager Environment Waikato Hamilton 2032 Biosecurity Manager Environment Southland Invercargill 9520 Dean of Science and University of Waikato Hamilton 3240 Technology Director National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Wellington 6041 Research Limited (NIWA) Chief Executive Officer Horticulture and Food Research Institute Auckland 1020 (HortResearch Auckland) Team Leader Regulatory -
TONGARIRO POWER SCHEME ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT // 01.07.12 30.06.13 ENVIRONMENTAL 13 Technical Reports Ordiscuss Matters Directly Withinterested Parties
TONGARIRO POWER SCHEME ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT // 01.07.12 30.06.13 ENVIRONMENTAL This report provides a summary of key environmental outcomes developed through the process to renew resource consents for the ongoing operation of the Tongariro Power Scheme. The process to renew resource consents was lengthy and complicated, with a vast amount of technical information collected. It is not the intention of this report to reproduce or replicate this information in any way, rather it summarises the key outcomes for the operating period 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013 (referred to hereafter as ‘the reporting period’). The report also provides a summary of key result areas. There are a number of technical reports, research programmes, environmental initiatives and agreements that have fed into this report. As stated above, it is not the intention of this report to reproduce or replicate this information, rather to provide a summary of it. Genesis Energy is happy to provide further details or technical reports or discuss matters directly with interested parties. 13 HIGHLIGHTS 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013 02 01 INTRODUCTION 02 1.1 Document Overview Te Maari Eruption Mount Tongariro erupted at the Te Maari Crater erupted on 02 1.2 Resource Consents Process Overview the 6 August and 21 November 2012. Both events posed a significant risk to 02 1.3 How to use this document the Tongariro Power Scheme (TPS) structures. During the August eruption, 02 1.4 Genesis Energy’s Approach which occurred at night, the Rangipo Power Station and Poutu Canal were to Environmental Management closed. -
Upper Ngaruroro River (Above Whanawhana)
Upper Ngaruroro River (above Whanawhana) Key Values Cultural Recreation (angling, rafting, kayaking) Ecology (wildlife, fisheries) Natural Character Landscape Table 1: List of documents reviewed Year Name Author 1966 An Encyclopaedia of New Zealand T.L Grant-Taylor 1979 64 New Zealand Rivers Egarr, Egarr & Mackay 1981 New Zealand Recreational River Survey G & J Egarr 1982 Submission of the draft Inventory of Wild and Scenic Rivers of National Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Importance 1984 The Relative Value of Hawke's Bay Rivers to New Zealand Anglers Fisheries Research Division - N.Z. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries 1986 A List of Rivers and Lakes Deserving Inclusion in A Schedule of Grindell & Guest Protected Waters 1988 Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat of Hawke’s Bay Rivers Department of Conservation 1994 Headwater Trout Fisheries in New Zealand NIWA 1994 Hawke’s Bay Conservancy – Conservation Management Strategy Department of Conservation 1998 Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat of Hawke’s Bay Rivers Department of Conservation 2004 Potential Water Bodies of National Importance Ministry for the Environment 2009 Angler Usage of Lake and River Fisheries Managed by Fish & Game Martin Unwin New Zealand: Results from the 2007/08 National Angling Survey- NIWA 2009 The 21 best fly fishing spots Stuff.co.nz 2010 Recreational Use of Hawke’s Bay Rivers – Results of the Recreational Hawke’s Bay Regional Council Usage Survey 2010 2011 Ngaruroro River Flood Protection and Drainage Scheme – Ecological MWH consultants Management and Enhancement -
Review of Marlborough Economic Development, Toruism and Events
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, TOURISM AND EVENTS SERVICES Final Report for Marlborough District Council March 2018 CONTENTS Review of Economic Development, Tourism and Events Services 1 Preface 7 Executive summary 8 Introduction 15 Scope 15 Approach 16 Current situation 21 Economic development services and investment in Marlborough 21 1. Are the right economic development activities being delivered? 28 1.1 What services/activities should be delivered? 30 1.2 Are there any gaps in economic development services? 50 2. Are services effective and providing value for money? 55 2.1 What outputs are being delivered? 58 2.2 What is known about the impact and effectiveness of existing services? 68 2.3 The overall effectiveness of economic development activities 101 2.5. Are services delivered cost-effectively? 103 2.6 Assessing whether the benefits of economic development activities exceed the costs 107 3. How should the services be delivered? 112 3.1 Does the existing model need to change? 114 3.3 What arrangements could be effective and efficient options for delivering economic development activities in Marlborough? 119 3.4 What is the recommended option? 125 3.5 What are the key benefits and costs of change? 126 4. How should the improvements be implemented? 128 4.1 Key opportunities and recommendations 128 4.2 Sequencing 132 APPENDICES Appendix 1 : Marlborough economic and industry trends 133 Appendix 2 : Determining a clear rationale for local government in economic development 138 Appendix 3 : Economic development services in other regions 141 Appendix 4 : Summary of national evaluation evidence 145 TABLES Table 1. Council economic development areas of focus, activities and resourcing 21 Table 2. -
Bibliography of Plant Checklists for Areas in Whanganui Conservancy
Bibliography of plant checklists for areas in Whanganui Conservancy MARCH 2010 Bibliography of plant checklists for areas in Whanganui Conservancy MARCH 2010 B Beale, V McGlynn and G La Cock, Whanganui Conservancy, Department of Conservation Published by: Department of Conservation Whanganui Conservancy Private Bag 3016 Wanganui New Zealand Bibliography of plant checklists for areas in Whanganui Conservancy - March 2010 1 Cover photo: Himatangi dunes © Copyright 2010, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN: 1178-8992 Te Tai Hauauru - Whanganui Conservancy Flora Series 2010/1 ISBN: 978-0-478-14754-4 2 Bibliography of plant checklists for areas in Whanganui Conservancy - March 2010 COntEnts Executive Summary 7 Introduction 8 Uses 10 Bibliography guidelines 11 Checklists 12 General 12 Egmont Ecological District 12 General 12 Mt Egmont/Taranaki 12 Coast 13 South Taranaki 13 Opunake 14 Ihaia 14 Rahotu 14 Okato 14 New Plymouth 15 Urenui/Waitara 17 Inglewood 17 Midhurst 18 Foxton Ecological District 18 General 18 Foxton 18 Tangimoana 19 Bulls 20 Whangaehu / Turakina 20 Wanganui Coast 20 Wanganui 21 Waitotara 21 Waverley 21 Patea 21 Manawatu Gorge Ecological District 22 General 22 Turitea 22 Kahuterawa 22 Manawatu Plains Ecological District 22 General 22 Hawera 23 Waverley 23 Nukumaru 23 Maxwell 23 Kai Iwi 23 Whanganui 24 Turakina 25 Bibliography of plant checklists for areas in Whanganui Conservancy - March 2010 3 Tutaenui 25 Rata 25 Rewa 25 Marton 25 Dunolly 26 Halcombe 26 Kimbolton 26 Bulls 26 Feilding 26 Rongotea 27 Ashhurst 27 Palmerston -
North Island Regulations
Fish & Game 1 2 3 5 4 6 Check www.fishandgame.org.nz for details of regional boundaries Code of Conduct .................................................................4 National Sports Fishing Regulations ....................................5 First Schedule .....................................................................7 1. Northland .......................................................................11 2. Auckland/Waikato ..........................................................15 3. Eastern ..........................................................................22 4. Hawke's Bay ...................................................................30 5. Taranaki .........................................................................33 6. Wellington .....................................................................37 The regulations printed in this guide booklet are subject to the Minister of Conservation’s approval. A copy of the published Anglers’ Notice in the New Zealand Gazette is available on www.fishandgame.org.nz Cover Photo: Jaymie Challis 3 Regulations CODE OF CONDUCT Please consider the rights of others and observe the anglers’ code of conduct • Always ask permission from the land occupier before crossing private property unless a Fish & Game access sign is present. • Do not park vehicles so that they obstruct gateways or cause a hazard on the road or access way. • Always use gates, stiles or other recognised access points and avoid damage to fences. • Leave everything as you found it. If a gate is open or closed leave it that way. • A farm is the owner’s livelihood and if they say no dogs, then please respect this. • When driving on riverbeds keep to marked tracks or park on the bank and walk to your fishing spot. • Never push in on a pool occupied by another angler. If you are in any doubt have a chat and work out who goes where. • However, if agreed to share the pool then always enter behind any angler already there. • Move upstream or downstream with every few casts (unless you are alone).