The Vorticity Equation • Use of the Streamfunction Allows Us To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

1 The Vorticity equation • Use of the streamfunction allows us to automatically satisfy the continuity equation. Now we will try to transform the momentum equation @u 1 + (u · r)u = − rp + νr2u @t ρ into an equation for the vorticity !! = r × u. • Here are a few results that we will use in the derivation: 1 r(u · u) = (u · r)u + u × (r × u); (1) 2 r × rφ = 0; (2) and r × × · r − · r r · − r · (u !) = (! )u (u )! + u | {z !} ! | {z u}; (3) 0 0 where the last two terms vanish because r · ! = r · (r × u) = div curl u = 0 and r · u = 0: 2 • First, we use (1) in the momentum equation to obtain @u 1 1 + r(u · u) − u × (r × u) = − rp + νr2u | {z } @t 2 ! ρ i.e. @u 1 1 2 + r(u · u) − u × ! = − rp + νr u @t 2 ρ | {z } | {z } LHS RHS • Now take the curl of the LHS: @ 1 r×LHS = (r × u) + r × r(u · u) − r × (u × !) @t | {z } 2 | {z } | {z } ! 0 because of (2) see (3) i.e. @! r × LHS = − (! · r)u + (u · r)! @t • ...and the RHS: 1 r × RHS = − r × rp +νr2 (r × u) ρ | {z } | {z } 0 because of (2) ! • Now combine the remaining non-zero terms @! 2 + (u · r)! −(! · r)u = νr !: |@t {z } D!=Dt 3 • The resulting equation is the vorticity transport equation D! 2 = (! · r)u + νr ! (4) Dt which shows that the rate of change of the vorticity of material particles, D!=Dt, is controlled by `vortex stretching' (described by (! · r)u; this is a familiar result from inviscid fluid mechanics) and by diffusion (described by νr2!). The diffusion of vorticity only occurs in viscous flows. • For 3D flows, the first term on the RHS in (4) represents vortex stretching: velocity gradients lead to a change in the rate of rotation of material particles. • Note that for 2D flows, vortex stretching is absent since u = u(x; y) ex + v(x; y) ey and ! = !(x; y) ez and therefore (! · r)u = 0. • The vorticity transport equation provides an interesting inter- pretation of the kinematic viscosity ν: The kinematic viscosity is the diffusion coefficient for the diffusion of vorticity. • Many phenomena in viscous fluid mechanics can be interpreted in terms of the diffusion of vorticity but this is (unfortunately) beyond the scope of this course. 4 • For 2D flows, the vorticity transport equation D! 2 = νr ! Dt together with the equation for the vorticity in terms of the streamfunction ! = −∇2 and u = @ =@y and v = −@ =@x provide the streamfunction-vorticity formulation of the Navier- Stokes equations, which consists of only two PDEs for the scalars ! and rather than the three equations for u; v and p in the `primitive variable' form. • Scaling arguments show that in the limit of zero Reynolds number, only one fourth-order PDE for the streamfunction needs to be solved, namely the biharmonic equation r4 = 0; where @4 @4 @4 r4 = + 2 + : @x4 @x2@y2 @y4 • This can also be shown directly by taking the curl of the Stokes equations..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Energy, Vorticity and Enstrophy Conserving Mimetic Spectral Method for the Euler Equation
Master of Science Thesis Energy, vorticity and enstrophy conserving mimetic spectral method for the Euler equation D.J.D. de Ruijter, BSc 5 September 2013 Faculty of Aerospace Engineering · Delft University of Technology Energy, vorticity and enstrophy conserving mimetic spectral method for the Euler equation Master of Science Thesis For obtaining the degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering at Delft University of Technology D.J.D. de Ruijter, BSc 5 September 2013 Faculty of Aerospace Engineering · Delft University of Technology Copyright ⃝c D.J.D. de Ruijter, BSc All rights reserved. Delft University Of Technology Department Of Aerodynamics, Wind Energy, Flight Performance & Propulsion The undersigned hereby certify that they have read and recommend to the Faculty of Aerospace Engineering for acceptance a thesis entitled \Energy, vorticity and enstro- phy conserving mimetic spectral method for the Euler equation" by D.J.D. de Ruijter, BSc in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Dated: 5 September 2013 Head of department: prof. dr. F. Scarano Supervisor: dr. ir. M.I. Gerritsma Reader: dr. ir. A.H. van Zuijlen Reader: P.J. Pinto Rebelo, MSc Summary The behaviour of an inviscid, constant density fluid on which no body forces act, may be modelled by the two-dimensional incompressible Euler equations, a non-linear system of partial differential equations. If a fluid whose behaviour is described by these equations, is confined to a space where no fluid flows in or out, the kinetic energy, vorticity integral and enstrophy integral within that space remain constant in time. Solving the Euler equations accompanied by appropriate boundary and initial conditions may be done analytically, but more often than not, no analytical solution is available.
[Show full text]
The Vorticity Equation in a Rotating Stratified Fluid
Chapter 7 The Vorticity Equation in a Rotating Stratified Fluid The vorticity equation for a rotating, stratified, viscous fluid » The vorticity equation in one form or another and its interpretation provide a key to understanding a wide range of atmospheric and oceanic flows. » The full Navier-Stokes' equation in a rotating frame is Du 1 +∧fu =−∇pg − k +ν∇2 u Dt ρ T where p is the total pressure and f = fk. » We allow for a spatial variation of f for applications to flow on a beta plane. Du 1 +∧fu =−∇pg − k +ν∇2 u Dt ρ T 1 2 Now uu=(u⋅∇ ∇2 ) +ω ∧ u ∂u 1 2 1 2 +∇2 ufuku +bω +g ∧=- ∇pgT − +ν∇ ∂ρt di take the curl D 1 2 afafafωω+=ffufu +⋅∇−+∇⋅+∇ρ∧∇+ ωpT ν∇ ω Dt ρ2 Dω or =−uf ⋅∇ +.... Dt Note that ∧ [ ω + f] ∧ u] = u ⋅ (ω + f) + (ω + f) ⋅ u - (ω + f) ⋅ u, and ⋅ [ω + f] ≡ 0. Terminology ωa = ω + f is called the absolute vorticity - it is the vorticity derived in an a inertial frame ω is called the relative vorticity, and f is called the planetary-, or background vorticity Recall that solid body rotation corresponds with a vorticity 2Ω. Interpretation D 1 2 afafafωω+=ffufu +⋅∇−+∇⋅+∇ρ∧∇+ ωpT ν∇ ω Dt ρ2 Dω is the rate-of-change of the relative vorticity Dt −⋅∇uf: If f varies spatially (i.e., with latitude) there will be a change in ω as fluid parcels are advected to regions of different f. Note that it is really ω + f whose total rate-of-change is determined.
[Show full text]
An Overview of Impellers, Velocity Profile and Reactor Design
An Overview of Impellers, Velocity Profile and Reactor Design Praveen Patel1, Pranay Vaidya1, Gurmeet Singh2 1Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India 1Indian Oil Corporation Limited, R&D Centre Faridabad Abstract: This paper presents a simulation operation and hence in estimating the approach to develop a model for understanding efficiency of the operating system. The the mixing phenomenon in a stirred vessel. The involved processes can be analysed to optimize mixing in the vessel is important for effective the products of a technology, through defining chemical reaction, heat transfer, mass transfer the model with adequate parameters. and phase homogeneity. In some cases, it is Reactors are always important parts of any very difficult to obtain experimental working industry, and for a detailed study using information and it takes a long time to collect several parameters many readings are to be the necessary data. Such problems can be taken and the system has to be observed for all solved using computational fluid dynamics adversities of environment to correct for any (CFD) model, which is less time consuming, inexpensive and has the capability to visualize skewness of values. As such huge amount of required data, it takes a long time to collect the real system in three dimensions. enough to build a model. In some cases, also it As reactor constructions and impeller is difficult to obtain experimental information configurations were identified as the potent also. Pilot plant experiments can be considered variables that could affect the macromixing as an option, but this conventional method has phenomenon and hydrodynamics, these been left far behind by the advent of variables were modelled.
[Show full text]
Vorticity and Strain Analysis Using Mohr Diagrams FLOW
Journal of Structural Geology, Vol, 10, No. 7, pp. 755 to 763, 1988 0191-8141/88 $03.00 + 0.00 Printed in Great Britain © 1988 Pergamon Press plc Vorticity and strain analysis using Mohr diagrams CEES W. PASSCHIER and JANOS L. URAI Instituut voor Aardwetenschappen, P.O. Box 80021,3508TA, Utrecht, The Netherlands (Received 16 December 1987; accepted in revisedform 9 May 1988) Abstract--Fabric elements in naturally deformed rocks are usually of a highly variable nature, and measurements contain a high degree of uncertainty. Calculation of general deformation parameters such as finite strain, volume change or the vorticity number of the flow can be difficult with such data. We present an application of the Mohr diagram for stretch which can be used with poorly constrained data on stretch and rotation of lines to construct the best fit to the position gradient tensor; this tensor describes all deformation parameters. The method has been tested on a slate specimen, yielding a kinematic vorticity number of 0.8 _+ 0.1. INTRODUCTION Two recent papers have suggested ways to determine this number in naturally deformed rocks (Ghosh 1987, ONE of the aims in structural geology is the reconstruc- Passchier 1988). These methods rely on the recognition tion of finite deformation parameters and the deforma- that certain fabric elements in naturally deformed rocks tion history for small volumes of rock from the geometry have a memory for sense of shear and flow vorticity and orientation of fabric elements. Such data can then number. Some examples are rotated porphyroblast- be used for reconstruction of large-scale deformation foliation systems (Ghosh 1987); sets of folded and patterns and eventually in tracing regional tectonics.
[Show full text]
Numerical Study of a Mixing Layer in Spatial and Temporal Development of a Stratified Flow M. Biage, M. S. Fernandes & P. Lo
Transactions on Engineering Sciences vol 18, © 1998 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3533 Numerical study of a mixing layer in spatial and temporal development of a stratified flow M. Biage, M. S. Fernandes & P. Lopes Jr Department of Mechanical Engineering Center of Exact Science and Tecnology Federal University ofUberldndia, UFU- MG-Brazil [email protected] Abstract The two-dimensional plane shear layers for high Reynolds numbers are simulated using the transient explicit Spectral Collocation method. The fast and slow air streams are submitted to different densities. A temporally growing mixing layer, developing from a hyperbolic tangent velocity profile to which is superposed an infinitesimal white-noise perturbation over the initial condition, is studied. In the same way, a spatially growing mixing layer is also study. In this case, the flow in the inlet of the domain is perturbed by a time dependent white noise of small amplitude. The structure of the vorticity and the density are visualized for high Reynolds number for both cases studied. Broad-band kinetic energy and temperature spectra develop after the first pairing are observed. The results showed that similar conclusions are obtained for the temporal and spatial mixing layers. The spreading rate of the layer in particular is in good agreement with the works presented in the literature. 1 Introduction The intensely turbulent region formed at the boundary between two parallel fluid streams of different velocity has been studied for many years. This kind of flow is called of mixing layer. The mixing layer of a newtonian fluid, non-reactive and compressible flow, practically, is one of the most simple turbulent flow.
[Show full text]
Scaling the Vorticity Equation
Vorticity Equation in Isobaric Coordinates To obtain a version of the vorticity equation in pressure coordinates, we follow the same procedure as we used to obtain the z-coordinate version: ∂ ∂ [y-component momentum equation] − [x-component momentum equation] ∂x ∂y Using the p-coordinate form of the momentum equations, this is: ∂ ⎡∂v ∂v ∂v ∂v ∂Φ ⎤ ∂ ⎡∂u ∂u ∂u ∂u ∂Φ ⎤ ⎢ + u + v +ω + fu = − ⎥ − ⎢ + u + v +ω − fv = − ⎥ ∂x ⎣ ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂p ∂y ⎦ ∂y ⎣ ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂p ∂x ⎦ which yields: d ⎛ ∂u ∂v ⎞ ⎛ ∂ω ∂u ∂ω ∂v ⎞ vorticity equation in ()()ζ p + f = − ζ p + f ⎜ + ⎟ − ⎜ − ⎟ dt ⎝ ∂x ∂y ⎠ p ⎝ ∂y ∂p ∂x ∂p ⎠ isobaric coordinates Scaling The Vorticity Equation Starting with the z-coordinate form of the vorticity equation, we begin by expanding the total derivative and retaining only nonzero terms: ∂ζ ∂ζ ∂ζ ∂ζ ∂f ⎛ ∂u ∂v ⎞ ⎛ ∂w ∂v ∂w ∂u ⎞ 1 ⎛ ∂p ∂ρ ∂p ∂ρ ⎞ + u + v + w + v = − ζ + f ⎜ + ⎟ − ⎜ − ⎟ + ⎜ − ⎟ ()⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ 2 ⎜ ⎟ ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z ∂y ⎝ ∂x ∂y ⎠ ⎝ ∂x ∂z ∂y ∂z ⎠ ρ ⎝ ∂y ∂x ∂x ∂y ⎠ Next, we will evaluate the order of magnitude of each of these terms. Our goal is to simplify the equation by retaining only those terms that are important for large-scale midlatitude weather systems. 1 Scaling Quantities U = horizontal velocity scale W = vertical velocity scale L = length scale H = depth scale δP = horizontal pressure fluctuation ρ = mean density δρ/ρ = fractional density fluctuation T = time scale (advective) = L/U f0 = Coriolis parameter β = “beta” parameter Values of Scaling Quantities (midlatitude large-scale motions) U 10 m s-1 W 10-2 m s-1 L 106 m H 104 m δP (horizontal) 103 Pa ρ 1 kg m-3 δρ/ρ 10-2 T 105 s -4 -1 f0 10 s β 10-11 m-1 s-1 2 ∂ζ ∂ζ ∂ζ ∂ζ ∂f ⎛ ∂u ∂v ⎞ ⎛ ∂w ∂v ∂w ∂u ⎞ 1 ⎛ ∂p ∂ρ ∂p ∂ρ ⎞ + u + v + w + v = − ζ + f ⎜ + ⎟ − ⎜ − ⎟ + ⎜ − ⎟ ()⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ 2 ⎜ ⎟ ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z ∂y ⎝ ∂x ∂y ⎠ ⎝ ∂x ∂z ∂y ∂z ⎠ ρ ⎝ ∂y ∂x ∂x ∂y ⎠ ∂ζ ∂ζ ∂ζ U 2 , u , v ~ ~ 10−10 s−2 ∂t ∂x ∂y L2 ∂ζ WU These inequalities appear because w ~ ~ 10−11 s−2 the two terms may partially offset ∂z HL one another.
[Show full text]
Ductile Deformation - Concepts of Finite Strain
327 Ductile deformation - Concepts of finite strain Deformation includes any process that results in a change in shape, size or location of a body. A solid body subjected to external forces tends to move or change its displacement. These displacements can involve four distinct component patterns: - 1) A body is forced to change its position; it undergoes translation. - 2) A body is forced to change its orientation; it undergoes rotation. - 3) A body is forced to change size; it undergoes dilation. - 4) A body is forced to change shape; it undergoes distortion. These movement components are often described in terms of slip or flow. The distinction is scale- dependent, slip describing movement on a discrete plane, whereas flow is a penetrative movement that involves the whole of the rock. The four basic movements may be combined. - During rigid body deformation, rocks are translated and/or rotated but the original size and shape are preserved. - If instead of moving, the body absorbs some or all the forces, it becomes stressed. The forces then cause particle displacement within the body so that the body changes its shape and/or size; it becomes deformed. Deformation describes the complete transformation from the initial to the final geometry and location of a body. Deformation produces discontinuities in brittle rocks. In ductile rocks, deformation is macroscopically continuous, distributed within the mass of the rock. Instead, brittle deformation essentially involves relative movements between undeformed (but displaced) blocks. Finite strain jpb, 2019 328 Strain describes the non-rigid body deformation, i.e. the amount of movement caused by stresses between parts of a body.
[Show full text]
Solution to Two-Dimensional Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations with SIMPLE, SIMPLER and Vorticity-Stream Function Approaches
Solution to two-dimensional Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations with SIMPLE, SIMPLER and Vorticity-Stream Function Approaches. Driven-Lid Cavity Problem: Solution and Visualization. by Maciej Matyka Computational Physics Section of Theoretical Physics University of Wrocław in Poland Department of Physics and Astronomy Exchange Student at University of Linköping in Sweden [email protected] http://panoramix.ift.uni.wroc.pl/∼maq 30 czerwca 2004 roku Streszczenie In that report solution to incompressible Navier - Stokes equations in non - dimensional form will be presented. Standard fundamental methods: SIMPLE, SIMPLER (SIMPLE Revised) and Vorticity-Stream function approach are compared and results of them are analyzed for standard CFD test case - Drived Cavity flow. Different aspect ratios of cavity and different Reynolds numbers are studied. 1 Introduction will be solved on rectangular, staggered grid. Then, solu- tion on non-staggered grid with vorticity-stream function The main problem is to solve two-dimensional Navier- form of NS equations will be shown. Stokes equations. I will consider two different mathemati- cal formulations of that problem: ¯ u,v,p primitive variables formulation 2 Math background ¯ ζ, ψ vorticity-stream function approach We will consider two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations I will provide full solution with both of these methods. in non-dimensional form1: First we will consider three standard, primitive component formulations, where fundamental Navier-Stokes equation 1We consider flow without external forces i.e. without gravity. −→ Guess: Solve (3),(4) for: ∂ u −→ −→ 1 2−→ = −( u ∇) u − ∇ϕ + ∇ u (1) n n n n+1 n+1 ∂t Re (P*) ,(U*) ,(V*) (U*) ,(V*) D = ∇−→u = 0 (2) Where equation (2) is a continuity equation which has Solve (6) for: to be true for the final result.
[Show full text]
The Influence of Matrix Rheology and Vorticity on Fabric Development of Populations of Rigid Objects During Plane Strain Deformation
Tectonophysics 351 (2002) 315–329 www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto The influence of matrix rheology and vorticity on fabric development of populations of rigid objects during plane strain deformation Sandra Piazolo a,b,*, P.D. Bons a,1, C.W. Passchier a,1 aTektonophysik, Institut fu¨r Geowissenschaften, Johannes Gutenberg Universita¨t, Becherweg 21, D-55099 Mainz, Germany bDepartment of Geological Mapping, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Thoravej 8, DK-2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark Received 18 January 2001; accepted 18 April 2002 Abstract The influence of vorticity and rheology of matrix material on the development of shape-preferred orientation (SPO) of populations of rigid objects was experimentally studied. Experiments in plane strain monoclinic flow were performed to model the fabric development of two populations of rectangular rigid objects with object aspect ratios (Rob) 2 and 3. The density of the rigid object populations was 14% of the total area. Objects were dispersed in a Newtonian and a non-Newtonian, power law matrix material with a power law exponent n of 1.2. The kinematic vorticity number (Wn) of the plane strain monoclinic flow was 1, 0.8 and 0.6 with finite simple shear strain of 4.6, 3.0 and 0.9, respectively. In experiments with Rob=3, the SPO is strongly influenced by Wn and the material properties of the matrix. Deformation of a power law matrix material and low Wn resulted in a stronger SPO than deformation of a linear viscous matrix and high Wn. Strain localization coupled with particle interaction plays a significant role in the development of a shape-preferred orientation.
[Show full text]
4. Circulation and Vorticity This Chapter Is Mainly Concerned With
4. Circulation and vorticity This chapter is mainly concerned with vorticity. This particular flow property is hard to overestimate as an aid to understanding fluid dynamics, essentially because it is difficult to mod- ify. To provide some context, the chapter begins by classifying all different kinds of motion in a two-dimensional velocity field. Equations are then developed for the evolution of vorticity in three dimensions. The prize at the end of the chapter is a fluid property that is related to vorticity but is even more conservative and therefore more powerful as a theoretical tool. 4.1 Two-dimensional flows According to a theorem of Helmholtz, any two-dimensional flowV()x, y can be decom- posed as V= zˆ × ∇ψ+ ∇χ , (4.1) where the “streamfunction”ψ()x, y and “velocity potential”χ()x, y are scalar functions. The first part of the decomposition is non-divergent and the second part is irrotational. If we writeV = uxˆ + v yˆ for the flow in the horizontal plane, then 4.1 says that u = –∂ψ⁄ ∂y + ∂χ ∂⁄ x andv = ∂ψ⁄ ∂x + ∂χ⁄ ∂y . We define the vertical vorticity ζ and the divergence D as follows: ∂v ∂u 2 ζ =zˆ ⋅ ()∇ × V =------ – ------ = ∇ ψ , (4.2) ∂x ∂y ∂u ∂v 2 D =∇ ⋅ V =------ + ----- = ∇ χ . (4.3) ∂x ∂y Determination of the velocity field givenζ and D requires boundary conditions onψ andχ . Contours ofψ are called “streamlines”. The vorticity is proportional to the local angular velocity aboutzˆ . It is known entirely fromψ()x, y or the first term on the rhs of 4.1.
[Show full text]
1 RELATIVE VORTICITY EQUATION Newton's Law in a Rotating Frame in Z-Coordinate
RELATIVE VORTICITY EQUATION Newton’s law in a rotating frame in z-coordinate (frictionless): ∂U + U ⋅∇U = −2Ω × U − ∇Φ − α∇p ∂t ∂U ⎛ U ⋅ U⎞ + ∇⎜ ⎟ + (∇ × U) × U = −2Ω × U − ∇Φ − α∇p ∂t ⎝ 2 ⎠ Applying ∇ × to both sides, and noting ω ≡ ∇ × U and using identities (the underlying tilde indicates vector): 1 A ⋅∇A = ∇(A ⋅ A) + (∇ × A) × A 2 ∇ ⋅(∇ × A) = 0 ∇ × ∇γ = 0 ∇ × (γ A) = ∇γ × A + γ ∇ × A ∇ × (F × G) = F(∇ ⋅G) − G(∇ ⋅ F) + (G ⋅∇)F − (F ⋅∇)G So, ∂ω ⎡ ⎛ U ⋅ U⎞ ⎤ + ∇ × ⎢∇⎜ ⎟ ⎥ + ∇ × (ω × U) = −∇ × (2Ω × U) − ∇ × ∇Φ − ∇ × (α∇p) ∂t ⎣ ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎦ ⇓ ∂ω + ∇ × (ω × U) = −∇ × (2Ω × U) − ∇α × ∇p − α∇ × ∇p ∂t Using S to denote baroclinicity vector, S = −∇α × ∇p , then, ∂ω + ω(∇ ⋅ U) − U(∇ ⋅ω) + (U ⋅∇)ω − (ω ⋅∇)U = −2Ω(∇ ⋅ U) + U∇ ⋅(2Ω) − (U ⋅∇)(2Ω) + (2Ω ⋅∇)U + S ∂t ∂ω + ω(∇ ⋅ U) + (U ⋅∇)ω − (ω ⋅∇)U = −2Ω(∇ ⋅ U) − (U ⋅∇)(2Ω) + (2Ω ⋅∇)U + S ∂t A little rearrangement: ∂ω = − (U ⋅∇)(ω + 2Ω) − (ω + 2Ω)(∇ ⋅ U) + [(ω + 2Ω)⋅∇]U + S ∂t tendency advection convergence twisting baroclinicity RELATIVE VORTICITY EQUATION (Vertical Component) Take k ⋅ on the 3-D vorticity equation: ∂ζ = −k ⋅(U ⋅∇)(ω + 2Ω) − k ⋅(ω + 2Ω)(∇ ⋅ U) + k ⋅[(ω + 2Ω)⋅∇]U + k ⋅S ∂t 1 ∇p In isobaric coordinates, k = , so k ⋅S = 0 . Working through all the dot product, you ∇p should get vorticity equation for the vertical component as shown in (A7.1). The same vorticity equations can be easily derived by applying the curl to the horizontal momentum equations (in p-coordinates, for example). ∂ ⎡∂u ∂u ∂u ∂u uv tanφ uω f 'ω ∂Φ ⎤ − ⎢ + u + v + ω = + + + fv − ⎥ ∂y
[Show full text]
Vorticity and Convective Heat Transfer Downstream of a Vortex Generator T ∗ Thierry Lemenanda, Charbel Habchib, Dominique Della Vallec, Hassan Peerhossainid
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Okina International Journal of Thermal Sciences 125 (2018) 342–349 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Thermal Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijts Vorticity and convective heat transfer downstream of a vortex generator T ∗ Thierry Lemenanda, Charbel Habchib, Dominique Della Vallec, Hassan Peerhossainid, a LARIS EA 7315, Angers University − ISTIA, Angers, France b Notre Dame University - Louaize, Mechanical Engineering Department, Zouk Mosbeh, Lebanon c ONIRIS, Nantes, France d Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Energy Physics Group – AstroParticles and Cosmology Laboratory (CNRS UMR 7164), Paris, France ABSTRACT Vorticity generation has been identified, since the 80's, as an efficient means for enhancing heat transfer; the mean radial velocity component due to the induced flow pattern contributes to the heat removal. In the present work, momentum and heat transfer are studied in a test section designed to mimic the industrial HEV (High- Efficiency Vorticity) mixer. It consists of a basic configuration with a unique vorticity generator inserted on the bottom wall of a heated straight channel. The aim of this work is to analyze to which extend the convective heat transfer is correlated to the vorticity, as it is presumed to cause the intensification. In this case, the driving vorticity is the streamwise vorticity flux Ω, and the heat transfer is characterized by the Nusselt number Nu, both quantities being spanwise averaged. The study is mainly numerical; we have used the previous PIV measure- ments and DNS data from the open literature to validate the numerical simulations.
[Show full text]