Torture, American Style

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Torture, American Style Torture, American Style Publication #3 .0/Historians Against the War (HAW) Contents: Introduction: Margaret Power, Editor The American Prison and the Normalization of Torture: H. Bruce Franklin Nicaragua: A Tortured Nation: Richard Grossman The Tiger Cages of Con Son: Don Luce Guantanamo Prison: Jane Franklin Torture of Prisoners in U.S. Custody: Marjorie Cohn The Abu Ghraib Scandal and the U.S. Occupation of Iraq: John Cox Introduction By Margaret Power When pictures of Iraqi prisoners tortured and abused by u.s. troops appeared on televi­ sion screens and in newspapers across the country, many Americans recoiled in horror, disgust, and shock. How could members of the u.s. military carry out such heinous acts against the people we had supposedly come to liberate? Compounding this tragic irony is the fact that the Bush administration had repeatedly offered. Saddam Hussein's use of tor­ ture against the Iraqi people as one of the many pretexts presented by the U.S. govern­ ment to try and justify its invasion of Iraq. Many in this country, especially officials in how Washington's forced occupation of Cuban the Bush administration, would like us to believe territory a century ago has led to its logical con­ that the horrific acts of torture conducted in Abu clusion - a prison. Used first for Haitians and Cu­ Ghraib prison in Baghdad were an aberration, the bans and then for captives of the "War on Terror," atypical behavior of a few bad apples. Unfortu­ the U.S. military base has become a crucible for nately, this is not the case. As the articles in this torture exported to Afghanistan and Iraq. pamphlet show, the use of torture by the U.S. gov­ Marjorie Cohn's article, "Bush & Co.: War ernment and citizens has a long and sordid history Crimes and Cover-Up,,,2 asks why the torture story both in the United States and abroad. This pam­ has virtually disappeared from the media and phlet is not an exhaustive study of the use of tor­ much of the public consciousness. To answer this ture; it focuses specifically on cases of torture question, she examines the inner machinations of conducted by U.S. citizens furthering policies the Bush administration and the history of its dis­ sanctioned by the U.S. state. I cussions and directives on torture. Bruce Franklin's article, "The American John Cox's article, "The Abu Ghraib Scan­ Prison and the Normalization of Torture," shows dal and the U.S. Occupation of Iraq," accom­ how the American prison system developed into a plishes several critical goals. It succinctly summa­ central institution of U.S. society, one that has rizes the history of the scandal at Abu Ghraib and made torture routine and acceptable. The physi­ the investigations into it and discusses who is re­ cal, mental, and sexual abuse glimpsed at Abu sponsible for the abuses. Cox also makes the im­ Ghraib is part of the daily experience for two mil­ portant point that much of the U.S. media cover­ lion people caged in American prisons, while most age of the abuse has ignored the torture of women of the rest of the American public acquiesces or and children that took place at Abu Ghraib, the denies the reality of this torture. details of which are particularly horrible. Don Luce's essay, "The Tiger Cages of Con Probably the one area of the world where the Son," reveals again, as did his original testimony U.S. government has most engaged in the use of in the 1970s, the depths to which the U.S. gov­ torture is Latin America. Torture was integral to ernment sank in its ultimately futile efforts to de­ U.S. foreign policy in Latin America, as Richard feat the Vietnamese people. It imprisoned those Grossman's article, "Nicaragua: A Tortured Na­ Vietnamese it considered "the enemy" in tiger tion," illustrates. The infamous School of the cages, subjected them to physical abuses, deprived Americas trained key Latin American military of­ them of food and water, and, as if all that was not ficers and troops, some of whom ushered in the bad enough, poured lye on them to bum and scar brutal military dictatorships that presided over them. their countries from the 1960s to the 1990s.3 In Jane Franklin's "Guantinamo Prison" reveals addition, as Grossman points out, members of the 1 2. U.S. marine force that occupied Nicaragua in the being abused and members of his or her commu­ spec early 20th century did not just teach the Nicara­ nity who care about and feel connected to the vic­ 3. ' guan Guardia how to torture, they also engaged in tim of torture. It is a weapon used by those in don it themselves as part of their efforts to terrorize power to maintain themselves in power. Nicaraguans and defeat Augusto Cesar Sandino The explicit use of sexual abuse in Abu 4. thee and his anti-imperialist forces. Ghraib has horrified many people, perhaps more The U.S. government's sponsorship of torture than any of the other methods of torture employed. 5. Stat was not limited to the training of ~atin American Homophobia and the revulsion with which many Pre! militaries. As A. J. Langguth details in Hidden Americans and Iraqis view same-sex relationships Terrors, the U.S. government also worked directly clearly shaped the sexual tortures the U.S. military 6. 1 with police forces throughout the continent. His officials inflicted on their prisoners. U.S. Guards book discusses the work of Dan Mitrione, a police forced male Iraqi prisoners to masturbate, wear chief from Richmond, Indiana, who instructed the female underclothes, and perform fellatio on each Uruguayan police force in methods of torture in other.6 That particular method of torture was used the late 1960s.4 State of Siege by .Costas-Gavras to damage, perhaps obliterate, the tortured indi­ dramatically brings to the screen the story of Dan vidual's sense of self, his or her very identity. Mitrione, the anti-democratic methods of coercion Such practices undermine an individual's will to and repression he taught the Uruguayan police resist and weaken a community's ability to sur­ force, and his subsequent kidnapping and execu­ vive. And th~t was exactly the point. tion by the Tupamaros, the Uruguayan guerrilla The torture of Iraqis, like the abuse of the force. Uruguay was not an isolated example, as prisoners in Guantanamo and Vietnam, or the Martha Huggins shows in her expose of the U.S. slaves in the U.S. south was a logical, if immoral, government training of police forces in Latin extension of U.S. state policy. The U.S. govern­ By America, with a particular focus on Brazil.s ment invaded Iraq, as it had invaded Vietllam and In order to inflict pain on people, the torturer Afghanistan, and as slaveholders had enslaved Africans. Those who were and are the victims of needs to transform the tortured into the Other, in Thl most cases the enemy Other. During the Cold occupation--either of their nations or their bodies-­ War, the U.S. government convinced many people resisted, just as the Iraqis continue to resist. In ec( in this country and around the world that "com­ order to crush opposition, U.S. government po Ii­ pn munists," a blanket term applied to those who es­ cymakers and citizens alike employed torture in an CUI poused socialism as well as to people who op­ effort to destroy the spirit of resistance and make tes posed U.S. imperialist control of their nations the people's defeat seem inevitable. were the enemy. Today, the enemy Other is the We know there are many people in this coun­ da: terrorist, who is frequently conflated with the try who are appalled and disgusted by the use of reI Muslim or Arab Other. To be an Other means to torture. The courageous actions of Joseph Darby ou be a fanatic, to be impervious to "our" morality helped bring to light the abuse of prisoners at Abu At and values; in shoI:t, to be not only less than hu­ Ghraib, just as three decades before the efforts of man, but far from human, a living machine who is Don Luce and Tom Harkin helped to expose the ni! definitely not one of US (the definition of who US criminal treatment of Vietnamese prisoners at Con in is, is seldom clear). Since this person is not one of Son. We hope that all of you who read this pam­ fOJ us, and is, in fact, intent on destroying US, then phlet will condemn any and all forms of torture e~ WE can use whatever means are available to and raise your voice to oppose its use, any time AI counter this evil force. It is within this context and anywhere. de that torture is not only allowed, it is approved. to) Some believe that those who torture do so 10) simply to extract information from the captured NOTES sc enemy. This is not entirely true, as the examples 1. There are many other examples of U.S. government sti of Abu Ghraib, the tiger cages in Vietnam, and the torture whose story nee4s to be told. If you know of pr treatment of slaves and prisoners in this country other examples and/or would like to write about them, he show so clearly. Torture is used to degrade, hu­ please contact me, Margaret Power, at miliate, and destroy both the individual who is [email protected]. 2 2. Her article was originally printed in TruthoutiPer­ Margaret Power is an anti-war activist and Asso­ spective, September 20, 2004.
Recommended publications
  • Prison Victimization: High-Risk Characteristics and Prevention
    PRISON VICTIMIZATION: HIGH-RISK CHARACTERISTICS AND PREVENTION A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts by Leslie A. Swales August, 2008 Thesis written by Leslie A. Swales B.A., Kent State University, 2006 M.A., Kent State University, 2008 Approved by Shelley Listwan, Ph.D. , Advisor Marc Colvin, Ph.D. , Chair, Department of Justice Studies John Stalvey, Ph.D. , Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES………….………………………….………………………………….v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS…………..................................................................................vi INTRODUCTION…...........................................................................................................1 Prison Victimization…………..……………..……………………………………6 Importation vs. Deprivation……….………………………………………6 Prison Inmate-on-Inmate Victimization……………….……………………...…13 Physical Victimization…………………..….……..….………….………14 Psychological Victimization……………...……………….…….……….16 Sexual Victimization………………………...……………..…………….18 Risk Factors and Characteristics………………...……………………….22 Impact of Victimization…………………………...…..…………………………29 Psychological Consequences…………...….…………………………….29 METHODS…………………………….………………………………………………..33 Sample…………………..………………...……………………………………...33 Data Collection………………….…………...…………………………………..35 Variables…………………..…………………..…………………………………36 Analysis………………………..………………..………………………………..39 RESULTS………………………………………………..………………………………40 Demographic Information…………………..……………………………………40 Prior Record………………………………….…………………………………..42
    [Show full text]
  • Transgender Woman 'Raped 2,000 Times' in All-Male Prison
    A transgender woman was 'raped 2,000 times' in all-male prison Transgender woman 'raped 2,000 times' in all-male prison 'It was hell on earth, it was as if I died and this was my punishment' Will Worley@willrworley Saturday 17 August 2019 09:16 A transgender woman has spoken of the "hell on earth" she suffered after being raped and abused more than 2,000 times in an all-male prison. The woman, known only by her pseudonym, Mary, was imprisoned for four years after stealing a car. She said the abuse began as soon as she entered Brisbane’s notorious Boggo Road Gaol and that her experience was so horrific that she would “rather die than go to prison ever again”. “You are basically set upon with conversations about being protected in return for sex,” Mary told news.com.au. “They are either trying to manipulate you or threaten you into some sort of sexual contact and then, once you perform the requested threat of sex, you are then an easy target as others want their share of sex with you, which is more like rape than consensual sex. “It makes you feel sick but you have no way of defending yourself.” Mary was transferred a number of times, but said Boggo Road was the most violent - and where she suffered the most abuse. After a failed escape, Mary was designated as ‘high-risk’, meaning she had to serve her sentence as a maximum security prisoner alongside the most violent inmates. “I was flogged and bashed to the point where I knew I had to do it in order to survive, but survival was basically for other prisoners’ pleasure,” she said.
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Perspectives: Sexual Violence in Adult Prisons and Jails
    U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Corrections Staff Perspectives SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN ADULT PRISONS & JAILS July 2007, Volume 2 Investigating Sexual Assaults in Correctional Facilities Message From the Director n September 4, 2003, President George W. Bush signed into law the The Prison Rape Elimination Act Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA), the first piece of federal legislation (PREA) of 2003 charged the National in the nation’s history to address sexual assault in correctional settings. Institute of Corrections (NIC) with PREA requires the National Institute of Corrections (NIC) to provide the the responsibility of assisting the O corrections field with information and technical assistance in the areas of pre- corrections field in addressing the vention, investigation, and sanctioning. problem of sexual violence. A key element of NIC’s assistance has been As part of its response to this mandate, NIC, in cooperation with The Moss increasing our knowledge about the Group, Inc., conducted a series of focus groups with prison and jail staff to current barriers to preventing and responding to sexual violence and collect their perspectives regarding inmate-on-inmate sexual violence in cor- developing blueprints for change. rectional facilities. A total of 332 staff were interviewed at 12 sites across the While it is important to solicit the country representing local, state, and federal facilities, including privately views of various experts, it is equally managed facilities. Participants included executives, mid-level managers, line important to understand the issue from officers, and administrative and support staff. the perspective of correctional staff. Realizing this, NIC decided early in Focus group participants responded to questions regarding the problems they its PREA initiative to interview staff encounter in preventing or responding to an incident and described any suc- at correctional facilities across the cesses their agencies had addressing the issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Segregation of Transgender People in Detention
    LITIGATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE SERIES Criminal Law and Urban Problems Course Handbook Series Number C-224 Prison Law 2010 Chair Alexander A. Reinert To order this book, call (800) 260-4PLI or fax us at (800) 321-0093. Ask our Customer Service Department for PLI Order Number 23055, Dept. BAV5 Practising Law Institute 810 Seventh Avenue New York, New York 10019 WHAT WORKS? PERSPECTIVES FROM ADVOCATES 341 342 11 SAFETY AND SOLIDARITY ACROSS GENDER LINES: RETHINKING SEGREGATION OF TRANSGENDER PEOPLE IN DETENTION Gabriel Arkles New York University School of Law Copyright © 2009 Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Review; Gabriel Arkles Gabriel Arkles, Safety and Solidarity Across Gender Lines: Re-Thinking Segregation of Transgender People in Detention, 18 TEMP. POL. & CIV. RTS. L. REV. 515 (2009). Reprinted with permission. © 2010 Thomson Reuters. Reprinted from Westlaw with permission. If you find this article helpful, you can learn more about the subject by going to www.pli.edu to view the on demand program or segment for which it was written. 343 344 18 TMPPCRLR 515 Page 1 18 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 515 c Temple Political and Civil Rights Law Review Spring 2009 Symposium: Intersections of Transgender Lives and the Law *515 SAFETY AND SOLIDARITY ACROSS GENDER LINES: RETHINKING SEGREGATION OF TRANS- GENDER PEOPLE IN DETENTION Gabriel Arkles [FNa1] Copyright (c) 2009 Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Review; Gabriel Arkles The correctional officers are the ones who are the most violent. They're the ones to be scared of. I'm raped on a daily basis, I've made complaint after complaint, but no response.
    [Show full text]
  • Male Rape in U.S. Prisons: Are Conjugal Visits the Answer?
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 37 Issue 2 Article 20 2006 Male Rape in U.S. Prisons: Are Conjugal Visits the Answer? Rachel Wyatt Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Rachel Wyatt, Male Rape in U.S. Prisons: Are Conjugal Visits the Answer?, 37 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 579 (2006) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol37/iss2/20 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. MALE RAPE IN U.S. PRISONS: ARE CONJUGAL VISITS THE ANSWER? Rachel Wyatt t I. INTRODUCTION "I had no choice but to submit to being [an inmate's] prison wife. Out of fearfor my life, I submitted to sucking his dick, being fucked in my ass, andperforming other duties as a woman, such as making his bed. " "I'm a tall white male, who unfortunately has a small amount offeminine characteristics.... These characteristicshave got me raped [in prison] so many times I have no morefeelings physically. I have been raped by up to 5 black men and two white men at a time." "I go through nightmares of being raped and sexually assaulted. I can't stop thinking about it. Ifeel everyone is looking at me in a sexual way.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts History and Social Science Curriculum Framework
    Massachusetts History and Social Science Curriculum Framework Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Draft for discussion by the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education May 15, 2018 Copyediting incomplete This document was prepared by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Members Mr. Paul Sagan, Chair, Cambridge Mr. Michael Moriarty, Holyoke Mr. James Morton, Vice Chair, Boston Mr. James Peyser, Secretary of Education, Milton Ms. Katherine Craven, Brookline Ms. Mary Ann Stewart, Lexington Dr. Edward Doherty, Hyde Park Dr. Martin West, Newton Ms. Amanda Fernandez, Belmont Ms. Hannah Trimarchi, Chair, Student Advisory Ms. Margaret McKenna, Boston Council, Marblehead Jeffrey C. Riley, Commissioner and Secretary to the Board The Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, an affirmative action employer, is committed to ensuring that all of its programs and facilities are accessible to all members of the public. We do not discriminate on the basis of age, color, disability, national origin, race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation. Inquiries regarding the Department’s compliance with Title IX and other civil rights laws may be directed to the Human Resources Director, 75 Pleasant St., Malden, MA, 02148, 781-338-6105. © 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Permission is hereby granted to copy any or all parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes. Please credit the “Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.” Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 75 Pleasant Street, Malden, MA 02148-4906 Phone 781-338-3000 TTY: N.E.T. Relay 800-439-2370 www.doe.mass.edu Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 75 Pleasant Street, Malden, Massachusetts 02148-4906 Telephone: (781) 338-3000 TTY: N.E.T.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Abuse of Inmates – Case Law Digest
    Sexual Abuse in Custody: A Case Law Survey By: Brenda V. Smith and Melissa C. Loomis Project on Addressing Prison Rape American University, Washington College of Law Developed by The Project on Addressing Prison Rape Current as of February 1, 2013. For updates, please visit: http://www.wcl.american.edu/endsilence Page 1 Sexual Abuse in Custody: A Case Law Survey Brenda V. Smith Professor of Law Director The Project on Addressing Prison Rape The Washington College of Law 4801 Massachusetts Ave NW Washington DC, 20016 Phone: 202-274-4261 Fax: 202-274-4182 [email protected] Melissa C. Loomis, J.D. Research Fellow The Project on Addressing Prison Rape The Washington College of Law 4801 Massachusetts Ave NW Washington DC, 20016 Phone: 202-274-4429 Fax: 202-274-4373 [email protected] We would like to thank Takiya Wheeler, Dean’s Fellow, for her research assistance. Developed by The Project on Addressing Prison Rape Current as of February 1, 2013. For updates, please visit: http://www.wcl.american.edu/endsilence Page 2 1st Circuit (Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Puerto Rico) I. Male Correctional Staff /Male Inmate A. Successful Inmate Claim 1. Marion v. Commissioner, Maine Dep’t of Corrections, 2009 WL 1150104 (D. Me. Apr. 29, 2009): Male correctional officers forced a male inmate to hold his own genitals in a provocative position and walk down the hall while the correctional officers, including one female correctional officer, looked on. The court denied a motion to dismiss, as forcing the inmate to hold his genitals and walk down hall without a legitimate penological purpose could be considered an Eighth Amendment violation, and a potential state law claim of assault.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Watch Comments on the National Standards to Prevent, Detect, and Respond to Prison Rape, Proposed by the Department of Justice on Feb 3, 2011
    Human Rights Watch Comments on the National Standards To Prevent, Detect, and Respond to Prison Rape, proposed by the Department of Justice on Feb 3, 2011 I. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 II. Comments on the Department’s Cost-Benefit Analysis .................................................... 3 Categories of Prison Sexual Abuse.................................................................................. 4 Differentiation between sex by force or by pressure ........................................................ 6 Abusive Inmate on Inmate Sexual contact ..................................................................... 12 Staff-on-Inmate Sex and Sexual Contact ........................................................................ 13 Prevalence versus Incidence .......................................................................................... 14 Damages Awarded in Litigation ..................................................................................... 15 Cost-Benefit Implications of Using Reasonable Cost Estimates ...................................... 18 III. The Cost of Eliminating Prison Rape .............................................................................. 20 IV. Comments on Department’s Standards for Adult Prisons and Jails ................................ 22 PREA Standards for Immigration Facilities .................................................................... 22 §115.11 Zero tolerance
    [Show full text]
  • Male Rape in U.S. Prisons: Cruel and Unusual Punishment Shara Abraham American University Washington College of Law
    Human Rights Brief Volume 9 | Issue 1 Article 2 2001 Male Rape in U.S. Prisons: Cruel and Unusual Punishment Shara Abraham American University Washington College of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/hrbrief Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation Abraham, Shara. "Male Rape in U.S. Prisons: Cruel and Unusual Punishment." Human Rights Brief 9, no. 1 (2001): 5-8. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Human Rights Brief by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abraham: Male Rape in U.S. Prisons: Cruel and Unusual Punishment Male Rape in U.S. Prisons: Cruel and Unusual Punishment by Shara Abraham* ale rape in U.S. prisons is a systemic problem that male inmates have been raped during incarceration. In violates basic human rights and constitutional pro- any event, the absence of definitive statistics on the incidence Mvisions, including the Eighth Amendment prohi- of male inmate rape should not be used to deny the grave bition against cruel and unusual punishment and the Thir- human rights crisis that is ongoing in U.S. prisons. teenth Amendment prohibition of slavery. Despite its prevalence in U.S. prisons, male prisoner-on-prisoner sex- The Elusiveness of Accountability ual abuse fails to attract serious attention.
    [Show full text]
  • 'You Are Hereby Sentenced to a Term of . . . Enslavement?': Why Prisoners Cannot Be Exempt from Thirteenth Amendment Protection Alvaro Hasani
    Barry Law Review Volume 18 Article 3 Issue 2 Spring 2013 2013 'You are Hereby Sentenced to a Term of . Enslavement?': Why Prisoners Cannot be Exempt from Thirteenth Amendment Protection Alvaro Hasani Follow this and additional works at: https://lawpublications.barry.edu/barrylrev Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation Alvaro Hasani (2013) "'You are Hereby Sentenced to a Term of . Enslavement?': Why Prisoners Cannot be Exempt from Thirteenth Amendment Protection," Barry Law Review: Vol. 18 : Iss. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://lawpublications.barry.edu/barrylrev/vol18/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Barry Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Barry Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Barry Law. : Term of Enslavement 'YOU ARE HEREBY SENTENCED TO A TERM OF... ENSLAVEMENT?': WHY PRISONERS CANNOT BE EXEMPT FROM THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT PROTECTION Alvaro Hasani* TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction......................................................274 11. Prison Slavery ................................................ 275 A. The Story of Roderick Johnson................................276 B. The Story of Michael Blucker................. ............... 277 C. The Story of T.J. Parsell .................... ................ 277 D. Enslavement of Female Inmates............................... 279 . Statistics. ............................................... 279 F. Benefits of Curtailing Prison Slavery
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Abuse in Prison: a Global Human Rights Crisis
    international summary Sexual Abuse in Prison: A Global Human Rights Crisis Sexual abuse in prisoni is a global human rights crisis. In many cases, the perpetrators are prison staff, the very people responsible for keeping inmates safe. Whether committed by prison staff or by inmates, rape and other forms of sexual abuse in prison are recognized internationally as forms of torture. It is the absolute responsibility of government to protect the safety of inmates. Sexual abuse in prison, regardless of the perpetrator, represents a government’s failure to uphold this responsibility. In most countries, there are no official studies on the prevalence of sexual abuse in prison, and few inmates come forward to report that they have been abused. However, most observers of prisons acknowledge that this lack of formal reports does not mean that prisons are safe. On the contrary, former inmates, prison staff, and human rights advocates around the world agree that most victims of sexual abuse in prison still refrain from speaking out about their experiences –sometimes from feelings of shame, sometimes out of fear of retaliation, and sometimes simply because they believe that no help is available to them. The Nature of Sexual Abuse in Prison Sexual abuse in prison can take many forms and legal terms and definitions differ from one country to another, and, within many countries, from one region to another. Just Detention International ( JDI) defines sexual abuse in prison as any un- wanted sexual contact or threat by another inmate, and any sexual contact at all by a staff member, with or without penetra- tion and regardless of the gender of the perpetrator or victim.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 an Unseen Truth 1
    Notes 1 An Unseen Truth 1. Geoffrey R. Stone, Perilous Times, W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. New York, 2004, p. 419. 2. http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/newsack:/releases/2001/09 /20010920–8.html. 3. Paul K. Davis, Besieged, 100 Great Sieges From Jericho to Sarajevo, Oxford University Press, New York, 2003. 4. It led the then US secretary of state Madeline Albright to say the death of 500,000 Iraqi children as result of sanctions was “worth it.” John Pilger, “Squeezed to Death,” Guardian, March 4, 2000. 5. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/24/us/politics/24immig.html. 6. FOX hypes stories to claim “Christmas Under Siege”: http://mediamatters. org/research/200412100006 (December 10, 2004). 7. Charlie Savage, Democratic Senators Issue Strong Warning about Use of the Patriot Act, March 16, 2012. 8. www.wired.com/dangeroom2011/07. 9. www.dhs.gov/xabout/laws/law_regulation_rule_0011.shtm. 10. Found in the former President’s autobiography, Decision Points, Crown Publishing, 2010. 11. Weekly Standard, December 5, 2005. 12. http://news.antiwar.com/2011/03/07/obama-approves-indefinite-detention- without-trial/. 13. Janine Jackson, “Whistling Past the Wreckage of Civil Liberties,” Extra, September 2011, p. 13. 14. Chris Anders, Senators Demand the Military Lock Up of American Citizens in a “Battlefield” They Define as Being Right Outside Your Window://www.aclu .org/ (November 2011). 15. http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/president-obama-signs- indefinite-detention-law. A New York judge tried to block the legislation in June 2012. Susan Madrak, Federal Judge Blocks NDAA Indefinite Detention, Crooks and Liars.
    [Show full text]