DOCSLIB.ORG

Eu National Parliaments' Representatives in the Ep

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eu National Parliaments' Representatives in the Ep EU NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS' REPRESENTATIVES IN THE EP As of 01.11.2020 Country Representative’s name and EP email address All National Parliament Representatives can be contacted either Chamber via the EP switchboard (111) or their Parliament/Chamber BE - BELGIUM Belgique/België - KINGDOM OF BELGIUM Chambre des Mr Carlos DEMEYERE [email protected] Représentants/ Kamer van Ms Katrien JOOS [email protected] volkvertegenwoordigers (House of Representatives) Deputy Representative Sénat / Senaat (Senate) Mr Michel VANDEBORNE [email protected] Ms Iuna SADAT Deputy Representative BG- BULGARIA - Бълґария - THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA Narodno Sobranie (National Mr Vladimir BERON [email protected] Assembly) CY - CYPRUS - Κύπρος - CYPRUS Βουλή των Αντιπροσώπων Ms Maria SOTIRIOU GEORGIOU [email protected] (House of Representatives) CZ - CZECHIA - Česko - THE CZECH REPUBLIC Senát (Senate) No Representative Please contact Mr Jan Grinc: [email protected] Poslanecká sněmovna Ms Eva TETOUROVÁ [email protected] (House of Representatives) DK - DENMARK - Danmark - THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK Folketinget Ms Lotte RICKERS OLESEN [email protected] Assistant: [email protected] Ms Maiken Riis TRÆHOLT 1 DE - GERMANY - Deutschland - THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY Bundestag Ms Vesna POPOVIC [email protected] Ms Jana KABAKOVA [email protected] Deputy Representative Ms Gabriela SIERCK [email protected] Deputy Representative Mr Lothar Henning STUHR [email protected] Deputy Representative Ms Antje FRANZ [email protected] Deputy Representative Assistants: [email protected] Mr Benjamin OTT [email protected] Ms Berit NARAYAN [email protected] [email protected] Mr Jan Philipp HADAMZIK Bundesrat Ms Svenja WUCHERPFENNIG [email protected] EE - ESTONIA - Eesti - THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA Riigikogu Ms Marion REIGO [email protected] IE - IRELAND - Éire - IRELAND Dáil Éireann (Chamber of Mr Paul CONWAY [email protected] Deputies) Seanad Éireann (Senate) EL - GREECE - Ελλάδα - THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC Βουλή των Ελλήνων Ms Eleni SIANNA [email protected] 2 (Vouli ton Ellinon - The Trainee: Hellenic Parliament) [email protected] Mr Angelos-Stavros ADAMAKOPOULOS-KOUFAKIS (as of 20 October 2020) ES - SPAIN - España - THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN Congreso de los Diputados Ms Carmen SÁNCHEZ-ABARCA [email protected] (Congress of Deputies) GORNALS Senado (Senate) FR - FRANCE - France - THE FRENCH REPUBLIC Assemblée Nationale Mr Pierre BOSSE [email protected] (National Assembly) Assistant: Ms Faroudja OURIACHI [email protected] Trainee: [email protected] Ms Mélanie VÉRON (as of 7 September 2020) Sénat (Senate) Mr Gian-Marco REVELLAT [email protected] Deputy Representative: [email protected] Ms Marie-Noëlle SAROCCHI- GERONDEAU HR - CROATIA - Hrvatska - THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Hrvatski Sabor Ms Tanja BABIĆ [email protected] IT - ITALY - Italia - THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC Camera dei Deputati Ms Maria SCHININÀ [email protected] (Chamber of Deputies) Senato della Repubblica Ms Beatrice GIANANI [email protected] (Senate) LV - LATVIA - Latvija - THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA 3 Saeima Mr Girts OSTROVSKIS [email protected] LT - LITHUANIA - Lietuva - THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA Seimas Ms Rūta BUNEVIČIŪTĖ rūta.bunevičiūtė@natparl.ep.europa.eu LU - LUXEMBOURG - Luxembourg - THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG Chambre des Députés Ms Elisabeth FUNK [email protected] (Chamber of Deputies) HU - HUNGARY - Magyarország - THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY Országgyűlés Mr Csaba HUSZÁR [email protected] (National Assembly) Assistant: Ms Tímea KRISTÓFFY [email protected] MT - MALTA - Malta - THE REPUBLIC OF MALTA Kamra tad-Deputati (House Mr Ian Paul BAJADA [email protected] of Representatives) NL - NETHERLANDS - Nederland - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS Tweede Kamer der Staten Ms Janneke TIMMER [email protected] Generaal (House of Representatives) [email protected] Assistant: Mr Corné BERKHEIJ [email protected] Eerste Kamer der Staten Ms Ilse VAN DEN DRIESSCHE [email protected] Generaal (Senate) AT - AUSTRIA - Österreich - THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA Nationalrat (National Ms Sophie VELBERG [email protected] Council) Bundesrat (Federal Council) PL - POLAND - Polska - THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND Sejm Ms Agnieszka WACIAK [email protected] [email protected] Mr Rafal CZARSKI 4 Senat (Senate) Mr Wojciech KUŹMA [email protected] PT - PORTUGAL - Portugal - THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC Assembleia da República Mr Bruno DIAS PINHEIRO [email protected] (The Assembly of the Republic) RO - ROMANIA - România - ROMANIA Senat (Senate) Ms Izabella MOLDOVAN [email protected] Camera Deputatilor Mr Ion-Tudor DOBRINESCU [email protected] (Chamber of Deputies) SI - SLOVENIA - Slovenija - THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA Drzavni Zbor (National Mr Zvonko BERGANT [email protected] Assembly) Drzavni Svet (National No Representative Council) SK - SLOVAKIA - Slovensko - THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC Národná Rada (National Ms. Dominika SABOVÁ [email protected] Council) FI - FINLAND - Suomi - THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND Eduskunta Mr Eero Aleksi SÄYNÄJÄKANGAS [email protected] Assistant: [email protected] Mr Jouni KAUREMAA SE - SWEDEN - Sverige - THE KINGDOM OF SWEDEN Riksdagen Mr Jakob SJÖVALL [email protected] NORWAY - NO - Norge Stortinget Mr Per NESTANDE [email protected] 5 UK - UNITED KINGDOM - THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND House of Commons Mr Kilian BOURKE [email protected] House of Lords Ms Rosanna BARRY [email protected] IPEX IPEX Information Officer Mr Calin M. RACOTI [email protected] 6 COSAC SECRETARIAT Names E-mail Status Mr Kenneth CURMI [email protected] Permanent member Ms Tanja BABIĆ [email protected] Member HR (01/08/2020 - 31/12/2020) Ms Mascha PETERS [email protected] Member DE (07/01/2020 - (Bundestag) 30/06/2021) [email protected] Ms Svenja Member DE WUCHERPFENNIG (01/01/2020 - (Bundesrat) 30/06/2021) [email protected] Ms Catarina RIBEIRO Member PT LOPES (01/07/2020 - 31/12/2021) Ms Paraskevi (Vivi) [email protected] Member EP CHAVAKI (EP Official - Directorate for Relations with National Parliaments) 7 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eudo Citizenship Observatory
    EUDO CITIZENSHIP OBSERVATORY COUNTRY REPORT: ICELAND Gudni Th. Jóhannesson, Gunnar Thór Pétursson, Thorbjörn Björnsson Revised and updated January 2013 http://eudo-citizenship.eu European University Institute, Florence Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies EUDO Citizenship Observatory Report on Iceland Gudni Th. Jóhannesson,Gunnar Thór Pétursson, Thorbjörn Björnsson Revised and updated January 2013 EUDO Citizenship Observatory Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies in collaboration with Edinburgh University Law School Country Report, RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-CR 2013/8 Badia Fiesolana, San Domenico di Fiesole (FI), Italy © Gudni Th. Jóhannesson,Gunnar Thór Pétursson, Thorbjörn Björnsson This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the authors. Requests should be addressed to [email protected] The views expressed in this publication cannot in any circumstances be regarded as the official position of the European Union Published in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Research for the EUDO Citizenship Observatory Country Reports has been jointly supported, at various times, by the European Commission grant agreements JLS/2007/IP/CA/009 EUCITAC and HOME/2010/EIFX/CA/1774 ACIT and by the British Academy Research Project CITMODES (both projects co-directed by the EUI and the University of Edinburgh). The financial support from these projects is gratefully acknowledged. For information about the project please visit the project website at http://eudo-citizenship.eu Iceland Gudni Th. Jóhannesson,Gunnar Thór Pétursson and Thorbjörn Björnsson 1 Introduction Historically, Iceland has been among the world’s most homogenous countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Chambers: Unicameral Or Bicameral?
    Legislative Chambers: Unicameral or Bicameral? Legislative Chambers: Unicameral or Bicameral? How many chambers a parliament should have is a controversial question in constitutional law. Having two legislative chambers grew out of the monarchy system in the UK and other European countries, where there was a need to represent both the aristocracy and the common man, and out of the federal system in the US. where individual states required representation. In recent years, unicameral systems, or those with one legislative chamber, were associated with authoritarian states. Although that perception does not currently hold true, there appears to be a general trend toward two chambers in emerging democracies, particularly in larger countries. Given historical, cultural and political factors, governments must decide whether one-chamber or two chambers better serve the needs of the country. Bicameral Chambers A bicameral legislature is composed of two-chambers, usually termed the lower house and upper house. The lower house is usually based proportionally on population with each member representing the same number of citizens in each district or region. The upper house varies more broadly in the way in which members are selected, including inheritance, appointment by various bodies and direct and indirect elections. Representation in the upper house can reflect political subdivisions, as is the case for the US Senate, German Bundesrat and Indian Rajya Sabha. Bicameral systems tend to occur in federal states, because of that system’s two-tiered power structure. Where subdivisions are drawn to coincide with other important societal units, the upper house can serve to represent ethnic, religious or tribal groupings, as in India or Ethiopia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins and Development of Taiwan's Policies Toward The
    The Origins and Development of Taiwan’s Policies toward the Overseas Citizens’ Participation in Homeland Governance and Decision-Making Dean P. Chen, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Political Science Ramapo College of New Jersey Presentations for the Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law Stanford University February 28, 2014 How International Relations (IR) Theories Matter? • Second-image reversed (Peter Gourevitch, 1978) – International systemic changes affect domestic politics – Domestic political actors and institutions filter the effects of international conditions, resulting in changes of interests, coalitions, norms, ideas, identities and policies • Constructivist theory of argumentative persuasion (Thomas Risse, 2000) – Interests and identities can be changed through the social interactive processes of argumentation, deliberation, and persuasion Main Argument • The Republic of China (ROC)/Taiwan’s policies toward overseas constituents have always been closely aligned with the government’s diplomatic objectives – From KMT’s pan-Chinese nationalism to Taiwan’s desire for a greater international space and political autonomy • Transformations of international politics inevitably shape the domestic political situations in ROC/Taiwan, which, then, impact policies toward the overseas community • Despite facing a rising People’s Republic of China (PRC), Taiwan’s democratization and rising Taiwanese consciousness have fostered a new set of identities, interests, and arguments that compete with Beijing’s “one China” principle
    [Show full text]
  • Westminster Seminar on Effective Parliaments 2019
    Westminster Seminar on Effective Parliaments 2019 DELEGATE BIOGRAPHIES AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES AUSTRALIA MR STEPHEN FRAPPELL Stephen Frappell is the Clerk Assistant of Committees in the NSW Legislative Council. He has held the position of Clerk Assistant since February 2012. Prior to working in the NSW Legislative Council, he worked in the Australian AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY (ACT) Senate. He holds a B Ec (Soc Sci), BA (Hons) and postgraduate LLM. MR MICHAEL PETTERSSON MLA Prior to being elected as Member for Yerrabi in the ACT Legislative Assem- bly in 2016, Michael worked for the Construction and General Division of the CFMEU. In this role, he helped local construction workers who had been underpaid by their employer. Prior to working for the CFMEU, Michael was o an elected official of the National Union of Students where he advocated for AUSTRALIA TASMANIA the welfare of students across Australia. HON TANIA RATTRAY MLC Tania Rattray was first elected in 2004 and re-elected unopposed in 2010 and 2016. She was Deputy Chair of Committees from 2008 to 2014 and from 2016 to the present. This role encompasses chairing Government AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES Administration and GBE Scrutiny Committees. She is also Chair Subordinate of the Legislation Committee (Joint House), Chair of the Government Admin- THE HONOURABLE COURTNEY HOUSSOS MLC istration Committee B, and Member and President of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, Tasmanian Branch. Prior to becoming an Elected Courtney was elected to the NSW Legislative Council in March 2015. She Member for McIntyre, Tania was the Legislative Council Deputy Mayor for is a member of a number of parliamentary committees, covering a diverse Dorset Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Þingvellir National Park
    World Heritage Scanned Nomination File Name: 1152.pdf UNESCO Region: EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA __________________________________________________________________________________________________ SITE NAME: Þingvellir National Park DATE OF INSCRIPTION: 7th July 2004 STATE PARTY: ICELAND CRITERIA: C (iii) (vi) CL DECISION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE: Excerpt from the Report of the 28th Session of the World Heritage Committee Criterion (iii): The Althing and its hinterland, the Þingvellir National Park, represent, through the remains of the assembly ground, the booths for those who attended, and through landscape evidence of settlement extending back possibly to the time the assembly was established, a unique reflection of mediaeval Norse/Germanic culture and one that persisted in essence from its foundation in 980 AD until the 18th century. Criterion (vi): Pride in the strong association of the Althing to mediaeval Germanic/Norse governance, known through the 12th century Icelandic sagas, and reinforced during the fight for independence in the 19th century, have, together with the powerful natural setting of the assembly grounds, given the site iconic status as a shrine for the national. BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS Þingvellir (Thingvellir) is the National Park where the Althing - an open-air assembly, which represented the whole of Iceland - was established in 930 and continued to meet until 1798. Over two weeks a year, the assembly set laws - seen as a covenant between free men - and settled disputes. The Althing has deep historical and symbolic associations for the people of Iceland. Located on an active volcanic site, the property includes the Þingvellir National Park and the remains of the Althing itself: fragments of around 50 booths built of turf and stone.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Foundations, Structures and Institutions of Autonomy in Comparative Law
    Legal Foundations, Structures and Institutions of Autonomy in Comparative Law Markku Suksi 1 Introduction Autonomies around the world1 as a form of organization at the sub-national level show a number of common features or dimensions that offer a basis for comparisons. The comparisons, in turn, can be used for the purposes of explaining the legal effects of various forms of autonomy and for outlining the reasons for differences and similarities. What are the key features of autonomy, how could different autonomies be compared with each other and what is the future of autonomy as a form of organization? How could the different autonomies and their relations to each other be illustrated in the visual form, as a chart, so as to make it possible to identify the mul- titude of different models of autonomy on the basis of their normative features? For such a comparative exercise to take place, a common framework or platform of comparison should be designed. In other words, a so-called tertium comparationis should be developed. For the purposes of our discussion of autonomy, it is proposed that this tertium comparationis is created against the background of the right to participation in a broad sense, encompassing both the general right to participation as identified in article 25 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights on the one hand and the right to self-determination as a meta-right of participation as pointed at in article 1 of the same Covenant. 2 Participation and Self-Determination Article 25 of the CCPR deals with participation and covers participation not only at the national level but also at the sub-national and local government level.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Tools and the Derailment of Iceland's New Constitution
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Gylfason, Thorvaldur; Meuwese, Anne Working Paper Digital Tools and the Derailment of Iceland's New Constitution CESifo Working Paper, No. 5997 Provided in Cooperation with: Ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich Suggested Citation: Gylfason, Thorvaldur; Meuwese, Anne (2016) : Digital Tools and the Derailment of Iceland's New Constitution, CESifo Working Paper, No. 5997, Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/145032 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Digital Tools and the Derailment of Iceland’s New Constitution Thorvaldur Gylfason Anne Meuwese CESIFO WORKING PAPER NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on Parliaments in Europe
    Spotlight on Parliaments in Europe Directorate for Relations with National Parliaments - Institutional Cooperation Unit Source: Comparative Requests and Answers via European Centre for Parliamentary Research and Documentation N° 28 - March 2020 Preventive and sanitary measures in Parliaments Following the COVID-19 outbreak and its consequences on the functioning of Parliaments, many national Parliaments followed the example of the European Parliament to adopt preventive and sanitary measures. Spotlight N0 28 focusses on sanitary preventive measures, changes in the work of the Parliament, travel and visitors, and the need for a statement and medical examination when entering premises. It is based on requests 4333 and 4350 submitted by the Polish Sejm on 26 February and 13 March 2020. In total 44 chambers replied to request 4333 and 39 chambers replied to request 4350. Due to the rapidly changing context of this crisis, the current situation may vary from the one outlined in this document. For updates, please contact the editor. General trends in national Parliaments Cancellation of events, suspension of visits and travel were the main trends in most national Parliaments. 37 Chambers mentioned the introduction of hand sanitizers and 30 Chambers mentioned some form of communication to staff via email, posters or intranet. Another general trend was the request to work from home, teleworking. In many Parliaments, a ‘skeleton staff’, only those who are essential for the core business, were required to go to work. Certain groups were allowed to stay at home, either because they were vulnerable to the virus (60+, medical history, pregnant) or because they had possibly contracted the virus (travelled to an affected area, in contact with a person who got affected, feeling unwell).
    [Show full text]
  • Natiolnal DEMOCRATIC INS'l'l'l'u'l'e '
    NATIOlNAL DEMOCRATIC INS'l'l'l'U'l'E' - FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS FA.. (202) 939-3 166 Fihh Fhr. I-1- Yrruchtwttr lrmw. Y.W. Washington. D.C. 2W.W (202) .W?-llZb H E-Mail 5Ym0~9@htCIMAILCOht AREAF Project Find Report DEMOCRATIC CONSOILIDATION IN NIGER, MALI AND BENIN THE ROLE OF AN EFFECTIVE LEGISLATURE Grant No. AOT-0486-A-00-2134-00 Modification #I0 January 1 to September 30, 1994 AREAF Project Final Report DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION IN NIGER, MALI AND BENIN THE ROLE OF AN EFFECTIVE LEGISLATURE Grant No. AOT-0486-A-00-2134-00 Modification #10 January 1 to September 30, 1994 I. INTRODUCTION The National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI) organized a legislative rogram program in Niamey, Niger, for deputies from the national assemblies of Benin, Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger. The primary objective of the seminar was to increase the effectiveness of these nascent assemblies and to assist the process of consolidating democratic governance in these countries. The program was planned in direct response to requests for assistance from newly elected representatives of three of the national assemblies. The program was designed in three parts: an advance visit by a small team of NDI staff and a parliamentary expert to plan for the seminar and develop a specific agenda; the seminar itself and a follow-up presence by an NDI field representative to assess the project and assist in initiatives that may have flown from the seminar. The seminar provided an opportunity for the West African participants to address problems common to their fledgling legislstures.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of the People's Republic of Benin
    Constitution of the People's Republic of Benin The High Council of the Republic, in accordance with the Constitutional Law of August 13, 1990 has proposed; The Béninese people have adopted in the Constituent referendum of December 2, 1990 the Constitution; The President of the Republic promulgates the Constitution whose contents follow: PREAMBLE Dahomey, proclaimed a Republic on December 4, 1958, acceded to international sovereignty August 1, 1960. Having become the People's Republic of Bénin on November 30, 1975, and then the Republic of Bénin on March 1, 1990, it has known a turbulent constitutional and political evolution since its accession to independence. Only the option in favor of the Republic has remained permanent. The successive changes of political regimes and of governments have not blunted the determination of the Béninese people to search for, in their own spirit, the cultural, philosophical and spiritual values of civilization which sustain the forms of their patriotism. Thus, the National Conference of Active Forces of the Nation, held in Cotonou from February 19 to 28, 1990, in giving back confidence to the people, has permitted the national reconciliation and the advent of an era of democratic revival. On the day after this Conference, WE, THE BÉNINESE PEOPLE -Reaffirm our fundamental opposition to any political regime founded on arbitrariness, dictatorship, injustice, corruption, misappropriation of public funds, regionalism, nepotism, confiscation of power, and personal power; -Express our firm will to defend and
    [Show full text]
  • Asian-Parliaments.Pdf
    Asian Parliaments Bangladesh Government type: parliamentary democracy unicameral National Parliament or Jatiya Sangsad; 300 seats elected by popular vote from single territorial constituencies (the constitutional amendment reserving 30 seats for women over and above the 300 regular parliament seats expired in May 2001); members serve five­year terms elections: last held 1 October 2001 (next to be held no later than January 2007) Bhutan Government type: monarchy; special treaty relationship with India unicameral National Assembly or Tshogdu (150 seats; 105 elected from village constituencies, 10 represent religious bodies, and 35 are designated by the monarch to represent government and other secular interests; members serve three­year terms) elections: local elections last held August 2005 (next to be held in 2008) Burma Government type: military junta (leader not elected) Unicameral People's Assembly or Pyithu Hluttaw (485 seats; members elected by popular vote to serve four­year terms) elections: last held 27 May 1990, but Assembly never allowed by junta to convene Cambodia Government type: multiparty democracy under a constitutional monarchy established in September 1993 Bicameral, consists of the National Assembly (123 seats; members elected by popular vote to serve five­year terms) and the Senate (61 seats; 2 members appointed by the monarch, 2 elected by the National Assembly, and 57 elected by parliamentarians and commune councils; members serve five­year terms) elections: National Assembly ­ last held 27 July 2003 (next to be
    [Show full text]
  • Mali Began Its Democratic Transition in 1991, When Thousands Of
    COUNTRIES AT THE CROSSROADS COUNTRIES AT THE CROSSROADS 2011: MALI 1 JAIMIE BLECK INTRODUCTION Mali began its democratic transition in 1991, when thousands of demonstrators gathered in the streets to demand that President Moussa Traoré step down after more than two decades of military rule. On March 22 of that year, the Malian armed forces fired on demonstrators, killing hundreds. On March 26, then Lt. Colonel Amadou Toumani Touré launched a military coup d‘état and arrested Traoré. With mounting popular pressure for democracy, Touré quickly established a transitional government composed of military and civilian leaders, which handed power to a democratically-elected government the following year.1 The transitional government held an inclusive National Conference in the summer of 1991 to elicit ideas from diverse groups within civil society about the country‘s democratic transition. The National Conference and a subsequent constitutional referendum laid the foundation for a political tradition of dialogue and debate that continues today.2 In January 1992 Mali held municipal councils elections, followed by legislative and presidential elections in February and March. Alpha Konaré, a former educator and democracy activist, won the presidency with the support of the Alliance for Democracy in Mali African Party for Solidarity and Justice (ADEMA-PASJ). ADEMA-PASJ drew its strength from Konaré‘s base of teachers, medical professionals, and students across Mali.3 It won the majority of seats in the legislative contest. In the 1997 elections,
    [Show full text]