Completing Description Logic Knowledge Bases Using Formal Concept Analysis∗

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Completing Description Logic Knowledge Bases Using Formal Concept Analysis∗ Completing Description Logic Knowledge Bases using Formal Concept Analysis∗ Franz Baader,1 Bernhard Ganter,1 Barıs¸ Sertkaya,1 and Ulrike Sattler2 1TU Dresden, Germany and 2The University of Manchester, UK Abstract concerned with a different quality dimension: completeness. We provide a basis for formally well-founded techniques and We propose an approach for extending both the ter- tools that support the ontology engineer in checking whether minological and the assertional part of a Descrip- an ontology contains all the relevant information about the tion Logic knowledge base by using information application domain, and to extend the ontology appropriately provided by the knowledge base and by a domain if this is not the case. expert. The use of techniques from Formal Con- A DL knowledge base (nowadays often called ontology) cept Analysis ensures that, on the one hand, the usually consists of two parts, the terminological part (TBox), interaction with the expert is kept to a minimum, which defines concepts and also states additional constraints and, on the other hand, we can show that the ex- (so-called general concept inclusions, GCIs) on the interpre- tended knowledge base is complete in a certain, tation of these concepts, and the assertional part (ABox), well-defined sense. which describes individuals and their relationship to each other and to concepts. Given an application domain and a DL 1 Introduction knowledge base (KB) describing it, we can ask whether the KB contains all the relevant information1 about the domain: Description Logics (DLs) [Baader et al., 2003] are a suc- • cessful family of logic-based knowledge representation for- Are all the relevant constraints that hold between con- malisms, which can be used to represent the conceptual cepts in the domain captured by the TBox? knowledge of an application domain in a structured and for- • Are all the relevant individuals existing in the domain mally well-understood way. They are employed in vari- represented in the ABox? ous application domains, such as natural language process- ing, configuration, databases, and bio-medical ontologies, but As an example, consider the OWL ontology for human pro- their most notable success so far is due to the fact that DLs tein phosphatases that has been described and used in [Wol- provide the logical underpinning of OWL, the standard ontol- stencroft et al., 2005]. This ontology was developed based ogy language for the semantic web [Horrocks et al., 2003]. on information from peer-reviewed publications. The human As a consequence of this standardization, several ontology protein phosphatase family has been well characterised exper- editors support OWL [Knublauch et al., 2004; Oberle et al., imentally, and detailed knowledge about different classes of 2004; Kalyanpur et al., 2006a], and ontologies written in such proteins is available. This knowledge is represented in OWL are employed in more and more applications. As the the terminological part of the ontology. Moreover, a large set size of these ontologies grows, tools that support improving of human phosphatases has been identified and documented their quality become more important. The tools available un- by expert biologists. These are described as individuals in the til now use DL reasoning to detect inconsistencies and to infer assertional part of the ontology. One can now ask whether the consequences, i.e., implicit knowledge that can be deduced information about protein phosphatases contained in this on- from the explicitly represented knowledge. There are also tology is complete. Are all the relationships that hold among promising approaches that allow to pinpoint the reasons for the introduced classes of phosphatases captured by the con- inconsistencies and for certain consequences, and that help straints in the TBox, or are there relationships that hold in the the ontology engineer to resolve inconsistencies and to re- domain, but do not follow from the TBox? Are all possible move unwanted consequences [Schlobach and Cornet, 2003; kinds of human protein phosphatases represented by individ- Kalyanpur et al., 2006b]. These approaches address the qual- uals in the ABox, or are there phosphatases that have not yet ity dimension of soundness of an ontology, both within it- been included in the ontology or even not yet been identified? self (consistency) and w.r.t. the intended application domain Such questions cannot be answered by an automated tool (no unwanted consequences). In the present paper, we are alone. Clearly, to check whether a given relationship between ∗Supported by DFG (GRK 334/3) and the EU (IST-2005-7603 1The notion of “relevant information” must, of course, be formal- FET project TONES and NoE 507505 Semantic Mining). ized appropriately for this problem to be addressed algorithmically. IJCAI-07 230 concepts—which does not follow from the TBox—holds in ing the exploration process. the domain, one needs to ask a domain expert, and the same In the next section, we introduce our variant of FCA that is true for questions regarding the existence of individuals not can deal with partial contexts, and describe an attribute ex- described in the ABox. The rˆole of the automated tool is to ploration procedure that works with partial contexts. In Sec- ensure that the expert is asked as few questions as possible; tion 3, we show how a DL knowledge base gives rise to a in particular, she should not be asked trivial questions, i.e., partial context, define the notion of a completion of a knowl- questions that could actually be answered based on the rep- edge base w.r.t. a fixed model, and show that the attribute resented knowledge. In the above example, answering a non- exploration algorithm developed in the previous section can trivial question regarding human protein phosphatases may be used to complete a knowledge base. In Section 4 we de- require the biologist to study the relevant literature, query scribe ongoing and future work. This paper is accompanied existing protein databases, or even to carry out new exper- by a technical report [Baader et al., 2006] containing more iments. Thus, the expert may be prompted to acquire new details and in particular full proofs of our results. biological knowledge. Attribute exploration is an approach developed in Formal 2 Exploring Partial Contexts [ ] Concept Analysis (FCA) Ganter and Wille, 1999 that can In this section, we extend the classical approach to Formal be used to acquire knowledge about an application domain Concept Analysis (FCA), as described in detail in [Ganter by querying an expert. One of the earliest applications of this and Wille, 1999], to the case of individuals (called objects [ ] approach is described in Wille, 1982 , where the domain is in FCA) that have only a partial description in the sense that, lattice theory, and the goal of the exploration process is to for some properties (called attributes in FCA), it is not known find, on the one hand, all valid relationships between prop- whether they are satisfied by the individual or not. The con- erties of lattices (like being distributive), and, on the other nection between this approach and the classical approach is hand, to find counterexamples to all the relationships that do explained in [Baader et al., 2006]. In the following, we as- not hold. To answer a query whether a certain relationship sume that we have a finite set M of attributes and a (possibly holds, the lattice theory expert must either confirm the rela- infinite) set of objects. tionship (by using results from the literature or carrying out a new proof for this fact), or give a counterexample (again, by Definition 2.1 A partial object description (pod) is a tuple either finding one in the literature or constructing a new one). (A, S) where A, S ⊆ M are such that A ∩ S = ∅.Wecall A ∪ S = M Although this sounds very similar to what is needed in our such a pod a full object description (fod) if .A context, we cannot directly use this approach. The main rea- set of pods is called a partial context and a set of fods a full son is the open-world semantics of description logic knowl- context. edge bases. Consider an individual i from an ABox A and Intuitively, the pod (A, S) says that the object it describes a concept C occurring in a TBox T . If we cannot deduce satisfies all attributes from A and does not satisfy any attribute from the TBox T and A that i is an instance of C,thenwe from S. For the attributes not contained in A ∪ S, nothing is do not assume that i does not belong to C. Instead, we only known w.r.t. this object. A partial context can be extended by accept this as a consequence if T and A imply that i is an either adding new pods or by extending existing pods. ¬C instance of . Thus, our knowledge about the relationships (A,S) between individuals and concepts is incomplete: if T and A Definition 2.2 We say that the pod extends the pod (A, S), and write this as (A, S) ≤ (A,S),ifA ⊆ A and imply neither C(i) nor ¬C(i), then we do not know the re- i C S ⊆ S . Similarly, we say that the partial context K extends lationship between and . In contrast, classical FCA and K K≤K attribute exploration assume that the knowledge about indi- the partial context , and write this as , if every pod in K is extended by some pod in K.IfK is a full context and viduals is complete: the basic datastructure is that of a formal K≤K K K (A, S) context, i.e., a crosstable between individuals and properties. ,then is called a realizer of .If is a fod (A, S) ≤ (A, S) (A, S) A cross says that the property holds, and the absence of a and , then we also say that realizes (A, S) cross is interpreted as saying that the property does not hold.
Recommended publications
  • Formal Concept Analysis of Rodent Carriers of Zoonotic Disease
    Formal Concept Analysis of Rodent Carriers of Zoonotic Disease Roman Ilin [email protected] Sensors Directorate, Bldg 620., Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA Barbara A. Han [email protected] Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Box AB Millbrook, NY. USA Abstract negative (non-carrier) species. The generalized boosted regression analysis built a classifier and simultaneously The technique of Formal Concept Analysis is ap- identified the top predictive features. The overall classi- plied to a dataset describing the traits of rodents, fication accuracy was 90 with the goal of identifying zoonotic disease car- riers, or those species carrying infections that can Although this method was able to identify important pre- spillover to cause human disease. The concepts dictive features across all species, further analysis was identified among these species together provide necessary to understand the interactions between these rules-of-thumb about the intrinsic biological fea- features, and to identify motifs of shared features that tures of rodents that carry zoonotic diseases, and are common among subsets of positive species. An ap- offer utility for better targeting field surveillance proach to such analysis is given in this contribution by efforts in the search for novel disease carriers in utilizing FCA. FCA was conducted on binarized posi- the wild. tive and negative contexts. We were able to identify particular biological concepts shared among rodents that carry zoonotic diseases. FCA also identified particular 1. Introduction features for which additional empirical data collection would disproportionately improve the capacity to predict Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) is a data mining technique novel disease reservoirs, illustrating the kind of discourse built on the foundation of lattice theory (Ganter, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Classification Methods Based on Formal Concept Analysis
    Classification Methods Based on Formal Concept Analysis Olga Prokasheva, Alina Onishchenko, and Sergey Gurov Faculty of Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics, Moscow State University Abstract. Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) provides mathematical mod- els for many domains of computer science, such as classification, cate- gorization, text mining, knowledge management, software development, bioinformatics, etc. These models are based on the mathematical proper- ties of concept lattices. The complexity of generating a concept lattice puts a constraint to the applicability of software systems. In this pa- per we report on some attempts to evaluate simple FCA-based classifica- tion algorithms. We present an experimental study of several benchmark datasets using FCA-based approaches. We discuss difficulties we encoun- tered and make some suggestions concerning concept-based classification algorithms. Keywords: Classification, pattern recognition, data mining, formal con- cept analysis, biclustering 1 Introduction Supervised classification consists in building a classifier from a set of examples labeled by their classes or precedents (learning step) and then predicting the class of new examples by using the generated classifiers (classification step). Document classification is a sub-field of information retrieval. Documents may be classified according to their subjects or according to other attributes (such as document type, author, year of publication, etc.). Mostly, document classification algorithms are based on supervised classification. Algorithms of this kind can be used for text mining, automatical spam-filtering, language identification, genre classification, text mining. Some modern data mining methods can be naturally described in terms of lattices of closed sets, i.e., concept lattices [1], also called Galois lattices. An important feature of FCA-based classification methods do not make any assumptions regarding statistical models of a dataset.
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Contexts, Formal Concept Analysis, and Galois Connections
    Formal Contexts, Formal Concept Analysis, and Galois Connections Jeffrey T. Denniston Austin Melton Department of Mathematical Sciences Departments of Computer Science and Mathematical Sciences Kent State University Kent State University Kent, Ohio, USA 44242 Kent, Ohio, USA 44242 [email protected] [email protected] Stephen E. Rodabaugh College of Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM) Youngstown State University Youngstown, OH, USA 44555-3347 [email protected] Formal concept analysis (FCA) is built on a special type of Galois connections called polarities. We present new results in formal concept analysis and in Galois connections by presenting new Galois connection results and then applying these to formal concept analysis. We also approach FCA from the perspective of collections of formal contexts. Usually, when doing FCA, a formal context is fixed. We are interested in comparing formal contexts and asking what criteria should be used when determining when one formal context is better than another formal context. Interestingly, we address this issue by studying sets of polarities. 1 Formal Concept Analysis and Order-Reversing Galois Connections We study formal concept analysis (FCA) from a “larger” perspective than is commonly done. We em- phasize formal contexts. For example, we are interested in questions such as if we are working with a given formal context K , that is, we are working with a set of objects G, a set of properties M, and a relation R ⊂ G×M, what do we do if we want to replace K with a better formal context. Of course, this raises the question: what makes one formal context better than another formal context.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Alignment with Formal Concept Analysis
    Conceptual Alignment with Formal Concept Analysis Uta Priss Zentrum fur¨ erfolgreiches Lehren und Lernen, Ostfalia University www.upriss.org.uk Abstract. Endres et al. (2009) use concept lattices as a model for neural decod- ing. This paper continues with that idea and presents a thought experiment of how certain structures (associative concepts) and certain processes (conceptual align- ment and filtering) might be used to model mental concepts. Several examples from the neuroscientific literature are discussed with respect to such a modelling with FCA. 1 Introduction Formal Concept Analysis1 (FCA) is a mathematical formalisation of concepts consist- ing of extensions and intensions which lead to a conceptual hierarchy (Ganter & Wille 1999). Because the natural language word “concept” refers to mental representations the question arises as to whether FCA can be used to model mental processes. There are a few papers that discuss neural applications of FCA (e.g. Endres et al. 2009) and also a few papers that discuss FCA and artificial neural networks, but so far not much re- search has ventured in that direction. Belohlavek (2000) shows that concept lattices can be learned by artificial neural networks of the type “bidirectional associative memory”. In a similar manner, Kumar, Ishwarya & Loo (2015) use FCA for modelling cognitive functions relating to memory. Kuznetsov (2004) discusses how FCA can be used to model different types of artificial neural networks. There are a few more publications in similar directions but as far as we know, the neuroscience community does not yet ap- pear to see FCA as a crucial component for modelling mental processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to Numerical Formal Concept Analysis, Bayesian Predictive Inference and Sample Size Determination
    CONTRIBUTIONS TO NUMERICAL FORMAL CONCEPT ANALYSIS, BAYESIAN PREDICTIVE INFERENCE AND SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION by JUNHENG MA Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Jiayang Sun and Dr. Joe Sedransk Department of Statistics CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY January 2011 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the dissertation of JUNHENG MA candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree Committee Chair: Dr. Jiayang Sun Dissertation Advisor Professor Department of Statistics Committee: Dr. Joe Sedransk Dissertation Advisor Professor Department of Statistics Committee: Dr. Mark Schluchter Professor Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics Committee: Dr. Guo-Qiang Zhang Professor Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science Committee: Dr. Tomas Radivoyevitch Assistant Professor Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics September 20, 2010 Table of Contents TableofContents .......................... iii ListofTables ............................ vi ListofFigures............................ viii Acknowledgement ......................... x Abstract............................... xiii I Numerical Formal Concept Analysis 1 1 Formal Concept Analysis 2 1.1 IntroductiontoFCA......................... 2 1.2 MathematicsofFCA ........................ 3 1.3 PropertiesofFCA.......................... 5 1.4 AlgorithmsforFCA......................... 7 1.5 AnExampleofFCA ........................ 8 1.6 Interpretation of Hasse Diagram . 10
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Concept Analysis
    DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE FACULTY OF SCIENCE PALACKY´ UNIVERSITY, OLOMOUC INTRODUCTION TO FORMAL CONCEPT ANALYSIS RADIM BELOHLˇ AVEK´ VYVOJ´ TOHOTO UCEBNˇ IHO´ TEXTU JE SPOLUFINANCOVAN´ EVROPSKYM´ SOCIALN´ IM´ FONDEM A STATN´ IM´ ROZPOCTEMˇ CESKˇ E´ REPUBLIKY Olomouc 2008 Preface This text develops fundamental concepts and methods of formal concept analysis. The text is meant as an introduction to formal concept analysis. The presentation is rigorous—we include definitions and theorems with proofs. On the other hand, we pay attention to the motivation and explanation of the presented material in informal terms and by means of numerous illustrative examples of the concepts, methods, and their practical meaning. Our goal in writing this text was to make the text accessible not only to mathematically educated people such as mathematicians, computer scientists, and engineers, but also to all potential users of formal concept analysis. The text can be used for a graduate course on formal concept analysis. In addition, the text can be used as an introductory text to the topic of formal concept analysis for researchers and practitioners. Contents 1 Introduction . 4 1.1 What is Formal Concept Analysis? . 4 1.2 First Example . 4 1.3 Historical Roots and Development . 5 2 Concept Lattices . 6 2.1 Input data . 6 2.2 Concept-Forming Operators . 6 2.3 Formal Concepts and Concept Lattice . 7 2.4 Formal Concepts as Maximal Rectangles . 9 2.5 Basic Mathematical Structures Behind FCA: Galois Connections and Closure Operators . 10 2.6 Main Theorem of Concept Lattices . 15 2.7 Clarification and Reduction of Formal Concepts .
    [Show full text]
  • Completing Terminological Axioms with Formal Concept Analysis
    Completing Terminological Axioms with Formal Concept Analysis Alexandre Bazin and Jean-Gabriel Ganascia Universit´ePierre et Marie Curie, Laboratoire d'Informatique de Paris 6 Paris, France [email protected] [email protected] Abstract. Description logics are a family of logic-based formalisms used to represent knowledge and reason on it. That knowledge, under the form of concepts and relationships between them called terminological axioms, is usually manually entered and used to describe objects in a given domain. That operation being tiresome, we would like to automat- ically learn those relationships from the set of instances using datamining techniques. In this paper, we study association rules mining in the de- scription logic EL. First, we characterize the set of all possible concepts in a given EL language. Second, we use those characteristics to develop an algorithm using formal concept analysis to mine the rules more effi- ciently. Keywords: Description Logic, Association Rules Mining, Ontology 1 Introduction Ontologies are knowledge representation tools used in various domains of appli- cation. The semantic web, for example, makes an extensive use of them. They are essentially composed of a list of concepts relevant to a particular domain and relations (mainly inclusion and equivalence, i.e. hierarchical relations) ex- isting between them. Description Logics (DL) are increasingly popular logical frameworks used to represent ontologies and on which is based the OWL1 lan- guage for the semantic Web. They have a great representation power and allow powerful reasoning tools. However, the construction of ontologies, usually per- formed manually by knowledge engineers, is both a tedious and tricky operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Concept Analysis: Themes and Variations for Knowledge Processing
    Formal Concept Analysis: Themes and Variations for Knowledge Processing Sergei O. Kuznetsov1 and Amedeo Napoli2 1 Department of Data Analysis and Artificial Intelligence Faculty of Computer Science National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia 2 LORIA (CNRS – INRIA Nancy Grand-Est – Université de Lorraine) B.P. 239, 54506 Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France [email protected];[email protected] Tutorial on Formal Concept Analysis at IJCAI 2015 IJCAI 2015, Buenos Aires, July 27th 2015 Introduction A Smooth Introduction to Formal Concept Analysis Relational Concept Analysis Pattern Structures Conclusion and References Summary of the presentation Introduction A Smooth Introduction to Formal Concept Analysis Three points of view on a binary table Derivation operators, formal concepts and concept lattice The structure of the concept lattice Relational Concept Analysis Pattern Structures Conclusion and References S.O. Kuznetsov and A. Napoli FCA Tutorial at IJCAI 2015 Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) I The process of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) is applied on Data large volumes of complex data for Selection and preparation discovering patterns which are significant and reusable. Prepared data Data I KDD is based on three main mining operations: data preparation, data Discovered patterns mining, and interpretation of the Interpretation / extracted units. Evaluation I KDD is iterative, i.e. it can be Interpreted patterns replayed, and interactive, i.e. it is guided by an analyst. Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) Data are diverse in nature and Data complexity: Selection and preparation I Boolean Prepared data I numbers Data mining I symbols Discovered patterns I sequences (time series. ) Interpretation / I trees, graphs Evaluation Interpreted patterns I texts (images, speech.
    [Show full text]
  • An Application of Formal Concept Analysis to Neural Decoding
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository An Application of Formal Concept Analysis to Neural Decoding Dominik Endres1, Peter F¨oldi´ak1, and Uta Priss2 1School of Psychology, University of St. Andrews, {dme2,pf2}@st-andrews.ac.uk 2School of Computing, Napier University, [email protected] Abstract. This paper proposes a novel application of Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) to neural decoding: the semantic relationships between the neural representations of large sets of stimuli are explored using concept lattices. In particular, the effects of neural code sparsity are modelled using the lattices. An exact Bayesian approach is employed to construct the formal context needed by FCA. This method is explained using an example of neurophysiological data from the high-level visual cortical area STSa. Prominent features of the resulting concept lattices are discussed, including indications for a product-of-experts code in real neurons. 1 Introduction Mammalian brains consist of billions of neurons, each capable of independent electrical activity. From an information-theoretic perspective, the patterns of activation of these neurons can be understood as the codewords comprising the neural code. The neural code describes which pattern of activity corresponds to what information item. We are interested in the (high-level) visual system, where such items may indicate the presence of a stimulus object or the value of some stimulus attribute, assuming that each time this item is represented the neural activity pattern will be the same or at least similar. Neural decoding is the attempt to reconstruct the stimulus from the observed pattern of activation in a given population of neurons [1,2,3,4].
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Concept Analysis for Concept Collecting and Their Analysis*
    Formal Concept Analysis for Concept Collecting .. Darius Jurkevicius, Olegas Vasilecas SCIeNTIfIC PAPeRS, UNIVeRSITy of Latvia, 2009. Vol. 751 COMPUTER SCIENCE AND Information TECHNOLOGIES 22–39 P. Formal Concept Analysis for Concept Collecting and Their Analysis* Darius Jurkevicius1 and Olegas Vasilecas2, 3 1 Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Fundamental Sciences, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius-40, Lithuania, [email protected] 2 Information Systems Research Laboratory, Faculty of Fundamental Sciences, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius-40, Lithuania, [email protected] 3 Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Klaipeda University, Herkaus Manto 84, LT-92294 Klaipeda, [email protected] The method how to collect concepts and analyse them using formal concepts analysis is presented in this paper. This method allows representing of the hierarchical tree of concepts without analyzing terms in a specific domain. The main idea of the proposed method is to select concepts (objects) from collected data of specific domain using templates. Later the collected terms are analyzed using the formal concept analysis method. This allows to simplify the steps of term analysis and ontology representing in the ontology development process. We propose to use the logical structure of context that allows to extend the traditional context. It allows to save more data in the context and to simplify the usage of context in information systems. We call this extended formal context distributional formal context. In this paper, the real estate domain was selected for the experiment and its results are presented. Keywords: formal concepts analysis, formal context, formal concept, multi-formal context, distributional formal context, concept collecting.
    [Show full text]
  • Representing Numeric Values in Concept Lattices
    Representing Numeric Values in Concept Lattices John L. Pfaltz Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Virginia Charlottesville, VA 22904-4740 [email protected] Abstract. Formal Concept Analysis is based on the occurrence of symbolic attributes in individual objects, or observations. But, when the attribute is numeric, treatment has been awkward. In this paper, we show how one can derive logical implications in which the atoms can be not only boolean symbolic attributes, but also ordinal inequalities, such as x ≤ 9. This extension to ordinal values is new. It employs the fact that orderings are antimatroid closure spaces. 1 Extending Formal Concept Analysis Formal Concept Analysis (FCA), which was initially developed by Rudolf Wille and Bernhard Gan- ter [3], provides a superb way of describing “concepts”, that is closed sets of attributes, or properties, within a context of occurrences, or objects. One can regard the concept as a closed set of objects with common attributes. Frequently clusters of these concepts, together with their structure, stand out with vivid clarity. However, two unresolved problems are often encountered. First, when con- cept lattices become large, it is hard to discern or describe significant clusters of related concepts. Gregor Snelting used formal concept analysis to analyze legacy code [6,14].1 Snelting’s goal was to reconstruct the overall system structure by determining which variables (attributes or columns) were accessed by which modules (objects or rows). It was hoped that the concept structure would become visually apparent. Unfortunately, the resulting concept lattice shown on page 356 of [6] is little more than a black blob.
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Concept Analysis Based Association Rules Extraction
    IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 8, Issue 4, No. 2, July 2011 ISSN (Online): 1694-0814 www.IJCSI.org 490 Formal Concept Analysis Based Association Rules Extraction Ben Boubaker Saidi Ourida1 and Tebourski Wafa2 1 Computer Science Department, High Institute of Management, University of Tunis, Bouchoucha, Bardo-Tunis, Tunisie 2 Computer Science Department, High Institute of Management, University of Tunis, Bouchoucha, Bardo-Tunis, Tunisie ABSTRACT In this paper, we introduce a novel approach of association rules mining based Generating a huge number of association rules on Formal Concept Analysis. reduces their utility in the decision making process, done by domain experts. In this The remainder of the paper is organized as context, based on the theory of Formal follows. We outline in Section 2 the Concept Analysis, we propose to extend the association rules derivation problem. notion of Formal Concept through the Section 3 introduces the mathematical generalization of the notion of itemset in order background of FCA and its connection with to consider the itemset as an intent, its the derivation of association rule bases. We support as the cardinality of the extent and present, in Section 4, an heuristic algorithm its relevance which is related to the confidence to calculate the optimal itemsets from rows of rule. Accordingly, we propose a new of data. Section 5 describes the results of approach to extract interesting itemsets the experimental study. Illustrative through the concept coverage. This approach uses a new quality-criteria of a rule: the examples are given throughout the paper. relevance bringing a semantic added value to Section 6 concludes this paper and points formal concept analysis approach to discover out future research directions.
    [Show full text]