DOCSLIB.ORG

Presidência Da República

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Presidência Da República PRESIDÊNCIA DA REPÚBLICA Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva – Presidente MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE Maria Osmarina Marina da Silva Vaz Lima - Ministra INSTITUTO CHICO MENDES DE CONSERVAÇÃO DA BIODIVERSIDADE João Paulo Ribeiro Capobianco – Presidente Interino DIRETORIA DE UNIDADES DE CONSERVAÇÃO DE PROTEÇÃO INTEGRAL Júlio Gonchorosky – Diretor PARQUE NACIONAL DA RESTINGA DE JURUBATIBA Eduardo Jalles Jardim – Responsável pelo Parque RIO DE JANEIRO – ABRIL / 2008 CRÉDITOS TÉCNICOS E INSTITUCIONAIS INSTITUTO CHICO MENDES DE CONSERVAÇÃO DA BIODIVERSIDADE Diretoria de Unidades de Conservação de Proteção Integral • Júlio Gonchorosky - Diretor EQUIPE DE ELABORAÇÃO DO PLANO DE MANEJO DO PARQUE NACIONAL DA RESTINGA DE JURUBATIBA Coordenação Geral • Carlos Fernando Fischer, Eng. Agrônomo, M.Sc. Coordenação Técnica • Maria Fernanda Santos Quintela da Costa Nunes, D.Sc. Equipe de Planejamento • Carlos Fernando Anicet Fischer, M.Sc. • Edna Maia Machado Guimarães, D.Sc. • Eduardo Jalles Jardim (responsável pelo parque) • Flávia Colacchi, M.Sc. • Jorge Luiz Dias de Mello (analista administrativo) • Leonardo Boquimpani de Freitas, M.Sc. • Marcos Cezar dos Santos (analista ambiental) • Maria Fernanda Santos Quintela da Costa Nunes, D.Sc. • Moacir Bueno Arruda, D.Sc. Equipe Técnica • Ana Carolina Marques de Oliveira (ecologia), Bióloga • Anderson J. F. de Oliveira (ecologia), M.Sc. • André Furtado (ecossistemas lagunares), D.Sc. • Carlos Eduardo Góes Jamel (geoprocessamento), Biólogo • Carlos Machado (designer gráfico) • Carolina Dunshee de Carvalho (legislação), M.Sc. • Dalila Silva Mello (turismo), M.Sc. • Daniele Paulo de Campos (contextualização da UC), M.Sc. • Dorcas Vieira Damasceno (revisão da língua portuguesa) • Edna Maia Machado Guimarães (sócio-economia), D.Sc. • Flávia Colacchi (geoprocessamento), M.Sc. • Márcia Moura Franco (comunicação e fotografia), Bióloga • Ricardo Machado Darigo (vegetação), M.Sc. • Roberto Eizembeg dos Santos (direção e realização do vídeo e do CD de divulgação Científica), M.Sc. • Roberto Rezende (moderador da oficina de planejamento), M.Sc. • Vladis Caputo (meio físico), Engenheiro Químico Instituições Colaboradoras: • ONG – Associação dos Amigos do Parque da Restinga de Jurubatiba • Prefeitura de Carapebus • Prefeitura de Quissamã • Prefeitura de Macaé Equipe de Apoio • Estêvão Teodoro da Silva (informática) • Julio Cesar de Azevedo Lisboa (informática e editoração do documento) • Reginaldo Banharo (apoio geral), Biólogo Estagiários • Alexandra Naya Magalhães (geoprocessamento) • Adriana Conti Rezende (sócio-economia) • Bruno Fiedler de Oliveira (bibliografia) • Michele de Oliveira Macedo (sócio-economia) • Gustavo Pereira (sócio-economia) • Iça Barri (ecologia) • Bruno Eduardo Pereira dos Santos (orçamento) Revisão • Valquíria Gonçalves – Engenheira Florestal – Equipe Base Proecos NOTA: A revisão referida consistiu-se em realocar os itens que tratavam da Zona de Amortecimento definida para o Parque Nacional da Restinga de Jurubatiba para o Anexo 1 do Encarte 2 do Plano de Manejo, apresentando-os como proposições para a ZA do Parque. Este procedimento foi adotado de modo a cumprir as novas orientações repassadas pela Diretoria de Unidades de Conservação de Proteção Integral – DIREP, do Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade – ICMBio, as quais sugerem que os novos planos de manejo a serem aprovados pelo ICMBio, apresentem apenas propostas de delimitação e normatização para as zonas de amortecimento. Recursos Financeiros: • PETROBRAS TRANSPORTE S.A. • TRANSPETRO Profissional de Meio Ambiente SMS – André Luis Chauvet de Andrade PhD SIGLAS E CONVENÇÕES % - porcentagem µg – Micrograma – Unidade de medida Abr - Abril Ago – Agosto AMDA – Associação Macaense de Defesa Ambiental APA – Área de Proteção Ambiental APAJ - Associação dos Amigos do Parque de Jurubatiba BPFMA – Batalhão da Polícia Florestal e do Meio Ambiente C. E.– Centro Educacional CBMERJ - Corpo de Bombeiros Militar do Estado do Rio de Janeiro CEFET – Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica CENPES/PETROBRAS – Centro de Pesquisas da Petrobrás CIDE – Centro de Informações e Dados do Estado do Rio de Janeiro CIEP - Centro Integrado de Educação Pública cm - centímetro CNPq – Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico COD - Carbono Orgânico Dissolvido Cond. – condutividade CPRM – Companhia de Pesquisa de Recursos Minerais D.Sc. – Doctor of Science (Doutor em Ciências) DAC – Diretoria de Aviação Civil Dez - Dezembro DRM-RJ - Departamento de Recursos Minerais do Rio de Janeiro. E.E – Escola Estadual E.M. – Escola Municipal Eco-92 - Conferência da Organização das Nações Unidas (ONU) sobre Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento EMBRAPA – Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária ETE - Estação de Tratamento de Esgoto FEEMA – Fundação Estadual de Engenharia e Meio Ambiente Fev - fevereiro GTZ – Deutsche Gesellschaft Fur Technische Zusammenarbeit – Agência Alemã de Cooperação Técnica ha – hectare IBAMA – Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis IBDF – Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal ICMBio – Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade INMET – Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia INPE – Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais ITC - Índice de Trofia de Carlson Jan - Janeiro Jul - Julho Jun – Junho Kg - Kilograma Km – Quilômetro Km2 – Quilômetro ao quadrado m – Unidade de Medida – metro M. Sc – Master of Sciences ( Mestre de Ciências) m2 – metro quadrado Mai - Maio Mar - março mm – Milímetro – Escala de Medida MMA – Ministério do Meio Ambiente, dos Recursos Hídricos e da Amazônia Legal MRA – Macroregião Ambiental nº – Número NOD - Nitrogênio Orgânico Dissolvido Nov - Novembro NUPEM/UFRJ – Núcleo de Pesquisas Ecológicas de Macaé/Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro ºC – Graus Celsius ONG – Organização Não-Governamental ONU – Organização das Nações Unidas Out - Outubro PELD - Programa de Pesquisas Ecológicas de Longa Duração PETROBRAS – Petróleo Brasileiro S.A pH- Potencial de Hidrogeinização PN – Parque Nacional ppm – partes por milhão Prof. - Profundidade RAIA - Rede Ambienalista de Informação e Ação RB – Reserva Biológica RJ – Estado do Rio de Janeiro ROI – Registro de Ocorrência de Incêndios Sal. - Salinidade SBF – Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas SEMADS – Secretaria Estadual de Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável Set - Setembro TECAB - Terminal de Cabiúnas Temp. – Temperatura TRANSPETRO – Petrobras Transportes S.A UC – Unidade de Conservação UENF – Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense UERJ – Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro UFF – Universidade Federal Fluminense UFRJ – Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro UFSCar - Universidade Federal de São Carlos UNB – Universidade de Brasília UNESCO – Organização das Nações Unidas para a Educação, Ciência e Cultura UNICAMP – Universidade Federal de Campinas UNIRIO – Universidade do Rio de Janeiro USP – Universidade de São Paulo UTM – Universal Transversal de Mercator APRESENTAÇÃO Este é o terceiro documento do Plano de Manejo do Parque Nacional da Restinga de Jurubatiba – Encarte 3, que apresenta a análise da Unidade de Conservação. Neste documento, apresentam-se os resultados dos diagnósticos ambiental e sócio- econômico do Parque Nacional da Restinga de Jurubatiba. Apresentam-se, também, informações sobre as situações conflitantes, existentes atualmente, bem como as atividades apropriadas desenvolvidas na UC, além de informações sobre seus aspectos institucionais, sua estrutura organizacional, recursos financeiros orçados e gastos nos últimos anos, as fontes potenciais de recursos, a cooperação institucional e, por último, com base nos conhecimentos obtidos no diagnóstico, a declaração de sua significância, em termos de representatividade e importância ecológica, entre outros atributos. SUMÁRIO SIGLAS E CONVENÇÕES .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 APRESENTAÇÃO ....................................................................................................................................................................... 8 SUMÁRIO .................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 3. – ANÁLISE DA UNIDADE DE CONSERVAÇÃO .................................................................................................................. 13 3.1. – Informações gerais sobre a Unidade de Conservação .......................................................................................... 13 3.1.1. – Acesso à Unidade ............................................................................................................................................. 13 3.1.2. – Limites da UC ................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.1.3. – Origem do nome e histórico de criação da UC .................................................................................................. 18 3.1.4. – Razões do enquadramento da UC na categoria de Parque Nacional ................................................................ 21 3.2. – Caracterização dos Fatores Abióticos e Bióticos .................................................................................................. 22 3.2.1. – Caracterização do Clima ..................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fruit-Feeding Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) of the Área De
    Biota Neotropica 15(3): e20140118, 2015 www.scielo.br/bn inventory Fruit-feeding butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) of the A´ rea de Protec¸a˜o Especial Manancial Mutuca, Nova Lima and Species list for the Region of Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil Andre´ Roberto Melo Silva1,3,4, Douglas Vitor Pontes1, Marco Paulo Guimara˜es1,3, Marina Vicente de Oliveira1, Lucas Tito Faria de Assis1 & Marcio Uehara-Prado2 1Centro Universita´rio UNA, Faculdade de Cieˆncias Biolo´gicas e da Sau´de, Rua Guajajaras, 175, Centro, CEP 30180-100, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. 2Instituto Neotropical: Pesquisa e Conservac¸a˜o Caixa Postal 19009, CEP 81531-980, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. 3Rede de Pesquisa e Conservac¸a˜o de Lepido´pteros de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. 4Corresponding author: Andre´ Roberto Melo Silva, e-mail: andrerml.hotmail.com SILVA, A.R.M., PONTES, D.V., GUIMARA˜ ES, M.P., OLIVEIRA, M.V., ASSIS, L.T.F., UEHARA- PRADO, M. Fruit-feeding butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) of the A´ rea de Protec¸a˜o Especial Manancial Mutuca, Nova Lima and Species list for the Region of Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Biota Neotropica. 15(3): e20140118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1676-06032015011814 Abstract: A study of the assembly of fruit-feeding butterflies in the A´ rea de Protec¸a˜o Especial Manancial Mutuca, Nova Lima, MG was conducted with the goal of inventorying the species of the site. Forty-two traps were used to attract fruit-feeding butterflies, divided between Cerrado (rupestrian field) and riparian vegetation, monthly over one year. 2245 butterflies, which belonged to 63 species, were recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Appendix 3. Thousand Islands National Park Taxonomy Report
    Appendix 3. Thousand Islands National Park Taxonomy Report Class Order Family Genus Species Arachnida Araneae Agelenidae Agelenopsis Agelenopsis potteri Agelenopsis utahana Anyphaenidae Anyphaena Anyphaena celer Hibana Hibana gracilis Araneidae Araneus Araneus bicentenarius Larinioides Larinioides cornutus Larinioides patagiatus Clubionidae Clubiona Clubiona abboti Clubiona bishopi Clubiona canadensis Clubiona kastoni Clubiona obesa Clubiona pygmaea Elaver Elaver excepta Corinnidae Castianeira Castianeira cingulata Phrurolithus Phrurolithus festivus Dictynidae Emblyna Emblyna cruciata Emblyna sublata Eutichuridae Strotarchus Strotarchus piscatorius Gnaphosidae Herpyllus Herpyllus ecclesiasticus Zelotes Zelotes hentzi Linyphiidae Ceraticelus Ceraticelus atriceps 1 Collinsia Collinsia plumosa Erigone Erigone atra Hypselistes Hypselistes florens Microlinyphia Microlinyphia mandibulata Neriene Neriene radiata Soulgas Soulgas corticarius Spirembolus Lycosidae Pardosa Pardosa milvina Pardosa moesta Piratula Piratula canadensis Mimetidae Mimetus Mimetus notius Philodromidae Philodromus Philodromus peninsulanus Philodromus rufus vibrans Philodromus validus Philodromus vulgaris Thanatus Thanatus striatus Phrurolithidae Phrurotimpus Phrurotimpus borealis Pisauridae Dolomedes Dolomedes tenebrosus Dolomedes triton Pisaurina Pisaurina mira Salticidae Eris Eris militaris Hentzia Hentzia mitrata Naphrys Naphrys pulex Pelegrina Pelegrina proterva Tetragnathidae Tetragnatha 2 Tetragnatha caudata Tetragnatha shoshone Tetragnatha straminea Tetragnatha viridis
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Diversidad De Mariposas Diurnas Y Especies Con Potencial Productivo En Un Paisaje Fragmentado, Reserva Maku, Sierra Nevada De Santa Marta
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositorio Digital Universidad del Magdalena 2013 DIVERSIDAD DE MARIPOSAS DIURNAS Y ESPECIES CON POTENCIAL PRODUCTIVO EN UN PAISAJE FRAGMENTADO, RESERVA MAKU, SIERRA NEVADA DE SANTA MARTA MARJORIE MOLINA LUBO UNIVERSIDAD DEL 0 MAGDALENA DIVERSIDAD DE MARIPOSAS DIURNAS (LEPIDOPTERA: PAPILIONOIDEA) Y ESPECIES CON POTENCIAL PRODUCTIVO, EN UN PAISAJE FRAGMENTADO, RESERVA NÁMAKU, SIERRA NEVADA DE SANTA MARTA Autora MARJORIE MOLINA LUBO Trabajo de Grado para optar por el título de Bióloga Director JOSE F. GONZALEZ-MAYA PhD(c) Asesor DIEGO ZARRATE-CHARRY Esp. UNIVERSIDAD DEL MAGDALENA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS BASICAS PROGRAMA DE BIOLOGIA SANTA MARTA, 2013 0 Nota de Aceptación _______________________________ ----------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- ______________________________ Firma del presidente del jurado ______________________________ Firma del Jurado ______________________________ Firma del Jurado Santa Marta, 2013 0 AGRADECIMIENTOS Este trabajo fue realizado con la ayuda de muchas personas que ofrecieron su amistad, tiempo, o conocimientos, a quienes quiero agradecerles profundamente por haberme apoyado en este proceso que ha sido un reto tanto profesional como personal muy importante. A Jose Gonzales y Diego Zarrate, quienes dirigieron este trabajo, gracias por su paciencia, apoyo y seguimiento especialmente en el proceso de redacción. Quiero agradecer también al profesor Giovanny Fagua, quien me asesoro y ofreció las herramientas necesarias para la determinación taxonómica de las mariposas. Fue una experiencia muy buena el haber estado en el grupo de sus alumnos, gracias a todos por su amabilidad, confianza y buena disposición. Le agradezco a los que en determinado momento estuvieron acompañándome en campo, a Alvarito, Alfonso, Nora, Diego y Jose.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium
    Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats A Symposium y Edited b Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-145 DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Some editing was done to ensure a consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers and the quality of illustrative materials. Cover photos: Large photo: Craig W. Stihler; small left photo: Joseph S. Johnson; small middle photo: Craig W. Stihler; small right photo: Matthew J. Clement. December 2011 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats: A Symposium Athens, Georgia March 9–10, 2010 Edited by: Susan C. Loeb U.S Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Michael J. Lacki University of Kentucky Darren A. Miller Weyerhaeuser NR Company Sponsored by: Forest Service Bat Conservation International National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Offield Family Foundation ContEntS Preface . v Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats: An Introduction . 1 Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller Distribution and Status of Eastern Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus Spp .) . 13 Mylea L. Bayless, Mary Kay Clark, Richard C. Stark, Barbara S.
    [Show full text]
  • Eugene Le Moult's Prepona Types (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae, Charaxinae)
    BULLETIN OF THE ALLYN MUSEUM Published by THE ALLYN MUSEUM OF ENTOMOLOGY Sarasota, Florida Number... 21 21 Oct. 1974 EUGENE LE MOULT'S PREPONA TYPES (LEPIDOPTERA: NYMPHALIDAE, CHARAXINAE) R. 1. Vane-Wright British Museum (Natural History), London This paper deals with the type material of butterflies belonging to the S. American genus Prepona Boisduval, described by Eugene Le Moult in his work Etudes sur les Prepona (1932). Le Moult was an insect dealer somewhat infamous in entomological circles; for present purposes it will suffice to say that he published most of his work privately, many of his taxonomic conclusions were unsound, and he was a "splitter", subdividing many previously accepted species on little evidence. He was also inclined to describe very minor variations as aberrations or other infrasubspecific categories. Reference to his type material is usually essential when revisional work is undertaken on the groups he touched upon. Le Moult's Prepona 'Etude' was never completed; that part which was published appeared after 'Seitz', and there is undoubtedly much synonymy to unravel. It is hoped that the present work will be of assistance to those studying this genus in the future. The bulk of Le Moult's very extensive Lepidoptera collection which remained after his death was disposed by auction in some 1100 lots, on 5th-7th February 1968, by Mes. Hoebanx and Lemaire at the Hotel Drouot, Paris (sale catalogue, Hoebanx & Lemaire, 1967). The greater part of Le Moult's Prepona types were still in his collection at that time and were included in lots 405-500. Most of the types in this sale material of Prepona are now housed in the British Museum 1- (Natural History).
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Diversity: the Importance of Species Similarity
    Measuring diversity: the importance of species similarity Tom Leinster1,2,∗ Christina A. Cobbold1,2 1School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, UK 2Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, University of Glasgow, UK ∗Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] 1 Abstract Realistic measures of biodiversity should reflect not only the relative abundances of species, but also the differences between them. We present a natural family of diversity measures taking both factors into account. This is not just another addition to the already long list of diversity indices: instead, a single formula subsumes many of the most popular indices, including Shannon’s, Simpson’s, species richness, and Rao’s quadratic entropy. These popular indices can then be used and understood in a unified way, and the relationships between them are made plain. The new measures are, moreover, effective numbers, so that percentage changes and ratio comparisons of diversity value are meaningful. We advocate the use of diversity profiles, which provide a faithful graphical representation of the shape of a community; they show how the perceived diversity changes as the emphasis shifts from rare to common species. Communities can usefully be compared by comparing their diversity profiles. We show by example that this is a far more subtle method than any relying on a single statistic. Some ecologists view diversity indices with suspicion, questioning whether they are biologically meaningful. By dropping the naive assumption that distinct species have nothing in common, working with effective numbers, and using diversity profiles, we arrive at a system of diversity measurement that should lay much of this suspicion to rest.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventaire Entomologique Des ZNIEFF De Martinique Et De La Réserve De La Caravelle
    Inventaire entomologique des ZNIEFF de Martinique et de la Réserve de la Caravelle Campagne de terrain 2014 TOUROULT Julien, POIRIER Eddy, BRAUD Julie, DEKNUYDT Francis, DUMBARDON-MARTIAL Eddy, MOULIN Nicolas, RAMAGE Thibault & ROMÉ Daniel Rapport SEAG 2015-1 Maître d'ouvrage : Touroult et al. 2015. Inventaire entomologique des ZNIEFF de Martinique. Rapport SEAG Résumé Dans la poursuite des inventaires menés depuis 2011, l'entomofaune de six sites situés dans le secteur de la Presqu'île de la Caravelle ont été échantillonnés en 2014. Il s'agit de cinq zones naturelles d'intérêt écologique, faunistique et floristique (ZNIEFF) et de la réserve naturelle de la Caravelle. Des techniques de collecte variées (pièges d'interception, piège lumineux, pièges aériens, recherche active et mise en émergence) ont été utilisées durant une mission de terrain de 20 jours en mai 2014 et complétées par une phase de terrain en septembre comprenant des techniques complémentaires (piège Malaise et assiettes jaunes en particulier). Au total 7 900 spécimens pour 380 espèces ont été déterminés par un ensemble de 27 spécialistes. Géographiquement proches, l'ensemble de ces sites possède un fonds de faune assez homogène, composé d'espèces de forêts sèches et d'espèces ubiquistes. Les analyses se sont appuyées sur la liste des insectes déterminants de ZNIEFF en Martinique, des espèces à la fois bien connues, endémiques et généralement localisées. La réserve de la Caravelle et la ZNIEFF 12 de Bois Pothau apparaissent comme les 2 sites les plus intéressants au regard de ces espèces déterminantes. La ZNIEFF 02 (Morne Régale, Pointe Batterie) s'est également révélée riche en espèces dont de nombreux endémiques.
    [Show full text]
  • In Coonoor Forest Area from Nilgiri District Tamil Nadu, India
    International Journal of Scientific Research in ___________________________ Research Paper . Biological Sciences Vol.7, Issue.3, pp.52-61, June (2020) E-ISSN: 2347-7520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26438/ijsrbs/v7i3.5261 Preliminary study of moth (Insecta: Lepidoptera) in Coonoor forest area from Nilgiri District Tamil Nadu, India N. Moinudheen1*, Kuppusamy Sivasankaran2 1Defense Service Staff College Wellington, Coonoor, Nilgiri District, Tamil Nadu-643231 2Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College, Chennai-600 034 Corresponding Author: [email protected], Tel.: +91-6380487062 Available online at: www.isroset.org Received: 27/Apr/2020, Accepted: 06/June/ 2020, Online: 30/June/2020 Abstract: This present study was conducted at Coonoor Forestdale area during the year 2018-2019. Through this study, a total of 212 species was observed from the study area which represented 212 species from 29 families. Most of the moth species were abundance in July to August. Moths are the most vulnerable organism, with slight environmental changes. Erebidae, Crambidae and Geometridae are the most abundant families throughout the year. The Coonoor Forestdale area was showed a number of new records and seems to supporting an interesting the monotypic moth species have been recorded. This preliminary study is useful for the periodic study of moths. Keywords: Moth, Environment, Nilgiri, Coonoor I. INTRODUCTION higher altitude [9]. Thenocturnal birds, reptiles, small mammals and rodents are important predator of moths. The Western Ghats is having a rich flora, fauna wealthy The moths are consider as a biological indicator of and one of the important biodiversity hotspot area. The environmental quality[12]. In this presentstudy moths were Western Ghats southern part is called NBR (Nilgiri collected and documented from different families at Biosphere Reserve) in the three states of Tamil Nadu, Coonoor forest area in the Nilgiri District.
    [Show full text]
  • Mariposas De La Reserva Silvestre Privada Montibelli. 173
    ISSN 1021-0296 REVISTA NICARAGUENSE DE ENTOMOLOGIA N° 133. _ ____ ___ __ Septiembre 2017 Mariposas de la Reserva Silvestre Privada Montibelli. Por Kevin Gauthier & Jean-Michel Maes. PUBLICACIÓN DEL MUSEO ENTOMOLÓGICO ASOCIACIÓN NICARAGÜENSE DE ENTOMOLOGÍA LEON - - - NICARAGUA Revista Nicaragüense de Entomología. Número 133. 2017. La Revista Nicaragüense de Entomología (ISSN 1021-0296) es una publicación reconocida en la Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal (Red ALyC) e indexada en los índices: Zoological Record, Entomological Abstracts, Life Sciences Collections, Review of Medical and Veterinary Entomology and Review of Agricultural Entomology. Los artículos de esta publicación están reportados en las Páginas de Contenido de CATIE, Costa Rica y en las Páginas de Contenido de CIAT, Colombia. Todos los artículos que en ella se publican son sometidos a un sistema de doble arbitraje por especialistas en el tema. The Revista Nicaragüense de Entomología (ISSN 1021-0296) is a journal listed in the Latin-American Index of Scientific Journals. It is indexed in: Zoological Records, Entomological, Life Sciences Collections, Review of Medical and Veterinary Entomology and Review of Agricultural Entomology. And reported in CATIE, Costa Rica and CIAT, Colombia. Two independent specialists referee all published papers. Consejo Editorial Jean Michel Maes Fernando Hernández-Baz Editor General Editor Asociado Museo Entomológico Universidad Veracruzana Nicaragua México José Clavijo Albertos Silvia A. Mazzucconi Universidad Central de Universidad de Buenos Aires Venezuela Argentina Weston Opitz Don Windsor Kansas Wesleyan University Smithsonian Tropical Research United States of America Institute, Panama Miguel Ángel Morón Ríos Jack Schuster Instituto de Ecología, A.C.
    [Show full text]
  • PHES12 343-403.Pdf
    343 Insects Associated with Orchids By O. H. SWEZEY Consulting Entomologist Experiment Station, H.S.P.A., Honolulu CONTENTS PAGE PAGE Introduction --- ••— 344 Heteroptera " - ----- 367 Coleoptera apparently attached Miridae (Plant bugs attached- . to orchids) 367 to orchids Curculionidae :: 345 Miscellaneous bugs intercepted Orchid weevils in Hawaii.... 345 on orchids 368 Orchid weevils known else Cydnidae 368 where than in Hawaii 349 Pentatomidae 3t>9 Scolytidae 352 Coreidae 369 Mordellistenidae 3W Lygaeidae - --- 370 Cerambycidae 354 Pyrrhocondae o/i Hispidae 354 Tingitidae 371 Chrysomelidae 355 - Aradidae : 3J2 List of Intercepted beetles 355 Miridae - -372 Chrysomelidae 355 Homoptera *. *'* Tenebrionidae 356 Aphididae - 372 Aleurodidae' .: * 3/6 Cucujidae - - - 357 Psyllidae 374 Trixagidae - M ' Lampyridae &» Membracidae - ^ Elateridae - - ^/ Coccidae r -;—- 3/4 List of scale insects for which Dermestidae 358 Lyctidae 358 orchids are the sole or Colidiidae 358 chief food plant 374 Anthribidae 358 List of scale insects having diverse food plants, in Hydrophilidae —• 358 cluding orchids -- 382 Scaphydiidae 358 Ptinidae 358 Orthoptera - -- 390 Melandryidae ^° Tettigoniidae ^ Coccinellidae - 358 Locustidae 392 Scarabaeidae ......— - 359 Gryllidae '- : 392 Endomychidae -• 359 Phasmidae I - 392 Scolytidae 359 Dermaptera - 392 Hymenoptera • 359 Roaches - —- 393 Eurytomidae - 6^/ Thysanoptera 393 Xylocopidae 360 Thrips described from orchids.. 393 Formicidae - ^ Thrips incidentally on orchids Lepidoptera - 362 or intercepted on imported Lycaenidae &£ orchids - 395 Castniidae • 362 Embioptera - - 396 Geometridae 364 Limacodidae ^4 Isoptera 397 Lithosiadae 364 Collembola - - 397 Liparidae 365 Insects which pollinate orchids.. 397 Plusiadae ; 365 Butterflies 398 Psychidae - 3o5 Moths 398 Pyralidae - 365 Bees 399 Tortricidae ^ Stinging ants y\ Cosmopterygidae 366 Wasps - ■■■■■ 401 Acrolophidae Flies ■ ■ 401 366 Diptera Diptera (undetermined) 402 Cecidomyiidae 366 Beetles - - 402 Tephritidae - 367 Thrips 402 Anthomyiidae 60/ Proc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Microlepidoptera Section 1 Limacodidae Through Cossidae
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Technical Bulletins Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station 8-1-1983 TB109: A List of the Lepidoptera of Maine--Part 2: The icrM olepidoptera Section 1 Limacodidae Through Cossidae Auburn E. Brower Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/aes_techbulletin Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Brower, A.E. 1983. A list of the Lepidoptera of Maine--Part 2: The icrM olepidoptera Section 1 Limacodidae through Cossidae. Maine Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 109. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Technical Bulletins by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA OF MAINE Part 2 THE MICROLEPIDOPTERA Section I LIMACODIDAE THROUGH COSSIDAE Auburn E. Brower A JOINT PUBLICATION OF THE MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Maine Forest Service Division of Entomology, Augusta, Maine and the DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY. ORONO Maine Agricultural Experiment Station August 198! Representatives of the Diverse Groups of Included Microlepidoptera 1 Slug moth 2 Pyralid moth 3 Argyrid moth 4 Plume moth 5 Bell moth 6 Cosmopterygid moth 7 Gelechiid moth 8 Ethmiid moth 9 Gracilariid moth 10 Glyphipterygid moth 11 Aegeriid moth Inquiries regarding this bulletin may be sent to: Dr. Auburn E. Brower 8 Hospital Street Augusta, Maine 04330 A LIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA OF MAINE Part 2 THE MICROLEPIDOPTERA Section I LIMACODIDAE THROUGH COSSIDAE Auburn E. Brower A JOINT PUBLICATION OF THE MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Maine Forest Service Division of Entomology, Augusta, Maine and the DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY.
    [Show full text]