DOCSLIB.ORG

WRM/WBS-2020-08 Nile Basin Wetlands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WRM/WBS-2020-08 Nile Basin Wetlands NBI Technical Reports: Wetlands and Biodiversity Series Nile Basin Wetlands TEEB Synthesis Report WRM /WBS-2020-08 Document Sheet This Technical Report series publishes results of work that has been commissioned by the member states through the three NBI Centers (Secretariat based in Entebbe- Uganda, the Eastern Nile Technical Regional Office based in Addis Ababa - Ethiopia and the Nile Equatorial Lakes Subsidiary Action Program Coordination Unit based in Kigali - Rwanda. The content there-in has been reviewed and validated by the Member States through the Technical Advisory Committee and/or regional expert working groups appointed by the respective Technical Advisory Committees. The purpose of the technical report series is to support informed stakeholder dialogue and decision making in order to achieve sustainable socio-economic development through equitable utilization of, and benefit from, the shared Nile Basin water resources. Document Citation NBI Technical Reports- WRM /WBS -2020 - 08 Nile Basin Wetlands TEEB Synthesis Report Title Nile Basin Wetlands TEEB Synthesis Report Series Wetlands and Biodiversity Series 2020-08 Number Responsible and Review Responsible Nile-Secretariat NBI Center Responsible Dr. Abdulkarim Seid and Mr. Leonard Akwany NBI Document Nile Basin Initiative Wetlands Task Team and Lead Consultants (November 2020) Review Process Final Nile Basin Initiative Wetlands Task Team and Lead Consultants (November 2020) Version endorsed Author / Consultant Consultant Individual Consultants Firm Authors Dawit W. Mulatu (PhD) and Jemal A. Tadesse (PhD) Project Funding German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety Source (BMU) Project Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Ecosystem Services of Name Wetlands of Transboundary Relevance in the Nile Basin Project Please confirm this Number Disclaimer The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of NBI’s Member States or its development partners. Trademark names and symbols are used in an editorial fashion and no intention of infringement on trade mark or copyright laws. While every care has been exercised in compiling and publishing the information and data contained in this document, the NBI regrets any errors or omissions that may have been unwittingly made in this publication. The NBI is not an authority on International Administrative Boundaries. All country boundaries used in this publication are based on FAO Global Administrative Unit Layers (GAUL). ©Copyright Nile Basin Initiative Executive summary This document is a synthesis report of the Nile basin ecosystem services valuation were identified, wetland TEEB. “TEEB” stands for The Economics of covering all of the riparian countries. More than two Ecosystems and Biodiversity: a global initiative thirds refer to water-based ecosystems, including seeking to mainstream the value of biodiversity and freshwater wetlands, coastal and marine systems, ecosystem services into decision-making at all levels. and watersheds. The Nile Basin Wetlands TEEB study is coordinated by the Nile Basin Initiative (NBI. Yet, although incorporating a wide range of wetland types, the geographical distribution of the studies is The report seeks to bring wetland ecosystem patchy. The vast majority refer to Kenya, Tanzania services values to the attention of river basin and Uganda. Only a handful of studies have been planners and managers, and to thereby promote carried out in Egypt, Sudan or (especially) Burundi, better-informed, more effective, inclusive, equitable Democratic Republic of Congo, Eritrea and South and sustainable conservation and development Sudan, and very few investigate transboundary, decision-making in the Nile River Basin. regional or multi-country ecosystems. Wetland valuation is also constrained by a lack of biophysical Currently, wetland ecosystem services are data, and limited technical capacity. undervalued in decision-making in the Nile Basin. Not only does this encourage policies and plans that Perhaps most seriously, the decision-making lead to wetland degradation and loss (thereby influence, impact and uptake of ecosystem services causing costs, damages and losses by undermining valuation studies also remains very limited. There is the provision of economically-valuable ecosystem as yet little evidence and few documented examples services), but it also leads to missed economic and of the findings of valuation studies actually being development opportunities (by overlooking the acted on by decision-makers in the agencies, sectors contribution that wetlands make to water-related and industries that depend and impact most on and other ecosystem services). wetland and water ecosystem services. The Nile Basin TEEB synthesis report has two The Nile Basin Wetlands TEEB study was initiated to components. The first component of this report is play a key role in overcoming these information concerned with reviewing the existing knowledge gaps, including expanding the regional coverage and base on wetland ecosystem values, the Nile basin biophysical/socioeconomic evidence base on economies, wetland ecosystems, examples of wetland values and – importantly – providing wetland case studies in the Nile basin, identifying key practical, policy relevant and management-oriented river basin planning and management priorities advice to river basin planning and wetland decision- where valuation could play a key role in guiding or makers. informing decision-making, and thus defining the purpose, focus, approach and methodology of the To these ends, based on an assessment of decision- Nile Basin Wetlands TEEB study. making needs and priorities for Nile River basin planning and guided by the NBI Regional Wetlands The scoping of research and knowledge repositories Expert Working Group, and a regional Expert Panel found that there is already a fairly sizeable and on Ecosystem Valuation convened specifically to growing literature on wetland (and other related) support the TEEB process, the broad architecture for ecosystem values in Nile Basin countries. In excess of the study was developed and presented in the 300 published documents and research articles on following figure. Nile Basin Wetlands TEEB Synthesis Report The goal of the Nile Basin Wetlands TEEB study is to The second component of the TEEB synthesis report strengthen awareness and actions on the economic ‘the main TEEB study’ is based on a series of site- importance of wetland ecosystem services to Nile level economic valuation case studies in priority Nile Basin regional, national, sectoral and local-level Basin wetlands. These seek to assess the socio- development processes in order to facilitate more economic and financial viability, cost-effectiveness effective, equitable and sustainable river basin and return on investment of green infrastructure decision-making. measures for potential stakeholders at the selected sites. The main goal is to support wetland It serves the policy and practical purpose of building conservation measures, management plan and the economic case for wetland conservation and development options to enhance wetland wise use, and has a specific focus on assessing and ecosystem services benefits related to food access, capturing the socio-economic value of wetlands as regulation of micro climate, energy security, social ‘natural’ water infrastructure. The first target and economic values, and sustainable society, audience is river basin planners and water environment and economy. infrastructure investors. The entry point is to demonstrate the socio-economic and development The Nile Basin Wetlands TEEB synthesis report advantages of investing in wetlands. The second consolidate the Nile basin wetland case studies in target audience is wetland conservation planners order to support wetland policy and planning, and and managers. The entry point is to identify point to economic solutions and instruments that can opportunities for improving conservation funding be used to capture wetland ecosystem values in and incentives. support of more effective, equitable and sustainable river basin development, particularly by considering Overall, for both target audiences, the intended area the economic case for wetlands conservation and of decision influence is to help to leverage financing wise use through investments on wetlands and other resources for sustainable wetland management plan as well as assessment of wetlands management. development options. Nile Basin Wetlands TEEB Synthesis Report Key Messages • The wetland areas in the Nile basin are one of the most degraded parts of the Nile, which covers 5% of the basin and vulnerable to various problems, such as infrastructure development close to water resources, conversion to agricultural land, increasing population, overexploitation of wetland resources, expansion of invasive species, extraction of minerals and oil, and climate change. • The Nile Basin wetlands TEEB study seeks to bring wetland ecosystem values to the attention of river basin planners and managers, and to thereby promote better-informed, more effective, inclusive, equitable and sustainable conservation and development decision-making in the Nile River Basin. • The review of literature and knowledge gaps makes it clear that there is a fairly sizeable and growing literature on wetland (and other) ecosystem values in Nile Basin countries. Most of the ecosystem valuation approaches and techniques that are commonly used in other parts of the world are also being applied
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wetlands of the Nile Basin the Many Eco for Their Liveli This Chapt Distribution, Functions and Contribution to Contribution Livelihoods They Provide
    important role particular imp into wetlands budget (Sutch 11 in the Blue N icantly 1110difi Wetlands of the Nile Basin the many eco for their liveli This chapt Distribution, functions and contribution to contribution livelihoods they provide. activities, ane rainfall (i.e. 1 Lisa-Maria Rebelo and Matthew P McCartney climate chan: food securit; currently eX' arc under tb Key messages water resour support • Wetlands occur extensively across the Nile Basin and support the livelihoods ofmillions of related ;;ervi people. Despite their importance, there are big gaps in the knowledge about the current better evalu: status of these ecosystems, and how populations in the Nile use them. A better understand­ systematic I ing is needed on the ecosystem services provided by the difl:erent types of wetlands in the provide. Nile, and how these contribute to local livelihoods. • While many ofthe Nile's wetlands arc inextricably linked to agricultural production systems the basis for making decisions on the extent to which, and how, wetlands can be sustainably used for agriculture is weak. The Nile I: • Due to these infi)fl11atio!1 gaps, the future contribution of wetlands to agriculture is poorly the basin ( understood, and wetlands are otten overlooked in the Nile Basin discourse on water and both the E agriculture. While there is great potential for the further development of agriculture and marsh, fen, fisheries, in particular in the wetlands of Sudan and Ethiopia, at the same time many that is stat wetlands in the basin are threatened by poor management practices and populations. which at \, In order to ensure that the future use of wetlands for agriculture will result in net benefits (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • K&C 13 Wetland Theme Days Summary Laura Hess
    K&C 13 Wetland Theme Days Summary Laura Hess Science Team meeting #13 JAXA TKSC/RESTEC HQ, Tsukuba/Tokyo, January 18-22, 2010 Post-Copenhagen Considerations (What Obama Faces in the U.S. Congress) “If we decrease the use of carbon dioxide, are we not taking away plant food from the atmosphere? . All our good intentions could be for vain.” Rep. John Shimkus (Illinois) “Wouldn’t it be ironic if in the interest of global warming we mandated massive switches to wind energy, which is a finite resource, which slows the winds down, which causes the temperature to go up? . It’s just something to think about.” Rep. Bill Posey (Florida) Source: “Who’s the Biggest FoolScience on the Team Hill?”, meeting Mother #13 Jones magazine, Jan/Feb 2010 JAXA TKSC/RESTEC HQ, Tsukuba/Tokyo, January 18-22, 2010 Mapping and Monitoring of Richard Mangroves and Wetlands Lucas Mangrove structural Mangrove change, 2000-2008, northern Australia types, Belize Science Team meeting #13, JAXA TKSC/RESTEC HQ, Tsukuba/Tokyo, January 18-22, 2010 Mapping Rice Paddies and Agroecological Bill Attributes in Monsoon Asia Salas Poyang Lake Paddy Crop Region, China Area Calendar Science Team meeting #13, JAXA TKSC/RESTEC HQ, Tsukuba/Tokyo, January 18-22, 2010 Wetlands of the Upper Lisa White Nile Rebelo Sudd Marshes Science Team meeting #13, JAXA TKSC/RESTEC HQ, Tsukuba/Tokyo, January 18-22, 2010 Central Amazon Wetlands Laura Inundation Periodicity Hess May 2007 (R) June-July 2007 (G) August 2007 (B) Science Team meeting #13, JAXA TKSC/RESTEC HQ, Tsukuba/Tokyo, January 18-22, 2010 Global Monitoring of Wetland Extent Kyle and Dynamics: Boreal Wetlands McDonald Science Team meeting #13, JAXA TKSC/RESTEC HQ, Tsukuba/Tokyo, January 18-22, 2010 K&C deliverables: Mangroves • A standardized object-orientated method for characterising mangroves and detecting change.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic, Cultural and Ecosystem Values of the Sudd Wetland in South Sudan: an Evolutionary Approach to Environment and Development
    The Economic, Cultural and Ecosystem Values of the Sudd Wetland in South Sudan: An Evolutionary Approach to Environment and Development JOHN GOWDY HANNES LANG Professor of Economics and Professor of Science Research Associate & Technology Studies School of Life Sciences Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Technical University Munich Troy New York, 12180 USA 85354 Freising, Germany [email protected] [email protected] The Economic, Cultural and Ecosystem Values of the Sudd Wetland in South Sudan 1 Contents About the Authors ....................................................................................................................2 Key Findings of this Report .......................................................................................................3 I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 II. The Sudd ............................................................................................................................ 8 III. Human Presence in the Sudd ..............................................................................................10 IV. Development Threats to the Sudd ........................................................................................ 11 V. Value Transfer as a Framework for Developing the Sudd Wetland ......................................... 15 VI. Maintaining the Ecosystem Services of the Sudd: An Evolutionary Approach to Development and the Environment ...........................................26
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of South Sudan
    THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN PRESENTATION ON AICHI BIODIVERSITY TARGET 5 THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN • Population of 11.3 million, 83% rural • Abundant natural resources, but very poor country, largely due to the 50 years of conflict Land cover map of 2011 Percent of land area agriculture 4% trees 33% shrubs 39% herbaceous plants 23% Significant habitats and wildlife populations Example: • Savannah and woodland ecosystems, wetlands (the Sudd) • Biodiversity hot spots: Imatong mountains. • WCS aerial Survey (2007 – 2010) found • 1.2 million white-eared kob and mongalla gazelle • 4000 Elephants and viable populations of other large bodied species. Drivers of loss of natural habitat and wildlife • 1973 – 2006: annual forest loss 2% per year • Underlying drivers of deforestation: demographic, economic, technological, policy, institutional and cultural factors • Biodiversity assets are threatened by escalating commercial poaching linked to population of fire arms, refugees returning, grazing, water scarcity, extractive industries for oil and minerals NATURAL HABITATS; INCLUDING FORESTS IN SOUTH SUDAN: - Low land forest. - Maintenance forest. - Savannah wood land. - Grass land savanna. - Flood plain. - Sudd swamps and other wetlands. - Semi-arid region WCS 2012 TABLE: SOUTH SUDAN NATIONAL HABITATS: HABITATS IMPORTANCE THREATS NEW STEPS Lowland Manual: chimpanzees, • Communities • Assessment forest elephants, forest hug, • Insecurity • Management Bongo, Buffalo and • Illegal • Conservation practices forest monkeys. harvesting • Poaching Mountain Plants: Albizzia, • Farming • Law enforcement forest podocarpus • Hunting • Policies (9,000 km²) Animals: Bush pig, bush • Fire • Institutional framework bug, colobus monkeys, • Illegal logging Rich bird life. Protected area. Savannah Sited in the iron stone • Shifting • Community based wood land plateau. cultivation. management and Elephants, hippos, • Rehabilitation collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Conflicts: the Case of the Nile River Basin
    Environmental Conflicts: The case of the Nile River Basin BY MAHLAKENG KHOSI MAHLAKENG 2007117787 Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Master’s Degree in the Department of Political Science Faculty of Humanities at the University of the Free State. BLOEMFONTEIN JULY 2015 SUPERVISOR: MR. PA SCHOEMAN CO-SUPERVISOR: PROF. H SOLOMON i TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................... V DECLARATIONS ........................................................................................................ V ABSTRACT AND KEY WORDS.…...……………………………………………………VII Key Words………………………………………………………………………………….VII Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………….VIII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................ IX CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1 1.1 Orientation and background ........................................................................... 1 1.2 Problem statement and research question ..................................................... 5 1.3 Aims and objectives of the study .................................................................... 8 1.4 Research methodology .................................................................................. 8 1.5 Literature review ........................................................................................... 10 1.6 Outline of the study .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Scaling up for Impact: Europe Regional Strategy 2015 - 2025
    Scaling up for impact: Europe regional strategy 2015 - 2025 Scaling up for impact: Europe Regional strategy 2015 – 2025 Wetlands International September 2016 Cover photo: Sava river. Photo by Romy Durst. 2 Wetlands International European Regional Strategy 2015 - 2025 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Our vision and mission ............................................................................................................................ 4 Our approach .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Why our work is needed ......................................................................................................................... 5 Our strategy ............................................................................................................................................ 6 How we work in Europe .................................................................................................................. 7 Geographical focus.......................................................................................................................... 8 Our niche and added value ............................................................................................................. 9 Our target groups .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Sudd Marshes Management Tools
    k r o w t e N GIS Based Decision Support Tool g n for Sustainable Development i d l of SUDD Marshes Region i (SUDAN) u B y t i c a p a C n i s a B e l i N GIS Based Decision Support Tool for Sustainable Development of SUDD Marshes Region (SUDAN) “Key knowledge” By Mohamed El Shamy Eman Sayed Mamdouh Anter Ibrahim Babakir Muna El Hag Yasser Elwan Coordinated by Prof. Dr. Karima Attia Nile Research Institute, Egypt Scientific Advisor Prof. Roland K. Price UNESCO-IHE Dr. Zoltan Vekerdy ITC 2010 Produced by the Nile Basin Capacity Building Network (NBCBN-SEC) office Disclaimer The designations employed and presentation of material and findings through the publication don’t imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of NBCBN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city, or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Copies of NBCBN publications can be requested from: NBCBN-SEC Office Hydraulics Research Institute 13621, Delta Barrages, Cairo, Egypt Email: [email protected] Website: www.nbcbn.com Images on the cover page are property of the publisher © NBCBN 2010 Project Title Knowledge Networks for the Nile Basin Using the innovative potential of Knowledge Networks and CoP’s in strengthening human and institutional research capacity in the Nile region. Implementing Leading Institute UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, The Netherlands (UNESCO-IHE) Partner Institutes Ten selected Universities and Ministries of Water Resources from Nile Basin Countries. Project Secretariat Office Hydraulics Research Institute – Cairo - Egypt Beneficiaries Water Sector Professionals and Institutions in the Nile Basin Countries Short Description The idea of establishing a Knowledge Network in the Nile region emerged after encouraging experiences with the first Regional Training Centre on River Engineering in Cairo since 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V
    PRESS RELEASE Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V. Boskalis and Wetlands International to explore the PO Box 43 3350 AA Papendrecht potential of blue carbon The Netherlands Papendrecht, 3 February 2020 Page 1 | 2 Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V. (Boskalis), a global dredging and marine contractor and Wetlands International, the global NGO dedicated to the safeguarding and restoring of wetlands, will intensify collaboration to enhance and restore coastal wetland habitats that not only support coastal protection and fisheries but store some of the world’s largest quantities of carbon. The recently signed agreement will see the organizations first focus on developing the expertise and knowledge of ‘blue carbon’ ecosystems that can contribute to climate targets, adaptation and biodiversity conservation. ‘Blue carbon’ refers to the carbon stored by the world's coastal ecosystems, mostly mangroves, salt marshes and seagrasses. With increasing risks of flooding and erosion, the impacts of climate change on coastal systems and communities are becoming ever more apparent. The dredging sector has a large role to play in safeguarding these areas, providing innovative ways to protect coastlines and introducing adaptive measures. Jane Madgwick, Chief Executive Officer of Wetlands International said: “As natural coastal protection, carbon and water stores, wetlands are vital in helping communities and nature deal with the effects of climate change. Together with Boskalis, we aim to further develop our blue carbon knowledge and expertise to help nature-based approaches become best practice across the maritime and dredging sector.” Theo Baartmans, Board Member and Chief Operating Officer, Boskalis: “As a leader in the industry, Boskalis is keen to further develop nature-based solutions to protect and enrich coastal ecosystems from the consequences of climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Character Description of the Muir-Byenup System Ramsar Site South-West Western Australia
    ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER DESCRIPTION OF THE MUIR-BYENUP SYSTEM RAMSAR SITE SOUTH-WEST WESTERN AUSTRALIA Report Prepared for Department of Environment and Conservation, 2009 CENRM Report: CENRM085 i © Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management, The University of Western Australia TITLE: Ecological Character Description of the Muir- Byenup System Ramsar Site South-west Western Australia: Report prepared for the Department of Environment and Conservation PRODUCED BY: CLAIRE FARRELL AND BARBARA COOK Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management The University of Western Australia Unit 1, Proudlove Parade, Albany, 6332 Telephone: (08) 9842 0839 Fax: (08) 9842 8499 Email: [email protected] PRODUCED FOR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 17 Dick Perry Avenue Technology Park, Western Precinct Kensington WA 6151 CONTACT: MICHAEL COOTE DATE: SEPTEMBER 2009 PUBLICATION DATA: Farrell, C. and Cook, B. 2009. Ecological Character Description of the Muir-Byenup System Ramsar Site South-west Western Australia: Report prepared for the Department of Environment and Conservation, CENRM085. Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management, University of Western Australia. September 2009. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for the development of this document was sourced jointly from the Natural Heritage Trust (NHT) and the State and Commonwealth contributions to the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality (NAP). NHT and NAP are jointly administered by the Australian Government departments of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment on Peatlands, Biodiversity and Climate Change: Main Report
    Assessment on Peatlands, Biodiversity and Climate change Main Report Published By Global Environment Centre, Kuala Lumpur & Wetlands International, Wageningen First Published in Electronic Format in December 2007 This version first published in May 2008 Copyright © 2008 Global Environment Centre & Wetlands International Reproduction of material from the publication for educational and non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior permission from Global Environment Centre or Wetlands International, provided acknowledgement is provided. Reference Parish, F., Sirin, A., Charman, D., Joosten, H., Minayeva , T., Silvius, M. and Stringer, L. (Eds.) 2008. Assessment on Peatlands, Biodiversity and Climate Change: Main Report . Global Environment Centre, Kuala Lumpur and Wetlands International, Wageningen. Reviewer of Executive Summary Dicky Clymo Available from Global Environment Centre 2nd Floor Wisma Hing, 78 Jalan SS2/72, 47300 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia. Tel: +603 7957 2007, Fax: +603 7957 7003. Web: www.gecnet.info ; www.peat-portal.net Email: [email protected] Wetlands International PO Box 471 AL, Wageningen 6700 The Netherlands Tel: +31 317 478861 Fax: +31 317 478850 Web: www.wetlands.org ; www.peatlands.ru ISBN 978-983-43751-0-2 Supported By United Nations Environment Programme/Global Environment Facility (UNEP/GEF) with assistance from the Asia Pacific Network for Global Change Research (APN) Design by Regina Cheah and Andrey Sirin Printed on Cyclus 100% Recycled Paper. Printing on recycled paper helps save our natural
    [Show full text]
  • Locking Carbon in Wetlands for Enhanced Climate Action in Ndcs Acknowledgments Authors: Nureen F
    Locking Carbon in Wetlands for Enhanced Climate Action in NDCs Acknowledgments Authors: Nureen F. Anisha, Alex Mauroner, Gina Lovett, Arthur Neher, Marcel Servos, Tatiana Minayeva, Hans Schutten and Lucilla Minelli Reviewers: James Dalton (IUCN), Hans Joosten (Greifswald Mire Centre), Dianna Kopansky (UNEP), John Matthews (AGWA), Tobias Salathe (Secretariat of the Convention on Wetlands), Eugene Simonov (Rivers Without Boundaries), Nyoman Suryadiputra (Wetlands International), Ingrid Timboe (AGWA) This document is a joint product of the Alliance for Global Water Adaptation (AGWA) and Wetlands International. Special Thanks The report was made possible by support from the Sector Program for Sustainable Water Policy of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) on behalf of the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) of the Federal Republic of Germany. The authors would also like to thank the Greifswald Mire Centre for sharing numerous resources used throughout the report. Suggested Citation Anisha, N.F., Mauroner, A., Lovett, G., Neher, A., Servos, M., Minayeva, T., Schutten, H. & Minelli, L. 2020.Locking Carbon in Wetlands for Enhanced Climate Action in NDCs. Corvallis, Oregon and Wageningen, The Netherlands: Alliance for Global Water Adaptation and Wetlands International. Table of Contents Foreword by Norbert Barthle 4 Foreword by Carola van Rijnsoever 5 Foreword by Martha Rojas Urrego 6 1. A Global Agenda for Climate Mitigation and Adaptation 7 1. 1. Achieving the Goals of the Paris Agreement 7 1.2. An Opportunity to Address Biodiversity and GHG Emissions Targets Simultaneously 8 2. Integrating Wetlands in NDC Commitments 9 2.1. A Time for Action: Wetlands and NDCs 9 2.2. Land Use as a Challenge and Opportunity 10 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Working with Nature
    Mission: Join our efforts In practice: wetlands for disaster risk reduction Working with nature To sustain and Wetlands International is proud to work in collaboration with a wide variety of government, civil Managing wetlands for increased human resilience requires action to sustain or restore water regimes, so as to restore wetlands, society and private sector partners. Together, we are integrating disaster risk reduction methods maintain wetland ecosystem health, productivity and functioning. These actions require the cooperation of different their resources and from the humanitarian, development and environmental sectors. However, there remains a need for Towards integrated approaches to disaster risk reduction sectors and stakeholders at several spatial and temporal scales. biodiversity policies and investments that facilitate widespread adoption of this common sense, holistic approach. Acknowledge the positive or negative impacts on An ecosystem approach to DRR in fi ve steps: the provision of ecosystem services related to the Initiatives aimed at disaster risk reduction must be aligned and combined with other policies in order to Millions of people around the world are Addressing the often complex underlying causes of different scenarios. be effective. Key among these are policies on economic development, land use, water management vulnerable to natural and man-made hazards. risk requires integration of best practices from DRR, 1. Assess risks and vulnerabilities, including the and natural resource exploitation. Unsustainable management and use of climate change adaptation and ecosystem-based (environmental) root causes of risk. ecosystems is often a root cause of such approaches to land and resource management. This Join us and support our work on integrated approaches to disaster risk reduction.
    [Show full text]