DOCSLIB.ORG

Managing Myna Birds (Acridotheres Fuscus and A. Tristis) in the Independent State of Samoa August, 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Managing Myna Birds (Acridotheres Fuscus and A. Tristis) in the Independent State of Samoa August, 2015 Division of Environment and Conservation Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Managing myna birds (Acridotheres fuscus and A. tristis) in the Independent State of Samoa August, 2015 A plan prepared as one of the Management outputs of the GEF PAS project “Prevention, eradication and control of invasive alien species in the Pacific islands", funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF), implemented by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and executed by Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) in partnership with the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MNRE). Prepared by: William G Nagle & Associates Environment, Education, Land Use Approved by: PO Box 15, CLYDE 9341, New Zealand Samoa National Invasive Task Team (SNITT) CONTENTS SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Species description ......................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Significance ................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Status ............................................................................................................................. 4 2. Management Strategies, Goals and Options ...................................................................... 4 2.1 Past Distribution of mynas in Samoa .............................................................................. 4 2.2 Present Distribution of mynas in Samoa ......................................................................... 5 2.3 Population Trends of mynas in Samoa ............................................................................ 6 3. Current management efforts ............................................................................................. 7 4. Issues to consider concerning current management efforts ................................................ 8 5. Long-term goals ............................................................................................................... 9 5.1 Savai`i: eradication of myna species ............................................................................. 10 5.2 Upolu: long-term control .............................................................................................. 10 5.3 Biosecurity ................................................................................................................... 11 6. Options for management ................................................................................................ 11 6.1. Initial knockdown ........................................................................................................ 11 6.2 Follow-up ..................................................................................................................... 11 6.3 Ongoing disruption of myna behaviour ......................................................................... 11 7. Monitoring ..................................................................................................................... 13 8. Objectives and Workplan for 2015-17 ............................................................................ 13 CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................ 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................ 15 ANNEX 1: Myna Management Workshop ANNEX 2: Transect survey, May 2015 SUMMARY This document builds on lessons learned from 10 years of DEC-MNRE action on the myna issue, training workshops on invasive species management, a 2015 myna population transect survey (conservative estimate of total population in Samoa between 129,407 and 188,583 birds), appropriate literature and experiences in Pacific and other countries. Recommendations are made on strategies and the priority information needed to implement those strategies. Reducing the threat to the people and biodiversity of Malo Sa'oloto Tuto'atasi o Sāmoa from an ever-increasing population of myna (also mynah) birds (Maina fanua - Jungle myna (Acridotheres fuscus) and Maina vao – Common (also Indian) myna (Acridotheres tristis) will require implementation of all three strategies of invasive species management; prevention, eradication, control. The success of these strategies will depend on the collection of essential information, the allocation of sufficient resources, the application of a range of treatment methods and the active participation of village communities. At least 1,775 to 2,580 mynas will need to be removed every week for one year just to stop the population increasing from current numbers. Currently, the control method is application of toxic bait (DRC-1339 on buttered bread) along roadsides in response to villagers’ complaints about mynas. This is not proving successful in reducing the myna population and may result in tolerance or resistance to the toxicant. It is also a danger to non-target species which feed alongside mynas. For the future, eradication is the strategy that should be chosen for both the common myna and jungle myna on Savai`i. The myna population there (19,214 – 38,716 birds) is lower than on Upolu, the birds are still dispersing, the human population is low and communities want to be actively involved. Jungle mynas are the most common of the two species and they seem to be easier to trap. A period of pre-feeding followed by toxic baiting will achieve initial knockdown. Reducing habitat suitability, reducing available food sources, nest and egg identification and destruction, roost site identification and disruption, trapping and shooting can be used to complete the project. Further work is required on trapping methods; especially use of large walk-in traps. Adequate resourcing and logistical support will be essential for this effort as will the ability to carry out operations on both public and private property. To reduce costs and facilitate logistics, training for the eradication tasks could take place at a selected village on Upolu where a community wants to be actively involved. Reinvasion from Upolu to Savai`i can be addressed by effective biosecurity. Measures will be necessary to prevent mynas leaving from Upolu on any form of public or private transport and landing on Savai`i and to ensure mynas do not use the motu of Manono, Apolima and Nu'ulopa in the Apolima Strait as resting areas in any flight from Upolu to Savai`i. Ongoing control measures at the western end of Upolu, and the port areas in particular, will be necessary to keep myna numbers down and reduce the pressure to leave for new territory. Myna Management Plan, August 2015 1 The transect survey in May 2015 provided a combined estimate for Upolu of between 110,193 and 149,867 birds of both common myna and jungle myna, a very formidable number. Jungle myna is by far the most numerous of the two myna species on Upolu, 90,390 to 119,530, compared to 15,755 to 30,979 common myna. Upolu has about four times as many mynas as Savai`i and they are more widely dispersed, as is the human population which is about three times greater than Savai`i. A long-term control operation may succeed in reducing the myna population if more birds can be culled than are fledged each year. But there are no reliable data on which to base an estimate of the rate of population increase of each myna species in Samoa and to use in calculating a culling rate. Very little is certain knowledge in this project. Apart from lack of breeding and roosting information, insufficient rigorous work has been done on the interaction between common myna and jungle myna; although anecdotes abound. Jungle myna is reputed to always be first to take bait and to enter traps, while common mynas observe the outcome before taking any action. A reduction in numbers of jungle mynas may result in an increase in the common myna population as they take over jungle myna habitat. It is concluded that eradicating mynas on Savai`i and undertaking long-term control of mynas on Upolu are strategies for managing these invasive birds in Samoa. The resources required for these projects will be significant in both monetary and labour terms. Careful planning and attention to detail will lead to successful projects, but only if the village and communities of Samoa are actively involved in the work. The next steps will involve finalising a long-term workplan to fill in as many information gaps as possible, developing an operational plan for the work on Savai`i and Upolu and seeking funding for those operations. Myna Management Plan, August 2015 2 1. Introduction Myna (also Mynah) birds (Acridotheres spp., Sturnidae (Starling family)) have been targeted for management in Malo Sa'oloto Tuto'atasi o Sāmoa since 2004. They were recognised as a problem on oceanic islands about 250 years ago1 and have become a nuisance at best and a serious pest at worst in several Pacific Island Countries and Territories2. The Government of Samoa has expressed the desire to remove myna birds from the country and has provided money to work towards that goal. The Global Environment Facility Pacific Alliance for Sustainability (GEF-PAS) Invasive Alien Species project funded by the United Nations Environment Program and executed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Manuscript Title
    J. Trop. Resour. Sustain. Sci. 5 (2017): 113-116 Bird Transect Survey at Kampung Baung Bayam: A Potential Ecotourism Attraction at Homestays in Kelantan, Malaysia Fong Pooi Har1, Jayaraj Vijaya Kumaran2,* 1School of Biological Science, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia 2Faculty of Earth Science, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Kelantan, Malaysia Received 10 April 2017 Abstract Accepted 24 July 2017 A direct observation survey of birds on a 2 km transect carried out in Kampung Baung Bayam, Online 30 November 2017 Kelantan revealed at least 20 species of birds. Yellow-vented Bulbul (Pycnonotus goiavier), Zebra Dove (Geopelia striata), Jungle Myna (Acridotheres fuscus), Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis) Keywords: and White-throat Kingfisher (Halcyon smyrnensis) were commonly spotted during this study. A birds, IUCN, Kelantan. check on the conservation status in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species indicates that there is a need to add more data on avifauna in this area for conservation planning and management. ⌧*Corresponding author: © 2017 UMK Publisher. All rights reserved. Dr. Jayaraj Vijaya Kumaran, Faculty of Earth Science, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Kelantan, Malaysia. Email: [email protected] 1. Introduction there is a lack of local tour companies that provide such Birds are fascinating organisms and the diversity service as well as tour trips in their programs (MNS, 2008). of birds in South East Asia is quite remarkable with The potential of such activity in homestay programs in approximately 1327 species of birds (Robson, 2008). Their Malaysia especially in Kelantan has yet to be explored, as habitat varies from areas with zero to minimal human most homestay programs generally offer cultural aspects of activities, rural settlements up to modified urban Malaysian rural folks.
    [Show full text]
  • A Complete Species-Level Molecular Phylogeny For
    Author's personal copy Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 47 (2008) 251–260 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A complete species-level molecular phylogeny for the ‘‘Eurasian” starlings (Sturnidae: Sturnus, Acridotheres, and allies): Recent diversification in a highly social and dispersive avian group Irby J. Lovette a,*, Brynn V. McCleery a, Amanda L. Talaba a, Dustin R. Rubenstein a,b,c a Fuller Evolutionary Biology Program, Laboratory of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14950, USA b Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA c Department of Integrative Biology and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA Received 2 August 2007; revised 17 January 2008; accepted 22 January 2008 Available online 31 January 2008 Abstract We generated the first complete phylogeny of extant taxa in a well-defined clade of 26 starling species that is collectively distributed across Eurasia, and which has one species endemic to sub-Saharan Africa. Two species in this group—the European starling Sturnus vulgaris and the common Myna Acridotheres tristis—now occur on continents and islands around the world following human-mediated introductions, and the entire clade is generally notable for being highly social and dispersive, as most of its species breed colonially or move in large flocks as they track ephemeral insect or plant resources, and for associating with humans in urban or agricultural land- scapes. Our reconstructions were based on substantial mtDNA (4 kb) and nuclear intron (4 loci, 3 kb total) sequences from 16 species, augmented by mtDNA NDII gene sequences (1 kb) for the remaining 10 taxa for which DNAs were available only from museum skin samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Acridotheres Tristis Linnaeus, 1766 the Common Myna (Acridotheres Tristis) Is a Highly Commensal Passerine That Lives in Close Association with Humans
    Acridotheres tristis Linnaeus, 1766 The common myna (Acridotheres tristis) is a highly commensal Passerine that lives in close association with humans. It competes with small mammals and birds for nesting hollows and on some islands, such as Hawaii and Fiji, it preys on other birds’ eggs and chicks. It presents a threat to indigenous biota, particularly parrots and other birdlife, in Australia and elsewhere. The common myna has been introduced to parts of South East Asia, New Zealand, eastern Australia and southern Africa and Madagascar. It is also present on many islands in the Atlantic Ocean (including the Canary Islands, St Helena and Ascension Island), Indian Ocean (including Réunion, Mauritius, Rodriguez north to Lacadive and Maldive Islands and east to Andaman and Solomon Islands, Samoa, Cook Islands, Society Islands and some otherNicobar French Islands) Polynesian and Pacific islands). Ocean There (including are new Fiji, recordsNew Caledonia, of both the common myna and the jungle myna (Acridotheres fuscus) on tropical islands, most recently on Kiribati. Photo credit: K.W Bridges [link] Besides destroying fruit crops and being a public nuisance (they are highly vocal birds), the common myna is a nest site competitor. A Risk assessment model by the Bureau of Rural Sciences, Australia, On the Comoros, mynas are known to compete for nest holes with the ‘Critically Endangered (CR)’ Anjouan Scops Owl (Otus 2003). Foraging traps are very useful for the control of small myna capnodes) and the Grand Comoro Scops owl (Otus pauliani). On populationsclassifies the ifcommon poisoning myna is notin the an highest option. threat Starlacide category DRC1339 (Bomford has Saint Helena, cats and the common myna are probably the most been used against mynas and is effective where there are no non- target species issues.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Tell the Difference Between Noisy Miners and Indian Mynas
    HOW TO TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NOISY MINERS AND INDIAN MYNAS A lot of people want to know how to tell a noisy miner from an Indian myna. The Indian myna (also known as the common myna, common mynah or Indian mynah) has earned the reputation of being one of the worst feral animals in Australia. It’s likely that if you live in Sydney, Melbourne, North Queensland or Brisbane, you’re already familiar with it. This little brown bird might look harmless, but the World Conservation Union (IUCN) takes it very seriously. They put it on the list of the 100 most invasive species in the world and describe it as an extreme threat to Australia. Humans don’t get off easily either. Mynas carry bird mites and have the potential to carry avian-borne diseases that are dangerous to people, not to Noisy miner mention the huge amount of droppings they leave under their communal probably take the role of being the other birds to get the best nesting holes. roosting trees. Often gathering at night worst introduced species in Australia). in numbers more than a thousand, In the 1880s there was a locust You can discourage Indian mynas from these raucous birds can take over plague, so Indian mynas were brought your Australian garden by: clumps of trees, especially around in to control them. Of course, the • keeping less open grassed areas in areas where many people go (where mynas didn’t stop the locusts but your garden; they encounter fewer predators), such became another pest themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Myna Matters - Notes on Introduced Passerines in Western Samoa
    SHORT NOTE More myna matters - notes on introduced passerines in Western Samoa We visited Western Samoa at the following times: 26 July to 15 August 1991 (BJG), 9 August to 21 September 1991 (JRH and TGL) and 2 1 March to 4 April 1992 (TGL). Among the abundant Jungle Mynas (Acrrdotheresfuscus) in Apia we saw a few Common Mynas (A. tristis), as had Beichle (1989), and we made some counts of the relative abundance of the two species. During our visits we travelled along all the main roads of both islands. We mapped the sites at which we saw Jungle Mynas and Red-vented Bulbuls (Pycnonotus cafer), as a bench-mark for future observations. A review of previous records of mynas in Western Samoa has disclosed a report (Green 1965) that establishes an earlier date of introduction than was noted by Beichle (1989). Jungle Myna Mynas were first reported in Western Samoa by Green (1965) as "Introduced Mynah Acridotheres tristis?", and Dhondt (1976) as A. tristis. However, these birds were almost certainly Jungle Mynas because only Jungle Mynas were seen by Beichle during extensive field work from 1977 to 1984 (Beichle 1989) and by Watling in January 1978 (Watling 1978b). The increase of the Jungle Myna in Western Samoa may be traced chronologically as follows: July 1957. Not recorded by Keith (1957) who spent three days on 'Upolu. Not mentioned in the review by Ashrnole (1963). May-June 1965. Green (1965) often saw mynas in Apia but not beyond the town area. September 1970. Not recorded by DuPont (1972) and two companions, who made a point of recording species not previously reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Programs and Field Trips
    CONTENTS Welcome from Kathy Martin, NAOC-V Conference Chair ………………………….………………..…...…..………………..….…… 2 Conference Organizers & Committees …………………………………………………………………..…...…………..……………….. 3 - 6 NAOC-V General Information ……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..………….. 6 - 11 Registration & Information .. Council & Business Meetings ……………………………………….……………………..……….………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………..…..……...….. 11 6 Workshops ……………………….………….……...………………………………………………………………………………..………..………... 12 Symposia ………………………………….……...……………………………………………………………………………………………………..... 13 Abstracts – Online login information …………………………..……...………….………………………………………….……..……... 13 Presentation Guidelines for Oral and Poster Presentations …...………...………………………………………...……….…... 14 Instructions for Session Chairs .. 15 Additional Social & Special Events…………… ……………………………..………………….………...………………………...…………………………………………………..…………………………………………………….……….……... 15 Student Travel Awards …………………………………………..………...……………….………………………………..…...………... 18 - 20 Postdoctoral Travel Awardees …………………………………..………...………………………………..……………………….………... 20 Student Presentation Award Information ……………………...………...……………………………………..……………………..... 20 Function Schedule …………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………..…………. 22 – 26 Sunday, 12 August Tuesday, 14 August .. .. .. 22 Wednesday, 15 August– ………………………………...…… ………………………………………… ……………..... Thursday, 16 August ……………………………………….…………..………………………………………………………………… …... 23 Friday, 17 August ………………………………………….…………...………………………………………………………………………..... 24 Saturday,
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationships of the Starlings (Sturnidae: Sturnini) and the Mockingbirds (Sturnidae: Mimini)
    THE RELATIONSHIPS OF THE STARLINGS (STURNIDAE: STURNINI) AND THE MOCKINGBIRDS (STURNIDAE: MIMINI) CHARLESG. SIBLEYAND JON E. AHLQUIST Departmentof Biologyand PeabodyMuseum of Natural History,Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511 USA ABSTRACT.--OldWorld starlingshave been thought to be related to crowsand their allies, to weaverbirds, or to New World troupials. New World mockingbirdsand thrashershave usually been placed near the thrushesand/or wrens. DNA-DNA hybridization data indi- cated that starlingsand mockingbirdsare more closelyrelated to each other than either is to any other living taxon. Some avian systematistsdoubted this conclusion.Therefore, a more extensiveDNA hybridizationstudy was conducted,and a successfulsearch was made for other evidence of the relationshipbetween starlingsand mockingbirds.The resultssup- port our original conclusionthat the two groupsdiverged from a commonancestor in the late Oligoceneor early Miocene, about 23-28 million yearsago, and that their relationship may be expressedin our passerineclassification, based on DNA comparisons,by placing them as sistertribes in the Family Sturnidae,Superfamily Turdoidea, Parvorder Muscicapae, Suborder Passeres.Their next nearest relatives are the members of the Turdidae, including the typical thrushes,erithacine chats,and muscicapineflycatchers. Received 15 March 1983, acceptedI November1983. STARLINGS are confined to the Old World, dine thrushesinclude Turdus,Catharus, Hylocich- mockingbirdsand thrashersto the New World. la, Zootheraand Myadestes.d) Cinclusis
    [Show full text]
  • New Amendment to Lacey Act Aids in Identification Of
    Sater or Barrington - Int. 2879 I FISH AlJDWILDLIFESERVICE For Release JULY 9# 1954 NJ%!MENDMENT TO LACEXACT AIDS IN IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIESPROELBITED FOR IMPORT Aa an added safeguard against the introduction into the United States of aer- tain unwanted species of wild animals and birds, a new amendment to the Laoey Act has been adopted which clarifies the identification of these species, Secretary of the Interior Douglas McKay announced today. Among the provisions of the Lacey Act, passed on May 25, 1900, was one that prohibited the introduction into this country of certain species of wild animals and birds which might be detrimental to agriculture or horticultures In this provision of the a&, some of the species were actually nsmed, Since then, however, difficulty has bean experienced in making definite identifioation of these species because of the auceptance of revisionary work involving generic names, The new amendment, which specifies by scientific nsme those species that are to be excluded [except for certain specified uses and under rigidly controlled condi- tions mbodied in permits issued by the Fish and Wildlife Service), will not only aid persons planning to import oertain birds and animals, but will ease the work of port-of-entry authorit%es. As stated in the original act, prohibited species include: the mongoose (Herpeates a 0 tatu ); the so-called "flying-foxes" or fruit bats (all species of the Genus*T Ptero tiglish Sparrow (wer domestious); the starling (Sturnus vuJ.aar& ; "and such other birds and animals as the Secretary
    [Show full text]
  • Jungle Myna (Acridotheres Fuscus)
    Invasive animal risk assessment Biosecurity Queensland Agriculture Fisheries and Department of Jungle myna Acridotheres fuscus Steve Csurhes First published 2011 Updated 2016 © State of Queensland, 2016. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/ deed.en" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Front cover: Jungle myna Photo: Used with permission, Wikimedia Commons. Invasive animal risk assessment: Jungle myna Acridotheres fuscus 2 Contents Summary 4 Introduction 5 Identity and taxonomy 5 Description and biology 5 Diet 5 Reproduction 5 Preferred habitat and climate 6 Native range and global distribution 6 Current distribution and impact in Queensland 6 History as a pest overseas 7 Use 7 Potential distribution and impact in Queensland 7 References 8 Invasive animal risk assessment: Jungle myna Acridotheres fuscus 3 Summary Acridotheres fuscus (jungle myna) is native to an extensive area of India and parts of southeast Asia. Naturalised populations exist in Singapore, Taiwan, Fiji, Western Samoa and elsewhere. In Fiji, the species occasionally causes significant damage to crops of ground nuts, with crop losses of up to 40% recorded. Within its native range (South India), it is not a well documented pest, but occasionally causes considerable (localised) damage to fruit orchards.
    [Show full text]
  • India: Kaziranga National Park Extension
    INDIA: KAZIRANGA NATIONAL PARK EXTENSION FEBRUARY 22–27, 2019 The true star of this extension was the Indian One-horned Rhinoceros (Photo M. Valkenburg) LEADER: MACHIEL VALKENBURG LIST COMPILED BY: MACHIEL VALKENBURG VICTOR EMANUEL NATURE TOURS, INC. 2525 WALLINGWOOD DRIVE, SUITE 1003 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78746 WWW.VENTBIRD.COM INDIA: KAZIRANGA NATIONAL PARK EXTENSION February 22–27, 2019 By Machiel Valkenburg This wonderful Kaziranga extension was part of our amazing Maharajas’ Express train trip, starting in Mumbai and finishing in Delhi. We flew from Delhi to Guwahati, located in the far northeast of India. A long drive later through the hectic traffic of this enjoyable country, we arrived at our lodge in the evening. (Photo by tour participant Robert Warren) We enjoyed three full days of the wildlife and avifauna spectacles of the famous Kaziranga National Park. This park is one of the last easily accessible places to find the endangered Indian One-horned Rhinoceros together with a healthy population of Asian Elephant and Asiatic Wild Buffalo. We saw plenty individuals of all species; the rhino especially made an impression on all of us. It is such an impressive piece of evolution, a serious armored “tank”! On two mornings we loved the elephant rides provided by the park; on the back of these attractive animals we came very close to the rhinos. The fertile flood plains of the park consist of alluvial silts, exposed sandbars, and riverine flood-formed lakes called Beels. This open habitat is not only good for mammals but definitely a true gem for some great birds. Interesting but common birds included Bar-headed Goose, Red Junglefowl, Woolly-necked Stork, and Lesser Adjutant, while the endangered Greater Adjutant and Black-necked Stork were good hits in the stork section.
    [Show full text]
  • Hand-Raising and Rehabilitation of Mynas
    Hand-raising and rehabilitation of mynas Corina Gardner Hill mynas David Lim Introduction Mynas are average sized (about 22-28 cms) passerine birds which belong to the family of starlings, Sturnidea. The term ‘myna’ is commonly used to refer to starlings in India. Mynas are commonly distributed throughout Southern and Eastern Asia. These birds have duller plumage and are more terrestrial compared to other members of the starling family. 1 Rehabber’s Den © 2012 Hand-raising and rehabilitation of mynas Common myna Acridotheres tristis The common myna is widely distributed throughout India and Asia and has also been introduced to many parts of the world. The species lives in woodlands and near human habitations. They have brown plumage, a black head, throat and breast, while the bill and legs are yellow. They also have a distinctive yellow patch behind the eyes. They are omnivorous birds and will scavenge for just about anything including discarded scraps, insects, seeds, grain and fruit. They roost in large trees and build their nests in walls and rooftops of buildings. Common myna Tris Jungle myna Acridotheres fuscus Jungle mynas are found in and around the Indian subcontinent. They have brownish grey plumage, a tuft of feathers on their heads, white patches on their 2 Rehabber’s Den © 2012 Hand-raising and rehabilitation of mynas primaries and a white tipped tail. They typically live in forests, tea plantations and near paddy fields. They are omnivorous birds and their diet often consists of insects, fruit, seeds and even nectar from flowers. Jungle myna Devna Arora Bank myna Acridotheres ginginianus This species of myna is found primarily in the Indian subcontinent.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Birds, Index, 2000–2009
    WESTERN BIRDS, INDEX, 2000–2009 Volumes 31 (2000), 32 (2001), 33 (2002), 34 (2003), 35 (2004), 36 (2005), 37 (2006), 38 (2007), 39 (2008), and 40 (2009) Compiled by Daniel D. Gibson abeillei, Icterus bullockii—38:99 acadicus, Aegolius acadicus—36:30; 40:98 Accentor, Siberian—31:57; 36:38, 40, 50–51 Accipiter cooperii—31:218; 33:34–50; 34:66, 207; 35:83; 36:259; 37:215–227; 38:133; 39:202 gentilis—35:112; 39:194; 40:78, 128 striatus—32:101, 107; 33:18, 34–50; 34:66; 35:108–113; 36:196; 37:12, 215–227; 38:133; 40:78, 128 Acevedo, Marcos—32:see Arnaud, G. aciculatus, Agelaius phoeniceus—35:229 Acridotheres javanicus—34:123 Acrocephalus schoenobaenus—39:196 actia, Eremophila alpestris—36:228 Actitis hypoleucos—36:49 macularia—32:108, 145–166; 33:69–98, 134–174, 222–240; 34:68 macularius—35:62–70, 77–87, 186, 188, 194–195; 36:207; 37:1–7, 12, 34; 40:81 acuflavidus, Thalasseus sandvicensis—40:231 adastus, Empidonax traillii—32:37; 33:184; 34:125; 35:197; 39:8 Aechmophorus clarkii—34:62, 133–148; 36:144–145; 38:104, 126, 132 occidentalis—34:62, 133–148; 36:144, 145, 180; 37:34; 38:126; 40:58, 75, 132–133 occidentalis/clarkii—34:62 (sp.)—35:126–146 Aegolius acadicus—32:110; 34:72, 149–156; 35:176; 36:30, 303–309; 38:107, 115–116; 40:98 funereus—36:30; 40:98 Aeronautes montivagus—34:207 saxatalis—31:220; 34:73, 186–198, 199–203, 204–208, 209–215, 216–224, 245; 36:218; 37:29, 35, 149–155; 38:82, 134, 261–267 aestiva, Dendroica petechia—40:297 Aethia cristatella—36:29; 37:139–148, 197, 199, 210 psittacula—31:14; 33:1, 14; 34:163; 36:28; 37:95, 139,
    [Show full text]