DOCSLIB.ORG

Late Talkers’ Speech, Language and Communication Needs at Two Years Care Pathway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Late Talkers’ Speech, Language and Communication Needs at Two Years Care Pathway V1, 18.12.14 Pathway Author: Louise Butchart and Liz Jackson, Speech and Language Therapists Families, Young People and Children’s Services ‘Late Talkers’ Speech, Language and Communication Needs at Two Years Care Pathway Point of Contact with 2 year old No Are there any concerns about Instructions: speech, language and The circular boxes will make communication? reference to guidance documents. Click on the Bookmarks tab to the left of the screen and scroll through Yes the list to locate these. Click on the document you need to open it. To move back to the pathway Refer to audiology itself, click on the first item in the list ‘Pathway’ Yes Does the child need specific intervention from Speech and Language Therapy? Safeguarding No UNIVERSAL PLUS Let’s Get Talking (including Home Visits Babbleback and Toddler Talk) Review by staff involved supported by speech and language therapist UNIVERSAL PARTNERSHIP PLUS UNIVERSAL PLUS UNIVERSAL No further concerns Request for speech and language Support/monitoring Advice and signposting to local therapy involvement groups Copyright © 2015 Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust. All rights reserved. Families, Young People and Children’s Services ‘Late Talkers’ Speech, Language and Communication needs at Two Years Care Pathway Guidance Notes The pathway for Speech, Language and Communication needs (SLCN) at 2 years is a tool for all professionals who come into contact with 2 year olds. The pathway helps you to decide which children can be supported by their Health Visiting Team in collaboration with Local Childrens Centre’s and a neighbourhood Speech and Language Therapist and which children require specific intervention from the Speech and Language Therapist. This Universal Plus intervention is part of delivery of the Healthy Child Programme. Children and their families may be supported through ‘Lets Get Talking’ groups, home visits from their Community Nursery Nurse or Childrens Centre team or groups within Leicestershire’s Childrens Centres by Speech and Language Therapists. The pathway contains ‘Guidance Documents’ and other resources/information/links to help you in supporting the child and their family. These can be accessed via the pathway bookmarks. Implementation of this pathway is supported by training and workforce development. ELKLAN training is a 10 week accredited course covering all aspects of Speech, Language and Communication and how to support children with SLCN. This course is being run for Community Nursery Nurses across the City and County three times per year. A one day course for Health Visitors: Communication from the Start, is also being run every 3 months and covers information about the new pathway as well as key messages for parents to help support their children. Copyright © 2015 Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust. All rights reserved. Internet Links Early Interventions http://www.leicspart.nhs.uk/slcn-earlyinterventions Every Child a Talker (ECAT) http://www.leics.gov.uk/index/education/childcare/early_years_service/foundationstage/ecat.htm Talk to your baby http://www.literacytrust.org.uk/talk_to_your_baby Talking point – milestones http://www.talkingpoint.org.uk/en/Parent.aspx ‘Talk Matters’ Video families.leicester.gov.uk/talkmatters ‘Development Matters’ http://www.foundationyears.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Development-Matters-FINAL- PRINT-AMENDED.pdf LPT Discharge Policy http://www.leicspart.nhs.uk/Library/LPTDischargePolicyFYPC.pdf FYPC Health Visiting Standard Operating Guidelines http://www.leicspart.nhs.uk/Library/HVStandardOperatingGuidance2015finalversion1952015.pdf Copyright © 2015 Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust. All rights reserved. Who is it for? All professionals working with children under 5. “Practitioners are a child’s most valuable resource in an Early Years setting” This tool packed full of ideas and activities for practitioners to use to support children’s speech, language and communication development. What is it for? This interactive tool helps you find information and is linked to the EYFS Development matters. It includes simple practical tips to use while playing with children. One practitioner commented: “I used the tip of just naming the objects the child is looking at and playing with. It made a big difference, we realised that although the children knew what to do with the tools they didn’t know what they were called” Benefits? Practitioners can feel confident that they are giving targeted support at the right level for the child. As soon as the child’s communication and language needs are identified then practitioners can give them the help they need straight away. How to use it? Using the tool, you can see what stage a child is at in the areas of attention and listening, understanding, talking and social communication. From here, with a simple click, you can open up ideas and activities to help in any of these areas. 1. Click on ‘Evaluating Early Language Development’ box to identify area of concern 2. Click on area that needs support, eg ‘Listening and Attention’ 3. Click for information and ideas to help and specific activities to support the child at their developmental level. 4. Click for more information when needed: • 2 year pathway • Stammering • Speech sound development • EAL • Ideas to give to parents • Useful websites Healthy Child Programme Pregnancy and the first five years of life DH DH INFORMATION READER BOX InformatIon reaDer BoX PolicyPolicy EstatesEstates HR/WorkforceHR/Workforce Commissioning Commissioning ManagementManagement IM&TIM & T Planning/PerformancePlanning FinanceFinance ClinicalClinical SocialSocial Care/Partnership Working Care/Partnership Working DocumentDocument purpose purpose BestBest Practice Guidance Practice Guidance GatewayGateway reference reference 1279312450 titleTitle HealthyHealthy Child Programme – The two year review Child Programme – Pregnancy and the first five years Author DH author Dr. Sheila Shribman, Kate Billingham Publication date 27 Oct 2009 Publication date 27 October 2009 Target audience PCT CEs, Directors of PH, Directors of Nursing, PCT target audience PCTChairs, Allied Health Professionals, GPs, Directors CEs, NHS Trust CEs, SHACEs, Medical Directors, Directorsof Children’s SSs, Health Visitors and Sure Start of PH, Directors of Nursing, Local Authority CEs,Children Centres Directors of Adult SSs, GPs, Directors of Children’s SSs, Health Visitors and Sure Start Children Centres Circulation list Directors of Children’s SSs, Voluntary Organisations/ Circulation list NDPBs DescriptionDescription HCP This publication sets out the evidence based is the early intervention and prevention public healthcontent and process for the 2 to 2½ yr review and programme that lies at the heart of all universal serviceemphasises preventing obesity, promoting emotional for children and families. This updated version haswellbeing, language and learning development. It also been produced to strengthen delivery in pregnancy andrecommends closer working with Early Years Services the first five years of life. Cross reference National to reduce duplication and ensure a smooth transition Service Framework for Children Young People andbetween health and Early Years settings. Maternity, gateway ref 3779 SupersededCross reference documents Child Healthy Child Programme – the two year review 12450 Health Promotion Programme – Pregnancy and Superseded documents the first five years of life actionAction required required N/A timingTiming N/A N/A ContactContact details details Jennie Kate Billingham Mullins PartnershipsDepartment of Health for Children, Families and Maternity AreaArea G17, Wellington House 212, Wellington House 133–155133–155 Waterloo Road Waterloo Road LondonLondon SE1 8UG SE1 8UG For recipient use www.dh.gov.uk for recipient use © Crown copyright 2009 First published October 2009 Produced by COI for the Department of Health The text of this document may be reproduced without formal permission or charge for personal or in­house use. www.dh.gov.uk/publications &2,'++HDOWK\&KLOG3URJUDPPHLQGG Healthy Child Programme � Pregnancy and the first five years of life Update of Standard One (incorporating Standard Two) of the National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services (2004) Foreword by Dr Sheila Shribman an effective and high-quality preventive programme in childhood is the foundation of a healthy society. this is as true today as ever. for more than 100 years we have provided a preventive health service that has protected and promoted the health of children. as an experienced paediatrician I have watched the Healthy Child Programme (HCP) change and develop over the years as it has adapted to new knowledge, changes in public expectations and changes in the way in which services are delivered. This is a critical moment in the development This update has been written for a number of the HCP. The advances taking place in of reasons. neuroscience and genetics – and our understanding of how early childhood To raise the profile of the HCP and to highlight development can be both promoted and its importance in addressing some of the serious damaged – create an imperative for the HCP problems that we are facing as a society. to begin in early pregnancy. At the same time, the development of Sure Start children’s To set out how the HCP can deliver a universal centres gives us an opportunity to make more preventive service at the same time as focusing of a difference to children – across a wider set on vulnerable babies, children and families. of outcomes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Update on the UK Coalition Government's
    Statewatch Analysis Six months on: An update on the UK coalition government’s commitment to civil liberties Max Rowlands Contents Part I Introduction Part II The proposed measures 1. The Freedom (Great Repeal) Bill 2. Identity cards, the National Identity Register and the ContactPoint database 3. Fingerprinting in schools 4. The Freedom of Information Act 5. The DNA database 6. The right to trial by jury 7. The right to protest 8. Libel laws 9. The misuse of anti-terrorism legislation 10. The regulation of CCTV 11. The retention of communications data 12. The proliferation of unnecessary criminal offences 13. The Human Rights Act Part III What other reforms are needed? 14. The “database state” 15. The Digital Economy Act 16. Anti-social behaviour legislation 17. Anti-terrorism legislation Part IV Conclusion 1 Part I: Introduction Within weeks of its formation in May 2010, the coalition government announced with much fanfare its intention “to restore the rights of individuals in the face of encroaching state power.” An easy victory over Labour’s politically bankrupt National Identity Scheme followed, but since then the government’s approach has been characterised by caution and pragmatism rather than an unerring commitment to liberty. This is largely because there are splits within government on many of the key civil liberties issues that fundamentally define the relationship between citizen and state: how long and under what conditions can the government detain us, to what extent should the state surveil us, and what data on us should it hold? These internal divisions have been compounded by significant pressure from the civil service and security agencies to retain Labour policies that served to empower them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservative Party's Credibility Deficit Updated Tax and Spending
    The Conservative Party’s credibility deficit Updated tax and spending commitments April 2010 2 Contents Page Introduction 5 Summary 7 Methodology 8 Tables 10 Broken promises 13 45,000 new single rooms in the NHS 15 5,000 new prison places 19 Reducing taxes on savings 22 More places for science courses, training and apprenticeships 24 Maternity nurses for all 25 Reinstate the Defence Export Services Organisation (DESO) 28 National Loan Guarantee Scheme 30 Tax cuts 33 Corporation tax and investment allowance changes 35 Freeze council tax for two years 38 Reduce employers’ NICs for some small companies 41 Tax cuts for married couples 43 Inheritance tax cuts 50 Reverse impact of abolition of dividend tax credit 53 Tax reversals 57 Raise National Insurance Contributions thresholds 59 Oppose Broadband levy 61 Oppose cider duty increase 63 Tax increases 65 Non-domicile levy 67 Spending reductions 73 Cut Government “waste” 75 Savings on employment and skills programmes 78 Reduce spending on Building Schools for the Future 83 Reduce eligibility for tax credits 85 Reduce eligibility for Child Trust Funds 88 Reduce government spending on consultants and advertising 90 Reduce “bureaucracy” spending by a third 92 Welfare savings 95 Scrap ContactPoint 98 NHS IT Programme 100 Freeze pay and cap pensions for public sector workers 103 Reduce spending on Sure Start outreach workers 105 3 Scrap some Regional Development Agencies 107 Scrap regional assemblies 109 Scrap identity cards 110 “Cutting the cost of politics” 112 Scrap the Trade Union Modernisation
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Causes.Pdf
    1 September 2015 Genetic causes of childhood apraxia of speech: Case‐based introduction to DNA, inheritance, and clinical management Beate Peter, Ph.D., CCC‐SLP Assistant Professor Dpt. of Speech & Hearing Science Arizona State University Adjunct Assistant Professor AG Dpt. of Communication Sciences & Disorders ATAGCT Saint Louis University T TAGCT Affiliate Assistant Professor Dpt. of Speech & Hearing Sciences University of Washington 1 Disclosure Statement Disclosure Statement Dr. Peter is co‐editor of a textbook on speech development and disorders (B. Peter & A. MacLeod, Eds., 2013), for which she may receive royalty payments. If she shares information about her ongoing research study, this may result in referrals of potential research participants. She has no financial interest or related personal interest of bias in any organization whose products or services are described, reviewed, evaluated or compared in the presentation. 2 Agenda Topic Concepts Why we should care about genetics. Case 1: A sporadic case of CAS who is missing a • Cell, nucleus, chromosomes, genes gene. Introduction to the language of genetics • From genes to proteins • CAS can result when a piece of DNA is deleted or duplicated Case 2: A multigenerational family with CAS • How the FOXP2 gene was discovered and why research in genetics of speech and language disorders is challenging • Pathways from genes to proteins to brain/muscle to speech disorder Case 3: One family's quest for answers • Interprofessional teams, genetic counselors, medical geneticists, research institutes • Early signs of CAS, parent education, early intervention • What about genetic testing? Q&A 3 “Genetic Causes of CAS: Case-Based Introduction to DNA, Inheritance and Clinical Management,” Presented by: Beate Peter, PhD, CCC-SLP, September 29, 2015, Sponsored by: CASANA 2 Why should you care about genetics? 4 If you are a parent of a child with childhood apraxia of speech … 5 When she was in preschool, He doesn’t have any friends.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservative Agenda for Constitutional Reform
    UCL DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE The Constitution Unit Department of Political Science UniversityThe Constitution College London Unit 29–30 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU phone: 020 7679 4977 fax: 020 7679 4978 The Conservative email: [email protected] www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit A genda for Constitutional The Constitution Unit at UCL is the UK’s foremost independent research body on constitutional change. It is part of the UCL School of Public Policy. THE CONSERVATIVE Robert Hazell founded the Constitution Unit in 1995 to do detailed research and planning on constitutional reform in the UK. The Unit has done work on every aspect AGENDA of the UK’s constitutional reform programme: devolution in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the English regions, reform of the House of Lords, electoral reform, R parliamentary reform, the new Supreme Court, the conduct of referendums, freedom eform Prof FOR CONSTITUTIONAL of information, the Human Rights Act. The Unit is the only body in the UK to cover the whole of the constitutional reform agenda. REFORM The Unit conducts academic research on current or future policy issues, often in collaboration with other universities and partners from overseas. We organise regular R programmes of seminars and conferences. We do consultancy work for government obert and other public bodies. We act as special advisers to government departments and H parliamentary committees. We work closely with government, parliament and the azell judiciary. All our work has a sharply practical focus, is concise and clearly written, timely and relevant to policy makers and practitioners. The Unit has always been multi disciplinary, with academic researchers drawn mainly from politics and law.
    [Show full text]
  • Therapy for Speech Sound Disorders.Pdf
    2018 Fall Conference Salem, Oregon Friday, October 12, 2018 Therapy for Speech Sound Disorders: What Works and Why NSOME Don't Work Presented by: Gregory L. Lof, PhD, CCC-SLP, FASHA Educational Consultant Professor Emeritus MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA Theory and Evidence Against the Use of Nonspeech Oral Motor Exercises (NSOME) to Change Speech Sound Productions in Children Gregory L. Lof, PhD, CCC-SLP, FASHA October, 2018 Nonspeech Oral Motor Movements Defined • NSOMs are motor acts performed by various parts of the speech musculature to accomplish specific movement or postural goals that are not sufficient in themselves to have phonetic identity (Kent, 2015). Nonspeech Oral Motor Exercises (NSOME) Defined • Any technique that does not require the child to produce a speech sound but is used to influence the development of speaking abilities (Lof & Watson, 2008). • A collection of nonspeech methods and procedures that claim to influence tongue, lip, and jaw resting postures, increase strength, improve muscle tone, facilitate range of motion, and develop muscle control (Ruscello, 2008). • Oral-motor exercises (OMEs) are nonspeech activities that involve sensory stimulation to or actions of the lips, jaw, tongue, soft palate, larynx, and respiratory muscles which are intended to influence the physiologic underpinnings of the oropharyngeal mechanism and thus improve its functions. They include active muscle exercise, muscle stretching, passive exercise, and sensory stimulation (McCauley, Strand, Lof, et al., 2009). Do SLPs use NSOME? What Kind? • 85% of SLPs in the USA use NSOME to change speech sound productions (Lof & Watson, 2008); 85% of Canadian SLPs use NSOME (Hodge et al., 2005); 79% in Kentucky (Cima et al., 2009); 81% in South Carolina (Lemmon et al., 2010); 46% in Minnesota (Louma & Collins, 2012); 91% in India (Thomas & Kaipa, 2015); 49% in Australia (Rumbach, Rose, & Cheah, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Constructing Children's Identities: Social Work Knowledge And
    Re-Constructing Children’s Identities: Social work knowledge and practice in the assessment of children’s identities. Jane Thomas This thesis is submitted in candidature for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Cardiff School of Social Sciences Cardiff University April 2010 UMI Number: U585453 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U585453 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 DECLARATION This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Signed . f a £ & — ,rrr. ...... (candidate) Date ................................................................................. STATEMENT 1 This thesis is being submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD. Signed 3 — «■——— ~ .....................(candidate) Date ................................. STATEMENT 2 This thesis is the result of my own independent investigations, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged by footnotes giving explicit references. .(candidate)Signed .. .(candidate)Signed Date STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Code Description
    Code Description 0061 Chronic intestinal amebiasis without mention of abscess 0062 Amebic nondysenteric colitis 0063 Amebic liver abscess 0064 Amebic lung abscess 00642 West Nile fever with other neurologic manifestation 00649 West Nile fever with other complications 0065 Amebic brain abscess 0066 Amebic skin ulceration 0068 Amebic infection of other sites 0069 Amebiasis, unspecified 0070 Other protozoal intestinal diseases, balantidiasis (Infection by Balantidium coli) 0071 Other protozoal intestinal diseases, giardiasis 0072 Other protozoal intestinal diseases, coccidiosis 0073 Other protozoal intestinal diseases, trichomoniasis 0074 Other protozoal intestinal diseases, cryptosporidiosis 0075 Other protozoal intestional disease cyclosporiasis 0078 Other specified protozoal intestinal diseases 0079 Unspecified protozoal intestinal disease 01000 Primary tuberculous infection, unspecified 01001 Primary tuberculous infection bacteriological or histological examination not done 01002 Primary tuberculous infection, bacteriological or histological examination results unknown 01003 Primary tuberculous infection, tubercle bacilli found by microscopy 01004 Primary tuberculous infection, tubercle bacilli found by bacterial culture 01005 Primary tuberculous infection, tubercle bacilli confirmed histolgically 01006 Primary tuberculous infection, tubercle bacilli found by other methods 01010 Tuberculous pleurisy in primary progressive tuberculosis unspecified 01011 Tuberculous pleurisy bacteriological or histological examination not done 01012 Tuberculous
    [Show full text]
  • Speech-Language Pathology: Student Clinical Handbook
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY: STUDENT CLINICAL HANDBOOK 1 Table of Contents Page Overview of LSUHSC Graduate Program A. Departmental Mission 4 B. Sources of Information 5 1. LSUHSC Catalogue/Bulletin 5 2. LSUHSC Department of Communication Disorders 5 3. ASHA Certification Handbook 5 4. Speech-Language Pathology Handbook 5 General In-House Clinic Policies A. Timeliness 6 B. Illness 6 C. Dress Code 6 D. Attendance 7 E. Clinical Resources 8 F. Infection Control Procedures 9 G. Clinic Cleanup 10 H. Emergency Procedures 11 1. Medical Emergencies or Accidents 11 2. Fire Procedures 11 I. Confidentiality 12 J. Medical Records 13 Clinic Practicum A. Observations 15 B. Clinic: Treatment 16 1. Client Preparation 16 2. Telephone Contact 16 3. Treatment Room Sign-Up 16 4. First Week of Treatment Session 17 5. Program Planning 17 6. Treatment Documentation: Routing 17 7. Types of Treatment Documentation 18 8. Conferencing 19 9. End of Semester Duties 19 C. Clinic: Diagnostics/Evaluations 20 1. Assignments 20 2. Confirmation Phone Call 20 3. Illness 21 4. Greeting Client 21 5. Client Conference/Counseling 21 6. Concluding the Evaluation 22 7. Filing of Test Forms 22 8. Diagnostic/Evaluation Documentation: Routing 22 9. Diagnostic Protocols 23 10. Case Staffing 23 2 D. Patient Satisfaction Surveys 23 E. Grading Policy for Students in Clinic 24 1. Observations 24 2. Clinical Practicum 24 F. Procedures for Student Experiencing Clinic Difficulty 24 G. Evaluation of Clinical Supervisor 25 H. Recording Clinical Hours 25 Complaints, Comments and Concerns 27 Appendices A. Confirmation Phone Scripts 29 B.
    [Show full text]
  • A Surveillance Society?
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee A Surveillance Society? Fifth Report of Session 2007–08 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 20 May 2008 HC 58-I [Incorporating HC 508-i–iv, Session 2006–07] Published on 8 June 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chairman) Tom Brake MP (Liberal Democrat, Charshalton and Wallington) Ms Karen Buck MP (Labour, Regent’s Park and Kensington North) Mr James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Mrs Ann Cryer MP (Labour, Keighley) David TC Davies MP (Conservative, Monmouth) Mrs Janet Dean MP (Labour, Burton) Patrick Mercer MP (Conservative, Newark) Margaret Moran MP (Labour, Luton South) Gwyn Prosser MP (Labour, Dover) Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Martin Salter MP (Labour, Reading West) Mr Gary Streeter MP (Conservative, South West Devon) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the inquiry: Rt Hon John Denham MP (Labour, Southampton Itchen) Mr Jeremy Browne MP (Liberal Democrat, Taunton) Mr Richard Benyon MP (Conservative, Newbury) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contactpoint Database
    The ContactPoint database Standard Note: SN/SP/5171 Last updated: 25 March 2011 Author: Manjit Gheera Section Social Policy Section ContactPoint, or the Children’s Information Sharing Index, as it was originally called, was introduced by the previous Labour Government following concerns that professionals working with children lacked adequate resources to identify children vulnerable to abuse. Legislation was introduced in 2004 allowing the Secretary of State to require local authorities to establish databases in connection with their duties to safeguard children. Under those provisions, ContactPoint was launched in 2009 as an online directory containing basic information on all children in England and accessible to frontline professionals such as teachers and social workers. Following the 2010 General Election, the Coalition Government made it clear that it intended to scrap ContactPoint in due course. The database was shut down on 6th August 2010. The Government is currently considering the feasibility of replacing ContactPoint with a new signposting service for professionals working with vulnerable children. This note provides background information on the ContactPoint database. This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. It should not be relied upon as being up to date; the law or policies may have changed since it was last updated; and it should not be relied upon as legal or professional advice or as a substitute for it. A suitably qualified professional should be consulted if specific advice or information is required. This information is provided subject to our general terms and conditions which are available online or may be provided on request in hard copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Guide to Assessment and Treatment of Communication Disorders Best Practices in Child and Adolescent Behavioral Health Care
    Best Practices in Child and Adolescent Behavioral Health Care Series Editor: Fred R. Volkmar Patricia A. Prelock Ti any L. Hutchins Clinical Guide to Assessment and Treatment of Communication Disorders Best Practices in Child and Adolescent Behavioral Health Care Series Editor Fred R. Volkmar Yale University New Haven, CT, USA Best Practices in Child and Adolescent Behavioral Health Care series explores a range of topics relevant to primary care providers in managing a broad range of child and adolescent mental health problems. These include specific disorders, such as anxiety; relevant topics in related disciplines, including psychological assessment, communication assessment, and disorders; and such general topics as management of psychiatric emergencies. The series aims to provide primary care providers with leading-edge information that enables best-care management of behavioral health issues in children and adolescents. The volumes published in this series provide concise summaries of the current research base (i.e., what is known), best approaches to diagnosis and assessment, and leading evidence-based management and treatment strategies. The series also provides information and analysis that primary care providers need to understand how to interpret and implement best treatment practices and enable them to interpret and implement recommendations from specialists for children and effectively monitor interventions. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/15955 Patricia A. Prelock • Tiffany L. Hutchins
    [Show full text]
  • Don't Wait-And-See, Research Suggests
    Don’t wait-and-see, research suggests By Lauren Lowry Hanen S-LP and Clinical Staff Writer Historically, intervening with the group of children known as “late talkers” has been the source of some debate within the field of speech language pathology (Hawa & Spanoudis, 2014). Late talkers are children who: Late talkers are children who: • are between 18 – 20 months and have fewer than 10 words; OR • are between 21 - 24 months and have fewer than 25 words; OR • are between 24 – 30 months and have fewer than 50 words and/or no two-word combinations; AND • have no major areas of concern in other areas of development (e.g. understanding, play, social, motor, cognitive skills) (Rescorla, Mirak, & Singh, 2000) While some researchers and professionals have advocated early intervention in order to prevent future difficulties, others have adopted a wait-and-see approach, whereby a child is not referred for intervention, despite failing a language screening (Capone Singleton, 2018). The wait-and-see approach is based on the idea that this group of children is likely to catch up to their peers on their own. However, two recent articles by Capone Singleton (2018) and Hawa et al. (2014) remind us of the body of research which strongly suggests that the wait-and-see approach is outdated, and that an ounce of prevention may be worth a pound of cure when it comes to late talkers. Late talker, late bloomer, language disorder – what’s the difference? It’s important to sort out some terminology before we go any further: • “Late talkers” are children with early language delay despite typical cognition, sensory and motor systems, and the absence of genetic or neurologic disease.
    [Show full text]