DOCSLIB.ORG

Collins Drive Oakland | Ca

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Collins Drive Oakland | Ca 8055 8055 New Sale Price:COLLINS $2,900,000 DRIVE COLLINS DRIVE OAKLAND | CA OFFERING MEMORANDUM CONFIDENTIAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 8055 8055 COLLINS DRIVE I. OFFERING SUMMARY II. PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS COLLINS DRIVE Property Details • Floor Plans III. LOCATION OVERVIEW Aerial • Nearby Amenities BROKER CONTACTS Area Overview • Demographics ALEX PECK, Associate MARKET ANALYSIS [email protected] IV. 925.239.1414 | LIC# 01981426 Industrial Market Trends ZACK BARNES, Principal • Coliseum Development Proposal [email protected] 510.903.7619 | LIC# 01971978 OFFICES NATIONWIDE AND THROUGHOUT CANADA WWW.LEE-ASSOCIATES.COM 1 8055 COLLINS DRIVE 40% 60% 10,512 SF 15,500SF Office Warehouse Building Yard OFFERING SUMMARY Lee & Associates, as exclusive advisor, is pleased to present the opportunity to acquire the fee-simple interest in 8055 Collins Drive (“The Property”), located in the East Bay Area city of Oakland, CA. Located right off the interstate 880 Freeway, the Property offers an exceptionally rare location adjacent to Oracle Arena and the Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum (550 yards away). The Property is truly centrally located in the East Bay with close proximity to every major city in the Bay Area. Located just 6 miles from Downtown Oakland, 15 miles from San Francisco, 20 miles to San Mateo, and 28 miles to San Jose. Built in 1966, this recently remodeled, 10,512 square foot property offers an uncommon opportunity for an owner-user, investor, or developer to acquire a premium property in a developing area. Currently 69% leased to tenants on short term leases, the Property may allow an owner-user to occupy space while earning income, with the flexibility to grow into the remaining space. The Property is located in the Oakland “Green Zone” and can be utilized by cannabis operators or traditional business’s alike. Additionally, an investor may take advantage of a value-add strategy in a central location that has shown rapid economic growth, and superior market fundamentals and leaseThe information rates. contained herein is based on estimates and assumptions and is presented for illustration purposes only. No representations, warranties or guarantees of any kind are made. 2 8055 PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS COLLINS DRIVE Owner-User Investment Month-to-Month Development Potential Potential Tenants Potential Location Flexible Use Property The Property is ideal for multiple different types of uses. Adjacent to Coliseum Having such a diverse portion of warehouse, office, and yard space, The Property is condusive for both a user who can utilize all three, or a use who can lease the remaining portion they don’t need. Green Zone Creative Buildout Flexible Green Zone Uses For both users and investors alike, The Property offers a floor plan that achieves maximum efficiency and value. The first floor office space is build out primarily for one user in mind, but could be subdivided if needed. The second floor office space Recently Remodeled is build out for eight (8) small tenants that pay a premium rent, but can also be configured into a contiguous space for one user. The warehouse space currently has a wall dividing the space Fully Remodeled in 2013 into two, but could be easily taken down to make contiguous. 3 8055 PROPERTY DETAILS COLLINS DRIVE $2,900,000 10,512± $275 LIST PRICE SQUARE FEET PER SQUARE FOOT Net Rentable Area 10,512 APN 42-4328-1-6 Address 8055 Collins Drive, Oakland, CA 94621 Site Area .61 Acres (26,500 SF) Submarket Oakland - Airport Year Built 1966 Year Renovated 2013 Parking 27 Stalls + 3 Handicap (2.85 per 1000 SF) Zoning D-CO-2 Cannabis Zoning All Cannabis Zones Except Type 7 Power 400a/120-240v 1p Doors One (1) Grade Level 4 8055 PROPERTY PHOTOS COLLINS DRIVE 5 8055 FLOOR PLANS COLLINS DRIVE 1ST FLOOR PLAN 8,356± RSF 6 8055 FLOOR PLANS COLLINS DRIVE 2ND FLOOR PLAN 2,156± RSF 7 8055 AERIAL OVERVIEW COLLINS DRIVE 218,000 CARS PER DAY 8055 COLLINS DRIVE 50,000 CARS PER DAY 8 8055 NEARBY AMENITIES COLLINS DRIVE 8055 COLLINS DRIVE 9 8055 AREA OVERVIEW COLLINS DRIVE Major Employers City of Oakland Overview The city of Oakland lies in the Northern California East Bay Area just 4.5 miles east of San Francisco. Oakland is the largest city and the county seat of Alameda County, Califor- nia. A major West Coast city, Oakland is the largest city in the East Bay region of the San Francisco Bay Area, the eighth most populated city in California, and the 45th largest city in the United States. With a population of 432,897 as of 2019, it serves as a trade center for the Bay Area; its port of Oakland is the busiest port in the San Francisco Bay, the entirety of Northern California, and the fifth busiest in the United States. Oakland is currently undergoing a major construction boom, with over 6000 new apart- ment units alone expected to reach the market in the next two years. There are major em- ployers calling Oakland home, and some of the largest employers in Oakland are Kaiser Permanent, Sutter Health, The Clorox Company, Pandora Media Inc., UPS, Southwest Airlines, University of California, Cost Plus, Minted, BART, and UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital Oakland. Oakland has started to become a destination for employers who are trying to find a lower rent ceiling compared to their high prices neighboring city of San Francisco. 10 8055 DEMOGRAPHICS (3 MILES) COLLINS DRIVE 214,034 $519,149 $62,659 POPULATION MEDIAN HOME PRICE MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME 36.7 3.00 4.58 % AVERAGE AGE AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE POP GROWTH (2018-2023) 11 8055 MARKET ANALYSIS COLLINS DRIVE Situated in the East Bay Area in the heart of Alameda County, Oakland is located just 4.5 miles East of San Francisco. The Oakland-Airport Industrial market consists of 374 buildings totaling over 11 million squre feet. Market Existing Rentable SF Vacant SF Vacancy T12 Net Under Asking Rent Buildings Absorption Construction PSF Oakland - Airport 374 11,100,000 274,000 2.5% 83,200 0 $1.11 NNN Alameda 158 6,900,000 719,000 10.5% -271,000 186,000 $1.19 NNN Oakland - South 553 11,800,000 598,000 5% 3,100 0 $1.05 NNN Oakland - West 423 10,800,000 878,000 8.1% -43,500 160,000 $1.19 NNN San Leandro - East 272 6,800,000 180,000 2.6% -169,000 431000 $1.04 NNN Totals 1780 47,400,000 2,649,000 5.8% -397,200 777,000 $1.12 NNN Oakland-Airport Industrial Market Summary The Oakland Airport Submarket, in addition to providing airport access, offers better access to the Port of Oakland than many other East Bay submarkets do. The submarket is along the Union Pacific Railroad and close to many intermodal facilities (such as BNSF Oakland International Gateway) near the Oakland Harbor. Industrial developers built out this part of the East Bay early in the Bay Area’s history, and developable land is now scarce. The most recent significant new inventory added to the submarket is the almost 375,000 SF Goodman Logistics Center, which delivered in Q2, 2014. After significant positive net absorption of both newly constructed and existing space early in the expansion cycle, the submarket’s vacancy rate has dropped to an expansion cycle low under 1% in 2017. Since that time, some tenant move outs have caused the vacancy rate to rise slightly to 2.5%, although this is still well below metro average. The inherent demand in Oakland-Airport, as well as the lack of available space, has allowed rents to grow at an almost double-digit pace annually from 2014 through the end of 2018. Although rent growth slowed recently, to a current year-over-year rate of 7.5%, the submarket’s rent growth remains among the strongest in the metro. Sales volume spiked to over $145 million in 2018, a new record, and due largely to a few assets trading within large institutional portfolio transactions. Pricing continues to rse but average pricing in the submarket still trails the metro average. *Source: CoStar 12 8055 COLISEUM DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL COLLINS DRIVE “The A’s would keep Oracle Arena and turn the Coliseum into “But it’s going to include the really important aspect of a “rooman ruin-like” multi-sports facility, where there would affordable-housing and also market-rate housing - a mix of also be parks, housing, and a technology campus. Celebrity different uses for our community to make sure we architect Bjarke Ingles of Bjarke Ingles Group (BIG) is on board address the housing crisis”. - Dave Kaval, Oakland A’s Team as a designer”. - San Francisco Business Times President 13 8055 COLLINS DRIVE OAKLAND | CA BROKER CONTACTS ALEX PECK, Associate ZACK BARNES, Principal [email protected] [email protected] 925.239.1414 | LIC# 01981426 510.903.7619 | LIC# 01971978 Lee & Associates Oakland Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. | 520 3rd Street, Suite 105 | Oakland, CA 94607 Lee & Associates Walnut Creek Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. | 1407 Oakland Blvd, Suite 103 | Walnut Creek, CA 94596 8055 COLLINS DRIVE OAKLAND | CA CONFIDENTIALITY & DISCLAIMER Lee & Associates. (“L&A”) has been retained on an exclusive basis by the Owners 8055 Collins Drive, Oakland, CA with respect to the offering of the 100% fee simple interest in the above reference property (the “Property”). The Owner has indicated that all inquiries and communications with respect to the contemplated sale of such Properties be directed to L&A. All fees due L&A in connection with the sale of the Property shall be paid by the Owner. Neither L&A nor Owner shall be responsible for paying any fees to agents representing Potential Purchasers unless agreed to in writing in advance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alameda I 680 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan
    Alameda I-680 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 68DB90D3-75C6-4545-BEE4-4EF3E608995F 6-1-2020 6/24/2020 DocuSign Envelope ID: 68DB90D3-75C6-4545-BEE4-4EF3E608995F Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ i Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Caltrans Policy Development .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Senate Bill 1 and the Solutions for Congested Corridors Program ..................................................... 1 1.3 Document Structure............................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Stakeholders ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 2: Corridor Goals, Objectives and Performance Metrics ................................................................ 3 Chapter 3: Corridor Overview ....................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Corridor Limits .................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Route Significance ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gudel V. the Clorox Company
    Case 3:20-cv-05712 Document 1 Filed 08/14/20 Page 1 of 16 1 DANIEL LEVINSON JUSTIN STOCKTON 2 LEVINSON STOCKTON LLP 990 Highland Drive, Suite 206 3 Solana Beach, CA 92075 Telephone: (858) 792-1100 4 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] 5 WILLIAM WRIGHT 6 THE WRIGHT LAW OFFICE, LLP 301 Clematis Street, Suite 3000 7 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Telephone: (561) 514-0904 8 Email: [email protected] (pro hac vice application forthcoming) 9 DANIEL FAHERTY 10 TELFER, FAHERTY, & ANDERSON, PL 815 S. Washington Avenue, Suite 201 11 Titusville, Florida 32780 Telephone: (321) 269-6833 12 Facsimile: (321) 383-9970 Email: [email protected] 13 (pro hac vice application forthcoming) 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class 15 SHANA GUDGEL, on behalf of herself and Case No. 16 all others similarly situated, CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 17 Plaintiff, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 18 v. 19 THE CLOROX COMPANY; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Case 3:20-cv-05712 Document 1 Filed 08/14/20 Page 2 of 16 1 INTRODUCTION 2 1. Plaintiff Shana Gudgel (“Plaintiff”), by and through her undersigned counsel, files this 3 Class Action Complaint against Defendant The Clorox Company and DOES 1 to 10 (collectively, “Clorox” or “Defendant”), individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, 4 and alleges, upon personal knowledge as to her own actions, and upon investigation of counsel as 5 to all other matters, as follows: 6 SUMMARY OF DEFENDANT’S UNLAWFUL CONDUCT 7 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Easybayexperiance00shetrich.Pdf
    u University of California Berkeley REGIONAL ORAL HISTORY OFFICE Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California History of Bay Area Philanthropy Series Robert B. Shetterly EAST BAY EXPERIENCES IN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY With an Introduction by Eugene E. Trefethen, Jr. Interviews Conducted by Gabrielle Morris in 1990 Copyright fc\ 1991 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the Nation. Oral history is a modern research technique involving an interviewee and an informed interviewer in spontaneous conversation. The taped record is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The resulting manuscript is typed in final form, indexed, bound with photographs and illustrative materials, and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ************************************ All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Robert B. Shetterly dated 8 February 1990. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Life Easier, Healthier and Better 13510Clod1r2.Qxd 9/20/05 8:17 PM Page Ifc
    13510cloD1R1.qxd 09/10/2005 6:56 PM Page 1 The Clorox Company 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders and Employees Making Life Easier, Healthier and Better 13510cloD1R2.qxd 9/20/05 8:17 PM Page ifc Net Sales Operating Profit 1 Net Cash Provided by Operations (in millions) (as percent of net sales, on a rounded basis) (in millions) $4,388 $4,162 $876 $899 $3,986 19% 19% 19% $803 $3,859 18% $747 $765 $3,697 16% 01 02 03 04 05 01 02 03 04 05 01 02 03 04 05 $6.11 2 3 Net Earnings $1,096 Diluted Net Earnings Return on Invested Capital (in millions) Per Share2 13.9% 13.9% 13.5% 12.5% 10.3% $2.56 $549 $2.23 $2.88 $493 $2.28 $490 $517 $2.08 $323 $322 $461 $1.35 $1.37 $304 $1.29 $277 $1.16 01 02 03 04 05 01 02 03 04 05 01 02 03 04 05 1. Operating Profit — Gross profit less selling and administrative expenses, advertising costs, and research and development costs. 2. The shaded area represents continuing operations. 3. Return on invested capital is a non-GAAP measure based on after-tax operating profit (excluding restructuring and intangible amortization in cost of goods sold) divided by aver- age total invested capital. See reconciliation of the earnings used in this calculation as set forth in Exhibit 99-3 to the company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005. 13510cloD1R2.qxd 9/23/05 1:48 PM Page 1 Fellow Shareholders and Employees Our company had another good year in fiscal 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E Importance of Goods Movement
    Appendix E Importance of Goods Movement www.camsys.com THE IMPORTANCE AND BENEFITS OF GOODS MOVEMENT FOR ALAMEDA COUNTY, THE BAY AREA, AND THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA MEGAREGION Final White Paper prepared for Alameda County Transportation Commission and Metropolitan Transportation Commission prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. www.camsys.com 1.0 WHAT IS GOODS MOVEMENT? Alameda County at a Glance Goods movement refers to the transportation and A major producer and consumer of logistics processes that are involved in moving goods, Alameda County has: products from raw materials producers to industry to − 21 percent of the region’s consumers – and all the steps in-between. This population; and includes everything from supplies moving to a − 25 percent of the region’s manufacturing facility for processing, to consumer manufacturing employment. goods being delivered to retail outlets. As such, goods movement and the industries that rely on it As a provider of transportation services, Alameda County has: form the backbone of the national, regional, and local economies. Goods movement is worth $626 billion in − 39 percent of the region’s domestic and international trade for the San employment in freight Francisco Bay Area, and provides employment to transportation and warehousing millions in the region in those businesses that rely on industries. or provide goods movement services. The County is home to transportation infrastructure vital to the local, Alameda County enjoys one of the most strategic regional, and national economy, trade locations in the world; and with its connections including: to national and international markets, the County serves as a natural hub for goods movement − The Port of Oakland and Oakland International Airport; throughout the Bay Area and the surrounding Northern California megaregion.
    [Show full text]
  • Clorox Professional Products Mainland
    CLOROX PROFESSIONAL PRODUCTS COMPANY MAINLAND PRICE LIST EFFECTIVE: October 1, 2017 DISINFECTING SPRAY & WIPES GROSS EAN/ CASE CASE CASE STAT CASES/ CASES/ PALLET PRICE UPC UPC PK/SIZE DESCRIPTION WEIGHT CUBE VALUE LAYER PALLET WEIGHT QUAT ALCOHOL CLEANER DISINFECTANT WIPES 10044600313358 31335 12/100ct Clorox Healthcare Quat Alcohol Cleaner Disinfectant Wipes 12/100ct 21.000 1.480 2.67 10 40 840 $76.68 CLOROX 4 IN ONE DISINFECTANT AND SANITIZER 10044600310432 31043 12/14fo Clorox Commercial Solutions Clorox 4 in One Disinfectant & Sanitizer 12/14oz 15.000 0.470 4.00 19 133 1995 $54.72 10044600311323 31132 6/14oz Clorox 4 in One Disinfecting Spray Citrus Scent 6/14oz 6.300 0.230 1.09 39 195 1228.5 $27.36 DISINFECTING SPRAY 10044600385041 38504 12/19oz Clorox Disinfecting Spray Commercial Solutions Fresh Scent 12/19oz 19.900 0.610 4.56 18 72 1432.8 $67.68 DISINFECTING WIPES 10044600159499 15949 6/75ct Clorox Disinfecting Wipes Commercial Solutions Fresh Scent 6/75ct 10.400 0.570 2.25 16 80 832 $37.98 10044600159482 15948 6/75ct Clorox Disinfecting Wipes Commercial Solutions Lemon Fresh 6/75ct 10.400 0.570 2.25 16 80 832 $37.98 10044600315475 31547 1/700ct Clorox Disinfecting Wipes Commercial Solutions Fresh Scent 1/700ct 14.560 0.870 3.50 12 48 698.88 $45.99 10044600314287 31428 2/700ct Clorox Disinfecting Wipes Commercial Solutions Refill Fresh Scent 2/700ct 25.400 0.830 7.00 12 60 1524 $73.92 10044600015948 01594 12/35ct Clorox Disinfecting Wipes Citrus Blend 12/35ct 10.060 0.640 2.10 14 70 704.2 $40.50 10044600016280 01628 6/75ct Clorox
    [Show full text]
  • I-80 East Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan
    I-80 East Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan Caltrans District 4 June 2020 I -8 0 E a s t C omp r e h e n s i v e Mu l t i mo d a l C o r r i d o r P l a n APPROVED BY: I accept this Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan for the I-80 East Corridor as a document informing the regional transportation planning process. ACCEPTED BY: I -8 0 E a s t C omp r e h e n s i v e Mu l t i mo d a l C o r r i d o r P l a n Approval Recommended by: Acknowledgments: Caltrans John McKenzie, Associate Transportation Planner Kyle Pratt, Transportation Planner Brian Johnson, Associate Transportation Planner Solano Transportation Authority Janet Adams, Deputy Executive Director/Director of Projects Robert Guerrero, Director of Planning Brent Rosenwald, Assistant Planner Metropolitan Transportation Commission Lisa Klein, Director, Field Operations and Asset Management Therese Trivedi, Assistant Planning Director Adam Noelting, Principal Planner/Analyst Cover photo by Bill Hall, Caltrans District 4 Photography Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ i Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Caltrans Policy Development .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Senate Bill 1 and the Solutions for Congested Corridors Program ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quality from Henkel Annual Report 2003
    Annual Report 2003 Quality from Henkel Financial Highlights – Henkel Group in million euros 2002 2003 Change Sales 9,656 9,436 – 2.3 % Operating profit (EBIT) 666 706 6.0 % Laundry & Home Care 268 287 7.3 % Cosmetics/Toiletries 184 194 5.4 % Consumer and Craftsmen Adhesives 123 141 14.6 % Henkel Technologies 185 194 4.9 % EBIT margin % 6.9 7.5 0.6 pp Earnings before tax 664 768 15.7 % Net earnings 431 530 23.0 % Earnings after minority interests 435 519 19.3 % Earnings per preferred share in euros 3.06 3.65 19.3 % Earnings per preferred share excl. income from Clorox share buy-back in euros 3.06 3.44 12.4 % Return on capital employed (ROCE) % 15.7 16.2 0.5 pp Capital expenditures (incl. financial assets) 494 5801) 17.4 % Research and development costs 259 257 – 0.8 % Number of employees (annual average) 47,203 48,328 2.4 % 1) not included: Wella (280 million euros) pp = percentage points Dividend – Henkel KGaA in euros 2002 2003 Change Per ordinary share 1.06 1.14 1) 7.5 % Per non-voting preferred share 1.12 1.20 1) 7.1 % 1) proposed Contents 01 The Company 33 Sustainability 55 Notes to the statement of income 02 Preface 34 Laundry & Home Care 60 Notes to the balance sheet 04 Management Board 36 Cosmetics/Toiletries 84 Events after the balance sheet date 06 Henkel at a glance 38 Consumer and 84 Appropriation of the profit of 09 Strategy Craftsmen Adhesives Henkel KGaA 13 Shares 40 Henkel Technologies 85 Financial statements of 17 Value-based management/ 42 Risk report Henkel KGaA Corporate governance 44 Outlook for the Henkel Group 86
    [Show full text]
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 _________________ FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): January 24, 2017 THE CLOROX COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) _________________ Delaware 1-07151 31-0595760 (State or other jurisdiction of (Commission File Number) (I.R.S. Employer incorporation) Identification No.) 1221 Broadway, Oakland, California 94612-1888 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) (510) 271-7000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Not applicable (Former name or former address, if changed since last report) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: [ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 Under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) [ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) [ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) [ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On January 24, 2017, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of The Clorox Company (the “Company”) elected Russell Weiner to the Board, effective February 6, 2017. The committees of the Board on which Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Think Outside the Bottle
    THE CL THE O R O X C X O MP A NY 2011 A NN UA L R EP O R T : O U R FIN A N C I A L, E NVIR O NMEN ta L, S oc I A L The Clorox Company A ND G 1221 Broadway O Oakland, CA 94612 VERN A N 510-271-7000 C E P www.TheCloroxCompany.com ER fo RM A N C E Printing this book on paper made with post-consumer recycled fiber saves* Trees Water Energy Greenhouse Gases Solid Waste 1,404 trees 442,614 gallons 738 million BTUs 195,374 pounds 48,972 pounds Think Outside the Bottle Produced with the highest regard for the planet and its ecosystems, this report is the result of an extensive, collaborative effort of Clorox and its supply chain partners. 2011 ANNUAL REPORT: Exceptional care was taken to utilize environmentally sustainable materials and responsible manufacturing processes to ensure a minimized environmental impact. This report was printed at EarthColor using 100% renewable wind power (RECs) and low-impact manufacturing principles, including: lean manufacturing, green OUR FINANCIAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, chemistry principles, the recycling of residual materials, as well as the use of reduced VOC inks and coatings. Carbon offsets matching the carbon signature of the SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE PErfORMANCE paper, as well as the printing process, were purchased rendering this report carbon-balanced. * Environmental impact savings results were derived from the Mohawk Environmental Calculator and are based on information from the Environmental Paper Network, as well as research done by the Paper Task Force.
    [Show full text]
  • A Downtown for Everyone Robert A
    REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015 A DOWNTOWN Shaping the future of FOR downtown Oakland EVERYONE Contents Acknowledgements 4 Executive Summary SPUR staff Egon Terplan, Project lead 6 Introduction Mohit Shewaramani, Oakland Fellow 9 How We Got Here Sarah Jo Szambelan, Research Manager Robert Ogilvie, Oakland Director 12 Today’s Opportunities and Challenges SPUR Oakland City Board 20 Our Vision: A Downtown for Everyone Robert A. Wilkins (project co-chair) Bill Stotler (project co-chair) 24 BIG IDEA 1 Tomiquia Moss (board chair) Grow 50,000 more jobs in downtown and create pathways to get Fred Blackwell people into them. Deborah Boyer 33 BIG IDEA 2 Anagha Dandekar Clifford Jose Corona Bring 25,000 more residents to downtown at a range of incomes, and Charmaine Curtis enable existing residents to remain. Paul Figueroa 37 BIG IDEA 3 Mike Ghielmetti Set clear and consistent rules for growth to make downtown a better Spencer Gillette place for everyone. Chris Iglesias Robert Joseph 44 BIG IDEA 4 Ken Lowney Create inviting public spaces and streets as part of an active public Christopher Lytle realm. Olis Simmons Joshua Simon 54 BIG IDEA 5 Resources and reviewers Make it easy to get to and around downtown through an expanded Anyka Barber, Alex Boyd, Anthony Bruzzone, Clarissa transportation network. Cabansagan, Dave Campbell, Jim Cunradi, John Dolby, 63 Big Ideas for the Future Margo Dunlap, Karen Engel, Sarah Filley, Rachel Flynn, Erin Ferguson, Sarah Fine, Aliza Gallo, Jennie Gerard, June 66 Plan of Action Grant, Savlan Hauser, Linda Hausrath, Zakiya Harris,
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Resistance of Solarkote a Acrylic Capstock Resins
    Chemical Resistance of Solarkote A Acrylic Capstock Resins Solarkote® acrylic capstock resins have good resistance to a variety of common cleaners and application environments. The chemical resistance of Solarkote acrylic capstock resins will vary with the stress level, temperature, reagent, duration of exposure and resin grade. Altuglas International recommends that parts made from Solarkote resins be tested with all reagents under appropriate conditions for the end-use application. In general the following chemicals may be safely used with parts made from Solarkote acrylic capstock resins under moderate stress at ambient temperature conditions: Calgon® Bath Oil Glass Plus® Cleaner Sodium Hydroxide Clorox® Bleach Liquid Comet® Cleaner Sodium Hypochlorite Fantastic® Cleaner Mineral Oil Soft Scrub® Cleanser Formula 409® Cleaner Mr. Clean® Cleaner Spic & Span® Powder Freon TF Cleaner Propylene Glycol Soap and Water The following chemicals may be used with caution in low-stress and/or short-duration exposure at ambient conditions: Ammonia Ethyl Alcohol (≤40%) Lestoil® Cleaner Brake Fluid Gasoline Lysol® Basin, Tub Chlorine (10%) Isopropyl Alcohol (≤50%) Pinesol® Cleaner Dow Disinfectant Kerosene VM&P Naphtha Bathroom & Tile Cleaner The following chemicals may cause crazing, cracking, discoloration, or dissolving of acrylic articles and are generally not recommended: Acetic Acid Chlorinated Solvents Toluene Acetone Lacquer Thinner Turpentine Aromatic Solvents Lysol® Spray Disinfectant White Cap® Cleaner Benzene Sulfuric Acid Xylene Butyl Alcohol
    [Show full text]